Acton, H. B. (1970) Kant's Moral Philosophy. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, E. and Barnet, M. (eds.) (1998) Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akehurst, M. (1984) ‘Humanitarian Intervention’. In Bull 1984b, 95–118.

Akehurst, M. (1992) A Modern Introduction to International Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Alderson, K. and Hurrell, A. (eds.) (2000) Hedley Bull on International Society. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, D. (1993) Revolution and World Order: The Revolutionary State in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bain, W. (2003) ‘The Political Theory of Trusteeship and the Twilight of International Inequality’, International Relations, 17(1), 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barkan, E. (2000) The Guilt of Nations: Restitution and Negotiating International Injustices. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Barry, B. (1995) Justice as Impartiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (1989) Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Baylis, J. and Smith, S. (eds.) (2001) The Globalization of World Politics, 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Beck, L. (ed.) (1988) Kant: Selections. London: Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar

Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Bellamy, A. J. (ed.) (2005) International Society and its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bending, L. (2000) The Representation of Bodily Pain in Late Nineteenth-Century English Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Best, G. (1994) War and Law since 1945. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Blair, T. (2001) ‘Speech to the Labour Party Conference’, The Guardian, 3 October 2001.Google Scholar

Blundell, M. W. (1991) Helping Friends and Harming Enemies: A Study in Sophocles and Greek Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bohman, J. and Lutz-Bachmann, M. (eds.) (1997) Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant's Cosmopolitan Ideal. London: Massachussetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Bolis, J. and Thomas, G. (eds.) (1999) Constructing World Culture: International NonGovernmental Organisations since 1875. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Booth, K. (ed.) (2001) The Kosovo Tragedy: The Human Rights Dimensions. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar

Booth, K. and Dunne, T. (eds.) (2002) Worlds in Collision: Terror and the Future of Global Order. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Booth, K. and Smith, S. (eds.) (1995), International Relations Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bozeman, A. (1960) Politics and Culture in International History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, C. (1988) ‘The Modern Requirement? Reflections on Normative International Theory in a Post Western World’, Millennium, 17(2), 339–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, C. (1995) ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way’, Review of International Studies, 21(2), 183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, C. (1997) Understanding International Relations. Houndmills: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, C. (2001) Understanding International Relations, 2nd ed. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Brown, C., Nardin, T. and Rengger, N. (eds.) (2002) International Relations in Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, P. G. and Shue, H. (eds.) (1981) Boundaries: National Autonomy and its Limits. Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Bull, H. (1966a) ‘Society and Anarchy in International Relations’. In Butterfield and Wight 1966, 35–50, reprinted in Alderson and Hurrell 2000, 77–94.

Bull, H. (1966b) ‘Grotian Conception of International Society’. In Butterfield and Wight 1966, 51–73, reprinted in Alderson and Hurrell 2000, 95–124.

Bull, H. (1969) ‘International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach’. In Knorr and Rosenau 1969, 20–38. Originally published in World Politics, 18(3), 361–77.

Bull, H. (1972a), ‘International Law and International Order’, International Organization, 26 (3), 583–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bull, H. (1972b) ‘The Theory of International Politics 1919–1969’. In Porter 1972, 30–55.

Bull, H. (1973) ‘Options for Australia’. In McCarthy 1973, 1–10.

Bull, H. (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bull, H. (1979a) ‘Human Rights and World Politics’. In Pettman 1979, 79–91.

Bull, H. (1979b) ‘The State's Positive Role in World Affairs’. In Alderson and Hurrell 2000, 139–56.

Bull, H. (1980) ‘The Great Responsibles? The United States, the Soviet Union and World Order’, International Journal, 35(3), 437–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bull, H. (1982) ‘The West and South Africa’, Daedalus, 11, 255–70.Google Scholar

Bull, H. (1983a) ‘Civilian Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’ In Tsoukalis 2003, 149–70.

Bull, H. (1983b) ‘The International Anarchy in the 1980s’, Australian Outlook, 37, 127–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bull, H. (1984a) ‘The Emergence of a Universal International Society’. In Bull and Watson 1984, 117–26.

Bull, H. (ed.) (1984b) Intervention in World Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bull, H. (1986) ‘Hans Kelsen and International Law’. In Tur and Twining 1986, 321–36.

Bull, H. (1990) ‘The Importance of Grotius’. In Bull, Kingsbury and Roberts 1990, 65–93.

Bull, H. (1991) ‘Martin Wight and the Theory of International Relations’. In Wight 1991, ix–xxvii. Originally published in 1976 in British Journal of International Studies, 2, 101–16.

Bull, H. (2000a) ‘International Relations as an Academic Pursuit’. In Alderson and Hurrell 2000, 246–64. Originally published in 1972 in Australian Outlook, 26(3).

Bull, H. (2000b) ‘The State's Positive Role in World Affairs’. In Alderson and Hurrell 2000, 139–56. Originally published in 1979 in Daedalus, 108(4), 111–23.

Bull, H. (2000c) ‘The Twenty Years' Crisis Thirty Years On’. In Alderson and Hurrell 2000, 125–38. Originally published in 1969 in International Journal, 24(4), 625–38.

Bull, H. (2000d) ‘Justice in International Relations’. In Alderson, and Hurrell, 2000, 206–45. Originally published in 1984 as Hagey Lectures, University of Waterloo, Ontario.Google Scholar

Bull, H. (2000e) ‘Natural Law and International Relations’. In Alderson and Hurrell 2000, 157–69. Originally published in 1979 in British Journal of International Studies, 5, 171–81.

Bull, H. (2002) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 3rd ed. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Bull, H., Kingsbury, B. and Roberts, A. (eds.) (1990) Hugo Grotius and International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bull, H. and Watson, A. (eds.) (1984) The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Burke, P., Harrison, B. and Slack, P. (eds.) (2000) Civil Histories: Essays Presented to Sir Keith Thomas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, J. (2004). Precarious Lives: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Butterfield, H. (1951a) The Whig Interpretation of History. London: Bell.Google Scholar

Butterfield, H. (1951b) History and Human Relations. London: Collins.Google Scholar

Butterfield, H. (1951c) ‘The Tragic Element in Modern International Conflict’. In Butterfield 1951b, 9–37.

Butterfield, H. (1953) Christianity, Diplomacy and War. London: Epworth Press.Google Scholar

Butterfield, H. (1966a) ‘The Balance of Power’. In Butterfield and Wight 1966, 132–48.

Butterfield, H. (1966b) ‘The New Diplomacy and Historical Diplomacy’. In Butterfield and Wight 1966, 181–92.

Butterfield, H. (1972) ‘Morality and an International Order’. In Porter 1972, 336–57.

Butterfield, H. and Wight, M. (eds.) (1966) Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Buzan, B. (1993) ‘From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School’, International Organization, 47(3), 327–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, B. (2001) ‘The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR’, Review of International Studies, 27(3), 471–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, B. (2004) From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, B., Jones, C. and Little, R. (1993) The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Buzan, B. and Little, R. (2000) International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carr, D. (1986) ‘Narrative and the Real World: An Argument for Continuity’, History and Theory, 25(2), 117–31.Google Scholar

Carr, E. H. (1939), The Twenty Years' Crisis 1919–1939. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Carr, E. H. (1945) Nationalism and After. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Carr, E. H. (1946) The Twenty Years' Crisis 1919–1939, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1999) The New Military Humanism. Monroe: Common Courage Press.Google Scholar

Cicero, (1967) On Moral Obligation. Introduction and Notes by Higginbotham. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Clark, I. (1989) The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, I. (2003) ‘Legitimacy in a Global Order’, Review of International Studies, 29 (special issue, December 2003, 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, I. (2005) Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, I. and Neumann, I. B. (eds.) (1996) Classical Theories of International Relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Cohen, S. (2001) States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, R. (1996) The Postmodern State and the World Order. London: Demos, Paper 19.Google Scholar

Cox, M. (ed.) (2000) E. H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, R. W. (1981) ‘States, Social Forces and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millennium, 10(2), 126–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, N. C. (2002), Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonisation and Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cummiskey, D. (1996) Kantian Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dan-Cohen, M. (2002) Harmful Thoughts: Essays on Law, Self and Morality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Denemark, R. A., Friedman, J., Gills, B. K. and Modelski, G. (eds.) (2000) World System History: The Social Science of Long-Term Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Derian, J. (1987) On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Derian, J. and Shapiro, M. J. (1989) International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (2000) On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

De-Shalit, A. (1998) ‘Transnational and International Exploitation’, Political Science, 46(4), 693–78.Google Scholar

Donelan, M. (1984) ‘Spain and the Indies’. In Bull and Watson 1984, 75–85.

Donelan, M. D. (1990) Elements of International Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Donnelly, J. (1998) ‘Human Rights: A New Standard of Civilization?’, International Affairs, 74(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doyle, M. (1983) ‘Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs Parts I and II’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12(3), 205–35, 12(4), 232–52.Google Scholar

Doyle, M. (1986) ‘Liberalism and World Politics’, American Political Science Review, 80, 1151–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dray, W. H. (1957) Laws and Explanation in History. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Dunne, T. (1995a) ‘International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled?’, Cooperation and Conflict, 30(2), 125–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunne, T. (1995b) ‘The Social Construction of International Society’, European Journal of International Relations, 1(3), 367–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunne, T. (1998) Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunne, T. (2000a) ‘All Along the Watchtower: A Reply to the Critics of Inventing International Society’, Cooperation and Conflict, 35(2), 227–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunne, T. (2000b) ‘Sociological Investigations: Instrumental, Legitimist and Coercive Interpretations of International Society’, Millennium, 30(1), 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunne, T. (2001) ‘Watching the Wheels Go Round: Replying to the Replies’, Cooperation and Conflict, 36(3), 338–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunne, T. (2003) ‘Society and Hierarchy in International Relations’, International Relations, 17(3), 303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunne, T. and Wheeler, N. (2000) ‘The Blair Doctrine: Advancing the Third Way in the World’. In Little and Wickham-Jones 2000, 61–76.

Dunne, T. and Wheeler, N. J. (eds.) (1999) Human Rights in Global Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elias, N. (1978) The History of Manners: The Civilising Process, Volume One. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Elias, N. (1991) The Symbol Theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Elias, N. (1994) Reflections on a Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Elias, N. (1996) The Germans. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Elias, N. (1998a) ‘The Expulsion of the Huguenots from France’. In Goudsblom and Mennell, 1998.

Elias, N. (1998b) ‘The Breakdown of Civilization’. In Goudsblom and Mennell, 1998.

Elias, N. (2001) The Loneliness of the Dying. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Elman, C. and Elman, M. F. (2001) (eds.) Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists, and the Study of International Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Epp, R. (1998) ‘The English School on the Frontiers of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 24 (special issue), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, G. and Grant, B. (1991) Australia's Foreign Relations in the World of the 1990s. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar

Evans, M. D. (1994) Blackstone's International Law Documents. London: Blackstone Press.Google Scholar

Evans, T. and Wilson, P. (1992) ‘Regime Theory and the English School of International Relations: A Comparison’, Millennium, 21(3), 329–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fawn, R. and Larkins, J. (eds.) (1996a) International Society after the Cold War: Anarchy and Order Reconsidered. Houndmills: Macmillan in association with Millennium.Google Scholar

Fawn, R. and Larkins, J. (1996b) ‘Introduction’. In Fawn and Larkins 1996a, 1–24.

Feinberg, J. (1984) Harm to Others: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Finnemore, M. (1996) ‘Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention’. In Katzenstein 1996, 153–85.

Finnemore, M. (1999) ‘Rules of War and Wars’ Rules: The International Red Cross and the Restraint of State Violence'. In Bolis and Thomas 1999.

Finnemore, M. (2001) ‘Exporting the English School?’, Review of International Studies, 27(3), 509–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998) ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organisation, 52(4), 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, M. (1992) ‘Feudal Europe, 800–1300: Communal Discourses and Conflictual Practices’, International Organisation, 46(2), 427–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fletcher, J. (1997) Violence and Civilization: An Introduction to the Work of Norbert Elias. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Forbes, I. and Hoffman, M. (eds.) (1993) Political Theory, International Relations and the Ethics of Intervention. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forsyth, M. G., Keens-Soper, M. and Savigear, P. (eds.) (1970) The Theory of International Relations: Selected Texts from Gentili to Treitschke. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Fry, G. and O'Hagan, (eds.) (2000) Contending Images of World Politics. Houndmills: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, J. (1994) Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. Colorado: Boulder.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geras, N. (1998) The Contract of Mutual Indifference: Political Philosophy after the Holocaust. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Geras, N. (1999) ‘The View from Everywhere’, Review of International Studies, 25(1), 157–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C.Wright, (eds.) (1948) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Glaser, C. (2003) ‘Structural Realism in a More Complex World’, Review of International Studies, 29(3), 403–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glover, J. (1990) Causing Death and Saving Lives. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Goldgeier, J. M. and McFaul, M. (1992) ‘A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era’, International Organisation, 46(2), 467–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gong, G. (1984) The Standard of ‘Civilisation’ in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Pelaez, A. and Buzan, B. (2003) ‘A Viable Project of Solidarism? The Neglected Contributions of John Vincent's Basic Rights Initiative’, International Relations, 17(3), 321–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, R. (1985) Protecting the Vulnerable: A Reanalysis of our Social Responsibilities. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, G. L. (ed.) (1951) The University Teaching of International Relations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Goodwin, G. L. (1973) ‘International Institutions and International Order’. In James 1973a, 156–87.

Goudsblom, J. (1994) Fire and Civilization. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Goudsblom, J., Jones, E. and Mennell, S. (1996) The Course of Human History: Economic Growth, Social Process and Civilization. London: M. E. Sharpe Inc.Google Scholar

Goudsblom, J. and Mennell, S. (eds.) (1998) The Norbert Elias Reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gouldner, A. (1960) ‘The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement’, American Sociological Review, 25, 161–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grader, S. (1988) ‘The English School of International Relations: Evidence and Evaluation’, Review of International Studies, 14(1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groom, A. J. R. and Light, M. (eds.) (1994) Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar

Grotius, H. ([1646]1925) De Jure Belli ac Pacis. Translated by F. W. Kelsey. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Haas, P. M., Keohane, R. O. and Levy, M. A. (eds.) (1994) Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1984) Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1. Boston Massachusetts: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1997) ‘Kant's Idea of Perpetual Peace, with the Benefit of Two Hundred Years' Hindsight’. In Bohman and Lutz-Bachmann 1997, 113–53.

Hall, I. (2001) ‘Still the English Patient? Closures and Inventions in the English School’, International Affairs, 77–4, 931–42.Google Scholar

Hall, I. (2002) ‘History, Christianity and Diplomacy: Sir Herbert Butterfield and International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 28(4) 719–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, R. B. and Biersteker, T. J. (eds.) (2002) The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, F. (1994) Rethinking International Relations. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, H. L. A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P. and Rittberger, V. (1997) Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Held, D. (ed.) (1991) Political Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Held, D.(1995) Democracy and World Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Hill, C. J. (2003) The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hobbes, T. ([1651]1962) Leviathan. Edited and abridged with an introduction by J. Plamenatz. London: Collins.Google Scholar

Hobden, S. (1998) International Relations and Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobden, S. (1990) and Hobson, J. (eds.) (2002) Historical Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hoffman, M. (1987) ‘Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 16(2), 231–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffmann, S. (1990) ‘International Society’. In Miller and Vincent 1990, 13–37.

Hollis, M. and Smith, S. (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Honderich, T. (1980a) Violence for Equality: Inquiries in Political Philosophy. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Honderich, T. (1980b) ‘Our Omissions and Their Violence’. In Honderich 1980a, 58–100.

Hurrell, A. (1990) ‘Kant and the Kantian Paradigm in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 16(3), 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurrell, A. (1992) ‘Collective Security and International Order Revisited’, International Relations, 11(1), 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurrell, A. (1994) ‘A Crisis of Ecological Viability? Global Environmental Change and the Nation-State’, Political Studies, 42, 146–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurrell, A. (1995) ‘International Political Theory and the Global Environment’. In Booth and Smith 1995, 129–53.

Hurrell, A. (1998) ‘Society and Anarchy in the 1990s’. In Roberson 1998, 17–42.

Hurrell, A. (1999) ‘Power, Principles and Prudence: Protecting Human Rights in a Deeply Divided World’. In Dunne and Wheeler 1999, 277–302.CrossRef

Hurrell, A. (2001) ‘Keeping History, Law and Political Philosophy Firmly Within the English School’, Review of International Studies, 27(3), 489–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurrell, A. (2002) ‘There Are No Rules (George W. Bush): International Order after September 11’, International Relations, 16(2), 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchings, K. (1999) International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a Global Age. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Ignatieff, M. (2000) Virtual War. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar

Jackson, R. H. (1990) Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jackson, R. H. (1995) ‘The Political Theory of International Society’. In Booth and Smith 1995, 110–28.

Jackson, R. H. (1996) ‘Is There a Classical International Theory?’ In Smith, Booth and Zalewski 1996, 203–18.CrossRef

Jackson, R. H. (2000) The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

James, A. M. (1964) ‘Power Politics’, Political Studies, 12(3), 307–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, A. M. (1972) ‘The Contemporary Relevance of National Sovereignty’. In Leifer 1972, 16–34.

James, A. M. (ed.) (1973a) The Bases of International Order: Essays in Honour of C. A. W. Manning. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

James, A. M. (1973b) ‘Law and Order in International Society’. In James 1973a, 60–84.

James, A. M. (1986a) Sovereign Statehood: The Basis of International Society. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

James, A. M. (1986b) ‘The Emerging Global Society’, Third World Affairs 1986, 465–68.Google Scholar

James, A. M. (1989) ‘The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 15(3), 215–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, A. M. (1993) ‘System or Society?’, Review of International Studies, 19(3), 269–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jellinek, G. (1922) Allgemeine Staatslehre. 3rd ed. by W. Jellinek. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Johansen, R. C. (1980) The National Interest and the Human Interest: An Analysis of U. S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, R. E. (1981) ‘The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure’, Review of International Studies, 7(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, R. W. (ed.) (2000) Critical Theory and World Politics. London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Kaldor, M. (1999) New Wars, Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1963a) On History, edited with an introduction by L. W. Beck. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Kant, I. (1963b) ‘Idea for a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan Point of View’. In Kant 1963a, 11–26.

Kant, I.(1965a) The Moral Law: Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Translated by H. J. Paton. London: Hutchinson University Library.Google Scholar

Kant, I.(1965b) The Metaphysical Elements of Justice. Translated by John Ladd. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1970a) ‘On the Commonplace: What May Be True in Theory May Be Useless in Practice’. In Forsyth, Keens-Soper and Savigear 1970.

Kant, I. (1970b) Perpetual Peace. In Forsyth, Keens-Soper and Savigear 1970.

Kant, I. (1988) ‘Idea for a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan Point of View’. In Beck 1988, 320–36.

Kant, I. (2002) ‘Essay on Theory and Practice’. In Brown, Nardin and Rengger 2002, 428–32.

Katzenstein, P. J. (ed.) (1996) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Keal, P. (1983) Unspoken Rules and Superpower Dominance. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keal, P. (ed.) (1992) Ethics and Foreign Policy. St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Keal, P. (1995) ‘Just Backward Children’: International Law and the Conquest of Non-European Peoples', Australian Journal of International Relations, 49(2), 191–206.Google Scholar

Keal, P. (2000) ‘An International Society?’ In Fry and O'Hagan 2000, 61–75.CrossRef

Keal, P. (2003) European Conquest and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: The Moral Backwardness of International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelly, P. (ed.) (1998) Impartiality, Neutrality and Justice: Re-Reading Brian Barry's Justice as Impartiality. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Kelsen, H. (1934) The Legal Process and International Order. The New Commonwealth Research Bureau Publications, Series A, No. 1

Kelsen, H. (1967) Principles of International Law. 2nd ed. by R. W. Tucker. New York: Holt, Rinehard and Winston.Google Scholar

Keohane, R. O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Keohane, R. O. (ed.) (1986a) Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Keohane, R. O. (1986b) ‘Reciprocity in International Relations’, International Organization, 40(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, R. O. (1989a) ‘Closing the Fairness-Practice Gap’, Ethics in International Affairs, 3, 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keohane, R. O. (1989b) International Institutions and State Power. Boulder, Colorado: Westview.Google Scholar

Keohane, R. O. (1989c) ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’. In Keohane 1989b, 158–79.

Kiernan, V. (1998) Colonial Empires and Armies, 1815–1960. Stroud: Sutton Publishing.Google Scholar

Kissinger, H. (1979) White House Years. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar

Knorr, K. and Rosenau, J. N. (eds.) (1969) Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Knudsen, T. B. (2000) ‘Theory of Society or Society of Theorists? With Tim Dunne in the English School’, Cooperation and Conflict, 35(2), 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knudsen, T. B. (2001) ‘Beyond the Watchtower? A Further Note on the Origins of the English School and its Theoretical Potential’, Cooperation and Conflict, 36(3), 331–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Konstan, D. (2001) Pity Transformed. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Krasner, S. D. (1999) Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kutz, C. (2000) Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kyle, D. G. (1998) Spectacles of Death in Ancient Rome. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lamy, S. L. (2001), ‘Contemporary Mainstream Approaches: Neo-Realism and Neo-Liberalism’. In Baylis and Smith 2001, 182–99.

Lang, A. F. (ed.) (2003) Just Intervention. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google ScholarPubMed

Leaver, R. and Richardson, J. L. (eds.) (1993) The Post-Cold War Order: Diagnoses and Prognoses. St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Leifer, M. (ed.) (1972) Constraints and Adjustments in British Foreign Policy. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Lewis, B. (1990) Race and Slavery in the Middle East: An Historical Enquiry. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Linklater, A. (1982/1990) Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linklater, A. (1990a) Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linklater, A. (1990b) ‘What is a Good International Citizen?’ In Keal 1992, 21–43.

Linklater, A. (1993) ‘Liberal Democracy, Constitutionalism and the New World Order’. In Leaver and Richardson 1993, 29–38.

Linklater, A. (1996a) ‘The Achievements of Critical Theory’. In Smith, Booth and Zalewski 1996, 279–98.

Linklater, A. (1996b) ‘Citizenship and Sovereignty in the Post-Westphalian State’, European Journal of International Relations, 2(1), 77–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linklater, A. (1998) The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Linklater, A. (2000) ‘E. H. Carr, Nationalism and the Future of the Sovereign State’. In Cox 2000, 234–57.CrossRef

Linklater, A. (2001) ‘Citizenship, Humanity and Cosmopolitan Harm Conventions’, International Political Science Review, 22(3), 261–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linklater, A. (2002a) ‘The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Implications for the Sociology of States-System’, International Affairs, 78(2), 319–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linklater, A. (2002b) ‘Unnecessary Suffering’. In Booth and Dunne 2002, 303–12.

Linklater, A. (2002c) ‘Towards a Critical Historical Sociology of Transnational Harm’. In Hobden and Hobson 2002, 162–80.

Linklater, A. (2002d) ‘The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Implications for a Sociology of States Systems’, International Affairs, 78(2), 319–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linklater, A. (2004) ‘Norbert Elias, The “Civilising Process” and International Relations’, International Politics, 41, 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Little, R. (1994) ‘International Relations and Large-Scale Historical Change’. In Groom and Light 1994, 9–26.

Little, R. (1995) ‘Neorealism and the English School: A Methodological, Ontological and Theoretical Reassessment’, European Journal of International Relations, 1(1), 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Little, R. (1996) ‘Friedrich Gentz, Rationalism and the Balance of Power’. In Clark and Neumann 1996, 210–32.

Little, R. (2002a) ‘The English School's Contribution to the Study of International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 6(3), 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Little, R. (2002b) ‘International System, International Society and World Society: A Re-Evaluation of the English School’. In Roberson, 2002, 68–85.

Little, R. (2003) ‘The English School vs. American Realism’, Review of International Studies, 29(3), 443–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Little, R. and Wickham-Jones, M. (eds.) (2000) New Labour's Foreign Policy: A New Moral Crusade?Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Luard, E. (1976) Types of International Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Lynch, M. (2000) ‘The Dialogue of Civilisations and International Public Sphere Theory’, Millennium, 29(2), 307–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynch, M. (2002) ‘Why Engage? China and the Logic of Communicative Engagement’, European Journal of International Relations, 8(2), 187–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyons, G. M. (1986) ‘The Study of International Relations in Great Britain: Further Connections’, World Politics, 38(4), 626–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackie, J. (1977) Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

MacMillan, J. (1995) ‘A Kantian Protest Against the Peculiar Discourse of Inter-Liberal State Peace’, Millennium, 24(3), 549–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacMillan, J. (1998) ‘The Power of the Pen: Liberalism's Ethical Dynamic and World Politics’, Millennium, 27(3), 637–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makinda, S. M. (2000) ‘International Society and Eclecticism in International Relations Theory’, Cooperation and Conflict, 35(2), 205–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makinda, S. M. (2001) ‘International Society and Global Governance’, Cooperation and Conflict, 36(3), 334–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mandelbaum, M. (1971) History, Man, and Reason: Study in Nineteenth-Century Thought. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Mann, M. (1986) The Sources of Social Power: A History of Power from the Beginning to A. D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manning, C. A. W. (1936) ‘The Future of the Collective System’. In Geneva Institute of International Relations, Problems of Peace, 10th series, Anarchy or World Order. London: Allen and Unwin, 152–77.Google Scholar

Manning, C. A. W. (1951a) ‘International Relatons: An Academic Discipline’. In Goodwin 1951, 11–26.

Manning, C. A. W. (1951b) ‘Report of the General Rapporteur’. In Goodwin, 1951, 27–73.

Manning, C. A. W. (1954) The University Teaching of Social Sciences: International Relations – A Report Prepared on Behalf of the International Studies Conference. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar

Manning, C. A. W. (1962) The Nature of International Society. London: Macmillan, Bell and Sons.Google Scholar

Manning, C. A. W. (1964) ‘In Defence of Apartheid’, Foreign Affairs, 43(1), 135–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manning, C. A. W. (1966c) Collective Selfhoods: An Element in the South West Africa Case, Being the Testimony of an Academic South African. London: South Africa Society.Google Scholar

Manning, C. A. W. (1972) ‘The Legal Framework in a World of Change’. In Porter 1972, 301–35.

Manning, C. A. W. (1975) The Nature of International Society, reissue. London: Macmillan, first published by the London School of Economics in 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mason, M. (2001) ‘Transnational Environmental Obligations: Locating New Spaces of Accountability in a Post-Westphalian Order’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(4), 407–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matravers, M. (1998) ‘What's “Wrong” in Contractualism?’. In Kelly 1998, 108–19.

Mayall, J. B. (ed.) (1982) The Community of States: A Study in International Political Theory. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Mayall, J. B. (ed.) (1996) The New Interventionism, 1991–1994: United Nations Experience in Cambodia, Former Yugoslavia and Somalia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayall, J. B. (2000a) ‘Democracy and International Society’, International Affairs, 76(1), 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayall, J. B. (2000b) ‘The Concept of Humanitarian Intervention Revisited’. In Schnabel and Thakur 2000, 319–33.

Mayall, J. B. (2000c) World Politics: Progress and its Limits. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

McCarthy, G. (ed.) (1973) Foreign Policy for Australia: Choices for the 1970s. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar

McGrew, A. and Lewis, P. et al (eds.) (1992) Global Politics: Globalization and the Nation-State. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Meron, T. (1998) Bloody Constraint: War and Chivalry in Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Midgley, E. B. F. (1979) ‘Natural Law and the “Anglo-Saxon” – Some Reflections in Response to Hedley Bull’, British Journal of International Studies, 5(3), 260–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, J. D. B. (1990) ‘The Third World’. In Miller and Vincent 1990, 65–94.

Miller, J. D. B. and Vincent, R. J. (eds.) (1990) Order and Violence: Hedley Bull and International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Mitrany, D. A. (1966) A Working Peace System. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar

Naff, T. (1984) ‘The Ottoman Empire and the European States System’. In Bull and Watson 1984, 143–69.

Nardin, T. (1983) Law, Morality and the Relations of States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Neiman, S. (2002) Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative History of Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Neumann, I. B. (1997a) ‘John Vincent and the English School of International Relations’. In Neumann and Waever 1997, 38–65.

Neumann, I. B. and Waever, O. (eds.) (1997b) The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Neumann, I. B. and Welsh, J. M. (1991) ‘The Other in European Self-Definition: An Addendum to the Literature on International Society’, Review of International Studies, 17(4), 327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Northedge, F. S. (1976) The International Political System. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. (1997) ‘Kant and Cosmopolitanism’. In Bohman and Lutz-Bachmann 1997, 25–57.

Oakeshott, M. (1974) Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

O'Hagan, J. (2002) Conceptualizing the West in International Relations: From Spengler to Said. Houndsmill, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Neill, O. (1989) ‘Justice, Gender and International Boundaries’, British Journal of Political Science, 20, 439–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Neill, O. (1991) ‘Transnational Justice’. In Held 1991, 276–304.

O'Neil, O. (2000) Bounds of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Onuma, Y. (ed.) (1993a) A Normative Approach to War: Peace, War, and Justice in Hugo Grotius. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Onuma, Y, (1993b) ‘War’. In Onuma 1993a, 57–121.

Onuma, Y. (1998) Jinken, Kokka, Bunmei. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobo.Google Scholar

Onuma, Y. (2000) ‘When Was the Law of International Society Born? An Inquiry of the History of International Law from an Intercivilizational Perspective’, Journal of the History of International Law, 2, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppenheim, L. (1905–6) International Law. 2 vols. London: Longmans, Green.CrossRef

Oppenheim, L. ([1911]1921) The Future of International Law. Translation by J. P. Pate of Die Zukunft des Völkerrechts (1911). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ortega, M. C. (1996) ‘Vitoria and the Universalist Conception of International Relations’. In Clark and Neumann 1996, 99–119.

Paton, H. J. (1953) The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant's Moral Philosophy. London: Hutchinson's University Library.Google Scholar

Peters, J. and Wolper, A. (eds.) (1995) Women's Rights, Human Rights: International Feminist Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pettman, R. (ed.) (1979) Moral Claims in World Affairs. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Pogge, T. (2002) World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Porter, B. (ed.) (1972) The Aberystwyth Papers: International Politics 1919–1969. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pouncey, P. R. (1980) The Necessities of War: A Study of Thucydides' Pessimism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pufendorf, S. ([1688]1935) De Jure Naturae et Gentium. Translated by C. H. Oldfather and W. A. Oldfather. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Pufendorf, S. (2002) ‘On the Duties of Man and Citizen’. In Brown, Nardin and Rengger 2002, 341–8.

Rabinow, P. (1986) The Foucault Reader. Harmondworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Rae, H. (2002) State Identities and the Homogenisation of Peoples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ray, J. L. (1995) Democracy and International Conflict: An Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Proposition. Columbia, SC.: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Rengger, N. (2000) International Relations, Political Theory and the Problem of World Order: Beyond International Relations Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, C. (1999) The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, C. (2002) ‘Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4(3), 487–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rich, J. and Shipley, G. (eds.) (1993) War and Society in the Greek World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Richardson, J. (2000) Contending Liberalisms. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar

Richter, J. (2001) Holding Corporations Accountable: Corporate Conduct, International Codes and Citizen Action. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Rittberger, V. (ed.) (1993) Regime Theory and International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Roberson, B. A. (ed.) (1998) The Structure of International Society. London: Pinter.Google Scholar

Roberson, B. A. (ed.) (2002) International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Roberts, A. (1991) ‘Foreword’. In Wight 1991, xxiv–xxvii.

Roberts, A. (1993) ‘Humanitarian War: Military Intervention and Human Rights’, International Affairs, 69(3), 429–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, A. (1999) ‘NATO's “Humanitarian War” over Kosovo’, Survival, 41(3), 102–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, A. and Kingsbury, B. (eds.) (1993) United Nations, Divided World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, A. and Guelff, R. (eds.) (2000) Documents on the Laws of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rodley, N. (1987) The Treatment of Prisoners under International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, J. (1994) The Empire of Civil Society. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (1930) The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J.-J. (1968a) The Social Contract and Discourses. London: Dent.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J.-J. (1968b) A Discourse of Political Economy. In Rousseau (1968a), 233–69.

Rousseau, J.-J. (1970a) ‘The State of War’. In Forsyth, Keens-Soper and Savigear 1970, 167–78.

Rousseau, J.-J. (1970b) ‘Abstract of the Abbe de Saint-Pierre's Project for Perpetual Peace’. In Forsyth, Keens-Soper and Savigear 1970, 131–56.

Rowe, C. and Schofield, M. (eds.) (2000) Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sadowski, Y. (1998) The Myth of Global Chaos. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. (1966) Arms and Influence. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Schnabel, A. and Thakur, R. (eds.) (2000) Kosovo and the Challenge of Humanitarian Intervention: Selective Indignation and International Citizenship. Tokyo: United Nations University.Google Scholar

Shapcott, R. (1994) ‘Conversation and Coexistence: Gadamer and the Interpretation of International Society’, Millennium, 23(4), 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapcott, R. (2000) ‘Solidarism and After: Global Governance, International Society and the Normative “Turn” in International Relations’, Pacifica Review, 12(2), 147–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharp, P. (2003) ‘Herbert Butterfield, the English School and the Civilizing Virtues of Diplomacy’, International Affairs, 79(4), 855–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaw, M. (1994) Global Society and International Relations. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Shinoda, H. (2000) ‘The Politics of Legitimacy in International Relations: A Critical Examination of NATO's Intervention in Kosovo’, Alternatives, 25(4), 515–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipley, G. (1993) ‘The Limits of War’. In Rich and Shipley 1993, 1–24.

Shklar, J. (1984) Ordinary Vices. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Shue, H. (1981) ‘Exporting Hazards’. In Brown and Shue 1981, 107–45.CrossRef

Smith, K. E. and Light, M. (eds.) (2001) Ethics and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, S., Booth, K. and Zalewski, M. (eds.) (1996) International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stamatopoulou, E. (1995) ‘Women's Rights and the United Nations’. In Peters and Wolper 1995, 36–48.

Stivachtis, Y. A. (1998) The Enlargement of International Society: Culture versus Anarchy and Greece's Entry into International Society. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suganami, H. (1982) ‘International Law’. In Mayall 1982, 63–72.

Suganami, H. (1983) ‘The Structure of Institutionalism: An Anatomy of British Mainstream International Relations’, International Relations, 7(5), 2363–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suganami, H. (1984) ‘Japan's Entry into International Society’. In Bull and Watson 1984, 185–99.

Suganami, H. (1986) ‘Reflections on the Domestic Analogy: The Case of Bull, Beitz and Linklater’, Review of International Studies, 12(2), 145–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suganami, H. (1989) The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suganami, H. (1996) On the Causes of War. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suganami, H. (1997) ‘Narratives of War Origins and Endings: A Note on the End of the Cold War’, Millennium, 26(3), 631–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suganami, H. (1999) ‘Agents, Structures, Narratives’, European Journal of International Relations, 5(3): 365–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suganami, H. (2000) ‘A New Narrative, a New Subject? Tim Dunne on the “English School” ’, Cooperation and Conflict, 35(2), 217–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suganami, H. (2001a) ‘C. A. W. Manning and the Study of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 27(1), 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suganami, H. (2001b) ‘Eikoku-gakuha to Hedorii Buru’, Kokusaiseiji, 126, 199–210.Google Scholar

Suganami, H. (2001c) ‘Heroes and a Villain: A Reply to Tim Dunne’, Cooperation and Conflict, 36(3), 327–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suganami, H. (2001d) ‘Alexander Wendt and the English School’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 4(4), 403–23.Google Scholar

Suganami, H. (2002) ‘On Wendt's Philosophy’, Review of International Studies, 28(1), 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suganami, H. (2003) ‘British Institutionalists, or the English School, Twenty Years On’, International Relations, 17(3), 253–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanaka, A. (2002) The New Middle Ages. Translated by Hoff, J. H.. Tokyo: The International House of Japan.Google Scholar

Thomas, S. (2001) ‘Faith, History and Martin Wight: The Role of Religion in the Historical Sociology of the English School of International Relations’, International Affairs, 77(4), 905–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, S. (2002) ‘A Pilgrim's Progress? Progress, Passion and Hope in Martin Wight's International Thought’, paper delivered at the International Studies Association Convention, New Orleans.

Thornberry, P. (2002) Indigenous Peoples and Human Rights. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thucydides, (1972) The Peloponnesian War. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Tilly, C. (1992) Coercion, Capital and European States, AD 900–1992. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Toynbee, A. (1978) Mankind and Mother Earth. London: Paladin.Google Scholar

Tronto, J. (1994) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Tsoukalis, L. (ed.) (2003) The European Community: Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Tur, R. and Twining, W. (ed.) (1986) Essays on Kelsen. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Van Benthem van den Bergh, G. (1992) The Nuclear Revolution and the End of the Cold War: Forced Restraint. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Vattel, E. (1970) ‘The Law of Nations or the Principle of Natural Law’. In Forsyth, Keens-Soper and Savigear 1970.

Vattel, E. ([1758]1916) Le Droit des Gens. Translated by C. G. Fenwick. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institute of Washington.Google Scholar

Verkamp, B. J. (1993) The Moral Treatment of Returning Warriors in Early Medieval and Modern Times. Scranton: University of Scranton Press.Google Scholar

Vincent, R. J. (1974) Nonintervention and International Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Vincent, R. J. (1983) ‘Change and International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 9(1), 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vincent, R. J. (1984a) ‘Edmund Burke and the Theory of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 10, 205–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vincent, R. J. (1984b) ‘Racial Inequality’. In Bull and Watson 1984, 239–54.

Vincent, R. J. (1986a) Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vincent, R. J. (ed.) (1986b) Foreign Policy and Human Rights: Issues and Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vincent, R. J. (1990a) ‘Grotius, Human Rights and Intervention’. In Bull, Kingsbury and Roberts 1990, 241–56.

Vincent, R. J. (1990b) ‘Order in International Politics’. In Miller and Vincent 1990, 38–64.

Vincent, R. J. (1992) ‘Modernity and Universal Human Rights’. In McGrew and Lewis et al 1992, 269–92.

Vincent, R. J. and Wilson, P. (1993) ‘Beyond Non-Intervention’. In Forbes and Hoffman 1993, 122–30.CrossRef

Walker, R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Waltz, K. N. (1959) Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Waltz, K. N. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Walzer, M. (1980) Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Warnock, G. (1971) The Object of Morality. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Watson, A. (1982) Diplomacy: The Dialogue Between States. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Watson, A. (1987) ‘Hedley Bull, States Systems and International Societies’, Review of International Studies, 13, 147–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watson, A. (1990) ‘Systems of States’, Review of International Studies, 16(2), 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watson, A. (1992) The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Watson, A. (1997) The Limits of Independence: Relations Between States in the Modern World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Watson, A. (2001) ‘Foreword’, ‘Forum on the English School’, Review of International Studies, 27(3), 467–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, M. (1948) ‘Politics as a Vocation’. In Gerth and Mills 1948, 77–128.

Weller, M. (1999) ‘On the Hazards of Foreign Travel for Dictators and Other International Criminals’, International Affairs, 75(3), 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wells, D. A. (1992) The Laws of Land Warfare: A Guide to the U. S. Army Manuals. London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Welsh, J. (1996) ‘Edmund Burke and the Commonwealth of Europe: The Cultural Bases of International Order’. In Clark and Neumann 1996, 173–92.

Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wendt, A. (2000) ‘What Is International Relations for? Notes toward a Postcritical View’. In Jones 2000, 205–25.

Wertheimer, A. (1996) Exploitation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Wesson, R. G. (1978) State Systems: International Pluralism, Politics and Culture. London: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Wheeler, N. J. (1992) ‘Pluralist and Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21, 463–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheeler, N. J. (1996) ‘Guardian Angel or Global Gangster: The Ethical Claims of International Society Revisited’, Political Studies, 44(1), 123–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheeler, N. J. (2000) Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wheeler, N. J. (2001a) ‘Humanitarian Intervention after Kosovo’, International Affairs, 77(1), 113–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheeler, N. J. (2001b) ‘Reflections on the Legality and Legitimacy of NATO's Intervention in Kosovo’. In Booth 2001, 145–63.

Wheeler, N. J. (2002) ‘Dying for “Enduring Freedom”: Accepting Responsibility for Civilian Casualties in the War against Terrorism’, International Relations, 16(2), 205–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheeler, N. J. (2003) ‘Humanitarian Intervention after September 11, 2001’. In Lang 2003, 192–216.

Wheeler, N. J. and Dunne, T. (1996) ‘Hedley Bull's Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will’, International Affairs, 72, 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheeler, N. J. and Dunne, T. (1998) ‘Good Citizenship: A Third Way for British Foreign Policy’, International Affairs, 74(4), 847–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wheeler, N. J. and Dunne, T. (2001) ‘Blair's Britain: A Force for Good in the World?’ In Smith and Light, 167–84.

White, H. V. (1975) ‘Historicism, History, and the Figurative Imagination’, History and Theory, 14(4) Beiheft 14, 48–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiesel, E. et al (1977) Dimensions of the Holocaust. Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Wight, M. (1966a) ‘Why Is There No International Theory?’, in Butterfield and Wight 1966, 17–34.

Wight, M. (1966b) ‘Western Values in International Relations’, in Butterfield and Wight 1966, 89–131.

Wight, M. (1966c) ‘The Balance of Power’, in Butterfield and Wight 1966, 149–75.

Wight, M. (1973) ‘The Balance of Power and International Order’. In James 1973a, 85–115.

Wight, M. (1977) Systems of States, Edited by Bull, H.. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar

Wight, M. (1978) Power Politics. Edited by H. Bull and C. Holbraad. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar

Wight, M. (1991) International Theory: The Three Traditions. Edited by G. Wight and B. Porter. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar

Wight, M. (2004) Four Seminal Thinkers in International Theory: Machiavelli, Grotius, Kant and Mazzini. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkinson, D. (2000) ‘Civilisations, World Systems and Hegemonies’. In Denemark, Friedman, Gills and Modelski 2000, 54–84.

Williams, N. M. (1986) The Yolngu and Their Land: A System of Land Tenure and the Fight for its Recognition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, P. (1989) ‘The English School of International Relations: A Reply to Sheila Grader’, Review of International Studies, 15(1), 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfers, A. (1962a) Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Wolfers, A. (1962b) ‘Amity and Enmity Among Nations’. In Wolfers 1962a, 25–35.

Wolfers, A. (1962c) ‘Statesmanship and Moral Choice’. In Wolfers 1962a, 47–65.

Wolff, C. ([1764]1934) Ius Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum. Translated by J. H. Drake. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Yost, D. S. (2004) ‘Introduction: Martin Wight and Philosophers of War and Peace’. In Wight 2004.