References

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511489990.013

Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organization of Accounts. London: Sage

Antaki, C., Houtkoop-Steentra, H. and Rapley, M. (2000). ‘Brilliant. Next question …’: high-grade assessment sequences in the completion of interactional units. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 235–62CrossRef Google Scholar

Antaki, C. and Widdicombe, S. (eds) (1998). Identities in Talk. London: Sage

Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Public speaking and audience responses: some techniques for inviting applause. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 370–409). Cambridge University Press

Atkinson, J. M. and Drew, P. (1979). Order in Court: the Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan

Barclay, C. R. and DeCooke, P. A. (1988). Ordinary everyday memories: some of the things of which selves are made. In U. Neisser and E. Winograd (eds), Remembering Reconsidered: Ecological and Traditional Approaches to the Study of Memory (pp. 91–125). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Barsalou, L. W. (1988). The content and organization of autobiographical memories. In U. Neisser and E. Winograd (eds), Remembering Reconsidered: Ecological and Traditional Approaches to the Study of Memory (pp. 193–243). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Bassili, J. N. (1996). The how and why of response latency measurement in telephone surveys. In N. Schwarz and S. Sudman (eds), Answering Questions: Methodology for Determining Cognitive and Communicative Processes in Survey Research (pp. 319–46). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers

Bateson, G. (1972/1951). Steps to An Ecology of Mind. San Francisco: Chandler

Beach, W. A. (1993). Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ ‘Okay’ usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 325–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Beach, W. A. and Metzger, T. R. (1997). Claiming insufficient knowledge. Human Communication Research, 23, 562–88CrossRef Google Scholar

Benoit, P. J. and Benoit, W. L. (1986). Consciousness: the mindlessness/mindfulness and verbal report controversies. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 50, 41–63CrossRef Google Scholar

Best, J. B. (1999). Cognitive Psychology (5th edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth

Birch, S. A. J. and Bloom, P. (2003). Children are cursed: an asymmetric bias in mental-state attribution. Psychological Science, 14, 283–6CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Billig, M. (1999). Freudian Repression: Conversation Creating the Unconscious. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Bilmes, J. (1992). Referring to internal occurrences: a reply to Coulter. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22, 253–62CrossRef Google Scholar

Bloom, L. (1973). One Word at a Time: the Use of Single Word Utterances before Syntax. The Hague: Mouton

Bohannon, J. N. (1988). Flashbulb memories for the Space Shuttle disaster: a tale of two theories. Cognition, 29, 179–96CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bowers, J. S. (2002). Challenging the widespread assumption that connectionism and distributed representations go hand-in-hand. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 413–45CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bowker, G. and Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Brenner, M. (1985). Survey interviewing. In M. Brenner, J. Brown and D. Canter (eds), The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches (pp. 9–35), London: Academic Press

Brewer, W. F. (1992). The theoretical and empirical status of the flashbulb memory hypothesis. In E. Winograd and U. Neisser (eds). Affect and Accuracy in Recall: Studies of ‘Flashbulb Memories’ (pp. 274–305). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Brown, R. and Kulik, J. (1977). Flashbulb memories. Cognition, 5: 73–99CrossRef Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 2, 1–19CrossRef Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Bruner, J. S., Roy, C. and Ratner, N. (1982). The beginnings of request. In K. Nelson (ed.), Children's Language, vol Ⅲ (pp. 91–138). New York: Gardner Press

Budd, M. (1984). Wittgenstein on meaning, interpretation and rules. Synthese, 58, 303–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Button, G. (1987). Answers as interactional products – two sequential practices used in interviews, Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 160–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Button, G. (ed.). (1993). Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction and Technology. London: Routledge

Button, G., J. Coulter, J. R. E. Lee and W. W. Sharrock (1995). Computers, Minds and Conduct. Oxford: Polity

Cannell, C. F. and Kahn, R. L. (1968). Interviewing. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds), The Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 526–95). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

Cannell, C. F., Miller, P. V. and Oksenberg, L. (1981). Research on interviewing techniques. In S. Leinhardt (ed.). Sociological Methodology (pp. 389–437), San Francisco: Jossey-BassCrossRef

Chafe, W. (1990). Some things that narratives tell us about the mind. In B. K. Britton and A. D. Pellegrini (eds), Narrative Thought and Narrative Language. Hillsdale: Erlbaum

Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and accademic writing. In W. Chafe and J. Nichols (eds), Evidentiality: the Linguistic Coding of Epistemology (pp. 261–72). Norwood NJ: Ablex

Chaiklin, S. and Lave, J. (eds) (1993). Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton

Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of ‘Verbal Behaviour’ by B. F. Skinner. Language, 35, 26–58CrossRef Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Cicourel, A. (1974). Cognitive Sociology: Language and Meaning in Social Interaction. NY: Free Press/Macmillan

Clark, H. H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts, Cognitive Psychology, 11, 430–77CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Colgrove, F. W. (1982). The day they heard about Lincoln. In U. Neisser (ed.), Memory Observed: Remembering in Natural Contexts (pp. 41). San Francisco: Freeman. (Originally published in American Journal of Psychology, 10, 228–55, 1899)

Conway, M. (1992). Developments and debates in the study of human memory. The Psychologist, 5, 439–55Google Scholar

Conway, M. (1995). Flashbulb Memories. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum

Coulter, J. (1979). The Social Construction of Mind: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Linguistic Philosophy. London: Macmillan

Coulter, J. (1983). Rethinking Cognitive Theory. London: Macmillan

Coulter, J. (1985). Two concepts of the mental. In K. J. Gergen and K. E. Davis (eds), The Social Construction of the Person (pp. 129–44). New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef

Coulter, J. (1990). Mind in Action. Oxford: Polity

Coulter, J. (1991). cognition: Cognition in an ethnomethodological mode. In G. Button (eds.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 176–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Coulter, J. (1992). Bilmes on ‘internal states’: A critical commentary. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22, 239–252CrossRef Google Scholar

Coulter, J. (1999). Discourse and mind. Human Studies, 22, 163–181CrossRef Google Scholar

Coulter, J. and Parsons, E. D. (1991). The praxiology of perception: Visual orientations and practical action. Inquiry, 33: 251–272CrossRef Google Scholar

Daly, J. A., Weber, D. J., Vangelisti, A. L., Maxwell, M. and Neal, H. (1989). Concurrent cognitions during conversations: Protocol analysis as a means of exploring conversation, Discourse Processes, 12, 227–44CrossRef Google Scholar

Davidson, J. (1984). Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 102–28

Deutscher, I. (ed.) (1973). What we say / what we do: Sentiments and Acts. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman

Deutscher, I., Pestello, F. P., Frances, H. and Pestello, G. (1993). Sentiments and Acts. New York: Aldine de Gruyter

Dohrenwend, B. S. (1965). Some effects of open and closed questions on respondents' answers, Human Organization, 24, 175–84CrossRef Google Scholar

Drew, P. (1978). Accusations: the occasioned use of members' knowledge of ‘religious geography’ in describing events, Sociology, 12, 1–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Drew, P. (1984). Speakers' reportings in invitation sequences. In J. M. Atkinson and J. C. Heritage (eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 129–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Drew, P. (1987). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics, 25, 219–53CrossRef Google Scholar

Drew, P. (1989). Recalling someone from the past. In D. Roger and P. Bull (eds), Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 96–115). Clevedon and Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters

Drew, P. (1990). Strategies in the contest between lawyer and witness in cross-examination. In J. Levi and A. G. Walker (eds), Language in the Judicial Process (pp. 39–64). New York: PlenumCrossRef

Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 470–520). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Drew, P. (1995). Interaction sequences and ‘anticipatory interactive planning.’ In E. Goody (ed.), The Social Origins of Human Intelligence (pp. 111–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Drew, P. and Heritage, J. C. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: an introduction. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Drew, P. and Wootton, A. (1988). Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order. Cambridge: Polity

Durkheim, E. (1915). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. London: George Allen and Unwin

Edwards, D. (1991). Categories are for talking: on the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory and Psychology, 1, 515–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Edwards, D. (1994). Script formulations: a study of event descriptions in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 211–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Edwards, D. (1995). Two to tango: script formulations, dispositions, and rhetorical symmetry in relationship troubles talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 319–50CrossRef Google Scholar

Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and Cognition. London and Beverly Hills: Sage

Edwards, D. (1999a). Emotion discourse. Culture and Psychology, 5, 271–91CrossRef Google Scholar

Edwards, D. (1999b). Shared knowledge as a performative and rhetorical category. In J. Verschueren (ed.), Pragmatics in 1998: Selected Papers From the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, vol. 2 (pp. 130–41). Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association

Edwards, D. and Middleton, D. (1987). Conversation and remembering: Bartlett revisited. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 77–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992a). Discursive Psychology. London: Sage

Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992b). The chancellor's memory: rhetoric and truth in discursive remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 187–215CrossRef Google Scholar

Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1993). Language and causation: a discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 100, 23–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Edwards, J. C. (1990). The Authority of Language: Heidegger, Wittgenstein and the Threat of Philosophical Nihilism. Tampa: University of South Florida Press

Ekman, P. (1985). Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics, and Marriage. New York: Norton

Ericsson, K. A. and Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. (Revised Edition). Cambridge, MA MIT Press

Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1937). Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic Among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Fiske, S. T. and Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw Hill

Fodor, J. A. (1975). The Language of Thought. New York: Thomas Crowell

Fodor, J. A. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MS: MIT/Bradford Press

Fodor, J. A. (1988). Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Fowler Jr., F. J. and Mangione, T. W. (1990). Standardized Survey Interviewing: Minimizing Interviewer-Related Error. Newbury Park: Sage

Gardner, M. (1985). The Mind's New Science. New York: Basic Books

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall

Garfinkel, H. (1990). A conception of, and experiments with, ‘trust’ as a condition of stable concerted actions. In J. Coulter (ed.), Ethnomethodological Sociology. Vermont: Edward Elgar

Garfinkel, H. (1991). Respecification: evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential haecceity of immortal ordinary society (Ⅰ) – an announcement of studies. In G. Button (ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (pp. 10–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology's Program: Working Out Durkheim's Aphorism. New York: Rowan and Littlefield

Garfinkel, H. and Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney and E. A. Tiryakian (eds), Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments (pp. 337–66). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts

Garfinkel, H. and Wieder, D. L. (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson and R. M. Seiler (eds). Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology (pp. 175–206). London: Sage

Garson, J. (2002). Connectionism. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2002 Edition). 〈http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2002/entries/connectionism/〉

Gergen, K. J. (1994). Realities and Relationships. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Gergen, K. J. (1999). An Invitation to Social Construction. London: Sage

Gibson, J. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum

Glenn, P. (1992). Current speaker initiation of two-party shared laughter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 25: 139–62CrossRef Google Scholar

Glenn, P. (2003). Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Glenn, P. J., LeBaron, C. D. and Mandelbaum, J. (eds) (2003). Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In Honor of Robert Hopper. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum

Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books

Goffman, E. (1981). Response cries. In E. Goffman (ed.), Forms of Talk (pp. 78–123). Oxford: Blackwell

Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1–17CrossRef Google Scholar

Gold, P. E. (1992). A proposed neurobiological basis for regulating memory storage for significant events. In E. Winograd and U. Neiser (eds), Affect and Accuracy in Recall: Studies of ‘Flashbulb Memories’ (pp. 141–61). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Goodwin, C. (1987). Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 115–30CrossRef Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (1995a). Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science, 25, 237–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (1995b). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28 (3, Special Issue, Co-construction, S. Jacoby and E. Ochs, eds), 233–60

Goodwin, C. (1997). The blackness of black: color categories as situated practice. In Resnick, L. B., Säljö, R., Pontecorvo, C. and Burge, B. (eds), Discourse, Tools, and Reasoning (pp. 111–40). Berlin: SpringerCrossRef

Goodwin, C. (2000a). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–522CrossRef Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2000b). Practices of color classification. Mind, Culture and Activity, 7, 19–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2000c). Practices of seeing: visual analysis: an ethnomethodological approach. In T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewett (eds), Handbook of Visual Analysis (pp. 157–82). London: Sage

Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Seeing as situated activity: formulating planes. In Y. Engeström and D. Middleton (eds), Cognition and Communication at Work (pp. 61–95). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M. H. (1997) Contested vision: the discursive constitution of Rodney King. In B.-L., Gunnarsson, P. Linell and B. Nordberg (eds), The Construction of Professional Discourse (pp. 292–316). London: Longman

Goodwin, C. and Ueno, N. (Guest eds), (2000). Vision and Inscription in Practice. Special Double Issue of Mind, Culture and Activity 7, 1–163CrossRef

Gottman, J. M. and Levenson, R. W. (1985). A valid procedure for obtaining self-report of affect in marital interaction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 151–60CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Graesser, A. C., Gernsbacher, M. A. and Goldman, S. R. (1997). Cognition. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Volume Ⅰ: Discourse as Structure and Process (pp. 292–319). London: SageCrossRef

Graham, M. H. (1978). The confrontation clause, the hearsay rule, and the forgetful witness. Texas Law Review, 56, 152–205Google Scholar

Green, D. W. (1975). The effects of task on the representation of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 275–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Greene, J. and Burleson, B. (eds) (2003). The Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills. Mahwah: Erlbaum

Greene, J. O. (1984). A cognitive approach to human communication: an action assembly theory. Communication Monographs, 51, 289–306CrossRef Google Scholar

Greene, J. O. (1995). Production of messages in pursuit of multiple social goals: action assembly theory contributions to the study of cognitive encoding processes. In B. R. Burleson (ed.), Communication Yearbook 18 (pp. 26–53). Thousand Oaks, CA: SageCrossRef

Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66, 377–88CrossRef Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press

Grimshaw, A. D. (1980). Mishearings, misunderstandings, and other non-successes in talk – a plea for redress of speaker-oriented bias. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 31–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Haakana, M. (1999). Laughing Matters: A Conversation Analytic Study of Laughter in Doctor-Patient Interaction. Doctoral thesis, Department of Finnish Language, University of Helsinki

Haakana, M. (2001). Laughter as a patient's resource: dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction, Text, 21, 187–219CrossRef Google Scholar

Halkowski, T. (forthcoming). Realizing the illness: patients' narratives of symptom discovery. In J. Heritage and D. Maynard (eds), Practicing Medicine: Structure and Process in Primary Care Consultations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Harré, R. (2002). Cognitive Science: A Philosophical Introduction. London: Sage

Harris, R. (1981). The Language Myth. London: Duckworth

Harris, R. (1988). Language, Saussure and Wittgenstein. London: Routledge

Heath, C. (1989). Pain talk: the expression of suffering in the medical consultation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 113–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Hepburn, A. (in press). Crying: notes on description, transcription and interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction

Heritage, J. (1983). Accounts in action. In G. N. Gilbert and P. Abell (eds), Accounts and action (pp. 117–31). Farnborough: Gower

Heritage, J. (1984a). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity

Heritage, J. (1984b). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds), Structures of Social Action (pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Heritage, J. (1986). Exposed working on understanding in conversation and news interviews: unpublished

Heritage, J. (1988). Explanations as accounts: a conversation analytic perspective. In C. Antaki (ed.), Understanding Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods (pp. 127–44). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage

Heritage, J. (1990/91). Intention, meaning and strategy: observations on constraints in interaction analysis, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24, 311–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (1998). Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society 27(3): 291–334CrossRef Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (2002). Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: a method of modifying agreement/disagreement. In C. Ford, B. Fox and S. Thompson (eds), The Language of Turn and Sequence (pp. 196–224). Oxford: Oxford University Press

Heritage, J. and Raymond, G. (forthcoming). The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly

Heritage, J. and Robinson, J. (forthcoming). Accounting for the visit: patients' reasons for seeking medical care. In J. Heritage and D. Maynard (eds), Practicing Medicine: Structure and Process in Primary Care Consultations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Heritage, J. and Stivers, T. (1999). Online commentary in acute medical visits: a method of shaping patient expectations. Social Science and Medicine 49, 1501–17CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Heritage, J. and Watson, D. R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 123–62). New York: Irvington

Heritage, J. and Greatbatch, D. (1986). Generating applause: a study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 110–57CrossRef Google Scholar

Hester, S. and Eglin, P. (1997). Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Lanham: University Press of America

Hirst, W. and Gluck, D. (1999). Revisiting Dean's Memory. In E. Winograd, R. Fivush and W. Hirst (eds), Ecological Approaches to Cognition: Essays in Honour of Ulric Neisser (pp. 253–81). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum

Hirst, W. and Manier, D. (1996). Social influences on remembering. In D. Rubin (ed.), Remembering Our Past (pp. 271–90). New York: Cambridge University Press

Hoffman, E. and J. McCoy (1981). Concrete Mama: Prison Profiles From Walla Walla. Columbia: University of Missouri Press

Hopper, R. (1988). Speech, for instance. Journal of Language and Social Interaction, 7, 47–63Google Scholar

Hopper, R. (1989). Conversation analysis and social psychology as descriptions of interpersonal communication. In D. Roger and P. Bull (eds), Conversation (pp. 48–66). Avon: Multilingual Matters

Hopper, R. (ed.). (1990/91). Ethnography and conversation analysis after Talking Culture. Special section in Research on Language and Social Interaction, 25

Hopper, R. (1992). Telephone conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press

Horwitz, H. (1988). ‘I can't remember’: skepticism, synthetic histories, critical action. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 87, 787–820Google Scholar

Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000). Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview: The Living Questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (1994). Meeting both ends: between standardization and recipient design in telephone survey interviews. In P. Ten Have and G. Psathas (eds), Situated Order (pp. 1–16). Lanham: University Press of America

Hubel, D. H. and Wiesel, T. N. (1977). Ferrier lecture: functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 198, 1–59CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hufford, D. (1982). The Terror That Comes in the Night: An Experience-Centred Study of Supernatural Assault Traditions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press

Hunter, J. F. M. (1971). ‘Forms of life’ in Wittgenstein's philosophical investigations. In E. D. Klemke (ed.), Essays on Wittgenstein. Urbana: University of Illinois Press

Hutchby, I. and Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge: Polity

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Hutchins, E. and Klausen, T. (1996). Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In Y. Engeström and D. Middleton (eds), Cognition and Communication at Work (pp. 15–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Hyman. I. E. (1999). Creating false autobiographical memories: why people believe their memory errors. In E. Winograd, R. Fivush and W. Hirst (eds), Ecological Approaches to Cognition: Essays in Honour of Ulric Neisser (pp. 229–52). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum

Jacobs, S. (1988). Evidence and inference in conversation analysis. In J. A. Anderson (ed.). Communication Yearbook 11 (pp. 433–43). Beverly Hills, CA: SageCrossRef

Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance /declination. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 79–96). New York: Irvington Publishers

Jefferson, G. (1984). ‘At first I thought’: a normalizing device for extraordinary events. (presented at the Katholieke Hogeschool Tilburg). Unpublished manuscript

Jefferson, G. (1986). On the interactional unpackaging of a ‘gloss’. Language in Society, 14, 435–66CrossRef Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (1985). An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In T. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. Ⅲ. London: Academic Press

Jefferson, G. (1988). Remarks on ‘non-correction’ in conversation. (presented at the Department of Finnish Language, University of Helsinki). Unpublished manuscript

Jefferson, G. (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger and P. Bull (eds), Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 166–96). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters

Jefferson, G. (1990). List construction as a task and resource. In G. Psathas (ed.), Interaction Competence (pp. 63–93). Lanham: University Press of American

Jefferson, G. (1996). On the poetics of ordinary talk. Text and Performance Quarterly, 16, 1–61CrossRef Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (1997). A note on laughter in ‘male-female’ interaction. Unpublished manuscript

Jefferson, G. and Lee, J. (1992). The rejection of advice: managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds), Talk at Work (pp. 521–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Keenan, J. M., MacWhinney, B. and Mayhew, D. (1982). Pragmatics in memory: a study of natural conversation. In U. Neisser (ed.), Memory Observed: Remembering in Natural Contexts (pp. 315–24). San Francisco: Freeman

Kenny, A. (1967). Descartes on idea. In W. Doney (ed.), Descartes: A Collection of Critical Essays. New York: DoubledayCrossRef

Kinnell, A. M. K. and Maynard, D. W. (1996). The delivery and receipt of safer sex advice in pretest counseling sessions for HIV and AIDS. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24, 405–37CrossRef Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Lamerichs, J. and te Molder, H. F. M. (2003). Computer mediated communication: from a cognitive to a discursive model. New Media and Society, 5, 452–73CrossRef Google Scholar

Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. New York: Cambridge University Press

Lavin, D. and Maynard, D. W. (2001). Standardization vs. rapport: how interviewers handle the laughter of respondents during telephone surveys. American Sociological Review, 66, 453–79CrossRef Google Scholar

Lettvin, J. Y, Maturana, H. R, McCulloch, W. S. and Pitts, W. H. (1959). What the frog's eye tells the frog's brain. Proceedings of the IRE, 47, 1940–1959CrossRef Google Scholar

Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. B. and Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585–612CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Levinson, S. C. (1995). Interactional biases in human thinking. In E. Goody (ed.), Social Intelligence and Human Interaction (pp. 221–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Locke, A., and Edwards, D. (2003). Bill and Monica: memory, emotion and normativity in Clinton's Grand Jury testimony. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 239–56CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Loftus, E. (1979). Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Lutfey, K. and Maynard, D. W. (1998). Bad news in oncology: how physician and patient talk about death and dying without using those words. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 321–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Lynch, M. (1985). Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul

Lynch, M. and Bogen, D. (1996). The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings. Durham: Duke University Press

Mandelbaum, J. and Pomerantz, A. (1990). What drives social action? In K. Tracy (ed.), Understanding Face-to-Face Interaction: Issues Linking Goals and Discourse (pp. 151–66). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum

Mandelbaum, J. and Pomerantz, A. (1991). What drives social action? In K. Tracy and N. Coupland (eds), Multiple Goals in Discourse (pp. 151–66). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters

Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A Computational Investigation of the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: Freeman

Maynard, D. W. (2003). Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Maynard, D. W. and Clayman, S. E. (1991). The Diversity of Ethnomethodology, Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 385–418CrossRef Google Scholar

Maynard, D. W., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., Schaeffer, N. C. and Zouwen, J. van der (2002). Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: Wiley

Maynard, D. W. and Marlaire, C. L. (1992). Good reasons for bad testing performance: the interactional substrate of educational exams. Qualitative Sociology, 15, 177–202CrossRef Google Scholar

Maynard, D. W. and Schaeffer, N. C. (1997). Keeping the gate: declinations of the request to participate in a telephone survey interview. Sociological Methods and Research, 26, 34–79CrossRef Google Scholar

Maynard, D. W. and Schaeffer, N. C. (2000). Toward a sociology of social scientific knowledge: survey research and ethnomethodology's asymmetric alternates. Social Studies of Science, 30, 323–70CrossRef Google Scholar

Maynard, D. W. and Schaeffer, N. C. (2002a). Closing the gate: routes to call termination when recipients decline a telephone survey interview. In D. W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, J. van der Zouwen and N. C. Schaeffer (eds), Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: Wiley

Maynard, D. W. and Schaeffer, N. C. (2002b). Standardization and its discontents: standardization, interaction, and the survey interview. In D. W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, J. van der Zouwen and N. C. Schaeffer (eds), Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: Wiley

Malcolm, N. (1991). The relation of language to instinctive behavior. In J. Hyman (ed.), Investigating Psychology: Sciences of the Mind After Wittgenstein. New York: Routledge

Marlaire, C. L. and Maynard, D. W. (1990). Standardized testing as an interactional phenomenon. Sociology of Education, 63, 83–101CrossRef Google Scholar

McCloskey, M., Wible, C. G. and Cohen, N. J. (1988). Is there a special flashbulb memory mechanism? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 171–81CrossRef Google Scholar

McHoul, A. W. (1987). Why there are no guarantees for interrogators. Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 455–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Melden, A. I. (1961). Free Action. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information, Psychological Review, 63, 81–97CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Miller, G. A., Galanter, E. and Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston

Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Moerman, M. (1988). Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press

Molotch, H. and Boden, D. (1985). Talking social structure: discourse, domination and the Watergate hearings. American Sociological Review, 50: 273–88CrossRef Google Scholar

Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts

Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and Reality. San Francisco: Freeman

Neisser, U. (1981). John Dean's memory: a case study. Cognition, 9: 1–22CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Neisser, U. (1982a). Memory: what are the important questions? In U. Neisser (ed.), Memory Observed: Remembering in Natural Contexts (pp. 3–19). San Francisco: Freeman

Neisser, U. (1982b). Snapshots or benchmarks? In U. Neisser (ed.), Memory Observed: Remembering in Natural Contexts (pp. 43–8). San Francisco: Freeman

Neisser, U. (1988). ‘Five kinds of self knowledge’, Philosophical Psychology, 1, 35–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Neisser, U., Bergman, E., Schreiber, C. A., Palmer, S. E. and Weldon, M. S. (1996). Remembering the earthquake. Memory, 4, 337–57CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Neisser, U and Fivush, R. (eds) (1994). The Remembering Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Neisser, U. and Harsch, N. (1992). Phantom flashbulbs: false recollections of hearing the news about the challenger. In E. Winograd and U. Neisser (eds), Affect and Accuracy in Recall: Studies of ‘Flashbulb Memories’ (pp. 9–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Neisser, U. and Winograd, E. (eds) (1988). Remembering Reconsidered: Ecological and Traditional Approaches to the Study of Memory. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press

Nelson, K. (ed.) (1986). Event Knowledge: Structure and Function in Development. Hillsdale: Erlbaum

Nelson, K. and Gruendel, J. (1981). Generalised event representations: basic building blocks of cognitive development. In M. Lamb and A. Brown (eds), Advances in Development Psychology, vol. Ⅰ (pp. 16–42). Hillsdale: Erlbaum

North, O. (1987). Testimony before the select committee of the House and Senate, transcript published in Taking the Stand. New York: Times Books

Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A. and Thompson, S. A. (ed.). (1996). Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge University Press

O'Keefe, B. J. and Lambert, B. L. (1995). Managing the flow of ideas: a local management approach to message design. In B. R. Burleson (ed.). Communication Yearbook 18 (pp. 54–82). Thousand Oaks: SageCrossRef

Oksenberg, L., Cannell, C. F. and Kalton, G. (1991). New strategies for pretesting survey questions, Journal of Official Statistics, 7, 349–65Google Scholar

Oxford English Dictionary: Second Edition on Compact Disc. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002

Parker, I. and Burman, E. (1993). Against discursive imperialism, empiricism, and constructionism: thirty-two problems with discourse analysis. In E. Burman and I. Parker (eds), Discourse Analytic Research: Repertoires and Readings of Texts in Action (pp. 155–72). London: Routledge

Philipsen, G. (1977). Linearity of research design in ethnographic studies of speaking. Communication Quarterly, 25, 42–50CrossRef Google Scholar

Pike, K. L. (1954). Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of Human Behavior. The Hague: Mouton

Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Flashbulb memories of the assassination attempt on President Reagan. Cognition, 16, 63–80CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pillemer, D. B. (1992). Remembering personal circumstances: a functional analysis. In E. Winograd and U. Neiser (eds), Affect and Accuracy in Recall: Studies of ‘Flashbulb Memories’ (pp. 236–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Pillemer, D. B, Koff, E., Rhinehart, E. D. and Rierdan, J. (1987). Flashbulb memories of menarche and adult menstrual distress. Journal of Adolescence 10, 187–99CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pinch, T. J. and Clark, C. (1986) The hard sell: ‘patter merchanting’ and the strategic (re)production and local management of economic reasoning in the sales routines of market pitchers. Sociology, 20, 169–91CrossRef Google Scholar

Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane Reason: Reality in Everyday and Sociological Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In J. N. Schenkein (ed.). Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp. 79–112). New York: Acdemic PressCrossRef

Pomerantz, A. (1980). Telling my side: ‘Limited access’ as a fishing device. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 186–98CrossRef Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1984a). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Pomerantz, A. (1984b). Giving a source or basis: the practice in conversation of telling ‘What I know’. Journal of Pragmatics, 8, 607–25CrossRef Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: a way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–29CrossRef Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1990). Conversation analytic claims. Communication Monographs, 57, 231–5CrossRef Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1990/91). Mental concepts in the analysis of social action, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24, 299–310CrossRef Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1995). How important is context in teaching interviewing. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10, 411CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pomerantz, A., Fehr, B. J. and Ende, J. (1997). When supervising physicians see patients: strategies used in difficult situations. Human Communication Research, 23, 589–615CrossRef Google Scholar

Potter, J. (1996). Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric, and Social Construction. London: Sage

Potter, J. (1998a). Discursive social psychology: from attitudes to evaluations, European Review of Social Psychology, 9, 233–66CrossRef Google Scholar

Potter, J. (1998b). Cognition as context (whose cognition?), Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, (1, Special Issue, Analyzing Context, K. Tracy, ed.), 29–44

Potter, J. and Edwards, D. (2001). Discursive social psychology. In W. P. Robinson and H. Giles. (eds), The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology (pp. 103–18). London: John Wiley and Sons Ltd

Potter, J. and Edwards, D. (2003). Rethinking cognition: on Coulter, discourse and mind. Human Studies, 26, 165–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Potter, J. and Hepburn, A. (2003). I'm a bit concerned – early actions and psychological constructions in a child protection helpline. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36, 197–240CrossRef Google Scholar

Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage

Psathas, G. and Anderson, T. (1990). The ‘practices’ of transcription in conversation analysis. Semiotica, 78, 75–99CrossRef Google Scholar

Puchta, C. and Potter, J. (2002). Manufacturing individual opinions: market research focus groups and the discursive psychology of attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 345–63CrossRef Google Scholar

Presser, S., Rothgeb, J. M., Coupee, M. P., Lessler, J. T., Martin, J. and Singer, E. (eds) (2004). Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley

Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939–67CrossRef Google Scholar

Raymond, G. and Heritage J. (2004). The epistemics of social relations: owning grandchildren. Unpublished Ms, Dep. of Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara

Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M. and Teasley, S. D. (1991). Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Rogoff, B. and Lave, J. (1984). Everyday Cognition: its Development in Social Context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press

Rosaldo, M. (1982). The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society, 11, 203–37CrossRef Google Scholar

Rumelhart, D. E. Hinton, G. E. and McClelland J. L. (1986). A general framework for parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland and the PDP Research Group (eds), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol. Ⅰ: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Ryle, G. (1963). The Concept of Mind. Harmondsworth; Penguin

Sacks, H. (1984). On doing ‘being ordinary’. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 413–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button and J. R. E. Lee (eds), Talk and Social Organization (pp. 54–69). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd

Sacks, H. (1992a). Lectures on Conversation (vol. Ⅰ, edited by G. Jefferson). Oxford: Blackwell

Sacks, H. (1992b). Lectures on Conversation (vol. Ⅱ, edited by G. Jefferson). Oxford: Blackwell

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735CrossRef Google Scholar

Sanders, R. E. (1987). Cognitive Foundations of Calculated Speech: Controlling Understandings in Conversation and Persuasion. Albany: SUNY Press

Sanders, R. E. (1989). Message effects via induced changes in the social meaning of a response. In J. J. Bradac (ed.), Message Effects in Communication Science (pp. 165–94). Newbury Park: Sage

Sanders, R. E. (1997). The production of symbolic objects as components of larger wholes. In J. O. Greene (ed.), Message Production: Advances in Communication Theory (pp. 245–77). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum

Sanders, R. E. and Freeman, K. E. (1997). Children's neo-rhetorical participation in peer interactions. In I. Hutchby and J. Moran-Ellis (eds), Children and Social Competence: Arenas of Action (pp. 87–114). London: Falmer

Saussure, F. de (1986/1915). Course in General Linguistics (translated by R. Harris). LaSalle: Open Coure Publishers

Savage-Rumbaugh, S. and Lewin R. (1994). Kanzi: An Ape at the Brink of Human Mind. New York: Wiley

Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Shanker, S. G. and Taylor, T. J. (1998). Apes, Language and the Human Mind. New York: Oxford University Press

Schaeffer, N. C. (1991). Conversation with a Purpose – Or Conversation? Interaction in the Standardized Interview. In P. P. Biemer, R. M. Groves, L. E. Lyberg, N. A. Mathiowetz and S. Sudman (eds), Measurement Errors in Surveys (pp. 367–92). New York: Wiley

Schaeffer, N. C. and Maynard, D. W. (2002a). Occasions for intervention: interactional resources for comprehension in standardized survey interviews. In D. W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, J. van der Zouwen and N. C. Schaeffer (eds), Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview (pp. 261–80). New York: Wiley

Schaeffer, N. C. and Maynard, D. W. (2002b). Standardization and interaction in the survey interview. In J. Holstein and J. Gubrium (eds), Handbook of Interviewing, London: Sage

Schaeffer, N. C., Maynard, D. W. and Cradock, R. (1993). Negotiating Certainty: Uncertainty Proposals and Their Disposal in Standardized Survey Interviews. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Center for Demography and Ecology Working Paper, 93–25

Schank, R. C. and Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale: Erlbaum

Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction (pp. 75–119). Glencoe: Free Press

Schegloff, E. A. (1980). Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I ask you a question?”, Sociological Inquiry, 50, 104–52CrossRef Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction. Linguistics, 25: 201–18CrossRef Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1990). Comment on ‘Interactional troubles in face-to-face survey interviews’. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 248–50Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1991a). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L. Resnick, J. Levine and S. Teasley (eds), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 150–71). Washington DC: American Psychological Association

Schegloff, E. A. (1991b). With Half a Mind: Interaction with Commissurotomies. Paper presented at the First Rector's Colloquium, Tel Aviv University

Schegloff, E. A. (1992a). To Searle on conversation: a note in return. In J. R. Searle et al. (eds), (On) Searle on Conversation (pp. 113–28). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins

Schegloff, E. A. (1992b). ‘Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation’, American Journal of Sociology, 98: 1295–345CrossRef Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1992c). Introduction. In G. Jefferson (ed.), Harvey Sacks, Lectures on Conversation, vol. Ⅰ. Oxford: Blackwell

Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 161–216CrossRef Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1999). Discourse, pragmatics, conversation analysis. Discourse Studies, 1, 405–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (forthcoming). A Primer of Conversation Analysis: Sequence Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Schegloff, E. A. and Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327CrossRef Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G. and Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Schutz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press

Schwartz, R. M. and Garamoni, G. L. (1986). Cognitive assessment: a multibehavior-multimethod-multiperspective approach. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 8, 185–97CrossRef Google Scholar

Schwarz, N. (1994). Judgment in social context: biases, shortcomings, and the logic of conversation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 123–62CrossRef Google Scholar

Schwarz, N. and Sudman, S. (1996). Answering Questions: Methodology for Determining Cognitive and Communicative Processes in Survey Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press

Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5, 1–23CrossRef Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 417–24CrossRef Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Searle, J. R. (1998). Mind, Language and Society: Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books

Shannon, C. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 379–423CrossRef Google Scholar

Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational Realities: Constructing Life Through Language. London: Sage

Sillars, A., Roberts, L. J., Leonard, K. E. and Dun, T. (2000). Cognition during marital conflict: the relationship of thought and talk. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 479–502CrossRef Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall

Still, A. and Costall, A. (1991). Against Cognitivism: Alternative Foundations for Cognitive Psychology. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester

Stivers, T. (2002). ‘Symptoms only’ and ‘candidate diagnoses’: presenting the problem in pediatric encounters. Health Communication, 14, 299–338CrossRef Google Scholar

Stivers, T., Mangione-Smith, R., Elliott, M., McDonald, L. and Heritage, J. (2003). ‘Why do physicians think parents expect antibiotics? What parents report vs. what physicians receive. Journal of Family Practice, 29, 140–8Google Scholar

Smith, D. E. (1978). ‘“K is mentally ill”: the anatomy of a factual account’, Sociology, 12, 23–53CrossRef Google Scholar

Stokoe, E. H. and Smithson, J. (2001). Making gender relevant: conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction. Discourse and Society, 12, 217–44CrossRef Google Scholar

Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-machine Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Suchman, L. (1988). Representing practice in cognitive science. Human Studies, 11, 305–25. Reprinted In M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds) (1990). Representation in Scientific Practice (pp. 301–21). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Suchman, L. (2000). Making a case: “Knowledge” and “Routine” work in document production. In P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh and C. Heath (eds), Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing Systems Design (pp. 29–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef

Suchman, L. and Jordan, B. (1990). Interactional troubles in face-to-face survey interviews. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 232–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Sudman, S., Bradburn, N. M. and Schwarz, N. (1996). Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers

Swinney, D. and Prather, P. (1989). On the comprehension of lexical ambiguity by young children: investigations into the development of mental modularity. In D. Gorfein (ed.), Resolving semantic ambiguity (pp. 225–38). New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef

ten Have, P. (1999). Doing Conversation Analysis. London: Sage

te Molder, H. F. M. (1999). Discourse of dilemmas: an analysis of communication planners' accounts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 245–63CrossRef Google Scholar

Tenney, Y. J. (1989). Predicting conversational reports of a personal event. Cognitive Science, 13, 213–33CrossRef Google Scholar

Terasaki, A. (1976/forthcoming). Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. Social sciences Working Paper No. 99, UC Irvine. Also In G. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation. Washington, DC: University Press of America

Thagard, P. (2002). Cognitive science. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2002 edition). URL = 〈http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2002/entries/cognitive-science/〉

Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J. and Rasinski, K. (2000). The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence, Mind, 49, 433–60CrossRef Google Scholar

Waldron, V. R. and Cegala, D. J. (1992). Assessing conversational cognition: levels of cognitive theory and associated methodological requirements. Human Communication Research, 18(4), 599–622CrossRef Google Scholar

Walsh, L. (1994). Final Report of the Independent Counsel for Iran/Contra Matters – United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office

Wetherell, M. and Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the Language of Racism. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester

Whalen, M. and Zimmerman, D. (1990). Describing trouble: practical epistemology in citizen calls to the police. Language in Society, 19, 465–92CrossRef Google Scholar

Whalen, J. and Zimmerman, D. (1998). Observations on the display and management of emotions in naturally occurring activities: the case of ‘hysteria’ in calls to 9-1-1. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 141–59CrossRef Google Scholar

Widdicombe, S. and Wooffitt, R. (1995). The Language of Youth Subcultures: Social Identity in Action. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester

Wieder, D. L. (1988). From resource to topic: some aims of conversation analysis. In J. A. Anderson (ed.). Communication Yearbook 11 (pp. 444–54). Beverly Hills: SageCrossRef

Wiggins, S. (2002). Talking with your mouth full: gustatory ‘mmm's and the embodiment of pleasure. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35, 311–36CrossRef Google Scholar

Wiggins, S. and Potter, J. (2003). Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments, British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 513–31CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Williams, M. (1999). Wittgenstein, Mind and Meaning: Toward a Social Conception of Mind. New York: Routledge

Wilson, G. (1994). Take a number, The New Yorker, July 18, 49

Winch, P. (1983). Im Anfang war die tat. In I. Block (ed.), Perspectives on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations. (2nd Edition) Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and R. Rhees. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell

Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Zettel. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell

Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright. Translated by D. Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell

Wittgenstein, L. (1976). Cause and effect: intuitive awareness. Philosophia, vol. Ⅵ, nos. 3–4CrossRef

Wooffitt, R. C. (1991). ‘I was just doing X … when Y’: some inferential properties of a device in accounts of paranormal experiences. Text, 11, 267–88CrossRef Google Scholar

Wooffitt, R. C. (1992). Telling Tales of the Unexpected: The Organization of Factual Discourse. London: Harvester

Woolgar, S. (1980). Discovery, logic and sequence in a text. In K. D. Knorr, R. Krohn and R. Whitley (eds). The Social Process of Scientific Investigation (pp. 239–68). Dordrecht: Reidel

Wootton, A. J. (1997). Interaction and the Development of Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press

Zimmerman, D. H. (1988). On conversation: the conversation analytic perspective. In J. A. Anderson (ed.). Communication Yearbook 11 (pp. 406–32). Beverly Hills: SageCrossRef

Zimmerman, D. H. (1992). The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 418–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press