Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T12:11:24.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Contested rules and shifting boundaries: International standard-setting in accounting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Marie-Laure Djelic
Affiliation:
ESSEC, France
Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson
Affiliation:
Uppsala universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this chapter we set out to investigate the emergence and development of international standard-setting in the field of accounting, with particular reference to financial reporting. Beyond technicalities and dry figures, financial reporting standards shape the categories through which corporate governance actors evaluate each other; thereby also influencing strategies and decision-making (Power 1997).

Historically, the meaning and understanding of accounting standards has been contextualized in national accounting traditions and systems. However, the last decades have seen a proliferation of activities and initiatives to make financial reporting standards comparable across national borders. Developments in accounting are part of a broader movement towards global ordering by means of standardization (Ahrne and Brunsson ch. 4; Drori and Meyer ch. 2). One common characteristic of international standardization is the lack of sanctioning power (cf Jacobsson and Sahlin-Andersson ch. 12). Thus, standard-setting organizations have to struggle for voluntary recognition of their rules. A second common feature is the degree of translation (Czarniawska and Joerges 1996) involved in international standardsetting. Actors that engage in international standard-setting contribute their contextualized interests, perceptions and strategies. The outcome of the standard-setting process is a set of highly formalized rules that need re-contextualization to be implemented. In consequence, struggles around international standards are expected to be quite significant (Brunsson and Jacobsson 2000; Tamm Hallström 2004).

Type
Chapter
Information
Transnational Governance
Institutional Dynamics of Regulation
, pp. 266 - 286
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×