Allen, Margaret. 1978. Morphological investigations. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs

Anderson, Stephen. 1992. A-Morphous Morphology. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Andrews, Edna. 1986. A synchronic semantic analysis of de- and un- in American English. American Speech 61: 221–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Apresjan, Jurij. 1974. Regular polysemy. Linguistics 142: 5–32Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Aronoff, Mark 1994. Morphology By Itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Aronoff, Mark and Cho, Sungeun. 2001. The semantics of -ship suffixation. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 167–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aronoff, Mark and Fuhrhop, Nanna. 2002. Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: closing suffixes and the monosuffix constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 451–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baayen, R. Harald. 1989. A corpus-based approach to morphological productivity. PhD dissertation, Free University, Amsterdam

Baayen, R. Harald and Lieber, Rochelle. 1991. Productivity and English derivations: a corpus-based study. Linguistics 29: 801–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bach, Emmon. 1986. The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 5–16Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 1985. Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

Baker, Mark 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Baker, Mark 1996. The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Barker, Chris. 1998. Episodic -ee in English: a thematic role constraint on new word formation. Language 74: 695–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie. 1987. -ee by gum!American Speech 62: 315–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie 1988. Introducing Linguistic Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press

Bauer, Laurie 1993. More -ee words. American Speech 68: 222–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Beard, Robert. 1981. The Indo-European Lexicon: A Full Synchronic Theory. North Holland Linguistics Series 44. Amsterdam: North Holland

Beard, Robert 1991. Decompositional composition: the semantics of scope ambiguities and “bracketing paradoxes.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 195–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beard, Robert 1993. Simultaneous dual derivational origin. Language 69: 716–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beard, Robert 1995. Lexeme Morpheme Base Morphology. New York: SUNY Press

Bennett, Michael and Barbara Partee. 1972. Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English. Bloomington, IN: distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club

Bierwisch, Manfred. 1988. On the grammar of local prepositions. In Manfred Bierwisch, W. Motsch, and I. Zimmermann, eds., Syntax, Semantik, und Lexikon: Rudolf Ruzicka zum 65. Geburtstag. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. 1–65

Bierwisch, Manfred 1989. The semantics of gradation. In Manfred Bierwisch and Ewald Lang, eds., Dimensional Adjectives: Grammatical Structure and Conceptual Interpretation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 71–267

Bierwisch, Manfred 1996. How much space gets into language? In Paul Bloom, Mary Peterson, Lynn Nadel, and Merrill Garrett, eds., Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 31–76

Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Henry Holt

Booij, Geert. 1986. Form and meaning in morphology: the case of Dutch “Agent” nouns. Linguistics 24: 503–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booij, Geert 1988. The relation between inheritance and argument-linking: deverbal nouns in Dutch. In Martin Everaert, Arnold Evers, Riny Huybrechts, and Mieke Trommelen, eds., Morphology and Modularity. Dordrecht: Foris. 57–74

Booij, Geert 1992. Compounding in Dutch. Rivista di Linguistica 4(1): 37–60Google Scholar

Booij, Geert 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, eds., Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1–16

Booij, Geert 1997. Allomorphy and the autonomy of morphology. Folia Linguistica 31: 25–56

Booij, Geert 2000. Paper delivered at the MPI Workshop on Affix Ordering. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, January 2000

Booij, Geert 2002. The Morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Booij, Geert and Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. On the paradigmatic nature of affixal semantics in English and Dutch. Linguistics 42: 327–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bresnan, Joan and Kannerva, Joni. 1989. Locative inversion in Chichewa: a case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 1–50Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel. 1998. Aspectuality and countability: a cross-categorial analogy. English Language and Linguistics 2 (1): 37–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brugman, Claudia. 1988. The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York. Garland Press

Carlson, Gregory. 1977. Reference to kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Carlson, Lauri. 1981. Aspect and quantification. In P. Tedeschi and A. Zaenen, eds., Syntax and Semantics, vol. XIV: Tense and Aspect. New York: Academic Press. 31–64

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1992. Current Morphology. London: Routledge

Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum, eds., Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn. 184–221

Clark, Eve V. and Herbert, H. Clark. 1979. When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55: 767–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Copestake, Ann and Ted Briscoe. 1996. Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. In James Pustejovsky and Brad Boguraev, eds., Lexical Semantics: The Problem of Polysemy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 15–68

Corbin, Danielle. 1987. Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag

Covington, Michael. 1981. Evidence for Lexicalism: A Critical Review. Bloomington, IN: distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club

Cruse, D. Alan. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Cruse, D. Alan 2000. Aspects of the micro-structure of word meanings. In Yael Ravin and Claudia Leacock, eds., Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 30–51

Delancey, Scott. 1984. Notes on agentivity and causation. Studies in Language 8(2): 181–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delancey, Scott 1985. Agentivity and syntax. Papers from the Regional Meetings, Chicago Linguistic Society 21(2): 1–12Google Scholar

Dell, Francois and Elisabeth Selkirk. 1978. On a morphologically governed vowel alternation in French. In S. J. Keyser, ed., Recent Transformational Studies in European Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–52

Depraetere, Ilse. 1995. On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiSciullo, Anna Maria and Edwin Williams. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Don, Jan. 1993. Morphological conversion. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht

Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and Montague's PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel

Dowty, David 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 574–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ducrot, O. 1973. La Preuve et le Dire. Paris: Maison Mame

Engelberg, Stefan. 1999. “Punctuality” and verb semantics. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium 6(1): 127–40Google Scholar

Fabb, Nigel. 1988. English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 527–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Filip, Hana. 2000. The quantization puzzle. In Carol Tenny and James Pustejovsky, eds., Events as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 39–96

Fodor, Jerry. 1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Giegerich, Heinz. 1999. Lexical Strata in English: Morphological Causes, Phonological Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Gillon, Brendan. 1992. Toward a common semantics for English count and mass nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 597–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, eds., Syntax and Semantics, vol. III: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. 43–58

Grice, H. Paul 1978. Further notes on logic and conversation. In Peter Cole, ed., Syntax and Semantics, vol. IX: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press. 113–28

Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Hale, Kenneth and Samuel J. Keyser. 2002. Prolegomena to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Halle, Morris and Mohanan, K. P.. 1985. Segmental phonology of Modern English. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 57–116Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer, Christopher Kennedy, and Beth Levin. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements.” Proceedings of SALT 9: 127–44

Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2001. Deverbal -er suffixation as morphological equivalent of the clausal subject-finite unit. Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium. Preprint 176

Higginbotham, James. 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–94Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles. 1954. Two models of grammatical description. Word 10: 210–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, Laurence. 1989/2001. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; reprinted 2001 by CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA

Horn, Laurence 2002. Uncovering the un-word: a study in lexical pragmatics. Sophia Linguistica 49: 1–64Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Jackendoff, Ray 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Jackendoff, Ray 1987. The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 369–412Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Jackendoff, Ray 1991. Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41: 9–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jackendoff, Ray 1996a. The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 305–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray 1996b. The architecture of the linguistic-spatial interface. In Paul Bloom, Mary Peterson, Lynn Nadel, and Merrill Garrett, eds., Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–30

Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1986. Passive. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 587–622Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto. 1931. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part IV: Syntax. London: George Allen and Unwin; reprinted 1965

Jespersen, Otto 1942. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part VI: Morphology. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard

Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In H. van der Hulst and N. Smith, eds., The Structure of Phonological Representations. Dordrecht: Foris. 131–75

Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In Gregory N. Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier, eds., The Generic Book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 125–75

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Landau, Barbara. 1996. Multiple geometric representations of objects in languages and language learners. In Paul Bloom, Mary Peterson, Lynn Nadel, and Merrill Garrett, eds., Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 317–64

Landman, Fred. 1989. Groups I, II. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 559–605, 723–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landman, Fred 1996. Plurality. In Shalom Lappin, ed., The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. 425–58

Lapointe, Steven. 2001. Stem selection and OT. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, eds., Yearbook of Morphology 1999. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 263–98

Lasersohn, Peter. 1995. Plurality, Conjunction and Events. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Lees, Robert. 1963. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton

Lehnert, Martin. 1971. Reverse Dictionary of Present-Day English. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie

Levi, Judith. 1978. The Syntax of Complex Nominals. New York: Academic Press

Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Levin, Beth 1999. Objecthood: an event structure perspective. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 35(1): 223–47Google Scholar

Levin, Beth and Rappaport, Malka. 1986. The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 623–61Google Scholar

Levin, Beth and Rappaport, Malka 1988. Non-event -er nominals: a probe into argument structure. Linguistics 26: 1067–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Lieber, Rochelle. 1980. On the organization of the lexicon. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. [Published by Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1981 and Garland Press, 1990.]

Lieber, Rochelle 1981. Morphological conversion within a restrictive theory of the lexicon. In M. Moortgat, H. van der Hulst, and T. Hoekstra, eds., The Scope of Lexical Rules. Dordrecht: Foris. 161–200

Lieber, Rochelle 1983. Argument linking and compounds in English. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 251–86Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle 1992a. Deconstructing Morphology: Word Formation in Syntactic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Lieber, Rochelle 1992b. Compounding in English. Rivista di Linguistica 4(1): 79–96Google Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle 1998. The suffix -ize in English: implications for morphology. In Steven G. Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari, and Patrick M. Farrell, eds., Morphology and Its Relation to Phonology and Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 12–34

Lieber, Rochelle and Baayen, Harald. 1997. A semantic principle of auxiliary selection in Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 789–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieber, Rochelle and Harald Baayen 1999. Nominalizations in a calculus of lexical semantic representations. In Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle, eds., Yearbook of Morphology 1998. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 175–98

Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Marchand, Hans. 1969. The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word Formation. A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach. Munich: Beck

Matthews, P. 1972. Inflectional Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Matthews, P. 1974. Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Maynor, Natalie. 1979. The morpheme un: American Speech 54: 310–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mittwoch, Anita. 1991. In defense of Vendler's achievements. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 6: 71–86Google Scholar

Mohanan, K. P. 1986. The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel

Mohanan, Tara and K. P. Mohanan. 1999. On representations in grammatical semantics. In Tara Mohanan and Lionel Wee, eds., Grammatical Semantics: Evidence for Structure in Meaning. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 23–76

Muysken, Pieter. 1986. Approaches to affix order. Linguistics 24: 629–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick. 1999. Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Newmeyer, Frederick 2002. Optimality and functionality: a critique of functionally-based optimality theoretic syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 43–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1996. Transfers of meaning. In James Pustejovsky and Brad Boguraev, eds., Lexical Semantics, The Problem of Polysemy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 109–32

Orgun, Cemil Orhan and Sprouse, Ronald. 1999. From mparse to control: deriving ungrammaticality. Phonology 16(2): 191–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Panther, Klaus-Uwe and Linda Thornburg. 1998. The polysemy of the derivational -er suffix in English. Paper delivered at the Cognitive Morphology Workshop, Ghent, Belgium, July, 1998

Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Pustejovsky, James. 1991. The syntax of event structure. Cognition 41: 47–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pustejovsky, James 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Pustejovsky, James and Brad Boguraev. 1996. Introduction: lexical semantics in context. In James Pustejovsky and Brad Boguraev, eds., Lexical Semantics: The Problem of Polysemy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1–14

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman

Raffelsiefen, Renate. 1996. Gaps in word formation. In Ursula Kleinhenz, ed., Interfaces in Phonology. Berlin: Academie-Verlag. 194–209

Ramchand, Gillian. 1997. Aspect and Predication. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Beth Levin. 1992. -ER nominals: implications for the theory of argument structure. In T. Stowell and E. Wehrli, eds., Syntax and Semantics, vol. XXVI: Syntax and the Lexicon. New York: Academic Press. 127–53

Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Beth Levin 1996. Two types of derived accomplishments. In Miriam Butt and Tracy H. King, eds., Proceedings of the First LFG Conference. Grenoble: RANK Xerox. 375–88

Rappaport Hovav, Malka and Beth Levin 1998. Building verb meanings. In M. Butt and W. Geuder, eds., The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. Stanford, CSLI Publications. 97–134

Rice, Keren. 1998. Slave (Northern Athapaskan). In Andrew Spencer and Arnold Zwicky, eds., The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell. 648–89

Richardson, John. 1985. Agenthood and case. Papers from the Regional Meetings, Chicago Linguistic Society 21(2): 241–51Google Scholar

Roeper, Thomas. 1988. Compound syntax and head movement. Yearbook of Morphology 1: 187–228Google Scholar

Roeper, Thomas and Siegel, Muffy. 1978. A lexical transformation for verbal compounds. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 197–260Google Scholar

Ryder, Mary Ellen. 1999. Bankers and blue-chippers: an account of -er formations in present-day English. English Language and Linguistics 3: 269–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saeed, John. 1997. Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell

Sapir, Edward. 1944. Grading: A Study in Semantics reprinted in D. Mandelbaum, ed., Selected Writings. Berkeley: University of California Press 1951. 122–49

Scalise, Sergio. 1984. Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris

Schein, Barry. 1993. Plurals and Events. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Schultink, Henk. 1975. Output conditions in word formation?In Ut Videam: Contributions to an Understanding of Linguistics. Lisse: Peter De Ridder Press. 263–72

Schwarzchild, Roger. 1992. Types of plural individuals. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 641–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwarzchild, Roger 1996. Pluralities. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press

Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Siegel, Dorothy. 1974. Topics in English morphology. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

Siegel, Dorothy 1977. The adjacency condition and the theory of morphology. Proceedings of NELS 8. Amherst, MA: GLSA. 189–97Google Scholar

Smith, Carlotta. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect (2nd edition). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Spencer, Andrew. 1991. Morphological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell

Sproat, Richard. 1985. On deriving the lexicon. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

Strauss, Steven. 1982. On “Relatedness Paradoxes” and Related Paradoxes. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 694–700Google Scholar

Stump, Gregory. 2001. Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Szymanek, Bogdan. 1988. Categories and Categorization in Morphology. Lublin: Catholic University Press

Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen, ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 57–149

Talmy, Leonard 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Tenny, Carol. 1987. Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

Tenny, Carol 1994. Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Tenny, Carol and James Pustejovsky. 2000. A history of events in linguistic theory. In Carol Tenny and James Pustejovsky, eds., Events as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 3–38

Tyler, Andrea and Evans, Vyvyan. 2001. Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: the case of over. Language 77(4): 724–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Valin, Robert and Randy LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

Verkuyl, Henk. 1972. On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel

Verkuyl, Henk 1989. Aspectual classes and aspectual composition. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 39–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verkuyl, Henk 1993. A Theory of Aspectuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Verkuyl, Henk 1999. Aspectual Issues: Studies on Time and Quantity. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1972. Semantic Primitives. Linguistische Forschungen. No. 22. Frankfurt: Athenäum

Wierzbicka, Anna 1980. Lingua Mentalis: The Semantics of Natural Language. Sydney: Academic Press

Wierzbicka, Anna 1985. Lexicography and Conceptual Analysis. Ann Arbor: Karoma

Wierzbicka, Anna 1988. The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Wierzbicka, Anna 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Williams, Edwin. 1981. Argument structure and morphology. Linguistic Review 1: 81–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmer, Karl. 1964. Affixal Negation in English and Other Languages. Supplement to Word, Monograph No. 5