Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T22:50:58.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Bertin Martens
Affiliation:
European Commission
Uwe Mummert
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute, Jena
Peter Murrell
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Paul Seabright
Affiliation:
Université de Toulouse
Get access

Summary

THE SETTING

This book is about the institutions that guide the behaviour of persons involved in the implementation of foreign aid programmes. Following North (1990), it distinguishes between institutions and organisations. Institutions are the formal and informal rules of behaviour that constitute incentives for all agents involved in the aid delivery process; they affect the performance of foreign aid programmes. Organisations are the groups of persons that adhere to a particular set of these rules. In the case of aid, they include taxpayers and donor organisations, politicians, lobby groups, donor agencies and consultants in donor countries, and recipient organisations in beneficiary countries. This book analyses how these institutions affect the outcomes produced by organisations involved in the aid delivery process. It diverges from more traditional approaches to aid performance because it seeks to explain that performance in terms of incentives inside the aid delivery process, rather than recipient country policy performance. The proposed approach also differs from game-theoretic models that attempt to explain aid performance in terms of outcomes of strategic interactions between donors and recipients at macro-institutional level. This book goes down to micro-level decision-making processes and behaviour by agents working in donor agencies, subcontractors hired by these agencies and officials working in beneficiary country organisations. It will show that incentives and constraints for individual agents can diverge significantly from those of the organisation that they work for and thus lead to very different behavioural outcomes from those predicted by macro-institutional approaches.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aghion, Ph. and Tirole, J. (1997) Formal and real authority in organisations. Journal of Political Economy, 105(1), 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. (1983) A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(3), 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, P. (1994) The Impact of Foreign Aid on Savings and Growth. Mimeo. London: London School of Economics
Burnside, C. and Dollar, D. (1996) Aid, Policies and Growth. Policy Research Working Paper 1777. Washington DC: World Bank
Burnside, C. and Dollar, D.(2000) Aid, policies and growth. American Economic Review, 90(4), 847–68CrossRef
Carr, S. M., Eilish, 000, and MacLachlan, Malcolm (1998) Psychology of Aid. London: Routledge
Clague, Ch. (ed.) (1998) Institutions and Economic Development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Coase, R. (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R.(1960) The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44CrossRef
Collier, P., Guillaumont, P. and , S., and Gunning, J. W. (1997) Redesigning conditionality. World Development, 25(9), 1399–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devarajan, S., Dollar D., and Holmgren, T. (1999) Aid and Reform in Africa. Draft summary report, World Bank Development Research Group working paper. Washington DC: World Bank
Dixit, A. (1997) Power of incentives in private versus public organisations. American Economic Review, 87(2), 378–382Google Scholar
Dollar, D. and Svensson, J. (1998) What explains the success or failure of structural adjustment programs? Mimeo. Washington DC: World Bank
Downs, A. (1967) Inside bureaucracy. Rand Corporation research study. Boston, MA: Little & Brown
European Commission (1997) Phare Interim Evaluation Report. EC Evaluation Unit. Brussels: European Commission. Available at http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/europeaid/evaluation
European Commission (1998) Evaluation of aspects of EU Development Aid to the Mediterranean Region. By Cowi, NEI and Andante. Brussels: European Commission. Available at http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/europeaid/evaluation
European Commission (2000) The European Community External Co-operation Programmes: Policies, Management and Distribution. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/europeaid/evaluation
Frey, B., Horn, H., Persson, T., and Schneider, F. (1985) A formulation and test of a simple model of World Bank behaviour. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 121(3), 438–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furubotn, E. and Richter, R. (1998) Institutions and Economic Theory: the contribution of the new institutional economics. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press
Grossman, S. and Hart, O. (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: a theory of lateral and vertical integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 691–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, S. and Webb, S. (eds.) (1994) Voting for Reform: democracy, political liberalisation and economic adjustment. New York: Oxford University Press
Holmstrom, B. and Milgrom, P. (1991) Multitask principal–agent analyses: incentive contracts, asset ownership and job design. Journal of Law, Economics and Organisation, 7, 24–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killick, T. (1995) A principal–agent analysis of conditionality – a reader's digest. London: Overseas Development Institute
Laffont, J. J. and Tirole, J. (1993) A Theory of Incentives in Regulation and Procurement. Cambridge, MA: MIT press
Martimort, D. (1991) Multiple Principals as a Commitment Mechanism. Mimeo. Toulouse: University of Toulouse
Masten, S. and Williamson, O. (1999) The Economics of Transaction Costs. Cheltenham Edward Elgar
McCubbins, S.Noll, 000gast, 000 (1988) Administrative procedures as means of political control. Journal of Law, Economics and Organisation, 3(2), 243–278Google Scholar
Mosley, P. (1997) Conditionality as a bargaining process: structural adjustment lending 1980–86. Princeton Essays in International Finance, 168
Murshed, S. and Sen, S. (1995) Aid conditionality and military expenditure reduction in developing countries: models of asymmetric information. Economic Journal, 105, 498–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Ostrom, E., Gibson, C., Shivakumar, S., and Andersson, K. (2001) Aid, incentives and Sustainability: an institutional analysis of development co-operation. Mimeo, produced for the Swedish International Development Agency, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University
Pietrobelli, C. and Scarpa, C. (1992) Inducing efficiency in the use of foreign aid, Journal of Development Studies, 29(1), 72–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quarles van Ufford, P., Kruyt, D., and Downing, Th. (1988) The Hidden Crisis in Development: Development Bureaucracies. Amsterdam: Free University Press and United Nations University
Ranis, G. and Mahmood, S. (1992) The Political Economy of Development Policy Change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell
Rodrik, D. (1997) Why is There Multilateral Lending. In the proceedings of the 1995 Annual Conference on Development Economics. Washington DC: World Bank
Simon, H. and Barnard, Ch. (1958) Administrative Behavior: a Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Macmillan
Streeten, P. (1988) Conditionality: a double paradox. In: North-South Co-operation in Retrospect and Prospect. London: Routledge
Svensson, J. (1997) When is Foreign aid Policy Credible. Policy research working paper 1740. Washington DC: World Bank
Tirole, J. (1994) The internal organisation of government. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirole, J. (1999) Incomplete contracts: where do we stand?Econometrica, 67(4), 741–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trombetta, M. (1992) Does conditionality help? An agency approach to conditional development aid. Giornali Degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 51, 77–96Google Scholar
Tsikata, T. (1998) Aid Effectiveness: a Survey of Recent Empirical Literature. Washington DC: IMF Paper on Policy Analysis, PPAA/98/1
White, H. (1992) The macro-economic impact of development aid: a critical survey. Journal of Development Studies, 21(2), 163–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free press
Whitman, D. (1995) The Myth of Democratic Failure: Why Political Institutions are Efficient. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
World Bank (1997) World Development Report 1997. Washington DC: World Bank

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×