Bibliography

Bryan van Norden

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511497995.009

Ahern, Dennis, M. “Is Mo Tzu a Utilitarian?” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 3 (1976): 185–93.Google Scholar

Allan, Sarah. The Way of Water and Sprouts of Virtue. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Ames, Roger. “The Mencian Conception of Ren Xing: Does It Mean Human Nature?” Pp. 143–75 in Henry Rosemont, ed., Chinese Texts and Philosophical Contexts: Essays Dedicated to Angus C. Graham. Chicago: Open Court Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Ames, Roger “Mencius and a Process Notion of Human Nature.” Pp. 72–90 in Chan, Mencius.

Angle, Stephen C. and Gordon, John A., “‘Dao’ as a Nickname.” Asian Philosophy 13:1 (Mar 2003): 15–27.CrossRef Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Pp. 351–64 in Cahn and Haber, Twentieth Century Ethical Theory.

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. 2d rev. ed. 1920. “http://newadvent.org/summa/” (2000).

Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Irwin, Terence. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1985.Google Scholar

Asad, Talal. “Anthropological Conceptions of Religion: Reflections on Geertz.” Man, n.s., 18 (1983): 237–59.CrossRef Google Scholar

Audi, Robert, ed. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. 2d ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Augustine. Confessions. Translated by Chadwick, Henry. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Augustine, On Free Choice of the Will. Translated by Thomas Williams. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1993.Google Scholar

Austin, J. 2. How to Do Things with Words. Edited by Urmson, J. O.. New York: Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Baier, Kurt. “Radical Virtue Ethics.” Pp. 126–35 in French, Uehling, and Wettstein, Ethical Theory.

Barth, Frederik. “On Responsibility and Humanity: Calling a Colleague to Account.” Current Anthropology 15:1 (1974): 100–2.CrossRef Google Scholar

Beattie, John H. M. “On Understanding Ritual.” Pp. 240–68 in Wilson, Rationality.

Beattie, John H. 2. “Ritual and Social Change.” Man, n.s. 1 (1966): 60–74.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bell, Catherine. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Benedict, Ruth. “Anthropology and the Abnormal.” Pp. 262–83 in Margaret Mead, ed., An Anthropologist at Work: Writings of Ruth Benedict. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1959.Google Scholar

Benedict, RuthPatterns of Culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1934.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. “Alleged Relativism in Eighteenth-Century European Thought.” Pp. 70–90 in Berlin, The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas. New York: Vintage Books, 1992.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Richard J.Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Bloch, Maurice. “From Cognition to Ideology.” Pp. 106–36 in Bloch, Ritual, History and Power.

Bloch, Maurice “The Disconnection between Power and Rank as a Process: An Outline of the Development of Kingdoms in Central Madagascar.” Pp. 46–88 in Block, Ritual, History and Power.

Bloch, MauriceRitual, History and Power: Selected Papers in Anthropology. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Athlone Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Bloch, Maurice “Symbols, Song, Dance and Features of Articulation: Is Religion an Extreme Form of Traditional Authority?” Pp. 18–45 in Bloch, Ritual, History and Power.

Brandt, Richard. “Some Merits of One Form of Rule-Utilitarianism.” Pp. 418–36 in Cahn and Haber, Twentieth Century Ethical Theory.

Bresciani, Umberto. Reinventing Confucianism: The New Confucian Movement. Taipei: Taipei Ricci Institute, 2001.Google Scholar

Brooks, E. Bruce and Brooks, A. Taeko, The Original Analects: Sayings of Confucius and His Successors. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Brooks, E. Bruce and Brooks, A. TaekoResponse to the review by Edward Slingerland. Philosophy East and West 50:1 (January 2000): 141–46.Google Scholar

Brooks, E. Bruce and A. Taeko Brooks “Word Philology and Text Philology in Analects 9.1.” Pp. 163–215 in Van Norden, Confucius and the Analects.

Brown, Donald E.Human Universals. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.Google Scholar

Brown, Peter. Augustine of Hippo: A Biography. Rev. ed., Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. 2. “Aristotle on Learning to Be Good.” Pp. 69–92 in Rorty, Essays on Aristotle's Ethics.

Butler, Joseph. Five Sermons Preached at the Rolls Chapel. Edited by Stephen L. Darwall. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1983.Google Scholar

Cahn, Steven M., Patricia Kitcher, and George Sher. “The Elements of Argument.” Pp. 1–19 in idem, eds., Reason at Work: Introductory Readings in Philosophy. 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich, 1990.Google Scholar

Cahn, Steven M. and Haber, Joram G., Twentieth Century Ethical Theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995.Google Scholar

Campany, Robert F. “Xunzi and Durkheim as Theorists of Ritual Practice.” Pp. 197–231 in Frank Reynolds and David Tracy, eds., Discourse and Practice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Campbell, Richmond. “A Short Refutation of Ethical Egoism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2:2 (December 1972): 249–54.CrossRef Google Scholar

Xueqin, Cao and Gao, E. The Story of the Stone: Also Known as the Dream of the Red Chamber. Vol. 4. Translated by John Minford. New York: Penguin Books, 1982.Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolph. “The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language.” Pp. 60–81 in A. J. Ayer, ed., Logical Positivism. New York: The Free Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Chan, Alan K. 2., ed. Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Chan, Sin Yee. “Can shu Be the One Word that Serves as the Guiding Principle of Caring Actions?” Philosophy East and West 50:4 (October 2000): 507–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chan, Wing-tsit, trans. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Chang, Carson, Hsieh Yu-wei, Hsu Foo-kwan, Mou Chung-san, , and Chun-i, Tang [sic], “A Manifesto on the Reappraisal of Chinese Culture.” Pp. 492–562 in T'ang Chun-i, Essays on Chinese Philosophy and Culture. Taipei: Student Book Company, 1988.Google Scholar

Chéng Yuánmǐn 元敏, “‘Lǐjì Zhōngyōng, Fāngjì, Zīyī’ fēi chū yú ‘Zǐ Sīzǐ’ kǎo.” “ 禮 : 中庸, 紀, 衣非出於子思子考.” Pp. 1–47 in Zhang Yiren xiansheng qizhi shouqing lunwen ji, vol. 1.

Chong, Kim Chong. “Mengzi and Gaozi on Nei and Wai.” Pp. 103–25 in Chan, Mencius.

Church, Jennifer. “Morality and the Internalized Other.” Pp. 209–23 in Jerome Neu, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Freud. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Cicero, Marcus Tullius. “The Dream of Scipio,” Pp. 337–55 in Cicero, On the Good Life. Translated by Michael Grant. New York: Penguin Books, 1971.Google Scholar

Copp, David and Sobel, David. “Morality and Virtue: An Assessment of Some Recent Work in Virtue Ethics.” Ethics 114 (April 2004): 514–54.CrossRef Google Scholar

Creel, Herrlee G.Confucius and the Chinese Way (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1960; o.p. Confucius: The Man and the Myth, 1949).Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, Mark. “Confucius and the Analects in the Han.” Pp. 134–62 in Van Norden, Confucius and the Analects.

Csikszentmihalyi, Mark and Ivanhoe, P. J., eds. Essays on Religious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Cuī Shù 崔述. Zhusì kǎoxìn lù 洙泗信錄. Published 1810.

Zhèn, Dài 戴震. Mèngzǐ zìyì shūshèng 孟子字疏證, in Hu, Dai Dongyuan de zhexue.

Dancy, Jonathan. “Ethical Particularism and Morally Relevant Properties.” Mind 92 (1983): 530–47.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dancy, JonathanMoral Reasons. New York: Blackwell, 1993.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. The Descent of Man, 2nd ed. Reprint, New York: Prometheus Books, 1998.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald “Radical Interpretation.” Pp. 125–39 in Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation.

Davidson, Donald “Truth and Meaning.” Pp. 17–36 in Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation.

Davidson, Donald “What Metaphors Mean.” Pp. 245–64 in Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation.

Sousa, Ronald. The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Defoort, Carine. “Is There Such a Thing as Chinese Philosophy? Arguments of an Implicit Debate.” Philosophy East and West 51:3 (July 2001): 393–413.CrossRef Google Scholar

Deigh, John. “Shame and Self-Esteem: A Critique.” Pp. 133–53 in Deigh, ed., Ethics and Personality: Essays in Moral Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. Limited Inc. Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Descartes, Rene. Selected Philosophical Writings. Translated by John Cottingham et al. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dobson, W. 2. C. 2., trans. Mencius: A New Translation Arranged and Annotated for the General Reader. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1963.CrossRef Google Scholar

Donnellan, Keith S. “Reference and Definite Descriptions.” The Philosophical Review 75:3 (July 1966): 281–304.CrossRef Google Scholar

Duda, Kristopher. “Reconsidering Mo Tzu on the Foundations of Morality.” Asian Philosophy 11:1 (2001): 23–31.CrossRef Google Scholar

Duhem, Pierre. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Translated by Philip P. Wiener. Reprint, New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Dumoulin, Heinrich. Zen Buddhism: A History. 2 vols. Reprint, New York: Macmillan, 1994.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by Karen E. Fields. New York: The Free Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Ekman, Paul. Emotions Revealed: Recognizing Faces and Feelings to Improve Communication and Emotional Life. New York: Henry Hold and Company, 2003.Google Scholar

Emerson, John J. “Yang Chu's Discovery of the Body.” Philosophy East and West 46:4 (October 1996): 533–66.CrossRef Google Scholar

Eno, Robert. The Confucian Creation of Heaven. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Eno, Robert “Cook Ding's Dao and the Limits of Philosophy.” Pp. 127–51 in Paul Kjellberg and Philip J. Ivanhoe, eds., Essays on Skepticism, Relativism and Ethics in the Zhuangzi. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Fàn Xiángyōng 范雍 Gǔběn zhúshū jìnián dìngbǔ 本書記年輯校訂補. China, Shanghai: 1962.

Faure, Bernard. Chan Insights and Oversights: An Epistemological Critique of the Chan Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Youlan, Feng, The Hall of Three Pines: An Account of My Life. Translated by Denis C. Mair. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Fingarette, Herbert. Confucius: The Secular as Sacred. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1972.Google Scholar

Fingarette, Herbert “Following the ‘One Thread’ of the Analects.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion Thematic Issue S (September 1980): 373–405.Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry and LePore, Earnest. Holism: A Shopper's Guide. New York: Blackwell Publishing, 1992.Google Scholar

Frankena, William. Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.Google Scholar

Frazer, Sir James. The Golden Bough. Published 1890.

Freeman, Derek. Margaret Mead and Samoa: The Making and Unmaking of a Myth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

French, Peter A., Uehling, Jr., Theodore E., and Wettstein, Howard K., eds. Ethical Theory: Character and Virtue. Vol. 13 of Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Friedländer, Paul. Plato: An Introduction. Translated by Hans Meyerhoff. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Fung Yu-lan, . A History of Chinese Philosophy, 2 vols. Translated by Derk Bodde. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1952. (See also under “Feng Youlan.”)Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. 2nd rev. ed. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. New York: Continuum Publishing, 1994.Google Scholar

Gardner, Daniel K.Chu Hsi and the Ta-hsüeh: Neo-Confucian Reflection on the Confucian Canon. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gardner, Daniel K. trans. Learning to Be a Sage: Selections from the Conversations of Master Chu, Arranged Topically. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Gardner, Daniel K.Zhu Xi's Reading of the Analects: Canon, Commentary, and the Classical Tradition. New York: Columbia University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Gautier, David P., ed. Morality and Rational Self-Interest. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970.Google Scholar

Geaney, Jane M. “A Critique of A. C. Graham's Reconstruction of the ‘Neo-Mohist Canons.’” Journal of the American Oriental Society 119:1 (1999): 1–11.CrossRef Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford “Religion as a Cultural System.” Pp. 87–125 in Geertz, Interpretation of Cultures.

Geertz, Clifford “Ritual and Social Change: A Javanese Example.” Pp. 142–69 in Geertz, Interpretation of Cultures.

Geertz, Clifford “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” Pp. 3–30 in Geertz, Interpretation of Cultures.

Gellner, Ernest. “Concepts and Society.” Pp. 18–49 in Wilson, Rationality.

Gewirth, Alan. “The ‘Is/Ought’ Problem Resolved.” Proceedings and Addresses of the APA 47 (1973–74): 34–61. Reprinted in pp. 500–18, Cahn and Haber, eds., Twentieth Century Ethical Theory.Google Scholar

Giles, Lionel. The Book of Mencius. 1942. Reprint, Rutland, VT: Charles E. Tuttle Company, 1993.Google Scholar

Goldin, Paul Rakita. “A Mind-Body Problem in the Zhuangzi?” Pp. 226–47 in Scott Cook, ed. Hiding the World in the World: Uneven Discourses on the Zhuangzi. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Goldin, Paul Rakita “The Old Chinese Particles yan 焉 and an 安.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 123.1 (2003): 169–73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goldin, Paul Rakita “The Reception of the Odes in the Warring States Era.” Pp. 19–35 in Goldin, After Confucius: Studies in Early Chinese Philosophy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2005.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goldin, Paul RakitaRituals of the Way: The Philosophy of Xunzi. Chicago: Open Court Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Goldin, Paul Rakita “When zhong Does Not Mean ‘Loyalty.’” Unpublished manuscript, 2006.

Goldin, Paul Rakita “Xunzi in the Light of the Guodian Manuscripts.” Pp. 36–57 in Goldin, After Confucius: Studies in Early Chinese Philosophy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2005. (Originally published in Early China 25 [2000]: 113–46.)CrossRef Google Scholar

Goody, Jack. “Against ‘Ritual’: Loosely Structured Thoughts on a Loosely Defined Topic.” Pp. 25–35 in Sally F. Moore and Barbara G. Myerhoff, eds., Secular Ritual. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum, 1977.Google Scholar

Graham, Angus C. “The Background of the Mencian Theory of Human Nature.” Pp. 7–66 in Graham, Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature.

Graham, Angus C. trans. The Book of Lieh-tzu: A Classic of the Tao. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Graham, Angus C. trans. Chuang-tzu: The Inner Chapters. 1981. Reprint, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2001.Google Scholar

Graham, Angus C.Disputers of the Tao. Chicago: Open Court Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Graham, Angus C.Divisions in Early Mohism Reflected in the Core Chapters of Mo-tzu. Singapore: Institute of East Asian Philosophies, 1985.Google Scholar

Graham, Angus C. “A First Reading of the ‘White Horse.’” Pp. 167–92 in Graham, Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature.

Graham, Angus C. Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, 1978.

Graham, Angus C. “Reflections and Replies.” Pp. 267–322 in Henry Rosemont, ed., Chinese Texts and Philosophical Contexts: Essays Dedicated to Angus C. Graham. La Salle, IL: Open Court Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Graham, Angus C. Review of The World of Thought in Ancient China, by Benjamin Schwartz. TLS (Times Literary Supplement) no. 4346 (July 18, 1986): 795.

Graham, Angus C.Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature. Reprint, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Graham, Angus C.Two Chinese Philosophers. 1958. Reprint, Chicago: Open Court Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Grandy, Richard E. “Reference, Meaning, and Belief.” The Journal of Philosophy 70:14 (August 16, 1973): 439–52.CrossRef Google Scholar

Greenspan, Patricia. “Guilt and Virtue.” The Journal of Philosophy 91:2 (February 1994): 57–70.CrossRef Google Scholar

Grinker, Richard. In the Arms of Africa: The Life of Colin Turnbull. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Guōdiàn Chǔmù zhújiǎn 郭店楚竹. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe, 1998.

Hall, David L. and Ames, Roger T.. Anticipating China. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Hall, David L. and Ames, Roger T.Thinking from the Han. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Hall, David L. and Ames, Roger T.Thinking through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Hampshire, Stuart. “Two Theories of Morality.” Pp. 10–68 in Hampshire, Morality and Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Hansen, Chad. A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Harbsmeier, Christoph. Language and Logic. Vol. 7 of Joseph Needham, ed., Science and Civilisation in China. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Harbsmeier, Christoph “Marginalia Sino-Logica.” Pp. 125–66 in Robert Allinson, ed. Understanding the Chinese Mind: The Philosophical Roots. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Harvey,, A. The Historian and the Believer. Reprint, Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Hatton, Russell, “Chinese Philosophy or ‘Philosophy’?” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 14:4 (December 1987): 445–73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hé Yàn 何晏, Lúnyǔ jíjiè 論語集解.

Henderson, John B.Scripture, Canon and Commentary: A Comparison of Confucian and Western Exegesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.CrossRef Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter. “Kant's Notion of a Deduction and the Methodological Background of the First Critique.” Pp. 29–46 in Eckart Förster, ed., Kant's Transcendental Deductions. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Herodotus, . The History. Translated by David Grene. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hesiod, , Theogony. Pp. 119–86 in Richmond Lattimore, trans., Hesiod. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Hesse, Mary. “Duhem, Quine and a New Empiricism.” Pp. 208–28 in Morick, Challenges to Empiricism.

Hinton, David, trans. Mencius. Washington: Counterpoint, 1998.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, or the Matter, Form and Power of a Commonwealth, Ecclesiastical and Civil. 1651.

Hoff, Benjamin. The Tao of Pooh. Reprint, New York: Viking Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Hooper, Judith. Of Moths and Men: An Evolutionary Tale: The Untold Story of Science and the Peppered Moth. Reprint. W.W. Norton and Company, 2003.Google Scholar

Hsiao, Kung-chuan. A History of Chinese Political Thought. Vol. 1: From the Beginnings to the Sixth Century A.D. Translated by F. W. Mote. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Hú Shì 適, ed. Dài Dōngyuán de zhéxué 戴東的學. (適作品集 32) 臺灣: 遠流出版事業, 1986.

Shì, HúThe Development of the Logical Method in Ancient China, 2nd ed. New York: Paragon Book Reprint Corp., 1963.Google Scholar

Hú Shì Zhōngguó zhéxué shǐ dàgāng 中哲學大. Reprint. 京: 東方出版, 1996.

Hume, David. “A Dialogue.” Pp. 107–19 in Hume, An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Hume, David “The Sceptic.” Pp. 159-80 in Hume, Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, rev. ed. Edited by Eugene F. Miller. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1985.Google Scholar

Hursthouse, Rosalind. On Virtue Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Hutton, Eric. “Does Xunzi Have a Consistent Theory of Human Nature?” Pp. 220–36 in Kline and Ivanhoe, Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi.

Hutton, Eric “Moral Connoisseurship in Mengzi.” Pp. 163–86 in Liu and Ivanhoe, Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi.

HY: Refers to the relevant volume of the Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series.

Isenberg, Arnold. “Natural Pride and Natural Shame.” 1949. Reprint, pp. 355–83 in A. O. Rorty, ed., Explaining Emotions. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Ivanhoe, Philip J., ed. Chinese Language, Thought and Culture: Nivison and His Criticis. Chicago: Open Court Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Ivanhoe, Philip J.Confucian Moral Self Cultivation, rev. ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2000.Google Scholar

Ivanhoe, Philip J. “Confucian Self Cultivation and Mengzi's Notion of Extension.” Pp. 221–41 in Liu and Ivanhoe, eds., Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi.

Ivanhoe, Philip J.Ethics in the Confucian Tradition: The Thought of Mencius and Wang Yang-ming. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Ivanhoe, Philip J. “The Golden Rule in the Analects.” In David Jones, Confucius Now: Contemporary Encounters with the Analects. Chicago: Open Court Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar

Ivanhoe, Philip J. “Mohist Philosophy,” Pp. 451–58 in the International Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York: Routledge Press, 1998), vol. 6.Google Scholar

Ivanhoe, Philip J. “A Question of Faith: A New Interpretation of Mencius 2B.13,” Early China 13 (1988): 153–65.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ivanhoe, Philip J. “Reweaving the ‘One Thread’ of the Analects,” Philosophy East and West 40:1 (January 1990): 17–33.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ivanhoe, Philip J. “Whose Confucius? Which Analects? Diversity in the Confucian Commentarial Tradition.” Pp. 119–33 in Van Norden, Confucius and the Analects.

Ivanhoe, Philip J. and Norden, Bryan W., eds. Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy. 2nd rev. ed, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2005.Google Scholar

Jenner, Donald. “Mo Tzu and Hobbes: Preliminary Remarks on the Relation of Chinese & Western Politics.” Cogito 2 (1984): 49–72.Google Scholar

Jensen, Lionel M.Manufacturing Confucianism. Durham: Duke University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Jochim, Chrisian. “Ethical Analysis of an Ancient Debate: Moists versus Confucians.” Journal of Religious Ethics 8:1 (1980): 135–47.Google Scholar

Johnston, Ian. “Choosing the Greater and Choosing the Lesser: A Translation and Analysis of the Daqu and Xiaoqu Chapters of the Mozi.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 27:4 (2000): 375–407.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles H.Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans: A Brief History. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2001.Google Scholar

Kalin, Jesse. “Two Kinds of Moral Reasoning: Ethical Egoism as a Moral Theory.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5:3 (November 1975): 323–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kalin, Jesse “In Defense of Egoism.” Pp. 64–87 in Gautier, Morality and Rational Self-Interest.

Kant, Immanuel. Doctrine of Virtue. 1797. Pp. 139–234 in Kant, The Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Gregor, Mary J.. 2nd rev. ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel Groundwork to the Metaphysics of Morals. 1785.

Kaplan, David. “Opacity.” Pp. 229–89 in Lewis Hahn and Paul Schilpp, eds., The Philosophy of W.V. Quine. Chicago: Open Court Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Katz, Leonard D., ed. Evolutionary Origins of Morality: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. Bowling Green, OH: Imprint Academic, 2000.Google Scholar

Kekes, John. “Shame and Moral Progress.” Pp. 282–96 in French et al., Ethical Theory.

Kelly, John D. and Kaplan, Martha, “History, Structure, and Ritual.” Annual Review of Anthropology 1990 (19): 119–50.

King, Martin Luther. “Letter from Birmingham City Jail.” Pp. 289–302 in King, A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings and Speeches of Martin Luther King, Jr. Edited by James Melvin Washington. New York: Harper-Collins, 1991.Google Scholar

Kirk, G. 2., Raven, J. 2., and Schofield, M.. The Presocratic Philosophers, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Kline, Thornton Charles and Ivanhoe, Philip J., eds. Virtue, Nature and Agency in the Xunzi. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2000.Google Scholar

Knoblock, John, trans. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works, 3 vols. Stanford University Press, 1988–1994.Google Scholar

Knoblock, John and Riegel, Jeffrey. The Annals of Lü Buwei: A Complete Translation and Study. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine. “From Duty and for the Sake of the Noble: Kant and Aristotle on Morally Good Action.” Pp. 203–36 in S. Engstrom and J. Whiting, eds. Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul. Naming and Necessity. Reprint, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kupperman, Joel J. “Falsity, Psychic Indefiniteness, and Self-Knowledge.” Pp. 66–78 in Kupperman, Learning from Asian Philosophy.

Kupperman, Joel J.Learning from Asian Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Kupperman, Joel J. “Naturalness Revisited: Why Western Philosophers Should Study Confucius.” Pp. 39–52 in Van Norden, Confucius and the Analects.

Kurtines, William M. and Gewirtz, Jacob L., eds. Moral Development: An Introduction. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 1995.Google Scholar

Lai, Whalen. “The Public Good that Does the Public Good: A New Reading of Mohism.” Asian Philosophy 3:2 (1993): 125–41.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books, 1999.

Lau, D. 2., trans. Confucius: The Analects. New York: Penguin Books, 1979.Google Scholar

Lau, D. 2. trans. Mencius. New York: Penguin Books, 1970.Google Scholar

Lee, Pauline C. “Li Zhi and John Stuart Mill: A Confucian Feminist Critique of Liberal Feminism.” Pp. 113–32 in Li, The Sage and the Second Sex.

Legge, James, trans. The Chinese Classics. 1895. Reprint, Taipei: SMC Publishing, 1991.Google Scholar

Legge, James trans. The Ch'un Ts'ew with the Tso Chuen. Vol. 5 of Legge, The Chinese Classics.

Legge, James trans. Confucian Analects, Great Learning, and Doctrine of the Mean. 1895. Reprint, New York: Dover Books, 1971.Google Scholar

Legge, James trans. The She King, or The Book of Poetry. Vol. 4 of Legge, The Chinese Classics.

Legge, James trans. The Shoo King, or The Book of Historical Documents. Vol. 3 of Legge, The Chinese Classics.

Legge, James trans. The Works of Mencius. 1895. Reprint, New York: Dover Books, 1970.Google Scholar

Lewis, Mark Edward. Sanctioned Violence in Early China. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Li, Chenyang. “Jen and the Feminist Ethics of Care.” Pp. 23–42 in Li, The Sage and the Second Sex.

Li, ChenyangThe Sage and the Second Sex: Confucianism, Ethics, and Gender. Chicago: Open Court Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Lǐ Xīxìng 李西興. “Guǎnyú Zhōu Xuānwáng zhī sǐ de kǎochá 關於宣王之死的察.” Pp. 966–76 in Xi Zhou shi lunwenji, vol. 2. Xi'an: Shaanxi Renmin jiaoyu, 1983.

Lǐ Zhì 李贄. Fén shū 焚書.

Liu, JeeLoo. An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy: From Ancient Philosophy to Chinese Buddhism. New York: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar

Liu, Shu-hsien. Understanding Confucian Philosophy. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998.Google Scholar

Liu, Xiusheng and Ivanhoe, Philip J., eds. Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2002.Google Scholar

Liu, Yuli. The Unity of Rule and Virtue. New York: Eastern University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Loewe, Michael and , Edward Shaughnessy, eds. The Cambridge History of Ancient China: From the Origins of Civilization to 221 B.C. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRef Google Scholar

Louden, Robert B. “Kant's Virtue Ethics.” Pp. 286–99 in Daniel Statman, ed. Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Louden, Robert B. “‘What Does Heaven Say?’ Christian Wolff and Western Interpretations of Confucian Ethics.” Pp. 73–93 in Van Norden, Confucius and the Analects.

Lowe, Scott. Mo Tzu's Religious Blueprint for a Chinese Utopia. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Loy, Hui Chieh. “On Correcting Names: Language and Politics in the Analects.” Master's thesis, National University of Singapore, 1999.

Lykken, David T.The Antisocial Personalities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995.Google Scholar

Lyotard, Jean-François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Pp. 481–513 in Lawrence Cahoone, ed., From Modernism to Postmodernism: An Anthology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue, 2nd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair “Incommensurability, Truth, and the Conversation between Confucians and Aristotelians about the Virtues.” Pp. 104–22 in Eliot Deutsch, ed. Culture and Modernity: East-West Philosophic Perspectives. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1991.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair “Once More on Confucian and Aristotelian Conceptions of the Virtues: A Response to Professor Wan.” Pp. 151–62 in Wang, Chinese Philosophy in an Era of Globalization.

MacIntyre, AlasdairWhose Justice? Which Rationality?Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Mackie, J. 2.Hume's Moral Theory. Reprint, New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

Major, John. Heaven and Earth in Early Han Thought: Chapters Three, Four and Five of the Huainanzi. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Makeham, John. “The Formation of Lunyu as a Book,” Monumenta Serica 44 (1996): 1–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Makeham, JohnName and Actuality in Early Chinese Thought. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Makeham, JohnNew Confucianism: A Critical Examination. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.CrossRef Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronislaw. Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays. Long Grove: Waveland Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Malotki, Ekkehart. Hopi Time. Berlin: Mouton, 1983.CrossRef Google Scholar

Martin, Laura. “‘Eskimo Words for Snow’: A Case Study in the Genesis and Decay of an Anthropological Example.” American Anthropologist 88 (1986): 418–23.CrossRef Google Scholar

McCarthy, Michael H.The Crisis of Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.Google Scholar

McNaughton, David. Moral Vision: An Introduction to Ethics. New York: Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar

Mead, Margaret. Coming of Age in Samoa. New York: Morrow, 1928.Google Scholar

Medlin, Brian. “Ultimate Principles and Ethical Egoism.” Pp. 56–63 in Gautier, ed., Morality and Rational Self-Interest. Reprint, pp. 316–21 in Cahn and Haber, Twentieth Century Ethical Theory.

Mei, Yi-pao. The Ethical and Political Works of Motse. Reprint, Westport, CT: Hyperion Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Metzger, Thomas. Escape from Predicament: Neo-Confucianism and China's Evolving Political Culture. New York: Columbia University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Midgley, Mary. Heart and Mind: The Varieties of Moral Experience. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Miller, Mitchell H. Jr. “‘First of All’: On the Semantics and Ethics of Hesiod's Cosmogony.” Ancient Philosophy 21:2 (Fall 2001): 251–76.CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, Mitchell H. Jr. “The Implicit Logic of Hesiod's Cosmogony: An Examination of Theogony, 116–133.” Independent Journal of Philosophy 4 (1983): 131–42.Google Scholar

Mitford, Jessica. The American Way of Death Revisited. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1998.Google Scholar

Molière, Jean Baptiste. The Hypochondriac. Translated by A. R. Waller. In The Plays of Molière, vol. 8. Edinburgh: John Grant, 1907.Google Scholar

Moore, G. 2.Principia Ethica. 1903. Reprint, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Morick, Harold, ed. Challenges to Empiricism. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1980.Google Scholar

Morohashi Tetsuji 諸橋轍次. Daikanwajiten 漢辭典. Rev ed., Tokyo: Taishukan shoten, 1984.

Morris, Desmond. Catwatching. New York: Crown Publishers, 1986.Google Scholar

Mou, Bo. “A Reexamination of the Structure and Content of Confucius' Version of the Golden Rule.” Philosophy East and West 54:2 (April 2004): 218–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Munro, Donald. The Concept of Man in Early China. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Munro, Donald “The Origin of the Concept of Te.” Appendix, pp. 185–97, in Munro, The Concept of Man in Early China.

Munro, Donald “A Villain in the Xunzi.” Pp. 193–201 in Ivanhoe, Chinese Language, Thought and Culture.

Murdoch, Iris. “The Sovereignty of Good over Other Concepts.” Pp. 77–104 in Murdoch, The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970.Google Scholar

Mythbusters. Episode 39: Chinese Invasion Alarm. First broadcast 19 October 2005 by The Learning Channel.

Nagel, Thomas. “Aristotle on Eudaimonia.” Pp. 7–14 in Rorty, Essays on Aristotle's Ethics.

Nagel, ThomasThe View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Narayan, Uma. “Essence of Culture and a Sense of History: A Feminist Critique of Cultural Essentialism.” Pp. 80–100 in Uma Naryan and Sandra Harding, eds., Decentering the Center. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Needham, Joseph. Science and Civilisation in China. Vol. 3, Mathematics and the Sciences of the Heavens and the Earth. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Neville, Robert. Boston Confucianism: Portable Tradition in the Late-Modern World. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Nhat Hanh, Thich. The Heart of Understanding: Commentaries on the Prajnaparamita Heart Sutra. Parallax Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Nivison, David S. “Can Virtue Be Self-Taught?” Pp. 45–57 in Nivison, Ways of Confucianism, pp. 45–57.

Nivison, David S. “Golden Rule Arguments in Chinese Moral Philosophy.” Pp. 59–76 in Nivison, Ways of Confucianism.

Nivison, David S. “Mencius and Motivation.” Thematic Issue S of the Journal of the American Academy of Religion (September 1980): 417–32.

Nivison, David S. “Mengzi as Philosopher of History.” Pp. 282–304 in Chan, Mencius.

Nivison, David S. “Motivation and Moral Action in Mencius.” Pp. 91–119 in Nivison, Ways of Confucianism.

Nivison, David S. “The Paradox of ‘Virtue.’” Pp. 31–43 in Nivison, Ways of Confucianism.

Nivison, David S. “Philosophical Voluntarism in Fourth-Century China.” Pp. 121–32 in Nivison, Ways of Confucianism.

Nivison, David S. “The Philosophy of Wang Yangming.” Pp. 217–31 in Nivison, Ways of Confucianism.

Nivison, David S. “Problems in the Mengzi: 6A3–5.” Pp. 149–66 in Nivison, Ways of Confucianism.

Nivison, David S. “‘Virtue’ in Bone and Bronze.” Pp. 17–30 in Nivison, Ways of Confucianism.

Nivison, David S. The Ways of Confucianism. Edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. Chicago: Open Court Press, 1996.

Nivison, David S. “Weakness of Will in Ancient Chinese Philosophy.” Pp. 79–90 in Nivison, Ways of Confucianism.

Nivison, David S. “Xunzi on ‘Human Nature.’” Pp. 203–13 in Nivison, Ways of Confucianism.

Nussbaum, Martha. “The Discernment of Perception: An Aristotelian Conception of Private and Public Rationality.” Pp. 54–105 in Nussbaum, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha “Non-Relative Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach.” Pp. 32–53 in French at al., Ethical Theory.

Nussbaum, Martha “Shame, Separateness, and Political Unity: Aristotle's Criticism of Plato.” Pp. 395–435 in Rorty, Essays on Aristotle's Ethics.

O'Neill, Onora. “Kant after Virtue.” Pp. 145–62 in O'Neill, Constructions of Reason. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Oltmanns, Thomas F., Neale, John M., and Davison, Gerald C.. Case Studies in Abnormal Psychology, 5th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1999.Google Scholar

Parfit, Derek. Reasons and Persons. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. “Fallibilism, Continuity, and Evolution.” Ca. 1897. In Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, eds., The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 5, para. 388–410. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1934.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders “How to Make Our Ideas Clear.” 1878. In Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, eds. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 1, para. 141–75. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1933.

Pelikan, Jaroslav. The Vindication of Tradition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Pickering, Andrew. Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Reprint, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Pines, Yuri. Foundations of Confucian Thought: Intellectual Life in the Chunqiu Period, 722–453 B.C.E. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Plaks, Andrew. Archetype and Allegory in “Dream of the Red Chamber.” Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Plato, , Meno. Pp. 57–88 in Plato, Five Dialogues. Translated by G. M. A. Grube. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1981.Google Scholar

Porter, Jean. The Recovery of Virtue: The Relevance of Aquinas for Christian Ethics. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Prichard, H. A. “Does Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?” 1912. Reprint, pp. 37–47 in Cahn and Haber, Twentieth Century Ethical Theory.

Pulleyblank, Edwin G.Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar. Vancouver: UBC Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. Reason, Truth and History. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRef Google Scholar

Qián Mù 錢, Xiānqín zhūzǐ xìnián 先諸子年. 1956. Reprint, Taibei: Dongda tushu gongsi, 1990.

Quine, Willard van Orman. “Epistemology Naturalized.” Pp. 69–90 in Quine, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Quine, Willard van Orman “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” Pp. 20–46 in Quine, From a Logical Point of View. Second ed., rev. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Quine, Willard van OrmanWord & Object. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Quinn, Philip. “Divine Command Theory.” Pp. 53–73 in Hugh LaFollette, ed. Guide to Ethical Theory. New York: Blackwell Publishing, 1999.Google Scholar

Rachels, James. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. New York: Random House, 1986.Google Scholar

Radcliffe-Brown, A. 2. “Religion and Society.” Pp. 153–77 in Radcliffe-Brown, Structure and Function in Primitive Society: Essays and Addresses. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1952.Google Scholar

Raphals, Lisa. Sharing the Light: Representations of Women and Virtue in Early China. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Raphals, Lisa “A Woman Who Understood the Rites.” Pp. 275–302 in Van Norden, Confucius and the Analects.

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Rev. ed., Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Rawls, John “Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics.” Pp. 1–19 in Rawls, Collected Papers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Reprinted in pp. 212–24 of Cahn and Haber, eds., Twentieth Century Ethical Theory.

Readings, see Ivanhoe and Van Norden, Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy.

Rickett, W. Allyn. Guanzi: Political, Economic, and Philosophical Essays from Early China. Vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Ricouer, Paul. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Ridley, Matt. The Origins of Virtue: Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Penguin Books, 1996.Google Scholar

Roetz, Heiner. Confucian Ethics of the Axial Age: A Reconstruction under the Aspect of the Breakthrough toward Postconventional Thinking. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Rorty, Amélie Oksenberg, ed. Essays on Aristotle's Ethics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Rosemont, Henry. “Against Relativism.” Pp. 36–70 in Interpreting Across Boundaries, edited by Gerald James Larson and Eliot Deutsch. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Rosemont, HenryA Chinese Mirror: Moral Reflections on Political Economy and Society. Chicago: Open Court Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Ross, W. 2.The Right and the Good. 1930. Reprint, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1988.Google Scholar

Roth, Harold. Original Tao: Inward Training and the Foundations of Taoist Mysticism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Roth, Harold “Some Methodological Issues in the Study of the Guodian Laozi Parallels.” Pp. 71–88, in Sarah Allan and Crispin Williams, eds. The Guodian Laozi: Proceedings of the International Conference, Dartmouth College, May 1998. Berkeley: Society for the Study of Early China, 2000.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 1912. The Problems of Philosophy. Reprint, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1988.Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert. Collected Papers. Vol. 2. London: Hutchinson and Company, 1971.Google Scholar

Ryle, GilbertThe Concept of Mind. 1949. Reprint, New York: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert “Thinking and Reflecting.” Pp. 465–79 in Ryle, Collected Papers.

Ryle, Gilbert “The Thinking of Thoughts: What Is ‘Le Penseur’ Doing?” Pp. 480–96 in Ryle, Collected Papers.

Sartre, Jean-Paul. The Emotions: Outline of a Theory. 1948. Reprint, pp. 187–254 in Sartre, Essays in Existentialism. Edited by Wade Baskin. New York: Citadel Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Sartre, Jean-Paul “The Humanism of Existentialism.” 1947. Reprint, pp. 31–62 in Sartre, Essays in Existentialism. Edited by Wade Baskin. New York: Citadel Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand. Course in General Linguistics. Translated by Roy Harris. Chicago: Open Court Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Saussy, Haun. The Problem of a Chinese Aesthetic. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Schaberg, David. A Patterned Past: Form and Thought in Early Chinese Historiography. Cambridge: Harvard East Asian Monographs, 2001.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schwartz, Benjamin. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Schofer, Jonathan W. “Virtues in Xunzi's Thought.” Pp. 69–88 in Kline and Ivanhoe, Virtue, Nature and Agency in the Xunzi.

Schwitzgebel, Eric. “Human Nature and Moral Development in Mencius, Xunzi, Hobbes, and Rousseau.” Forthcoming in History of Philosophy Quarterly.

Searle, John. “How to Derive ‘Ought’ from ‘Is.’” Pp. 408–17 in Cahn and Haber, eds., Twentieth Century Ethical Theory.

Sellars, Wilfrid. “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind.” 1956. Reprint, pp. 205–76 in Willem A deVries and Timm Triplett, Knowledge, Mind, and the Given. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2000.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Riverside edition. Edited by G. Blakemore Evans. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1974.Google Scholar

Shun, Kwong-loi. Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Shun, Kwong-loi “Moral Reasons in Confucian Ethics.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 16.3–4 (1989): 317–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shun, Kwong-loi “Ren and Li in the Analects.” Pp. 53–72 in Van Norden, Confucius and the Analects.

Shun, Kwong-loiReview of The Confucian Creation of Heaven, by Robert Eno. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 52:2 (December 1992): 739–56.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shun, Kwong-loi “Virtue, Mind and Morality: A Study in Mencian Ethics.” Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1986.

Sidgwick, Henry. The Methods of Ethics. 1907. 7th ed. Reprint, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1981.Google Scholar

The Sixty-first Performance of the Shikinen Senguu in Ise. Produced by Jinguu Shichoo (the Administration of Ise Jinguu). 58 min. TVC Yamamoto, 1995. Videocassette.

Slingerland, Edward. Confucius: Analects: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar

Slingerland, EdwardEffortless Action: Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Slingerland, Edward “Why Philosophy Is Not ‘Extra’ in Understanding the Analects.” Review of The Original Analects, by E. Bruce and A. Taeko Brooks. Philosophy East and West 50:1 (January 2000): 137–41, 146–47.Google Scholar

Slote, Michael. Morals from Motives. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, Bernard. Utilitarianism: For and Against. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1973.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, Kidder, Jr., Bol, Peter K., Adler, Joseph A., and Wyatt, Don J.. Sung Dynasty Uses of the I Ching. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, William Robertson. Lectures on the Religion of the Semites: The Fundamental Problems. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan, 1927.Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott and Wilson, David Sloan. Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Sokal, Alan and Bricmont, Jean. Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science. New York: Picador, 1999.Google Scholar

Soles, David E. “Mo Tzu and the Foundations of Morality.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 26:1 (March 1999): 37–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Solomon, Robert C.The Passions: Emotions and the Meaning of Life. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1993. (Revised edition of The Passions: The Myth and Nature of Human Emotions [1976].)Google Scholar

Solomon, Robert C. “‘What Is Philosophy?’ The Status of World Philosophy in the Profession.” Philosophy East and West 51:1 (January 2001): 100–4.CrossRef Google Scholar

Spiro, Melford. Oedipus in the Trobriands. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Aaron. Overcoming Our Evil: Human Nature and Spiritual Exercises in Xunzi and Augustine. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Staub, Ervin. “The Roots of Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Persons and Groups: Environmental Influence, Personality, Culture, and Socialization.” Pp. 431–53 in Kurtines and Gewirtz, Moral Development.

Stewart, Rod. “Young Turks.” Tonight I'm Yours. Warner Brothers. 1981.

Stocker, Michael. “The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories.” The Journal of Philosophy 73:14 (August 12, 1976): 453–66. Reprint, pp. 531–40, Cahn and Haber, eds., Twentieth Century Ethical Theory.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sūn Yíràng 孫詒讓, Mòzǐ jiàngǔ 子閒詁. Reprint, 臺, 臺彎: 華正書局, 1987.

Tambiah, Stanley J. “A Performative Approach to Ritual.” Pp. 123–66 in Tambiah, Culture, Thought, and Social Action: An Anthropological Perspective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985.CrossRef Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles “What Is Human Agency?” Pp. 15–44 in Taylor, Human Agency and Language. Vol. 1 of Philosophical Papers. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRef Google Scholar

Taylor, Rodney L. “Religion and Utilitarianism: Mo Tzu on Spirits and Funerals.” Philosophy East and West 29:3 (July 1979): 337–46.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thakeray, William M.The Book of Snobs. Edited by John Sutherland. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Thomas, Elizabeth Marshall. The Tribe of Tiger. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994.Google Scholar

Trivers, Robert L. “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism.” Quaterly Review of Biology 46 (1971): 35–57.CrossRef Google Scholar

Troyer, John, ed. The Classic Utilitarians: Bentham and Mill. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar

Wei-ming, Tu. Centrality and Commonality: An Essay on Confucian Religiousness. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Turnbull, Colin. The Mountain People. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1973.Google Scholar

Van Norden, Bryan W. “America's Encounter with Confucian Thought: Three Trends.” Unpublished manuscript.

Norden, Bryan W. ed. Confucius and the Analects: New Essays. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Norden, Bryan W. “Kwong-loi Shun on Moral Reasons in Mencius.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 18:4 (1991): 353–70.Google Scholar

Norden, Bryan W. “Mencius on Courage.” Pp. 237–56 in Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, and Howard K. Wettstein, eds., The Philosophy of Religion. Vol. 21 of Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Norden, Bryan W. “Mencius and Augustine on Evil: A Test Case for Comparative Philosophy.” Pp. 313–36 in Bo Mou, ed., Two Roads to Wisdom? Chinese and Analytic Philosophies. Chicago: Open Court Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Van Norden, Bryan W. “Mengzi and Xunzi: Two Views of Human Agency.” Pp. 103–34 in Kline and Ivanhoe, Virtue, Nature and Agency in the Xunzi.

Van Norden, Bryan W. “Method in the Madness of the Laozi.” Pp. 187–210 in Csikszentmihalyi and Ivanhoe, Essays on Religious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi.

Norden, Bryan W.Review of Boston Confucianism, by Robert Neville. Philosophy East and West 53:3 (July 2003): 413–17.Google Scholar

Norden, Bryan W.Review of Thinking from the Han, by David Hall and Roger Ames. Pacific Affairs 73:2 (Summer 2000): 288–89.CrossRef Google Scholar

Norden, Bryan W.Review of Understanding Confucian Philosophy, by Liu Shu-hsien. Journal of Asian Studies 58:4 (November 1999): 114–15.Google Scholar

Van Norden, Bryan W. “Unweaving the ‘One Thread’ of Analects 4:15.” Pp. 216–36 in Van Norden, Confucius and the Analects.

Van Norden, Bryan W. “What Is Living and What Is Dead in the Philosophy of Zhu Xi?” Pp. 99–120 in Wang, Chinese Ethics in an Era of Globalization.

Van Norden, Bryan W. “What Should Western Philosophy Learn from Chinese Philosophy?” Pp. 224–49 in Ivanhoe, Chinese Language, Thought and Culture.

Norden, Bryan W. “Yearley on Mencius.” Journal of Religious Ethics 21:2 (Fall 1993): 369–76.Google Scholar

Zoeren, Stephen. Poetry and Personality. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Vlastos, Gregory. Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.CrossRef Google Scholar

Vorenkamp, Dirck. “Another Look at Utilitarianism in Mo-tzu's Thought.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 19 (1992): 423–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

Waley, Arthur, trans. The Analects of Confucius. New York: Vintage Books, 1938.Google Scholar

Waley, ArthurThree Ways of Thought in Ancient China. London: Allen & Unwin, 1939.Google Scholar

Walker, Ralph C. 2. “Theories of Truth.” Pp. 309–30 in Bob Hale and Crispin Wright, eds. A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. New York: Blackwell Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar

Wallace, James D.Virtues & Vices. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Waller, John. Einstein's Luck: The Truth behind Some of the Greatest Scientific Discoveries. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Wan Junren, “Contrasting Confucian Virtue Ethics and MacIntyre's Aristotelian Virtue Theory.” Pp. 123–49 in Wang, Chinese Philosophy in an Era of Globalization.

Wáng Bó 王. Jiǎnbó sīxiǎng wénxiàn lùnjí 帛思想文獻論集. 出思想文物與文獻研叢書. Taibei: Taiwan guji, 2001.

Wang, Robin R., ed. Chinese Philosophy in an Era of Globalization. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Wang, Robin R. ed. Images of Women in Chinese Thought and Culture: Writings from the Pre-Qin Period through the Song Dynasty. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar

Yangming, Wang. Instructions for Practical Living and Other Neo-Confucian Writings by Wang Yang-ming. Translated by Wing-tsit Chan. Reprint, New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Ware, James R., trans. The Sayings of Mencius. New York: Mentor Books, 1960.Google Scholar

Watson, Burton, trans. Hsun Tzu: Basic Writings. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Watson, BurtonMo Tzu: Basic Writings. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Wei, Cheng-t'ung. “Chu Hsi on the Standard and the Expedient.” Pp. 255–72 in Wing-tsit Chan, ed., Chu Hsi and Neo-Confucianism. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Wenzel, Christian Helmut. An Introduction to Kant's Aesthetics: Core Concepts and Problems. New York: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wenzel, Christian Helmut “Kant and Confucius on Beauty: A First Step.” Unpublished manuscript, 2005.

Westbrook, Robert B.John Dewey and American Democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Wiggins, David. “Deliberation and Practical Reason.” Pp. 221–40 in Rorty, Essays on Aristotle's Ethics.

Wiggins, David “Truth, Invention, and the Meaning of Life.” Pp. 541–72 in Cahn and Haber, Twentieth Century Ethical Theory.

Wilde, Oscar. The Picture of Dorian Gray. New York: Penguin Books, 1994.Google Scholar

Wilkes, Kathleen V. “The Good Man and the Good for Man in Aristotle's Ethics.” Pp. 341–57 in Rorty, Essays on Aristotle's Ethics.

Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Williams, BernardMorality: An Introduction to Ethics. 1972. Reprint, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Williams, BernardShame and Necessity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Wilson, Bryan R., ed. Rationality. Basil Blackwell, 1970.Google Scholar

Wilson, Stephen. “Conformity, Individuality and the Nature of Virtue: A Classical Confucian Contribution to Contemporary Ethical Reflection.” Pp. 94–115 in Van Norden, Confucius and the Analects.

Wong, Benjamin and Loy, Hui-Chieh. “War and Ghosts in Mozi's Political Philosophy.” Philosophy East and West 54:3 (July 2004): 343–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wong, David. “Universalism versus Love with Distinctions: An Ancient Debate Revived,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 16:3/4 (September/December 1989): 251–72.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wong, David “Reasons and Analogical Reasoning in Mengzi.” Pp. 187–220 in Liu and Ivanhoe, Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi.

Wu Ching-tzu [Wu Jingzi]. The Scholars. Translated by Yang Hsien-yi and Gladys Yang. New York: Columbia University Press, 1972.

Wú Yùjiàng 毓江, Mòzǐ jiàozhù 子校注. Edited by Sūn Qǐzhì 孫治. Xinbian Zhuzi jicheng. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1993.

Xing, Wen, ed. “The X Gong Xu: A Report and Papers from the Dartmouth Workshop,” International Research on Bamboo and Silk Documents: Newsletter 3:2–6 (December 2003).Google Scholar

Yates, Robin D. 2. “Early Poliorcetics: The Mohists to the Sung.” Pp. 241–485 in Joseph Needham and Robin D. S. Yates, eds. Science and Civilisation in China, vol. 5, part 6. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Yates, Robin D. 2. “The Mohists on Warfare: Technology, Technique, and Justification,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion Thematic Issue S (1980): 549–603.Google Scholar

Yates, Robin D. S. “Towards a Reconstruction of the Tactical Chapters of Mo-tzu.” Master's Thesis. University of California. 1975.

Yearley, Lee H. “Confucianism and Genre: Presentation and Persuasion in Early Confucian Thought.” Journal of Ecumenical Studies 40:1–2 (Winter-Spring 2003): 137–52.Google Scholar

Yearley, Lee H.Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of Virtue and Conceptions of Courage. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Zhào Qí 趙岐, Mèngzǐ zhù 孟子注.

Zhū Xī 朱熹. Sìshū jízhù 書集注.

Zhū Xī Zhūzǐ yǔlèi 朱子語類. 京: 中華書局, 1986.

Zong, Desheng. “Studies of Intensional Contexts in Mohist Writings.” Philosophy East and West 50:2 (April 2000): 208–28.Google Scholar

Zufferey, Nicolas. To the Origins of Confucianism: The Ru in Pre-Qin Times and during the Early Han Dynasty, Schweizer Asiatische Studien: Monographien 43. Bern: Peter Lang, 2003.