Abbot, Kenneth W., “Modern International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers,” 14 Yale J. Int'l L.335 (1989)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “The System for Exploitation of the ‘Common Heritage of Mankind’ at the Caracas Conference,” 69 Am. J. Int'l L.31 (1975)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “Settlement of Disputes Arising under the Law of the Sea Convention,” 69 Am. J. Int'l L.795 (1975)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “Settlement of Disputes Arising under the Law of the Sea Convention,” 71 Am. J. Int'l L.305 (1977)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “Prolegomena to the Dispute Settlement Part of the Law of the Sea Convention,” 10 NYU J Int'l L & PoL.253 (1977–78)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “Settlement of Disputes Arising under the Law of the Sea Convention,” 72 Am. J. Int'l L.84 (1978)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “Toward the Formulation of the Rule of Delimitation of Sea Boundaries between States with Opposite or Adjacent Coasts,” 19 Va. J. Int'l L.209 (1978–79)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “Streamlining the System for Settlement of Disputes under the Law of the Sea Convention,” 1 Pace L. Rev.15 (1980)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “Environmental Disputes under the Law of the Sea Convention,” 7 Envtl. Pol'y & L.63 (1981)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “The Basic Structure of the Disputes Settlement Part of the Law of the Sea Convention,” 11 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.125 (1982)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., The System for Settlement of Disputes Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1987)

Alexander, Lewis M., “International Straits,” in 64 International Law Studies: The Law of Naval Operations (Horace B. Robertson ed., 1991), p. 91

Anand, R. P., “The Politics of a New Legal Order for Fisheries,” 11 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.265 (1982)Google Scholar

Astley, John III, and Schmitt, Michael N., “The Law of the Sea and Naval Operations,” 42 Air Force L. Rev.119 (1997)Google Scholar

Attard, David Joseph, The Exclusive Economic Zone in International Law (1987)

Banks, Susan M., “Protection of Investment in Deep Seabed Mining: Does the United States have a Viable Alternative to Participation in UNCLOS?,” 2 Boston Univ. Int'l L. J.267 (1983)Google Scholar

Barkenbus, J., Deep Seabed Resources (1979)

Bergman, Mark S., “The Regulation of Seabed Mining Under the Reciprocating States Regime,” 30 Am. Univ. L. Rev.477 (1981)Google Scholar

Bernhardt, J. P. A., “Compulsory Dispute Settlement in the Law of the Sea Negotiations: A Reassessment,” 19 Va. J. Int'l L.69 (1978–79)Google Scholar

Bernhardt, J. P. A., “The Right of Archipelagic Sea Lanes Passage: A Primer,” 35 Va. J. Int'l L.719 (1995)Google Scholar

Bilder, R. B., “Some Limitations of Adjudication as a Dispute Settlement Technique,” 23 Va. J. Int'l L.1 (1982–83)Google Scholar

Birnie, Patricia, “Law of the Sea and Ocean Resources: Implications for Marine Scientific Research,” 10 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.229 (1995)Google Scholar

Bishop, William W. Jr., “International Law Commission Draft Articles on Fisheries,” 50 Am. J. Int'l L.627 (1956)Google Scholar

Blum, Yehuda Z., “The Gulf of Sidra Incident,” 80 Am. J. Int'l L.668 (1986)Google Scholar

Boggs, S. Whittemore, “Delimitation of the Territorial Sea: The Method of Delimitation Proposed by the Delegation of the United States at the Hague Conference for the Codification of International Law,” 24 Am. J. Int'l L.541 (1930)Google Scholar

Boggs, S. Whittemore, “Problems of Water-Boundary Definition: Median Line and International Boundaries Through Territorial Waters,” 27 Geographical Rev.445 (1937)Google Scholar

Booth, Kenneth, “The Military Implications of the Changing Law of the Sea,” in Law of the Sea: Neglected Issues 328 (John King Gamble, Jr., ed., 1979)

Bouchez, L. J., The Regime of Bays in International Law (1964)

Bowett, D. W., “The Second United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea,” 9 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.415 (1960)Google Scholar

Boyle, A. E., “Problems of Compulsory Jurisdiction and the Settlement of Disputes Relating to Straddling Fish Stocks,” 14 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.1 (1999)Google Scholar

Boyle, Alan E., “Marine Pollution under the Law of the Sea Convention,” 79 Am. J. Int'l L.347 (1985)Google Scholar

Boyle, Alan E., “Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction,” 46 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.37 (1997)Google Scholar

Boyle, Alan E., “UNCLOS, the Marine Environment and the Settlement of Disputes,” in Competing Norms in the Law of Marine Environmental Protection – Focus on Ship Safety and Pollution Prevention (Henrik Ringbom ed., 1997), p. 241

Boyle, Francis Anthony, Foundations of World Order: The Legalist Approach to International Relations, 1898–1922 (1999)

Bozcek, Boleslaw A., “Peacetime Military Activities in the Exclusive Economic Zones of Third Countries,” 19 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.445 (1988)Google Scholar

Bozcek, Boleslaw A., “Peaceful Purposes Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 20 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.359 (1989)Google Scholar

Breen, James H., “The 1982 Dispute Resolving Agreement: The First Step Toward Unilateral Mining Outside the Law of the Sea Convention,” 14 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.201 (1984)Google Scholar

Brewer, William C., “Deep Seabed Mining: Can An Acceptable Regime Ever be Found?,” 11 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.25 (1982)Google Scholar

Briggs, Herbert W., “The Optional Protocols of Geneva (1958) and Vienna (1961, 1963) Concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes,” in Recueil D'études de Droit International: en Hommage à Paul Gugenheim (1968), p. 628

Brilmayer, Lea and Klein, Natalie, “Land and Sea: Two Sovereignty Regimes in Search of a Common Denominator,” 33 NYU J. Int'l L & PoL.703 (2001)Google Scholar

Broadus, J. M., and Hoagland, III, Porter, “Conflict Resolution in the Assignment of Area Entitlements for Seabed Mining,” 21 San Diego L. Rev.541 (1984)Google Scholar

Brooke, Robert L. “The Current Status of Deep Seabed Mining,” 24 Va. J. Int'l L.361 (1984)Google Scholar

Brown, E. D., and Churchill, R. R., eds., The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: Impact and Implementation (1989)

Brown, E. D., “Dispute settlement and the law of the sea: the UN Convention regime,” 21 Marine Pol'y 17 (1997)Google Scholar

Brown, E. D., “The M/V ‘Saiga’ case on prompt release of detained vessels: the first Judgment of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” 22 Marine Pol'y307 (1998)Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, “The Relation of Law and Power,” in Contemporary Problems of International Law: Essays in Honour of Georg Schwarzenberger (Bin Cheng and E. D. Brown eds., 1988), p. 19

Brownlie, Ian, “The Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes in Practice,” 7 Pace Int'l L. Rev.257 (1995)Google Scholar

Brus, Marcel M. T. A., Third Party Dispute Settlement in an Interdependent World (1995)

Burke, Karin M., and DeLeo, Deborah A., “Innocent Passage and Transit Passage in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 9 Yale J. World Pub. Ord.389 (1983)Google Scholar

Burke, William T., “Some Comments on the 1958 Conventions,” in Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its Fifty-Third Annual Meeting, April 30–May 2, 1959 (1959), p. 197

Burke, William T., “National Legislation on Ocean Authority Zones and the Contemporary Law of the Sea,” 9 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.289 (1981)Google Scholar

Burke, William T., “Exclusive Fisheries Zones and Freedom of Navigation,” 20 San Diego L. Rev.595 (1983)Google Scholar

Burke, William T., “The Law of the Sea Convention Provisions on Conditions of Access to Fisheries Subject to National Jurisdiction,” 63 Oregon L. Rev.73 (1984)Google Scholar

Burke, William T., The New International Law of Fisheries: UNCLOS 1982 and Beyond (1994)

Burke, William T., “Implications for Fisheries Management of U.S. Acceptance of the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 89 Am. J. Int'l L.792 (1995)Google Scholar

Burke, William T., International Law of the Sea: Documents and Notes (1995)

Burke, William T., “Evolution in the Fisheries Provisions of UNCLOS,” in Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda (N. Ando et al. eds., 2002), p. 1355

Buzan, Barry, Seabed Politics (1976)

Buzan, Barry, “Naval Power, the Law of the Sea, and the Indian Ocean as a Zone of Peace,” 5 Marine Pol'y194 (1981)Google Scholar

Carlston, Kenneth S., The Process of International Arbitration (1946)

Carlston, Kenneth S., “Codification of International Arbitral Procedure,” 47 Am. J. Int'l L.218 (1955)Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, International Law in a Divided World (1986)

Castañeda, Jorge, “Negotiations on the Exclusive Economic Zone at the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea,” in Essays in International Law in Honour of Judge Manfred Lachs 605 (Jerzy Makarczyk ed., 1984)

Chappell, D., “Conference on the Law of the Sea,” 1 Tasm. U. L. Rev.323 (1959)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “Ocean Boundaries between Nations: A Theory for Progress,” 78 Am. J. Int'l L.582 (1984)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “The Law of the Deep Seabed Post UNCLOS III,” 63 Oregon L. Rev.19 (1984)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “The Exclusive Economic Zone and Public International Law,” 15 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.233 (1985)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “The United States and the Revision of the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 23 Ocean Dev. Int'l L.279 (1992)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “Progress in International Maritime Boundary Delimitation Law,” 88 Am. J. Int'l L.227 (1994)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “The Marine Environment and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 28 Int'l Law. 879 (1994) [Charney, “Marine Environment”]Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “U.S. Provisional Application of the 1994 Deep Seabed Agreement,” 88 Am. J. Int'l L.705 (1994)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “Entry into Force of the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 35 Va. J. Int'l L.381 (1995)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “The Protection of the Marine Environment by the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.731 (1995) [Charney, “Protection of the Marine Environment”]Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “The Implications of Expanding International Dispute Settlement Systems: The 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 90 Am. J. Int'l L.69 (1996)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “Third Party Dispute Settlement and International Law,” 36 Colum. J. Transnat'l L.65 (1997)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “Rocks that Cannot Sustain Human Habitation,” 93 Am. J. Int'l L.863 (1999)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., and Alexander, Lewis M., International Maritime Boundaries (1996)

Cheng, Bin, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (1987)

Chinkin, Christine M., “Crisis and the Performance of International Agreements,” 7 Yale J. World Pub. Ord.177 (1981)Google Scholar

Christy, Francis T. Jr., “Transitions in the Management and Distribution of International Fisheries,” 31 Int'l Org.235 (1977)Google Scholar

Churchill, R. R., and Lowe, A. V., The Law of the Sea (1983)

Churchill, R. R., and Lowe, A. V., The Law of the Sea (3rd ed., 1999)

Clark, M. Wesley, Historic Bays and Waters: A Regime of Recent Beginnings and Continued Usage (1994)

Clingan, Thomas A., The Law of the Sea: Ocean Law and Policy (1994)

Collier, John, and Lowe, Vaughan, The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures (1999)

Colombos, C. John, The International Law of the Sea (6th ed., revised, 1967)

Colson, David A., “United States Accession to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.651 (1995)Google Scholar

Cooling Haerr, Roger, “The Gulf of Sidra,” 24 San Diego L. Rev.751 (1987)Google Scholar

Copes, P., “The Impact of UNCLOS III on Management of the World's Fisheries,” 5 Mar. Pol'y217 (1981)Google Scholar

Cory, Helen May, Compulsory Arbitration of International Disputes (1932)

Curtis, Clifton E., “The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Marine Environment: A Non-Governmental Perspective,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.739 (1995)Google Scholar

Amato, Anthony, “An Alternative to the Law of the Sea Convention,” 77 Am. J. Int'l L.281 (1983)Google Scholar

Damrosch, L. F., ed., The International Court of Justice at a Crossroads (1987)

De Mestral, A. L. C., “Compulsory Dispute Settlement in the Third United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: A Canadian Perspective,” in Contemporary Issues in International Law, Essays in Honor of Louis B. Sohn (Thomas Buergenthal ed., 1984)

Dean, Arthur H., “The Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea: What was Accomplished,” 52 Am. J. Int'l L.607 (1958)Google Scholar

Dean, Arthur H., “Achievements at the Law of the Sea Conference,” in Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its Fifty-Third Annual Meeting, April 30–May 2, 1959 (1959), p. 186

Dean, Arthur H., “The Second Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea: The Fight for Freedom of the Sea,” 54 Am. J. Int'l L.751 (1960)Google Scholar

Doran, Walter F., “An Operational Commander's Perspective on the 1982 LOS Convention,” 10 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.335 (1995)Google Scholar

Doswald-Beck, Louise ed., San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea (1995)

Duff, John Alton, “UNCLOS and the New Deep Seabed Mining Regime: The Risks of Refuting the Treaty,” 19 Suffolk Transnational L. Rev.1 (1995)Google Scholar

Dupuy, René-Jean and Vignes, Daniel, eds., A Handbook on the New Law of the Sea (1991)

Elias, T. O., “The Commission of Mediation, Conciliation and Arbitration of the Organization of African Unity,” 40 Brit. Y. B. Int'l L.336 (1964)Google Scholar

Evans, Malcolm D., Relevant Circumstances and Maritime Delimitation (1989)

Evans, Malcolm D., “Maritime Delimitation and Expanding Categories of Relevant Circumstances,” 40 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.1 (1990)Google Scholar

Evans, Malcolm D., “The Southern Bluefin Tuna Dispute: Provisional Thinking on Provisional Measures?,” 10 Y. B. Int'l Envtl L.7 (1999) [Evans, “Southern Bluefin Tuna”]Google Scholar

Evriviades, Euripides L., “The Third World's Approach to the Deep Seabed,” 11 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.201 (1982)Google Scholar

Fabra, Adriana, “The LOSC and the Implementation of the Precautionary Principle,” 10 Y.B. Int'l Envtl L.15 (1999)Google Scholar

Falk, R. A., “Realistic Horizons for International Adjudication,” 11 Va. J. Int'l L.314 (1970–71)Google Scholar

Fentress, Marvin A., “Maritime Boundary Dispute Settlement: The Nonemergence of Guiding Principles,” 15 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L.591 (1985)Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Gerald, “Some Results of the Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea: Part 1 – The Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone and Related Topics,” 8 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.73 (1959)Google Scholar

Fox, H., “States and the Undertaking to Arbitrate,” 37 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.1 (1988)Google Scholar

Francioni, Francesco, “Peacetime Use of Force, Military Activities, and the New Law of the Sea,” 18 Cornell Int'l L. J.203 (1985)Google Scholar

Franckx, Eric, “‘Reasonable Bond’ in the Practice of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” 32 Cal. W. Int'l L. J.303 (2002)Google Scholar

Franklin, Carl M., “The Law of the Sea: Some Recent Developments (With Particular Reference to the United Nations Conference of 1958),” 53 Int'l L. Studies1 (1959–60)Google Scholar

Freestone, David, “The Effective Conservation and Management of High Seas Living Resources: Towards a New Regime?,” 5 Canterbury L. Rev.341 (1994)Google Scholar

Friedham, Robert L., and Durch, William J., “The International Seabed Resources Agency Negotiations and the New International Economic Order,” 31 Int'l Org.343 (1977)Google Scholar

Friedman, A. G., and Williams, C. A., “The Group of 77 at the United Nations: An Emergent Force in the Law of the Sea,” 16 San Diego L. Rev.555 (1978–79)Google Scholar

Gaertner, Marianne P., “The Dispute Settlement Provisions of the Convention on the Law of the Sea: Critique and Alternatives to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” 19 San Diego L. Rev.577 (1982)Google Scholar

Galdorisi, George, “The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: A National Security Perspective,” 89 Am. J. Int'l L.208 (1995)Google Scholar

Galdorisi, George, “The United States Freedom of Navigation Program: A Bridge for International Compliance with the 1982 United Nations Convention on the law of the Sea,” 27 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.399 (1996)Google Scholar

Gamble, John King Jr., “The Law of the Sea Conference: Dispute Settlement in Perspective,” 9 Vand J. Int'l L.323 (1976)Google Scholar

Gamble, John King Jr., “Assessing the Reality of the Deep Seabed Regime,” 22 San Diego L. Rev.779 (1985)Google Scholar

Gamble, John King Jr., “The 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: Binding Dispute Settlement?,” 9 B. U. Int'l L.J.39 (1991)Google Scholar

Gautier, Phillipe, “Interim Measures of Protection Before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” in Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Myron H. Nordquist and John Norton Moore eds., 2001), p. 243

Gioia, Andrea, “Tunisia's Claims over Adjacent Seas and the Doctrine of ‘Historic Rights,’” 11 Syr. J. Int'l L. & Com.327 (1984)Google Scholar

Gonsiorowski, M., “Political Arbitration under the General Act of Pacific Settlement of Disputes,” 27 Am. J. Int'l L.469 (1933)Google Scholar

Gray, Christine, and Kingsbury, Benedict, “Developments in Dispute Settlement Inter-State Arbitration Since 1945,” 63 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.97 (1992)Google Scholar

Grolin, Jesper, “The Future of the Law of the Sea: Consequences of a Non-Treaty or Non-Universal Treaty Situation,” 13 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.1 (1983)Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo, The Freedom of the Seas or the Right which Belongs to the Dutch to Take Part in the East Indian Trade (Ralph Magoffin trans., James Brown Scott ed., Oxford Univ. Press 1916) (1633)

Grotius, Hugo, The Rights of War and Peace (A. C. Campbell trans., Introduction by David J. Hill, Universal Classic Library ed., 1901) (1646)

Grunawalt, Richard J., “United States Policy on International Straits,” 18 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.445 (1987)Google Scholar

Guillaume, Gilbert, “The Future of International Judicial Institutions,” 44 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.849 (1995)Google Scholar

Gutteridge, J. A. C., “The 1958 Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf,” 35 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.102 (1959)Google Scholar

Hafetz, Jonathan L., “Fostering Protection of the Marine Environment and Economic Development: Article 121(3) of the Third Law of the Sea Convention,” 15 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 584 (2000)

Haggard, Stephan, and Simmons, Beth A., “Theories of International Regimes,” 41 I nt'l Org.491 (1987)Google Scholar

Hardy, Michael, “The Law of the Sea and the Prospects for Deep Seabed Mining: The Position of the European Community,” 17 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.309 (1986)Google Scholar

Harlow, Bruce A., “UNCLOS III and Conflict Management in Straits,” 15 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.197 (1985)Google Scholar

Hayashi, Moritaka, “Japan and Deep Seabed Mining,” 17 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.351 (1986)Google Scholar

Hayashi, Moritaka, “The Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases: Prescription of Provisional Measures by the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” 13 Tul. Envtl L. J.361 (2000)Google Scholar

Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolff, “The Law of Armed Conflict at Sea,” in Handbook of Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts (Dieter Fleck ed., 1995), p. 403

Horowitz, Deborah, “The Catch of Poseidon's Trident: The Fate of High Seas Fisheries in the Southern Bluefin Tuna Case,” 25 Melb. Univ. L.R.810 (2001)Google Scholar

Howe, Nick, “ITLOS – A Practitioner's Perspective,” in Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Myron H. Nordquist and John Norton Moore eds., 2001), p. 159

Hudson, Manley O., “The First Conference for the Codification of International Law,” 24 Am. J. Int'l L.447 (1930)Google Scholar

Hudson, Manley O., International Tribunals: Past and Future (1944)

Hurst, Sir Cecil, “Whose is the Sea Bed?,” 4 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.34 (1923–24)Google Scholar

Hutchinson, D. N., “The seaward limit to continental shelf jurisdiction in customary international law,” 56 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.112 (1986)Google Scholar

International Maritime Organization, Guidance for Ships Transiting Archipelagic Waters, IMO SN/Circ.206, January 8, 1999

Irwin, P. C., “Settlement of Maritime Boundary Disputes: An Analysis of the Law of the Sea Negotiations,” 8 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.51 (1980)Google Scholar

Jacovides, Andreas J., “Peaceful Settlement of Disputes in Ocean Conflicts: Does UNCLOS III Point the Away?,” in Contemporary Issues in International Law, Essays in Honor of Louis B. Sohn (Thomas Buergenthal ed., 1984), p. 165

Jaenicke, Günther, “Dispute Settlement under the Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 43 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht813 (1983)Google Scholar

Jagota, S. P., Maritime Boundary (1985)

Janis, Mark, Sea Power and the Law of the Sea (1976)

Janis, Mark W., “Dispute Settlement in the Law of the Sea Convention: The Military Activities Exception,” 4 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.51 (1977)Google Scholar

Jenks, C. Wilfred, The Prospects of International Adjudication (1964)

Jennings, Robert Y., “The Principles Governing Marine Boundaries,” in Staat und Völkerrechtsordnung: Festschrift für Karl Doehring (Kay Hailbronner et al. eds., 1989), p. 397

Jessup, Philip, The Law of Territorial Waters and Maritime Jurisdiction (1927)

Jessup, Philip C., “The International Law Commission's 1954 Report on the Regime of the Territorial Sea,” 49 Am. J. Int'l L.221 (1955)Google Scholar

Jessup, Philip C., “Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea: A Study in International Law-Making,” 52 Am. J. Int'l L.730 (1958)Google Scholar

Jessup, Philip C., “The United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea,” 59 Colum. L. Rev.234 (1959)Google Scholar

Jessup, Philip C., “The Law of the Sea Around Us,” 55 Am. J. Int'l L.104 (1961)Google Scholar

Johnson, D. H. N., “The Preparation of the 1958 Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea,” 8 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.123 (1959)Google Scholar

Johnson, D. H. N., “International Arbitration Back in Favour?,” 34 Y.B. World Aff.305 (1980)Google Scholar

Johnston, Douglas M., “Fishery Diplomacy and Science and the Judicial Function,” 10 Y.B. Int'l Envtl L.33 (1999)Google Scholar

Jones, William B., “Risk Assessment: Corporate Ventures in Deep Seabed Mining Outside the Framework of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 16 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.241 (1986)Google Scholar

Joyner, Christopher C., “Compliance and Enforcement in New International Fisheries Law,” 12 Temp. Int'l & Comp. L.J.271 (1998)Google Scholar

Juda, Lawrence, “The Exclusive Economic Zone: Compatibility of National Claims and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 16 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.1 (1986)Google Scholar

Kass, S. L., “Obligatory Negotiations in International Organisations,” 3 Can. Y.B. Int'l L.36 (1965)Google Scholar

Kaye, Lawrence Wayne, “The Innocent Passage of Warships in Foreign Territorial Seas: A Threatened Freedom,” 15 San Diego L. Rev.573 (1978)Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (1984)

Keohane, Robert O., International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory (1989)

Kibola, Hamisi S., “A Note on Africa and the Exclusive Economic Zone,” 16 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.369 (1986)Google Scholar

Kimball, Lee, “Turning Points in the Future of Deep Seabed Mining,” 17 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.367 (1986)Google Scholar

Kimball, Lee, “The Law of the Sea Convention and Marine Environment Protection,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.745 (1995)Google Scholar

Kindt, John Warren, “Dispute Settlement in International Environmental Issues: The Model Provided by the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 22 Vand. J. Transnat'l L.1097 (1989)Google Scholar

Knight, H. G., Consequences of Non-Agreement at the Third UN Law of the Sea Conference (1976)

Koh, Kwang Lim, “The Continental Shelf and the International Law Commission,” 35 B.U.L. Rev.523 (1955)Google Scholar

Koh, Tommy T. B., “Negotiating a New World Order for the Sea,” 24 Va. J. Int'l L.761 (1984)Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D., “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables,” in International Regimes (Stephen D. Krasner ed., 1983), p. 1

Kronmiller, T., The Lawfulness of Deep Seabed Mining (1980)

Kwiatkowska, Barbara, The 200 Mile Exclusive Economic Zone in the New Law of the Sea (1989)

Kwiatkowska, Barbara, “The High Seas Fisheries Regime: at a Point of No Return?,” 8 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.327 (1993)Google Scholar

Kwiatkowska, Barbara, “Inauguration of the ITLOS Jurisprudence: The Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea M/V Saiga Case,” 30 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.43 (1999)Google Scholar

Kwiatkowska, Barbara, “The Southern Bluefin Tuna (New Zealand v Japan; Australia v Japan) Cases,” 15 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L. 1 (2000) [Kwiatkowska, “Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases”]

Kwiatkowska, Barbara, “Southern Bluefin Tuna (Australia and New Zealand v. Japan). Jurisdiction and Admissibility,” 95 Am. J. Int'l L.162 (2001) [Kwiatkowska, “Jurisdiction and Admissibility”]Google Scholar

Kwiatkowska, Barbara, “The Australia and New Zealand v. Japan Southern Bluefin Tuna (Jurisdiction and Admissibility) Award of the First Law of the Sea Convention Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal,” 16 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.239 (2001) [Kwiatkowska, “First Award”]Google Scholar

Kwiatkowska, Barbara, and Soons, Alfred H. A., “Entitlement to Maritime Areas of Rocks Which Cannot Sustain Human Habitation of Economic Life of Their Own,” 21 Neth. Y.B. Int'l L.139 (1990)Google Scholar

Laing, Edward Arthur, “ITLOS Procedures and Practices: Bonds,” in Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Myron H. Nordquist and John Norton Moore eds., 2001), p. 113

Larson, David L., “Security Issues and the Law of the Sea: A General Framework,” 15 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.99 (1985)Google Scholar

Larson, David L., “Deep Seabed Mining: A Definition of the Problem,” 17 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.271 (1986)Google Scholar

Larson, David L., “Innocent, Transit, and Archipelagic Sea Lanes Passage,” 18 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.411 (1987)Google Scholar

Larson, David L., “Naval Weaponry and the Law of the Sea,” 18 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.125 (1987)Google Scholar

Laslo, Ervin et al., The Objectives of the New International Economic Order (1979)

Lauterpacht, Eli, “The First Decision of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: The M/V Saiga,” in Liber Amicorum Professor Ignaz Seidl-Hohenveldern (Gerhard Hafner et al. eds., 1998), p. 395

Lauterpacht, Hersch, “Sovereignty Over Submarine Areas,” 27 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.376 (1950)Google Scholar

Leich, Marian Nash, “U.S. Practice, Indonesia: Archipelagic Waters,” 83 Am. J. Int'l L.558 (1989)Google Scholar

Lillich, Richard B., and Brower, Charles N., eds., International Arbitration in the 21st Century: Towards “Judicialization” and Uniformity?: the Twelfth Sokol Colloquium (1994)

Lowe, A. V., “The Commander's Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations and the Contemporary Law of the Sea,” in 64 International Law Studies: The Law of Naval Operations (Horace B. Robertson ed., 1991), p. 111

Lowe, Vaughan, “The Impact of the Law of the Sea on Naval Warfare,” 14 Syracuse J. Int'l L. & Comm.657 (1988)Google Scholar

Lowe, Vaughan, “The M/V Saiga: The First Case in the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” 48 Int'l & Comp. L. Q.187 (1999)Google Scholar

Malia, Gerald A., “The New ‘International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea’: Prospects for Dispute Resolution at the ‘Sea Court,’” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.791 (1995)Google Scholar

Malone, James L., “The United States and the Law of the Sea,” 24 Va. J. Int'l L. 785, 785–86 (1984)Google Scholar

Mangone, Gerard J., “Straits Used for International Navigation,” 18 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.391 (1987)Google Scholar

Manley, Robert H., “The Geneva Conferences on the Law of the Sea as a Step in the International Law-Making Process,” 25 Alb. L. Rev.17 (1961)Google Scholar

Manner, Eero J., “Settlement of Sea-Boundary Delimitation Disputes According to the Provisions of the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention,” in Essays in International Law in Honour of Judge Manfred Lachs (Jerzy Makarczyk ed., 1984), p. 625

de Marfy, Annick, “The Pardo Declaration and the Six Years of the Sea-Bed Committee,” in 1 A Handbook on the New Law of the Sea (René-Jean Dupuy and Daniel Vignes eds., 1991), p. 144

Martin, Will, “Fisheries Conservation and Management of Straddling Stocks and Highly Migratory Stocks under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.765 (1995)Google Scholar

Max Planck Institute, Judicial Settlement of International Disputes (1974)

McConnell, Moira L., and Gold, Edgar, “The Modern Law of the Sea: Framework for the Protection and Preservation of the Marine Environment?,” 23 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L.83 (1991)Google Scholar

McDorman, Ted L., “The Dispute Settlement Regime of the Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks Convention,” Canadian Y.B. Int'l L.57 (1997)Google Scholar

McDougal, Myres S., and Burke, William T., “Crisis in the Law of the Sea: Community Perspectives Versus National Egoism,” 67 Yale L. J.539 (1958)Google Scholar

McDougal, Myres S., and Burke, William T., The Public Order of the Oceans: A Contemporary International Law of the Sea (1962)

McDougal, Myres S., and Schlei, Norbert A., “The Hydrogen Bomb Tests in Perspective: Lawful Measures for Security,” 64 Yale L. J.648 (1955)Google Scholar

McNees, Richard B., “Freedom of Transit Through International Straits,” 6 J. Mar. L. & Com.175 (1974–75)Google Scholar

McNeill, John H., “The Strategic Significance of the Law of the Sea Convention,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.703 (1995)Google Scholar

Meltzer, Evelyne, “Global Overview of Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks: The Nonsustainable Nature of High Seas Fisheries,” 25 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.255 (1994)Google Scholar

Merrills, J. G., International Dispute Settlement (3rd ed., 1998)

Miles, Edward, “The Structure and Effects of the Decision Process in the Seabed Committee and the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea,” 31 Int'l Org.159 (1977)Google Scholar

Miles, Edward L., and Burke, William T., “Pressures on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 1982 Arising from New Fisheries Conflicts,” 20 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.343 (1989)Google Scholar

Mirvahabi, Farin, “Fishery Disputes Settlement and the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea,” 57 Revue de Droit Int'l de Sciences Diplomatiques et Politiques45 (1979)Google Scholar

Molitor, Michael R., “The U.S. Deep Seabed Mining Regulations: The Legal Basis for an Alternative Regime,” 19 San Diego L. Rev.599 (1982)Google Scholar

Molitor, Steven J., “The Provisional Understanding Regarding Deep Seabed Matters: An Ill-Conceived Regime for U.S. Deep Seabed Mining,” 20 Cornell Int'l L. J.223 (1987)Google Scholar

Moore, John Norton, “The Regime of Straits and the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea,” 74 Am. J. Int'l L.77 (1980)Google Scholar

Moore, John Norton, “The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Rule of Law,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.645 (1995)Google Scholar

Morgan, Donald L., “A Practitioner's Critique of the Order Granting Provisional Measures in the Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases,” in Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Myron H. Nordquist and John Norton Moore eds., 2001), p. 173

Morgan, Donald L., “Emerging Fora for International Litigation (Part 1): Implications of the Proliferation of International Legal Fora: The Example of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases,” 43 Harv. Int'l L.J.541 (2002)Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans, Politics Among Nations (5th ed., 1973)

Morris, Hugh G., “The Continental Shelf – An International Dilemma,” 1 Osgoode Hall L. J.37 (1958)Google Scholar

Morris, Michael A., “The New International Economic Order and the New Law of the Sea,” in The New International Economic Order – Confrontation or Cooperation between North and South? (Karl P. Sauvant and Hajo Hasenpflug eds., 1977), p. 175–89

Morrison, Fred L., “The Future of International Adjudication,” 75 Minn. L. Rev.827 (1991)Google Scholar

Moss, Ronald Scott, “Insuring Unilaterally Licensed Deep Seabed Mining Operations Against Adverse Rulings by the International Court of Justice: An Assessment of the Risks,” 14 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.161 (1984)Google Scholar

Munkman, A. L. W., “Adjudication and Adjustment – International Judicial Decision and the Settlement of Territorial and Boundary Disputes,” 46 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.1 (1972–73)Google Scholar

Murphy, C. F., “The World Court and the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes,” 7 Ga. J. Int. & Comp. L.551 (1977)Google Scholar

Nandan, Satya N., “Legislative and Executive Powers of the International Seabed Authority for the Implementation of the Law of the Sea Convention,” in Order for the Oceans at the Turn of the Century (Davor Vidas and Willy Østreng eds., 1999), p. 73

Ndiaye, Tafsir Malick, “Provisional Measures Before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” in Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Myron H. Nordquist and John Norton Moore eds., 2001), p. 95

Nelson, L. D. M., “The Roles of Equity in the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries,” 84 Am. J. Int'l L.837 (1990)Google Scholar

Nordquist, Myron H. et al. eds., United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary (1989)

Northedge, F. S., and Donelan, M. D., International Disputes: The Political Aspects (1971)

Noyes, John E., “Compulsory Third-Party Adjudication and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 4 Conn. J. Int'l L.675 (1989)Google Scholar

Noyes, John E., “The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” 32 Cornell Int'l L.J.109 (1999)Google Scholar

O'Connell, D. P., “The Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea: Possible Implications for Australia,” 32 Australian L. J.134 (1958)Google Scholar

O'Connell, D. P., The Influence of Law on Sea Power (1975)

O'Connell, D. P., The International Law of the Sea (I. A. Shearer ed., 1984)

Oda, Shigeru, “The Territorial Sea and Natural Resources,” 4 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.415 (1955)Google Scholar

Oda, Shigeru, “A Reconsideration of the Continental Shelf Doctrine,” 32 Tul. L. Rev.21 (1957)Google Scholar

Oda, Shigeru, “Fisheries under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 77 Am. J. Int'l L.739 (1983)Google Scholar

Oda, Shigeru, “Some Reflections on the Dispute Settlement Clauses in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” in Essays in International Law in Honour of Judge Manfred Lachs (Jerzy Makarczyk ed., 1984), p. 645

Oda, Shigeru, “Dispute Settlement Prospects in the Law of the Sea,” 44 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.863 (1995)Google Scholar

Oellers-Frahm, Karin, “Interim Measures of Protection,” in 1 Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Rudolph Bernhardt ed., 1986), p. 70

Örebech, Peter, Sigurjonsson, Ketill, and McDorman, Ted L., “The 1995 United Nations Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks Agreement: Management, Enforcement and Dispute Settlement,” 13 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.119 (1998)Google Scholar

Orrego Vicuña, Francisco ed., The Exclusive Economic Zone: A Latin American Perspective (1984)

Orrego Vicuña, Francisco “The Contribution of the Exclusive Economic Zone to the Law of Maritime Delimitation,” 31 German Y.B. Int'l L.120 (1988)Google Scholar

Orrego Vicuña, Francisco ed., The Exclusive Economic Zone: Regime and Legal Nature under International Law (1989)

Oude Elferink, Alex G., “The Impact of the Law of the Sea Convention on the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries,” in Order for the Oceans at the Turn of the Century (Davor Vidas and Willy Østreng eds., 1999), p. 457

Oxman, Bernard H., “The Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea: The 1976 New York Session,” 71 Am. J. Int'l L.247 (1977)Google Scholar

Oxman, Bernard H., “The Third United Nation's Conference on the Law of the Sea: The 1977 New York Session,” 72 Am. J. Int'l L.57 (1978)Google Scholar

Oxman, Bernard H., “The Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea: The Seventh Session (1978),” 73 Am. J. Int'l L.1 (1979)Google Scholar

Oxman, Bernard H., “The Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea: The Eighth Session (1979),” 74 Am. J. Int'l L.1 (1980)Google Scholar

Oxman, Bernard H., “The Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea: The Ninth Session (1980),” 75 Am. J. Int'l L.211 (1981)Google Scholar

Oxman, Bernard H., “The Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea: The Tenth Session,” 76 Am. J. Int'l L.1 (1982)Google Scholar

Oxman, Bernard H., “The Regime of Warships Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 24 Va. J. Int'l L.809 (1984)Google Scholar

Oxman, Bernard H., “The High Seas and the International Seabed Area,” 10 Mich. J. Int'l L.526 (1989) [Oxman, “International Seabed Area”]Google Scholar

Oxman, Bernard H., “Commentary,” in Implementation of the Law of the Sea Convention Through International Institutions (Alfred H. A. Soons ed., 1990), p. 648 [Oxman, “Commentary”]

Oxman, Bernard H., “International Law and Naval and Air Operations,” in 64 International Law Studies: The Law of Naval Operations (Horace B. Robertson ed., 1991), p. 19

Oxman, Bernard H., “The 1994 Agreement and the Convention,” 88 Am. J. Int'l L.687 (1994) [Oxman, “1994 Agreement and the Convention”]Google Scholar

Oxman, Bernard H., “International Maritime Boundaries: Political, Strategic, and Historical Considerations,” 26 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev.243 (1994–95)Google Scholar

Oxman, Bernard H., “Observations on Vessel Release under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 11 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.201 (1996)Google Scholar

Oxman, Bernard H., “The 1994 Agreement relating to the Implementation of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea,” in Order for the Oceans at the Turn of the Century (Davor Vidas and Willy Østreng eds., 1999), p. 15 [Oxman, “1994 Agreement relating to Implementation”]

Oxman, Bernard H., “Complementary Agreements & Compulsory Jurisdiction,” 95 Am. J. Int'l L.277 (2001)Google Scholar

Oxman, Bernard H., and Bantz, Vincent P., “The ‘Camouco’ (Panama v. France) (Judgment),” 94 Am. J. Int'l L.713 (2000)Google Scholar

Pardo, Arvid, and Borgese, Elizabeth Mann, The New International Economic Order and the Law of the Sea (1976)

Pauwelyn, Joost, “The Concept of a ‘Continuing Violation’ of an International Obligation: Selected Problems,” 66 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.415, 435 (1995)Google Scholar

Pharand, Donat, Canada's Arctic Waters in International Law (1988)

Phillips, J. C., “The Exclusive Economic Zone as a Concept in International Law,” 26 Int'l & Comp. L. Q.585 (1977)Google Scholar

Picard, M. Johanne, “International Law of Fisheries and Small Developing States: A Call for the Recognition of Regional Hegemony,” 31 Texas Int'l L.J.317 (1996)Google Scholar

Pierce, George A., “Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in the Draft Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 10 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol. 331 (1981)Google Scholar

Pirtle, Charles E., “Transit Rights and U.S. Security Interests in International Straits: The ‘Straits Debate’ Revisited,” 5 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.477 (1978)Google Scholar

Politakis, George P., Modern Aspects of the Laws of Naval Warfare and Maritime Neutrality (1998)

Pontecorvo, Guilio, “Musing About Seabed Mining, or Why What We Don't Know Can't Hurt Us,” 21 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.117 (1990)Google Scholar

Poulantzas, Nicholas M., The Right of Hot Pursuit in International Law (1969)

Powers, Robert D. Jr., and Hardy, Leonard R., “How Wide the Territorial Sea?,” 53 Int'l L. Studies, Appendix N, p. 305 (1959–60)Google Scholar

Prescott, Michael K., “How War Affects Treaties between Belligerents: A Case Study of the Gulf War,” 7 Emory Int'l L. Rev.192 (1993)Google Scholar

Ralston, Jackson H., The Law and Procedure of International Tribunals (1926)

Rao, P. Sreenivasa, “Legal Regulation of Maritime Military Uses,” 13 Indian J. Int'l L.425 (1973)Google Scholar

Rauch, Elmar, “Military Uses of the Oceans” [1984] 28 German Y.B. Int'l L.229 (1985)Google Scholar

Reeves, Jesse S., “The Codification of the Law of Territorial Waters,” 24 Am. J. Int'l L.486 (1930)Google Scholar

Reisman, W. Michael, “The Regime of Straits and National Security: An Appraisal of International Lawmaking,” 74 Am. J. Int'l L.48 (1980)Google Scholar

Reisman, W. Michael, “Eritrea-Yemen Arbitration (Award, Phase II: Maritime Delimitation),” 94 Am. J. Int'l L.721 (2000) [Reisman, Eritrea-Yemen]Google Scholar

Reisman, W. Michael, and Westerman, Gayl S., Straight Baselines in Maritime Boundary Delimitation (1992)

Reubens, Edwin P., “An Overview of the NIEO,” in The Challenge of the New International Economic Order (Edwin P. Reubens ed., 1981), p. 1

Reuland, Robert C., “The Customary Right of Hot Pursuit onto the High Seas: Annotations to Article 111 of the Law of the Sea Convention,” 33 Va. J. Int'l L.557 (1993)Google Scholar

Rhee, Sang-Myon, “Sea Boundary Delimitation Between States before World War II,” 76 Am. J. Int'l L.555, 556 (1982)Google Scholar

Richardson, Elliot L., “Power, Mobility and the Law of the Sea,” 58 Foreign Aff.902 (1979–80)Google Scholar

Richardson, Elliot L., “Law of the Sea: Navigation and Other Traditional National Security Considerations,” 19 San Diego L. Rev.553 (1982)Google Scholar

Richardson, Elliot L., “Dispute Settlement under the Convention on the Law of the Sea: A Flexible and Comprehensive Extension of the Rule of the Law to Ocean Space,” in Contemporary Issues in International Law, Essays in Honor of Louis B. Sohn (Thomas Buergenthal ed., 1984), p. 149

Richardson, Elliot L., “The Case for the Convention,” in The 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea (Albert W. Koers and Bernard H. Oxman eds., 1984), p. 4

Riphagen, W., “Dispute Settlement in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” in The New Law of the Sea (C. L. Rozakis and C. A. Stephanou eds., 1983), p. 281

Roach, J. Ashley, “Dispute Settlement in Specific Situations,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.775 (1995)Google Scholar

Robertson, Horace B., “Navigation in the Exclusive Economic Zone,” 24 Va. J. Int'l L.865 (1984)Google Scholar

Romano, Cesare, “The Southern Bluefin Tuna Dispute: Hints of a World to Come … Like It or Not,” 32 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.313 (2001)Google Scholar

Ronzitti, N., ed., The Law of Naval Warfare: A Collection of Agreements and Documents with Commentaries (1988)

Rosen, Mark E., “Military Mobility and the 1982 UN Law of the Sea Convention,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl L. Rev.717 (1995)Google Scholar

Rosenne, Shabtai, ed., League of Nations, Conference for the Codification of International Law [1930] (1975)

Rosenne, Shabtai, “Settlement of Fisheries Disputes in the Exclusive Economic Zone,” 73 Am. J. Int'l L.89 (1979)Google Scholar

Rosenne, Shabtai, “Establishing the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” 89 Am. J. Int'l L.806 (1995)Google Scholar

Rosenne, Shabtai, “International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: 1998 Survey,” 14 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.453 (1999)Google Scholar

Rosenne, Shabtai, “Historic Waters in the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea,” in Reflections on Principles and Practice of International Law: Essays in Honour of Leo J. Bouchez (Terry D. Gill and Wybo P. Heere eds., 2000), p. 191

Rosenne, Shabtai, “The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Survey for 1999,” 15 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.443 (2000)Google Scholar

Rosenne, Shabtai, “The Case-Law of ITLOS (1997–2001): An Overview,” in Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Myron H. Nordquist and John Norton Moore, eds., 2001), p. 127

Sands, Phillipe, “ITLOS: An International Lawyer's Perspective,” in Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Myron H. Nordquist and John Norton Moore, eds., 2001), p. 141

Schachte, William L. Jr., “National Security: Customary International Law and the Convention on the law of the Sea,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl L. Rev.709 (1995)Google Scholar

Schwebel, Stephen M., “The Southern Bluefin Tuna Case,” in Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda (N. Ando et al. eds., 2002), p. 743

Scott, James Brown, Judicial Settlement of International Disputes (1927)

Seeberg-Elverfeldt, Niels-J, The Settlement of Disputes in Deep Seabed Mining: Access, Jurisdiction and Procedure Before the Seabed Disputes Chamber of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (1998)

Selden, John, Of the Dominion, Or, Ownership of the Sea (Marchamont Nedham trans., 1972) (1635)

Sharma, Surya P., “Framework of Likely Disputes under the Law of the Sea Convention – Some Thoughts,” 45 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht465 (1985)Google Scholar

Shavloske, Patrick, “The Canadian-Spanish Fishing Dispute: A Template for Assessing the Inadequacies of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and a Clarion Call for Ratification of the New Fish Stock Treaty,” 7 Ind. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev.223 (1996)Google Scholar

Shyam, Majula R., “The U. N. Convention on the Law of the Sea and Military Interests in the Indian Ocean,” 15 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.147 (1985)Google Scholar

Shyam, Majula R., “Deep Seabed Mining: An Indian Perspective,” 17 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.325 (1986)Google Scholar

Simpson, J. L. and Fox, Hazel, International Arbitration: Law and Practice (1959)

Singh, Gurdip, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Dispute Settlement Mechanisms (1985)

Sohn, Louis B., “Exclusion of Political Disputes from Judicial Settlement,” 38 Am. J. Int'l L.694 (1944)Google Scholar

Sohn, Louis B., “The Role of International Institutions as Conflict Adjusting Agencies,” 28 U. Chi. L. Rev.205 (1960–61)Google Scholar

Sohn, Louis B., “The Role of International Arbitration Today,” 108 Hague Recueil des Cours1 (1963)Google Scholar

Sohn, Louis B., “The Role of Arbitration in Recent International Multilateral Treaties,” 23 Va. J. Int'l L.171 (1982–83)Google Scholar

Sohn, Louis B., “The Future of Dispute Settlement,” in The Structure and Process of International Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy, Doctrine, and Theory (Ronald St. J. MacDonald and Douglas M. Johnston eds., 1983), p. 1121

Sohn, Louis B., “Peacetime Use of Force on the High Seas,” in 64 International Law Studies: The Law of Naval Operations (Horace B. Robertson ed., 1991), p. 38

Sohn, Louis B., “International Law Implications of the 1994 Agreement,” 88 Am. J. Int'l L.698 (1994)Google Scholar

Sohn, Louis B., “Settlement of Law of the Sea Disputes,” 10 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.205 (1995)Google Scholar

Soons, Alfred H. A., Marine Scientific Research and the Law of the Sea (1982)

Soons, Alfred H. A., Implementation of the Law of the Sea Convention Through International Institutions (1990)

Soons, Alfred H. A., International Arbitration: Past and Prospects (1990)

Sorensen, Max, “Law of the Sea,” 520 Int'l Conciliation195 (1958)Google Scholar

Spinnato, John M., “Historic and Vital Bays: An Analysis of Libya's Claim to the Gulf of Sidra,” 13 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.65 (1983)Google Scholar

Stephens, Dale G., “The Impact of the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention on the Conduct of Peacetime Naval/Military Operations,” 29 Calif. W. Int'l L. J.283 (1999)Google Scholar

Stevenson, John R., and Oxman, Bernard H., “The Preparations for the Law of the Sea Conference,” 68 Am. J. Int'l L.1 (1974)Google Scholar

Stevenson, John R., and Oxman, Bernard H., “The Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea: The 1974 Caracas Session,” 69 Am. J. Int'l L.1 (1975)Google Scholar

Stevenson, John R., and Oxman, Bernard H., “The Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea: The 1975 Geneva Session,” 69 Am. J. Int'l L.763 (1975)Google Scholar

Stevenson, John R., and Oxman, Bernard H., “The Future of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 88 Am. J Int'l L.488 (1994)Google Scholar

Stuart, James Lyall, “Law of the Sea: Unilateral Licensing of Seabed Mining – Deep Sea Mining (Temporary Provisions) Act 1981, ch. 53,” 23 Harv. J. Int'l L.155 (1982)Google Scholar

Surace-Smith, Kathryn, “United States Activity Outside of the Law of the Sea Convention: Deep Seabed Mining and Transit Passage,” 84 Columbia L. Rev.1032 (1984)Google Scholar

Swan, Charles, and Ueberhorst, James, “The Conference on the Law of the Sea: A Report,” 56 Mich. L. Rev.1132 (1958)Google Scholar

Taniguchi, Chad, “Jurisdiction, Enforcement and Dispute Settlement in the Law of the Sea Convention,” in Consensus and Confrontation: the United States and the Law of the Sea Convention (Jon M. Van Dyke ed., 1985), p. 462

Treves, Tullio, “The Settlement of Disputes According to the Straddling Stocks Agreement of 1995,” in International Law and Sustainable Development: Past Achievements and Future Challenges (Alan Boyle and David Freestone eds., 1999), p. 253

Treves, Tullio, “Preliminary Proceedings in the Settlement of Disputes under the United Nations Law of the Sea Convention: Some Observations,” in Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda (N. Ando et al. eds., 2002), p. 749

Truver, Scott C., “The Law of the Sea and the Military Use of the Oceans in 2010,” 45 La. L. Rev.1221 (1985)Google Scholar

UN Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea, Handbook on the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries, UN Sales No. E.01.V.2 (2000)

US Department of State, Pub. No. 112, Limits in the Seas: United States Responses to Excessive Maritime Claims (1992)

Van Dyke, Jon M., Consensus and Confrontation: the United States and the Law of the Sea Convention (1985)

Dyke, Jon M., and Brooks, Robert A., “Uninhabited Islands: Their Impact on the Ownership of the Oceans’ Resources,” 12 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.265 (1983)Google Scholar

Dyke, Jon, and Yuen, Christopher, “‘Common Heritage’ v. ‘Freedom of the High Seas’: Which Governs the Seabed?,” 19 San Diego L. Rev.493 (1982)Google Scholar

Vorah, L. C., Askin, Kelly Dawn, and Mundis, Daryl A., “Contemporary Law Regulating Armed Conflict at Sea,” in Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda (N. Ando et al. eds., 2002), p. 1523

Waldock, C. M. H. ed., International Disputes: The Legal Aspects (1972)

Wang, James C. F., Handbook on Ocean Politics and Law (1992)

Weil, Prosper, The Law of Maritime Delimitation – Reflections (1989)

Whiteman, Marjorie M., “Conference on the Law of the Sea: Convention on the Continental Shelf,” 52 Am. J. Int'l L.629, 637 (1958)Google Scholar

Wilson, Robert R., “Reservation Clauses in Agreements of Obligatory Arbitration,” 23 Am. J. Int'l L.68 (1929)Google Scholar

Wisnomoerti, Noegroho, “Indonesia and the Law of the Sea,” in The Law of the Sea: Problems from the East Asian Perspective (Choon-ho Park and Jae Kyu Park eds., 1987), p. 392

Wolfrum, Rüdiger, “Restricting the Use of the Sea to Peaceful Purposes: Demilitarization in Being?,” 24 German Y.B. Int'l L.200 (1981)Google Scholar

Yankov, Alexander, “Current Fisheries Disputes and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” in Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Myron H. Nordquist and John Norton Moore eds., 2001), p. 223

Yankov, Alexander, “Irregularities in Fishing Activities and the Role of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” in Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda (N. Ando et al. eds., 2002), p. 773

Young, Oran R., “International Regimes: Toward a New Theory of Institutions,” 39 World Pol.104 (1986)Google Scholar

Young, Richard, “The Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf: A First Impression,” 52 Am. J. Int'l L.733 (1958)Google Scholar

Zedalis, Rex J., “Military Uses of the Ocean Space and the Developing International Law of the Sea: An Analysis in the Context of Peacetime ASW,” 16 San Diego L. Rev.575 (1979)Google Scholar

Zedalis, Rex J., “‘Peaceful Purposes’ and Other Relevant Provisions of the Revised Composite Negotiating Text: A Comparative Analysis of the Existing and Proposed Military Regime for the High Seas,” 7 Syracuse J. Int'l L and Com.1 (1979)Google Scholar

“Harvard Research in International Law, Law of Treaties,” 29 Am. J. Int'l L. Supp.653 (1935)

“Statement by Expert Panel: U.S. Policy on the Settlement of Disputes in the Law of the Sea,” 81 Am. J. Int'l L.438 (1987)

“Territorial Seas and Fisheries Disputes,” Solicitors J.849 (1959)

“The Effects of Armed Conflicts on Treaties,” 61-II Y.B. Inst. Int'l L.199 (1986)

GA Res. 900, UN GAOR, 9th Sess., Supp. No. 21, at 51, UN Doc. A/2890 (1954)

Report of the International Technical Conference on the Conservation of the Living Resources of the Sea to the International Law Commission, UN Doc. A/CONF.10/5/Rev.2 (1955)

Documents of the Second Session including the Report of the Commission to the General Assembly, [1950] 2 Y.B. Int'l L. Comm'n, UN Doc. A/CN.4/Ser.A/1950 /Add.1, UN Sales No. 1957.V.3, vol. II (1957)

Summary Records of the Second Session, [1950] 1 Y.B. Int'l L. Comm'n, UN Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/1950, UN Sales No. 1957.V.3, vol. I (1958)

Summary Records of the Third Session, [1951] 1 Y.B. Int'l L. Comm'n, UN Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/1951, UN Sales No. 1957.V.6, vol. I (1957)

Documents of the Third Session including the Report of the Commission to the General Assembly, [1951] 2 Y.B. Int'l L. Comm'n, UN Doc. A/CN.4/Ser.A/1951 /Add.1, UN Sales No. 1957.V.6, vol. II (1957)

Summary Records of the Fourth Session, [1952] 1 Y.B. Int'l L. Comm'n, UN Doc. A/CN.4/Ser.A/1952, UN Sales No. 58.V.5, vol. I (1958)

Documents of the Fourth Session including the Report of the Commission to the General Assembly, [1952] 2 Y.B. Int'l L. Comm'n, UN Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/1952/Add. 1, UN Sales No. 58.V.5, vol. II (1958)

Summary Records of the Fifth Session, [1953] 1 Y.B. Int'l L. Comm'n, UN Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/1953, UN Sales No. 59.V.4, vol. I (1959)

Documents of the Fifth Session including the Report of the Commission to the General Assembly, [1953] 2 Y.B. Int'l L. Comm'n, UN Doc. A/CN.4/Ser.A/1953 /Add.1, UN Sales No. 59.V.4, vol. II (1959)

Summary Records of the Sixth Session, [1954] 1 Y.B. Int'l L. Comm'n, UN Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/1954, UN Sales No. 59.V.7, vol. I (1959)

Documents of the Sixth Session including the Report of the Commission to the General Assembly, [1954] 2 Y.B. Int'l L. Comm'n, UN Doc. A/CN.4/Ser.A/1954 /Add.1, UN Sales No. 59.V.7, vol. II (1960)

Summary Records of the Seventh Session, [1955] 1 Y.B. Int'l L. Comm'n, UN Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/1955, UN Sales No. 60.V.3, vol. I (1960)

Documents of the Seventh Session including the Report of the Commission to the General Assembly, [1955] 2 Y.B. Int'l L. Comm'n, UN Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/1955/Add. 1, UN Sales No. 60.V.3, vol. II (1960)

Summary Records of the Eighth Session, [1956] 1 Y.B. Int'l L. Comm'n, UN Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/1956, UN Sales No. 1956.V.3, vol. I (1956)

Documents of the Eighth Session including the Report of the Commission to the General Assembly, [1956] 2 Y.B. Int'l L. Comm'n, UN Doc. A/CN.4/Ser.A/1956 /Add.1, UN Sales No. 1956.V.3, vol. II (1957)

GA Res. 1105, UN GAOR, 11th Sess., Supp. No. 17, at 54, UN Doc. A/3572 (1957)

GA Res. 1307, UN GAOR, 13th Sess., Supp. No. 18, at 54, UN Doc. A/4090 (1958)

United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, Preparatory Documents, UN Doc. A/CONF.13/37, UN Sales No. 58.V.4, vol. I (1958)

United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, Plenary Meetings, UN Doc. A/CONF.13/38, UN Sales No. 58.V.4, vol. II (1958)

United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, 1st Comm., UN Doc. A/CONF.13/39, UN Sales No. 58.V.4, vol. III (1958)

United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, 2nd Comm., UN Doc. A/CONF.13/40, UN Sales No. 58.V.4, vol. IV (1958)

United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, 3rd Comm., UN Doc. A/CONF.13/41, UN Sales No. 58.V.4, vol. V (1958)

United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, 4th Comm., UN Doc. A/CONF.13/42, UN Sales No. 58.V.4, vol. VI (1958)

United Nations Second Conference on the Law of the Sea – Official Records, Summary Records of Plenary Meetings and of Meetings of the Committee of the Whole, Annexes and Final Act, UN Doc. A/CONF.19/8, UN Sales No. 60.V.6 (1960)

Juridical Regime of Historic Waters, including Historic Bays, UN Doc. A/CN.4/143, reprinted in Documents of the Thirteenth Session including the Report of the Commission to the General Assembly, [1962] 2 Y.B. Int'l L. Comm'n 1, UN Doc. A/CN.4/Ser.A/1962 /Add.1, UN Sales No. 62.V.5 (1962)

UN GAOR 1st Comm., 22d Sess., 1515th mtg, at 1–68, UN Doc. A/C.1/PV.1515 (1967)

UN GAOR 1st Comm., 22d Sess., 1515th mtg., at 1–6, UN Doc. A/C.1/PV.1516 (1967)

UN GAOR 1st Comm., 22d Sess., UN Doc. A/6695 (1967)

GA Res. 2340, UN GAOR, 22d Sess., Supp. No. 16, at 14, UN Doc. A/6716 (1967)

GA Res. 2574D, UN GAOR, 24th Sess., Supp. No. 30, at 11, UN Doc. A/7630 (1969)

GA Res. 2749, UN GAOR, 25th Sess., Supp. No. 28, at 24, UN Doc. A/8028 (1970)

Declaration of Principles on International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, GA Res. 2625, UN GAOR, 25th Sess., Supp. No. 28, at 121, UN Doc. A/2890 (1970)

Definition of Aggression, GA Res. 3314, UN GAOR, 29th Sess., Supp. No. 31, at 142, UN Doc. A/9631 (1975)

3 Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea: Official Records, UN Sales No. E.75.V.5 (1974)

5 Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea: Official Records, UN Sales No. E.76.V.8 (1984)

16 Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea: Official Records, UN Sales No. E.84.V.2 (1984)

17 Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea: Official Records, UN Sales No. E.84.V.3 (1984)

United Nations, Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for the Law of the Sea, Law of the Sea Bulletin, No. 5 (1985)

United Nations Conference on Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks was established by General Assembly Resolution 47/192 on 22 December 1992. See GA Res. 192, UN GAOR, 47th Sess., available at http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/47/a47r192.htm

Consultation of the Secretary-General on Outstanding Issues Relating to the Deep Seabed Regime Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: Report of the Secretary-General, UN GAOR, 48th Sess., Agenda Item 36, at 2, UN Doc. A/48/950 (1994)

GA Res. 28, UN GAOR, 49th Sess., (1994), available at http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/49/a49r028.htm, para. 15(f)

Oceans and the law of the sea: law of the sea; results of the review by the Commission on Sustainable Development of the sectoral theme of “oceans and seas,” UN Doc. A/54/429, (September 30, 1999)

Decision of the Assembly relating to the regulations on prospecting and exploration for polymetallic nodules in the Area, UN Doc. ISBA/6/A/18 (October 4, 2000)

Decision of the Council relating to the regulations and prospecting and exploration for polymetallic nodules in the Area, UN Doc. ISBA/6/C/12 (July 13, 2000)

Report of the Secretary-General of the International Seabed Authority under Article 166, paragraph 4 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, UN Doc. ISBA/8/A/5 (June 7, 2002)

Lists of Experts for the purposes of article 2 of Annex VIII (Special Arbitration) to the Convention, available at http://www.un.org/Depts/los/settlement_of_disputes/experts_special_arb.htm (as at June 24, 2003)

Multilateral Treaties Deposited with the Secretary-General, UN Doc. ST/LEG/SER.E/15, available at http://www.un.org/Depts/los/los_decl.htm (updated November 13, 2003)

Decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Matter of the Maritime Boundary Dispute between Norway and Sweden, 4 Am. J. Int'l L.226 (1910) [Grisbadarna]

Status of Eastern Carelia, Advisory Opinion No. 5, 1923 P.C.I.J. (ser. B) No. 5 (July 23)

Railway Traffic between Lithuania and Poland (Lith. v. Pol.) 1931 P.C.I.J. (Ser.A/B) No. 42

Treatment of Polish Nationals and Other Persons of Polish Origin or Speech in the Danzig Territory, Advisory Opinion, 1932, P.C.I.J., Series A/B, No. 44, p. 4

Free Zones of Upper Savoy and the District of Gex, Judgment, 1932, P.C.I.J., Series A/B, No. 46, p. 167

Corfu Channel (U.K. v. Alb.) 1949 ICJ 28 (Apr. 9)

Fisheries Case (U.K. v. Nor.) 1951 ICJ 116 (Dec. 18)

Ambatielos (Greece v. U.K.) 1953 ICJ 10 (May 19)

Interhandl Case (Switz. v. U.S.A) 1957 ICJ 105 (Oct. 24)

South West Africa (Second Phase) (Eth. v. S. Afr.; Liber. v. S. Afr.) 1966 ICJ 6 (July 18)

North Sea Continental Shelf (FRG/Den.; FRG/Neth.), 1969 ICJ 3 (Feb. 20)

Fisheries Jurisdiction (U.K. v. Ice.; FRG v. Ice.), Request for the Indication of Interim Measures of Protection, Order, 1972 ICJ 12, 30 (Aug. 17)

Fisheries Jurisdiction (U.K. v. Ice.; FRG v. Ice.) 1974 ICJ 3, 175 (July 25)

Nuclear Tests (Austl. v. Fr.; N.Z. v. Fr.) 1974 ICJ 253, 457 (Dec. 20)

Aegean Sea Continental Shelf Case, Request for Indication of Interim Measures of Protection, (Gr. v. Turk.) 1976 ICJ 3 (Sept. 11)

Delimitation of the Continental Shelf (U.K. /Fr.), 18 ILM 397 (1979)

Beagle Channel Arbitral Award (Arg./Chile), 17 ILM 632 (1978), 52 ILR 93 (1979)

United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Teheran (U.S. v. Iran), 1980 ICJ 3 (May 24)

Arbitral Award of 19 October 1981 (Emirates of Dubai/Sharjah), 91 ILR 543 (1981)

Report and Recommendations of the Conciliation Commission on the Continental Shelf Area between Iceland and Jan Mayen, 20 ILM 797 (1981)

Continental Shelf (Tunis./Libya), 1982 ICJ 18 (Feb. 24)

Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area (Can. v. U.S.) 1984 ICJ 246 (Oct. 12)

Military and Paramilitary Activities (Nicar. v. U.S.), 1984 ICJ 392 (Nov. 26)

Continental Shelf (Libya/Malta), 1985 ICJ 13 (June 3)

SPP(ME) Ltd. v. Egypt (First Decision on Jurisdiction), Nov. 27, 1985, 106 ILR 502

Filleting within the Gulf of St Lawrence between Canada and France (1986), 19 UN Rep. Int'l Arbitral Awards 225 (July 17)

Maritime Boundary (Guinea/Guinea-Bissau), 25 ILM 252 (1986), 83 ILR 1 (1989)

Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Sal./Hond.; Nicar. Intervening), 1992 ICJ 351 (Sept. 11)

Delimitation of the Maritime Areas between Canada and France (St Pierre and Miquelon), 31 ILM 1149 (1992), 95 ILR 645 (1992)

Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen (Den. v. Nor.), 1993 ICJ 38 (June 14)

US v. Alaska 117 S. Ct. 1888 (1997)

The M/V “Saiga”, Request for Prompt Release (St. Vincent v. Guinea) (Dec. 4, 1997), available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

The M/V “Saiga” (No. 2), Order on Provisional Measures (St. Vincent v. Guinea) (Mar. 11, 1998), Verbatim Record, ITLOS/PV.98/2, pp. 7–8 available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

The M/V “Saiga” (No. 2), Order on Provisional Measures (St. Vincent v. Guinea) (Mar. 11, 1998) available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Para. v. U.S.A.), Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures, Order, 1998 ICJ, (Apr. 9)

In the Matter of an Arbitration Pursuance to an Agreement to Arbitrate dated 3 October 1996 between the Government of the State of Eritrea and the Government of the Republic of Yemen (Eri./Yemen) (Award of the Arbitral Tribunal in the First Stage of the Proceedings (Territorial Sovereignty and Scope of the Dispute), Oct. 9, 1998), available athttp://pca7-cpa.org/RPC/#Eritrea

LaGrand (F.R.G. v. U.S.), Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures, Order, 1999 ICJ, (Mar. 3)

Difference Relating to Immunity from Legal Process of a Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights, Advisory Opinion, 1999 ICJ (Apr. 29)

M/V “Saiga” (No. 2), Merits (St. Vincent v. Guinea) (Judgment of July 1, 1999), available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

In the Matter of an Arbitration Pursuant to an Agreement to Arbitrate dated 3 October 1996 between the Government of the State of Eritrea and the Government of the Republic of Yemen (Eri./Yemen) (Award of the Arbitral Tribunal in the Second Stage of the Proceedings (Maritime Delimitation), Dec. 17, 1999) available athttp://pca-cpa.org/RPC/#Eritrea

Southern Bluefin Tuna, Requests for Provisional Measures (N.Z. v. Japan; Austl. v. Japan) (Order of Aug. 27, 1999), available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

Southern Bluefin Tuna, Requests for Provisional Measures (N.Z. v. Japan; Austl. v. Japan) (Order of Aug, 27, 1999), Verbatim Records, ITLOS/PV.99/20, p. 23, available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

Southern Bluefin Tuna, Requests for Provisional Measures (N.Z. v. Japan; Austl. v. Japan) (Order of Aug. 27, 1999), Verbatim Records, ITLOS/PV.99/21, p. 24 available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

Southern Bluefin Tuna, Requests for Provisional Measures (N.Z. v. Japan; Austl. v. Japan) (Order of Aug. 27, 1999), Verbatim Records, ITLOS/PV.99/23, p. 9 available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

“Camouco,” Application for Prompt Release (Pan. v. Fr.) Verbatim Record, ITLOS PV-00/1, p. 26 available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

“Camouco,” Application for Prompt Release (Pan. v. Fr.) Verbatim Record, ITLOS PV-00/2, p. 17 available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

“Camouco,” Application for Prompt Release (Pan. v. Fr.) Verbatim Record, ITLOS PV-00/3, p. 5 available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

“Camouco,” Application for Prompt Release (Pan. v. Fr.) (Judgment of Feb. 7, 2000) available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

In the Dispute Concerning Southern Bluefin Tuna, Australia v. Japan, Statement of Claim and Grounds on Which it is Based, para. 69 available athttp://www.worldbank.org/icsid/bluefintuna/main.htm

Southern Bluefin Tuna Case – Australia and New Zealand v. Japan, Government of Japan, Memorial on Jurisdiction, available athttp://www.worldbank.org/icsid/bluefintuna/main.htm

Southern Bluefin Tuna Case – Australia and New Zealand v. Japan, Australia and New Zealand, Reply on Jurisdiction, Volume 1, Text, Mar. 31, 2000 available athttp://www.worldbank.org/icsid/bluefintuna/main.htm

Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases – Australia and New Zealand v. Japan, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, (Austl. v. Japan; N.Z. v. Japan) (Arbitral Tribunal constituted under Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Aug. 4, 2000), 39 ILM 1359 (2000)

“Monte Confurco,” Application for Prompt Release (Sey. v. Fr.), (Judgment of Dec. 18, 2000), Verbatim Record, ITLOS PV.00/8, p. 11, available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

“Monte Confurco,” Application for Prompt Release (Sey. v. Fr.), (Judgment of Dec. 18, 2000), available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

Case Concerning Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain (Qatar v. Bahr.), 2001 ICJ (Mar. 16)

“Grand Prince,” Application for Prompt Release, (Belize v. Fr.) (Judgment of Apr. 20, 2001) available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

LaGrand (F.R.G. v. U.S.) 2001 ICJ (June 27), available athttp://www.icj-cij.org/icjwww/idocket/igus/igusframe.htm

In the Dispute Concerning the MOX Plant, International Movements of Radioactive Materials, and the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Irish Sea, (Ireland v. U.K.) Request for Provisional Measures and Statement of Case of Ireland, Nov. 9, 2001 available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

The MOX Plant Case (Ir. v. U.K.), Request for Provisional Measures (Order of Dec. 3, 2001) available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

“Volga,” Application for Prompt Release, (Russ. v. Austl.), Memorial of the Russian Federation, available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

The “Volga” Case, Statement in Response of Australia, Dec. 7, 2002, available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

“Volga,” Application for Prompt Release, (Russ. v. Austl.) (Judgment of Dec. 23, 2002) available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

In the Dispute Concerning the MOX Plant, International Movements of Radioactive Materials, and the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Irish Sea, Part II, para. 6.7 (July 26, 2002), available athttp://www.pca-cpa.org/PDF/Ireland%20Memorial%20Part%20II.pdf

The MOX Plant Case, (Ir. v. U.K.) Counter-Memorial of the United Kingdom, Jan. 9, 2003, available athttp://www.pca-cpa.org/ENGLISH/RPC/

In the Dispute Concerning the MOX Plant, International Movements of Radioactive Materials, and the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Irish Sea, (Ir. v. U.K.) Reply of Ireland, Mar. 7, 2003 available athttp://www.pca-cpa.org/ENGLISH/RPC/

The MOX Plant Case, (Ir. v. U.K.) Rejoinder of the United Kingdom, Apr. 24, 2003, available athttp://www.pca-cpa.org/ENGLISH/RPC/

MOX Plant, Day 2 Transcript, available athttp://www.pca-cpa.org/PDF/MOX%20-%20Day%20Two.pdf

Case Concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore In and around the Straits of Johor (Malay. v. Sing.), Request for the Prescription of Provisional Measures under Article 290, Paragraph 5, of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Response of Singapore (Sept. 20), available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

Case Concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Malay. v. Sing.), Request for Provisional Measures, Verbatim Record, ITLOS/PV.03/02/Corr.1, p. 23, available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

Case Concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Malay. v. Sing.), Request for Provisional Measures, Verbatim Record, ITLOS/PV.03/03, available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

Case concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor, Request for Provisional Measures, Malay. v. Sing., Verbatim Record, ITLOS/PV.03/05, p. 10. available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

Case concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Malay. v. Sing.), Request for Provisional Measures (Order of Oct. 8, 2003) available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

MOX Plant, Statement of the President, June 13, 2003, available athttp://www.pca-cpa.org/ENGLISH/RPC/

Arbitral Tribunal Constituted Pursuant to Article 287, and Article 1 of Annex VII, of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea for the Dispute Concerning the MOX Plant, International Movements of Radioactive Materials, and the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Irish Sea, The MOX Plant Case (Ir. v. U.K) Order No. 3, Suspension of Proceedings on Jurisdiction and Merits, and Request for Further Provisional Measures, June 24, 2003 available athttp://www.pca-cpa.org/ENGLISH/RPC/

Arbitral Tribunal Constituted Pursuant to Article 287, and Article 1 of Annex VII, of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea for the Dispute Concerning the MOX Plant, International Movements of Radioactive Materials, and the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Irish Sea, The MOX Plant Case (Ir. v. U.K) Order No. 4, Further Suspension of Proceedings on Jurisdiction and Merits, Nov. 14, 2003 available at http://www.pca-cpa.org/ENGLISH/RPC/

Treaty of Amity, Commerce and Navigation, Nov. 19, 1794, U.S.-U.K., 1794, 8 Stat. 116 [Jay Treaty]

Convention [No. I] Regarding the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, July 29, 1899, 32 Stat. 1779, 1 Bevans 230

Convention [No. VI] Relating to the Status of Enemy Merchant Ships at the Outbreak of Hostilities, Oct. 18, 1907, 100 Brit & Foreign St. Papers 365 (1906–07), reprinted in The Law of Naval Warfare: A Collection of Agreements and Documents with Commentaries 96 (N. Ronzitti, ed., 1988)

Convention [No. VII] Relating to the Conversion of Merchant Ships to Warships Oct. 18, 1907, 100 Brit & Foreign St. Papers 377 (1906–07), reprinted in The Law of Naval Warfare: A Collection of Agreements and Documents with Commentaries 114 (N. Ronzitti, ed., 1988)

Convention [No. VIII] Relative to the Laying of Automatic Submarine Contact Mines, Oct. 18, 1907, 36 Stat. 2332, 1 Bevans 669

Convention [No. IX] Concerning Bombardment by Naval Forces in Time of War, Oct. 18, 1907, 36 Stat. 2351, 1 Bevans 681

Convention [No. XI] Relative to Certain Restrictions with Regard to the Exercise of the Right of Capture in Naval War, Oct. 18, 1907, 36 Stat. 2396, 1 Bevans 711

Convention [No. XIII] Concerning the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers in Naval War, Oct. 18, 1907, 36 Stat. 2415, 1 Bevans 723

Treaty between Great Britain and the United States for the Protection of Fur Seals, Feb. 7, 1911, U.K.-U.S., 37 Stat. 1538. Modified by Convention between Great Britain, Japan, Russia and the United States respecting Measures for the Preservation and Protection of Fur Seals in the North Pacific Ocean, July 7, 1911, 37 Stat. 1542

Covenant of the League of Nations (1919)

Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice (1919)

Treaty between His Majesty in Respect of the United Kingdom and the President of the United States of Venezuela Relating to the Submarine Areas of the Gulf Paria, Feb. 26, 1942, 1942 U.K.T.S. No. 10

United Nations Charter (1945)

Statute of the International Court of Justice (1945)

Presidential Proclamation No. 2667, 28 Sept., 1945, 59 Stat. 884

Presidential Proclamation No. 2668, 28 Sept., 1945, 59 Stat. 885

International Convention for the Prevention of the Pollution of the Sea by Oil, May 12, 1954, 12 UST 2989; 327 UNTS 3

Treaty Establishing the European Economic Community, Mar. 25, 1957, art. 186, 298 UNTS 3

Convention on the Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone, Apr. 29 1958, 15 UST 1606, 516 UNTS 205

Convention on the High Seas, Apr. 29 1958, 13 UST 2312, 450 UNTS 82

Convention on Fishing and Conservation of the Living Resources of the High Seas, Apr. 29 1958, 17 UST 138, 559 UNTS 285

Convention on the Continental Shelf, Apr. 29 1958, 15 UST 1171, 499 UNTS 311

Optional Protocol of Signature Concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes, Adopted by the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, Apr. 29 1958, 450 UNTS 172

International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, May 18, 1967, 17 UST 1523, 600 UNTS 332, as modified by Protocol of 1978 relating thereto, June 1, 1978, 17 ILM 546 (1978)

International Convention Relating to Intervention on the High Seas in Cases of Oil Pollution Casualties, Nov. 29, 1969, 26 UST 765

Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, Dec. 29, 1972, 26 UST 2403, 1046 UNTS 120

Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, May 21, 1980, 33 UST 3476

Agreement Concerning Interim Arrangements Relating to Polymetallic Nodules of the Deep Sea Bed, Sept. 2, 1982, 21 ILM 950 (1982)

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, opened for signature December 10, 1982, 1833 UNTS 397

Final Act of the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, available athttp://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/final_act_eng.pdf

Agreement on the United States' Actions Concerning the Conference on the Law of the Sea, II Pub. Papers 911 (July 9, 1982)

Provisional Understanding Regarding Deep Seabed Mining, Aug. 3, 1984, 23 ILM 1354 (entered into force Sept. 2, 1984)

Agreement of the Resolution of Practical Problems With Respect to Deep Seabed Mining Areas, and Exchange of Notes Between the United States and the Parties to the Agreement, Aug. 14, 1987, 26 ILM 1502

Joint Statement with Attached Uniform Interpretation of Rules of International Law Governing Innocent Passage, Sept. 23, 1989, US-USSR, 28 ILM 1444

International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Co-operation, Nov. 30 1990, 30 ILM 773 (1991)

Treaty on European Union (Maastricht) Feb. 7, 1992, (1992) 31 ILM 247

Convention for the Conservation of Bluefin Tuna, May 10, 1993, Austl.-N.Z.-Japan, May 10, 1993, 1819 UNTS 360 (entered into force May 30, 1994)

Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, Legal Instruments – Results of the Uruguay Round vol. 31; 33 ILM 81 (1994)

Agreement Relating to the Implementation of Part XI of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Nov. 16, 1994, S. Treaty Doc. No. 104–24, 1836 UNTS 3 (1995)

Arbitration Agreement, Oct. 3, 1996, Eri.-Yemen, available athttp://www.pca-cpa.org/RPC/arbagreeER-YE.htm

Declaration concerning the competence of the European Community with regard to matters governed by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 and the Agreement of 28 July 1994 relating to the implementation of Part XI of the Convention, (April 1, 1998) available athttp://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_declarations.htm#European%20Community%20Declaration%20made%20upon%20formal%20confirmation

Rules of the Tribunal (ITLOS/8), as amended on 15 March and 21 September 2001, available athttp://www.itlos.org/start2_en.html

Abbot, Kenneth W., “Modern International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers,” 14 Yale J. Int'l L.335 (1989)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “The System for Exploitation of the ‘Common Heritage of Mankind’ at the Caracas Conference,” 69 Am. J. Int'l L.31 (1975)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “Settlement of Disputes Arising under the Law of the Sea Convention,” 69 Am. J. Int'l L.795 (1975)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “Settlement of Disputes Arising under the Law of the Sea Convention,” 71 Am. J. Int'l L.305 (1977)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “Prolegomena to the Dispute Settlement Part of the Law of the Sea Convention,” 10 NYU J Int'l L & PoL.253 (1977–78)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “Settlement of Disputes Arising under the Law of the Sea Convention,” 72 Am. J. Int'l L.84 (1978)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “Toward the Formulation of the Rule of Delimitation of Sea Boundaries between States with Opposite or Adjacent Coasts,” 19 Va. J. Int'l L.209 (1978–79)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “Streamlining the System for Settlement of Disputes under the Law of the Sea Convention,” 1 Pace L. Rev.15 (1980)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “Environmental Disputes under the Law of the Sea Convention,” 7 Envtl. Pol'y & L.63 (1981)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., “The Basic Structure of the Disputes Settlement Part of the Law of the Sea Convention,” 11 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.125 (1982)Google Scholar

Adede, A. O., The System for Settlement of Disputes Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (1987)

Alexander, Lewis M., “International Straits,” in 64 International Law Studies: The Law of Naval Operations (Horace B. Robertson ed., 1991), p. 91

Anand, R. P., “The Politics of a New Legal Order for Fisheries,” 11 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.265 (1982)Google Scholar

Astley, John III, and Schmitt, Michael N., “The Law of the Sea and Naval Operations,” 42 Air Force L. Rev.119 (1997)Google Scholar

Attard, David Joseph, The Exclusive Economic Zone in International Law (1987)

Banks, Susan M., “Protection of Investment in Deep Seabed Mining: Does the United States have a Viable Alternative to Participation in UNCLOS?,” 2 Boston Univ. Int'l L. J.267 (1983)Google Scholar

Barkenbus, J., Deep Seabed Resources (1979)

Bergman, Mark S., “The Regulation of Seabed Mining Under the Reciprocating States Regime,” 30 Am. Univ. L. Rev.477 (1981)Google Scholar

Bernhardt, J. P. A., “Compulsory Dispute Settlement in the Law of the Sea Negotiations: A Reassessment,” 19 Va. J. Int'l L.69 (1978–79)Google Scholar

Bernhardt, J. P. A., “The Right of Archipelagic Sea Lanes Passage: A Primer,” 35 Va. J. Int'l L.719 (1995)Google Scholar

Bilder, R. B., “Some Limitations of Adjudication as a Dispute Settlement Technique,” 23 Va. J. Int'l L.1 (1982–83)Google Scholar

Birnie, Patricia, “Law of the Sea and Ocean Resources: Implications for Marine Scientific Research,” 10 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.229 (1995)Google Scholar

Bishop, William W. Jr., “International Law Commission Draft Articles on Fisheries,” 50 Am. J. Int'l L.627 (1956)Google Scholar

Blum, Yehuda Z., “The Gulf of Sidra Incident,” 80 Am. J. Int'l L.668 (1986)Google Scholar

Boggs, S. Whittemore, “Delimitation of the Territorial Sea: The Method of Delimitation Proposed by the Delegation of the United States at the Hague Conference for the Codification of International Law,” 24 Am. J. Int'l L.541 (1930)Google Scholar

Boggs, S. Whittemore, “Problems of Water-Boundary Definition: Median Line and International Boundaries Through Territorial Waters,” 27 Geographical Rev.445 (1937)Google Scholar

Booth, Kenneth, “The Military Implications of the Changing Law of the Sea,” in Law of the Sea: Neglected Issues 328 (John King Gamble, Jr., ed., 1979)

Bouchez, L. J., The Regime of Bays in International Law (1964)

Bowett, D. W., “The Second United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea,” 9 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.415 (1960)Google Scholar

Boyle, A. E., “Problems of Compulsory Jurisdiction and the Settlement of Disputes Relating to Straddling Fish Stocks,” 14 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.1 (1999)Google Scholar

Boyle, Alan E., “Marine Pollution under the Law of the Sea Convention,” 79 Am. J. Int'l L.347 (1985)Google Scholar

Boyle, Alan E., “Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction,” 46 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.37 (1997)Google Scholar

Boyle, Alan E., “UNCLOS, the Marine Environment and the Settlement of Disputes,” in Competing Norms in the Law of Marine Environmental Protection – Focus on Ship Safety and Pollution Prevention (Henrik Ringbom ed., 1997), p. 241

Boyle, Francis Anthony, Foundations of World Order: The Legalist Approach to International Relations, 1898–1922 (1999)

Bozcek, Boleslaw A., “Peacetime Military Activities in the Exclusive Economic Zones of Third Countries,” 19 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.445 (1988)Google Scholar

Bozcek, Boleslaw A., “Peaceful Purposes Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 20 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.359 (1989)Google Scholar

Breen, James H., “The 1982 Dispute Resolving Agreement: The First Step Toward Unilateral Mining Outside the Law of the Sea Convention,” 14 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.201 (1984)Google Scholar

Brewer, William C., “Deep Seabed Mining: Can An Acceptable Regime Ever be Found?,” 11 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.25 (1982)Google Scholar

Briggs, Herbert W., “The Optional Protocols of Geneva (1958) and Vienna (1961, 1963) Concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes,” in Recueil D'études de Droit International: en Hommage à Paul Gugenheim (1968), p. 628

Brilmayer, Lea and Klein, Natalie, “Land and Sea: Two Sovereignty Regimes in Search of a Common Denominator,” 33 NYU J. Int'l L & PoL.703 (2001)Google Scholar

Broadus, J. M., and Hoagland, III, Porter, “Conflict Resolution in the Assignment of Area Entitlements for Seabed Mining,” 21 San Diego L. Rev.541 (1984)Google Scholar

Brooke, Robert L. “The Current Status of Deep Seabed Mining,” 24 Va. J. Int'l L.361 (1984)Google Scholar

Brown, E. D., and Churchill, R. R., eds., The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: Impact and Implementation (1989)

Brown, E. D., “Dispute settlement and the law of the sea: the UN Convention regime,” 21 Marine Pol'y 17 (1997)Google Scholar

Brown, E. D., “The M/V ‘Saiga’ case on prompt release of detained vessels: the first Judgment of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” 22 Marine Pol'y307 (1998)Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian, “The Relation of Law and Power,” in Contemporary Problems of International Law: Essays in Honour of Georg Schwarzenberger (Bin Cheng and E. D. Brown eds., 1988), p. 19

Brownlie, Ian, “The Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes in Practice,” 7 Pace Int'l L. Rev.257 (1995)Google Scholar

Brus, Marcel M. T. A., Third Party Dispute Settlement in an Interdependent World (1995)

Burke, Karin M., and DeLeo, Deborah A., “Innocent Passage and Transit Passage in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 9 Yale J. World Pub. Ord.389 (1983)Google Scholar

Burke, William T., “Some Comments on the 1958 Conventions,” in Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its Fifty-Third Annual Meeting, April 30–May 2, 1959 (1959), p. 197

Burke, William T., “National Legislation on Ocean Authority Zones and the Contemporary Law of the Sea,” 9 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.289 (1981)Google Scholar

Burke, William T., “Exclusive Fisheries Zones and Freedom of Navigation,” 20 San Diego L. Rev.595 (1983)Google Scholar

Burke, William T., “The Law of the Sea Convention Provisions on Conditions of Access to Fisheries Subject to National Jurisdiction,” 63 Oregon L. Rev.73 (1984)Google Scholar

Burke, William T., The New International Law of Fisheries: UNCLOS 1982 and Beyond (1994)

Burke, William T., “Implications for Fisheries Management of U.S. Acceptance of the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 89 Am. J. Int'l L.792 (1995)Google Scholar

Burke, William T., International Law of the Sea: Documents and Notes (1995)

Burke, William T., “Evolution in the Fisheries Provisions of UNCLOS,” in Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda (N. Ando et al. eds., 2002), p. 1355

Buzan, Barry, Seabed Politics (1976)

Buzan, Barry, “Naval Power, the Law of the Sea, and the Indian Ocean as a Zone of Peace,” 5 Marine Pol'y194 (1981)Google Scholar

Carlston, Kenneth S., The Process of International Arbitration (1946)

Carlston, Kenneth S., “Codification of International Arbitral Procedure,” 47 Am. J. Int'l L.218 (1955)Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, International Law in a Divided World (1986)

Castañeda, Jorge, “Negotiations on the Exclusive Economic Zone at the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea,” in Essays in International Law in Honour of Judge Manfred Lachs 605 (Jerzy Makarczyk ed., 1984)

Chappell, D., “Conference on the Law of the Sea,” 1 Tasm. U. L. Rev.323 (1959)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “Ocean Boundaries between Nations: A Theory for Progress,” 78 Am. J. Int'l L.582 (1984)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “The Law of the Deep Seabed Post UNCLOS III,” 63 Oregon L. Rev.19 (1984)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “The Exclusive Economic Zone and Public International Law,” 15 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.233 (1985)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “The United States and the Revision of the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 23 Ocean Dev. Int'l L.279 (1992)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “Progress in International Maritime Boundary Delimitation Law,” 88 Am. J. Int'l L.227 (1994)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “The Marine Environment and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 28 Int'l Law. 879 (1994) [Charney, “Marine Environment”]Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “U.S. Provisional Application of the 1994 Deep Seabed Agreement,” 88 Am. J. Int'l L.705 (1994)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “Entry into Force of the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 35 Va. J. Int'l L.381 (1995)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “The Protection of the Marine Environment by the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.731 (1995) [Charney, “Protection of the Marine Environment”]Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “The Implications of Expanding International Dispute Settlement Systems: The 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 90 Am. J. Int'l L.69 (1996)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “Third Party Dispute Settlement and International Law,” 36 Colum. J. Transnat'l L.65 (1997)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., “Rocks that Cannot Sustain Human Habitation,” 93 Am. J. Int'l L.863 (1999)Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan I., and Alexander, Lewis M., International Maritime Boundaries (1996)

Cheng, Bin, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (1987)

Chinkin, Christine M., “Crisis and the Performance of International Agreements,” 7 Yale J. World Pub. Ord.177 (1981)Google Scholar

Christy, Francis T. Jr., “Transitions in the Management and Distribution of International Fisheries,” 31 Int'l Org.235 (1977)Google Scholar

Churchill, R. R., and Lowe, A. V., The Law of the Sea (1983)

Churchill, R. R., and Lowe, A. V., The Law of the Sea (3rd ed., 1999)

Clark, M. Wesley, Historic Bays and Waters: A Regime of Recent Beginnings and Continued Usage (1994)

Clingan, Thomas A., The Law of the Sea: Ocean Law and Policy (1994)

Collier, John, and Lowe, Vaughan, The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures (1999)

Colombos, C. John, The International Law of the Sea (6th ed., revised, 1967)

Colson, David A., “United States Accession to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.651 (1995)Google Scholar

Cooling Haerr, Roger, “The Gulf of Sidra,” 24 San Diego L. Rev.751 (1987)Google Scholar

Copes, P., “The Impact of UNCLOS III on Management of the World's Fisheries,” 5 Mar. Pol'y217 (1981)Google Scholar

Cory, Helen May, Compulsory Arbitration of International Disputes (1932)

Curtis, Clifton E., “The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Marine Environment: A Non-Governmental Perspective,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.739 (1995)Google Scholar

Amato, Anthony, “An Alternative to the Law of the Sea Convention,” 77 Am. J. Int'l L.281 (1983)Google Scholar

Damrosch, L. F., ed., The International Court of Justice at a Crossroads (1987)

De Mestral, A. L. C., “Compulsory Dispute Settlement in the Third United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: A Canadian Perspective,” in Contemporary Issues in International Law, Essays in Honor of Louis B. Sohn (Thomas Buergenthal ed., 1984)

Dean, Arthur H., “The Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea: What was Accomplished,” 52 Am. J. Int'l L.607 (1958)Google Scholar

Dean, Arthur H., “Achievements at the Law of the Sea Conference,” in Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its Fifty-Third Annual Meeting, April 30–May 2, 1959 (1959), p. 186

Dean, Arthur H., “The Second Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea: The Fight for Freedom of the Sea,” 54 Am. J. Int'l L.751 (1960)Google Scholar

Doran, Walter F., “An Operational Commander's Perspective on the 1982 LOS Convention,” 10 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.335 (1995)Google Scholar

Doswald-Beck, Louise ed., San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea (1995)

Duff, John Alton, “UNCLOS and the New Deep Seabed Mining Regime: The Risks of Refuting the Treaty,” 19 Suffolk Transnational L. Rev.1 (1995)Google Scholar

Dupuy, René-Jean and Vignes, Daniel, eds., A Handbook on the New Law of the Sea (1991)

Elias, T. O., “The Commission of Mediation, Conciliation and Arbitration of the Organization of African Unity,” 40 Brit. Y. B. Int'l L.336 (1964)Google Scholar

Evans, Malcolm D., Relevant Circumstances and Maritime Delimitation (1989)

Evans, Malcolm D., “Maritime Delimitation and Expanding Categories of Relevant Circumstances,” 40 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.1 (1990)Google Scholar

Evans, Malcolm D., “The Southern Bluefin Tuna Dispute: Provisional Thinking on Provisional Measures?,” 10 Y. B. Int'l Envtl L.7 (1999) [Evans, “Southern Bluefin Tuna”]Google Scholar

Evriviades, Euripides L., “The Third World's Approach to the Deep Seabed,” 11 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.201 (1982)Google Scholar

Fabra, Adriana, “The LOSC and the Implementation of the Precautionary Principle,” 10 Y.B. Int'l Envtl L.15 (1999)Google Scholar

Falk, R. A., “Realistic Horizons for International Adjudication,” 11 Va. J. Int'l L.314 (1970–71)Google Scholar

Fentress, Marvin A., “Maritime Boundary Dispute Settlement: The Nonemergence of Guiding Principles,” 15 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L.591 (1985)Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Gerald, “Some Results of the Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea: Part 1 – The Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone and Related Topics,” 8 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.73 (1959)Google Scholar

Fox, H., “States and the Undertaking to Arbitrate,” 37 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.1 (1988)Google Scholar

Francioni, Francesco, “Peacetime Use of Force, Military Activities, and the New Law of the Sea,” 18 Cornell Int'l L. J.203 (1985)Google Scholar

Franckx, Eric, “‘Reasonable Bond’ in the Practice of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” 32 Cal. W. Int'l L. J.303 (2002)Google Scholar

Franklin, Carl M., “The Law of the Sea: Some Recent Developments (With Particular Reference to the United Nations Conference of 1958),” 53 Int'l L. Studies1 (1959–60)Google Scholar

Freestone, David, “The Effective Conservation and Management of High Seas Living Resources: Towards a New Regime?,” 5 Canterbury L. Rev.341 (1994)Google Scholar

Friedham, Robert L., and Durch, William J., “The International Seabed Resources Agency Negotiations and the New International Economic Order,” 31 Int'l Org.343 (1977)Google Scholar

Friedman, A. G., and Williams, C. A., “The Group of 77 at the United Nations: An Emergent Force in the Law of the Sea,” 16 San Diego L. Rev.555 (1978–79)Google Scholar

Gaertner, Marianne P., “The Dispute Settlement Provisions of the Convention on the Law of the Sea: Critique and Alternatives to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” 19 San Diego L. Rev.577 (1982)Google Scholar

Galdorisi, George, “The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: A National Security Perspective,” 89 Am. J. Int'l L.208 (1995)Google Scholar

Galdorisi, George, “The United States Freedom of Navigation Program: A Bridge for International Compliance with the 1982 United Nations Convention on the law of the Sea,” 27 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.399 (1996)Google Scholar

Gamble, John King Jr., “The Law of the Sea Conference: Dispute Settlement in Perspective,” 9 Vand J. Int'l L.323 (1976)Google Scholar

Gamble, John King Jr., “Assessing the Reality of the Deep Seabed Regime,” 22 San Diego L. Rev.779 (1985)Google Scholar

Gamble, John King Jr., “The 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: Binding Dispute Settlement?,” 9 B. U. Int'l L.J.39 (1991)Google Scholar

Gautier, Phillipe, “Interim Measures of Protection Before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” in Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Myron H. Nordquist and John Norton Moore eds., 2001), p. 243

Gioia, Andrea, “Tunisia's Claims over Adjacent Seas and the Doctrine of ‘Historic Rights,’” 11 Syr. J. Int'l L. & Com.327 (1984)Google Scholar

Gonsiorowski, M., “Political Arbitration under the General Act of Pacific Settlement of Disputes,” 27 Am. J. Int'l L.469 (1933)Google Scholar

Gray, Christine, and Kingsbury, Benedict, “Developments in Dispute Settlement Inter-State Arbitration Since 1945,” 63 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.97 (1992)Google Scholar

Grolin, Jesper, “The Future of the Law of the Sea: Consequences of a Non-Treaty or Non-Universal Treaty Situation,” 13 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.1 (1983)Google Scholar

Grotius, Hugo, The Freedom of the Seas or the Right which Belongs to the Dutch to Take Part in the East Indian Trade (Ralph Magoffin trans., James Brown Scott ed., Oxford Univ. Press 1916) (1633)

Grotius, Hugo, The Rights of War and Peace (A. C. Campbell trans., Introduction by David J. Hill, Universal Classic Library ed., 1901) (1646)

Grunawalt, Richard J., “United States Policy on International Straits,” 18 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.445 (1987)Google Scholar

Guillaume, Gilbert, “The Future of International Judicial Institutions,” 44 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.849 (1995)Google Scholar

Gutteridge, J. A. C., “The 1958 Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf,” 35 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.102 (1959)Google Scholar

Hafetz, Jonathan L., “Fostering Protection of the Marine Environment and Economic Development: Article 121(3) of the Third Law of the Sea Convention,” 15 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 584 (2000)

Haggard, Stephan, and Simmons, Beth A., “Theories of International Regimes,” 41 I nt'l Org.491 (1987)Google Scholar

Hardy, Michael, “The Law of the Sea and the Prospects for Deep Seabed Mining: The Position of the European Community,” 17 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.309 (1986)Google Scholar

Harlow, Bruce A., “UNCLOS III and Conflict Management in Straits,” 15 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.197 (1985)Google Scholar

Hayashi, Moritaka, “Japan and Deep Seabed Mining,” 17 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.351 (1986)Google Scholar

Hayashi, Moritaka, “The Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases: Prescription of Provisional Measures by the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” 13 Tul. Envtl L. J.361 (2000)Google Scholar

Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolff, “The Law of Armed Conflict at Sea,” in Handbook of Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts (Dieter Fleck ed., 1995), p. 403

Horowitz, Deborah, “The Catch of Poseidon's Trident: The Fate of High Seas Fisheries in the Southern Bluefin Tuna Case,” 25 Melb. Univ. L.R.810 (2001)Google Scholar

Howe, Nick, “ITLOS – A Practitioner's Perspective,” in Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Myron H. Nordquist and John Norton Moore eds., 2001), p. 159

Hudson, Manley O., “The First Conference for the Codification of International Law,” 24 Am. J. Int'l L.447 (1930)Google Scholar

Hudson, Manley O., International Tribunals: Past and Future (1944)

Hurst, Sir Cecil, “Whose is the Sea Bed?,” 4 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.34 (1923–24)Google Scholar

Hutchinson, D. N., “The seaward limit to continental shelf jurisdiction in customary international law,” 56 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.112 (1986)Google Scholar

International Maritime Organization, Guidance for Ships Transiting Archipelagic Waters, IMO SN/Circ.206, January 8, 1999

Irwin, P. C., “Settlement of Maritime Boundary Disputes: An Analysis of the Law of the Sea Negotiations,” 8 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.51 (1980)Google Scholar

Jacovides, Andreas J., “Peaceful Settlement of Disputes in Ocean Conflicts: Does UNCLOS III Point the Away?,” in Contemporary Issues in International Law, Essays in Honor of Louis B. Sohn (Thomas Buergenthal ed., 1984), p. 165

Jaenicke, Günther, “Dispute Settlement under the Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 43 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht813 (1983)Google Scholar

Jagota, S. P., Maritime Boundary (1985)

Janis, Mark, Sea Power and the Law of the Sea (1976)

Janis, Mark W., “Dispute Settlement in the Law of the Sea Convention: The Military Activities Exception,” 4 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.51 (1977)Google Scholar

Jenks, C. Wilfred, The Prospects of International Adjudication (1964)

Jennings, Robert Y., “The Principles Governing Marine Boundaries,” in Staat und Völkerrechtsordnung: Festschrift für Karl Doehring (Kay Hailbronner et al. eds., 1989), p. 397

Jessup, Philip, The Law of Territorial Waters and Maritime Jurisdiction (1927)

Jessup, Philip C., “The International Law Commission's 1954 Report on the Regime of the Territorial Sea,” 49 Am. J. Int'l L.221 (1955)Google Scholar

Jessup, Philip C., “Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea: A Study in International Law-Making,” 52 Am. J. Int'l L.730 (1958)Google Scholar

Jessup, Philip C., “The United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea,” 59 Colum. L. Rev.234 (1959)Google Scholar

Jessup, Philip C., “The Law of the Sea Around Us,” 55 Am. J. Int'l L.104 (1961)Google Scholar

Johnson, D. H. N., “The Preparation of the 1958 Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea,” 8 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.123 (1959)Google Scholar

Johnson, D. H. N., “International Arbitration Back in Favour?,” 34 Y.B. World Aff.305 (1980)Google Scholar

Johnston, Douglas M., “Fishery Diplomacy and Science and the Judicial Function,” 10 Y.B. Int'l Envtl L.33 (1999)Google Scholar

Jones, William B., “Risk Assessment: Corporate Ventures in Deep Seabed Mining Outside the Framework of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 16 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.241 (1986)Google Scholar

Joyner, Christopher C., “Compliance and Enforcement in New International Fisheries Law,” 12 Temp. Int'l & Comp. L.J.271 (1998)Google Scholar

Juda, Lawrence, “The Exclusive Economic Zone: Compatibility of National Claims and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 16 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.1 (1986)Google Scholar

Kass, S. L., “Obligatory Negotiations in International Organisations,” 3 Can. Y.B. Int'l L.36 (1965)Google Scholar

Kaye, Lawrence Wayne, “The Innocent Passage of Warships in Foreign Territorial Seas: A Threatened Freedom,” 15 San Diego L. Rev.573 (1978)Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (1984)

Keohane, Robert O., International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory (1989)

Kibola, Hamisi S., “A Note on Africa and the Exclusive Economic Zone,” 16 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.369 (1986)Google Scholar

Kimball, Lee, “Turning Points in the Future of Deep Seabed Mining,” 17 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.367 (1986)Google Scholar

Kimball, Lee, “The Law of the Sea Convention and Marine Environment Protection,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.745 (1995)Google Scholar

Kindt, John Warren, “Dispute Settlement in International Environmental Issues: The Model Provided by the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 22 Vand. J. Transnat'l L.1097 (1989)Google Scholar

Knight, H. G., Consequences of Non-Agreement at the Third UN Law of the Sea Conference (1976)

Koh, Kwang Lim, “The Continental Shelf and the International Law Commission,” 35 B.U.L. Rev.523 (1955)Google Scholar

Koh, Tommy T. B., “Negotiating a New World Order for the Sea,” 24 Va. J. Int'l L.761 (1984)Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen D., “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables,” in International Regimes (Stephen D. Krasner ed., 1983), p. 1

Kronmiller, T., The Lawfulness of Deep Seabed Mining (1980)

Kwiatkowska, Barbara, The 200 Mile Exclusive Economic Zone in the New Law of the Sea (1989)

Kwiatkowska, Barbara, “The High Seas Fisheries Regime: at a Point of No Return?,” 8 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.327 (1993)Google Scholar

Kwiatkowska, Barbara, “Inauguration of the ITLOS Jurisprudence: The Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea M/V Saiga Case,” 30 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.43 (1999)Google Scholar

Kwiatkowska, Barbara, “The Southern Bluefin Tuna (New Zealand v Japan; Australia v Japan) Cases,” 15 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L. 1 (2000) [Kwiatkowska, “Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases”]

Kwiatkowska, Barbara, “Southern Bluefin Tuna (Australia and New Zealand v. Japan). Jurisdiction and Admissibility,” 95 Am. J. Int'l L.162 (2001) [Kwiatkowska, “Jurisdiction and Admissibility”]Google Scholar

Kwiatkowska, Barbara, “The Australia and New Zealand v. Japan Southern Bluefin Tuna (Jurisdiction and Admissibility) Award of the First Law of the Sea Convention Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal,” 16 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.239 (2001) [Kwiatkowska, “First Award”]Google Scholar

Kwiatkowska, Barbara, and Soons, Alfred H. A., “Entitlement to Maritime Areas of Rocks Which Cannot Sustain Human Habitation of Economic Life of Their Own,” 21 Neth. Y.B. Int'l L.139 (1990)Google Scholar

Laing, Edward Arthur, “ITLOS Procedures and Practices: Bonds,” in Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Myron H. Nordquist and John Norton Moore eds., 2001), p. 113

Larson, David L., “Security Issues and the Law of the Sea: A General Framework,” 15 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.99 (1985)Google Scholar

Larson, David L., “Deep Seabed Mining: A Definition of the Problem,” 17 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.271 (1986)Google Scholar

Larson, David L., “Innocent, Transit, and Archipelagic Sea Lanes Passage,” 18 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.411 (1987)Google Scholar

Larson, David L., “Naval Weaponry and the Law of the Sea,” 18 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.125 (1987)Google Scholar

Laslo, Ervin et al., The Objectives of the New International Economic Order (1979)

Lauterpacht, Eli, “The First Decision of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: The M/V Saiga,” in Liber Amicorum Professor Ignaz Seidl-Hohenveldern (Gerhard Hafner et al. eds., 1998), p. 395

Lauterpacht, Hersch, “Sovereignty Over Submarine Areas,” 27 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.376 (1950)Google Scholar

Leich, Marian Nash, “U.S. Practice, Indonesia: Archipelagic Waters,” 83 Am. J. Int'l L.558 (1989)Google Scholar

Lillich, Richard B., and Brower, Charles N., eds., International Arbitration in the 21st Century: Towards “Judicialization” and Uniformity?: the Twelfth Sokol Colloquium (1994)

Lowe, A. V., “The Commander's Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations and the Contemporary Law of the Sea,” in 64 International Law Studies: The Law of Naval Operations (Horace B. Robertson ed., 1991), p. 111

Lowe, Vaughan, “The Impact of the Law of the Sea on Naval Warfare,” 14 Syracuse J. Int'l L. & Comm.657 (1988)Google Scholar

Lowe, Vaughan, “The M/V Saiga: The First Case in the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” 48 Int'l & Comp. L. Q.187 (1999)Google Scholar

Malia, Gerald A., “The New ‘International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea’: Prospects for Dispute Resolution at the ‘Sea Court,’” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.791 (1995)Google Scholar

Malone, James L., “The United States and the Law of the Sea,” 24 Va. J. Int'l L. 785, 785–86 (1984)Google Scholar

Mangone, Gerard J., “Straits Used for International Navigation,” 18 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.391 (1987)Google Scholar

Manley, Robert H., “The Geneva Conferences on the Law of the Sea as a Step in the International Law-Making Process,” 25 Alb. L. Rev.17 (1961)Google Scholar

Manner, Eero J., “Settlement of Sea-Boundary Delimitation Disputes According to the Provisions of the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention,” in Essays in International Law in Honour of Judge Manfred Lachs (Jerzy Makarczyk ed., 1984), p. 625

de Marfy, Annick, “The Pardo Declaration and the Six Years of the Sea-Bed Committee,” in 1 A Handbook on the New Law of the Sea (René-Jean Dupuy and Daniel Vignes eds., 1991), p. 144

Martin, Will, “Fisheries Conservation and Management of Straddling Stocks and Highly Migratory Stocks under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.765 (1995)Google Scholar

Max Planck Institute, Judicial Settlement of International Disputes (1974)

McConnell, Moira L., and Gold, Edgar, “The Modern Law of the Sea: Framework for the Protection and Preservation of the Marine Environment?,” 23 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L.83 (1991)Google Scholar

McDorman, Ted L., “The Dispute Settlement Regime of the Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks Convention,” Canadian Y.B. Int'l L.57 (1997)Google Scholar

McDougal, Myres S., and Burke, William T., “Crisis in the Law of the Sea: Community Perspectives Versus National Egoism,” 67 Yale L. J.539 (1958)Google Scholar

McDougal, Myres S., and Burke, William T., The Public Order of the Oceans: A Contemporary International Law of the Sea (1962)

McDougal, Myres S., and Schlei, Norbert A., “The Hydrogen Bomb Tests in Perspective: Lawful Measures for Security,” 64 Yale L. J.648 (1955)Google Scholar

McNees, Richard B., “Freedom of Transit Through International Straits,” 6 J. Mar. L. & Com.175 (1974–75)Google Scholar

McNeill, John H., “The Strategic Significance of the Law of the Sea Convention,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.703 (1995)Google Scholar

Meltzer, Evelyne, “Global Overview of Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks: The Nonsustainable Nature of High Seas Fisheries,” 25 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.255 (1994)Google Scholar

Merrills, J. G., International Dispute Settlement (3rd ed., 1998)

Miles, Edward, “The Structure and Effects of the Decision Process in the Seabed Committee and the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea,” 31 Int'l Org.159 (1977)Google Scholar

Miles, Edward L., and Burke, William T., “Pressures on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 1982 Arising from New Fisheries Conflicts,” 20 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L.343 (1989)Google Scholar

Mirvahabi, Farin, “Fishery Disputes Settlement and the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea,” 57 Revue de Droit Int'l de Sciences Diplomatiques et Politiques45 (1979)Google Scholar

Molitor, Michael R., “The U.S. Deep Seabed Mining Regulations: The Legal Basis for an Alternative Regime,” 19 San Diego L. Rev.599 (1982)Google Scholar

Molitor, Steven J., “The Provisional Understanding Regarding Deep Seabed Matters: An Ill-Conceived Regime for U.S. Deep Seabed Mining,” 20 Cornell Int'l L. J.223 (1987)Google Scholar

Moore, John Norton, “The Regime of Straits and the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea,” 74 Am. J. Int'l L.77 (1980)Google Scholar

Moore, John Norton, “The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Rule of Law,” 7 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.645 (1995)Google Scholar

Morgan, Donald L., “A Practitioner's Critique of the Order Granting Provisional Measures in the Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases,” in Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Myron H. Nordquist and John Norton Moore eds., 2001), p. 173

Morgan, Donald L., “Emerging Fora for International Litigation (Part 1): Implications of the Proliferation of International Legal Fora: The Example of the Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases,” 43 Harv. Int'l L.J.541 (2002)Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans, Politics Among Nations (5th ed., 1973)

Morris, Hugh G., “The Continental Shelf – An International Dilemma,” 1 Osgoode Hall L. J.37 (1958)Google Scholar

Morris, Michael A., “The New International Economic Order and the New Law of the Sea,” in The New International Economic Order – Confrontation or Cooperation between North and South? (Karl P. Sauvant and Hajo Hasenpflug eds., 1977), p. 175–89

Morrison, Fred L., “The Future of International Adjudication,” 75 Minn. L. Rev.827 (1991)Google Scholar

Moss, Ronald Scott, “Insuring Unilaterally Licensed Deep Seabed Mining Operations Against Adverse Rulings by the International Court of Justice: An Assessment of the Risks,” 14 Ocean Dev. & Int'l L. J.161 (1984)Google Scholar

Munkman, A. L. W., “Adjudication and Adjustment – International Judicial Decision and the Settlement of Territorial and Boundary Disputes,” 46 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.1 (1972–73)Google Scholar

Murphy, C. F., “The World Court and the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes,” 7 Ga. J. Int. & Comp. L.551 (1977)Google Scholar

Nandan, Satya N., “Legislative and Executive Powers of the International Seabed Authority for the Implementation of the Law of the Sea Convention,” in Order for the Oceans at the Turn of the Century (Davor Vidas and Willy Østreng eds., 1999), p. 73

Ndiaye, Tafsir Malick, “Provisional Measures Before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” in Current Marine Environmental Issues and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Myron H. Nordquist and John Norton Moore eds., 2001), p. 95

Nelson, L. D. M., “The Roles of Equity in the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries,” 84 Am. J. Int'l L.837 (1990)Google Scholar

Nordquist, Myron H. et al. eds., United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary (1989)

Northedge, F. S., and Donelan, M. D., International Disputes: The Political Aspects (1971)

Noyes, John E., “Compulsory Third-Party Adjudication and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 4 Conn. J. Int'l L.675 (1989)Google Scholar

Noyes, John E., “The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea,” 32 Cornell Int'l L.J.109 (1999)Google Scholar

O'Connell, D. P., “The Geneva Conference on the Law of the Sea: Possible Implications for Australia,” 32 Australian L. J.134 (1958)Google Scholar

O'Connell, D. P., The Influence of Law on Sea Power (1975)

O'Connell, D. P., The International Law of the Sea (I. A. Shearer ed., 1984)

Oda, Shigeru, “The Territorial Sea and Natural Resources,” 4 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.415 (1955)Google Scholar

Oda, Shigeru, “A Reconsideration of the Continental Shelf Doctrine,” 32 Tul. L. Rev.21 (1957)Google Scholar

Oda, Shigeru, “Fisheries under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” 77 Am. J. Int'l L.739 (1983)Google Scholar

Oda, Shigeru, “Some Reflections on the Dispute Settlement Clauses in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,” in Essays in International Law in Honour of Judge Manfred Lachs (Jerzy Makarczyk ed., 1984), p. 645

Oda, Shigeru, “Dispute Settlement Prospects in the Law of the Sea,” 44 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.863 (1995)Google Scholar

Oellers-Frahm, Karin, “Interim Measures of Protection,” in 1 Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Rudolph Bernhardt ed., 1986), p. 70

Örebech, Peter, Sigurjonsson, Ketill, and McDorman, Ted L., “The 1995 United Nations Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks Agreement: Management, Enforcement and Dispute Settlement,” 13 Int'l J. Marine & Coastal L.119 (1998)Google Scholar

Orrego Vicuña, Francisco ed., The Exclusive Economic Zone: A Latin American Perspective (1984)

Orrego Vicuña, Francisco “The Contribution of the Exclusive Economic Zone to the Law of Maritime Delimitation,” 31 German Y.B. Int'l L.120 (1988)Google Scholar