Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T15:05:06.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Sanford C. Goldberg
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Anti-Individualism
Mind and Language, Knowledge and Justification
, pp. 239 - 250
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, J. 1994. “Testimony, Trust, Knowing.” Journal of Philosophy 91, 264–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, J. 1996. “Transmitting Knowledge.” Noûs 30: 1, 99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, J. 1997. “Lying, Deceiving, or Falsely Implicating.” Journal of Philosophy 94: 9, 435–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, W. 1986. “Internalism and Externalism in Epistemology.” Philosophical Topics 14, 179–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. 1973. Belief, Truth, and Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, R. 1988. “Justification, Truth, and Reliability.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49: 1, 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, R. 1993. The Structure of Justification (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Audi, R. 1997. “The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and Justification.” American Philosophical Quarterly 34: 4, 405–22Google Scholar
Bach, K. 1988. “Burge's New Thought Experiment: Back to the Drawing Room.” The Journal of Philosophy 85, 88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, K. 1994. “Conversational Implicitures.” Mind and Language 9, 24–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, K. 1997a. “Do Belief Reports Report Beliefs?Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78: 3, 215–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, K. 1997b. “The Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction: What It Is and Why It Matters.” Linguistiche Berichte 8, 33–50Google Scholar
Bach, K. and Elugardo, R. 2003. “Conceptual Minimalism and Anti-Individualism: A Reply to Goldberg,” Noûs 37: 1, 151–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, D. and Moses, L. 1996. “The Ontogeny of Social Information Gathering.” Child Development 67, 1915–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Raviv, A., and Brosh, M. 1990. “Perception of Epistemic Authority and Attribution for its Choice as a Function of Knowledge Area and Age.” European Journal of Social Psychology 21, 477–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezuidenhout, A. 1997. “Pragmatics, Semantic Underdetermination and the Referential- Attributive Distinction.” Mind 106, 375–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezuidenhout, A. 1998. “Is Verbal Communication a Purely Preservative Process?Philosophical Review 107, 261–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilgrami, A. 1992. Belief and Meaning (Oxford: Basil Blackwell)Google Scholar
Boghossian, P. 1989. “Content and Self-Knowledge.” Philosophical Topics 17: 1, 5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonjour, L. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Bonjour, L. 1999. In Defense of Pure Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Bonjour, L. and Sosa, E. 2003. Epistemic Justification (London: Blackwell)Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 1983. “Asserting.” Noûs 17, 637–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. 1994. Making It Explicit (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Brown, J. 2004. Anti-Individualism and Knowledge (Cambridge: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Burge, T. 1979. “Individualism and the Mental.” Reprinted in Rosenthal, D. (ed.) The Nature of Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), 536–67Google Scholar
Burge, T.1982a. “Other Bodies.” In Woodfield, A. (ed.) Thought and Object (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 97–120Google Scholar
Burge, T. 1982b. “Two Thought Experiments Reviewed.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23: 3, 284–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. 1986. “Intellectual Norms and the Foundations of Mind.” Journal of Philosophy 83, 697–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. 1986b. “Individualism and Psychology.” Philosophical Review 95, 3–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. 1987. “Individualism and Self-Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 85: 11, 649–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T.1988. “Cartesian Error and the Objectivity of Perception.” In Grimm, R. and Merrill, D., Contents of Thought (Tucson: University of Arizona Press)Google Scholar
Burge, T.1989. “Wherein is Language Social?” In George, A. (ed.) Reflections on ChomskyOxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. 1993. “Content Preservation.” Philosophical Review 102: 4, 457–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. 1996. “Our Entitlement to Self-Knowledge.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96, 91–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. 1997. “Interlocution, Perception, and Memory.” Philosophical Studies 86, 21–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T.1998. “Memory and Self-Knowledge.” In Ludlow, P. and Martin, N., eds, Externalism and Self-Knowledge (Palo Alto: CSLI Publications), 351–70Google Scholar
Burge, T.1999. “Comprehension and Interpretation.” In Hahn, Lewis (ed.), The Philosophy of Donald Davidson (Chicago: Open Court Press), 229–50Google Scholar
Burge, T. 2003. “Perceptual Entitlement.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67: 3, 503–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brueckner, A. 1997. “Externalism and Memory.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78: 1, 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, A. and Thau, M. 1995. “In Defense of the Hybrid View.” Mind 105, 139–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. 1997. “On an Alleged Connection between Indirect Speech and the Theory of Meaning.” Mind and Language 12, 278–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carston, R. 1988. “Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-Theoretic Semantics.” In Davis, S. (ed.) Pragmatics: A Reader (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 33–51Google Scholar
Carston, R. 2002. “Linguistic Meaning, Communicated Meaning, and Cognitive Pragmatics.” Mind and Language 17, 127–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceci, S., Ross, D., and Toglia, M. 1987. “Age Differences in Suggestibility: Psycholegal Implications.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 117, 38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceci, S. and Bruck, M. 1993. “Suggestibility of the Child Witness: a Historical Review and Synthesis.” Psychological Bulletin 113, 403–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, R. 1977. Theory of Knowledge, 2nd edn (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall)Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1980. Rules and Representations (New York: Columbia University Press)Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use (New York: Praeger)Google Scholar
Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. 1998. “The Extended Mind.” Analysis 58, 7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clément, F., Koenig, M., and Harris, , 2004. “The Ontogenesis of Trust.” Mind and Language 19: 4, 360–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, W. K. 1999. “The Ethics of Belief.” In Ethics of Belief and Other Essays (NY: Prometheus Books, 1999)Google Scholar
Coady, C. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Coady, C. 2002. “Testimony and Intellectual Autonomy.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33, 355–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S. 1984. “Justification and Truth.” Philosophical Studies 46, 279–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study (Oxford: Clarendon Press)Google Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. 1994. “Testimony, Observation and ‘Autonomous Knowledge.’” in Knowing From Words, Matilal, B., and Chakrabarti, A., eds. (Dordrech: Kluwer, 1994), 225–50Google Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. 2002. “Testimony and Intellectual Autonomy,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 33: 2, 355–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conee, E. 2007. “Externally Enhanced Internalism.” In Goldberg, S. (ed.) Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Conee, E. and Feldman, R. 2004. Evidentialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danto, A. 1969. “Semantical Vehicles, Understanding, and Innate Ideas.” In Hook, S. (ed.), Language and Philosophy (New York: New York University Press)Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Davidson, D.1986. “A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs.” In Lepore, E. (ed.) Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 433–46Google Scholar
Davidson, D.1999. “Reply to Tyler Burge.” In Hahn, Lewis (ed.) The Philosophy of Donald Davidson (Chicago: Open Court Press), 251–4Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 2001. Subject, Intersubjective, Objective (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. 2002. “Conversation, Epistemology, and Norms.” Mind and Language 17: 5, 513–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRose, K. 1991. “Epistemic Possibilities.” Philosophical Review 91, 581–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, M. and Harris, , 1990. “The Influence of the Imagination on Reasoning by Young Children.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 8, 305–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. 1982. “A Cognitive Cul-de-Sac.” Mind 91, 109–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, M. 1978. “Frege's Distinction between Sense and Reference.” In Dummett, M., Truth and Other Enigmas (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), 116–44Google Scholar
Dummett, M.1994. “Testimony and Memory.” In Matilal, B. K. and Chakrabarti, A., eds. Knowing from Words (Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 251–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbs, G. 1997. “Can We Take Our Words at Face Value?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56: 3, 499–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, F. 1991. “Must Psychology be Individualistic?Philosophical Review 100, 179–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, F. 1992. “Individualism, Computation, and Perceptual Content.” Mind 101, 443–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, F. 1995. “Computation and Content.” Philosophical Review 104: 2, 181–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, F. 1999. “In Defense of Narrow Mindedness.” Mind and Language 14, 177–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgin, C. 2002. “Take It from Me: The Epistemological Status of Testimony.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 2, 291–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elugardo, R. 1993. “Burge on Content.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53: 2, 367–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. 1982. The Varieties of Reference (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Falvey, K. and Owens, J. 1994. “Externalism, Self-Knowledge, and Skepticism.” Philosophical Review 103: 1, 107–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, , 2000. “The Social Character of Testimonial Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 97: 11, 581–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R. 2004. “In Search of Internalism and Externalism.” In Schantz, R. (ed.) The Externalist Challenge (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 143–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R.Forthcoming: “Epistemological Puzzles about Disagreement.” In Hetherington, S. (ed.) Epistemology Futures (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
Flavell, J. 1979. “Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry.” American Psychologist 34: 906–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. 2002. The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way: The Scopes and Limits of Computational Psychology. Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Foley, R. 1994. “Egoism in Epistemology.” In Schmitt, F. (ed.) Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield), 53–73Google Scholar
Foley, R.2004. “A Trial Separation between the Theory of Knowledge and the Theory of Justified Belief.” In Greco, J. (ed.) Ernest Sosa and his Critics (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers), 59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, E. 1987. “The Epistemology of Testimony.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplemental Vol. 61, 57–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, E.1994. “Against Gullibility.” In Matilal, B. K. and Chakrabarti, A., eds. Knowing from Words (Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 125–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, E. 1995. “Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony.” Mind 104, 393–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, E.2003. “Understanding and Knowledge of What is Said.” In Barber, A. (ed.) The Epistemology of Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 325–66Google Scholar
Fricker, E.2006. “Testimony and Epistemic Autonomy.” In Lackey, J. and Sosa, E., eds. The Epistemology of Testimony (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 225–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauker, C. 1991. “Mental Content and the Division of Epistemic Labor.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69: 302–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauker, C. 1994. Thinking Out Loud (Princeton: Princeton University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauker, C. 2001. “Situated Inference versus Conversational Implicature.” Noûs 35, 163–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, J. 1996. “Externalism and Knowledge of Content.” Philosophical Review 105: 3, 287310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (Boston: Houghton Mifflin)Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T. 1991. “How Mental Systems Believe.” American Psychologist 46: 107–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, D. T.1992. “Assent of Man: Mental Representation and the Control of Belief.” In Wegner, D. M. and Pennebaker, J., eds. The Handbook of Mental Control (New York: Prentice-Hall)Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D. S., and Malone, S. 1990. “Understanding the Unbelievable: Some Problems in the Rejection of False Information.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 601–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., Tafarodi, R. W., and Malone, S. 1993. “You Can’t Not Believe Everything you Read.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65, 221–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, J., Gopnik, A., and Heyman, G. 2002. “Source Monitoring Reduces the Suggestibility of Preschool Children.” Psychological Science 13: 3, 288–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, S. 1997. “Self-Ascription, Self-Knowledge, and the Memory Argument.” Analysis 57: 3, 211–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. 1999. “The Relevance of Discriminatory Knowledge of Content,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80: 2, 136–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2000. “The Semantics of Interlocution.” Communication and Cognition 33: 3, 243–80Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2000b. “World-Switching, Word-Ambiguity, and Semantic Intentions,” Analysis 60: 3, 260–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2001. “Testimonially Based Knowledge from False Testimony.” Philosophical Quarterly 51: 205, 512–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2002a. “Do Anti-Individualistic Construals of the Attitudes Capture the Agent's Conceptions?Noûs 36: 4, 597–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2002b. “Reported Speech and the Epistemology of Testimony.” Protosociology 17, 57–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2003a. “Anti-Individualism, Conceptual Omniscience, and Skepticism.”Philosophical Studies 116: 1, 53–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S.2003b. “What do you Know When you Know your Own Thoughts?” In Nuccetelli, S. (ed.), New Essays on Semantic Externalism and Self-Knowledge (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003), 241–56Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2004a. “Radical Interpretation, Understanding, and Testimonial Transmission.”Synthese 138: 3, 387–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S.2004b. “Descriptions, Context-Sensitivity, and the Epistemology of Testimony.” In Sàágua, João (ed.) The Explanation of Human Interpretation. (Lisbon: Colibri Editions, 2004), 473–85Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2005a. “The Dialectical Context of Boghossian's Memory Argument.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35: 1, 135–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2005b. “Testimonial Knowledge from Unsafe Testimony.” Analysis 65: 4, 302–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2005c. “(Non-standard) Lessons from World-Switching Cases,” Philosophia 32: 1, 95–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S.2006. “Reductionism and the Distinctiveness of Testimonial Knowledge.” In Lackey, J., and Sosa, E., eds. The Epistemology of Testimony (Oxford University Press), 127–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S.Forthcoming a. “The Epistemic Utility of What is Said.” In Stainton, R. and Viger, C., eds. Compositionality, Context, and Semantic Values: Essays in Honor of Ernie Lepore. (Springer Verlag)CrossRef
Goldberg, S. 2007a. “Anti-Individualism, Content Preservation, and Discursive Justification.” NoûsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S.Forthcoming b. “How Lucky Can you Get?Synthese
Goldberg, S.Forthcoming c. “The Knowledge Account of Assertion and the Conditions on Testimonial Knowledge.” In Pritchard, D. and Greenough, . eds. Williamson on Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, in preparation)
Goldberg, S. 2007b. “Brown on Discriminability and Self-Knowledge.” Pacific Philosophical QuarterlyGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S.2007c. “Semantic Externalism and Illusions of Epistemic Relevance.” In Goldberg, S. (ed.) Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, in preparation)Google Scholar
Goldberg, S.Unpublished Manuscript. “Justification as the Entitlement to Regard one's Belief as Warranted”
Goldberg, S. and Henderson, D. 2007. “Monitoring and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony.” Philosophy and Phenomenological ResearchGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 1976. “Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge.” Reprinted in Goldman 1992
Goldman, A. 1980. “The Internalist Conception of Justification.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 1986. Epistemology and Cognition (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 1992. Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences (Cambridge: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A.1999b. “Internalism Exposed.” Reprinted in Goldman 2002
Goldman, A.2001a. “The Unity of the Epistemic Virtues.” In Fairweather, A. and Zagzebski, L., Virtue Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Reprinted in Goldman 2002Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 2001b. “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63: 1, 85–110. Reprinted in Goldman 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 2001c. “Social Routes to Belief and Knowledge.” Reprinted in Goldman 2002Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 2002. Pathways to Knowledge: Public and Private (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 2004. “Group Knowledge vs. Group Rationality: Two Approaches to Social Epistemology.” Episteme 1, 11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A., and Graf, P. 1988. “Knowing How you Know: Young Children's Ability to Identify and Remember the Sources of Their Beliefs.” Child Development 59: 1366–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, P. 1997. “What is Testimony?The Philosophical Quarterly 47: 187, 227–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, P. 1999. “Transferring Knowledge.” Noûs 34, 131–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, P. 2000a. “Conveying Information.” Synthese 123: 3, 365–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, P. 2000b. “The Reliability of Testimony.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61: 3, 695–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, J. 2000. Putting Skeptics in their Place (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, J.2004. “Knowledge as Credit for True Belief.” In DePaul, Michael and Zagzebski, Linda, eds. Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1989. “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Grundmann, A. 2004. “Counterexamples to Epistemic Externalism Revisited.” In Schantz, R. (ed.) The Externalist Challenge (Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, S. 1993. Evidence and Inquiry (Oxford: Basil Blackwell)Google Scholar
Hardwig, J. 1991. “The Role of Trust in Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 88, 693–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, , 2002. “Checking our sources: The Origins of Trust in Testimony.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33: 2, 315–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heal, J. 1998. “Externalism and Memory II.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 72 (Supplemental Volume), 95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heck, R. 1995. “The Sense of Communication.” Mind 104, 79–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heck, R. 1996. “Communication and Knowledge: A Rejoinder to Byrne and Thau.” Mind 105: 139–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, D. and Horgan, T. 2000. “Iceberg Epistemology.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61: 3, 497–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, D. and Horgan, T.Forthcoming. “The Ins and Outs of Transglobal Reliability.” In Goldberg, S. (ed.) Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
Heyman, G. and Legare, C. forthcoming. “Children's Evaluation of Sources of Information about Traits.” Developmental Psychology
Horgan, T., and Tienson, J. 1995. “Connectionism and the Commitments of Folk Psychology.” In Tomberlin, J. (ed.) AI, Connectionism, and Philosophical Psychology, (Ridgeview: Atascadero)Google Scholar
Horgan, T., and Tienson, J. 1996. Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology. Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Hubel, D. 1995. Eye, Brain, Vision (New York: W. H. Freeman)Google Scholar
Insole, C. 2000. “Seeing Off the Local Threat to Irreducible Knowledge by Testimony.” Philosophical Quarterly 50: 198, 44–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, J. 1994. “The Role of Comprehension.” In Matilal, B. K. and Chakrabarti, A., eds. Knowing from Words (Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 163–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. 2005. “On an Argument from Properties of Words to Broad Content.” In Schantz, R. (ed.) The Externalist Challenge (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 319–27Google Scholar
Kelly, T. 2005. “The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement.” In Hawthorne, J., and Gendler, T., eds. Oxford Studies in Epistemology: Volume 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Koenig, M., Clément, F., and Harris, , 2004. “Trust in Testimony: Children's Use of True and False Statements.” Psychological Science 15: 10, 694–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenig, M., and Echols, C. 2003. “Infants’ Understanding of False Labeling Events: The Referential Roles of Words and the Speakers who Use Them.” Cognition 87, 179–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, H. 1988. “How Internal Can You Get?” Reprinted in Kornblith 2001
Kornblith, H.2001. Epistemology: Internalism and Externalism. Kornblith, H. (ed.) (London: Blackwell)Google Scholar
Kutsch, M. 2002a. “Testimony in Communitarian Epistemology.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 33Google Scholar
Kutsch, M. 2002b. Knowledge By Agreement: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvanvig, J. 1996. Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honor of Plantinga's Theory of Knowledge. (Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield)Google Scholar
Kvanvig, J.2003. The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding (New York: Cambridge University Press)
Lackey, J. 1999. “Testimonial Knowledge and Transmission.” The Philosophical Quarterly 49: 197, 471–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. 2003. “A Minimal Expression of Non-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony.” Noûs 37: 4, 706–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. 2005. “Testimony and the Infant/Child Objection.” Philosophical Studies 126: 163–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J.2006. “It Takes Two to Tango.” In Lackey, J. and Sosa, E., eds. The Epistemology of Testimony (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 160–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J.Forthcoming a. “Learning From Words.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Lackey, J.Forthcoming b. “Why We Don’t Deserve Credit for Everything We Know.” Synthese
Lackey, J.Unpublished Manuscript. “Assertion without Knowledge”
Lampinen, J. and Smith, V. 1995. “The Incredible (and Sometimes Incredulous) Child Witness: Child Eyewitnesses’ Sensitivity to Source Credibility Cues.” Journal of Applied Psychology 80: 5, 621–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, K. 1981. “A Self Profile.” In Bogdan, R. (ed.) Keith Lehrer. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 3–104Google Scholar
Lehrer, K.1989. “Knowledge Reconsidered.” In Clay, M. and Lehrer, K., eds. Knowledge and Skepticism (Boulder: Westview Press)Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1975. “Language and Languages.” In Gunderson, K. (ed.) Language, Mind, and Knowledge (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), 3–35Google Scholar
Loar, B. 1988. “Social Content and Psychological Content.” In Grimm, R. and Merrill, D., eds., Contents of Thought (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), 99–110Google Scholar
Loftus, E., and Ketchum, K. 1991. Witness for the Defense: The Accused, the Eyewitness and the Expert who Puts Memory on Trial (New York: St. Martin's Press)Google Scholar
Ludlow, P. 1995. “Externalism, Self-Knowledge, and the Prevalence of Slow Switching.” Analysis 55: 1, 45–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, D. and Keil, F. 2002. “Early Understanding of the Division of Cognitive Labor.” Child Development 73: 1073–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, J. 1997. “Testimony, Induction, and Folk Psychology.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75: 2, 163–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. 1980. “Meaning, Communication, and Knowledge” Reprinted in McDowell 1998
McDowell, J.1981. “Anti-Realism and the Epistemology of Understanding.” Reprinted in McDowell 1998
McDowell, J.1994. “Knowledge by Hearsay.” Reprinted in McDowell 1998
McDowell, J. 1998. Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
McGinn, C. 1984. “The Concept of Knowledge.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 9, 529–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinsey, M. 1994. “Individuating Beliefs.” In Tomberlin, J. (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives 8: Logic and Language. Ridgeview: AtascaderoGoogle Scholar
McKinsey, M. 1999. “The Semantics of Belief Ascriptions.” Noûs 33: 4, 519–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B. and Tye, M. 1998. “Is Content-Externalism Compatible with Privileged Access?Philosophical Review 107: 3, 349–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 2001 (ed.). The Philosophy of Language, 4th edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Millgram, E. 1997. Practical Induction (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Mills, C. and Keil, F. 2004. “Knowing the Limits of One's Understanding: The Development of an Awareness of an Illusion of Explanatory Depth.” Psychological Science 87: 1–32Google ScholarPubMed
Millikan, R. 1995. White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice (Cambridge: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Millikan, R.2004. “Existence Proof for a Viable Externalism.” In Schantz, R. (ed.) The Externalist Challenge (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 227–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, , Robinson, E., Nye, R., and Isaacs, J. 1997. “When Speech Conflicts with Seeing: Young Children's Understanding of Informational Priority.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 64, 276–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, , 1993. “Supervenience and Computational Explanation in Vision Theory.” Philosophy of Science 60, 86–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R. 2001. Invariances: The Structure of the Objective World (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
O’Neill, D., Astington, J., and Flavell, J. 1992. “Young Children's Understanding of the Role that Sensory Experiences Play in Knowledge Acquisition.” Child Development 63, 474–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Neill, D., and Gopnik, A. 1991. “Young Children's Ability to Identify the Sources of their Beliefs.” Developmental Psychology 27, 390–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, S. 1990. “The Explanatory Role of Belief Ascriptions.” Philosophical Studies 59, 313–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pea, R. 1982. “Origins of Verbal Logic: Spontaneous Denials by Two- and Three-Year-Olds.” Journal of Child Language 9, 597–626CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peacocke, C. 2004a. “Explaining Perceptual Entitlement.” In Schantz, R. (ed.) The Externalist Challenge (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 441–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, C. 2004b. The Realm of Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Pettit, D. 2002. “Why Knowledge is Unnecessary for Understanding Language.” Mind 111: 443, 519–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. 1997. How the Mind Works (New York: Norton)Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1993a. Warrant: The Current Debate (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1993b. Warrant and Proper Function (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. 2004. “The Epistemology of Testimony.” Philosophical Issues 14, 326–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. 2005. Epistemic Luck (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.” In Mind, Language, and Knowledge: Philosophical Papers, Volume II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Putnam, H.1996. “Introduction.” In Pessin, A. and Goldberg, S., eds. The Twin Earth Chronicles (Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe), xv–xxiiGoogle Scholar
Recanati, F. 1989. “The Pragmatics of What is Said.” Mind and Language 4: 4, 295–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, F. 2002. “Does Linguistic Communication Rest on Inference?Mind and Language 17: 1/2, 105–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, T. 1872/1993. The Complete Works of Thomas Reid. Hamilton, WilliamSir (ed.) (Edinburgh: Maclachlan and Stewart)Google Scholar
Richards, C. and Sanderson, J. 1999. “The Role of the Imagination in Facilitating Deductive Reasoning in 2-, 3-, and 4-year-olds.” Cognition 72: B1–B9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, E., Champion, H., and Mitchell, , 1999. “Children's Ability to Infer Utterance Veracity from Speaker Informedness.” Developmental Psychology 35, 535–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, E., Mitchell, , and Nye, R. 1995. “Young Children's Treating of Utterances as Unreliable Sources of Knowledge.” Journal of Child Language 22, 663–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, E., and Whitcombe, E. 2003. “Children's Suggestibility in Relation to their Understanding of Sources of Knowledge.” Child Development 74, 48–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, A. 1986. “Why Do We Believe what We Are Told?Ratio 28: 1, 69–88Google Scholar
Ross, J. 1975. “Testimonial Evidence.” In Lehrer,, K. ed. Analysis and Metaphysics: Essays in Honor of R. M. Chisholm (Dordrecht: Reidel), 35–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, K.Simourd, L., and Moore, D. 1989. “Children's Use of a Verbal-Nonverbal Consistency Principle to Infer Truth and Lying.” Child Development 60, 309–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, B. 1924/1993. The Philosophy of Logical Atomism (La Salle, IL: Open Court)Google Scholar
Sabbagh, M. and Baldwin, D. 2001. “Learning Words from Knowledgeable versus Ignorant Speakers: Links between Preschoolers’ Theory of Mind and Semantic Development.” Child Development 72, 1054–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sartwell, C. 1991. “Knowledge is Merely True Belief.” American Philosophical Quarterly 28, 157–65Google Scholar
Sartwell, C. 1992. “Why Knowledge is Merely True Belief.” Journal of Philosophy 89, 167–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saul, J. 2002. “Speaker Meaning, What is Said, and What is Implicated.” Noûs 36: 2, 228–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, S. 2003. The Things We Mean (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, F. 1994. Socializing Epistemology (Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield)Google Scholar
Schmitt, F. 2002. “Testimonial Justification: The Parity Argument.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33, 385–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, F.2006. “Testimonial Justification and Transindividual Reasons.” In Lackey, J., and Sosa, E., eds. The Epistemology of Testimony (Oxford University Press), 193–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. 1965. “What is a Speech Act?” In Black, M. (ed.) Philosophy in America (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), 221–39. Reprinted in A. Martinich (ed.) The Philosophy of Language 4th edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Segal, G. 1989. “Seeing What is Not There.” Philosophical Review 98, 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shagrir, O. 2001. “Content, Computation and Externalism.” Mind 110, 369–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. 1987. “Evolution of a Mesh between Principles of the Mind and Regularities of the World.” In Dupre, J. (ed.) The Latest on the Best (Cambridge: MIT Press), 251–76Google Scholar
Shepard, R.1992. “The Perceptual Organization of Colors: An Adaptation to Regularities of the Terrestrial World?” In Barlow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J., eds. Adapted Mind (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Shogenji, T. 2006. “A Defense of Reductionism about Testimonial Justification of Beliefs.” Noûs 40: 2, 331–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E. 1991. Knowledge in Perspective: Selected Essays in Epistemology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E.1994. “Testimony and Coherence.” In Matilal, B. K. and Chakrabarti, A., eds. Knowing from Words (Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E.1999. “How to Defeat Opposition to Moore.” In Tomberlin, James (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives, 13: Epistemology (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing, 1988)Google Scholar
Sosa, E. 2001. “Human Knowledge, Animal and Reflective.” Philosophical Studies 106: 3, 193–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E. 2002. “Goldman's Reliabilism and Virtue Epistemology.” Philosophical Topics 29: 1–2Google Scholar
Sosa, E.2004. “Replies.” In Grecs, J. (ed.) Ernest Sosa and his Critics (Oxford: Blackwell), 275–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E. and Bonjour, L. 2003. Epistemic Justification (London: Blackwell)Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition (Oxford: Blackwell)Google Scholar
Stanley, J. 2000. “Context and Logical Form.” Linguistics and Philosophy 23, 391–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J. 2002. “Making it Articulated.” Mind and Language 17, 149–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, L. 1993. “Why Believe What People Say?Synthese 94, 429–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, 1994. “Knowing from Words.” In Matilal, B. K. and Chakrabarti, A., eds. Knowing from Words (Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M., Estbensen, B., and Bennett, R. 1994. “Children's Understanding of Knowledge Acquisition: The Tendency for Children to Report That They Have Always Known What They Have Just Learned.” Child Development 65: 1581–604CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tye, M. 1998. “Externalism and Memory I.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 72 (Supplemental Volume), 77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, P. 1975. Ignorance: A Case for Skepticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Van Cleeve, J. 2005. “Externalism and Disjunctivism.” In Schantz, R. (ed.) The Externalist Challenge (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 481–92Google Scholar
Van Gulick, R. 2005. “Outing the Mind: A Teleopragmatic Perspective.” In Schantz, R. (ed.) The Externalist Challenge (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 255–85Google Scholar
Warfield, T. 1995. “Externalism, Self-Knowledge, and the Irrelevance of Slow Switching”. Analysis 57, 282–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warfield, T. 1998. “A Priori Knowledge of the World.” Philosophical Studies 92: 127–47Google Scholar
Webb, M. O. 1993. “Why I Know About as Much as You: A reply to Hardwig.” Journal of Philosophy 90, 260–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, M. 2003. “Accepting Testimony.” Philosophical Quarterly 53, 256–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welbourne, M. 1979. “The Transmission of Knowledge.” Philosophical Quarterly 29: 114, 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welbourne, M. 1981. “The Community of Knowledge.” Philosophical Quarterly 31, 302–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welbourne, M. 1986. The Community of Knowledge (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press)Google Scholar
Welbourne, M.1994. “Testimony, Knowledge, and Belief.” In Matilal, B. K. and Chakrabarti, A., eds., Knowing From Words (Dordrecht: Kluwer)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, H., Cross, D., and Watson, J. 2001. “Meta-Analysis of Theory of Mind Development. The Truth about False Belief.” Child Development 72, 655–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeless, L., Barraclough, R., and Stewart, R. 1983. “Compliance-Gaining and Power in Persuasion.” In Bostrom, R. N. (ed.) Communication Yearbook 7 (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing), 105–45Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1996. “Knowing and Asserting.” The Philosophical Review 105: 4, 489–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. and Perner, J. 1983. “Beliefs about Beliefs: Representation and Constraining Function of Wrong Beliefs in Young Children's Understanding of Deception.” Cognition 13, 103–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2002. “Truthfulness and Relevance.” Mind 111, 583–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaragoza, M. and Lane, S. 1994. “Source Misattributions and the Suggestibility of Eyewitness Memory.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20, 934–45Google ScholarPubMed
Zaragoza, M. and Mitchell, K. 1996. “Repeated Exposure to Suggestion and the Creation of False Memories.” Psychological Science 7, 294–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeki, S. 1993. A Vision of the Brain (Oxford: Blackwell Scientific)Google Scholar
Adler, J. 1994. “Testimony, Trust, Knowing.” Journal of Philosophy 91, 264–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, J. 1996. “Transmitting Knowledge.” Noûs 30: 1, 99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, J. 1997. “Lying, Deceiving, or Falsely Implicating.” Journal of Philosophy 94: 9, 435–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, W. 1986. “Internalism and Externalism in Epistemology.” Philosophical Topics 14, 179–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. 1973. Belief, Truth, and Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, R. 1988. “Justification, Truth, and Reliability.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49: 1, 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, R. 1993. The Structure of Justification (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Audi, R. 1997. “The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and Justification.” American Philosophical Quarterly 34: 4, 405–22Google Scholar
Bach, K. 1988. “Burge's New Thought Experiment: Back to the Drawing Room.” The Journal of Philosophy 85, 88–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, K. 1994. “Conversational Implicitures.” Mind and Language 9, 24–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, K. 1997a. “Do Belief Reports Report Beliefs?Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78: 3, 215–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, K. 1997b. “The Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction: What It Is and Why It Matters.” Linguistiche Berichte 8, 33–50Google Scholar
Bach, K. and Elugardo, R. 2003. “Conceptual Minimalism and Anti-Individualism: A Reply to Goldberg,” Noûs 37: 1, 151–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, D. and Moses, L. 1996. “The Ontogeny of Social Information Gathering.” Child Development 67, 1915–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Raviv, A., and Brosh, M. 1990. “Perception of Epistemic Authority and Attribution for its Choice as a Function of Knowledge Area and Age.” European Journal of Social Psychology 21, 477–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezuidenhout, A. 1997. “Pragmatics, Semantic Underdetermination and the Referential- Attributive Distinction.” Mind 106, 375–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezuidenhout, A. 1998. “Is Verbal Communication a Purely Preservative Process?Philosophical Review 107, 261–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilgrami, A. 1992. Belief and Meaning (Oxford: Basil Blackwell)Google Scholar
Boghossian, P. 1989. “Content and Self-Knowledge.” Philosophical Topics 17: 1, 5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonjour, L. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Bonjour, L. 1999. In Defense of Pure Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Bonjour, L. and Sosa, E. 2003. Epistemic Justification (London: Blackwell)Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 1983. “Asserting.” Noûs 17, 637–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, R. 1994. Making It Explicit (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Brown, J. 2004. Anti-Individualism and Knowledge (Cambridge: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Burge, T. 1979. “Individualism and the Mental.” Reprinted in Rosenthal, D. (ed.) The Nature of Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), 536–67Google Scholar
Burge, T.1982a. “Other Bodies.” In Woodfield, A. (ed.) Thought and Object (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 97–120Google Scholar
Burge, T. 1982b. “Two Thought Experiments Reviewed.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23: 3, 284–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. 1986. “Intellectual Norms and the Foundations of Mind.” Journal of Philosophy 83, 697–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. 1986b. “Individualism and Psychology.” Philosophical Review 95, 3–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. 1987. “Individualism and Self-Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 85: 11, 649–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T.1988. “Cartesian Error and the Objectivity of Perception.” In Grimm, R. and Merrill, D., Contents of Thought (Tucson: University of Arizona Press)Google Scholar
Burge, T.1989. “Wherein is Language Social?” In George, A. (ed.) Reflections on ChomskyOxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. 1993. “Content Preservation.” Philosophical Review 102: 4, 457–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. 1996. “Our Entitlement to Self-Knowledge.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96, 91–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T. 1997. “Interlocution, Perception, and Memory.” Philosophical Studies 86, 21–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, T.1998. “Memory and Self-Knowledge.” In Ludlow, P. and Martin, N., eds, Externalism and Self-Knowledge (Palo Alto: CSLI Publications), 351–70Google Scholar
Burge, T.1999. “Comprehension and Interpretation.” In Hahn, Lewis (ed.), The Philosophy of Donald Davidson (Chicago: Open Court Press), 229–50Google Scholar
Burge, T. 2003. “Perceptual Entitlement.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67: 3, 503–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brueckner, A. 1997. “Externalism and Memory.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78: 1, 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, A. and Thau, M. 1995. “In Defense of the Hybrid View.” Mind 105, 139–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. 1997. “On an Alleged Connection between Indirect Speech and the Theory of Meaning.” Mind and Language 12, 278–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carston, R. 1988. “Implicature, Explicature, and Truth-Theoretic Semantics.” In Davis, S. (ed.) Pragmatics: A Reader (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 33–51Google Scholar
Carston, R. 2002. “Linguistic Meaning, Communicated Meaning, and Cognitive Pragmatics.” Mind and Language 17, 127–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceci, S., Ross, D., and Toglia, M. 1987. “Age Differences in Suggestibility: Psycholegal Implications.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 117, 38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceci, S. and Bruck, M. 1993. “Suggestibility of the Child Witness: a Historical Review and Synthesis.” Psychological Bulletin 113, 403–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, R. 1977. Theory of Knowledge, 2nd edn (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall)Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1980. Rules and Representations (New York: Columbia University Press)Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use (New York: Praeger)Google Scholar
Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. 1998. “The Extended Mind.” Analysis 58, 7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clément, F., Koenig, M., and Harris, , 2004. “The Ontogenesis of Trust.” Mind and Language 19: 4, 360–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, W. K. 1999. “The Ethics of Belief.” In Ethics of Belief and Other Essays (NY: Prometheus Books, 1999)Google Scholar
Coady, C. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Coady, C. 2002. “Testimony and Intellectual Autonomy.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33, 355–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S. 1984. “Justification and Truth.” Philosophical Studies 46, 279–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study (Oxford: Clarendon Press)Google Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. 1994. “Testimony, Observation and ‘Autonomous Knowledge.’” in Knowing From Words, Matilal, B., and Chakrabarti, A., eds. (Dordrech: Kluwer, 1994), 225–50Google Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. 2002. “Testimony and Intellectual Autonomy,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 33: 2, 355–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conee, E. 2007. “Externally Enhanced Internalism.” In Goldberg, S. (ed.) Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Conee, E. and Feldman, R. 2004. Evidentialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danto, A. 1969. “Semantical Vehicles, Understanding, and Innate Ideas.” In Hook, S. (ed.), Language and Philosophy (New York: New York University Press)Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Davidson, D.1986. “A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs.” In Lepore, E. (ed.) Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 433–46Google Scholar
Davidson, D.1999. “Reply to Tyler Burge.” In Hahn, Lewis (ed.) The Philosophy of Donald Davidson (Chicago: Open Court Press), 251–4Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 2001. Subject, Intersubjective, Objective (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. 2002. “Conversation, Epistemology, and Norms.” Mind and Language 17: 5, 513–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRose, K. 1991. “Epistemic Possibilities.” Philosophical Review 91, 581–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, M. and Harris, , 1990. “The Influence of the Imagination on Reasoning by Young Children.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 8, 305–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. 1982. “A Cognitive Cul-de-Sac.” Mind 91, 109–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, M. 1978. “Frege's Distinction between Sense and Reference.” In Dummett, M., Truth and Other Enigmas (Cambridge: Harvard University Press), 116–44Google Scholar
Dummett, M.1994. “Testimony and Memory.” In Matilal, B. K. and Chakrabarti, A., eds. Knowing from Words (Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 251–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbs, G. 1997. “Can We Take Our Words at Face Value?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56: 3, 499–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, F. 1991. “Must Psychology be Individualistic?Philosophical Review 100, 179–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, F. 1992. “Individualism, Computation, and Perceptual Content.” Mind 101, 443–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, F. 1995. “Computation and Content.” Philosophical Review 104: 2, 181–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, F. 1999. “In Defense of Narrow Mindedness.” Mind and Language 14, 177–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgin, C. 2002. “Take It from Me: The Epistemological Status of Testimony.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 2, 291–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elugardo, R. 1993. “Burge on Content.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53: 2, 367–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. 1982. The Varieties of Reference (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Falvey, K. and Owens, J. 1994. “Externalism, Self-Knowledge, and Skepticism.” Philosophical Review 103: 1, 107–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, , 2000. “The Social Character of Testimonial Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 97: 11, 581–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R. 2004. “In Search of Internalism and Externalism.” In Schantz, R. (ed.) The Externalist Challenge (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 143–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R.Forthcoming: “Epistemological Puzzles about Disagreement.” In Hetherington, S. (ed.) Epistemology Futures (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
Flavell, J. 1979. “Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry.” American Psychologist 34: 906–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. 2002. The Mind Doesn’t Work That Way: The Scopes and Limits of Computational Psychology. Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Foley, R. 1994. “Egoism in Epistemology.” In Schmitt, F. (ed.) Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield), 53–73Google Scholar
Foley, R.2004. “A Trial Separation between the Theory of Knowledge and the Theory of Justified Belief.” In Greco, J. (ed.) Ernest Sosa and his Critics (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers), 59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, E. 1987. “The Epistemology of Testimony.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplemental Vol. 61, 57–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, E.1994. “Against Gullibility.” In Matilal, B. K. and Chakrabarti, A., eds. Knowing from Words (Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 125–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, E. 1995. “Telling and Trusting: Reductionism and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony.” Mind 104, 393–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, E.2003. “Understanding and Knowledge of What is Said.” In Barber, A. (ed.) The Epistemology of Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 325–66Google Scholar
Fricker, E.2006. “Testimony and Epistemic Autonomy.” In Lackey, J. and Sosa, E., eds. The Epistemology of Testimony (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 225–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauker, C. 1991. “Mental Content and the Division of Epistemic Labor.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69: 302–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauker, C. 1994. Thinking Out Loud (Princeton: Princeton University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauker, C. 2001. “Situated Inference versus Conversational Implicature.” Noûs 35, 163–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, J. 1996. “Externalism and Knowledge of Content.” Philosophical Review 105: 3, 287310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (Boston: Houghton Mifflin)Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T. 1991. “How Mental Systems Believe.” American Psychologist 46: 107–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, D. T.1992. “Assent of Man: Mental Representation and the Control of Belief.” In Wegner, D. M. and Pennebaker, J., eds. The Handbook of Mental Control (New York: Prentice-Hall)Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D. S., and Malone, S. 1990. “Understanding the Unbelievable: Some Problems in the Rejection of False Information.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 601–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., Tafarodi, R. W., and Malone, S. 1993. “You Can’t Not Believe Everything you Read.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65, 221–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, J., Gopnik, A., and Heyman, G. 2002. “Source Monitoring Reduces the Suggestibility of Preschool Children.” Psychological Science 13: 3, 288–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, S. 1997. “Self-Ascription, Self-Knowledge, and the Memory Argument.” Analysis 57: 3, 211–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. 1999. “The Relevance of Discriminatory Knowledge of Content,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80: 2, 136–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2000. “The Semantics of Interlocution.” Communication and Cognition 33: 3, 243–80Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2000b. “World-Switching, Word-Ambiguity, and Semantic Intentions,” Analysis 60: 3, 260–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2001. “Testimonially Based Knowledge from False Testimony.” Philosophical Quarterly 51: 205, 512–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2002a. “Do Anti-Individualistic Construals of the Attitudes Capture the Agent's Conceptions?Noûs 36: 4, 597–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2002b. “Reported Speech and the Epistemology of Testimony.” Protosociology 17, 57–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2003a. “Anti-Individualism, Conceptual Omniscience, and Skepticism.”Philosophical Studies 116: 1, 53–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S.2003b. “What do you Know When you Know your Own Thoughts?” In Nuccetelli, S. (ed.), New Essays on Semantic Externalism and Self-Knowledge (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003), 241–56Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2004a. “Radical Interpretation, Understanding, and Testimonial Transmission.”Synthese 138: 3, 387–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S.2004b. “Descriptions, Context-Sensitivity, and the Epistemology of Testimony.” In Sàágua, João (ed.) The Explanation of Human Interpretation. (Lisbon: Colibri Editions, 2004), 473–85Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2005a. “The Dialectical Context of Boghossian's Memory Argument.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35: 1, 135–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2005b. “Testimonial Knowledge from Unsafe Testimony.” Analysis 65: 4, 302–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2005c. “(Non-standard) Lessons from World-Switching Cases,” Philosophia 32: 1, 95–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S.2006. “Reductionism and the Distinctiveness of Testimonial Knowledge.” In Lackey, J., and Sosa, E., eds. The Epistemology of Testimony (Oxford University Press), 127–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S.Forthcoming a. “The Epistemic Utility of What is Said.” In Stainton, R. and Viger, C., eds. Compositionality, Context, and Semantic Values: Essays in Honor of Ernie Lepore. (Springer Verlag)CrossRef
Goldberg, S. 2007a. “Anti-Individualism, Content Preservation, and Discursive Justification.” NoûsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S.Forthcoming b. “How Lucky Can you Get?Synthese
Goldberg, S.Forthcoming c. “The Knowledge Account of Assertion and the Conditions on Testimonial Knowledge.” In Pritchard, D. and Greenough, . eds. Williamson on Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, in preparation)
Goldberg, S. 2007b. “Brown on Discriminability and Self-Knowledge.” Pacific Philosophical QuarterlyGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S.2007c. “Semantic Externalism and Illusions of Epistemic Relevance.” In Goldberg, S. (ed.) Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, in preparation)Google Scholar
Goldberg, S.Unpublished Manuscript. “Justification as the Entitlement to Regard one's Belief as Warranted”
Goldberg, S. and Henderson, D. 2007. “Monitoring and Anti-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony.” Philosophy and Phenomenological ResearchGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 1976. “Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge.” Reprinted in Goldman 1992
Goldman, A. 1980. “The Internalist Conception of Justification.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 1986. Epistemology and Cognition (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 1992. Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences (Cambridge: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A.1999b. “Internalism Exposed.” Reprinted in Goldman 2002
Goldman, A.2001a. “The Unity of the Epistemic Virtues.” In Fairweather, A. and Zagzebski, L., Virtue Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Reprinted in Goldman 2002Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 2001b. “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63: 1, 85–110. Reprinted in Goldman 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 2001c. “Social Routes to Belief and Knowledge.” Reprinted in Goldman 2002Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 2002. Pathways to Knowledge: Public and Private (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 2004. “Group Knowledge vs. Group Rationality: Two Approaches to Social Epistemology.” Episteme 1, 11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A., and Graf, P. 1988. “Knowing How you Know: Young Children's Ability to Identify and Remember the Sources of Their Beliefs.” Child Development 59: 1366–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, P. 1997. “What is Testimony?The Philosophical Quarterly 47: 187, 227–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, P. 1999. “Transferring Knowledge.” Noûs 34, 131–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, P. 2000a. “Conveying Information.” Synthese 123: 3, 365–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, P. 2000b. “The Reliability of Testimony.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61: 3, 695–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, J. 2000. Putting Skeptics in their Place (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greco, J.2004. “Knowledge as Credit for True Belief.” In DePaul, Michael and Zagzebski, Linda, eds. Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1989. “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Grundmann, A. 2004. “Counterexamples to Epistemic Externalism Revisited.” In Schantz, R. (ed.) The Externalist Challenge (Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, S. 1993. Evidence and Inquiry (Oxford: Basil Blackwell)Google Scholar
Hardwig, J. 1991. “The Role of Trust in Knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 88, 693–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, , 2002. “Checking our sources: The Origins of Trust in Testimony.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33: 2, 315–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heal, J. 1998. “Externalism and Memory II.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 72 (Supplemental Volume), 95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heck, R. 1995. “The Sense of Communication.” Mind 104, 79–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heck, R. 1996. “Communication and Knowledge: A Rejoinder to Byrne and Thau.” Mind 105: 139–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, D. and Horgan, T. 2000. “Iceberg Epistemology.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61: 3, 497–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, D. and Horgan, T.Forthcoming. “The Ins and Outs of Transglobal Reliability.” In Goldberg, S. (ed.) Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
Heyman, G. and Legare, C. forthcoming. “Children's Evaluation of Sources of Information about Traits.” Developmental Psychology
Horgan, T., and Tienson, J. 1995. “Connectionism and the Commitments of Folk Psychology.” In Tomberlin, J. (ed.) AI, Connectionism, and Philosophical Psychology, (Ridgeview: Atascadero)Google Scholar
Horgan, T., and Tienson, J. 1996. Connectionism and the Philosophy of Psychology. Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Hubel, D. 1995. Eye, Brain, Vision (New York: W. H. Freeman)Google Scholar
Insole, C. 2000. “Seeing Off the Local Threat to Irreducible Knowledge by Testimony.” Philosophical Quarterly 50: 198, 44–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, J. 1994. “The Role of Comprehension.” In Matilal, B. K. and Chakrabarti, A., eds. Knowing from Words (Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 163–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. 2005. “On an Argument from Properties of Words to Broad Content.” In Schantz, R. (ed.) The Externalist Challenge (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 319–27Google Scholar
Kelly, T. 2005. “The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement.” In Hawthorne, J., and Gendler, T., eds. Oxford Studies in Epistemology: Volume 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Koenig, M., Clément, F., and Harris, , 2004. “Trust in Testimony: Children's Use of True and False Statements.” Psychological Science 15: 10, 694–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenig, M., and Echols, C. 2003. “Infants’ Understanding of False Labeling Events: The Referential Roles of Words and the Speakers who Use Them.” Cognition 87, 179–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, H. 1988. “How Internal Can You Get?” Reprinted in Kornblith 2001
Kornblith, H.2001. Epistemology: Internalism and Externalism. Kornblith, H. (ed.) (London: Blackwell)Google Scholar
Kutsch, M. 2002a. “Testimony in Communitarian Epistemology.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 33Google Scholar
Kutsch, M. 2002b. Knowledge By Agreement: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvanvig, J. 1996. Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honor of Plantinga's Theory of Knowledge. (Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield)Google Scholar
Kvanvig, J.2003. The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding (New York: Cambridge University Press)
Lackey, J. 1999. “Testimonial Knowledge and Transmission.” The Philosophical Quarterly 49: 197, 471–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. 2003. “A Minimal Expression of Non-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony.” Noûs 37: 4, 706–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. 2005. “Testimony and the Infant/Child Objection.” Philosophical Studies 126: 163–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J.2006. “It Takes Two to Tango.” In Lackey, J. and Sosa, E., eds. The Epistemology of Testimony (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 160–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J.Forthcoming a. “Learning From Words.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Lackey, J.Forthcoming b. “Why We Don’t Deserve Credit for Everything We Know.” Synthese
Lackey, J.Unpublished Manuscript. “Assertion without Knowledge”
Lampinen, J. and Smith, V. 1995. “The Incredible (and Sometimes Incredulous) Child Witness: Child Eyewitnesses’ Sensitivity to Source Credibility Cues.” Journal of Applied Psychology 80: 5, 621–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, K. 1981. “A Self Profile.” In Bogdan, R. (ed.) Keith Lehrer. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 3–104Google Scholar
Lehrer, K.1989. “Knowledge Reconsidered.” In Clay, M. and Lehrer, K., eds. Knowledge and Skepticism (Boulder: Westview Press)Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1975. “Language and Languages.” In Gunderson, K. (ed.) Language, Mind, and Knowledge (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), 3–35Google Scholar
Loar, B. 1988. “Social Content and Psychological Content.” In Grimm, R. and Merrill, D., eds., Contents of Thought (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), 99–110Google Scholar
Loftus, E., and Ketchum, K. 1991. Witness for the Defense: The Accused, the Eyewitness and the Expert who Puts Memory on Trial (New York: St. Martin's Press)Google Scholar
Ludlow, P. 1995. “Externalism, Self-Knowledge, and the Prevalence of Slow Switching.” Analysis 55: 1, 45–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, D. and Keil, F. 2002. “Early Understanding of the Division of Cognitive Labor.” Child Development 73: 1073–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, J. 1997. “Testimony, Induction, and Folk Psychology.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75: 2, 163–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. 1980. “Meaning, Communication, and Knowledge” Reprinted in McDowell 1998
McDowell, J.1981. “Anti-Realism and the Epistemology of Understanding.” Reprinted in McDowell 1998
McDowell, J.1994. “Knowledge by Hearsay.” Reprinted in McDowell 1998
McDowell, J. 1998. Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
McGinn, C. 1984. “The Concept of Knowledge.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 9, 529–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinsey, M. 1994. “Individuating Beliefs.” In Tomberlin, J. (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives 8: Logic and Language. Ridgeview: AtascaderoGoogle Scholar
McKinsey, M. 1999. “The Semantics of Belief Ascriptions.” Noûs 33: 4, 519–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B. and Tye, M. 1998. “Is Content-Externalism Compatible with Privileged Access?Philosophical Review 107: 3, 349–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinich, A. P. 2001 (ed.). The Philosophy of Language, 4th edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Millgram, E. 1997. Practical Induction (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Mills, C. and Keil, F. 2004. “Knowing the Limits of One's Understanding: The Development of an Awareness of an Illusion of Explanatory Depth.” Psychological Science 87: 1–32Google ScholarPubMed
Millikan, R. 1995. White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice (Cambridge: MIT Press)Google Scholar
Millikan, R.2004. “Existence Proof for a Viable Externalism.” In Schantz, R. (ed.) The Externalist Challenge (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 227–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, , Robinson, E., Nye, R., and Isaacs, J. 1997. “When Speech Conflicts with Seeing: Young Children's Understanding of Informational Priority.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 64, 276–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, , 1993. “Supervenience and Computational Explanation in Vision Theory.” Philosophy of Science 60, 86–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R. 2001. Invariances: The Structure of the Objective World (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
O’Neill, D., Astington, J., and Flavell, J. 1992. “Young Children's Understanding of the Role that Sensory Experiences Play in Knowledge Acquisition.” Child Development 63, 474–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Neill, D., and Gopnik, A. 1991. “Young Children's Ability to Identify the Sources of their Beliefs.” Developmental Psychology 27, 390–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, S. 1990. “The Explanatory Role of Belief Ascriptions.” Philosophical Studies 59, 313–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pea, R. 1982. “Origins of Verbal Logic: Spontaneous Denials by Two- and Three-Year-Olds.” Journal of Child Language 9, 597–626CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peacocke, C. 2004a. “Explaining Perceptual Entitlement.” In Schantz, R. (ed.) The Externalist Challenge (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 441–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, C. 2004b. The Realm of Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Pettit, D. 2002. “Why Knowledge is Unnecessary for Understanding Language.” Mind 111: 443, 519–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. 1997. How the Mind Works (New York: Norton)Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1993a. Warrant: The Current Debate (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1993b. Warrant and Proper Function (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. 2004. “The Epistemology of Testimony.” Philosophical Issues 14, 326–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. 2005. Epistemic Luck (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.” In Mind, Language, and Knowledge: Philosophical Papers, Volume II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
Putnam, H.1996. “Introduction.” In Pessin, A. and Goldberg, S., eds. The Twin Earth Chronicles (Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe), xv–xxiiGoogle Scholar
Recanati, F. 1989. “The Pragmatics of What is Said.” Mind and Language 4: 4, 295–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, F. 2002. “Does Linguistic Communication Rest on Inference?Mind and Language 17: 1/2, 105–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, T. 1872/1993. The Complete Works of Thomas Reid. Hamilton, WilliamSir (ed.) (Edinburgh: Maclachlan and Stewart)Google Scholar
Richards, C. and Sanderson, J. 1999. “The Role of the Imagination in Facilitating Deductive Reasoning in 2-, 3-, and 4-year-olds.” Cognition 72: B1–B9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, E., Champion, H., and Mitchell, , 1999. “Children's Ability to Infer Utterance Veracity from Speaker Informedness.” Developmental Psychology 35, 535–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, E., Mitchell, , and Nye, R. 1995. “Young Children's Treating of Utterances as Unreliable Sources of Knowledge.” Journal of Child Language 22, 663–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, E., and Whitcombe, E. 2003. “Children's Suggestibility in Relation to their Understanding of Sources of Knowledge.” Child Development 74, 48–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, A. 1986. “Why Do We Believe what We Are Told?Ratio 28: 1, 69–88Google Scholar
Ross, J. 1975. “Testimonial Evidence.” In Lehrer,, K. ed. Analysis and Metaphysics: Essays in Honor of R. M. Chisholm (Dordrecht: Reidel), 35–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberg, K.Simourd, L., and Moore, D. 1989. “Children's Use of a Verbal-Nonverbal Consistency Principle to Infer Truth and Lying.” Child Development 60, 309–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, B. 1924/1993. The Philosophy of Logical Atomism (La Salle, IL: Open Court)Google Scholar
Sabbagh, M. and Baldwin, D. 2001. “Learning Words from Knowledgeable versus Ignorant Speakers: Links between Preschoolers’ Theory of Mind and Semantic Development.” Child Development 72, 1054–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sartwell, C. 1991. “Knowledge is Merely True Belief.” American Philosophical Quarterly 28, 157–65Google Scholar
Sartwell, C. 1992. “Why Knowledge is Merely True Belief.” Journal of Philosophy 89, 167–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saul, J. 2002. “Speaker Meaning, What is Said, and What is Implicated.” Noûs 36: 2, 228–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, S. 2003. The Things We Mean (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, F. 1994. Socializing Epistemology (Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield)Google Scholar
Schmitt, F. 2002. “Testimonial Justification: The Parity Argument.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33, 385–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, F.2006. “Testimonial Justification and Transindividual Reasons.” In Lackey, J., and Sosa, E., eds. The Epistemology of Testimony (Oxford University Press), 193–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. 1965. “What is a Speech Act?” In Black, M. (ed.) Philosophy in America (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), 221–39. Reprinted in A. Martinich (ed.) The Philosophy of Language 4th edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Segal, G. 1989. “Seeing What is Not There.” Philosophical Review 98, 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shagrir, O. 2001. “Content, Computation and Externalism.” Mind 110, 369–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. 1987. “Evolution of a Mesh between Principles of the Mind and Regularities of the World.” In Dupre, J. (ed.) The Latest on the Best (Cambridge: MIT Press), 251–76Google Scholar
Shepard, R.1992. “The Perceptual Organization of Colors: An Adaptation to Regularities of the Terrestrial World?” In Barlow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J., eds. Adapted Mind (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Shogenji, T. 2006. “A Defense of Reductionism about Testimonial Justification of Beliefs.” Noûs 40: 2, 331–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E. 1991. Knowledge in Perspective: Selected Essays in Epistemology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E.1994. “Testimony and Coherence.” In Matilal, B. K. and Chakrabarti, A., eds. Knowing from Words (Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E.1999. “How to Defeat Opposition to Moore.” In Tomberlin, James (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives, 13: Epistemology (Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing, 1988)Google Scholar
Sosa, E. 2001. “Human Knowledge, Animal and Reflective.” Philosophical Studies 106: 3, 193–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E. 2002. “Goldman's Reliabilism and Virtue Epistemology.” Philosophical Topics 29: 1–2Google Scholar
Sosa, E.2004. “Replies.” In Grecs, J. (ed.) Ernest Sosa and his Critics (Oxford: Blackwell), 275–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E. and Bonjour, L. 2003. Epistemic Justification (London: Blackwell)Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition (Oxford: Blackwell)Google Scholar
Stanley, J. 2000. “Context and Logical Form.” Linguistics and Philosophy 23, 391–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J. 2002. “Making it Articulated.” Mind and Language 17, 149–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, L. 1993. “Why Believe What People Say?Synthese 94, 429–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, 1994. “Knowing from Words.” In Matilal, B. K. and Chakrabarti, A., eds. Knowing from Words (Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M., Estbensen, B., and Bennett, R. 1994. “Children's Understanding of Knowledge Acquisition: The Tendency for Children to Report That They Have Always Known What They Have Just Learned.” Child Development 65: 1581–604CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tye, M. 1998. “Externalism and Memory I.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 72 (Supplemental Volume), 77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, P. 1975. Ignorance: A Case for Skepticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Van Cleeve, J. 2005. “Externalism and Disjunctivism.” In Schantz, R. (ed.) The Externalist Challenge (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 481–92Google Scholar
Van Gulick, R. 2005. “Outing the Mind: A Teleopragmatic Perspective.” In Schantz, R. (ed.) The Externalist Challenge (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 255–85Google Scholar
Warfield, T. 1995. “Externalism, Self-Knowledge, and the Irrelevance of Slow Switching”. Analysis 57, 282–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warfield, T. 1998. “A Priori Knowledge of the World.” Philosophical Studies 92: 127–47Google Scholar
Webb, M. O. 1993. “Why I Know About as Much as You: A reply to Hardwig.” Journal of Philosophy 90, 260–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, M. 2003. “Accepting Testimony.” Philosophical Quarterly 53, 256–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welbourne, M. 1979. “The Transmission of Knowledge.” Philosophical Quarterly 29: 114, 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welbourne, M. 1981. “The Community of Knowledge.” Philosophical Quarterly 31, 302–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welbourne, M. 1986. The Community of Knowledge (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press)Google Scholar
Welbourne, M.1994. “Testimony, Knowledge, and Belief.” In Matilal, B. K. and Chakrabarti, A., eds., Knowing From Words (Dordrecht: Kluwer)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellman, H., Cross, D., and Watson, J. 2001. “Meta-Analysis of Theory of Mind Development. The Truth about False Belief.” Child Development 72, 655–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wheeless, L., Barraclough, R., and Stewart, R. 1983. “Compliance-Gaining and Power in Persuasion.” In Bostrom, R. N. (ed.) Communication Yearbook 7 (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing), 105–45Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1996. “Knowing and Asserting.” The Philosophical Review 105: 4, 489–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. and Perner, J. 1983. “Beliefs about Beliefs: Representation and Constraining Function of Wrong Beliefs in Young Children's Understanding of Deception.” Cognition 13, 103–28CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. 2002. “Truthfulness and Relevance.” Mind 111, 583–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaragoza, M. and Lane, S. 1994. “Source Misattributions and the Suggestibility of Eyewitness Memory.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20, 934–45Google ScholarPubMed
Zaragoza, M. and Mitchell, K. 1996. “Repeated Exposure to Suggestion and the Creation of False Memories.” Psychological Science 7, 294–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeki, S. 1993. A Vision of the Brain (Oxford: Blackwell Scientific)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Sanford C. Goldberg, University of Kentucky
  • Book: Anti-Individualism
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487521.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Sanford C. Goldberg, University of Kentucky
  • Book: Anti-Individualism
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487521.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Sanford C. Goldberg, University of Kentucky
  • Book: Anti-Individualism
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487521.011
Available formats
×