According to Charles W. Wallace in The First London Theatre (1913), John Alleyn and the Admiral's Men left the Theatre for the Rose in November 1590 because of a quarrel over money owed to Alleyn and his company by James Burbage. Wallace's evidence was Alleyn's depositions in the lawsuit, in which Alleyn testified to an angry exchange between himself and Burbage about the playhouse receipts. Wallace implied that this quarrel became a commercial rivalry between the Admiral's Men and the Chamberlain's Men. The alleged Alleyn-Burbage feud was soon regarded as fact. W. W. Greg in Dramatic Documents from the Elizabethan Playhouses (1931) explained the provenance of playhouse documents by way of it, and R. B. Sharpe in The Real War of the Theaters (1935) based a theory of commerce on it. Current narratives of company histories continue to show residual effects of the belief that a players' feud became company rivalry. In The Shakespearian Playing Companies (1996) Andrew Gurr, who elsewhere argues for the cooperation of the Lord Admiral and the Lord Chamberlain in the establishment of their respective companies in 1594, depicts the Admiral's Men as losing “no time in moving” to the Fortune when the Chamberlain's Men moved into the Globe, across the street from the Rose; he adds that Philip Henslowe brought the company of Worcester's Men into the Rose “as a reprisal of sorts, putting it in direct competition with its new rivals and neighbours at the Globe.”