Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T16:58:42.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - A systemic perspective on crime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

By
Mario Bunge
Edited by
Per-Olof H. Wikström  and
Robert J. Sampson
Mario Bunge
Affiliation:
Professor Department of Philosophy McGill University, Montreal
Per-Olof H. Wikström
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Robert J. Sampson
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Crime is the most harmful and yet the least understood of any kind of deviant behavior. A possible reason for this is that it comes in very many shapes, from plagiarism to fraud, from deception to betrayal, from shoplifting to corporate swindle and from homicide to mass murder. Another reason for our limited understanding of crime is the traditional view that it is a sin to be punished rather than prevented. This retributive attitude, rooted in the primitive desire for revenge, blocks both the search for crime mechanisms and the design of effective prevention and rehabilitation programs. Furthermore, it makes crime an exclusive subject for psychology, the law, morals, or religion, and thus it isolates criminology from the social sciences and technologies instead of placing it squarely in their midst.

The social sciences, in particular anthropology, social psychology, sociology, and history, teach us several important lessons about crime. One of them is that there are many types of crime besides theft and homicide. For instance, there are environmental crimes such as pollution, political crimes such as the suppression of dissent, and cultural crimes such as ideological censorship. Another lesson is that whoever is really interested in reducing the delinquency rate, instead of waging vociferous but ineffective “wars on crime,” should try and uncover the causes of crime with a view to redesigning social policies instead of focusing on punishment, particularly since the traditional jail has proved to be a school of crime.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Explanation of Crime
Context, Mechanisms and Development
 , pp. 8 - 30
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, Robert (1992). “Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency.” Criminology 30: 47–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Steven W., Bechara, Antoine, Damasio, Hanna, Tranel, Daniel, & Damasio, Antonio R. (1999). “Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex.” Nature Neuroscience 2: 1032–1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atran, Scott (2003). “Genesis of suicide terrorism.” Science 299: 1534–1539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, Gary (1970). “Crime and punishment: an economic approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76: 211–233.Google Scholar
Bottoms, Anthony E. (1994). “Environmental criminology.” In Maguire, M., Morgan, R., & Reiner, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Braga, Anthony A., Kennedy, David M., Waring, Elin J. & Piehl, Anne Morrison (2001). “Problem-oriented policing, deterrence, and youth violence: an evaluation of Boston's Operation Ceasefire.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 38: 195–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braudel, Fernand (1969). Ecrits sur l'histoire. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Brower, M. C. & Price, B. H. (2001). “Neuropsychiatry of frontal lobe dysfunction in violent and criminal behavior: a critical review.” Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgical Psychiatry 71: 720–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunge, Mario (1974). “The concept of social structure.” in Leinfellner, W. and Köhler, W. (eds.), Developments in the Methodology of Social Science. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunge, Mario (1979a).“A systems concept of society: beyond individualism and holism.” Theory and Decision 10: 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunge, Mario (1979b). A World of Systems. Treatise on Basic Philosophy, vol. IV. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario (1983a). Exploring the World. Treatise on Basic Philosophy, vol. V. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario (1983b). Understanding the World. Treatise on Basic Philosophy, vol. VI. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario (1989). Ethics: The Good and the Right. Treatise on Basic Philosophy, vol. VIII. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunge, Mario (1999). The Sociology–Philosophy Connection. New Brunswick, NJ: Transation.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario (2003). Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative Novelty and the Unity of Knowledge.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Bunge, Mario (2004). “How does it work?”Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34: 182–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunge, Mario & Máximo, García-Sucre (1976). “Differentiation, participation, and cohesion.” Quality and Quantity 10: 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caspi, Avshalom, McClay, Joseph, Moffitt, Terrie E., Mill, Jonathan, Martin, Judy, Craig, Ian W., Taylor, Alan, & Poulton, Richie (2004). “Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children.” Science 297: 851–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlbäck, Olof (2003). Analyzing Rational Crime – Models and Methods. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm (1959) [1883]. “Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften. In Gesammelte Schriften, vol. I. Stuttgart: Teubner; Göttingen: Vanderhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1988) [1901]. Les règles de la méthode sociologique, 2nd edn. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Farrington, David P. (1996). “The explanation and prevention of youthful offending.” In David, J. Hawkins (ed.), Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1984). The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. David, ed. (1996). Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F. & Oberschall, Anthony R. (1965). “Max Weber and empirical social research.” American Sociological Review 30: 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, Richard (2000). It Ain't Necessarily So. New York: New York Review of Books.Google Scholar
Loeber, Rolf (1996). “Developmental continuity, change, and pathways in male juvenile delinquency problem behaviors and delinquency.” In David, J. Hawkins (ed.), Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loeber, Rolf & Le Blanc, Marc (1990). “Toward a developmental criminology.” In Tonry, M. & Morris, N. (eds.), Crime and Justice vol. XII. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lomnitz, Larissa (1977). Networks and Marginality: Life in a Mexican Shantytown. San Francisco: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, C. (1991). “The methodologies of social history: a Critical survey and defense of structurism.” History and Theory 30: QJ;180–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, Douglas S. (2001). “Segregation and violent crime in Urban America.” In Anderson, E. & Massey, D. S. (eds.), Problems of the Century: Racial Stratification in the United States. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1976). Sociological Ambivalence and other Essays. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Moffitt, Terrie E. (1993). “Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy.” Psychological Review 100: 674–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, Odling-Smee F., Kevin, Laland N. & Marcus, Feldman W. (2003). Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Matthew, Robinson B. (2004). Why Crime? An Integrated Systems Theory of Antisocial Behaviour. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Richard (2004). “The case of the unsolved crime.” Scientific American 290 (2): 82–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sagemore, Marc (2004). Understanding Terror Networks. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Robert, Sampson J. & Laub, John H. (1993). Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, Robert J., Raudenbush, Stephen W., & Earls, Felton (1997). “Neighbourhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy.” Science 277: 918–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
John, Sutton R. (2004). “The political economy of imprisonment in affluent Western democracies, 1960–1990.” American Sociological Review 69: 170–189.Google Scholar
Thornberry, Terence P. (1987). “Toward an interactional theory of delinquency.” Criminology 25: 863–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Trigger G. (2003). Understanding Early Civilizations.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1976) [1922]. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der Verstehende Soziologie, 5th edn., 3 vols. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Wikström, Per-Olof H. (2004a). “Crime as alternative.” In McCord, J. (ed.), Beyond Empiricism: Institutions and Intentions in the Study of Crime. Advances in Criminological Theory 13. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Wikström, Per-Olof H (2004b). “The social origins of pathways in crime.” In Farrington, D. P. (ed.), Integrated Developmental and Life Course Theories of Offending. Advances in Criminological Theory 14. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Wikström, Per-Olof H. & Sampson, Robert J. (2003). “Social mechanisms of community influences on crime and pathways in criminality.” In Lahey, Benjamin B., Moffitt, Terrie E., & Caspi, Avshalom (eds.), Causes of Conduct Disorder and Serious Juvenile Delinquency. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Adam, Wilkins S. (2002). The Evolution of Developmental Pathways. Sunderland MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. & Herrnstein, Richard J. (1985). Crime and Human Nature. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×