Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T13:18:08.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2009

James Georgas
Affiliation:
University of Athens, Greece
John W. Berry
Affiliation:
Queen's University, Ontario
Fons J. R. van de Vijver
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Brabant, The Netherlands
Çigdem Kagitçibasi
Affiliation:
Koç University, Istanbul
Ype H. Poortinga
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Families Across Cultures
A 30-Nation Psychological Study
, pp. 508 - 546
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberle, D. F., Cohen, A. K., Davis, A., Levy, M., and Sutton, F. X. (1950). Functional prerequisites of society. Ethics, 60: 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acar, F. (1991). Women in academic science careers in Turkey. In Stolte-Heiskanen, V., Acar, F., Ananieva, N. and Gaudart, D. (eds.), Women in science: Token women or gender equality?, pp. 147–171. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Achoui, M. (1983). “The impact of ideology and organizational power on communication: A comparative perspective.” Unpublished doctoral thesis, Rensselear Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York.
Adeniyi, A. M. and Mivanyi, Y. J. (1999, August). Nutrition, child development and single parenthood in Kaduna metropolis, Kaduna, Nigeria. Paper presented at the IXth European Conference on Developmental Psychology, island of Spetses, Greece.
Aerts, E. (1993). Bringing the institution back in. In Cowan, P. A., Field, D., Hansen, D. A., Skonick, A. and Swanson, G. E. (eds.), Family, self, and society, pp. 3–41. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ahmad, M. B. (1982). The Muslim family laws. Lahore: Kausar Brothers.Google Scholar
Ahnert, L., Krätzig, S., Meischner, T., and Schmidt, A. (1994). Sozialisationskonzepte für Kleinkinder: Wirkungen tradierter Erziehungsvorstellungen und staatssozialistischer Erziehungsdoktrinen im intra- und interkulturellen Ost–West-Vergleich [Socialization concepts of infants: Effects of traditional pedagogic concepts and governmental socialist pedagogic doctrines in an intra- and intercultural east–west comparison]. In Trommdsdorff, G. (ed.), Psychologische Aspekte des sozio-politischen Wandels in Ostdeutschland, pp. 94–110. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahnert, L., Meischner, T., and Schmidt, A. (1995). Äquivalenzen in frühkindlichen Interaktionsmustern: Ein Vergleich von russischen und deutschen Mutter–Kind-Dyaden [Similarities in early interactional patterns: A comparison of Russian and German mother–child dyads]. In Trommsdorff, G. (ed.), Kindheit und Jugend in verschiedenen Kulturen, pp. 65–81. Weinheim/Munich: Juventa Verlag.Google Scholar
Akande, A. (2000). School-related fears in children and their relationship to worries and anxiety in the twenty-first century Southern Africa. Studia Psychologica, 42: 303–360.Google Scholar
Akande, A. (2002). “Lifeworlds in southern African states.” Unpublished paper, University of Bath.
Akande, A.(2004). “Seek and ye shall find: Rethinking higher education in (South) Africa–Quo Vadis?” Unpublished paper, Institute of Research and Consultancy, South Africa.
Al-Badran, K. and Rwished, F. (1989). An empirical study for marriage contract in the eastern region of the Saudi Arabia Kingdom. Studies and issues from the Arab Gulf society [Arabic text] (Social and Labor Studies Series, N14, The Executive Bureau of the Ministry Council of Labor and Social Affairs of the Arab Gulf States Cooperation Counsel). Bahrain: Al-Manama.
Al-Khalifa, A. H. (1990). Social factors impact on population distribution in Riyadh City neighborhoods: An empirical study [Arabic text]. Riyadh: Center of Crime Research.Google Scholar
Al-Khariji, A. (1983). Systems of the Muslim society with application on the Saudi society [Arabic text]. Jeddah: Ramta.Google Scholar
Al-Masa'ad, A. (1995). “Social change and neighborhood relationship: An empirical study in Al-Malz area in Riyadh City” [Arabic text]. Unpublished master's thesis. College of Social Sciences, Al-Imam Saud University.
Al-Saif, M. I. (1997). Introduction to the study of Saudi society [Arabic text]. Riyadh: Al-Khariji.Google Scholar
Alberdi, I. (1995). Informe sobre la situación de la familia en España [Report on the situation of the family in Spain]. Madrid: Ministerio de Asuntos Sociales.Google Scholar
Alberdi, I.(1999). La nueva familia española [The new Spanish family]. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
Albrow, M. and King, E. (1990). Globalization, knowledge and society: Readings from international sociology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Alcock, J. (1998). Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach. Sunderland, MS: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Alexandrova, T. A. (1990). Koe-chto o dedoushkah [Something about grandparents]. Moscow: Znanie.Google Scholar
Allan, G. (1985). Family life. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Allik, J. and McCrae, R. R. (2004). Towards a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35: 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amado, G. and Vinagre-Brasil, H. (1991). Organizational behaviors and cultural context: The Brazilian “jeitinho.”International Studies of Management and Organization, 2: 38–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amani, M. (2001). General demography of Iran. [In Farsi]. Tehran: Samt.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. (1971). Family structure in XIXth century Lancashire. Cambridge Studies in Sociology no. 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, P. (1990). Economic conditions and family structures. In Baker, M. (ed.), Families: Changing trends in Canada, 2nd edn., pp. 67–92. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
Arriagada, I. (2002). Cambios y desigualdad en las familias latinoamericanas [Changes and inequality in the Latin American families]. Revista de la CEPAL, 77: 143–161.Google Scholar
Asante, M. K. (1993). Malcom X as cultural hero and other Afrocentric essays. New Jersey: Africa World Press.Google Scholar
Ataca, B. (1992). “An investigation of variance in fertility due to sex-related differentiation in child-rearing practices.” Unpublished master's thesis, Bogazici University, Istanbul.
Ataca, B., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., and Diri, A. (2005). The Turkish family and the value of children: Trends over time. In Trommsdorff, G. and Nauck, B., (eds.), The value of children in cross-cultural perspectives. Berlin: Pabst.Google Scholar
Ataca, B. and Sunar, D. (1999). Continuity and change in Turkish urban family life. Psychology and Developing Societies, 11: 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attalides, M. (1981). Social change and urbanization in Cyprus: A study of Nicosia. Nicosia, Cyprus: Zavallis Press.Google Scholar
Attias-Donfut, C., Lapierre, N., and Segalen, M. (2002). Le nouvel esprit de famille [The new family spirit]. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Attias-Donfut, C. and Segalen, M. (1998). Grands-parents: La famille à travers les generations [Grandparents: The family across generations]. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Avort, A., , Cuyvers P., and Hoog, K. (1996). Het Nederlandse gezinsleven aan het einde van de twintigste eeuw [Family life in the Netherlands at the end of the twentieth century]. The Hague: Nederlandse Gezinsraad.Google Scholar
Aydin, B. and Oztutuncu, F. (2001). Examination of adolescents' negative thoughts, depressive mood, and family environment. Adolescence, 36: 77–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Azuma, H. (1986). Why study child development in Japan. In Stevenson, H., Azuma, H., and Hakuta, K. (eds.), Child development and education in Japan, pp. 3–12. New York: W H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Badan Pusat Statistik, Indonesia (1996). Survei penduduk antar sensus 1995. Jakarta, Indonesia: BPS-Statistics Indonesia.
Bainame, K., Letamo, G., and Majelantle, R. G. (2002). “The effects of rural inequalities of fertility and migration in Botswana.” Unpublished paper, Gaborone, Botswana.
Baker, M. and Dryden, J. (1993). Families in Canadian society. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
Baldi, S., Perie, M., Skidmore, D., Greenberg, E., and Hahn, C. (2001). Highlights of US results from the International IEA Civic Education Study (CivEd). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, USA. Retrieved from http://www.nces.ed.gov/timss.
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bales, R. F. and Slater, P. (1955). Roles differentiation in small decision-making groups. In Parsons, T. and Bales, R. F. (eds.), Family, socialization and interaction process, pp. 259–306. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ballard, R. and Kalra, V. S. (1994). The ethnic dimensions of the 1991 census: A preliminary report. Manchester: Manchester Census Group, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Bank of Botswana (2001). “Botswana.” Unpublished report, Government Press, Gaborone, Botswana.
Barnett, R. C. and Shen, Y. (1997). Gender, high- and low-schedule control, housework tasks, and psychological distress: A study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Family Issues, 18: 403–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, H., Child, I., and Bacon, M. (1959). Relations of child training to subsistence economy. American Anthropologist, 61: 51–63.Google Scholar
Basaran, F. A. (1974). Psychosocial development: A study of children ages 7–11 [Turkish text]. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara University Press. (Reprint from Research VII, 1969).Google Scholar
Bastug, S. (2002). Household and family in Turkey: An historical perspective. In Ozdalga, E. and Liljestrom, R. (eds.), Autonomy and dependence in family: Turkey and Sweden in critical perspective, pp. 99–115. Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute.Google Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1980). New directions in socialization research. American Psychologist, 35: 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawin-Legros, B. (1988). Familles, mariage, divorce: Une sociologie des comportements familiaux contemporains [Families, marriage, divorce: Sociology of contemporary family behavior]. Liège, Belgium: Pierre Mardaga.Google Scholar
Beiser, M., Hou, F., Hyman, I., and Tousignant, M. (2002). Poverty, family process and the mental health of immigrant children in Canada. American Journal of Public Health, 92: 220–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beishon, S., Modood, T., and Virdee, S. (1998). Ethnic minority families. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Bender, D. R. (1967). A refinement of the concept of household: Families, co-residence, and domestic functions. American Anthropologist, 69: 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, R. (1967). Tradition and modernity reconsidered. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 9: 292–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, V. L. and Schrader, S. S. (1982). Parent–child relations. In Mangen, D. J. and Peterson, W. A. (eds.), Research instruments in social gerontology, vol. 2, pp. 115–128. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (1976). The ecological transition. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Beny, R., Nasr, S. M., and Bakhtiar, M. (1975). Iran, the bridge of turquoise. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart Ltd.Google Scholar
Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1999). La construcción social de la realidad [The social construction of reality]. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.Google Scholar
Berghe, P. L. (1979). Human family systems: An evolutionary view. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Berik, G. (1995). Towards an understanding of gender hierarchy in Turkey: A comparative analysis of carpet-weaving villages. In Tekeli, S. (ed.), Women in modern Turkish society: A reader, pp. 112–127. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Berkner, L. K. (1975). The use and misuse of census data for the historical analysis of family structure. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 5: 721–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernardes, J. (1997). Family studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1966). Temne and Eskimo perceptual skills. International Journal of Psychology, 1: 207–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W.(1967). Independence and conformity in subsistence-level societies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7: 415–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W.(1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4: 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1975). An ecological approach to cross-cultural psychology. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 30: 51–84.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1976). Human ecology and cognitive style: Comparative studies in cultural and psychological adaptation. New York: Sage/Halsted.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1979). A cultural ecology of social behavior. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 12, pp. 177–206. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1985). Cultural psychology and ethnic psychology. In Reyes, I.Lagunes, and Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), From a different perspective, pp. 3–15. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1994a). Ecology of individualism and collectivism. In Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Choi, S.-C., and Yoon, G. (eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications, pp. 77–84. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1994b). An ecological approach to cultural and ethnic psychology. In Trickett, E. (ed.), Human Diversity, pp. 115–141. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarPubMed
Berry, J. W. (1995). The descendants of a model. Culture and Psychology, 1: 373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. (2000). Cross-cultural psychology: A symbiosis of cultural and comparative approaches. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3: 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. Bennett, J. A., and Denny. P. (2000, July). Ecology, culture and cognitive processing. Paper presented at the fifteenth Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Pultusk, Poland.
Berry, J. W., Dasen, P. R., and Witkin, H. A. (1983). Developmental theories in cross-cultural perspective. In Alder, L. (ed.), Cross-cultural research at issue, pp. 13–21. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. and Kalin, R. (2000). Multicultural policy and social psychology: The Canadian experience. In Renshon, S. and Duckitt, J. (eds.), Political psychology: Cultural and cross-cultural foundations, pp. 263–284. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. and Kim, U. (1993). The way ahead: From indigenous psychologies to a universal psychology. In Kim, U. and Berry, J. W. (eds.), Indigenous psychologies, pp. 277–280. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Pandey, J., Dasen, P. R., Saraswathi, T. S., Segall, M. H., and Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., (eds.). (1997). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, 2nd edn., vols. 1–3. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., and Dasen, P. R. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., Koppel, J. M. H., Sénéchal, C., Annis, R. C., Bahuchet, S., Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Witkin, H. A. (1986). On the edge of the forest: Cultural adaptation and cognitive development in Central Africa. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Biasoli-Alves, Z. M. M. (1997). Famílias brasileiras do século XX: Os valores e as práticas de educação da criança [Brazilian families in the twentieth century: Child rearing values and practices]. Temas em Psicologia, 3: 33–49.Google Scholar
Blair, S. L., Blair, M., and Madamba, A. (1999). Racial/ethnic differences in High school students' academic performance: Understanding the interleave of social class and ethnicity in the family context. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 30: 539–555.Google Scholar
Blood, R. O. and Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives. The dynamics of married living. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Blos, P. (1979). The adolescent passage. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Blumberg, R. L. and Winch, R. F. (1972). Societal complexity and familial complexity: Evidence for the curvilinear hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology, 77: 898–920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boesch, C. (1991). Teaching among wild chimpanzees. Animal Behavior, 41: 530–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogardus, E. S. (1925). Measuring social distance. Journal of Applied Sociology, 9: 299–308.Google Scholar
Bogenschneider, K. (2000). Has family policy come of age? A decade review of the state of US family policy in the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62: 1136–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohannan, P. (1963). Social anthropology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Boiko, V. V. (1980). Molodetnaya semya [Families with small numbers of children]. Moscow: Statistic.Google Scholar
Bond, R. and Smith, P. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119: 111–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonke, J. (2004a). Modern man: The slow move towards equality. European Observatory on the Social Situation, Demography, and the Family. SDF Puzzle. Retrieved from http://www.oif.ac.at/sdf/sdf_05_2004.html.
Bonke, J. (2004b). The modern husband/father and wife/mother. How do they spend their time? European Observatory on the Social Situation, Demography, and the Family. SDF Puzzle. Retrieved from http://www.oif.ac.at/sdf/sdf_05_2004.html.
Borisenko, B. K. (1998). Vesylny zvuchai ta obriady na Ukraini [Marriage customs in Ukraine]. Kiev: Naukova dumka.Google Scholar
Bott, E. (1971). Family and social networks: Roles, norms, and external relationships in ordinary urban families. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Boutafnoushat, M. (1984). The Algerian family [Arabic text]. Algiers: University Publications National Office.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. (1983). Why is culture adaptive?Quarterly Review of Biology, 58: 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brannon, L. (2002). Gender: Psychological perspectives, 3rd edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Bravo, G. (1990). Imágenes de la vida cotidiana chilena, 1850–1930. Consideraciones sobre el matrimonio y la familia [Images of the Chilean daily life, 1850–1930. Considerations about marriage and family]. In Pinto, S. (ed.), Familia, matrimonio y mestizaje en Chile colonial, pp. 85–102. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.Google Scholar
Bretschneider, P. (1995). Polygyny: A cross-cultural study. Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Brewster, K. L. and Padavic, I. (2000). Change in gender-ideology, 1977–1996: The contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62: 477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bril, B. (1995). Les apports de la psychologie culturelle comparative à la compréhenson du développement de l'enfant [The relevance of comparative cultural psychology to the comprehension of child development]. In Lautrey, J. (ed.), Universel et différentiel en psychologie, pp. 327–349. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Brink, G. (1996). De grote overgang. Een lokaal onderzoek naar de modernisering van het bestaan. Woensel, 1670–1920 [The big transition. A local inquiry into the modernization of every day life. Woensel, 1670–1920]. Nijmegen: SUN.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. and Weiss, H. B. (1983). Beyond policies without people: An ecological perspective on child and family policy. In Zigler, E., Kagan, S. L., and Klugman, E. (eds.), Children, families and government: Perspectives on American social policy, pp. 393–414. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brune, N., Bulgutch, M., Fielding, J., Faulknor, A., Hawes, R., and O'Neill, M. (2003). Defining Canada: History, identity, and culture. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
Brunner, J. J. (1990). Tradicionalismo y modernidad en la cultura latinoamericana [Traditionalism and modernity in Latin American culture]. Documentos de Trabajo, Serie Educación y Cultura, No. 4. Santiago: FLACSO.
Buah, F. K. (1960). Modern history since 1750. Stella Marris College London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bulcroft, R. A. and Bulcroft, K. A. (1993). Race differences in attitudinal and motivational factors in the decision to marry. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55: 338–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, E. and Milardo, R. M. (1995). Manital independence and social networks. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12: 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, E. W. (1926). The family as a unity of interacting personalities. Family, 7: 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, M. L. (1996). Intergenerational patterns of providing care in African-American families with teenage childbearers: Emergent patterns in an ethnographic study. In Bengtson, V. L., Schaie, K. W., and , L. M.Burton, (eds.), Adult intergenerational relations: Effects of social change, pp. 79–96. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Burton, M. L. and Jarrett, R. L. (2000). In the mix, yet on the margins: The place of families in urban neighborhood and child development research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62: 1114–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, M. L., Moore, C. C., Whiting, J. W. M., and Romney, A. K. (1996). Regions based on social structure. Current Anthropology, 37: 87–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussemaker, J. (1997). Overheid, gezin en sekse: Naar een nieuwe consensus [Government, family and gender: Towards a new consensus]. Jaarboek Gezinsbeleid. The Hague: Nederlandse Gezinsraad.Google Scholar
Cadolle, S. (2000). La décomposition de la famille [The disintegration of the family]. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Cândido, A. (1972). The Brazilian family. In Smith, T. L. and Marchant, A. (eds.), Brasil: Portrait of half a continent, pp. 291–312. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Carlos, M. L. and Sellers, L. (1972). Family, kinship structure, and modernization in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 7: 95–124.Google Scholar
Carter, B. and McGoldrick, M. (1999). The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Carvalho, M. C. B. (2000). O lugar da família na política social [The family within the social policy]. In Carvalho, M. C. B. (ed.), A família contemporânea em debate, pp. 13–21. São Paulo, Brazil: EDUC/Cortez.Google Scholar
Cassia, P. S. and Bada, C. (1992). The making of the modern Greek family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cavieres, E. (1990). Aspectos materiales y sentimentales de la familia tradicional colonial [Material and affective issues of the colonial traditional family]. In Pinto, S. (ed.), Familia, matrimonio y mestizaje en Chile colonial, pp. 51–67. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.Google Scholar
Cavieres, E. (1997). Transgresiones al matrimonio en Chile tradicional: Las faltas a la ley y a la fe [Transgressions to marriage in traditional Chile: Faults to the law and to the faith]. In Gonzalbo, P. (ed.), Género, familia y mentalidades en América Latina, pp. 39–60. San Juan: Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
Census of Canada (2001, 1996, 1991, 1986). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Ministerio de la Presidencia, Reino de España (1999). Los jóvenes de hoy [Today's youth]. Madrid: CIS.
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Ministerio de la Presidencia, Reino de España (2002a, May–August). Estudio no. 2443–Actitudes y creencias religiosas. Boletín Datos de Opinión no. 29 [Study no. 2443–Religious beliefs and attitudes. Opinion Data Bulletin no. 29]. Madrid: CIS. Retrieved from http://www.cis.es.
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Ministerio de la Presidencia, Reino de España (2002b, December). Estudio no. 2474 – Barómetro de opinión de diciembre. Expectativas 2003 [Study no. 2474 – December opinion barometer. 2003 Expectatives]. Madrid: CIS. Retrieved from http://www.cis.ess.
Cha, J. H. (1994). Changes in value, belief, attitude and behavior of the Koreans over the past 100 years. Korean Journal of Psychology: Social, 8: 40–58.Google Scholar
Chadwick, B. A. and Heaton, T. B. (1999). Statistical handbook on the American family. Phoenix, AZ: Orynx Press.Google Scholar
Cheal, D. (1993). Unity and the difference in postmodern families. Journal of Family Issues, 14: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chirkov, V., Kim, Y., Ryan, R., and Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 97–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chou, K.-L. (2000). Emotional autonomy and depression among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 161: 161–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christakopoulou, S. and Dawson, J. (2000). Community well-being in West Humberstone. Chester: Jon Dawson and Associates.Google Scholar
Chun, K., Balls-Organista, P., and Marin, G. (2003). Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement and applied research. Washington: APA Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mawhaw, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cohler, B. and Geyer, S. (1982). Psychological autonomy and interdependence within the family. In Walsh, F. (ed.), Normal family processes, pp. 196–227. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Cole, D. P. (1973). The enmeshment of nomads in Saudi Arabian society: The case of Murrah. In Nelson, C. (ed.), The desert and the sown: Nomads in wider society, pp. 113–128. Research Series, N21. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Collier, S. (1985). Chile from independence to the war of the Pacific. In Bethell, L. (ed.), The Cambridge history of Latin America, vol. 3, pp. 583–613. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, J. and Yanagisako, S. I. (1987). Gender and kinship: Essays toward a unified analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, Naciones Unidas (2000). Las mujeres chilenas en los noventa: Hablan las cifras [Chilean women in the nineties: Data's evidences]. Santiago: CEPAL/SERNAM.
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, Naciones Unidas (2001). Social panorama of Latin America 2000–2001. Retrieved from http://www.eclac.cl.
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, Naciones Unidas (2002). Anuario estadístico de América Latina y el Caribe 2001 [2001 Statistical yearbook of Latin America and the Caribbean]. Retrieved from http://www.eclac.cl.
Comision Nacional de la Familia, Republica de Chile (1993). Informe de la Comisión Nacional de la Familia [Family National Commission Report]. Santiago: Servicio Nacional de la Mujer.
Contreras, J. (1991). Los grupos domésticos: Estrategias de producción y de reproducción [Domestic groups: strategies of production and reproduction]. In Prat, J., Martínez, U., Contreras, J. and Moreno, I. (eds.), Antropología de los pueblos de España, pp. 343–380. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
Coontz, S. (2000). Historical perspectives on family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62: 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, D. (1971). The death of the family. Norwich: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Cowan, P. A. (1993). The sky is falling, but Popenoe's analysis won't help us do anything about it. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55: 548–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cribier, F. (1981). Changing retirement patterns: The experience of a cohort of Parisian salaried workers. Ageing and Society, 1: 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, P. and Santiago, P. (1998). Juventud y entorno familiar [Youth and family environment]. Madrid: Instituto de la Juventud.Google Scholar
Curtis, G. E. (1992). Bulgaria: A country study. Sofia, Bulgaria: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. Retrieved from http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/bgtoc.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuyvers, P. (2000). You can't have it all – at least at the same time: Segmentation in the modern life course as a threat to intergenerational communication and solidarity. In Trnka, S. (ed.). Family issues between gender and generations, pp. 30–43. Luxembourg: European Commission: Employment and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
Cuyvers, P. and Latten, J. (1999). Alleen of samen? Alleen en samen! [Single or together? Single and together!]. The Hague: CBS.
D'Cruz, P. and Bharat, S. (2001). Beyond joint and nuclear: The Indian family revisited. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32: 167–194.Google Scholar
Daguet, F. (1996). Mariage, divorce et union libre [Marriage, divorce and partners]. INSEE Première, 482: 1–4.Google Scholar
Dasen, P. R. (1975). Concrete operational development in three cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6: 156–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasen, P. R. (1993). L'ethnocentrisme de la psychologie [The ethnocentrism of psychology]. In Rey, M. (ed.), Psychologie clinique et interrogations culturelles, pp. 155–174. Paris: L'Hartmattan.Google Scholar
Dasen, P. R., Berry, J. W., and Witkin, H. A. (1979). The use of developmental theories cross-culturally. In Eckensberger, L., Lonner, W., and Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), Cross-cultural contributions to psychology, pp. 69–82. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Raad, B. (1994). An expedition in search of a fifth universal factor: Key issues in the lexical approach. European Journal of Personality, 8: 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekovic, M. Pels, T., and Model, S. (in press). Unity and diversity in child rearing: Family life in a multicultural society.
Delaney, C. (1991). The seed and the soil: Gender and cosmology in Turkish village society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dench, G. (1996). Transforming men. London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Derlega, V. J., Cukur, C. S., Kuang, J. C., and Foryth, D. R. (2002). Interdependent construal of self and the endorsement of conflict resolution strategies in interpersonal, intergroup and international disputesJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33: 610–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dessen, M. A. and Biasoli-Alves, Z. M. M. (2001). O estudo da família como base para a promoção da tolerância [Family studies as a base of promoting the tolerance]. In Biasoli-Alves, Z. M. M. and Fischmann, R. (eds.), Crianças e adolescentes: Construindo uma cultura da tolerância, pp. 183–193. São Paulo: EDUSP.Google Scholar
Dessen, M. A. and Braz, M. P. (2000). Rede social de apoio durante transições familiares decorrentes de nascimento de filhos [Social support network during family transitions to parenthood]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 16: 221–231.Google Scholar
Díaz-Guerrero, R. (1994). La psicología del Mexicano [The psychology of the Mexican]. Mexico: Editorial Trillas.Google Scholar
Doi, T. (1973). The anatomy of dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha International Press.Google Scholar
Donoso, J. (1989). Casa de campo [A house in the country]. Santiago: Editorial Antártica.Google Scholar
Droogers, A. (1988). Brazilian minimal religiosity. In Banck, G. and Koonings, K. (eds.), Social change in contemporary Brazil, pp. 165–175. Amsterdam: CEDLA.Google Scholar
Drouzhynin, V. (1996). Psyhologia semyee [Psychology of the family]. Moscow: KSP.Google Scholar
Duben, A. (1982). The significance of family and kinship in urban Turkey. In Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Sex roles, family and community in Turkey, pp. 73–99. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, G. J. and Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). Family poverty, welfare reform, and child development. Child Development, 71: 188–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durkheim, E. (1888). Introduction a la sociologie de la famille [Introduction to the sociology of the family]. Annales de la Faculté des Lettres de Bordeaux, 10.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. ([1892] 1921). La famille conjugale [The conjugal family]. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'Etranger, 90: 1–14.Google Scholar
Edgell, S. (1980). Middle-class couples. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ekstrand, L. H. and Ekstrand, G. (1987). Children's perceptions of norms and sanctions in two cultures. In Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology, pp. 171–180. Berwyn, PA: Swets North America.Google Scholar
Eldering, L. and Leseman, P. P. M. (eds.). (1999). Effective early education: Cross-cultural perspectives. New York: Falmer.Google Scholar
Elovson, A. C. and Fleming, J. S. (1988). “Rationale for multidimentional self-esteem scale scoring and weighting.” Unpublished manuscript, California State University.
Elzo, J. and Orizo, F. (1999). Jóvenes españoles [Spanish youth]. Madrid: Fundación Santamaria.Google Scholar
Ember, C. R. and Ember, M. (2002). Cultural anthropology, 10th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Encyclopédie Hachette Multimedia 99 (1999). (2 cd-roms). Paris: Hachette.
Encyclopédie Microsoft Encarta en ligne (2005). France (population et société). Retrieved from http://fr.encarta.msn.com.
Engels, F. ([1884] 1942). The origin of the family, private property and the state. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Enriquez, V. (ed.) (1990). Indigenous psychologies. Quezon City: Psychology Research and Training House.Google Scholar
Erkut, S. (1982). Dualism in values toward education of Turkish women. In Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Sex roles, family and community in Turkey, pp. 121–132. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Eurostat (1995). European community household panel. Luxembourg: European Communities.
Eurostat (1996). Demographic statistics. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities.
Eurostat (2001). The social situation in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General for Employment and Social Affairs.
Eurostat (2002a). Eurostat yearbook, 2002. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities.
Eurostat (2002b). First results of the demographic data collection for 2001 in Europe. Statistics in focus: Population and social conditions – Theme 3: Population and living conditions (17/2002). Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://www.europa. eu.int/comm/eurostat.
Fallers, L. A., and Fallers, M. C. (1976). Sex roles in Edremit. In Peristiany, J. G. (ed.), Mediterranean family structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, B. (1999). Family: The making of an idea, and institution, and a controversy in American culture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Fawcett, J. T. (1983). Perceptions of the value of children. In Bulatao, R., Lee, R. D., Hollerbach, P. E., and Bongaarts, J. (eds.), Determinants of fertility in the developing countries, vol. 1, pp. 347–369. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, (1975). The history of the relationship between environment and culture in ethnological thought. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 110: 67–81.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, S. S. and Rosenthal, D. A. (1991). Age expectations of behavioural autonomy in Hong Kong, Australian and American youth: The influence of family variables and adolescents' values. International Journal of Psychology, 26: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feres, J. (2001). La pobreza en Chile en el año 2000 [Poverty in Chile in 2000]. CEPAL, Serie estudios estadísticos y prospectivos, No. 14. Santiago: EPAL/MIDEPLAN.
Fernald, A. (1992). Meaningful melodies in mothers' speech to infants. In Papoušek, H., Jurgens, U., and Papoušek, M. (eds.), Nonverbal vocal communication: Comparative and developmental approaches, pp. 263–281. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferri, E. and Smith, K. (1996). Parenting in the 1990s. Report for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York, England.Google Scholar
Fields, J. (2003). Children's living arrangements and characteristics: March 2002. Current Population Reports, pp. 20–547. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
Finch, J. (1997). Individuality and adaptability in English kinship. In Gullestad, M. and Segalen, M. (eds.), Family and kinship in Europe, pp. 129–145. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Finch, J. and Mason, J. (1993). Negotiating family responsibilities. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisek, G. O. (1982). Psychopathology and the Turkish family: A family systems theory analysis. In Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Sex roles, family and community in Turkey, pp. 295–321. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fisek, G. O. (1993). Life in Turkey. In Adler, L. L. (ed.), International handbook of gender roles, pp. 438–451. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Fisek, G. O. (1995). Gender hierarchy: Is it a useful concept in describing family structure? In Lawick, J. and Sanders, M. (eds.), Family, gender and beyond, pp. 63–72. Heemstede, The Netherlands: LS Books.Google Scholar
Fisek, G. O. and Sunar, D. (2003). Contemporary Turkish families. In Roopnarine, J. and Gielen, U. (eds.), Families in Global Perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Flaquer, Ll. (2000). Family policy and welfare state in southern Europe. Barcelona: Institut de Ciènces Polítiques i Socials (Working Paper 185/00).Google Scholar
Flaquer, Ll. and Soler, J. (1990). Permananecia y cambio en la familia española [Continuity and change in the Spanish family] (Colección Estudios y Encuestas, no 18). Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
Forde, D. (1934). Habitat, economy and society. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Fortes, M. (1978). An anthropologist's apprenticeship. Annual Review of Anthropology, 7: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourastié, J. (1983). Image de la population active en 1975 selon le niveau de qualification [Overview of the active working population according to level of qualification]. Population, 3: 489–498.
Franza, M. (1999). Les mineurs délinquants multirécidivistes: Une nouvelle forme de prise en charge; les Centres Éducatifs Renforcés [Recidivist delinquent minors: A new type of control; Special Educational Centers]. Les Cahiers de l'Actif, 282–283: 101–114.Google Scholar
Freedman, M. (1958). Lineage organization in southeastern China: London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Friedl, E. (1962). Vassilika: A village in modern Greece. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Friedl, E. (1967). The position of women: Appearance and reality. Anthropological Quarterly, 40: 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, V. R., Hinkle, D. E., and Hanna, M. A. (1986). A three-generational study of the development of individual dependence and family interdependence. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 112: 153–171.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, F. F. Jr. (1966). Industrialization and the American family: A look backward. American Sociological Review, 31: 326–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furstenberg, F. F. and Nord, C. W. (1985). Parenting apart: Patterns of childrearing after marital disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47: 893–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, J. K. (1996). The good society: The humane agenda. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Galland, O. (1991). Sociologie de la jeunesse: L'entrée dans la vie. [Sociology of youth: Entrance into life] Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Gari, A. and Kalantzi-Azizi, , A. (1998). The influence of traditional values of education on Greek students' real and ideal self-concepts. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geertz, H. (1961). The Javanese family. A study of kinship and socialization. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press of Glencoe, Inc.Google Scholar
Georgas, J. (1986). Oikogeneiakes axies foititon [Family values of students]. Greek Social Science Review, 61: 3–29.Google Scholar
Georgas, J. (1988). An ecological and social cross-cultural model: The case of Greece. In Berry, J. W., Irvine, S. H., and Hunt, E. B. (eds.), Indigenous cognition: Functioning in cultural context, pp. 105–123. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J. (1989). Changing family values in Greece: From collectivist to individualist. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20: 80–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J. (1991). Intrafamily acculturation of values in Greece. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22: 445–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J. (1993). An ecological-social model for indigenous psychology: The example of Greece. In Kim, U. and Berry, J. W. (eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Theory, method and experience in cultural context, pp. 56–78. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Georgas, J. (1999). Family as a context variable in cross-cultural psychology. In Adamopoulos, J. and Kashima, Y. (eds.), Social psychology and cultural context, pp. 163–175. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Georgas, J. (2000). E psychodynamiki tis oikogeneias stin Ellada: Omoiotites kai diafores me alles hores [The psychodynamics of the family in Greece: Similarities and differences with other countries]. In Kalantzi-Azizi, A. and Besevegis, E. (eds.), Themata epimorphosis evaisthetopoisis stelehon psychikis hygeias paidion kai efevon, pp. 231–251. Athens: Hellenika Grammata.Google Scholar
Georgas, J., Bafiti, T., Papademou, L., and Mylonas, K. (2004a). Families in Greece. In Roopnarine, J. L. and Gielen, U. P. (eds.), Families in global perspective, pp. 207–224. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Georgas, J. and Berry, J. W. (1995). An ecocultural taxonomy for cross-cultural psychology. Cross-Cultural Research, 29: 121–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J., Christakopoulou, S., Poortinga, Y., Goodwin, R., Angleitner, A., and Charalambous, N. (1997). The relationship of family bonds to family structure and function across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28: 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J., Gari, A., and Mylonas, K. (2004b). Relationships with kin in the Greek family [in Greek]. In Mousourou, L. and Strategaki, M. (eds.), The issue of family policy: Theoretical perspectives and empirical investigations, pp. 189–225. Athens: Gutenberg.
Georgas, J., Mylonas, K., Bafiti, T., Christakopoulou, S., Poortinga, Y. H., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Orung, S., Sunar, D., Kwak, K., Ataca, B., Berry, J. W., Charalambous, N., Goodwin, R., Wang, W.-Z., Angleitner, A., Stepanikova, I., Pick, S., Givaudan, M., Zhuravliova-Gionis, I., Konantambigi, R., Gelfand, M. J., Velislava, M., McBride-Chang, M., and Kodiç, Y. (2001). Functional relationships in the nuclear and extended family: A 16 culture study. International Journal of Psychology, 36: 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J., Vijver, F. J. R., and Berry, J. W. (2004c). The Ecocultural Framework, ecosocial indicators and psychological variables in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35: 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergen, H. (1991). The saturated family. Networker, September/October.
Gergen, M. M. and Gergen, K. J. (2000). Qualitative inquiry: Tensions and transformations. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn., pp. 1025–1046. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ghana Statistical Service (1994). Demographic and health survey. Accra, Ghana: DHS/Macro International Inc.
Ghana Statistical Service (1998). Demographic and health survey. Accra, Ghana: DHS/Macro International Inc.
Ghana Statistical Service (2000). 2000 Population Census of Ghana. Accra, Ghana: DHS/Macro International Inc.
Ghuman, P. A. S. (1994). Coping with two cultures: A study of British Asian and Indo-Canadian adolescents. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ghraib, S. A. (1991). Characteristics of agricultural societies in the Arab Gulf states [Arabic text]. Riyadh: The Arabic Center for Security Studies and Training.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gilmore, D. D. (1987). Honor and shame and the unity of the Mediterranean. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Glenn, N. (1993). A plea for objective assessment of the notion of family decline. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55: 542–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalbo, P. (1999). Introducción [Introduction]. In Gonzalbo, P. (ed.), Familia y educación en Iberoamérica, [Family and education in Iberoamerica] pp. 9–20. México: Centro de Estudios Históricos, El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Goode, W. J. (1963). World revolution and family patterns. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goode, W. J. (1964). The family, 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Goodenough, W. H. (1970). Description and comparison in cultural anthropology. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R., Adatia, K., Sinhal, H., Cramer, D., and Ellis, D. (1997). Social support and marital well-being in an Asian community. York, UK: York Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. and Tang, C. S. K. (1996). Chinese personal relationships. In Bond, M. H. (ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology, pp. 294–308. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J. (1983). The oriental, the ancient, and the primitive: Systems of marriage and the family in the pre-industrial societies of Eurasia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gore, M. S. (1968). Urbanization and family change. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.Google Scholar
Gottfried, A. D., Gottfried, A. W., Bathurst, K., and Killian, C. (1999). Maternal and dual-earner employment. In Lamb, M. E. (ed.), Parenting and child development in “nontraditional” families, pp. 15–38. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Government of Botswana and United Nations Development Report (1997). Botswana Human Development Report: Challenges for sustainable human development. Gaborone, Botswana: UNDP.
Government of Georgia and United Nations Development Report (1996). Human development report Georgia 1996. Tbilisi, Georgia: UNDP.
Government of Pakistan (2001, 2002). Economic survey, statistical supplement 2001–2002. Islamabad, Pakistan: Ministry of Finance.
Grotevant, H. D. and Cooper, C. R. (1986). Individuation in family relationships. Human Development, 29: 82–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusfield, J. R. (1967). Tradition and modernity: Misplaced polarities in the study of social change. American Journal of Sociology, 73: 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjiiski, I. (1995). Portret na balgarina [Portrait of the Bulgarian]. Sofia, Bulgaria: BAN.Google Scholar
Hagestad, G. (1986). The family: Women and grandparents as kinkeepers. In Pifer, A. and Bronte, L. (eds.), Our aging society, pp. 141–160. New York: Norton.Google ScholarPubMed
Hammel, E. A. (1972). The zadruga as process. In Laslett, P. and Wall, R. (eds.), Household and family in past time, pp. 335–374. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkness, J. A., Vijver, F. J. R., and Mohler, P. Ph. (2003). Cross-cultural survey methods. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Harrison, L. E. (2000). Why culture matters. In Harrison, L. E. and Huntington, S. P. (eds.), Culture matters: How values shape human progress, pp. xvii–xxxiv. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Haub, C. and Rogers, M. (2002). Kids count. International data sheet. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
Heise, J. (1979). 150 años de evolución institucional [150 years of institutional evolution]. Santiago: Editorial Andrés Bello.Google Scholar
Hemert, D. A., Vijver, F. J. R., Poortinga, Y. H., and Georgas, J. (2002). Structural and functional equivalence of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire within and between countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 33: 1229–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, S. and Hendrick, C. (2001). Liking, loving and relating. Pacific Groove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hentschel, U., Sumbadze, N., and Schoon, I. (2001). Looking at families from a cross-cultural perspective. In Hentschel, U. and Burlatchuk, L. (eds.), Focus Eastern Europe: Psychological and social determinants of behaviour in the transition countries, pp.155–172. Innsbruck: StudienVerlag.Google Scholar
Herbst, P. G. (1952). The measurement of family relationships. Human Relations, 5: 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herk, H. V. and Poortinga, Y. H. (2004). Evidence of method bias in data from six EU Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35: 346–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, L. W. (1987). The value of children to parents and childrearing parents. In Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology, pp. 159–170. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swetz and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Herk, H., Poortinga, Y. H., and Verhallen, T. M. M. (2004). Response styles in rating scales. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35: 346–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, L. W. (1988). Cross-cultural differences in childrearing goals. New Directions for Child Development, 40: 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. ([1980] 2001). Culture's consequences, Comparing values, behaviors institution, and Organization across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Holland, P. W. and Wainer, H. (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hollos, M. and Leis, P. E. (1989). Adolescents in a changing world. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Hortacsu, N. (1989). Targets of communication during adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 12: 253–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hortacsu, N., Gencoz, T., and Oral, A. (1995). Perceived functions of family and friends during childhood, adolescence, and youth: Developmental theories of two Turkish groups. International Journal of Psychology, 30: 591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hortulanus, W. (1983). De ontwikkeling van de welvaartsstaat. In Idenburg, P. (ed.), De nadagen van de verzorgingsstaat [The development of the welfare state]. Amsterdam: Meulenhof.Google Scholar
Houchard, B. (2000). La famille: Une idée neuve en Europe. Paris: Fondation Robert Schuman.Google Scholar
Howard, G. E. (1904). A history of matrimonial institutions. Chicago, IL. (repr. New York, 1964).Google Scholar
Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). Psychosocial homeostasis and jen: Conceptual tools for advancing psychological anthropology. American Anthropologist, 73: 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. A. (ed.). (1994). Chile: A country study. Washington, DC: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. Retrieved from http://www.memory.loc.gov/frd/cs/cltoc.html.Google Scholar
Hundey, I., Magarrey, M., Evans, R., and O'Sullivan, B. (2003). Canadian history: Patterns and transformations. Toronto: Irwin Publishing.Google Scholar
Huntington, E. (1945). Mainsprings of civilization. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hüwelmeier, G. (1997). Kirmesgesellschaften und Männergesangvereine [Amusement societies and mens' chores]. Zeitschrift für Sozialisationsforschung und Erziehungssoziologie, 17: 30–41.Google Scholar
Iachkova, M. (1997). Semeistvoto I podgotovkata za nego [Family and preparation for it]. Sofia, Bulgaria: ASSA-M.Google Scholar
Iglesias de Ussel, J. (1990). La familia y el cambio político en España [The family and political change in Spain]. Revista de Estudios Politicos, 67: 235–259.Google Scholar
Iglesias de Ussel, J. (1995). Trabajo y familia en España [Work and family in Spain]. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 11: 171–198.Google Scholar
Imamoglu, E. O. (1987). An interdependence model of human development. In Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology, pp. 138–145. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swetz and Zeitlinger.
Imamoglu, O. (1991). “Changing intra-family roles in a changing world.” Paper presented at the Seminar on the Individual, the Family and the Society in a Changing World, Istanbul, Turkey.
Imamoglu, O. (1994). A model of gender relations in the Turkish family. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Admininstrative Studies, 8: 165–176.Google Scholar
Indonesia Human Development Report (2001). Towards a new consensus: Democracy and human development in Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: BPS, BAPPENAS, UNDP.
Information Services Department of Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China (2002a). Hong Kong annual report 2001. Hong Kong: HKSAR Government.
Information Services Department of Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China (2002b). Hong Kong 2001 population census summary results. Hong Kong: HKSAR Government.
Inglehart, R. (1991). Changing human goals and values: A proposal for a study of global change. In Pawlik, K. (ed.), Perception and assessment of global environmental conditions and change. Barcelona, Spain: International Social Sciences Council.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Changing values and political styles in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. and Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65: 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingoldsby, B. (1995). Family origin and universality In Ingoldsby, B. and Smith, S. (eds.), Families in multicultural perspective, pp. 83–96. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ingoldsby, B. and Smith, S. (eds.). (1995). Families in multicultural perspective. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Inkeles, A. (1998). One world emerging?: Convergence and divergence in industrial societies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Inoue, T. (1977). “Sekentei” no kozo: Shakaishinrishi heno kokoromi [Structure of “sekentei”: An attempt at the socio-psychological history]. Tokyo: NHK Books.Google Scholar
Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques, République de France (1999). Recensement de la population. Paris: INSEE.
Instituto de la Juventud, Reino de España (2000). Informe juventud en España [Report on youth in Spain]. Madrid: INJUVE.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Reino de España (2002). Cifras INE. Boletín informativo del Instituto Nacional de Estadística, 7/2002 [Figures INE. Informative bulletin of the National Institute of Statistics, 7/2002]. Madrid: INE. Retrieved from http://www.ine.es.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Reino de España (2003). Cifras INE. Boletin Informativo del Instituto Nacional de Estadística, 2/2003 [Figures INE. Informative Bulletin of the National Institute of Statistics, 2/2003]. Madrid: INE. Retrieved from http://www.ine.es.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Republica de Chile (1999). Estadísticas de Chile en el siglo XX [Chile's statistical data during the 20th century]. Santiago: INE. Retrieved from http://www.ine.cl.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Republica de Chile (2003). Censo 2002: Síntesis de resultados [2002 census: A resume]. Santiago: INE. Retrieved from http://www.ine.cl.
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Geografia e Informática, Estados Unidos Mexicanos (2001). XII censo general de población y vivienda, 2000. Tabulados Básicos. Aguascalientes, Ags., Mexico: INEGI.
Jahoda, G. (1995). The ancestry of a model. Culture and Psychology, 1: 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, H. A. M. (1987). The development of communal living in the Netherlands. In Shangar-Handelman, L. and Palomba, R. (eds.), Alternative patterns of family life in modern societies. Rome: Collana Monografie.Google Scholar
Jayakody, R., Chatters, L. M., and Taylor, R. J. (1993). Family support to single and married African American mothers: The provision of financial, emotional and child care assistance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55: 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. L. (2000). Perspectives on American kinship in the later 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62: 623–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jose, P. E., Huntsinger, C. S., Huntsinger, P. R., and Liaw, F-R. (2000). Parental values and practices relevant to young children's social development in Taiwan and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31: 677–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabloukov, V. A. (1989). Problemy studencheskoi semiee [Problems of student's family]. Moscow: Znanie.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.). (1982a). Sex roles, family and community in Turkey. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1982b). The changing value of children in Turkey. Honolulu, Hawaii: East-West Center, Publ. No. 60-E.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1985). Culture of separateness–culture of relatedness. In Klopp, C. (ed.), 1984 Vision and reality. Papers in Comparative Studies, vol. 4, pp. 91–99. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1986). Status of women in Turkey: Cross-cultural perspectives. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 18: 485–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1990). Family and socialization in cross-cultural perspective: A model of change. In Berman, J. (ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives: Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1989, pp. 135–200. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1996a). Family and human development across cultures: A view from the other side. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1996b). The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis. European Psychologist, 1: 180–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (2002). A Model of Family Change in cultural context. In W. J. Lonner, D. L. Dinnel, S. A. Hayes, and D. N. Sattler (eds.), Online readings in psychology and culture (Unit 13, Chapter 1). Retrieved from http://www.wwu.edu/culture.
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. and Ataca, B. (2005) Value of children, family and say: A three decade portrait from Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(3): 317–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. and Sunar, D. (1992). Family and socialization in Turkey. In Roopnarine, J. P. and Carter, D. B. (eds.), Parent–child relations in diverse cultural settings: Socialization for instrumental competency, pp. 75–88. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Sunar, D., and Bekman, S. (1988). Comprehensive preschool educational project: Final report (Manuscript Report 209e). Ottawa: International Development Research Center.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, C., Sunar, D. and Bekman, S. (2001). Long-term effects of early intervention: Turkish low-income mothers and children. Applied Developmental Psychology, 22: 333–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, E. (1990). The myth of family decline: Understanding families in a world of rapid social change. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Kandiyoti, D. (1974). Some social psychological dimensions of social change in a Turkish village. British Journal of Sociology, 15: 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandiyoti, D. (1977). Sex roles and social change: A comparative appraisal of Turkish women. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 3: 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandiyoti, D. (1982). Urban change and women's roles in Turkey: An overview and evaluation. In Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (ed.), Sex roles, family and community in Turkey, pp. 101–120. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society, 2: 274–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapadia, K. M. (1956). Rural family patterns. Sociological Bulletin, 5: 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasto, H. S. (1982). Perkawinan dan perceraian pada masyarakat Jawa: Suatu studi kasus di desa Harjobinangun, Yogyakarta. [Marriage and divorce in a Javanese community: A case study in Harjobinangum village, Yogyakarta]Jakarta, Indonesia: Pusat Penelitian dan Studi Kependudukan, University of Gadjah Mada.Google Scholar
Kauffman, J.-C. (1993). Sociologie du couple [Sociology of the couple]. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Kazemi-Mortazavi, S. (1978). “Kulturspezifische Aspekte in der Beziehung zwischen Verhalten und raumlicher Umgebung” [Culture-specific aspects of the relationship between behavior and environment]. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Tübingen University, Germany.
Keller, H. (1997). Evolutionary approaches. In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., and Pandey, J. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 1 Theory and method, 2nd edn., pp. 215–255. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Keller, H. (2002). Development as the interface between biology and culture: A conceptualization of early ontogenetic experiences. In Keller, H., Poortinga, Y. H., and Schoelmerich, A. (eds.), Biology, culture and development: Integrating diverse perspectives, pp. 215–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, H., Zach, U., and Abels, M. (2005). The German family. Families in Germany. In Roopnarine, J. and Gielen, U. P. (eds.), Families in global perspective, pp. 242–258. Boston, MA: Allison and Bacon.Google Scholar
Keniston, K. (1985). The myth of family independence. In Henslin, J. M. (ed.), Marriage and family in a changing society, 2nd edn., pp. 27–33. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kermode, J. (1999). Sentiment and survival: Family and friends in late medieval English towns. Journal of Family History, 24: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khatri, A. A. (1970). Personality and mental health of Indians (Hindus) in the context of their changing family organization. In Anthony, E. J. and Koupernik, C. (eds.), The child in his family. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Khatri, A. A. (1975). The adaptive extended family in India today. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37: 633–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiechel, W. (1987, April 13). When the boss wants you to move. Fortune Magazine, pp. 125–128.Google Scholar
Kim, M.-H. (1996). Changing relationships between daughters-in-law and mothers-in-law in urban South Korea. Anthropological Quarterly, 4: 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, U. (1994). Individualism, collectivism, and child development: A Korean perspective. In Greenfield, P. M. and Cocking, R. R. (eds.), Socialization of minority children: Cultural continuities and discontinuities, pp. 227–257. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kim, U. (1995). Individualism and collectivism: Psychological, cultural and ecological analysis. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Kim, U. (2001). Culture, science and indigenous psychologies: An integrated analysis. In Matsumoto, D. (ed.), Handbook of culture and psychology, pp. 51–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, U. and Berry, J. W. (eds.). (1993). Indigenous psychologies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kim, U., Park, Y. S., Kim, M. U., Lee, K. W., and Yu, S. H. (2000). Intergenerational differences and life-satisfaction: Comparative analysis of adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 5: 119–145.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., Butzel, J. S., and Ryan, R. M. (1998, June). Interdependence and well-being: A function of culture and relatedness needs. Paper presented at The International Society for the Study of Personal Relationships, Saratoga Spring, NY.
King, A. Y. C. and Bond, M. H. (1985). The Confucian paradigm of man: A sociological view. In Tseng, W. S. and Wu, D. Y. H. (eds.), Chinese culture and mental health, pp. 29–45. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kiray, M. (1976). The new role of mothers: Changing intra-familial relationships in a small town in Turkey. In Peristiany, J. G. (ed.), Mediterranean family structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitayama, S. and Markus, H. R. (1994). Introduction to cultural psychology and emotion research. In Kitayama, S. and Markus, H. R. (eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence, pp. 1–22. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinger, A. (1990). Integration of population policy and socioeconomic policy. Paper presented at ECE First Informal Working Group Meeting on Integration of Population Policies and Socioeconomic Policies, Varna, Bulgaria.
Kluċkhohn, C. and Murray, H. A. (1950). Personality in nature, society, and culture. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Kochetov, A. I. (1987). Nachala semeinoi zhizni [Beginning of married life]. Minsk, Belarus: Polymia.Google Scholar
Kojuharov, I. (1992). National analysis of the situation of Bulgarian children and families. Sofia, Bulgaria: Bulgarian National Committee for UNICEF.Google Scholar
Kon, I. S. (1988). Rebenok i obschestvo [Child and society]. Moscow: Mir.
Kooy, G. (1992). De ontwikkeling van partnerschap en ouderschap in de modern-westerse wereld [Development of partnership and parenthood in the modern western world]. In Moerland, H. (ed.), De menselijke Maat. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Gouda Quint.Google Scholar
Korea National Statistics Office (2003). Annual statistics. Seoul: Government of Korea.
Kotzamanis, V. and Maratou-Alibrante, L. (1994). Oi demographikes exelixis sti metapolemiki Ellada [Greek demographics after World War II]. Athens: Livanis, Nea Synora.Google Scholar
Koutrelakos, J. (2004). Acculturation of Greek Americans: Change and continuity in cognitive schemas guiding intimate relationships. International Journal of Psychology, 39: 95–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kravets, O. M. (1966). Simeiny pobut i zvuchai ukrainskogo narodou [Family lifestyle and traditions of Ukrainian people]. Kiev, Ukraine: Naukova Dumka.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. (1909). Classificatory systems of relationship. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 39: 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A. (1939). Cultural and natural areas of native North America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kroger, J. (1998). Adolescence as a second separation–individuation process: Critical review of an object relations approach. In Skoe, E. E. A. and Lippe, A. L. (eds.), Personality development in adolescence: A cross-national and life span perspective. Adolescence and society, pp. 172–192. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kwak, K. (2003). Adolescents and their parents: A review of intergenerational family relations for immigrant and non-immigrant families. Human Development, 46: 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwak, K. and Berry, J. W. (2001). Generational differences in acculturation among Asian families in Canada: A comparison of Vietnamese, Korean, and East-Indian groups. International Journal of Psychology, 36: 152–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, R. D. (1969). The divided self. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Lambiri-Dimaki, I. (1972). Dowry in modern Greece: An institution at the crossroads between persistence and decline. In Safilios-Rothschild, C. (ed.), Toward a sociology of women, pp. 74–75. Lexington, MA: Xerox College Publishing.Google Scholar
Lappo, G. M. (1984). Stranee i narodee [Countries and peoples]. Moscow: Mysl.Google Scholar
Lasch, C. (1979). The culture of narcissism. New York: Warner.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. (1971). The world we have lost, 2nd edn. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. (1972). Introduction: The history of the family. In Laslett, P. and Wall, R. (eds.), Household and family in past time, pp. 1–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, S. (1981). Chinese familism in an urban-industrial setting: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43: 977–992.Google Scholar
Le Play, F. (1855). Les ouvriers européens [The European Workers]. Études sur les travaux, la vie domestique et la condition morale des populations ouvrières de l'Europe, précédées d'un exposé de la méthode d'observation. Paris: Imprimerie impériale.
Play, F. (1871). L'organisation de la famille [The organisation of the family]. Paris: Tegui.Google Scholar
Lebra, T. S. (1976). Japanese patterns of behavior. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Leburu-Sianga, F. and Molobe, E. (2000). ADEA prospective stocktaking capacity building study: A focus on human resource development for the Ministry of Education. Gaborone, Botswana: ADEA Publications.Google Scholar
LeGoff, J. (1985). L'imaginaire médiéval. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Leñero, O. L. (1982). El niño y la familia [The child and the family]. Ciudad de México: SCPEIN.Google Scholar
Lesthaeghe, R. (1980). On the social control of human reproduction. Population and Development Review, 6: 527–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesthaeghe, R. and Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change. Population and Development Review, 14(1): 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letamo, G. and Majelantle, R. G. (2001). Factors influencing low birth weight and prematurity in Botswana. Journal of Bioscience, 33: 391–403.Google ScholarPubMed
Lévi-Strauss, C. ([1949] 1969). Les structures élémentaires de la parenté. [The elementary structures of kinship]. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, C. (1969). The elementary structures of kinship. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
Levinson, D. and Malone, M. J. (1980). Toward explaining human culture. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.Google Scholar
Levitt, M. J., Weber, R. A., and Guacci, N. (1993). Convoys of social support: An intergenerational analysis. Psychology and Aging, 8: 323–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, M. (1949). The family revolution in modern China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. (2000). A man's place in the home: Fathers and families in the UK. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Liljestrom, R. (2002). The strongest bond on trial. In Liljestrom, and Ozdalga, (eds.), Autonomy and dependence in the family, pp. 59–79. Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute.Google Scholar
Lin, C-Y. C. and Fu, V. R. (1990). A comparison of child-rearing practices among Chinese, immigrant Chinese, and Caucasian-American parents. Child Development, 61: 429–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, R. (1936). The study of man. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Linton, R. (1945). The cultural background of personality. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Lomax, A. and Berkowitz, W. (1972). The evolutionary taxonomy of culture. Science, 177: 228–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovell-Troy, L. (1980). Clan structure and economic activity: The case of Greeks in small business enterprise. In Cummings, S. (ed.), Self-help in urban America, pp. 58–85. Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.Google Scholar
Bolles, Lynn A. (1996). Sister Jamaica: A study of women, work, and households in Kingston. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E. M. and Jacklin, C. N. (1975). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, A. (1978). The origins of English individualism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, A., (1986). Marriage and love in England: Modes of reproduction 1300–1840. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Magnis-Suseno, F. (1984). Etika Jawa. Sebuah Analisis Falsafi tentang Kebijaksanaan Hidup Jawa. [Javanese ethics. A philosophical analysis of Javanese living wisdom.] Jakarta, Indonesia: Penerbit PT Gramedia.Google Scholar
Main reasons for divorce [Arabic text]. (2000, December 30). Al-Youm. A daily newspaper, p. 583. Algiers, Algeria.
Makaveeva, L. (1991). Balgarskoto semistvo [The Bulgarian family]. Sofia, Bulgaria: Balgarska Akademia na Naukite, Etnografski Institut s Muzei.Google Scholar
Makgoba, M. W. (1997). The Makgoba affair: A reflection on transformation. Pretoria, South Africa: Vivla Publishers and Book Sellers.Google Scholar
Makgoba, M. W. and Seepe, S. (2004). Knowledge and identity: An African vision of higher education transformation. In Seepe, S. (ed.), Towards an African identity of higher education, pp. 13–58. Pretoria, South Africa: Vista University and Skotaville Media.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1927). Sex and repression in savage society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mandela, N. (1994, May 11). A time for healing the wounds. The Star.
Mansfield, P. and Collard, J. (1988). The beginning of the rest of your life?Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maratou-Alibrante, L. (1995). H oikogenia stin Ellada: Oikogeniaka protypa kai syzigikes praktikes [Family in Greece: Family norms and spouse functions]. Athens: National Social Sciences Center.Google Scholar
Maratou-Alibrante, L. (1999). Diageneakes sxeseis sti synchrone epoche [Intergenerational relationships in modern epoch]. Greek Review of Social Research, 4976: 98–99.Google Scholar
Marks, N. F. and McLanahan, S. S. (1993). Gender, family structure, and social support among parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55: 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. ([1867] 1936). Capital. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D. (1999). Culture and self: An empirical assessment of Markus and Kitayama's theory of independent and interdependent self-construals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2: 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbeki, T. (2002). Presidential speech at the graveyard of Sarah Bartman. Pretoria, South Africa: Government Press.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. E. and Terraciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88: 547–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlone, F., Park, A., and Smith, K. (1998). Families and kinship. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. J. (1995). The new Germany: Social, political and cultural challenges of unification. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
McLanahan, S. and Teitler, J. (1999). The consequences of father absence. In Lamb, M. E. (ed.), Parenting and child development in “nontraditional” families, pp. 83–102. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meeker, M. (1976). Meaning and society in the Near East: Examples from the Black Sea Turks and the Levantine Arabs (Parts I and II). International Journal of Middle East Studies, 7: 243–270 and 383–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendras, H. (1997). L'Europe des Européens: Sociologie de l'Europe occidentale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Menon, T., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C., and Hong, Y. (2000). Culture and the construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76: 701–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mermet, J. (1999). Francoscopie: Comment vivent les Français? [Francoscopie: How do the French live?] Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Metz, C. H. (1993). Algeria: A country study. Washington, DC: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress.Google Scholar
Milardo, R. M. (1997). Social networks and marital relationships. In Duck, S. (ed.), Handbook of personal relationships, pp. 505–522, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Millar, J. and Warman, A. (1996). Family obligations in Europe. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.Google Scholar
Miller, J. G. (1997). Theoretical issues in cultural psychology. In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., and Pandey, J. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 1. Theory and method, 2nd edn., pp. 85–128. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deportes, Reino de España (2000). Sistema educativo español [Spanish educational system]. Madrid: MECD. Retrieved from http://www.mecd.es.
Mishra, R. C., Sinha, D., and Berry, J. W. (1996a). Cognitive functioning of tribal groups in Bihar. In Grad, H., Blanco, A., and Georgas, J. (eds.), Key issues in cross-cultural psychology, pp. 89–101. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Mishra, R. C., Sinha, D. and Berry, J. W. (1996b). Ecology, acculturation and psychological adaptation: A study of Advasi in Bihar. Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mitteraurer, M. and Seider, R. (1982). The European family: Patriarchy to partnership from the middle ages to the present. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mivanyi, Y. J. (1988). “The extended family system and learning styles of Junior Secondary School (JSS) III Adamawa and Taraba States of Nigeria.” Preliminary investigation to a doctoral thesis, University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria.
Mivanyi, Y. J. (2002). National census on water rehabilitations and supplyKano State: A report.Nigeria.Google Scholar
Modood, T., Berthoud, R., Lakey, J., Nazroo, J., Smith, P., Virdee, S., and Beishon, S. (1997). Ethnic minorities in Britain: Diversity and disadvantage. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Mogey, J. (1991). Families: Intergenerational and generational connections–conceptual approaches to kinship and culture. Marriage and Family Review, 16: 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montecino, S. (1993). Madres y huachos. Alegorías del mestizaje chileno [Mothers and bastards. Allegories of Chilean half-caste]. Santiago: Editorial Cuarto Propio-Ediciones CEDEM.Google Scholar
Moore, C. A. (1974). Introduction: The humanistic Chinese mind. In Moore, C. A. (ed.), The Chinese mind: Essentials of Chinese philosophy and culture, pp. 1–10. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Moran, E. (1982). Human adaptability: An introduction to ecological anthropology. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Moran, E. (1990). The ecosystem approach in anthropology. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. H. (1870). Systems of consanguinity and affinity of the human family. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortazavi, S. (1996). Iranian school spaces [In Farsi]. Tehran: Iranian Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Mortazavi, S. (2000). Attitudes of feminine rural high-school pupils towards immigration [In Farsi]. Tehran: Pajuheschnameh University of Shahid Beheshti.Google Scholar
Mortazavi, S. and Karimi, E. (1992). Cultural dimensions of paternalistic behavior: A cross-cultural research in 5 countries. In Iwawaki, S., Kashima, Y. and Leung, K. (eds.), Innovations in cross-cultural psychology, pp. 147–151. Amsterdam: Swetz & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Mousourou, L. M. (1985). Oikogeneia kai paidi stin Athena [Family and child in Athens]. Athens: Estia.Google Scholar
Mthembu, T. (2004). Creating a niche in internationalization for (South) African higher education institutions. In Seepe, S. (ed.), Towards an African identity of higher education, pp. 77–82. Pretoria, South Africa: Vista University and Skotaville Media.Google Scholar
Muncie, J. and Sapsford, R. (1995). Issues in the study of “the family.” In Muncie, J., Wetherell, M., Dallos, R., and Cochrane, A. (eds.). Understanding the family, pp. 7–37. London: SageGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, M. and Reyes, E. (1997). Una mirada al interior de la familia [A glance inside the family]. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.Google Scholar
Munroe, R. L. and Munroe, R. H. (1997). A comparative anthropological perspective. In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., and Pandey, J. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 1. Theory and method, 2nd edn., pp. 171–213. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Muramoto, Y. (2003). An indirect self-enhancement in relationship among Japanese. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34: 552–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muramoto, Y. and Yamaguchi, S. (2003). “Jikohige” ga kietu toki: Naishudan no kankeisei ni oujita jiko to shudan no seikou no katarikata [When “self-effacement” disappears: Narratives of personal and ingroup successes depending on an ingroup relationship]. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 43: 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdock, G. P. (1949). Social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Murdock, P. M. (1957). World ethnographic sample. American Anthropologist, 59: 664–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdock, G. P. (1967): Ethnographic Atlas. Pittsburgh, PA: HRAF Press.Google Scholar
Murdock, G. P. (1969). Correlations of exploitative and settlement patterns. In Damas, D. (ed.), Contributions to anthropology: Ecological essays (Bulletin no. 230, Anthropological Series no. 86). Ottawa: National Museum of Canada.Google Scholar
Murdock, G. P. (1975). Outline of cultural materials. New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files.Google Scholar
Murray, M. (1994). The revolution deferred: The painful birth of post-apartheid South Africa. London: City Press.Google Scholar
Mylona, L. (1986). Cypriot woman. Nicosia, Cyprus.Google Scholar
Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Naroll, R., Michik, G. L., and Naroll, F. (1974). Hologeistic theory testing. In Jurgensen, J. G. (ed.), Comparative studies by Harold E. Driver and essays in his honor. New Haven, CT: HRAN.Google Scholar
Neder, G. (1998). Ajustando o foco das lentes: Um novo olhar sobre a organizaCão das famílias no Brasil [Adjusting the focal point: A new glance at the family organization in Brazil]. In Kaloustian, S. M. (ed.), Família brasileira: A base de tudo, pp. 26–46. São Paulo and Brasilia: Cortez and UNICEF.Google Scholar
Gezinsraad, Nederlandse (2001). Gezin: Beeld en werkelijkheid [Family: Image and reality]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Nederlandse Gezinsraad.Google Scholar
Needham, R. (1974). Remarks and inventions: Skeptical essays about kinship. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Nhlapo, T. (1992). Marriage and divorce in Swazi law and custom. Mbabane, Swaziland: Swazi Press.Google Scholar
Nimkoff, M. F. and Middleton, R. (1960). Types of family and types of economy. American Journal of Sociology, 66: 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nogueira, A. H. (2001). “Padrões culturais e normas para comportamentos de lideranca: Um estudo comparativo entre empregados de empresas de previdência privada do Brasil e dos EUA” [Cultural patterns and norms for leadership behaviors: A comparative study among employees of private social security agencies in Brazil and the US]. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Brasilia, Brazil.
Norval, A. L. (2001). “Deconstructing apartheid.” Unpublished paper, University of Essex, UK.
Nsamenang, B. (1992). Human development in cultural context. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Nukunya, G. K. (1969). Kinship and marriage among the Anlo Ewe-speaking people of Ghana (London School of Economics, Monographs on Social Anthropology, 37). London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Nukunya, G. K. (1992). Tradition and change in Ghana: An introduction to sociology. Accra, Ghana: Ghana Universities Press.Google Scholar
Nurhaena (1995). “Keterlibatan Ayah dalam Pengasuhan Bayi dan Anak Kecil.” [Father's involvement in rearing babies and toddlers]. Unpublished research report, Faculty of psychology, University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
Oboladze, U. (1990). Women's issue in writings of Ilia Chavchavadze. Tbilisi, Georgia: Tbilisi State University Publishing House.Google Scholar
Office Nationale des Statistiques, République Algérienne Démocratique et Populaire (2005). L'annuaire statistique de l'Algérie No 20: Résultats 1999–2001. Algiers: ONS.
Office of National Statistics, UK (2000). Social trends 2000. London: The Stationery Office.
Office of National Statistics, UK (2001). Britain 2001. London: The Stationery Office.
Office of National Statistics, UK (2002). UK 2002, Official yearbook of the UK. London: The Stationery Office.
Olson, D. H., McCubbin, H. I., Barnes, H. L., Muxen, M. J., Larsen, A. S., and Wilson, M. A. (1989). Families: What makes them work, updated edn. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Olson, E. A. (1982). Duofocal family structure and an alternative model of husband–wife relationship. In Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Sex roles, family and community in Turkey, pp. 33–72. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Omolara, P. A. (1995). “A study of the effects of parental separation on the academic performance and personality traits of children.” Unpublished paper, Department of Education (Technical), Kaduna Polytechnic, Kaduna, Nigeria.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Program for International Students Assessment (2004). Messages from PISA 2000. Retrieved from http://www.pisa.oecd.org.
Orlove, B. S. (1980). Ecological anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9: 235–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orrego-Luco, L. (1983). Casa grande [Great house]. Santiago: Editorial Andrés Bello.Google Scholar
Owen, D. W. (1996). The Other–Asians: The salad bowl. In Peach, C. (ed.), Ethnicity in the 1991 Census. London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Owens, R. (1971). Industrialization and the Indian joint family. Ethnology, 10: 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozgur, S. and Sunar, D. (1982). Social psychological patterns of homicide in Turkey: A comparison of male and female convicted murders. In Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Sex roles, family and community in Turkey, pp. 349–381. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Panayotopoulos, B. (1985). Dimension et composition de la famille péloponnélsienne aux environs de 1700: Quelques remarques [Dimensions and Composition of the Peloponnesian family around 1700: some comments]. In Piault, C. (ed.), Famillies et biens en Gréce et à Chypre, pp. 29–44. Paris: Editions L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Papademou, L. (1999). Koinonike kai psychologike analyse tis oikogeneias [Social and psychological analysis of the family]. Psychologia, 6: 165–173.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, T. (1998). Greek family policy from a comparative perspective. In Drew, E., Emerek, R., and Mahon, E. (eds.), Women, work and the family in Europe, pp. 47–57. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, A., Curtice, J., Thomson, K., Jarvis, L., and Bromley, C. (2001). British social attitudes: The 18th report. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Y. S. and Kim, U., (2004). Parent–child relationship in Korea: Indigenous psychological analysis of self-concept and family role. Seoul: Kyoyook Kwahaksa.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1943). The kinship system of the contemporary United States. American Anthropologist, 45: 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T. (1949). The social structure of the family. In Anshen, R. N. (ed.), The family: Its functions and destiny, pp. 33–58. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1965). The normal American family. In Farber, S. M. (ed.), Man and civilization: The family's search for survival, pp. 34–36. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Pasternak, B. E., Ember, C. R., and Ember, M. (1976). On the conditions favoring extended family households. Journal of Anthropological Research, 32: 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternak, B. E., Ember, C. R. and Ember, M. (1997). Sex, gender and kinship: A cross-cultural perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Pavliouk, S. P., Goryn, G. U., and Kyrchiv, R. F. (1997). Ukrainske narodoznavstvo [Ukrainian folklore]. Lviv, Ukraine: Fenix.Google Scholar
Pearson, V. M. and Stephan, W. G. (1998). Preferences for styles of negotiation: A comparison of Brasil and the US. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22: 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peletz, M. (1995). Kinship studies in late twentieth-century anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24: 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelto, P. (1968). The difference between “tight” and “loose” societies. Transaction, 5: 37–40.Google Scholar
Peristiany, J. G. (1965). Honor and shame: The values of Mediterranean society. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Peters, J. (1990). Cultural variations: Past and present. In Baker, M. (ed.), Families: Changing trends in Canada, 2nd edn., pp. 166–191. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
Phalet, K. and Schönpflug, U. (2001). Intergenerational transmission of collectivism and achievement values in two acculturation contexts: The case of Turkish families in Germany and Turkish and Moroccan families in the Netherlands. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32: 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pithon, G., Ho Can Sung, A., and Brochain, E. (2003, April). “Les parents des familles vulnérables et traditionnelles, vivant en France métropolitaine et en Martinique, préconisent-ils les mêmes modèles de bien traitance que ceux véhiculés par un programme en éducation parentale?” [Is it recommended that parents of vulnerable families in metropolitan France and Martinique use the same treatment models as those delivered by a programme of parental education?]. Paper presented at the International Congress AIFREF- EUSARF “In the best interests of the child: Cross-cultural perspectives”, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Pithon, G., Terrisse, B., Gordon, D., Prévôt, O., and Vallerand, S. (2004). La résolution de problèmes éducatifs: Entraînement interactif à la communication parents–enfants au moyen d'un programme de formation sur cédérom [The resolution of educational problems: Developing interactive communication between parents and children using a CD Rom teaching program]. In Palacio-Quintin, E., Bouchard, J. M., and Terrisse, B. (eds.), Questions d'éducation familliale, pp. 443–454. Brussels: Laval.Google Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H. and Vijver, F. J. R. (2000). How different are personality traits cross-culturally and how are they different? Contemporary Psychology, 45: 89–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H., and Vijver, F. J. R. van de (2004). Culture and cognition: Performance differences and invariant structures. In Sternberg, R. J. and Grigorenko, E. (eds.), Culture and competence: Context of life success, pp. 139–162. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popenoe, D. (1988). Disturbing the nest: Family change and decline in modern societies. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Popenoe, D. (1993). American family decline, 1960–1990: A review and appraisal. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55: 527–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popular Bank of Cyprus (2002). Kyprovarometro [Cyprusbarometer]. Nicosia, Cyprus: PBC.
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (2002a). Informe sobre desarrollo humano 2002 [2002 human development report]. Ciudad de México: Ediciones Mundi-Prensa.
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (2002b). Nosotros los chilenos: Un desafío cultural. Informe de desarrollo humano en Chile en 2002 [We, the Chileans: A cultural challenge. 2002 human development report for Chile]. Santiago: PNUD.
Psychogios, D. (1987). Prikes, fori, stafida kai psomi [Dowries, taxes, raisin and bread]. Athens, Greece: National Social Sciences Center.Google Scholar
Razi, Z. (1993). The myth of the immutable English family. Past and Present: A Journal of Historical Studies, 140: 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reca, I., Pérez, E., and Espíndola, E. (1996). Familias y hogares en situaciones críticas en Chile según censo 1992 [Families and households under critical conditions in Chile, according to 1992 census]. Documentos de Trabajo No. 46. Santiago: Servicio Nacional de la Mujer.
Reitz, J. G. (2001). Immigrant success in the knowledge economy: Institutional change and the immigrant experience in Canada, 1970–1995. Journal of Social Issues, 5: 579–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Religion Statistics Geography (2002). Religion by location index. Retrieved September, 2002, from http://adherents.com.
Requena, F. (1994). Redes de amistad, felicidad y familia [Networks of friendship, happiness, and family]. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 66: 73–89.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, D. (1997). O povo brasileiro: A formação e sentido do Brasil [Brazilian people: The formation and meaning of Brazil]. São Paulo, Brazil: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, R. M., Sabóia, A. L., Branco, H. C., and Bregman, S. (1998). Estrutura familiar, trabalho e renda [Family structure, work, and income]. In Kaloustian, S. M. (ed.), Família brasileira: a base de tudo, pp. 135–158. São Paulo, Brazil: Cortez and UNICEF.Google Scholar
Richard, L. L. (1980). Algeria. World Bibliographical Series, vol. 19. Oxford: Clio Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. E. L., Richards, L. N., and Bengtson, V. L. (1991). Intergenerational solidarity in families: Untangling the ties that bind. Marriage and Family Review, 16: 11–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G. (1997). Families, generations, and self. Ethos, 25: 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosquera, Rodriguez P. M., Manstead, A. S. R., and Fischer, A. H. (2002). Honor in the Mediterranean and northern Europe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33: 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanelli, G. (1997). Famílias de classes populares: Socialização e identidade masculina [Families of working classes: Socialization and masculine identity]. Cadernos de Pesquisa-NEP, 1–2: 25–34.
Romanelli, G. (1998). O relacionamento entre pais e filhos em famílias de camadas médias [Parent–child relationships in middle-class families]. Cadernos de Psicologia e Educação Paidéia, 8: 123–136.Google Scholar
Romanelli, G. (2000). Autoridade e poder na família [Authority and power in the family]. In Carvalho, M. C. B. (ed.), A família contemporânea em debate, pp. 73–88. São Paulo, Brazil: EDUC/Cortez.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. S. (1993). Intergenerational relations: Gender, norms, and behavior. In Bengtson, V. L. and Achenbaum, W. A. (eds.), The changing contract across generations, pp. 191–212. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roussel, L. and Bourguignon, O. (1976). La famille après le marriage des enfants [The family after marriage of the children] (Travaux et documents, no. 78). Paris: INED/PUF.Google Scholar
Ruble, D. N., Costanzo, P. R., and Oliveri, M. E. (1992). The social psychology of mental health. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55: 68–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. M. and Lynch, J. H. (1989). Emotional autonomy versus detachment: Revisiting the vicissitudes of adolescence and young adulthood. Child Development, 60: 340–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J., and Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14: 226–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saal, C. D. (1987). Alternative forms of living and housing. In Shangar-Handelman, L. and Palomba, R. (eds.), Alternative patterns of family life in modern societies. Rome: Collana Monografie.Google Scholar
Sachs, A. (1992). There's a constitution about. South Africa International, 22: 187–8.Google Scholar
Safilios-Rothschild, K. (1967). A comparison of power structure and marital satisfaction in urban Greek and French families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29: 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safilios-Rothschild, K. (1971). A cross-cultural examination of women's marital, educational and occupational options. Acta Sociologica, 14: 96–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salazar, G. (1990). Ser niño “huacho” en la historia de Chile (siglo XIX) [Being a bastard child in the history of Chile (nineteenth century)]. In Proposiciones, No. 19: Chile. Historia y “bajo pueblo,” pp. 55–83. Santiago: SUR Ediciones.
Salinas, R. (1994). Uniones ilegítimas y desuniones legítimas. El matrimonio y la formación de la pareja en Chile colonial [Illegitimate unions and legitimate splits. Marriage and partnership in colonial Chile]. In Gonzalbo, P. and Rabell, C. (eds.), La familia en el mundo iberoamericano, pp. 173–192. Ciudad de México: National Autonomous University of Mexico.Google Scholar
Sam, D. L. and Berry, J. W. (2006), (eds.) Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samara, E. M. (1992). Novas imagens da família “à brasileira” [New images of the Brazilian family]. Psicologia-USP, 3: 59–66.Google Scholar
Santos, N. R. (1998). Governo corta na saúde e educação para pagar uma dívida impagável [Government cuts on health and education to pay an invaluable debt]. Jornal da Ciência, 401: 7–8.Google Scholar
Sarvestani, K. K. (1998). The land of Mehr and Mah. Shiraz, Iran: Daneshnameh Pars Publishing.Google Scholar
Sass, J. and Ashford, L. (2002). Women of our world. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
Schmitt, E. (2001, May 15). For the first time, nuclear families drop below 25% of households. New York Times, 1.
Schneider, D. M. (1968). American kinship: A cultural account. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in twenty countries. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 25, pp. 1–65. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1994a). Are there universal aspects in the structure and content of human values?Journal of Social Issues, 50: 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1994b). Beyond individualism-collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Choi, S.-C., and Yoon, G. (eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications, pp. 85–119. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Seepe, S. (2004). Speaking truth to power. Pretoria, South Africa: Vista University and Skotaville Media.Google Scholar
Segalen, M. (1986). Historical anthropology of the family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segalen, M. (1996). Sociologie de la famille [Sociology of the family] (4th edn. 2000). Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Segall, M. H., Dasen, P. R., Berry, J. W., and Poortinga, Y. H. (1999). Human behavior in global perspective: An introduction to cross-cultural psychology, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Serrano, S. (1999). Quién quiere la educación? Estado y familia en Chile a mediados del siglo XIX [Who wants education? State and family in Chile by the middle of the twientieth century]. In Gonzalbo, P. (ed.), Familia y educación en Iberoamérica, pp.153–171. Ciudad de México: Centro de Estudios Históricos, El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Servicio Nacional de la Mujer, Republica de Chile (2001). Mujeres chilenas: Estadísticas para un nuevo siglo [Chilean women: Statistical data for a new century]. Santiago: SERNAM.
Setiloane, G. M. (1975). The ideal of God among the Sotho-Tswana. Leiden, The Netherlands: Balkema.Google Scholar
Seymour, D. C. (1999). Women, family, and child care in India: A world in transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shablia, O. (1995). Sotsiologia, ikonomika, geografia Ukrainee [Sociology, economy and geography of Ukraine]. Lviv, Ukraine: Zvit.Google Scholar
Shah, A. M. (1968). Changes in the Indian family. Economic and Political Weekly, 3: 127–135.Google Scholar
Shah, A. M. (1996). Is the joint household disintegrating? Economic and Political Weekly, 31: 537–542.Google Scholar
Shojaii, M. (2004). Iranian women are still waiting and hopeful [in Farsi]. Journal of Zanan, 110: 16–22.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A. and Sullivan, M. A. (1993). Cultural psychology: Who needs it?Annual Review of Psychology, 44: 497–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silitshena, P. M. A. (1982). The regrouping policy: The north-east district of Botswana. Ibadan, Nigeria: Heineman.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. and Bengtson, V. L. (1997). Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child–parent relationships in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 2: 429–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20: 580–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singelis, T. M. and Brown, W. P. (1995). Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior. Human Communication Research, 21: 354–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singelis, T. M. and Sharkey, W. F. (1995). Culture, self-construal, and embarrassability. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26: 622–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., and Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29: 240–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, D. (1988). The family scenario in a developing country and its implications for mental health: The case of India. In Dasen, P. R., Berry, J. W., and Sartorius, N. (eds.), Health and cross-cultural psychology: Toward applications, pp. 48–70. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sinha, D. (1991). Rise in the population of the elderly, familial changes and their psychosocial implications: The scenario of the developing countries. International Journal of Psychology, 26: 633–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, D. (1997). Indigenizing psychology. In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., and Pandey, J. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 1. Theory and method, 2nd edn., pp. 129–169. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Sinha, S. R. (1985). Maternal strategies for regulating children's behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16: 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skolnick, A. (1993). Change of heart: Family dynamics in historical perspective. In Cowan, P. A., Field, D., Hansen, D. A., Skolnick, A., and Swanson, G. E., (eds.), Family, self, and society, pp. 43–68. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slaughter, D. T. (ed.) (1988). Black children and poverty: A developmental perspective. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Brass.Google Scholar
Smith, S. (1995). Family theory and multicultural family studies. In Ingoldsby, B. and Smith, S. (eds.), Families in multicultural perspective, pp. 5–35. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B. and Bond, M. H. (1999). Social psychology across cultures, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., Ayestaran. S., Jesuíno, J. C., and Ferdman, B. M. (in press). Cultural values and decision behaviour in work organisations. In Ros, M. and Gouveia, V. V. (eds.), Social psychology of human values: Theoretical, methodological, and applied developments. La Coruña, Spain: Biblioteca Nueva.
Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Nederland (1995). Tijdopnamen [Time recordings]. The Hague, The Netherlands: SCP.
Song, M. (1997). Children's labour in ethnic family businesses: The case of Chinese take-away businesses in Britain. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 20: 690–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spasovska, L. (1985a). Pokolenia i semeistvo (sotsialni aspecti) [Generations and family (social aspects)]. Sofia, Bulgaria: Otechestven Front.Google Scholar
Spasovska, L. (1985b). Semeistvoto: Sociologicheski ocherk [The family: Sociological depiction]. Sofia, Bulgaria: BAN.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1876). Principles of sociology, vol. 1. London: Appleton.Google Scholar
Sperry, L. and Carlson, J. (1991). Marital therapy: Integrating theory and technique. Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Spielmann, K. A. and Eder, J. F. (1994). Hunters and farmers: Then and now. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23: 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, J. (1993). Good riddance to “the family”: A response to David Popenoe. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55: 545–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standley, K. (1993). Family law. Houndmills and London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, J. (1989). The role of Turkish secular law in changing the lives of rural Muslim women, 1950–1970. Law and Society Review, 23: 497–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State Department of Statistics for Georgia (2000). Statistical Yearbook of Georgia – 2000. Tbilisi, Georgia: SDS.
State Department of Statistics for Georgia (2001). Households in Georgia – 2000. Tbilisi, Georgia: SDS.
State Institute of Statistics, Republic of Turkey (1991). Statistical Indicators, 1923–90. Ankara, Turkey: SIS. Retrieved from http://www.die.gov.tr.
State Institute of Statistics, Republic of Turkey (2001). Women's indicators and statistics. Ankara, Turkey: SIS. Retrieved from http://www.die.gov.tr.
Statistical Service of the Republic of Cyprus (2003). Demographic report 2000. Nicosia, Cyprus: Government Printing Office.
Statistisches Bundesamt, Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1999). Datenreport. Zahlen und Fakten über die Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Schriftenreihe der Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Band 365) [Data report. Numbers and facts about the Federal Republic of Germany (Paper series of the Federal Office for Political Education, vol. 365)]. Bonn: Germany.
Steil, J. M. (2001). Family forms and member well-being: A research agenda for the decade of behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25: 344–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, L. and Silverberg, S. B. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development, 57: 841–851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steward, J. (1955). The concept and method of cultural ecology: Theory of culture change. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. M., Bond, M. H., Chan, W.Zaman, R. M., Dar, R., and Anwar, M.(2003). Autonomy from parents and psychological adjustment in an interdependent culture. Psychology in developing societies, 15: 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, S. M., Bond, M. H., Deeds, O., and Chung, S. F. (1999). Intergenerational patterns of values and autonomy expectations in cultures of relatedness and separateness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30: 575–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, S. M., Bond, M. H., Ho, L. M., Zaman, R. M., Dar, R., and Anwar, M. (2000). Perceptions of parents and adolescent outcomes in Pakistan. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18: 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, S. M., Bond, M. H., Zaman, R. M., McBride-Chang, C., Rao, N., and Fielding, R. (1999). Functional parenting in Pakistan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23: 747–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, S. M., Zaman, R. M., and Dar, R. (in press). Pakistani mothers perceptions of autonomy as a psychological need. Psychology and Developing Societies.
Sugareva, M. (1996). Balgarskoto semeistvo v prehoda kam pazarna ikonomika [The Bulgarian family in the transition period]. Sofia, Bulgaria: Fondation “Svobodna Initsiativa.”Google Scholar
Sumbadze, N. (1999). Social web: Friendships of adult men and women. Leiden, The Netherlands: DSWO Press.Google Scholar
Sunar, D. (1988). Attitudes of Turkish students toward elderly relatives. Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 3: 41–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunar, D. (2002). Change and continuity in the Turkish middle-class family. In Ozdalga, E. and Liljestrom, R. (eds.), Autonomy and dependence in family: Turkey and Sweden in critical perspective, pp. 217–237. Istanbul, Turkey: Swedish Research Institute.Google Scholar
Sunar, D. and Fisek, G. (2004). Contemporary Turkish families. In Gielen, U. and Roopnarine, J. (eds.), Families in global perspective. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Swaan, A. (1988). In care of the state: Health care, education and welfare in Europe and the USA in the modern era. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Swatridge, L. A., Wright, I. A., Hildebrand, W., Oliver, C. A., and Pyzer, G. D. (2000). Canada: Exploring new directions, 4th edn. Ottawa: Fitzhenry and Whiteside Ltd.Google Scholar
Sybstelniy, O. (1991). Ukraina istoria [History of Ukraine]. Kiev, Ukraine: Lubid.Google Scholar
Takano, Y. and Osaka, E. (1999). An unsupported common view: Comparing Japan and the US on individualism/collectivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2: 311–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmon-Garber, Y. (1970). Social change and kinship ties. In Hill, R. and Konig, R. (eds.), Families in east and west: Socialization process and kinship, pp. 504–524. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. D. and Wang, M. C. (eds.) (2000). Resilience across contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Telbizov, K. (1946). Zemedelskoto semeistvo [The agrarian family]. Varna, Bulgaria: Fond Nauchni Izledrania.Google Scholar
Ten Berge, J. M. F. (1986). Rotatie naar perfecte congruentie en de Multipele Groep Methode [Rotation to pefect congruence and the Multiple Group Method]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 41: 218–225.Google Scholar
Thiersch, F. (1833). De l'état actuel de la Grece [On the contemporary situation of Greece]. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Thorton, A. (1984). Modernization and family change. In Social Change and Family Policies. Proceedings of the twentieth International CFR Seminar. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Thorton, A. and Fricke, T. E. (1987). Social change and the family: Comparative perspectives from the west. Sociological Forum, 2: 746–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timur, S. (1972). Türkiye'de Aile Yapisi [Family structure in Turkey]. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayinlari.
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20: 410–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Kruger, A., and Ratner, H. (1993). Culture learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16: 495–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J. and Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, pp. 19–136. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Torres, C. V. (1999). “Leadership style norms among Americans and Brazilians: Assessing differences using Jackson's return potential model.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA.
Torres, C. V. and Dessen, M. A. (2004). Brazilian culture, family, and its ethnic-cultural variety. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Triandis, H. C. (1987). Collectivism vs. individualism: A reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural psychology. In Bagley, C. and Verma, G. K. (eds.), Personality, cognition, and values: Cross-cultural perspectives on childhood and adolescence, pp. 2–42. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: West view.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., and Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-group relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C. and Vassiliou, V. (1972). An analysis of subjective culture. In Triandis, H. C. (ed.), The analysis of subjective culture, pp. 299–335. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Troadec, B. (2001). Le modèle écoculturel: Un cadre pour la psychologie culturelle comparative [The ecocultural model: A framework for comparative cultural psychology]. International Journal of Psychology, 36: 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, W. S., Lin, T. Y., and Yeh, E. K. (1995). Chinese societies and mental health. In Lin, T. Y., Tseng, W. S., and Yeh, E. K. (eds.), Chinese societies and mental health, pp. 3–18. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tsoukalas, K. (1982). Exartisi kai anaparagogi. O koinonikos rolos ton ekpadeftikon micharismon stin Ellada (1830–1922) [Dependence and reproduction. The social role of educational procedures in Greece (1830–1922)]. Athens: Themelio.Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analytic studies (Personnel Research Section Report No. 984). Washington, DC: Department of the Army.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuijl, C., Leseman, P. P. M., and Rispens, J. (2001). Efficacy of an intensive home based educational intervention programme for 4- to 6-year-old ethnic minority children in the Netherlands. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(2): 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tylor, E. B. (1889). On a method of investigation the development of institutions: Applied to laws of marriage and descent. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 18: 245–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNICEF (2000). Children and women in Georgia: A situational analysis. Tbilisi, Georgia.
UNICEF/National Planning Commission (1998). Child survival, protection and development in Nigeria: Key social statistics. Abuja, Nigeria.
United Nations Statistics Division (2002a). Demographic, Social and Housing Statistics. Retrieved September, 2002, from http://unstats.un.org/unsd.
United Nations Statistics Division (2002b). Energy Statistics. Retrieved September, 2002, from http://unstats.un.org/unsd.
United States Census Bureau (2000). Statistical abstract of the United States: 2000. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Uzoka, A. F. (1979). The myth of the nuclear family. American Psychologist, 34: 1095–1106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdés, X. (1995). Familia, matrimonio e ilegitimidad en la hacienda del siglo XX [Family, marriage and illegitimate children in the twentieth century estate]. Proposiciones, 26, Aproximaciones a la Familia: 150–165. Santiago: Ediciones SUR.Google Scholar
Valero, A. (1995). El sistema familiar español: Recorrido a través del último cuarto de siglo [The Spanish family system: journey through the last quarter of the century]. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 70: 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaskovics, L. A., Garhammer, M., Schneider, N. F., and Job, O. (1994). Familien und Haushaltsstrukturen in der ehemaligen DDR und in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland von 1980–1989: Ein Vergleich [Family and household structures in the former GDR and the Federal Republic of Germany, 1980–1989: A comparison]. Materialien zur Bevölkerungswissenschaft, special issue 24. Wiesbaden: Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung.
Vassiliou, G. (1966). Dierevnisis metavliton ypiserchomenon is tin psychodynamikin tis Ellinikis oikogenias [An exploration of psychodynamic variables of Greek family]. Athens: Athenian Institute of Anthropos.Google Scholar
Vassiliou, V. and Vassiliou, G. (1973). The implicative meaning of the Greek concept of philotimo. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4: 326–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vayda, A. P. and McKay, B. (1975). New directions in ecology and ecological anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 4: 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vayda, A. P. and Rappoport, R. (1968). Ecology, cultural and non-cultural. In Clifton, J. (ed.), Cultural anthropology, pp. 477–497. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Vijver, F. J. R. van de (2006). Culture and psychology: A SWOT analysis of cross-cultural psychology. In Jing, Q., Zhang, H., and Zhang, K. (eds.), Psychological science around the world, vol. 2, pp. 279–298. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Vijver, F. J. R. and Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analyses for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Vijver, F. J. R. and Poortinga, Y. H. (2002). Structural equivalence in multilevel research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33: 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadia, D. N. (1966). The geology of India, 3rd edn. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wagstaff, M. (2001). Family size in the Peloponnese (southern Greece) in 1700. Journal of Family History, 26: 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, J. and Heydari, J. (1995). Iran. Earth, wind and water. Tehran, Iran: Yassavoli Press.Google Scholar
Warrin, J., Solomon, Y., Lewis, C., and Langford, W. (1999). Fathers, work and family life. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.Google Scholar
Watkins, D., Mortazavi, S., and Trofimova, I. (2000). Independent and interdependent conceptions of self: An investigation of age, gender and culture differences in importance and satisfaction ratings. Cross Cultural Research, 34: 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. ([1904] 1958). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Translated by Parsons, T.. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Weisner, T. S., Bradley, C., and Kilbride, P. L. (1997). African families and the crisis of social change. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Weiss, J. (2000). To have and to hold: Marriage, the baby boom, and social change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Werner, C., Brown, B., and Altman, I. (1997). Environmental psychology. In Berry, J. W., Segall, M. H., and Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural Psychology, vol. 3 Social behavior and applications, pp. 253–290. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Westen, D. (1985). Self and society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westermarck, E. A. (1894–1901). History of human marriage.Google Scholar
White, L. and Rogers, S., (2000). Economic circumstances and family outcomes: A review of the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62: 1035–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, B. D. and Popenoe, D. (2003). The state of our unions: The social health of marriage in America. The National Marriage Project. Retrieved from http://marriage.rutgers. edu/Publications.
Whiten, A., Goodall, J., McGrew, W. C., Nishida, T., Reynolds, V., Sugiyama, Y., Tutin, C. E. G., Wrangham, R. W., and Boesch, C. (1999). Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature, 399: 682–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiting, J. W. M. (1974). A model for psychocultural research. Annual Report, Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Whiting, J. W. M. (1981). Environmental constraints on infant care practices. In Munroe, R. H., Munroe, R. L., and Whiting, B. B. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural development, pp. 155-179. New York: GarlandGoogle Scholar
Whiting, J. W. M. and Child, I. L. (1953). Child training and personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wilke, J. R. (1993). Changes in US mens' attitudes toward the family provider role, 1972–1989. Gender and Society, 2: 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. E. and Best, D. L. (1982). Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty nation study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Williams, J. E. and Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Williams, J. E., Satterwhite, R. C., and Saiz, J. L. (1998). The importance of psychological traits: A cross-cultural study. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Williamson, J., Softas-Nall, B., and Miller, J. (2003). Experiences and emotions of grandparents raising grandchildren: Their experiences and emotions. The Family Journal, 11: 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witkin, H. and Berry, J. W. (1975). Psychological differentiation in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6: 4–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2000). Living standards measurement study. Washington, DC: DECRG-LSMS section.
World Bank (2002). World development report 2002. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wu, D. Y. H. and Tseng, W. S. (1985). Introduction: The characteristics of Chinese culture. In Tseng, W. S. and Wu, D. Y. H. (eds.), Chinese culture and mental health, pp. 3–13. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, S. J. (1979). Family and household: The analysis of domestic groups. Annual Review of Anthropology, 8: 161–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. F. (1988). Familism and development: An examination of the role of family in contemporary China Mainland, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. In Sinha, D. and Kao, H. S. R. (eds.), Social values and development: Asian perspectives, pp. 93–123. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Yang, K.-S. (1986). Chinese personality and its change. In Bond, M. H. (ed.), The psychology of Chinese people, pp. 106–170. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, K. S. (1995). Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis. In Lin, T. Y., Tseng, W. S., and Yeh, E. K. (eds.), Chinese societies and mental health, pp. 19–39. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, K. S. (1996). The psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of societal modernization. In Bond, M. H. (ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology, pp. 479–498. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yeh, M. H. (1990). “Chinese familism and its change” [In Chinese]. Unpublished manuscript.
Young, M. and Willmott, P. (1957). Family and kinship in East London. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Zach, U. (2003). Familien im Kulturvergleich [Families across cultures]. In Keller, H. (ed.), Handbuch der Kleinkindforschung, 3rd edn., pp. 321–352. Bern, Germany: Huber.Google Scholar
Zadoenko, L. (1999). Shlioybi i rozlutsenia v Ukraini [Marriage and divorce in Ukraine]. Retrieved November 20, 2002, from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua.
Zaman, R. M. (1992). Psychotherapy in the Third World: Some impressions from Pakistan. In Gielen, U. P., Adler, L. L., and Milgram, N. A. (eds.), Psychology in international perspective, pp. 314–321. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Zatsepin, V. I. (1991). Molodaya semya [Young family]. Kiev, Ukraine.Google Scholar
Zill, N., and Rogers, C. (1988). Recent trends in the well-being of children in the United States and their implications for public policy. In Cherlin, A. J., (ed.), The changing American family and public policy, pp. 31–115. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Zinkewych, O. and Hula, V. (1993) Ukraine. Ellicott City, MD: Smoloskyp.Google Scholar
Aberle, D. F., Cohen, A. K., Davis, A., Levy, M., and Sutton, F. X. (1950). Functional prerequisites of society. Ethics, 60: 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acar, F. (1991). Women in academic science careers in Turkey. In Stolte-Heiskanen, V., Acar, F., Ananieva, N. and Gaudart, D. (eds.), Women in science: Token women or gender equality?, pp. 147–171. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Achoui, M. (1983). “The impact of ideology and organizational power on communication: A comparative perspective.” Unpublished doctoral thesis, Rensselear Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York.
Adeniyi, A. M. and Mivanyi, Y. J. (1999, August). Nutrition, child development and single parenthood in Kaduna metropolis, Kaduna, Nigeria. Paper presented at the IXth European Conference on Developmental Psychology, island of Spetses, Greece.
Aerts, E. (1993). Bringing the institution back in. In Cowan, P. A., Field, D., Hansen, D. A., Skonick, A. and Swanson, G. E. (eds.), Family, self, and society, pp. 3–41. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ahmad, M. B. (1982). The Muslim family laws. Lahore: Kausar Brothers.Google Scholar
Ahnert, L., Krätzig, S., Meischner, T., and Schmidt, A. (1994). Sozialisationskonzepte für Kleinkinder: Wirkungen tradierter Erziehungsvorstellungen und staatssozialistischer Erziehungsdoktrinen im intra- und interkulturellen Ost–West-Vergleich [Socialization concepts of infants: Effects of traditional pedagogic concepts and governmental socialist pedagogic doctrines in an intra- and intercultural east–west comparison]. In Trommdsdorff, G. (ed.), Psychologische Aspekte des sozio-politischen Wandels in Ostdeutschland, pp. 94–110. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahnert, L., Meischner, T., and Schmidt, A. (1995). Äquivalenzen in frühkindlichen Interaktionsmustern: Ein Vergleich von russischen und deutschen Mutter–Kind-Dyaden [Similarities in early interactional patterns: A comparison of Russian and German mother–child dyads]. In Trommsdorff, G. (ed.), Kindheit und Jugend in verschiedenen Kulturen, pp. 65–81. Weinheim/Munich: Juventa Verlag.Google Scholar
Akande, A. (2000). School-related fears in children and their relationship to worries and anxiety in the twenty-first century Southern Africa. Studia Psychologica, 42: 303–360.Google Scholar
Akande, A. (2002). “Lifeworlds in southern African states.” Unpublished paper, University of Bath.
Akande, A.(2004). “Seek and ye shall find: Rethinking higher education in (South) Africa–Quo Vadis?” Unpublished paper, Institute of Research and Consultancy, South Africa.
Al-Badran, K. and Rwished, F. (1989). An empirical study for marriage contract in the eastern region of the Saudi Arabia Kingdom. Studies and issues from the Arab Gulf society [Arabic text] (Social and Labor Studies Series, N14, The Executive Bureau of the Ministry Council of Labor and Social Affairs of the Arab Gulf States Cooperation Counsel). Bahrain: Al-Manama.
Al-Khalifa, A. H. (1990). Social factors impact on population distribution in Riyadh City neighborhoods: An empirical study [Arabic text]. Riyadh: Center of Crime Research.Google Scholar
Al-Khariji, A. (1983). Systems of the Muslim society with application on the Saudi society [Arabic text]. Jeddah: Ramta.Google Scholar
Al-Masa'ad, A. (1995). “Social change and neighborhood relationship: An empirical study in Al-Malz area in Riyadh City” [Arabic text]. Unpublished master's thesis. College of Social Sciences, Al-Imam Saud University.
Al-Saif, M. I. (1997). Introduction to the study of Saudi society [Arabic text]. Riyadh: Al-Khariji.Google Scholar
Alberdi, I. (1995). Informe sobre la situación de la familia en España [Report on the situation of the family in Spain]. Madrid: Ministerio de Asuntos Sociales.Google Scholar
Alberdi, I.(1999). La nueva familia española [The new Spanish family]. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
Albrow, M. and King, E. (1990). Globalization, knowledge and society: Readings from international sociology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Alcock, J. (1998). Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach. Sunderland, MS: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Alexandrova, T. A. (1990). Koe-chto o dedoushkah [Something about grandparents]. Moscow: Znanie.Google Scholar
Allan, G. (1985). Family life. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Allik, J. and McCrae, R. R. (2004). Towards a geography of personality traits: Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35: 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amado, G. and Vinagre-Brasil, H. (1991). Organizational behaviors and cultural context: The Brazilian “jeitinho.”International Studies of Management and Organization, 2: 38–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amani, M. (2001). General demography of Iran. [In Farsi]. Tehran: Samt.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. (1971). Family structure in XIXth century Lancashire. Cambridge Studies in Sociology no. 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, P. (1990). Economic conditions and family structures. In Baker, M. (ed.), Families: Changing trends in Canada, 2nd edn., pp. 67–92. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
Arriagada, I. (2002). Cambios y desigualdad en las familias latinoamericanas [Changes and inequality in the Latin American families]. Revista de la CEPAL, 77: 143–161.Google Scholar
Asante, M. K. (1993). Malcom X as cultural hero and other Afrocentric essays. New Jersey: Africa World Press.Google Scholar
Ataca, B. (1992). “An investigation of variance in fertility due to sex-related differentiation in child-rearing practices.” Unpublished master's thesis, Bogazici University, Istanbul.
Ataca, B., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., and Diri, A. (2005). The Turkish family and the value of children: Trends over time. In Trommsdorff, G. and Nauck, B., (eds.), The value of children in cross-cultural perspectives. Berlin: Pabst.Google Scholar
Ataca, B. and Sunar, D. (1999). Continuity and change in Turkish urban family life. Psychology and Developing Societies, 11: 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attalides, M. (1981). Social change and urbanization in Cyprus: A study of Nicosia. Nicosia, Cyprus: Zavallis Press.Google Scholar
Attias-Donfut, C., Lapierre, N., and Segalen, M. (2002). Le nouvel esprit de famille [The new family spirit]. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Attias-Donfut, C. and Segalen, M. (1998). Grands-parents: La famille à travers les generations [Grandparents: The family across generations]. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Avort, A., , Cuyvers P., and Hoog, K. (1996). Het Nederlandse gezinsleven aan het einde van de twintigste eeuw [Family life in the Netherlands at the end of the twentieth century]. The Hague: Nederlandse Gezinsraad.Google Scholar
Aydin, B. and Oztutuncu, F. (2001). Examination of adolescents' negative thoughts, depressive mood, and family environment. Adolescence, 36: 77–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Azuma, H. (1986). Why study child development in Japan. In Stevenson, H., Azuma, H., and Hakuta, K. (eds.), Child development and education in Japan, pp. 3–12. New York: W H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Badan Pusat Statistik, Indonesia (1996). Survei penduduk antar sensus 1995. Jakarta, Indonesia: BPS-Statistics Indonesia.
Bainame, K., Letamo, G., and Majelantle, R. G. (2002). “The effects of rural inequalities of fertility and migration in Botswana.” Unpublished paper, Gaborone, Botswana.
Baker, M. and Dryden, J. (1993). Families in Canadian society. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
Baldi, S., Perie, M., Skidmore, D., Greenberg, E., and Hahn, C. (2001). Highlights of US results from the International IEA Civic Education Study (CivEd). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, USA. Retrieved from http://www.nces.ed.gov/timss.
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bales, R. F. and Slater, P. (1955). Roles differentiation in small decision-making groups. In Parsons, T. and Bales, R. F. (eds.), Family, socialization and interaction process, pp. 259–306. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ballard, R. and Kalra, V. S. (1994). The ethnic dimensions of the 1991 census: A preliminary report. Manchester: Manchester Census Group, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Bank of Botswana (2001). “Botswana.” Unpublished report, Government Press, Gaborone, Botswana.
Barnett, R. C. and Shen, Y. (1997). Gender, high- and low-schedule control, housework tasks, and psychological distress: A study of dual-earner couples. Journal of Family Issues, 18: 403–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, H., Child, I., and Bacon, M. (1959). Relations of child training to subsistence economy. American Anthropologist, 61: 51–63.Google Scholar
Basaran, F. A. (1974). Psychosocial development: A study of children ages 7–11 [Turkish text]. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara University Press. (Reprint from Research VII, 1969).Google Scholar
Bastug, S. (2002). Household and family in Turkey: An historical perspective. In Ozdalga, E. and Liljestrom, R. (eds.), Autonomy and dependence in family: Turkey and Sweden in critical perspective, pp. 99–115. Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute.Google Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1980). New directions in socialization research. American Psychologist, 35: 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawin-Legros, B. (1988). Familles, mariage, divorce: Une sociologie des comportements familiaux contemporains [Families, marriage, divorce: Sociology of contemporary family behavior]. Liège, Belgium: Pierre Mardaga.Google Scholar
Beiser, M., Hou, F., Hyman, I., and Tousignant, M. (2002). Poverty, family process and the mental health of immigrant children in Canada. American Journal of Public Health, 92: 220–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beishon, S., Modood, T., and Virdee, S. (1998). Ethnic minority families. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Bender, D. R. (1967). A refinement of the concept of household: Families, co-residence, and domestic functions. American Anthropologist, 69: 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, R. (1967). Tradition and modernity reconsidered. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 9: 292–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, V. L. and Schrader, S. S. (1982). Parent–child relations. In Mangen, D. J. and Peterson, W. A. (eds.), Research instruments in social gerontology, vol. 2, pp. 115–128. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (1976). The ecological transition. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Beny, R., Nasr, S. M., and Bakhtiar, M. (1975). Iran, the bridge of turquoise. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart Ltd.Google Scholar
Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1999). La construcción social de la realidad [The social construction of reality]. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.Google Scholar
Berghe, P. L. (1979). Human family systems: An evolutionary view. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Berik, G. (1995). Towards an understanding of gender hierarchy in Turkey: A comparative analysis of carpet-weaving villages. In Tekeli, S. (ed.), Women in modern Turkish society: A reader, pp. 112–127. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Berkner, L. K. (1975). The use and misuse of census data for the historical analysis of family structure. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 5: 721–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernardes, J. (1997). Family studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1966). Temne and Eskimo perceptual skills. International Journal of Psychology, 1: 207–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W.(1967). Independence and conformity in subsistence-level societies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7: 415–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W.(1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4: 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1975). An ecological approach to cross-cultural psychology. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 30: 51–84.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1976). Human ecology and cognitive style: Comparative studies in cultural and psychological adaptation. New York: Sage/Halsted.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1979). A cultural ecology of social behavior. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 12, pp. 177–206. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1985). Cultural psychology and ethnic psychology. In Reyes, I.Lagunes, and Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), From a different perspective, pp. 3–15. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1994a). Ecology of individualism and collectivism. In Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Choi, S.-C., and Yoon, G. (eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications, pp. 77–84. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. (1994b). An ecological approach to cultural and ethnic psychology. In Trickett, E. (ed.), Human Diversity, pp. 115–141. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarPubMed
Berry, J. W. (1995). The descendants of a model. Culture and Psychology, 1: 373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. (2000). Cross-cultural psychology: A symbiosis of cultural and comparative approaches. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3: 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. Bennett, J. A., and Denny. P. (2000, July). Ecology, culture and cognitive processing. Paper presented at the fifteenth Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, Pultusk, Poland.
Berry, J. W., Dasen, P. R., and Witkin, H. A. (1983). Developmental theories in cross-cultural perspective. In Alder, L. (ed.), Cross-cultural research at issue, pp. 13–21. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. and Kalin, R. (2000). Multicultural policy and social psychology: The Canadian experience. In Renshon, S. and Duckitt, J. (eds.), Political psychology: Cultural and cross-cultural foundations, pp. 263–284. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, J. W. and Kim, U. (1993). The way ahead: From indigenous psychologies to a universal psychology. In Kim, U. and Berry, J. W. (eds.), Indigenous psychologies, pp. 277–280. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Pandey, J., Dasen, P. R., Saraswathi, T. S., Segall, M. H., and Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., (eds.). (1997). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, 2nd edn., vols. 1–3. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., and Dasen, P. R. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., Koppel, J. M. H., Sénéchal, C., Annis, R. C., Bahuchet, S., Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Witkin, H. A. (1986). On the edge of the forest: Cultural adaptation and cognitive development in Central Africa. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Biasoli-Alves, Z. M. M. (1997). Famílias brasileiras do século XX: Os valores e as práticas de educação da criança [Brazilian families in the twentieth century: Child rearing values and practices]. Temas em Psicologia, 3: 33–49.Google Scholar
Blair, S. L., Blair, M., and Madamba, A. (1999). Racial/ethnic differences in High school students' academic performance: Understanding the interleave of social class and ethnicity in the family context. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 30: 539–555.Google Scholar
Blood, R. O. and Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives. The dynamics of married living. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Blos, P. (1979). The adolescent passage. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Blumberg, R. L. and Winch, R. F. (1972). Societal complexity and familial complexity: Evidence for the curvilinear hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology, 77: 898–920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boesch, C. (1991). Teaching among wild chimpanzees. Animal Behavior, 41: 530–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogardus, E. S. (1925). Measuring social distance. Journal of Applied Sociology, 9: 299–308.Google Scholar
Bogenschneider, K. (2000). Has family policy come of age? A decade review of the state of US family policy in the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62: 1136–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohannan, P. (1963). Social anthropology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Boiko, V. V. (1980). Molodetnaya semya [Families with small numbers of children]. Moscow: Statistic.Google Scholar
Bond, R. and Smith, P. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119: 111–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonke, J. (2004a). Modern man: The slow move towards equality. European Observatory on the Social Situation, Demography, and the Family. SDF Puzzle. Retrieved from http://www.oif.ac.at/sdf/sdf_05_2004.html.
Bonke, J. (2004b). The modern husband/father and wife/mother. How do they spend their time? European Observatory on the Social Situation, Demography, and the Family. SDF Puzzle. Retrieved from http://www.oif.ac.at/sdf/sdf_05_2004.html.
Borisenko, B. K. (1998). Vesylny zvuchai ta obriady na Ukraini [Marriage customs in Ukraine]. Kiev: Naukova dumka.Google Scholar
Bott, E. (1971). Family and social networks: Roles, norms, and external relationships in ordinary urban families. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Boutafnoushat, M. (1984). The Algerian family [Arabic text]. Algiers: University Publications National Office.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. (1983). Why is culture adaptive?Quarterly Review of Biology, 58: 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brannon, L. (2002). Gender: Psychological perspectives, 3rd edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Bravo, G. (1990). Imágenes de la vida cotidiana chilena, 1850–1930. Consideraciones sobre el matrimonio y la familia [Images of the Chilean daily life, 1850–1930. Considerations about marriage and family]. In Pinto, S. (ed.), Familia, matrimonio y mestizaje en Chile colonial, pp. 85–102. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.Google Scholar
Bretschneider, P. (1995). Polygyny: A cross-cultural study. Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Brewster, K. L. and Padavic, I. (2000). Change in gender-ideology, 1977–1996: The contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62: 477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bril, B. (1995). Les apports de la psychologie culturelle comparative à la compréhenson du développement de l'enfant [The relevance of comparative cultural psychology to the comprehension of child development]. In Lautrey, J. (ed.), Universel et différentiel en psychologie, pp. 327–349. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Brink, G. (1996). De grote overgang. Een lokaal onderzoek naar de modernisering van het bestaan. Woensel, 1670–1920 [The big transition. A local inquiry into the modernization of every day life. Woensel, 1670–1920]. Nijmegen: SUN.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. and Weiss, H. B. (1983). Beyond policies without people: An ecological perspective on child and family policy. In Zigler, E., Kagan, S. L., and Klugman, E. (eds.), Children, families and government: Perspectives on American social policy, pp. 393–414. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brune, N., Bulgutch, M., Fielding, J., Faulknor, A., Hawes, R., and O'Neill, M. (2003). Defining Canada: History, identity, and culture. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
Brunner, J. J. (1990). Tradicionalismo y modernidad en la cultura latinoamericana [Traditionalism and modernity in Latin American culture]. Documentos de Trabajo, Serie Educación y Cultura, No. 4. Santiago: FLACSO.
Buah, F. K. (1960). Modern history since 1750. Stella Marris College London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bulcroft, R. A. and Bulcroft, K. A. (1993). Race differences in attitudinal and motivational factors in the decision to marry. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55: 338–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, E. and Milardo, R. M. (1995). Manital independence and social networks. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12: 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, E. W. (1926). The family as a unity of interacting personalities. Family, 7: 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, M. L. (1996). Intergenerational patterns of providing care in African-American families with teenage childbearers: Emergent patterns in an ethnographic study. In Bengtson, V. L., Schaie, K. W., and , L. M.Burton, (eds.), Adult intergenerational relations: Effects of social change, pp. 79–96. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Burton, M. L. and Jarrett, R. L. (2000). In the mix, yet on the margins: The place of families in urban neighborhood and child development research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62: 1114–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, M. L., Moore, C. C., Whiting, J. W. M., and Romney, A. K. (1996). Regions based on social structure. Current Anthropology, 37: 87–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussemaker, J. (1997). Overheid, gezin en sekse: Naar een nieuwe consensus [Government, family and gender: Towards a new consensus]. Jaarboek Gezinsbeleid. The Hague: Nederlandse Gezinsraad.Google Scholar
Cadolle, S. (2000). La décomposition de la famille [The disintegration of the family]. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Cândido, A. (1972). The Brazilian family. In Smith, T. L. and Marchant, A. (eds.), Brasil: Portrait of half a continent, pp. 291–312. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Carlos, M. L. and Sellers, L. (1972). Family, kinship structure, and modernization in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 7: 95–124.Google Scholar
Carter, B. and McGoldrick, M. (1999). The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Carvalho, M. C. B. (2000). O lugar da família na política social [The family within the social policy]. In Carvalho, M. C. B. (ed.), A família contemporânea em debate, pp. 13–21. São Paulo, Brazil: EDUC/Cortez.Google Scholar
Cassia, P. S. and Bada, C. (1992). The making of the modern Greek family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cavieres, E. (1990). Aspectos materiales y sentimentales de la familia tradicional colonial [Material and affective issues of the colonial traditional family]. In Pinto, S. (ed.), Familia, matrimonio y mestizaje en Chile colonial, pp. 51–67. Santiago: Universidad de Chile.Google Scholar
Cavieres, E. (1997). Transgresiones al matrimonio en Chile tradicional: Las faltas a la ley y a la fe [Transgressions to marriage in traditional Chile: Faults to the law and to the faith]. In Gonzalbo, P. (ed.), Género, familia y mentalidades en América Latina, pp. 39–60. San Juan: Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
Census of Canada (2001, 1996, 1991, 1986). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Ministerio de la Presidencia, Reino de España (1999). Los jóvenes de hoy [Today's youth]. Madrid: CIS.
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Ministerio de la Presidencia, Reino de España (2002a, May–August). Estudio no. 2443–Actitudes y creencias religiosas. Boletín Datos de Opinión no. 29 [Study no. 2443–Religious beliefs and attitudes. Opinion Data Bulletin no. 29]. Madrid: CIS. Retrieved from http://www.cis.es.
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Ministerio de la Presidencia, Reino de España (2002b, December). Estudio no. 2474 – Barómetro de opinión de diciembre. Expectativas 2003 [Study no. 2474 – December opinion barometer. 2003 Expectatives]. Madrid: CIS. Retrieved from http://www.cis.ess.
Cha, J. H. (1994). Changes in value, belief, attitude and behavior of the Koreans over the past 100 years. Korean Journal of Psychology: Social, 8: 40–58.Google Scholar
Chadwick, B. A. and Heaton, T. B. (1999). Statistical handbook on the American family. Phoenix, AZ: Orynx Press.Google Scholar
Cheal, D. (1993). Unity and the difference in postmodern families. Journal of Family Issues, 14: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chirkov, V., Kim, Y., Ryan, R., and Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 97–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chou, K.-L. (2000). Emotional autonomy and depression among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 161: 161–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christakopoulou, S. and Dawson, J. (2000). Community well-being in West Humberstone. Chester: Jon Dawson and Associates.Google Scholar
Chun, K., Balls-Organista, P., and Marin, G. (2003). Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement and applied research. Washington: APA Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mawhaw, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cohler, B. and Geyer, S. (1982). Psychological autonomy and interdependence within the family. In Walsh, F. (ed.), Normal family processes, pp. 196–227. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Cole, D. P. (1973). The enmeshment of nomads in Saudi Arabian society: The case of Murrah. In Nelson, C. (ed.), The desert and the sown: Nomads in wider society, pp. 113–128. Research Series, N21. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Collier, S. (1985). Chile from independence to the war of the Pacific. In Bethell, L. (ed.), The Cambridge history of Latin America, vol. 3, pp. 583–613. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, J. and Yanagisako, S. I. (1987). Gender and kinship: Essays toward a unified analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, Naciones Unidas (2000). Las mujeres chilenas en los noventa: Hablan las cifras [Chilean women in the nineties: Data's evidences]. Santiago: CEPAL/SERNAM.
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, Naciones Unidas (2001). Social panorama of Latin America 2000–2001. Retrieved from http://www.eclac.cl.
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, Naciones Unidas (2002). Anuario estadístico de América Latina y el Caribe 2001 [2001 Statistical yearbook of Latin America and the Caribbean]. Retrieved from http://www.eclac.cl.
Comision Nacional de la Familia, Republica de Chile (1993). Informe de la Comisión Nacional de la Familia [Family National Commission Report]. Santiago: Servicio Nacional de la Mujer.
Contreras, J. (1991). Los grupos domésticos: Estrategias de producción y de reproducción [Domestic groups: strategies of production and reproduction]. In Prat, J., Martínez, U., Contreras, J. and Moreno, I. (eds.), Antropología de los pueblos de España, pp. 343–380. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
Coontz, S. (2000). Historical perspectives on family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62: 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, D. (1971). The death of the family. Norwich: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Cowan, P. A. (1993). The sky is falling, but Popenoe's analysis won't help us do anything about it. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55: 548–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cribier, F. (1981). Changing retirement patterns: The experience of a cohort of Parisian salaried workers. Ageing and Society, 1: 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, P. and Santiago, P. (1998). Juventud y entorno familiar [Youth and family environment]. Madrid: Instituto de la Juventud.Google Scholar
Curtis, G. E. (1992). Bulgaria: A country study. Sofia, Bulgaria: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. Retrieved from http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/bgtoc.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuyvers, P. (2000). You can't have it all – at least at the same time: Segmentation in the modern life course as a threat to intergenerational communication and solidarity. In Trnka, S. (ed.). Family issues between gender and generations, pp. 30–43. Luxembourg: European Commission: Employment and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
Cuyvers, P. and Latten, J. (1999). Alleen of samen? Alleen en samen! [Single or together? Single and together!]. The Hague: CBS.
D'Cruz, P. and Bharat, S. (2001). Beyond joint and nuclear: The Indian family revisited. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32: 167–194.Google Scholar
Daguet, F. (1996). Mariage, divorce et union libre [Marriage, divorce and partners]. INSEE Première, 482: 1–4.Google Scholar
Dasen, P. R. (1975). Concrete operational development in three cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6: 156–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasen, P. R. (1993). L'ethnocentrisme de la psychologie [The ethnocentrism of psychology]. In Rey, M. (ed.), Psychologie clinique et interrogations culturelles, pp. 155–174. Paris: L'Hartmattan.Google Scholar
Dasen, P. R., Berry, J. W., and Witkin, H. A. (1979). The use of developmental theories cross-culturally. In Eckensberger, L., Lonner, W., and Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), Cross-cultural contributions to psychology, pp. 69–82. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Raad, B. (1994). An expedition in search of a fifth universal factor: Key issues in the lexical approach. European Journal of Personality, 8: 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekovic, M. Pels, T., and Model, S. (in press). Unity and diversity in child rearing: Family life in a multicultural society.
Delaney, C. (1991). The seed and the soil: Gender and cosmology in Turkish village society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dench, G. (1996). Transforming men. London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Derlega, V. J., Cukur, C. S., Kuang, J. C., and Foryth, D. R. (2002). Interdependent construal of self and the endorsement of conflict resolution strategies in interpersonal, intergroup and international disputesJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33: 610–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dessen, M. A. and Biasoli-Alves, Z. M. M. (2001). O estudo da família como base para a promoção da tolerância [Family studies as a base of promoting the tolerance]. In Biasoli-Alves, Z. M. M. and Fischmann, R. (eds.), Crianças e adolescentes: Construindo uma cultura da tolerância, pp. 183–193. São Paulo: EDUSP.Google Scholar
Dessen, M. A. and Braz, M. P. (2000). Rede social de apoio durante transições familiares decorrentes de nascimento de filhos [Social support network during family transitions to parenthood]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 16: 221–231.Google Scholar
Díaz-Guerrero, R. (1994). La psicología del Mexicano [The psychology of the Mexican]. Mexico: Editorial Trillas.Google Scholar
Doi, T. (1973). The anatomy of dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha International Press.Google Scholar
Donoso, J. (1989). Casa de campo [A house in the country]. Santiago: Editorial Antártica.Google Scholar
Droogers, A. (1988). Brazilian minimal religiosity. In Banck, G. and Koonings, K. (eds.), Social change in contemporary Brazil, pp. 165–175. Amsterdam: CEDLA.Google Scholar
Drouzhynin, V. (1996). Psyhologia semyee [Psychology of the family]. Moscow: KSP.Google Scholar
Duben, A. (1982). The significance of family and kinship in urban Turkey. In Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Sex roles, family and community in Turkey, pp. 73–99. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, G. J. and Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). Family poverty, welfare reform, and child development. Child Development, 71: 188–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durkheim, E. (1888). Introduction a la sociologie de la famille [Introduction to the sociology of the family]. Annales de la Faculté des Lettres de Bordeaux, 10.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. ([1892] 1921). La famille conjugale [The conjugal family]. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'Etranger, 90: 1–14.Google Scholar
Edgell, S. (1980). Middle-class couples. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ekstrand, L. H. and Ekstrand, G. (1987). Children's perceptions of norms and sanctions in two cultures. In Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology, pp. 171–180. Berwyn, PA: Swets North America.Google Scholar
Eldering, L. and Leseman, P. P. M. (eds.). (1999). Effective early education: Cross-cultural perspectives. New York: Falmer.Google Scholar
Elovson, A. C. and Fleming, J. S. (1988). “Rationale for multidimentional self-esteem scale scoring and weighting.” Unpublished manuscript, California State University.
Elzo, J. and Orizo, F. (1999). Jóvenes españoles [Spanish youth]. Madrid: Fundación Santamaria.Google Scholar
Ember, C. R. and Ember, M. (2002). Cultural anthropology, 10th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Encyclopédie Hachette Multimedia 99 (1999). (2 cd-roms). Paris: Hachette.
Encyclopédie Microsoft Encarta en ligne (2005). France (population et société). Retrieved from http://fr.encarta.msn.com.
Engels, F. ([1884] 1942). The origin of the family, private property and the state. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Enriquez, V. (ed.) (1990). Indigenous psychologies. Quezon City: Psychology Research and Training House.Google Scholar
Erkut, S. (1982). Dualism in values toward education of Turkish women. In Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Sex roles, family and community in Turkey, pp. 121–132. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Eurostat (1995). European community household panel. Luxembourg: European Communities.
Eurostat (1996). Demographic statistics. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities.
Eurostat (2001). The social situation in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General for Employment and Social Affairs.
Eurostat (2002a). Eurostat yearbook, 2002. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities.
Eurostat (2002b). First results of the demographic data collection for 2001 in Europe. Statistics in focus: Population and social conditions – Theme 3: Population and living conditions (17/2002). Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://www.europa. eu.int/comm/eurostat.
Fallers, L. A., and Fallers, M. C. (1976). Sex roles in Edremit. In Peristiany, J. G. (ed.), Mediterranean family structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, B. (1999). Family: The making of an idea, and institution, and a controversy in American culture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Fawcett, J. T. (1983). Perceptions of the value of children. In Bulatao, R., Lee, R. D., Hollerbach, P. E., and Bongaarts, J. (eds.), Determinants of fertility in the developing countries, vol. 1, pp. 347–369. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, (1975). The history of the relationship between environment and culture in ethnological thought. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 110: 67–81.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, S. S. and Rosenthal, D. A. (1991). Age expectations of behavioural autonomy in Hong Kong, Australian and American youth: The influence of family variables and adolescents' values. International Journal of Psychology, 26: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feres, J. (2001). La pobreza en Chile en el año 2000 [Poverty in Chile in 2000]. CEPAL, Serie estudios estadísticos y prospectivos, No. 14. Santiago: EPAL/MIDEPLAN.
Fernald, A. (1992). Meaningful melodies in mothers' speech to infants. In Papoušek, H., Jurgens, U., and Papoušek, M. (eds.), Nonverbal vocal communication: Comparative and developmental approaches, pp. 263–281. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferri, E. and Smith, K. (1996). Parenting in the 1990s. Report for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York, England.Google Scholar
Fields, J. (2003). Children's living arrangements and characteristics: March 2002. Current Population Reports, pp. 20–547. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
Finch, J. (1997). Individuality and adaptability in English kinship. In Gullestad, M. and Segalen, M. (eds.), Family and kinship in Europe, pp. 129–145. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Finch, J. and Mason, J. (1993). Negotiating family responsibilities. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisek, G. O. (1982). Psychopathology and the Turkish family: A family systems theory analysis. In Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Sex roles, family and community in Turkey, pp. 295–321. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fisek, G. O. (1993). Life in Turkey. In Adler, L. L. (ed.), International handbook of gender roles, pp. 438–451. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Fisek, G. O. (1995). Gender hierarchy: Is it a useful concept in describing family structure? In Lawick, J. and Sanders, M. (eds.), Family, gender and beyond, pp. 63–72. Heemstede, The Netherlands: LS Books.Google Scholar
Fisek, G. O. and Sunar, D. (2003). Contemporary Turkish families. In Roopnarine, J. and Gielen, U. (eds.), Families in Global Perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Flaquer, Ll. (2000). Family policy and welfare state in southern Europe. Barcelona: Institut de Ciènces Polítiques i Socials (Working Paper 185/00).Google Scholar
Flaquer, Ll. and Soler, J. (1990). Permananecia y cambio en la familia española [Continuity and change in the Spanish family] (Colección Estudios y Encuestas, no 18). Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
Forde, D. (1934). Habitat, economy and society. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Fortes, M. (1978). An anthropologist's apprenticeship. Annual Review of Anthropology, 7: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourastié, J. (1983). Image de la population active en 1975 selon le niveau de qualification [Overview of the active working population according to level of qualification]. Population, 3: 489–498.
Franza, M. (1999). Les mineurs délinquants multirécidivistes: Une nouvelle forme de prise en charge; les Centres Éducatifs Renforcés [Recidivist delinquent minors: A new type of control; Special Educational Centers]. Les Cahiers de l'Actif, 282–283: 101–114.Google Scholar
Freedman, M. (1958). Lineage organization in southeastern China: London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Friedl, E. (1962). Vassilika: A village in modern Greece. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Friedl, E. (1967). The position of women: Appearance and reality. Anthropological Quarterly, 40: 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, V. R., Hinkle, D. E., and Hanna, M. A. (1986). A three-generational study of the development of individual dependence and family interdependence. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 112: 153–171.Google Scholar
Furstenberg, F. F. Jr. (1966). Industrialization and the American family: A look backward. American Sociological Review, 31: 326–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furstenberg, F. F. and Nord, C. W. (1985). Parenting apart: Patterns of childrearing after marital disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47: 893–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, J. K. (1996). The good society: The humane agenda. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Galland, O. (1991). Sociologie de la jeunesse: L'entrée dans la vie. [Sociology of youth: Entrance into life] Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Gari, A. and Kalantzi-Azizi, , A. (1998). The influence of traditional values of education on Greek students' real and ideal self-concepts. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geertz, H. (1961). The Javanese family. A study of kinship and socialization. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press of Glencoe, Inc.Google Scholar
Georgas, J. (1986). Oikogeneiakes axies foititon [Family values of students]. Greek Social Science Review, 61: 3–29.Google Scholar
Georgas, J. (1988). An ecological and social cross-cultural model: The case of Greece. In Berry, J. W., Irvine, S. H., and Hunt, E. B. (eds.), Indigenous cognition: Functioning in cultural context, pp. 105–123. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J. (1989). Changing family values in Greece: From collectivist to individualist. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20: 80–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J. (1991). Intrafamily acculturation of values in Greece. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22: 445–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J. (1993). An ecological-social model for indigenous psychology: The example of Greece. In Kim, U. and Berry, J. W. (eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Theory, method and experience in cultural context, pp. 56–78. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Georgas, J. (1999). Family as a context variable in cross-cultural psychology. In Adamopoulos, J. and Kashima, Y. (eds.), Social psychology and cultural context, pp. 163–175. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Georgas, J. (2000). E psychodynamiki tis oikogeneias stin Ellada: Omoiotites kai diafores me alles hores [The psychodynamics of the family in Greece: Similarities and differences with other countries]. In Kalantzi-Azizi, A. and Besevegis, E. (eds.), Themata epimorphosis evaisthetopoisis stelehon psychikis hygeias paidion kai efevon, pp. 231–251. Athens: Hellenika Grammata.Google Scholar
Georgas, J., Bafiti, T., Papademou, L., and Mylonas, K. (2004a). Families in Greece. In Roopnarine, J. L. and Gielen, U. P. (eds.), Families in global perspective, pp. 207–224. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Georgas, J. and Berry, J. W. (1995). An ecocultural taxonomy for cross-cultural psychology. Cross-Cultural Research, 29: 121–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J., Christakopoulou, S., Poortinga, Y., Goodwin, R., Angleitner, A., and Charalambous, N. (1997). The relationship of family bonds to family structure and function across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28: 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J., Gari, A., and Mylonas, K. (2004b). Relationships with kin in the Greek family [in Greek]. In Mousourou, L. and Strategaki, M. (eds.), The issue of family policy: Theoretical perspectives and empirical investigations, pp. 189–225. Athens: Gutenberg.
Georgas, J., Mylonas, K., Bafiti, T., Christakopoulou, S., Poortinga, Y. H., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Orung, S., Sunar, D., Kwak, K., Ataca, B., Berry, J. W., Charalambous, N., Goodwin, R., Wang, W.-Z., Angleitner, A., Stepanikova, I., Pick, S., Givaudan, M., Zhuravliova-Gionis, I., Konantambigi, R., Gelfand, M. J., Velislava, M., McBride-Chang, M., and Kodiç, Y. (2001). Functional relationships in the nuclear and extended family: A 16 culture study. International Journal of Psychology, 36: 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgas, J., Vijver, F. J. R., and Berry, J. W. (2004c). The Ecocultural Framework, ecosocial indicators and psychological variables in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35: 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergen, H. (1991). The saturated family. Networker, September/October.
Gergen, M. M. and Gergen, K. J. (2000). Qualitative inquiry: Tensions and transformations. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn., pp. 1025–1046. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ghana Statistical Service (1994). Demographic and health survey. Accra, Ghana: DHS/Macro International Inc.
Ghana Statistical Service (1998). Demographic and health survey. Accra, Ghana: DHS/Macro International Inc.
Ghana Statistical Service (2000). 2000 Population Census of Ghana. Accra, Ghana: DHS/Macro International Inc.
Ghuman, P. A. S. (1994). Coping with two cultures: A study of British Asian and Indo-Canadian adolescents. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ghraib, S. A. (1991). Characteristics of agricultural societies in the Arab Gulf states [Arabic text]. Riyadh: The Arabic Center for Security Studies and Training.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gilmore, D. D. (1987). Honor and shame and the unity of the Mediterranean. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Glenn, N. (1993). A plea for objective assessment of the notion of family decline. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55: 542–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalbo, P. (1999). Introducción [Introduction]. In Gonzalbo, P. (ed.), Familia y educación en Iberoamérica, [Family and education in Iberoamerica] pp. 9–20. México: Centro de Estudios Históricos, El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Goode, W. J. (1963). World revolution and family patterns. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goode, W. J. (1964). The family, 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Goodenough, W. H. (1970). Description and comparison in cultural anthropology. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R., Adatia, K., Sinhal, H., Cramer, D., and Ellis, D. (1997). Social support and marital well-being in an Asian community. York, UK: York Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. and Tang, C. S. K. (1996). Chinese personal relationships. In Bond, M. H. (ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology, pp. 294–308. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goody, J. (1983). The oriental, the ancient, and the primitive: Systems of marriage and the family in the pre-industrial societies of Eurasia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gore, M. S. (1968). Urbanization and family change. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.Google Scholar
Gottfried, A. D., Gottfried, A. W., Bathurst, K., and Killian, C. (1999). Maternal and dual-earner employment. In Lamb, M. E. (ed.), Parenting and child development in “nontraditional” families, pp. 15–38. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Government of Botswana and United Nations Development Report (1997). Botswana Human Development Report: Challenges for sustainable human development. Gaborone, Botswana: UNDP.
Government of Georgia and United Nations Development Report (1996). Human development report Georgia 1996. Tbilisi, Georgia: UNDP.
Government of Pakistan (2001, 2002). Economic survey, statistical supplement 2001–2002. Islamabad, Pakistan: Ministry of Finance.
Grotevant, H. D. and Cooper, C. R. (1986). Individuation in family relationships. Human Development, 29: 82–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusfield, J. R. (1967). Tradition and modernity: Misplaced polarities in the study of social change. American Journal of Sociology, 73: 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjiiski, I. (1995). Portret na balgarina [Portrait of the Bulgarian]. Sofia, Bulgaria: BAN.Google Scholar
Hagestad, G. (1986). The family: Women and grandparents as kinkeepers. In Pifer, A. and Bronte, L. (eds.), Our aging society, pp. 141–160. New York: Norton.Google ScholarPubMed
Hammel, E. A. (1972). The zadruga as process. In Laslett, P. and Wall, R. (eds.), Household and family in past time, pp. 335–374. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkness, J. A., Vijver, F. J. R., and Mohler, P. Ph. (2003). Cross-cultural survey methods. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Harrison, L. E. (2000). Why culture matters. In Harrison, L. E. and Huntington, S. P. (eds.), Culture matters: How values shape human progress, pp. xvii–xxxiv. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Haub, C. and Rogers, M. (2002). Kids count. International data sheet. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
Heise, J. (1979). 150 años de evolución institucional [150 years of institutional evolution]. Santiago: Editorial Andrés Bello.Google Scholar
Hemert, D. A., Vijver, F. J. R., Poortinga, Y. H., and Georgas, J. (2002). Structural and functional equivalence of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire within and between countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 33: 1229–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrick, S. and Hendrick, C. (2001). Liking, loving and relating. Pacific Groove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Hentschel, U., Sumbadze, N., and Schoon, I. (2001). Looking at families from a cross-cultural perspective. In Hentschel, U. and Burlatchuk, L. (eds.), Focus Eastern Europe: Psychological and social determinants of behaviour in the transition countries, pp.155–172. Innsbruck: StudienVerlag.Google Scholar
Herbst, P. G. (1952). The measurement of family relationships. Human Relations, 5: 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herk, H. V. and Poortinga, Y. H. (2004). Evidence of method bias in data from six EU Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35: 346–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, L. W. (1987). The value of children to parents and childrearing parents. In Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology, pp. 159–170. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swetz and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Herk, H., Poortinga, Y. H., and Verhallen, T. M. M. (2004). Response styles in rating scales. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35: 346–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, L. W. (1988). Cross-cultural differences in childrearing goals. New Directions for Child Development, 40: 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. ([1980] 2001). Culture's consequences, Comparing values, behaviors institution, and Organization across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Holland, P. W. and Wainer, H. (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hollos, M. and Leis, P. E. (1989). Adolescents in a changing world. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Hortacsu, N. (1989). Targets of communication during adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 12: 253–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hortacsu, N., Gencoz, T., and Oral, A. (1995). Perceived functions of family and friends during childhood, adolescence, and youth: Developmental theories of two Turkish groups. International Journal of Psychology, 30: 591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hortulanus, W. (1983). De ontwikkeling van de welvaartsstaat. In Idenburg, P. (ed.), De nadagen van de verzorgingsstaat [The development of the welfare state]. Amsterdam: Meulenhof.Google Scholar
Houchard, B. (2000). La famille: Une idée neuve en Europe. Paris: Fondation Robert Schuman.Google Scholar
Howard, G. E. (1904). A history of matrimonial institutions. Chicago, IL. (repr. New York, 1964).Google Scholar
Hsu, F. L. K. (1971). Psychosocial homeostasis and jen: Conceptual tools for advancing psychological anthropology. American Anthropologist, 73: 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. A. (ed.). (1994). Chile: A country study. Washington, DC: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. Retrieved from http://www.memory.loc.gov/frd/cs/cltoc.html.Google Scholar
Hundey, I., Magarrey, M., Evans, R., and O'Sullivan, B. (2003). Canadian history: Patterns and transformations. Toronto: Irwin Publishing.Google Scholar
Huntington, E. (1945). Mainsprings of civilization. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hüwelmeier, G. (1997). Kirmesgesellschaften und Männergesangvereine [Amusement societies and mens' chores]. Zeitschrift für Sozialisationsforschung und Erziehungssoziologie, 17: 30–41.Google Scholar
Iachkova, M. (1997). Semeistvoto I podgotovkata za nego [Family and preparation for it]. Sofia, Bulgaria: ASSA-M.Google Scholar
Iglesias de Ussel, J. (1990). La familia y el cambio político en España [The family and political change in Spain]. Revista de Estudios Politicos, 67: 235–259.Google Scholar
Iglesias de Ussel, J. (1995). Trabajo y familia en España [Work and family in Spain]. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 11: 171–198.Google Scholar
Imamoglu, E. O. (1987). An interdependence model of human development. In Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology, pp. 138–145. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swetz and Zeitlinger.
Imamoglu, O. (1991). “Changing intra-family roles in a changing world.” Paper presented at the Seminar on the Individual, the Family and the Society in a Changing World, Istanbul, Turkey.
Imamoglu, O. (1994). A model of gender relations in the Turkish family. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Admininstrative Studies, 8: 165–176.Google Scholar
Indonesia Human Development Report (2001). Towards a new consensus: Democracy and human development in Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: BPS, BAPPENAS, UNDP.
Information Services Department of Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China (2002a). Hong Kong annual report 2001. Hong Kong: HKSAR Government.
Information Services Department of Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China (2002b). Hong Kong 2001 population census summary results. Hong Kong: HKSAR Government.
Inglehart, R. (1991). Changing human goals and values: A proposal for a study of global change. In Pawlik, K. (ed.), Perception and assessment of global environmental conditions and change. Barcelona, Spain: International Social Sciences Council.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Changing values and political styles in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. and Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65: 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingoldsby, B. (1995). Family origin and universality In Ingoldsby, B. and Smith, S. (eds.), Families in multicultural perspective, pp. 83–96. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ingoldsby, B. and Smith, S. (eds.). (1995). Families in multicultural perspective. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Inkeles, A. (1998). One world emerging?: Convergence and divergence in industrial societies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Inoue, T. (1977). “Sekentei” no kozo: Shakaishinrishi heno kokoromi [Structure of “sekentei”: An attempt at the socio-psychological history]. Tokyo: NHK Books.Google Scholar
Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques, République de France (1999). Recensement de la population. Paris: INSEE.
Instituto de la Juventud, Reino de España (2000). Informe juventud en España [Report on youth in Spain]. Madrid: INJUVE.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Reino de España (2002). Cifras INE. Boletín informativo del Instituto Nacional de Estadística, 7/2002 [Figures INE. Informative bulletin of the National Institute of Statistics, 7/2002]. Madrid: INE. Retrieved from http://www.ine.es.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Reino de España (2003). Cifras INE. Boletin Informativo del Instituto Nacional de Estadística, 2/2003 [Figures INE. Informative Bulletin of the National Institute of Statistics, 2/2003]. Madrid: INE. Retrieved from http://www.ine.es.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Republica de Chile (1999). Estadísticas de Chile en el siglo XX [Chile's statistical data during the 20th century]. Santiago: INE. Retrieved from http://www.ine.cl.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Republica de Chile (2003). Censo 2002: Síntesis de resultados [2002 census: A resume]. Santiago: INE. Retrieved from http://www.ine.cl.
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica Geografia e Informática, Estados Unidos Mexicanos (2001). XII censo general de población y vivienda, 2000. Tabulados Básicos. Aguascalientes, Ags., Mexico: INEGI.
Jahoda, G. (1995). The ancestry of a model. Culture and Psychology, 1: 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, H. A. M. (1987). The development of communal living in the Netherlands. In Shangar-Handelman, L. and Palomba, R. (eds.), Alternative patterns of family life in modern societies. Rome: Collana Monografie.Google Scholar
Jayakody, R., Chatters, L. M., and Taylor, R. J. (1993). Family support to single and married African American mothers: The provision of financial, emotional and child care assistance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55: 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. L. (2000). Perspectives on American kinship in the later 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62: 623–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jose, P. E., Huntsinger, C. S., Huntsinger, P. R., and Liaw, F-R. (2000). Parental values and practices relevant to young children's social development in Taiwan and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31: 677–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabloukov, V. A. (1989). Problemy studencheskoi semiee [Problems of student's family]. Moscow: Znanie.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.). (1982a). Sex roles, family and community in Turkey. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1982b). The changing value of children in Turkey. Honolulu, Hawaii: East-West Center, Publ. No. 60-E.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1985). Culture of separateness–culture of relatedness. In Klopp, C. (ed.), 1984 Vision and reality. Papers in Comparative Studies, vol. 4, pp. 91–99. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1986). Status of women in Turkey: Cross-cultural perspectives. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 18: 485–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1990). Family and socialization in cross-cultural perspective: A model of change. In Berman, J. (ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives: Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1989, pp. 135–200. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1996a). Family and human development across cultures: A view from the other side. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (1996b). The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis. European Psychologist, 1: 180–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (2002). A Model of Family Change in cultural context. In W. J. Lonner, D. L. Dinnel, S. A. Hayes, and D. N. Sattler (eds.), Online readings in psychology and culture (Unit 13, Chapter 1). Retrieved from http://www.wwu.edu/culture.
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. and Ataca, B. (2005) Value of children, family and say: A three decade portrait from Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(3): 317–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. and Sunar, D. (1992). Family and socialization in Turkey. In Roopnarine, J. P. and Carter, D. B. (eds.), Parent–child relations in diverse cultural settings: Socialization for instrumental competency, pp. 75–88. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Sunar, D., and Bekman, S. (1988). Comprehensive preschool educational project: Final report (Manuscript Report 209e). Ottawa: International Development Research Center.Google Scholar
Kağıtçıbaşı, C., Sunar, D. and Bekman, S. (2001). Long-term effects of early intervention: Turkish low-income mothers and children. Applied Developmental Psychology, 22: 333–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, E. (1990). The myth of family decline: Understanding families in a world of rapid social change. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Kandiyoti, D. (1974). Some social psychological dimensions of social change in a Turkish village. British Journal of Sociology, 15: 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandiyoti, D. (1977). Sex roles and social change: A comparative appraisal of Turkish women. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 3: 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandiyoti, D. (1982). Urban change and women's roles in Turkey: An overview and evaluation. In Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (ed.), Sex roles, family and community in Turkey, pp. 101–120. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society, 2: 274–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapadia, K. M. (1956). Rural family patterns. Sociological Bulletin, 5: 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasto, H. S. (1982). Perkawinan dan perceraian pada masyarakat Jawa: Suatu studi kasus di desa Harjobinangun, Yogyakarta. [Marriage and divorce in a Javanese community: A case study in Harjobinangum village, Yogyakarta]Jakarta, Indonesia: Pusat Penelitian dan Studi Kependudukan, University of Gadjah Mada.Google Scholar
Kauffman, J.-C. (1993). Sociologie du couple [Sociology of the couple]. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Kazemi-Mortazavi, S. (1978). “Kulturspezifische Aspekte in der Beziehung zwischen Verhalten und raumlicher Umgebung” [Culture-specific aspects of the relationship between behavior and environment]. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Tübingen University, Germany.
Keller, H. (1997). Evolutionary approaches. In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., and Pandey, J. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 1 Theory and method, 2nd edn., pp. 215–255. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Keller, H. (2002). Development as the interface between biology and culture: A conceptualization of early ontogenetic experiences. In Keller, H., Poortinga, Y. H., and Schoelmerich, A. (eds.), Biology, culture and development: Integrating diverse perspectives, pp. 215–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, H., Zach, U., and Abels, M. (2005). The German family. Families in Germany. In Roopnarine, J. and Gielen, U. P. (eds.), Families in global perspective, pp. 242–258. Boston, MA: Allison and Bacon.Google Scholar
Keniston, K. (1985). The myth of family independence. In Henslin, J. M. (ed.), Marriage and family in a changing society, 2nd edn., pp. 27–33. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kermode, J. (1999). Sentiment and survival: Family and friends in late medieval English towns. Journal of Family History, 24: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khatri, A. A. (1970). Personality and mental health of Indians (Hindus) in the context of their changing family organization. In Anthony, E. J. and Koupernik, C. (eds.), The child in his family. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Khatri, A. A. (1975). The adaptive extended family in India today. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37: 633–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiechel, W. (1987, April 13). When the boss wants you to move. Fortune Magazine, pp. 125–128.Google Scholar
Kim, M.-H. (1996). Changing relationships between daughters-in-law and mothers-in-law in urban South Korea. Anthropological Quarterly, 4: 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, U. (1994). Individualism, collectivism, and child development: A Korean perspective. In Greenfield, P. M. and Cocking, R. R. (eds.), Socialization of minority children: Cultural continuities and discontinuities, pp. 227–257. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kim, U. (1995). Individualism and collectivism: Psychological, cultural and ecological analysis. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Kim, U. (2001). Culture, science and indigenous psychologies: An integrated analysis. In Matsumoto, D. (ed.), Handbook of culture and psychology, pp. 51–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, U. and Berry, J. W. (eds.). (1993). Indigenous psychologies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kim, U., Park, Y. S., Kim, M. U., Lee, K. W., and Yu, S. H. (2000). Intergenerational differences and life-satisfaction: Comparative analysis of adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 5: 119–145.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., Butzel, J. S., and Ryan, R. M. (1998, June). Interdependence and well-being: A function of culture and relatedness needs. Paper presented at The International Society for the Study of Personal Relationships, Saratoga Spring, NY.
King, A. Y. C. and Bond, M. H. (1985). The Confucian paradigm of man: A sociological view. In Tseng, W. S. and Wu, D. Y. H. (eds.), Chinese culture and mental health, pp. 29–45. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kiray, M. (1976). The new role of mothers: Changing intra-familial relationships in a small town in Turkey. In Peristiany, J. G. (ed.), Mediterranean family structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitayama, S. and Markus, H. R. (1994). Introduction to cultural psychology and emotion research. In Kitayama, S. and Markus, H. R. (eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence, pp. 1–22. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinger, A. (1990). Integration of population policy and socioeconomic policy. Paper presented at ECE First Informal Working Group Meeting on Integration of Population Policies and Socioeconomic Policies, Varna, Bulgaria.
Kluċkhohn, C. and Murray, H. A. (1950). Personality in nature, society, and culture. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Kochetov, A. I. (1987). Nachala semeinoi zhizni [Beginning of married life]. Minsk, Belarus: Polymia.Google Scholar
Kojuharov, I. (1992). National analysis of the situation of Bulgarian children and families. Sofia, Bulgaria: Bulgarian National Committee for UNICEF.Google Scholar
Kon, I. S. (1988). Rebenok i obschestvo [Child and society]. Moscow: Mir.
Kooy, G. (1992). De ontwikkeling van partnerschap en ouderschap in de modern-westerse wereld [Development of partnership and parenthood in the modern western world]. In Moerland, H. (ed.), De menselijke Maat. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Gouda Quint.Google Scholar
Korea National Statistics Office (2003). Annual statistics. Seoul: Government of Korea.
Kotzamanis, V. and Maratou-Alibrante, L. (1994). Oi demographikes exelixis sti metapolemiki Ellada [Greek demographics after World War II]. Athens: Livanis, Nea Synora.Google Scholar
Koutrelakos, J. (2004). Acculturation of Greek Americans: Change and continuity in cognitive schemas guiding intimate relationships. International Journal of Psychology, 39: 95–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kravets, O. M. (1966). Simeiny pobut i zvuchai ukrainskogo narodou [Family lifestyle and traditions of Ukrainian people]. Kiev, Ukraine: Naukova Dumka.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. (1909). Classificatory systems of relationship. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 39: 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A. (1939). Cultural and natural areas of native North America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kroger, J. (1998). Adolescence as a second separation–individuation process: Critical review of an object relations approach. In Skoe, E. E. A. and Lippe, A. L. (eds.), Personality development in adolescence: A cross-national and life span perspective. Adolescence and society, pp. 172–192. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kwak, K. (2003). Adolescents and their parents: A review of intergenerational family relations for immigrant and non-immigrant families. Human Development, 46: 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwak, K. and Berry, J. W. (2001). Generational differences in acculturation among Asian families in Canada: A comparison of Vietnamese, Korean, and East-Indian groups. International Journal of Psychology, 36: 152–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laing, R. D. (1969). The divided self. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Lambiri-Dimaki, I. (1972). Dowry in modern Greece: An institution at the crossroads between persistence and decline. In Safilios-Rothschild, C. (ed.), Toward a sociology of women, pp. 74–75. Lexington, MA: Xerox College Publishing.Google Scholar
Lappo, G. M. (1984). Stranee i narodee [Countries and peoples]. Moscow: Mysl.Google Scholar
Lasch, C. (1979). The culture of narcissism. New York: Warner.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. (1971). The world we have lost, 2nd edn. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. (1972). Introduction: The history of the family. In Laslett, P. and Wall, R. (eds.), Household and family in past time, pp. 1–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, S. (1981). Chinese familism in an urban-industrial setting: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43: 977–992.Google Scholar
Le Play, F. (1855). Les ouvriers européens [The European Workers]. Études sur les travaux, la vie domestique et la condition morale des populations ouvrières de l'Europe, précédées d'un exposé de la méthode d'observation. Paris: Imprimerie impériale.
Play, F. (1871). L'organisation de la famille [The organisation of the family]. Paris: Tegui.Google Scholar
Lebra, T. S. (1976). Japanese patterns of behavior. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Leburu-Sianga, F. and Molobe, E. (2000). ADEA prospective stocktaking capacity building study: A focus on human resource development for the Ministry of Education. Gaborone, Botswana: ADEA Publications.Google Scholar
LeGoff, J. (1985). L'imaginaire médiéval. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Leñero, O. L. (1982). El niño y la familia [The child and the family]. Ciudad de México: SCPEIN.Google Scholar
Lesthaeghe, R. (1980). On the social control of human reproduction. Population and Development Review, 6: 527–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesthaeghe, R. and Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change. Population and Development Review, 14(1): 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letamo, G. and Majelantle, R. G. (2001). Factors influencing low birth weight and prematurity in Botswana. Journal of Bioscience, 33: 391–403.Google ScholarPubMed
Lévi-Strauss, C. ([1949] 1969). Les structures élémentaires de la parenté. [The elementary structures of kinship]. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, C. (1969). The elementary structures of kinship. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
Levinson, D. and Malone, M. J. (1980). Toward explaining human culture. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.Google Scholar
Levitt, M. J., Weber, R. A., and Guacci, N. (1993). Convoys of social support: An intergenerational analysis. Psychology and Aging, 8: 323–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, M. (1949). The family revolution in modern China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. (2000). A man's place in the home: Fathers and families in the UK. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Liljestrom, R. (2002). The strongest bond on trial. In Liljestrom, and Ozdalga, (eds.), Autonomy and dependence in the family, pp. 59–79. Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute.Google Scholar
Lin, C-Y. C. and Fu, V. R. (1990). A comparison of child-rearing practices among Chinese, immigrant Chinese, and Caucasian-American parents. Child Development, 61: 429–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, R. (1936). The study of man. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Linton, R. (1945). The cultural background of personality. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Lomax, A. and Berkowitz, W. (1972). The evolutionary taxonomy of culture. Science, 177: 228–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovell-Troy, L. (1980). Clan structure and economic activity: The case of Greeks in small business enterprise. In Cummings, S. (ed.), Self-help in urban America, pp. 58–85. Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.Google Scholar
Bolles, Lynn A. (1996). Sister Jamaica: A study of women, work, and households in Kingston. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E. M. and Jacklin, C. N. (1975). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, A. (1978). The origins of English individualism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, A., (1986). Marriage and love in England: Modes of reproduction 1300–1840. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Magnis-Suseno, F. (1984). Etika Jawa. Sebuah Analisis Falsafi tentang Kebijaksanaan Hidup Jawa. [Javanese ethics. A philosophical analysis of Javanese living wisdom.] Jakarta, Indonesia: Penerbit PT Gramedia.Google Scholar
Main reasons for divorce [Arabic text]. (2000, December 30). Al-Youm. A daily newspaper, p. 583. Algiers, Algeria.
Makaveeva, L. (1991). Balgarskoto semistvo [The Bulgarian family]. Sofia, Bulgaria: Balgarska Akademia na Naukite, Etnografski Institut s Muzei.Google Scholar
Makgoba, M. W. (1997). The Makgoba affair: A reflection on transformation. Pretoria, South Africa: Vivla Publishers and Book Sellers.Google Scholar
Makgoba, M. W. and Seepe, S. (2004). Knowledge and identity: An African vision of higher education transformation. In Seepe, S. (ed.), Towards an African identity of higher education, pp. 13–58. Pretoria, South Africa: Vista University and Skotaville Media.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1927). Sex and repression in savage society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mandela, N. (1994, May 11). A time for healing the wounds. The Star.
Mansfield, P. and Collard, J. (1988). The beginning of the rest of your life?Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maratou-Alibrante, L. (1995). H oikogenia stin Ellada: Oikogeniaka protypa kai syzigikes praktikes [Family in Greece: Family norms and spouse functions]. Athens: National Social Sciences Center.Google Scholar
Maratou-Alibrante, L. (1999). Diageneakes sxeseis sti synchrone epoche [Intergenerational relationships in modern epoch]. Greek Review of Social Research, 4976: 98–99.Google Scholar
Marks, N. F. and McLanahan, S. S. (1993). Gender, family structure, and social support among parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55: 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. ([1867] 1936). Capital. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D. (1999). Culture and self: An empirical assessment of Markus and Kitayama's theory of independent and interdependent self-construals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2: 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbeki, T. (2002). Presidential speech at the graveyard of Sarah Bartman. Pretoria, South Africa: Government Press.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. E. and Terraciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88: 547–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlone, F., Park, A., and Smith, K. (1998). Families and kinship. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. J. (1995). The new Germany: Social, political and cultural challenges of unification. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
McLanahan, S. and Teitler, J. (1999). The consequences of father absence. In Lamb, M. E. (ed.), Parenting and child development in “nontraditional” families, pp. 83–102. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meeker, M. (1976). Meaning and society in the Near East: Examples from the Black Sea Turks and the Levantine Arabs (Parts I and II). International Journal of Middle East Studies, 7: 243–270 and 383–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendras, H. (1997). L'Europe des Européens: Sociologie de l'Europe occidentale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Menon, T., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C., and Hong, Y. (2000). Culture and the construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76: 701–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mermet, J. (1999). Francoscopie: Comment vivent les Français? [Francoscopie: How do the French live?] Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Metz, C. H. (1993). Algeria: A country study. Washington, DC: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress.Google Scholar
Milardo, R. M. (1997). Social networks and marital relationships. In Duck, S. (ed.), Handbook of personal relationships, pp. 505–522, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Millar, J. and Warman, A. (1996). Family obligations in Europe. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.Google Scholar
Miller, J. G. (1997). Theoretical issues in cultural psychology. In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., and Pandey, J. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 1. Theory and method, 2nd edn., pp. 85–128. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deportes, Reino de España (2000). Sistema educativo español [Spanish educational system]. Madrid: MECD. Retrieved from http://www.mecd.es.
Mishra, R. C., Sinha, D., and Berry, J. W. (1996a). Cognitive functioning of tribal groups in Bihar. In Grad, H., Blanco, A., and Georgas, J. (eds.), Key issues in cross-cultural psychology, pp. 89–101. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Mishra, R. C., Sinha, D. and Berry, J. W. (1996b). Ecology, acculturation and psychological adaptation: A study of Advasi in Bihar. Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mitteraurer, M. and Seider, R. (1982). The European family: Patriarchy to partnership from the middle ages to the present. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mivanyi, Y. J. (1988). “The extended family system and learning styles of Junior Secondary School (JSS) III Adamawa and Taraba States of Nigeria.” Preliminary investigation to a doctoral thesis, University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria.
Mivanyi, Y. J. (2002). National census on water rehabilitations and supplyKano State: A report.Nigeria.Google Scholar
Modood, T., Berthoud, R., Lakey, J., Nazroo, J., Smith, P., Virdee, S., and Beishon, S. (1997). Ethnic minorities in Britain: Diversity and disadvantage. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Mogey, J. (1991). Families: Intergenerational and generational connections–conceptual approaches to kinship and culture. Marriage and Family Review, 16: 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montecino, S. (1993). Madres y huachos. Alegorías del mestizaje chileno [Mothers and bastards. Allegories of Chilean half-caste]. Santiago: Editorial Cuarto Propio-Ediciones CEDEM.Google Scholar
Moore, C. A. (1974). Introduction: The humanistic Chinese mind. In Moore, C. A. (ed.), The Chinese mind: Essentials of Chinese philosophy and culture, pp. 1–10. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Moran, E. (1982). Human adaptability: An introduction to ecological anthropology. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Moran, E. (1990). The ecosystem approach in anthropology. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. H. (1870). Systems of consanguinity and affinity of the human family. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortazavi, S. (1996). Iranian school spaces [In Farsi]. Tehran: Iranian Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Mortazavi, S. (2000). Attitudes of feminine rural high-school pupils towards immigration [In Farsi]. Tehran: Pajuheschnameh University of Shahid Beheshti.Google Scholar
Mortazavi, S. and Karimi, E. (1992). Cultural dimensions of paternalistic behavior: A cross-cultural research in 5 countries. In Iwawaki, S., Kashima, Y. and Leung, K. (eds.), Innovations in cross-cultural psychology, pp. 147–151. Amsterdam: Swetz & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Mousourou, L. M. (1985). Oikogeneia kai paidi stin Athena [Family and child in Athens]. Athens: Estia.Google Scholar
Mthembu, T. (2004). Creating a niche in internationalization for (South) African higher education institutions. In Seepe, S. (ed.), Towards an African identity of higher education, pp. 77–82. Pretoria, South Africa: Vista University and Skotaville Media.Google Scholar
Muncie, J. and Sapsford, R. (1995). Issues in the study of “the family.” In Muncie, J., Wetherell, M., Dallos, R., and Cochrane, A. (eds.). Understanding the family, pp. 7–37. London: SageGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, M. and Reyes, E. (1997). Una mirada al interior de la familia [A glance inside the family]. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.Google Scholar
Munroe, R. L. and Munroe, R. H. (1997). A comparative anthropological perspective. In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., and Pandey, J. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 1. Theory and method, 2nd edn., pp. 171–213. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Muramoto, Y. (2003). An indirect self-enhancement in relationship among Japanese. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34: 552–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muramoto, Y. and Yamaguchi, S. (2003). “Jikohige” ga kietu toki: Naishudan no kankeisei ni oujita jiko to shudan no seikou no katarikata [When “self-effacement” disappears: Narratives of personal and ingroup successes depending on an ingroup relationship]. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 43: 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdock, G. P. (1949). Social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Murdock, P. M. (1957). World ethnographic sample. American Anthropologist, 59: 664–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdock, G. P. (1967): Ethnographic Atlas. Pittsburgh, PA: HRAF Press.Google Scholar
Murdock, G. P. (1969). Correlations of exploitative and settlement patterns. In Damas, D. (ed.), Contributions to anthropology: Ecological essays (Bulletin no. 230, Anthropological Series no. 86). Ottawa: National Museum of Canada.Google Scholar
Murdock, G. P. (1975). Outline of cultural materials. New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files.Google Scholar
Murray, M. (1994). The revolution deferred: The painful birth of post-apartheid South Africa. London: City Press.Google Scholar
Mylona, L. (1986). Cypriot woman. Nicosia, Cyprus.Google Scholar
Nakane, C. (1970). Japanese society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Naroll, R., Michik, G. L., and Naroll, F. (1974). Hologeistic theory testing. In Jurgensen, J. G. (ed.), Comparative studies by Harold E. Driver and essays in his honor. New Haven, CT: HRAN.Google Scholar
Neder, G. (1998). Ajustando o foco das lentes: Um novo olhar sobre a organizaCão das famílias no Brasil [Adjusting the focal point: A new glance at the family organization in Brazil]. In Kaloustian, S. M. (ed.), Família brasileira: A base de tudo, pp. 26–46. São Paulo and Brasilia: Cortez and UNICEF.Google Scholar
Gezinsraad, Nederlandse (2001). Gezin: Beeld en werkelijkheid [Family: Image and reality]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Nederlandse Gezinsraad.Google Scholar
Needham, R. (1974). Remarks and inventions: Skeptical essays about kinship. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Nhlapo, T. (1992). Marriage and divorce in Swazi law and custom. Mbabane, Swaziland: Swazi Press.Google Scholar
Nimkoff, M. F. and Middleton, R. (1960). Types of family and types of economy. American Journal of Sociology, 66: 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nogueira, A. H. (2001). “Padrões culturais e normas para comportamentos de lideranca: Um estudo comparativo entre empregados de empresas de previdência privada do Brasil e dos EUA” [Cultural patterns and norms for leadership behaviors: A comparative study among employees of private social security agencies in Brazil and the US]. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Brasilia, Brazil.
Norval, A. L. (2001). “Deconstructing apartheid.” Unpublished paper, University of Essex, UK.
Nsamenang, B. (1992). Human development in cultural context. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Nukunya, G. K. (1969). Kinship and marriage among the Anlo Ewe-speaking people of Ghana (London School of Economics, Monographs on Social Anthropology, 37). London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Nukunya, G. K. (1992). Tradition and change in Ghana: An introduction to sociology. Accra, Ghana: Ghana Universities Press.Google Scholar
Nurhaena (1995). “Keterlibatan Ayah dalam Pengasuhan Bayi dan Anak Kecil.” [Father's involvement in rearing babies and toddlers]. Unpublished research report, Faculty of psychology, University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
Oboladze, U. (1990). Women's issue in writings of Ilia Chavchavadze. Tbilisi, Georgia: Tbilisi State University Publishing House.Google Scholar
Office Nationale des Statistiques, République Algérienne Démocratique et Populaire (2005). L'annuaire statistique de l'Algérie No 20: Résultats 1999–2001. Algiers: ONS.
Office of National Statistics, UK (2000). Social trends 2000. London: The Stationery Office.
Office of National Statistics, UK (2001). Britain 2001. London: The Stationery Office.
Office of National Statistics, UK (2002). UK 2002, Official yearbook of the UK. London: The Stationery Office.
Olson, D. H., McCubbin, H. I., Barnes, H. L., Muxen, M. J., Larsen, A. S., and Wilson, M. A. (1989). Families: What makes them work, updated edn. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Olson, E. A. (1982). Duofocal family structure and an alternative model of husband–wife relationship. In Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Sex roles, family and community in Turkey, pp. 33–72. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Omolara, P. A. (1995). “A study of the effects of parental separation on the academic performance and personality traits of children.” Unpublished paper, Department of Education (Technical), Kaduna Polytechnic, Kaduna, Nigeria.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Program for International Students Assessment (2004). Messages from PISA 2000. Retrieved from http://www.pisa.oecd.org.
Orlove, B. S. (1980). Ecological anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9: 235–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orrego-Luco, L. (1983). Casa grande [Great house]. Santiago: Editorial Andrés Bello.Google Scholar
Owen, D. W. (1996). The Other–Asians: The salad bowl. In Peach, C. (ed.), Ethnicity in the 1991 Census. London: HMSOGoogle Scholar
Owens, R. (1971). Industrialization and the Indian joint family. Ethnology, 10: 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozgur, S. and Sunar, D. (1982). Social psychological patterns of homicide in Turkey: A comparison of male and female convicted murders. In Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (ed.), Sex roles, family and community in Turkey, pp. 349–381. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Panayotopoulos, B. (1985). Dimension et composition de la famille péloponnélsienne aux environs de 1700: Quelques remarques [Dimensions and Composition of the Peloponnesian family around 1700: some comments]. In Piault, C. (ed.), Famillies et biens en Gréce et à Chypre, pp. 29–44. Paris: Editions L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Papademou, L. (1999). Koinonike kai psychologike analyse tis oikogeneias [Social and psychological analysis of the family]. Psychologia, 6: 165–173.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, T. (1998). Greek family policy from a comparative perspective. In Drew, E., Emerek, R., and Mahon, E. (eds.), Women, work and the family in Europe, pp. 47–57. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, A., Curtice, J., Thomson, K., Jarvis, L., and Bromley, C. (2001). British social attitudes: The 18th report. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Y. S. and Kim, U., (2004). Parent–child relationship in Korea: Indigenous psychological analysis of self-concept and family role. Seoul: Kyoyook Kwahaksa.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1943). The kinship system of the contemporary United States. American Anthropologist, 45: 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T. (1949). The social structure of the family. In Anshen, R. N. (ed.), The family: Its functions and destiny, pp. 33–58. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1965). The normal American family. In Farber, S. M. (ed.), Man and civilization: The family's search for survival, pp. 34–36. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Pasternak, B. E., Ember, C. R., and Ember, M. (1976). On the conditions favoring extended family households. Journal of Anthropological Research, 32: 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternak, B. E., Ember, C. R. and Ember, M. (1997). Sex, gender and kinship: A cross-cultural perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Pavliouk, S. P., Goryn, G. U., and Kyrchiv, R. F. (1997). Ukrainske narodoznavstvo [Ukrainian folklore]. Lviv, Ukraine: Fenix.Google Scholar
Pearson, V. M. and Stephan, W. G. (1998). Preferences for styles of negotiation: A comparison of Brasil and the US. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22: 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peletz, M. (1995). Kinship studies in late twentieth-century anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24: 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelto, P. (1968). The difference between “tight” and “loose” societies. Transaction, 5: 37–40.Google Scholar
Peristiany, J. G. (1965). Honor and shame: The values of Mediterranean society. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Peters, J. (1990). Cultural variations: Past and present. In Baker, M. (ed.), Families: Changing trends in Canada, 2nd edn., pp. 166–191. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
Phalet, K. and Schönpflug, U. (2001). Intergenerational transmission of collectivism and achievement values in two acculturation contexts: The case of Turkish families in Germany and Turkish and Moroccan families in the Netherlands. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32: 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pithon, G., Ho Can Sung, A., and Brochain, E. (2003, April). “Les parents des familles vulnérables et traditionnelles, vivant en France métropolitaine et en Martinique, préconisent-ils les mêmes modèles de bien traitance que ceux véhiculés par un programme en éducation parentale?” [Is it recommended that parents of vulnerable families in metropolitan France and Martinique use the same treatment models as those delivered by a programme of parental education?]. Paper presented at the International Congress AIFREF- EUSARF “In the best interests of the child: Cross-cultural perspectives”, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Pithon, G., Terrisse, B., Gordon, D., Prévôt, O., and Vallerand, S. (2004). La résolution de problèmes éducatifs: Entraînement interactif à la communication parents–enfants au moyen d'un programme de formation sur cédérom [The resolution of educational problems: Developing interactive communication between parents and children using a CD Rom teaching program]. In Palacio-Quintin, E., Bouchard, J. M., and Terrisse, B. (eds.), Questions d'éducation familliale, pp. 443–454. Brussels: Laval.Google Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H. and Vijver, F. J. R. (2000). How different are personality traits cross-culturally and how are they different? Contemporary Psychology, 45: 89–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poortinga, Y. H., and Vijver, F. J. R. van de (2004). Culture and cognition: Performance differences and invariant structures. In Sternberg, R. J. and Grigorenko, E. (eds.), Culture and competence: Context of life success, pp. 139–162. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popenoe, D. (1988). Disturbing the nest: Family change and decline in modern societies. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Popenoe, D. (1993). American family decline, 1960–1990: A review and appraisal. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55: 527–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popular Bank of Cyprus (2002). Kyprovarometro [Cyprusbarometer]. Nicosia, Cyprus: PBC.
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (2002a). Informe sobre desarrollo humano 2002 [2002 human development report]. Ciudad de México: Ediciones Mundi-Prensa.
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (2002b). Nosotros los chilenos: Un desafío cultural. Informe de desarrollo humano en Chile en 2002 [We, the Chileans: A cultural challenge. 2002 human development report for Chile]. Santiago: PNUD.
Psychogios, D. (1987). Prikes, fori, stafida kai psomi [Dowries, taxes, raisin and bread]. Athens, Greece: National Social Sciences Center.Google Scholar
Razi, Z. (1993). The myth of the immutable English family. Past and Present: A Journal of Historical Studies, 140: 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reca, I., Pérez, E., and Espíndola, E. (1996). Familias y hogares en situaciones críticas en Chile según censo 1992 [Families and households under critical conditions in Chile, according to 1992 census]. Documentos de Trabajo No. 46. Santiago: Servicio Nacional de la Mujer.
Reitz, J. G. (2001). Immigrant success in the knowledge economy: Institutional change and the immigrant experience in Canada, 1970–1995. Journal of Social Issues, 5: 579–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Religion Statistics Geography (2002). Religion by location index. Retrieved September, 2002, from http://adherents.com.
Requena, F. (1994). Redes de amistad, felicidad y familia [Networks of friendship, happiness, and family]. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 66: 73–89.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, D. (1997). O povo brasileiro: A formação e sentido do Brasil [Brazilian people: The formation and meaning of Brazil]. São Paulo, Brazil: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, R. M., Sabóia, A. L., Branco, H. C., and Bregman, S. (1998). Estrutura familiar, trabalho e renda [Family structure, work, and income]. In Kaloustian, S. M. (ed.), Família brasileira: a base de tudo, pp. 135–158. São Paulo, Brazil: Cortez and UNICEF.Google Scholar
Richard, L. L. (1980). Algeria. World Bibliographical Series, vol. 19. Oxford: Clio Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. E. L., Richards, L. N., and Bengtson, V. L. (1991). Intergenerational solidarity in families: Untangling the ties that bind. Marriage and Family Review, 16: 11–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G. (1997). Families, generations, and self. Ethos, 25: 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosquera, Rodriguez P. M., Manstead, A. S. R., and Fischer, A. H. (2002). Honor in the Mediterranean and northern Europe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33: 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanelli, G. (1997). Famílias de classes populares: Socialização e identidade masculina [Families of working classes: Socialization and masculine identity]. Cadernos de Pesquisa-NEP, 1–2: 25–34.
Romanelli, G. (1998). O relacionamento entre pais e filhos em famílias de camadas médias [Parent–child relationships in middle-class families]. Cadernos de Psicologia e Educação Paidéia, 8: 123–136.Google Scholar
Romanelli, G. (2000). Autoridade e poder na família [Authority and power in the family]. In Carvalho, M. C. B. (ed.), A família contemporânea em debate, pp. 73–88. São Paulo, Brazil: EDUC/Cortez.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. S. (1993). Intergenerational relations: Gender, norms, and behavior. In Bengtson, V. L. and Achenbaum, W. A. (eds.), The changing contract across generations, pp. 191–212. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roussel, L. and Bourguignon, O. (1976). La famille après le marriage des enfants [The family after marriage of the children] (Travaux et documents, no. 78). Paris: INED/PUF.Google Scholar
Ruble, D. N., Costanzo, P. R., and Oliveri, M. E. (1992). The social psychology of mental health. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55: 68–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. M. and Lynch, J. H. (1989). Emotional autonomy versus detachment: Revisiting the vicissitudes of adolescence and young adulthood. Child Development, 60: 340–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J., and Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14: 226–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saal, C. D. (1987). Alternative forms of living and housing. In Shangar-Handelman, L. and Palomba, R. (eds.), Alternative patterns of family life in modern societies. Rome: Collana Monografie.Google Scholar
Sachs, A. (1992). There's a constitution about. South Africa International, 22: 187–8.Google Scholar
Safilios-Rothschild, K. (1967). A comparison of power structure and marital satisfaction in urban Greek and French families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29: 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safilios-Rothschild, K. (1971). A cross-cultural examination of women's marital, educational and occupational options. Acta Sociologica, 14: 96–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salazar, G. (1990). Ser niño “huacho” en la historia de Chile (siglo XIX) [Being a bastard child in the history of Chile (nineteenth century)]. In Proposiciones, No. 19: Chile. Historia y “bajo pueblo,” pp. 55–83. Santiago: SUR Ediciones.
Salinas, R. (1994). Uniones ilegítimas y desuniones legítimas. El matrimonio y la formación de la pareja en Chile colonial [Illegitimate unions and legitimate splits. Marriage and partnership in colonial Chile]. In Gonzalbo, P. and Rabell, C. (eds.), La familia en el mundo iberoamericano, pp. 173–192. Ciudad de México: National Autonomous University of Mexico.Google Scholar
Sam, D. L. and Berry, J. W. (2006), (eds.) Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samara, E. M. (1992). Novas imagens da família “à brasileira” [New images of the Brazilian family]. Psicologia-USP, 3: 59–66.Google Scholar
Santos, N. R. (1998). Governo corta na saúde e educação para pagar uma dívida impagável [Government cuts on health and education to pay an invaluable debt]. Jornal da Ciência, 401: 7–8.Google Scholar
Sarvestani, K. K. (1998). The land of Mehr and Mah. Shiraz, Iran: Daneshnameh Pars Publishing.Google Scholar
Sass, J. and Ashford, L. (2002). Women of our world. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
Schmitt, E. (2001, May 15). For the first time, nuclear families drop below 25% of households. New York Times, 1.
Schneider, D. M. (1968). American kinship: A cultural account. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in twenty countries. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 25, pp. 1–65. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1994a). Are there universal aspects in the structure and content of human values?Journal of Social Issues, 50: 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1994b). Beyond individualism-collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., Choi, S.-C., and Yoon, G. (eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications, pp. 85–119. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Seepe, S. (2004). Speaking truth to power. Pretoria, South Africa: Vista University and Skotaville Media.Google Scholar
Segalen, M. (1986). Historical anthropology of the family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segalen, M. (1996). Sociologie de la famille [Sociology of the family] (4th edn. 2000). Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Segall, M. H., Dasen, P. R., Berry, J. W., and Poortinga, Y. H. (1999). Human behavior in global perspective: An introduction to cross-cultural psychology, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Serrano, S. (1999). Quién quiere la educación? Estado y familia en Chile a mediados del siglo XIX [Who wants education? State and family in Chile by the middle of the twientieth century]. In Gonzalbo, P. (ed.), Familia y educación en Iberoamérica, pp.153–171. Ciudad de México: Centro de Estudios Históricos, El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Servicio Nacional de la Mujer, Republica de Chile (2001). Mujeres chilenas: Estadísticas para un nuevo siglo [Chilean women: Statistical data for a new century]. Santiago: SERNAM.
Setiloane, G. M. (1975). The ideal of God among the Sotho-Tswana. Leiden, The Netherlands: Balkema.Google Scholar
Seymour, D. C. (1999). Women, family, and child care in India: A world in transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shablia, O. (1995). Sotsiologia, ikonomika, geografia Ukrainee [Sociology, economy and geography of Ukraine]. Lviv, Ukraine: Zvit.Google Scholar
Shah, A. M. (1968). Changes in the Indian family. Economic and Political Weekly, 3: 127–135.Google Scholar
Shah, A. M. (1996). Is the joint household disintegrating? Economic and Political Weekly, 31: 537–542.Google Scholar
Shojaii, M. (2004). Iranian women are still waiting and hopeful [in Farsi]. Journal of Zanan, 110: 16–22.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A. and Sullivan, M. A. (1993). Cultural psychology: Who needs it?Annual Review of Psychology, 44: 497–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silitshena, P. M. A. (1982). The regrouping policy: The north-east district of Botswana. Ibadan, Nigeria: Heineman.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. and Bengtson, V. L. (1997). Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child–parent relationships in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 2: 429–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20: 580–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singelis, T. M. and Brown, W. P. (1995). Culture, self, and collectivist communication: Linking culture to individual behavior. Human Communication Research, 21: 354–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singelis, T. M. and Sharkey, W. F. (1995). Culture, self-construal, and embarrassability. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26: 622–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., and Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29: 240–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, D. (1988). The family scenario in a developing country and its implications for mental health: The case of India. In Dasen, P. R., Berry, J. W., and Sartorius, N. (eds.), Health and cross-cultural psychology: Toward applications, pp. 48–70. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sinha, D. (1991). Rise in the population of the elderly, familial changes and their psychosocial implications: The scenario of the developing countries. International Journal of Psychology, 26: 633–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, D. (1997). Indigenizing psychology. In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., and Pandey, J. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 1. Theory and method, 2nd edn., pp. 129–169. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Sinha, S. R. (1985). Maternal strategies for regulating children's behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16: 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skolnick, A. (1993). Change of heart: Family dynamics in historical perspective. In Cowan, P. A., Field, D., Hansen, D. A., Skolnick, A., and Swanson, G. E., (eds.), Family, self, and society, pp. 43–68. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slaughter, D. T. (ed.) (1988). Black children and poverty: A developmental perspective. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Brass.Google Scholar
Smith, S. (1995). Family theory and multicultural family studies. In Ingoldsby, B. and Smith, S. (eds.), Families in multicultural perspective, pp. 5–35. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B. and Bond, M. H. (1999). Social psychology across cultures, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., Ayestaran. S., Jesuíno, J. C., and Ferdman, B. M. (in press). Cultural values and decision behaviour in work organisations. In Ros, M. and Gouveia, V. V. (eds.), Social psychology of human values: Theoretical, methodological, and applied developments. La Coruña, Spain: Biblioteca Nueva.
Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Nederland (1995). Tijdopnamen [Time recordings]. The Hague, The Netherlands: SCP.
Song, M. (1997). Children's labour in ethnic family businesses: The case of Chinese take-away businesses in Britain. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 20: 690–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spasovska, L. (1985a). Pokolenia i semeistvo (sotsialni aspecti) [Generations and family (social aspects)]. Sofia, Bulgaria: Otechestven Front.Google Scholar
Spasovska, L. (1985b). Semeistvoto: Sociologicheski ocherk [The family: Sociological depiction]. Sofia, Bulgaria: BAN.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1876). Principles of sociology, vol. 1. London: Appleton.Google Scholar
Sperry, L. and Carlson, J. (1991). Marital therapy: Integrating theory and technique. Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Spielmann, K. A. and Eder, J. F. (1994). Hunters and farmers: Then and now. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23: 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, J. (1993). Good riddance to “the family”: A response to David Popenoe. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55: 545–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standley, K. (1993). Family law. Houndmills and London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, J. (1989). The role of Turkish secular law in changing the lives of rural Muslim women, 1950–1970. Law and Society Review, 23: 497–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State Department of Statistics for Georgia (2000). Statistical Yearbook of Georgia – 2000. Tbilisi, Georgia: SDS.
State Department of Statistics for Georgia (2001). Households in Georgia – 2000. Tbilisi, Georgia: SDS.
State Institute of Statistics, Republic of Turkey (1991). Statistical Indicators, 1923–90. Ankara, Turkey: SIS. Retrieved from http://www.die.gov.tr.
State Institute of Statistics, Republic of Turkey (2001). Women's indicators and statistics. Ankara, Turkey: SIS. Retrieved from http://www.die.gov.tr.
Statistical Service of the Republic of Cyprus (2003). Demographic report 2000. Nicosia, Cyprus: Government Printing Office.
Statistisches Bundesamt, Bundesrepublik Deutschland (1999). Datenreport. Zahlen und Fakten über die Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Schriftenreihe der Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Band 365) [Data report. Numbers and facts about the Federal Republic of Germany (Paper series of the Federal Office for Political Education, vol. 365)]. Bonn: Germany.
Steil, J. M. (2001). Family forms and member well-being: A research agenda for the decade of behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25: 344–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, L. and Silverberg, S. B. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development, 57: 841–851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steward, J. (1955). The concept and method of cultural ecology: Theory of culture change. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. M., Bond, M. H., Chan, W.Zaman, R. M., Dar, R., and Anwar, M.(2003). Autonomy from parents and psychological adjustment in an interdependent culture. Psychology in developing societies, 15: 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, S. M., Bond, M. H., Deeds, O., and Chung, S. F. (1999). Intergenerational patterns of values and autonomy expectations in cultures of relatedness and separateness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30: 575–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, S. M., Bond, M. H., Ho, L. M., Zaman, R. M., Dar, R., and Anwar, M. (2000). Perceptions of parents and adolescent outcomes in Pakistan. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18: 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, S. M., Bond, M. H., Zaman, R. M., McBride-Chang, C., Rao, N., and Fielding, R. (1999). Functional parenting in Pakistan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23: 747–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, S. M., Zaman, R. M., and Dar, R. (in press). Pakistani mothers perceptions of autonomy as a psychological need. Psychology and Developing Societies.
Sugareva, M. (1996). Balgarskoto semeistvo v prehoda kam pazarna ikonomika [The Bulgarian family in the transition period]. Sofia, Bulgaria: Fondation “Svobodna Initsiativa.”Google Scholar
Sumbadze, N. (1999). Social web: Friendships of adult men and women. Leiden, The Netherlands: DSWO Press.Google Scholar
Sunar, D. (1988). Attitudes of Turkish students toward elderly relatives. Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 3: 41–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunar, D. (2002). Change and continuity in the Turkish middle-class family. In Ozdalga, E. and Liljestrom, R. (eds.), Autonomy and dependence in family: Turkey and Sweden in critical perspective, pp. 217–237. Istanbul, Turkey: Swedish Research Institute.Google Scholar
Sunar, D. and Fisek, G. (2004). Contemporary Turkish families. In Gielen, U. and Roopnarine, J. (eds.), Families in global perspective. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Swaan, A. (1988). In care of the state: Health care, education and welfare in Europe and the USA in the modern era. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Swatridge, L. A., Wright, I. A., Hildebrand, W., Oliver, C. A., and Pyzer, G. D. (2000). Canada: Exploring new directions, 4th edn. Ottawa: Fitzhenry and Whiteside Ltd.Google Scholar
Sybstelniy, O. (1991). Ukraina istoria [History of Ukraine]. Kiev, Ukraine: Lubid.Google Scholar
Takano, Y. and Osaka, E. (1999). An unsupported common view: Comparing Japan and the US on individualism/collectivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2: 311–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmon-Garber, Y. (1970). Social change and kinship ties. In Hill, R. and Konig, R. (eds.), Families in east and west: Socialization process and kinship, pp. 504–524. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. D. and Wang, M. C. (eds.) (2000). Resilience across contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Telbizov, K. (1946). Zemedelskoto semeistvo [The agrarian family]. Varna, Bulgaria: Fond Nauchni Izledrania.Google Scholar
Ten Berge, J. M. F. (1986). Rotatie naar perfecte congruentie en de Multipele Groep Methode [Rotation to pefect congruence and the Multiple Group Method]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 41: 218–225.Google Scholar
Thiersch, F. (1833). De l'état actuel de la Grece [On the contemporary situation of Greece]. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Thorton, A. (1984). Modernization and family change. In Social Change and Family Policies. Proceedings of the twentieth International CFR Seminar. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
Thorton, A. and Fricke, T. E. (1987). Social change and the family: Comparative perspectives from the west. Sociological Forum, 2: 746–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timur, S. (1972). Türkiye'de Aile Yapisi [Family structure in Turkey]. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayinlari.
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20: 410–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Kruger, A., and Ratner, H. (1993). Culture learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16: 495–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J. and Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, pp. 19–136. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Torres, C. V. (1999). “Leadership style norms among Americans and Brazilians: Assessing differences using Jackson's return potential model.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, San Diego, CA, USA.
Torres, C. V. and Dessen, M. A. (2004). Brazilian culture, family, and its ethnic-cultural variety. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Triandis, H. C. (1987). Collectivism vs. individualism: A reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural psychology. In Bagley, C. and Verma, G. K. (eds.), Personality, cognition, and values: Cross-cultural perspectives on childhood and adolescence, pp. 2–42. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: West view.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., and Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-group relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C. and Vassiliou, V. (1972). An analysis of subjective culture. In Triandis, H. C. (ed.), The analysis of subjective culture, pp. 299–335. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Troadec, B. (2001). Le modèle écoculturel: Un cadre pour la psychologie culturelle comparative [The ecocultural model: A framework for comparative cultural psychology]. International Journal of Psychology, 36: 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, W. S., Lin, T. Y., and Yeh, E. K. (1995). Chinese societies and mental health. In Lin, T. Y., Tseng, W. S., and Yeh, E. K. (eds.), Chinese societies and mental health, pp. 3–18. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tsoukalas, K. (1982). Exartisi kai anaparagogi. O koinonikos rolos ton ekpadeftikon micharismon stin Ellada (1830–1922) [Dependence and reproduction. The social role of educational procedures in Greece (1830–1922)]. Athens: Themelio.Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analytic studies (Personnel Research Section Report No. 984). Washington, DC: Department of the Army.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuijl, C., Leseman, P. P. M., and Rispens, J. (2001). Efficacy of an intensive home based educational intervention programme for 4- to 6-year-old ethnic minority children in the Netherlands. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(2): 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tylor, E. B. (1889). On a method of investigation the development of institutions: Applied to laws of marriage and descent. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 18: 245–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNICEF (2000). Children and women in Georgia: A situational analysis. Tbilisi, Georgia.
UNICEF/National Planning Commission (1998). Child survival, protection and development in Nigeria: Key social statistics. Abuja, Nigeria.
United Nations Statistics Division (2002a). Demographic, Social and Housing Statistics. Retrieved September, 2002, from http://unstats.un.org/unsd.
United Nations Statistics Division (2002b). Energy Statistics. Retrieved September, 2002, from http://unstats.un.org/unsd.
United States Census Bureau (2000). Statistical abstract of the United States: 2000. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Uzoka, A. F. (1979). The myth of the nuclear family. American Psychologist, 34: 1095–1106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdés, X. (1995). Familia, matrimonio e ilegitimidad en la hacienda del siglo XX [Family, marriage and illegitimate children in the twentieth century estate]. Proposiciones, 26, Aproximaciones a la Familia: 150–165. Santiago: Ediciones SUR.Google Scholar
Valero, A. (1995). El sistema familiar español: Recorrido a través del último cuarto de siglo [The Spanish family system: journey through the last quarter of the century]. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 70: 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaskovics, L. A., Garhammer, M., Schneider, N. F., and Job, O. (1994). Familien und Haushaltsstrukturen in der ehemaligen DDR und in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland von 1980–1989: Ein Vergleich [Family and household structures in the former GDR and the Federal Republic of Germany, 1980–1989: A comparison]. Materialien zur Bevölkerungswissenschaft, special issue 24. Wiesbaden: Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung.
Vassiliou, G. (1966). Dierevnisis metavliton ypiserchomenon is tin psychodynamikin tis Ellinikis oikogenias [An exploration of psychodynamic variables of Greek family]. Athens: Athenian Institute of Anthropos.Google Scholar
Vassiliou, V. and Vassiliou, G. (1973). The implicative meaning of the Greek concept of philotimo. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4: 326–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vayda, A. P. and McKay, B. (1975). New directions in ecology and ecological anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 4: 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vayda, A. P. and Rappoport, R. (1968). Ecology, cultural and non-cultural. In Clifton, J. (ed.), Cultural anthropology, pp. 477–497. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Vijver, F. J. R. van de (2006). Culture and psychology: A SWOT analysis of cross-cultural psychology. In Jing, Q., Zhang, H., and Zhang, K. (eds.), Psychological science around the world, vol. 2, pp. 279–298. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Vijver, F. J. R. and Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analyses for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Vijver, F. J. R. and Poortinga, Y. H. (2002). Structural equivalence in multilevel research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33: 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadia, D. N. (1966). The geology of India, 3rd edn. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wagstaff, M. (2001). Family size in the Peloponnese (southern Greece) in 1700. Journal of Family History, 26: 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waite, J. and Heydari, J. (1995). Iran. Earth, wind and water. Tehran, Iran: Yassavoli Press.Google Scholar
Warrin, J., Solomon, Y., Lewis, C., and Langford, W. (1999). Fathers, work and family life. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.Google Scholar
Watkins, D., Mortazavi, S., and Trofimova, I. (2000). Independent and interdependent conceptions of self: An investigation of age, gender and culture differences in importance and satisfaction ratings. Cross Cultural Research, 34: 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. ([1904] 1958). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Translated by Parsons, T.. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Weisner, T. S., Bradley, C., and Kilbride, P. L. (1997). African families and the crisis of social change. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
Weiss, J. (2000). To have and to hold: Marriage, the baby boom, and social change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Werner, C., Brown, B., and Altman, I. (1997). Environmental psychology. In Berry, J. W., Segall, M. H., and Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural Psychology, vol. 3 Social behavior and applications, pp. 253–290. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Westen, D. (1985). Self and society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westermarck, E. A. (1894–1901). History of human marriage.Google Scholar
White, L. and Rogers, S., (2000). Economic circumstances and family outcomes: A review of the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62: 1035–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, B. D. and Popenoe, D. (2003). The state of our unions: The social health of marriage in America. The National Marriage Project. Retrieved from http://marriage.rutgers. edu/Publications.
Whiten, A., Goodall, J., McGrew, W. C., Nishida, T., Reynolds, V., Sugiyama, Y., Tutin, C. E. G., Wrangham, R. W., and Boesch, C. (1999). Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature, 399: 682–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiting, J. W. M. (1974). A model for psychocultural research. Annual Report, Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Whiting, J. W. M. (1981). Environmental constraints on infant care practices. In Munroe, R. H., Munroe, R. L., and Whiting, B. B. (eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural development, pp. 155-179. New York: GarlandGoogle Scholar
Whiting, J. W. M. and Child, I. L. (1953). Child training and personality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wilke, J. R. (1993). Changes in US mens' attitudes toward the family provider role, 1972–1989. Gender and Society, 2: 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. E. and Best, D. L. (1982). Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty nation study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Williams, J. E. and Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Williams, J. E., Satterwhite, R. C., and Saiz, J. L. (1998). The importance of psychological traits: A cross-cultural study. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Williamson, J., Softas-Nall, B., and Miller, J. (2003). Experiences and emotions of grandparents raising grandchildren: Their experiences and emotions. The Family Journal, 11: 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witkin, H. and Berry, J. W. (1975). Psychological differentiation in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6: 4–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2000). Living standards measurement study. Washington, DC: DECRG-LSMS section.
World Bank (2002). World development report 2002. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wu, D. Y. H. and Tseng, W. S. (1985). Introduction: The characteristics of Chinese culture. In Tseng, W. S. and Wu, D. Y. H. (eds.), Chinese culture and mental health, pp. 3–13. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, S. J. (1979). Family and household: The analysis of domestic groups. Annual Review of Anthropology, 8: 161–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. F. (1988). Familism and development: An examination of the role of family in contemporary China Mainland, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. In Sinha, D. and Kao, H. S. R. (eds.), Social values and development: Asian perspectives, pp. 93–123. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Yang, K.-S. (1986). Chinese personality and its change. In Bond, M. H. (ed.), The psychology of Chinese people, pp. 106–170. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, K. S. (1995). Chinese social orientation: An integrative analysis. In Lin, T. Y., Tseng, W. S., and Yeh, E. K. (eds.), Chinese societies and mental health, pp. 19–39. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, K. S. (1996). The psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of societal modernization. In Bond, M. H. (ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology, pp. 479–498. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yeh, M. H. (1990). “Chinese familism and its change” [In Chinese]. Unpublished manuscript.
Young, M. and Willmott, P. (1957). Family and kinship in East London. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Zach, U. (2003). Familien im Kulturvergleich [Families across cultures]. In Keller, H. (ed.), Handbuch der Kleinkindforschung, 3rd edn., pp. 321–352. Bern, Germany: Huber.Google Scholar
Zadoenko, L. (1999). Shlioybi i rozlutsenia v Ukraini [Marriage and divorce in Ukraine]. Retrieved November 20, 2002, from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua.
Zaman, R. M. (1992). Psychotherapy in the Third World: Some impressions from Pakistan. In Gielen, U. P., Adler, L. L., and Milgram, N. A. (eds.), Psychology in international perspective, pp. 314–321. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Zatsepin, V. I. (1991). Molodaya semya [Young family]. Kiev, Ukraine.Google Scholar
Zill, N., and Rogers, C. (1988). Recent trends in the well-being of children in the United States and their implications for public policy. In Cherlin, A. J., (ed.), The changing American family and public policy, pp. 31–115. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Zinkewych, O. and Hula, V. (1993) Ukraine. Ellicott City, MD: Smoloskyp.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×