Abel, Richard L., American Lawyers (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Abramowitz, Michael E., “Bureaucrats and Lawyers: Myths and Realities,” Bureaucrat 2 (1973), 257–8Google Scholar

Allegretti, Joseph, “Have Briefcase Will Travel: An Essay on the Lawyer as Hired Gun,” Creighton Law Review 24 (1990–1), 747–80Google Scholar

Aman, Alfred C. Jr., “The Globalizing State: A Future-Oriented Perspective on the Public/Private Distinction, Federalism, and Democracy,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 31 (1998), 769–870Google Scholar

American Bar Association, Model Code of Professional Responsibility (1981)

American Bar Association, House of Delegates, Model Rules of Professional Conduct (Chicago, IL: American Bar Association Center for Professional Responsibility, 1994 edn)

American Bar Association Commission on Opportunities for Minorities in the Profession, Miles to Go: Progress of Minorities in the Legal Profession (Chicago, IL: American Bar Association, http://www.abanet.org/minorities/home.html, 1998)

Appelbaum, Richard P., William, L. F. Felstiner, and Gessner, Volkmar (eds.), Rules and Networks: The Legal Culture of Global Business Transactions (Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 2001)Google Scholar

Ashford, Nicholas A., Crisis in the Workplace: Occupational Disease and Injury (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1976)Google Scholar

Ashford, Nicholas A., Ryan, C. William, and Charles, C. Caldart, “A Hard Look at Federal Regulation of Formaldehyde: A Departure from Reasoned Decisionmaking,” Harvard Environmental Law Review 7 (1983), 297–370Google Scholar

Auerbach, Carl A., “Legal Education and Its Discontents,” Journal of Legal Education 34 (1984), 73–6Google Scholar

Auerbach, Carl A., Hurst, Willard, Lloyd, K. Garrison, and Mermin, Samuel, The Legal Process: An Introduction to Decision Making by Judicial, Legislative, Executive, and Administrative Agencies (San Francisco, CA: Chandler Publishing Co., 1961)Google Scholar

Auerbach, Jerold S., Unequal Justice: Lawyers and Social Change in Modern America (New York NY: Oxford University Press, 1976)Google Scholar

Ayres, Ian and Braithwaite, John, Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Bardach, Eugene and Robert, A. Kagan, Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1982)Google Scholar

Barrow, Deborah J. and Thomas, G. Walker, A Court Divided: The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the Politics of Judicial Reform (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, David A., Lawyers and Citizens: The Making of a Political Elite in Old Regime France (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Bernstein, Marver, Regulating Business by Independent Commission (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Julia, “Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a ‘Post-Regulatory’ World,” Current Legal Problems 54 (2001), 103–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Julia, “New Institutionalism and Naturalism in Socio-Legal Analysis: Institutionalist Approaches to Regulatory Decision Making,” Law and Policy 19 (1997), 51–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Julia, “Proceduralizing Regulation: Part I,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (2000), 597–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Julia, “Proceduralizing Regulation: Part II,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (2001), 33–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Julia, “Regulatory Conversations,” Journal of Law and Society 29 (2002), 163–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobbitt, Philip, “Is Law Politics?” Stanford Law Review 41 (1989), 1233–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boissevain, Jeremy, Friends of Friends: Networks, Manipulators and Coalitions (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974)Google Scholar

Bokat, Stephen A. and Thompson, Horace A. III (eds.), Occupational Safety and Health Law (Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs, 1988)Google Scholar

Bor, Victoria L. and Feitshans, Ilise Levy (eds.), Occupational Safety and Health Law: 1995 Cumulative Supplement (Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs, 1995)Google Scholar

Bowers, Edwin, “Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Legal Professional,” Job Safety & Health Quarterly 3 (Fall 1991), 21Google Scholar

Braithwaite, John, “Enforced Self-Regulation: A New Strategy for Corporate Crime Control,” Michigan Law Review 80 (1982), 1466–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braithwaite, John, To Punish or Persuade: Enforcement of Coal Mine Safety (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1985)

Breyer, Stephen, Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Breyer, Stephen, “Judicial Review of Questions of Law and Policy,” Administrative Law Review 38 (1987), 363–98Google Scholar

Brigham, John, The Constitution of Interests: Beyond the Politics of Rights (New York, NY: New York University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Brown, Charles, Hamilton, James, and Medoff, James, Employers Large and Small (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Brown, George H., “Environmental Lawyers and the Public Interest: A Response to David Dana,” Oregon Law Review 74 (1995), 85–98Google Scholar

Brown, Richard, “Theory and Practice of Regulatory Enforcement: Occupational Health and Safety Regulation in British Columbia,” Law and Policy 16 (1994), 63–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryner, Gary C., Bureaucratic Discretion: Law and Policy in Federal Regulatory Agencies (New York: Pergamon Press, 1987)Google Scholar

Burley, Anne-Marie and Mattli, Walter, “Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration,” International Organization 47 (1993), 41–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, Maureen, “The Symbol Traders,” in Cain, Maureen and Christine, B. Harrington (eds.), Lawyers in a Postmodern World: Translation and Transgression (New York, NY: New York University Press, 1994), 15–48Google Scholar

Cain, Maureen and Christine, B. Harrington (eds.), Lawyers in a Postmodern World: Translation and Transgression (New York, NY: New York University Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Carle, Susan D., “Elites, Ethics, and the Public Good: Race, Class, and Legal Ethics in the Early NAACP,” Law and History Review 20 (2002), 97–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlin, Jerome E., Lawyers' Ethics: A Survey of the New York City Bar (New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 1966)Google Scholar

Carruthers, Bruce G. and Terence, C. Halliday, Rescuing Business: The Making of Corporate Bankruptcy Law in England and the United States (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Carson, K. and Johnstone, Richard, “The Dupes of Hazard: Occupational Health and Safety and the Victorian Sanctions Debate,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology 26 (1990), 126–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cherrington, David R., “The Race to the Courthouse: Conflicting Views Toward the Judicial Review of Occupational Safety and Health Administration Standards,” Brigham Young University Law Review (1994), 95–128Google Scholar

Chubb, John E. and Paul, E. Peterson (eds.), Can the Government Govern? (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1989)Google Scholar

Clayton, Cornell W. (ed.), Government Lawyers: The Federal Legal Bureaucracy and Presidential Politics (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1995)Google Scholar

Clune, William H. III, “A Political Model of Implementation and Implications of the Model for Public Policy, Research, and the Changing Roles of Law and Lawyers,” Iowa Law Review 69 (1983), 47–125Google Scholar

Coffee, John C. Jr., “‘No Soul to Damn: No Body to Kick’: An Unscandalized Inquiry into the Problem of Corporate Punishment,” Michigan Law Review 79 (1981), 386–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coglianese, Cary, “Assessing Consensus: The Promise and Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking,” Duke Law Journal 46 (1997), 1255–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coglianese, Cary, “Challenging the Rules: Litigation and Bargaining in the Administrative State,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan (1994)

Coglianese, Cary, “Litigating within Relationships: Disputes and Disturbance in the Regulatory Process,” Law and Society Review 30 (1996), 735–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conley, John M. and William, M. O'Barr, Just Words: Law, Language, and Power (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Crews, Jr., Clyde Wayne, “Ten Thousand Commandments: An Annual Snapshot of the Federal Regulatory State” (Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 2003: available at http://www.cato.org/tech/pubs/10kc_2002.pdf)

Crier, Catherine, The Case Against Lawyers (New York, NY: Broadway, 2002)Google Scholar

Curren, Barbara A. and Clara, N. Carson, The Lawyer Statistical Report: The US Legal Profession in the 1990s (Chicago, IL: American Bar Foundation, 1994)Google Scholar

Daicoff, Susan, “Lawyer, Know Thyself: A Review of Empirical Research on Attorney Attributes Bearing on Professionalism,” American University Law Review 46 (1997), 1337–1427Google Scholar

Daintith, Terence C., “A Regulatory Space Agency?” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 9 (1989), 534–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dana, David, “Environmental Lawyers and the Public Service Model of Lawyering,” Oregon Law Review 74 (1995), 57–83Google Scholar

Davis, Ann, “Big Jump in Minority Associates, But …” National Law Journal (April 29, 1996), 1Google Scholar

de Bruijn, Johan A. and Ernst F. ten Heuvelhof, “Policy Networks and Governance,” in David, L. Weimer (ed.), Institutional Design (Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995)Google Scholar

Dezalay, Yves, “The Forum Should Fit the Fuss: The Economics and Politics of Negotiated Justice,” in Cain, Maureen and Christine, B. Harrington (eds.), Lawyers in a Postmodern World: Translation and Transgression (New York, NY: New York University Press, 1994), 155–82Google Scholar

Dobbin, Frank and John, R. Sutton, “The Strength of a Weak State: The Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resources Management Divisions,” American Journal of Sociology 104 (1998), 441–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodge, Emily P., “Evolution of a City Law Office,” Wisconsin Law Review 40 (1956), 35–56Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony, Inside Bureaucracy (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Driscoll, Dawn-Marie, , W. Michael Hoffman, and Joseph, E. Murphy, “Business Ethics and Compliance: What Management is Doing and Why,” Business and Society Review 99 (1998), 35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenstein, James, Roy, B. Flemming, and Peter, F. Nardulli, The Contours of Justice: Communities and Their Courts (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Co., 1988)Google Scholar

Eisenstein, James and Jacob, Herbert, Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Co., 1977)Google Scholar

Eisner, Marc Allen, Regulatory Politics in Transition (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Elliot, E. Donald Jr., “The Dis-Integration of Administrative Law: A Comment on Shapiro,” Yale Law Journal 92 (1983), 1523–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs, et al., “Glass Ceilings and Open Doors: Women's Advancement in the Legal Profession,” Fordham Law Review 64 (1995), 291Google Scholar

Fiorino, Daniel J., “Regulatory Negotiation as a Policy Process,” Public Administration Review 48 (1988), 764–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, Elizabeth and Schmidt, Patrick, “Seeing the ‘Blind Spots’ in Administrative Law: Theory, Practice, and Rulemaking Settlements in the United States,” Common Law World Review 30 (2001), 348–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiss, Owen M., “Against Settlement,” Yale Law Journal 93 (1984), 1073–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flemming, Roy B., Poter, F. Nardulli, and Eisenstein, James, The Craft of Justice: Politics and Work in Criminal Court Communities (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flood, John A., “Anatomy of Lawyering: An Ethnography of a Corporate Law Firm,” Ph.D thesis, Northwestern University (1987)

Foster, James C., The Ideology of Apolitical Politics: Elite Lawyers' Response to the Legitimation Crisis of American Capitalism, 1870–1920 (New York, NY: Garland, 1990)Google Scholar

Frantz, Douglas and McKean, David, Friends in High Places: The Rise and Fall of Clark Clifford (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, & Co., 1995)Google Scholar

Freeman, Jody, “Collaborative Governance,” UCLA Law Review 45 (1997), 1–98Google Scholar

Freeman, Jody, “The Private Role in Public Governance,” New York University Law Review 75 (2000), 543–675Google Scholar

Freeman, Jody and Laura, I. Langbein, “Regulatory Negotiation and the Legitimacy Benefit,” New York University Environmental Law Journal 9 (2000), 60–151Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence M., Total Justice (New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 1985)Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence M. and Ladinsky, Jack, “Social Change and the Law of Industrial Accidents,” Columbia Law Review 67 (1967), 50–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaba, Jeffrey M., “Informal Rulemaking by Settlement Agreement,” Georgetown Law Journal 73 (1985), 1241–82Google Scholar

Gais, Thomas L., Mark, A. Peterson and Jack, L. Walker, “Interest Groups, Iron Triangles and Representative Institutions in American National Government,” British Journal of Political Science 14 (1984), 161–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galanter, Marc, “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” Law and Society Review 9 (1974), 95–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galanter, Marc and Palay, Thomas, Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1991)Google Scholar

Galligan, Denis, “Authoritarianism in Government and Administration: The Promise of Administrative Justice,” Current Legal Problems 54 (2001), 79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galligan, Denis, Discretionary Powers: A Legal Study of Official Discretion (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1986)

Geradin, Damien and Nicolas Petit, “The Development of Agencies at EU and National Levels: Conceptual Analysis and Proposals for Reform,” Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper No. 01/04 (http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/04/040101.html) (2004)

Gersuny, Carl, Work Hazards and Industrial Conflict (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1981)Google Scholar

Gibeaut, John, “Marking a Decade of Struggle,” American Bar Association Journal 83 (October 1997), 100Google Scholar

Gifford, Daniel J., “Federal Administrative Law Judges: The Relevance of Past Choices to Future Directions,” Administrative Law Review 49 (1997), 1–60Google Scholar

Gilboy, Janet A., “Regulatory and Administrative Agency Behavior: Accommodation, Amplification, and Assimilation,” Law and Policy 17 (1995), 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilson, Ronald J., “The Devolution of the Legal Profession: A Demand Side Perspective,” Maryland Law Review 49 (1990), 869–916Google Scholar

Glendon, Mary Ann, A Nation Under Lawyers: How the Crisis in the Legal Profession is Transforming American Society (New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1994)Google Scholar

Glickstein, Howard A., “Law Schools: Where the Elite Meet to Teach,” Nova Law Journal 10 (1986), 541–6Google Scholar

Gombar, Robert C., Arthur, G. Sapper, and Melissa, A. Bailey, “Sweeping Changes in Store with Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Safety Program Standard,” Occupational Hazards 59 (May 1997), 25Google Scholar

Gordon, Robert W., “The Independence of Lawyers,” Boston University Law Review 68 (1988), 1–83Google Scholar

Goulden, Joseph C., The Superlawyers: The Small and Powerful World of the Great Washington Law Firms (New York, NY: Weybright and Talley, 1972)Google Scholar

Gourman Report: Rating of Graduate and Professional Programs in American and International Universities (Los Angeles, CA: National Education Standards, 1994)

Gräbe, Sylvia, “Regulatory Agencies and Interest Groups in Occupational Health and Safety in Great Britain and West Germany: A Perspective from West Germany,” Law and Policy 13 (1991), 55–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gramm, Wendy L., Testimony before the United States House Committee on Government Reform on H.R. 2432, the Paperwork and Regulatory Improvements Act of 2003, July 22, 2003 (available at http://www.mercatus.org/article.php/363.html)

Granfield, Robert, Making Elite Lawyers: Visions of Law at Harvard and Beyond (New York, NY: Routledge, 1992)Google Scholar

Gray, Wayne B. and John, T. Scholz, “Does Regulatory Enforcement Work? A Panel Analysis of Occupational Safety and Health Administration Enforcement,” Law and Society Review 27 (1993), 177–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, Mark J., The Other Government: The Unseen Power of Washington Lawyers (New York, NY: Grossman Publishers, 1975)Google Scholar

Gunningham, Neil, Robert, A. Kagan, and Thornton, Dorothy, Shades of Green: Business, Regulation, and Environment (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Haines, Fiona, Corporate Regulation: Beyond “Punish or Persuade” (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Hall, Clare, Scott, Colin, and Hood, Christopher, Telecommunications Regulation: Culture, Chaos and Interdependence Inside the Regulatory Process (London: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar

Ham, Christopher, Policy-making in the National Health Service: A Case Study of the Leeds Regional Hospital Board (London: Macmillan Press, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, Robert W., “The Role of Nongovernmental Standards in the Development of Mandatory Federal Standards Affecting Safety or Health,” Texas Law Review 56 (1978), 1329–1484Google Scholar

Hancher, Leigh, Regulating for Competition: Government, Law, and the Pharmaceutical Industry in the United Kingdom and France (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Hancher, Leigh and Moran, Michael (eds.), Capitalism, Culture, and Regulation (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Hanf, Kenneth and Fritz, W. Scharpf (eds.), Interorganizational Policy Making: Limits to Coordination and Central Control (London: Sage, 1978)Google Scholar

Harcourt, A. J. and Radaelli, C. M., “Limits to EU Technocratic Regulation?” European Journal of Political Research 35 (1999), 107–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harlow, Carol, Accountability in the European Union (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrington, Christine B., “Outlining a Theory of Legal Practice,” in Cain, Maureen and Christine, B. Harrington (eds.), Lawyers in a Postmodern World: Translation and Transgression (New York, NY: New York University Press, 1994), 49–69Google Scholar

Harter, Philip J., “Fear of Commitment: An Affliction of Adolescents,” Duke Law Journal 46 (1997), 1389–1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harter, Philip J., “In Search of Goldilocks: Democracy, Participation, and Government,” Penn State Environmental Law Review 10 (2002), 113–34Google Scholar

Harter, Philip J., “Negotiating Regulations: A Cure for Malaise,” Georgetown Law Journal 71 (1982), 1–118Google Scholar

Hawkins, Keith, Law as Last Resort: Prosecution Decision-Making in a Regulatory Agency (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Hawkins, Keith and Bridget, M. Hutter, “The Response of Business to Social Regulation in England and Wales: An Enforcement Perspective,” Law and Policy 15 (1993), 199–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinz, John P. and Edward, O. Laumann, Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar (New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 1982)Google Scholar

Heinz, John P. and Edward, O. Laumann, “The Constituencies of Elite Urban Lawyers,” Law and Society Review 31 (1997), 441–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinz, John P., Edward, O. Laumann, Robert, L. Nelson, and Robert, H. Salisbury, The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Heller, Jamie G., “Legal Counseling in the Administrative State: How to Let the Client Decide,” Yale Law Journal 103 (1994), 2503–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hertogh, Marc and Halliday, Simon (eds.), Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact: International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell, “The Path of the Law,” Harvard Law Review 10 (1897), 457–78Google Scholar

Hopkins, Andrew, “Social Values in Occupational Safety Law,” Legal Studies Forum 13 (1989), 135–50Google Scholar

Horowitz, Donald L., The Jurocracy: Government Lawyers, Agency Programs, and Judicial Decisions (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1977)Google Scholar

Horsky, Charles A., The Washington Lawyer (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1981 reprint, originally published 1952)Google Scholar

Hosticka, Carl J., “We Don't Care About What Happened, We Only Care About What Is Going To Happen: Lawyer–Client Negotiations of Reality,” Social Problems 26 (1979), 599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, J. Woodford Jr., Courts of Appeals in the Federal Judicial System: A Study of the Second, Fifth, and District of Columbia Circuits (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huigen, Jos, Information Supply and the Implementation of Policy: Playing with Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Policy Networks (Delft: Eburon, 1994)Google Scholar

Humphries, Martha Anne and Donald, F. Songer, “Law and Politics in Judicial Oversight of Administrative Agencies,” Journal of Politics 61 (1999), 207–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutter, Bridget M. and Lloyd-Bostock, Sally, “The Power of Accidents: The Social and Psychological Impact of Accidents and the Enforcement of Safety Regulations,” British Journal of Criminology 30 (1990), 409–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irons, Peter H., The New Deal Lawyers (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982)Google Scholar

Jasanoff, Sheila, “Science and the Limits of Administrative Rule-making: Lessons from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration Cancer Policy,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 20 (1982), 536–61Google Scholar

Johnson, George Robert Jr., “The Split-Enforcement Model: Some Conclusions From the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and Mine Safety and Health Administration Experiences,” Administrative Law Review 39 (1987), 315–51Google Scholar

Jordana, Jacint and Levi-Faur, David (eds.), The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kagan, Robert A., Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Kagan, Robert A., “Introduction: Comparing National Styles of Regulation in Japan and the United States,” Law and Policy 22 (2000), 225–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kagan, Robert A. and Axelrad, Lee (eds.), Regulatory Encounters: Multinational Corporations and American Adversarial Legalism (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Kagan, Robert A. and Rosen, Robert Eli, “On the Social Significance of Large Law Firm Practice,” Stanford Law Review 37 (1985), 399–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keleman, R. Daniel, “The Rise of Adversarial Legalism in the European Union: Beyond Policy Learning and Regulatory Competition,” in Levi-Faur, David and Eran, Vigoda-Gadot (eds.), International Public Policy and Management: Policy Learning Beyond Regional, Cultural and Political Boundaries (New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, 2004)Google Scholar

Kelman, Steven, Regulating America, Regulating Sweden: A Comparative Study of Occupational Safety and Health Policy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981)Google Scholar

Kemp, Kathleen, “Lawyers, Politics and Economic Regulation,” Social Science Quarterly 64 (1986), 267–82Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O. and Elinor Ostrom, “Introduction,” in Keohane, and Ostrom, (eds.), Local Commons and Global Interdependence: Heterogeneity and Cooperation in Two Domains (London: Sage Publications, 1995)Google Scholar

Kerwin, Cornelius M., Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy 3rd edn (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Kickert, Walter J. M., Klijn, Erik-Hans, and Joop, F. M. Koppenjan (eds.), Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector (London: Sage Publications, 1997)Google Scholar

King, Anthony (ed.), The New American Political System (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1978)Google Scholar

Klijn, Erik-Hans, “Analyzing and Managing Policy Processes in Complex Networks: A Theoretical Examination of the Concept Policy Network and Its Problems,” Administration & Society 28 (1996), 90–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knoke, David, Political Networks: The Structural Perspective (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kolko, Gabriel, The Triumph of Conservatism: A Reinterpretation of American History 1900–1916 (New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe, 1963)Google Scholar

Kovach, Kenneth A. and Hamilton, Nancy Greer, “Labor's Efforts Sustain Workplace Safety,” Labor Studies Journal 22 (1997), 57Google Scholar

Kovach, Kimberlee K., “The Lawyer as Teacher: The Role of Education in Lawyering,” Clinical Law Review 4 (1998), 359–90Google Scholar

Kritzer, Herbert M., “Adjudication to Settlement: Shading in the Gray,” Judicature 70 (1986), 161–5Google Scholar

Kritzer, Herbert M., “‘Data, Data, Data, Drowning in Data’: Crafting The Hollow Core,” Law and Social Inquiry 21 (1996), 761–804Google Scholar

Kritzer, Herbert M., The Justice Broker: Lawyers and Ordinary Litigation (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1990)

Kronman, Anthony T., The Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals in the Legal Profession (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University, 1993)Google Scholar

Landon, Donald D., Country Lawyers: The Impact of Context on Professional Practice (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1990)Google Scholar

Langbein, Laura I. and Cornelius, M. Kerwin, “Regulatory Negotiation versus Conventional Rule Making: Claims, Counterclaims, and Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (2000), 599–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laski, Harold J., The American Democracy: A Commentary and An Interpretation (New York, NY: Viking Press, 1948)Google Scholar

Lewis, Frank, “Employers' Liability,” Atlantic Monthly 103 (January 1909), 60Google Scholar

Linowitz, Sol with Mayer, Martin, The Betrayed Profession: Lawyering at the End of the Twentieth Century (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Lipartito, Kenneth, “What Have Lawyers Done for American Business? The Case of Baker & Botts of Houston,” Business History Review 64 (1990), 489–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loevinger, Lee, “A Washington Lawyer Tells What It's Like,” George Washington Law Review 38 (1970), 531–45Google Scholar

Lofgren, Don J., Dangerous Premises: An Insider's View of Occupational Safety and Health Administration Enforcement (Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Luban, David, “Settlements and the Erosion of the Public Realm,” Georgetown Law Journal 83 (1995), 2619–62Google Scholar

Macaulay, Stewart, “Business Adaptation to Regulation: What Do We Know and What Do We Need to Know?” Law and Policy 15 (1993), 259–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macaulay, Stewart, “Lawyers and Consumer Protection Laws,” Law and Society Review 14 (1979), 115–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macaulay, Stewart, “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” American Sociological Review 28 (1963), 55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico, Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Majone, Giandomenico, Regulating Europe (London, UK: Routledge, 1996)

Marin, Bernd and Mayntz, Renate (eds.), Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Consideration (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991)Google Scholar

Marinetto, Mike, “Governing beyond the Centre: A Critique of the Anglo-Governance School,” Political Studies 51 (2003), 592–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marks, Gary, Fritz, W. Scharpf, Philippe, C. Schmitter, and Streeck, Wolfgang, Governance in the European Union (London: Sage, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory (Summit, NJ: Martindale-Hubbell, 2004)

Mashaw, Jerry L., “Improving the Environment of Agency Rulemaking: An Essay on Management, Games, and Accountability,” Law and Contemporary Problems 57 (1994), 185–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mashaw, Jerry L. and David, L. Harfst, “Regulation and Legal Culture: The Case of Motor Vehicle Safety,” Yale Journal on Regulation 4 (1987), 257–316Google Scholar

McBarnet, Doreen, “Law and Capital: The Role of Legal Form and Legal Actors,” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 12 (1984), 231–8Google Scholar

McBarnet, Doreen, “Legal Creativity: Law, Capital, and Legal Avoidance,” in Cain, Maureen and Christine, B. Harrington (eds.), Lawyers in a Postmodern World: Translation and Transgression (New York, NY: New York University Press, 1994), 73–84Google Scholar

McBarnet, Doreen, and Whelan, Christopher, Creative Accounting and the Cross-eyed Javelin Thrower (Chichester: J. Wiley, 1999)Google Scholar

McCann, Michael, Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1989)Google Scholar

McGarity, Thomas O., “Some Thoughts on ‘Deossifying’ the Rulemaking Process,” Duke Law Journal 41 (1993), 1385–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGarity, Thomas O. and Sidney, A. Shapiro, Workers At Risk: The Failed Promise of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Westport, CT: Praeger Press, 1993)Google Scholar

McGuire, Kevin T., The Supreme Court Bar: Legal Elites in the Washington Community (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Meklinsky, Ian D., “What To Do When the Occupational Safety and Health Administration Inspector Knocks (Part I),” The Practical Lawyer 43 (March 1997), 63Google Scholar

Melnick, R. Shep, Regulation and the Courts: The Case of the Clean Air Act (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1983)Google Scholar

Mendlehoff, John M., The Dilemma of Toxic Substance Regulation: How Overregulation Causes Underregulation at Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988)Google Scholar

Milhaupt, Curtis J. and Geoffrey, P. Miller, “Regulatory Failure and the Collapse of Japan's Home Mortgage Lending Industry: A Legal and Economic Analysis,” Law and Policy 22 (2000), 245–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milhaupt, Curtis J. and Mark, D. West, “Law's Dominion and the Market for Legal Elites in Japan,” Law and Policy in International Business 34 (2003), 451–98Google Scholar

Mintz, Benjamin W., Occupational Safety and Health Administration: History, Law, and Policy (Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs, 1984)Google Scholar

Mitchell, Neil J., The Conspicuous Corporation: Business, Public Policy and Representative Democracy (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moe, Terry M., “Control and Feedback in Economic Regulation: The Case of the National Labor Relations Board,” American Political Science Review 79 (1985), 1094–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morag-Levine, Noga, Chasing the Wind: Regulating Air Pollution in the Common Law State (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Moran, John B., Kojola, Bill, and Melius, James, “Asphalt Paving Exposure Controls: A Model for the Future?” Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 12 (1997), 407–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moran, Michael, “Understanding the Regulatory State,” British Journal of Political Science 32 (2002), 391–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, Bronwen, Social Citizenship in the Shadow of Competition: The Bureaucratic Politics of Regulatory Justif ication (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Mullan, David and Ceddia, Antonella, “The Impact on Public Law of Privatization, Deregulation, Outsourcing, and Downsizing: A Canadian Perspective,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 10 (2003), 199–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nader, Ralph and Green, Mark (eds.), Verdicts on Lawyers (New York, NY: Cromwell, 1976)Google Scholar

Nader, Ralph and Wesley, J. Smith, No Contest: Corporate Lawyers and the Perversion of Justice in America (New York, NY: Random House, 1996)Google Scholar

Nelson, Robert L., “The Futures of American Lawyers: A Demographic Profile of a Changing Profession in a Changing Society,” Case Western Reserve Law Review 44 (1994), 345–406Google Scholar

Nelson, Robert L. and John, P. Heinz, with Edward, O. Laumann and Robert, H. Salisbury, “Lawyers and the Structure of Influence in Washington,” Law and Society Review 22 (1988), 237–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, Robert L. and David M. Trubek, “Arenas of Professionalism: The Professional Ideologies of Lawyers in Context,” in Nelson, Trubek, and Rayman, L. Solomon (eds.), Lawyers' Ideals/Lawyers' Practices: Transformations in the American Legal Profession (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Nelson, William E., “Contract Litigation and the Elite Bar in New York City, 1960–1980,” Emory Law Journal 39 (1990), 413–62Google Scholar

Nichols, Albert L. and Zeckhauser, Richard, “Government Comes to the Workplace: An Assessment of Occupational Safety and Health Administration,” Public Interest 49 (1977), 39–69Google Scholar

Noble, Charles, Liberalism at Work: The Rise and Fall of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1986)Google Scholar

Note, , “Growing the Carrot: Encouraging Effective Corporate Compliance,” Harvard Law Review 109 (1996), 1783–1800Google Scholar

O'Brien, David, “Administrative Discretion, Judicial Review, and Regulatory Politics,” in Douglas, H. Shumavon and Hibbeln, H. Kenneth (eds.), Administrative Discretion and Public Policy Implementation (New York, NY: Praeger, 1986)Google Scholar

The Official Guide to US Law Schools 1998–99 (Newtown, PA: Law School Admission Services, 1998)

Olson, Mancur, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971)Google Scholar

Olson, Susan M., Clients and Lawyers: Securing the Rights of Disabled Persons (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1984)Google Scholar

Olson, Walter K., The Rule of Lawyers: How the New Litigation Elite Threatens America's Rule of Law (New York, NY: Truman Talley, 2003)Google Scholar

Orts, Eric and Deketelaere, Kurt (eds.), Environmental Contracts: Comparative Approaches to Regulatory Innovation in the United States and Europe (Boston, MA: Kluwer Law International, 2001)Google Scholar

Parker, Christine, The Open Corporation: Effective Self-regulation and Democracy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierce, Richard J. Jr., “Judicial Review of Agency Actions in a Period of Diminishing Agency Resources,” Administrative Law Review 49 (1997), 61–94Google Scholar

Pierce, Richard J. Jr., “Small is Not Beautiful: The Case Against Special Regulatory Treatment of Small Firms,” Administrative Law Review 50 (1998), 537–78Google Scholar

Pierce, Richard J. Jr., “The Unintended Effects of Judicial Review of Agency Rules: How Federal Courts Have Contributed to the Electricity Crisis of the 1990s,” Administrative Law Review 43 (1991), 7–29Google Scholar

Pierre, Jon and Peters, B. Guy, Governance, Politics and the State (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000)Google Scholar

Plotke, David, “The Political Mobilization of Business,” in Mark, P. Petracca (ed.), The Politics of Interests: Interest Groups Transformed (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Powell, Michael J., From Patrician to Professional Elite: The Transformation of the New York City Bar Association (New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 1988)Google Scholar

Prosser, Tony, Law and the Regulators (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Quigley, Thomas E., “Employee Involvement in the Occupational Safety and Health Administration Settlement Process,” Detroit College of Law Review (1990), 579–97Google Scholar

Quirk, Paul J., Industry Influence in Federal Regulatory Agencies (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rabinowitz, Randy S., Occupational Safety and Health Law, 2nd edn (Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs, 2002)Google Scholar

Railton, W. Scott, Occupational Safety and Health Administration Compliance Handbook (Rockford, MD: Government Institutes, Inc., 1992)Google Scholar

Rees, Joseph V., Reforming the Workplace: A Study of Self-Regulation in Occupational Safety (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1986)Google Scholar

Reich, Robert B., Locked in the Cabinet (New York: Vintage, 1998)Google Scholar

Reich, Robert B., “Regulation by Confrontation or Negotiation?” Harvard Business Review 59 (May–June 1981), 82–93Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. W., The National World of Local Government (London: Allen and Unwin, 1986)Google Scholar

Riles, Annelise, The Network Inside Out (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robertson, Leon S. and Keeve, J. Philip, “Worker Injuries: The Effects of Workers' Compensation and Occupational Safety and Health Administration Inspections,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law 8 (1983), 581–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, Glen O., American Bureaucracy: Public Choice and Public Law (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1991)Google Scholar

Rossi, Jim, “Bargaining in the Shadow of Administrative Procedure: The Public Interest in Rulemaking Settlement,” Duke Law Journal 51 (2001), 1015–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothstein, Mark A., “Occupational Safety and Health Administration After Ten Years: A Review and Some Proposed Reforms,” Vanderbilt Law Review 34 (1980), 71–139Google Scholar

Ruhl, J. B. and Salzman, James, “Mozart and the Red Queen: The Problem of Regulatory Accretion in the Administrative State,” Georgetown Law Journal 91 (2003), 757–850Google Scholar

Ryan, Mike H., Corporate Strategy, Public Policy, and the Fortune 500: How America's Major Corporations Influence Government (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987)Google Scholar

Sarat, Austin and William, F. Felstiner, Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients: Power and Meaning in the Legal Process (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Schmidt, Patrick, “Let's (Not) Kill All the Lawyers: Corporate Regulatory Compliance and Attorneys' Divided Roles,” Business and Society Review 105 (2000), 269–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, Patrick, “Pursuing Regulatory Relief: Strategic Participation and Litigation in US Occupational Safety and Health Administration Rulemaking,” Business and Politics 4 (2002), 71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneyer, Ted, “Fuzzy Models of the Corporate Lawyer as Environmental Compliance Counselor,” Oregon Law Review 74 (1995), 99–119Google Scholar

Schoenbrod, David, Power Without Responsibility: How Congress Abuses the People Through Delegation (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Scholz, John T., “Cooperative Regulatory Enforcement and the Politics of Administrative Effectiveness,” American Political Science Review 85 (1991), 115–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scholz, John T. and Wayne, B. Gray, “Can Government Facilitate Cooperation? An Informational Model of Occupational Safety and Health Administration Enforcement,” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1997), 693–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, Colin, “Analysing Regulatory Space: Fragmented Resources and Institutional Design,” Public Law (Summer 2001), 329–53Google Scholar

Shamir, Ronen, Managing Legal Uncertainty: Elite Lawyers in the New Deal (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Shapiro, Martin and Sweet, Alec Stone, On Law, Politics, and Judicialization (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Sidney A., “Substantive Reform, Judicial Review, and Agency Resources: Occupational Safety and Health Administration as a Case Study,” Administrative Law Review 49 (1997), 645–70Google Scholar

Shapiro, Sidney A. and Thomas, O. McGarity, “Not So Paradoxical: The Rationale for Technology-Based Regulation,” Duke Law Journal (1991), 729–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Sidney A. and Thomas, O. McGarity, “Reorienting Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Regulatory Alternatives and Legislative Reform,” Yale Journal on Regulation 6 (1989), 1–63Google Scholar

Shapiro, Sidney A. and Randy, S. Rabinowitz, “Punishment Versus Cooperation in Regulatory Enforcement,” Administrative Law Review 49 (1997), 703–37Google Scholar

Shapiro, Susan P., Wayward Capitalists: Target of the Securities and Exchange Commission (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1984)Google Scholar

Sikkink, Kathryn, “Human Rights, Principle Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America,” International Organization 47 (1993), 411–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, William H., “Ethical Discretion in Lawyering,” Harvard Law Review 101 (1988), 1083–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, William H., “The Ideology of Advocacy: Procedural Justice and Professional Ethics,” Wisconsin Law Review (1978), 29–144Google Scholar

Simon, William H., “Judicial Clerkships and Elite Professional Culture,” Journal of Legal Education 36 (1986), 129–37Google Scholar

Simpson, Sally S., Corporate Crime, Law, and Social Control (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, “The Accountability of Government Networks,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 8 (2001), 347–67Google Scholar

Smigel, Erwin O., The Wall Street Lawyer (Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press, 1964)Google Scholar

Stanley, Harold W. and Richard, G. Niemi, Vital Statistics on American Politics, 1997–1998 (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, 1997)Google Scholar

Stern, Stephanie, “Cognitive Consistency: Theory Maintenance and Administrative Rulemaking,” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 63 (2002), 589–644Google Scholar

Stewart, Richard B., “The Discontents of Legalism: Interest Group Relations in Administrative Regulation,” Wisconsin Law Review (1985), 655–86Google Scholar

Stewart, Richard B., “The Reformation of American Administrative Law,” Harvard Law Review 88 (1975), 1669–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, Christopher D., Where the Law Ends: The Social Control of Corporate Behavior (New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1975)Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, Alec, Sandholtz, Wayne, and Fligstein, Neil (eds.), The Institutionalization of Europe (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strange, Susan, The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suchman, Mark C. and Mia, L. Cahill, “The Hired Gun as Facilitator: Lawyers and the Suppression of Business Disputes in Silicon Valley,” Law and Social Inquiry 21 (1996), 679–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teubner, Gunther, Law as an Autopoietic System (Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1993)Google Scholar

Thatcher, Mark and Sweet, Alec Stone (eds.), The Politics of Delegation (London, UK: Frank Cass, 2003)Google Scholar

US Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstracts of the United States (Washington, DC, 1997

US Department of Labor, “Framework for the use of Negotiated Rulemaking in the Department of Labor” (http://www.dol.gov/asp/programs/negreg/nrbprta.htm)

US Department of Labor, “Occupational Safety and Health Administration Inspections”, pamphlet (2002, revised)

US Department of Labor, Twenty Years of Occupational Safety and Health Administration Federal Enforcement Data: A Review and Explanation of the Major Trends (Washington, DC: January 1993)

Waarden, Frans, “Dimensions and Types of Policy Networks,” European Journal of Political Research 21 (1992), 29–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vanderbergh, Michael P., “Beyond Elegance: A Testable Typology of Social Norms in Corporate Environmental Compliance,” Stanford Environmental Law Journal 22 (2003), 55–144Google Scholar

Verkuil, Paul, “Rulemaking Ossification – A Modest Proposal,” Administrative Law Review 47 (1995), 453–9Google Scholar

Weil, David, “Building Safety: The Role of Construction Unions in the Enforcement of Occupational Safety and Health Administration,” Journal of Labor Research 13 (1992), 121–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingast, Barry R. and Mark, J. Moran, “Bureaucratic Discretion or Congressional Control: Regulatory Policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission,” Journal of Political Economy 91 (1984), 765–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westwood, Howard C., “The Influence of Washington Lawyering,” George Washington Law Review 38 (1970), 607–18Google Scholar

White, G. Edward, “Felix Frankfurter, the Old Boy Network, and the New Deal: The Placement of Elite Lawyers in Public Service in the 1930s,” Arkansas Law Review 39 (1986), 631–67Google Scholar

Whiting, Basil J., “Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Enforcement Policy,” Labor Law Journal 31 (1980), 259–82Google Scholar

Wilkinson, Margaret Ann, Mercer, Peter and Strong, Terra, “Mentor, Mercenary or Melding: An Empirical Inquiry into the Role of the Lawyer,” Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal 28 (1996), 373–418Google Scholar

Wilks, Stephen R. M. and Wright, Maurice (eds.), Comparative Government–Industry Relations: Western Europe, the United States, and Japan (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987)Google Scholar

Williams, David B. and Gulati, G. Mitu, “Why Are There So Few Black Lawyers in Corporate Law Firms? An Institutional Analysis,” California Law Review 84 (1996), 493–625Google Scholar

Wood, B. Dan, “Principles, Bureaucrats, and Responsiveness in Clean Air Enforcement,” American Political Science Review 82 (1988), 213–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, B. Dan and James, B. Anderson, “The Politics of US Antitrust Regulation,” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1993), 1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Worsham, Jeff, Eisner, Marc Allen, and Evan, J. Ringquist, “Assessing the Assumptions: A Critical Analysis of Agency Theory,” Administration & Society 28 (1997), 419–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

“Control of Hazardous Energy Sources (Lockout/Tagout): Final Rule. Supplemental Statement of Reasons,” Federal Register 58 (March 30, 1993), 16612–23

“Control of Hazardous Energy Sources (Lockout/Tagout); Machinery, Equipment Maintenance: Final Rule,” Federal Register 54 (September 1, 1989), 36644–90

“The Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout): Notice of the Availability of a Lookback Review Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive Order 12866,” Federal Register 65 (June 20, 2000), 38302–4

“The Control of Hazardous Energy Sources (Lockout/Tagout): Proposed Rule,” Federal Register 53 (April 29, 1988), 15496–528

“Corrections and Technical Amendments to the Final Rule on Control of Hazardous Energy Sources (Lockout/Tagout),” Federal Register 55 (September 20, 1990), 38677–88

“Electric Power Generation, Transmission, and Distribution: Electrical Protective Equipment: Final Rule,” Federal Register 59 (January 31, 1994), 4320–476

“Electrical Standards for Construction: Final Rule,” Federal Register 51 (July 11, 1986), 25294–335

“Notice of Public Meeting on Review of the Control of Hazardous Energy Sources (Lockout/Tagout) Standard (29 CFR 1910.147),” Federal Register 62 (May 29, 1997), 29089–90

Barstow, David and Bergman, Lowell, “Deaths on the Job, Slaps on the Wrist,” New York Times, January 10, 2003, p. A15Google Scholar

“Compliance Program Draws Criticism, Advice. Inspections as Sanctions Raise Attorneys' Ire,” Occupational Safety and Health Reporter 27 (March 18, 1998), 1486–7

“DeCoster Got Caught In Net After Enforcers Changed Their Approach,” Maine Sunday Telegraph, July 8, 1996, pp. 1A, 12A

“Firms That Deny Occupational Safety and Health Administration Entry Draw Higher Fines, Cited For More Alleged Violations, Study Shows,” Occupational Safety and Health Reporter 23 (February 23, 1994), 1275

General Accounting Office, “Occupational Safety and Health: Penalties for Violations Are Well Below Maximum Allowable Penalties,” April 6, 1992, p. 6

“Hudson Foods Has ‘Long History’ of Safety, Health Violations, Occupational Safety and Health Administration Says,” Washington Post, August 23, 1997, p. A11

“Memo from Joseph A. Dear, Assistant Secretary and Thomas A. Williamson, Jr., Solicitor of Labor, regarding Enforcement Litigation Strategy,” March 24, 1995, published in Occupational Safety and Health Reporter 24 (April 5, 1995), 2218

“Most Employers, Workers Satisfied with Occupational Safety and Health Administration Inspections, Survey Discovers,” Occupational Safety and Health Reporter 24 (January 25, 1995), 1723

“Muffed Mission: Labor Secretary's Bid to Push Plant Safety Runs Into Skepticism,” Wall Street Journal, August 19, 1994, p. A1

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, Guide to Review Commission Procedures (November 1997)

“Occupational Safety and Health Administration Admits to Ad Hoc Settlement Policy. Scant Oversight,” Inside Occupational Safety and Health Administration (April 7, 1997), 3

“Special Report: Occupational Safety and Health Administration Settlement Agreements,” BNA Occupational Safety and Health Administration 27 (July 23, 1997), 244