Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce, and Fishkin, James S.. Deliberation Day. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Alexander, Larry. “Introduction.” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, edited by Alexander, Larry, 1–13. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Alexander, Larry. “Is Judicial Review Democratic? A Comment on Harel.” Law and Philosophy 22, no. 3–4 (2003): 277–83.Google Scholar

Alexander, Larry. “The Constitution as Law.” Constitutional Commentary 6 (1989): 103ff.Google Scholar

Alexander, Larry, and Schauer, Frederick. “On Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation.” Harvard Law Review 110 (1997): 1359–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, Larry, and Solum, Lawrence B.. “Popular? Constitutionalism? A Book Review of the People Themselves by Larry D. Kramer.” Harvard Law Review 118, no. 5 (2005): 1594–640.Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert. “The Special Case Thesis.” Ratio Juris 12, no. 4 (1999): 374–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Ankersmit, F. R.Aesthetic Politics: Political Philosophy beyond Fact and Value. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Apel, Karl-Otto. “The a Priori of the Communication Community and the Foundations of Ethics.” In Towards a Transformation of Philosophy, 225–300. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Saint Thomas. Summa Theologiae. 60 vols. Vol. 43. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew. Civil Society, Constitution, and Legitimacy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Politics. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. New York: Random House, 1943.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . The Complete Works of Aristotle. Translated by Jonathan Barnes. 2 vols, Bollingen Series. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J.Social Choice and Individual Values. Second ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962).

Barber, Benjamin J.Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Barber, Sotirios A., and George, Robert P., eds. Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Barnett, Randy E.Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. The Supreme Court. Eighth ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Baynes, Kenneth. “Rights as Critique and the Critique of Rights: Karl Marx, Wendy Brown, and the Social Function of Rights.” Political Theory 28, no. 4 (2000): 451–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellamy, Richard. “The Political Form of the Constitution: The Separation of Powers, Rights and Representative Government.” Political Studies XLIV (1996): 436–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellamy, Richard, and Castiglione, Dario. “Introduction: Constitutions and Politics.” Political Studies XLIV (1996): 413–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla. “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, edited by Benhabib, Seyla, 67–94. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bennett, Robert W. “Counter-Conversationalism and the Sense of Difficulty.” Northwestern University Law Review 95, no. 3 (2001): 845–906.Google Scholar

Bennett, Robert W. Talking It Through: Puzzles of American Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Bickel, Alexander M.The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Second ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Bogdanor, Vernon. “Constitutional Reform in Britain: The Quiet Revolution.” Annual Review of Political Science 8, no. 1 (2005): 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohman, James. Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bohman, James. “Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 6, no. 4 (1998): 400–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bork, Robert H. “Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems.” Indiana Law Journal 47 (1971).Google Scholar

Brewer-Carías, Allan R.Judicial Review in Comparative Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Brigham, John. “The Constitution of the Supreme Court.” In The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations, edited by Gillman, Howard and Clayton, Cornell, 15–27. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999.Google Scholar

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

Brutus. “Letters Of “Brutus”.” In The Federalist with Letters of “Brutus,” edited by Ball, Terence, 433–533. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000).

Cappelletti, Mauro. Judicial Review in the Contemporary World. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1971.Google Scholar

Castiglione, Dario. “The Political Theory of the Constitution.” Political Studies XLIV (1996): 417–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, Simone. “Deliberative Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 6, no. 1 (2003): 307–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, Simone. “Democracy, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Legitimacy.” Constellations 11, no. 2 (2004): 153–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheeves, John. “Committee OKs Ban on Nude Club Dancing.” Lexington Herald-Leader, February 11, 2000, B 1.Google Scholar

Chemerinsky, Erwin. “The Supreme Court, 1988 Term – Foreword: The Vanishing Constitution.” Harvard Law Review 103 (1989): 43–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choper, Jesse H.Judicial Review and the National Political Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Christiano, Thomas. “Waldron on Law and Disagreement.” Law and Philosophy 19, no. 4 (2000): 513–43.Google Scholar

City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997).

Clayton, Cornell, and Gillman, Howard, eds. Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Clinton, Robert Lowry. “How the Court Became Supreme.” First Things 89 (1998): 13–19.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua. “An Epistemic Conception of Democracy.” Ethics 97 (1986): 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Joshua.1998. Dahl on Democracy and Equal Consideration. In, http://web.mit.edu/polisci/research/cohen/dahl_on_democracy.pdf (accessed March 31, 2005).

Cohen, Joshua.“Democracy and Liberty.” In Deliberative Democracy, edited by Elster, Jon, 185–231. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Joshua.“For a Democratic Society.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, edited by Freeman, Samuel, 86–138. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua.“Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, edited by Benhabib, Seyla, 95–119. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua, and Rogers, Joel. Associations and Democracy. London: Verso, 1995.Google Scholar

Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946).

Constant, Benjamin. “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with That of the Moderns.” In The Political Writings of Benjamin Constant, edited by Fontana, Biancamaria, 307–28. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958).

Corwin, Edward S.The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law. Binghamton, NY: Cornell University Press, 1955 (1928).Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A.A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6 (1957): 279–95.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A.“Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” In The Democracy Sourcebook, edited by Dahl, Robert A., Shapiro, Ian, and Antonio Cheibub, José, 246–51. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003 (1957).Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. How Democratic Is the American Constitution?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A., Shapiro, Ian, and Cheibub, José Antonio, eds. The Democracy Sourcebook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Davis v. Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109 (1986).

Carpini, Delli, Michael, X., Cook, Fay Lomax, and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. “Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science 7, no. 1 (2004): 315–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. Edited by Boydston, Jo Ann. Vol. 2: 1925–1927, The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Dicey, A. V.An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. 10th ed. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1965 (1908).Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: The Free Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857).

Dryzek, John S.Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John S. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. “Constitutionalism and Democracy.” European Journal of Philosophy 3, no. 1 (1995): 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. “The Model of Rules.” University of Chicago Law Review 35 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Nagel, Thomas, Nozick, Robert, Rawls, John, Scanlon, Thomas, and Jarvis Thomson, Judith. “Assisted Suicide: The Philosophers' Brief.” New York Review of Books, March 27 1997, 41–47.Google ScholarPubMed

Eisgruber, Christopher L.Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Eisgruber, Christopher L. “Disagreeable People.” Stanford Law Review 43 (1990): 275ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elk Grove Unified School District et al. v. Newdow et al., 542 U.S. 1 (2004).

Elster, Jon. “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, edited by Bohman, James and Rehg, William, 3–33. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Ely, John Hart. “Another Such Victory: Constitutional Theory and Practice in a World Where Courts Are No Different from Legislatures.” Virginia Law Review 77 (1991): 833–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ely, John Hart. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Ely, John Hart. On Constitutional Ground. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Lee. “Judicial Decision Making.” In Encyclopedia of Law & Society, edited by Clark, David C.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee. “The Comparative Advantage.” Law and Courts 9 (1999): 1–6.Google Scholar

Eskridge, William N., Jr., and John Ferejohn. “Politics, Interpretation, and the Rule of Law.” In The Rule of Law: Nomos XXXVI, edited by Shapiro, Ian, 265–2894. New York: New York University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Estlund, David M. “Beyond Fairness and Deliberation: The Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, edited by Bohman, James and Rehg, William, 173–204. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Fabre, Cécile. “A Philosophical Argument for a Bill of Rights.” British Journal of Political Science 30 (2000): 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fallon, Richard H. Jr. “Legitimacy and the Constitution.” Harvard Law Review 118, no. 6 (2005): 1787–1853.Google Scholar

Favoreu, Louis. “Constitutional Review in Europe.” In Constitutionalism and Rights: The Influence of the United States Constitution Abroad, edited by Henkin, Louis and Rosenthal, Albert J., 38–62. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John. “Constitutional Review in the Global Context.” New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy 6 (2002–2003): 49–59.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John.“Instituting Deliberative Democracy.” In Designing Democratic Institutions, edited by Shapiro, Ian and Macedo, Stephen, 75–104. New York: New York University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John. “Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law.” Hoover Digest (2003).Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John, and Pasquino, Pasquale. “Constitutional Adjudication: Lessons from Europe.” Texas Law Review 82 (2004): 1671–1704.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John, Jack N. Rakove, and Jonathan Riley. “Editors' Introduction.” In Constitutional Culture and Democratic Rule, edited by Ferejohn, John, Rakove, Jack N. and Riley, Jonathan, 1–37. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finn, John E. “The Civic Constitution: Some Preliminaries.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, edited by Barber, Sotirios A. and George, Robert P., 41–69. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights. London: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James S. 2004. Deliberative Polling®: Toward a Better-Informed Democracy. In, http://cdd.stanford.edu/polls/docs/summary/ (accessed June 15, 2005).

Fishkin, James S. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James S. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. expanded ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James S., and Robert C. Luskin. 2004. Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion. In, http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/index.html (accessed June 15, 2005).

Forst, Rainer. “The Rule of Reasons: Three Models of Deliberative Democracy.” Ratio Juris 14, no. 4 (2001): 345–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, Samuel. “Constitutional Democracy and the Legitimacy of Judicial Review.” Law and Philosophy 9 (1990–1991): 327–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, Samuel. “Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Critique.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29, no. 4 (2000): 371–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, Lon L.The Morality of Law. Revised ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Fung, Archon. “Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 11, no. 3 (2003): 338–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardbaum, Stephen. “The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism.” American Journal of Comparative Law 49, no. 4 (2001): 707–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. “Democratic Deliberation within.” In Debating Deliberative Democracy, edited by Fishkin, James S. and Laslett, Peter, 54–79. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, Scott. Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Graber, Mark A. “The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary.” Studies in American Political Development 7 (1993): 35–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (1963).

Grey, Thomas C. “Constitutionalism: An Analytic Framework.” In Constitutionalism, edited by Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W., 189–209. New York: New York University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Griffin, Stephen M.American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).

Günther, Klaus. The Sense of Appropriateness: Application Discourses in Morality and Law. Translated by John Farell. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “A Short Reply.” Ratio Juris 12, no. 4 (1999): 445–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?” Political Theory 29, no. 6 (2001): 766–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “On Law and Disagreement: Some Comments On ‘Interpretive Pluralism’.” Ratio Juris 16, no. 2 (2003): 187–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen.The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Edited by Cronin, Ciaran and Greiff, Pablo. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. The Federalist with Letters of “Brutus,” Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Hand, Learned. “Democracy: Its Presumptions and Realities.” In The Spirit of Liberty: Papers and Addresses of Learned Hand, edited by Dilliard, Irving, 90–102. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1960 [1932].Google Scholar

Hand, Learned. The Bill of Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harel, Alon. “Rights-Based Judicial Review: A Democratic Justification.” Law and Philosophy 22, no. 3–4 (2003): 247–76.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A.The Concept of Law. Second ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A.The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Edited by Tuck, Richard, Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. “Gag Rules or the Politics of Omission.” In Constitutionalism and Democracy, edited by Elster, Jon and Slagstad, Rune, 19–58. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen.“Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy.” In Constitutionalism and Democracy, edited by Elster, Jon and Slagstad, Rune, 195–240. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Stephen, and Cass R. Sunstein. “The Politics of Constitutional Revision in Eastern Europe.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Levinson, Sanford, 275–306. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hume, David. “An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals.” In Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Human Morals, edited by Nidditch, P. H.. New York: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Jacob, Herbert. “Introduction.” In Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective, edited by Jacob, Herbert, Blankenberg, Erhard, Kritzer, Herbert M., Marie Provine, Doris and Sanders, Joseph, 1–15. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Jacob, Herbert, Blankenberg, Erhard, Kritzer, Herbert M., Provine, Doris Marie, and Sanders, Joseph. Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Kalyvas, Andreas. “Popular Sovereignty, Democracy, and the Constituent Power.” Constellations 12, no. 5 (2005): 223–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. “Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose.” In Kant's Political Writings, edited by Reiss, Hans, 41–53. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Kavanagh, Aileen. “Participation and Judicial Review: A Reply to Jeremy Waldron.” Law and Philosophy 22, no. 5 (2003): 451–86.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. Translated by Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson. New York: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. “Judicial Review of Legislation. A Comparative Study of the Austrian and the American Constitution.” Journal of Politics 4, no. 2 (1942): 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klarman, Michael J.From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Koopmans, Tim. Courts and Political Institutions: A Comparative View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramer, Larry D.The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Kritzer, Herbert M. “Courts, Justice, and Politics in England.” In Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective, edited by Jacob, Herbert, Blankenburg, Erhard, Kritzer, Herbert M., Provine, Doris Marie and Sanders, Joseph, 81–176. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Lawrence et al. v. Texas, 539 US 558 (2003).

Leib, Ethan J. “Towards a Practice of Deliberative Democracy: A Proposal for a Popular Branch.” Rutgers Law Journal 33 (2002): 359–456.Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford, ed. Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).

Locke, John. “The Second Treatise of Government.” In Two Treatises of Government, edited by Laslett, Peter, 265–428. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Locke, John.Two Treatises of Government. Edited by Laslett, Peter. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63 (2003).

Luskin, Robert C., James S. Fishkin, and Dennis L. Plane. 1999. Deliberative Polling and Policy Outcomes: Electric Utility Issues in Texas. In, http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/index.html. (accessed June 16, 2005).

Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1 (1849).

Lutz, Donald S. “Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Levinson, Sanford, 237–74. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacCormick, Neil. “The Relative Heteronomy of Law.” European Journal of Philosophy 3, no. 1 (1995): 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maddex, Robert E.Constitutions of the World. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 2001.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 15, no. 3 (1987): 338–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).

Marmor, Andrei. “The Rule of Law and Its Limits.” Law and Philosophy 23, no. 1 (2004): 1–43.Google Scholar

Marshall, T. H.Citizenship and Social Class. London: Cambridge University Press, 1950.Google Scholar

Mavcic, Arne. 2004. A Tabular Presentation of Constitutional/Judicial Review around the World. In http://www.concourts.net/index.html (accessed December 21, 2004).

McCann, Michael. “How the Supreme Court Matters in American Politics: New Institutionalist Perspectives.” In The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations, edited by Gillman, Howard and Clayton, Cornell, 63–97. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Thomas. “Enlightenment and the Public Use of Reason.” European Journal of Philosophy 3, no. 3 (1995): 242–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarthy, Thomas. “Legitimacy and Diversity: Dialectical Reflections on Analytic Distinctions.” Cardozo Law Review 17, no. 4–5 (1996): 1083–125.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Thomas. “Practical Discourse: On the Relation of Morality to Politics.” In Ideals and Illusions: On Reconstruction and Deconstruction in Contemporary Critical Theory, 181–99. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar

McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819).

McGuire, Kevin T. “The Supreme Court Bar and Institutional Relationships.” In The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations, edited by Gillman, Howard and Clayton, Cornell, 115–32. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I.Brennan and Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I.“Constitutional Authorship.” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, edited by Alexander, Larry, 64–98. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I. “Family Quarrel.” Cardozo Law Review 17, no. 4–5 (1996): 1163–77.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I. “Morality, Identity and ‘Constitutional Patriotism.’” Denver University Law Review 76, no. 4 (1999): 1009–28.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I.“The Problem of Constitutional Interpretive Disagreement: Can ‘Discourses of Application’ Help?” In Habermas and Pragmatism, edited by Aboulafia, Mitchell, Bookman, Myra and Kemp, Catherine, 113–38. New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I. “The Supreme Court, 1985 Term – Forward: Traces of Self-Government.” Harvard Law Review 100, no. 4 (1986): 4–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

Moon, J. Donald. “Rawls and Habermas on Public Reason: Human Rights and Global Justice.” Annual Review of Political Science 6, no. 1 (2003): 257–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, Coleen. “Lon Fuller and the Moral Value of the Rule of Law.” Law and Philosophy 24, no. 3 (2005): 239–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, Robert F. “Interpretation and Importance in Constitutional Law: A Re-Assessment of Judicial Restraint.” In Liberal Democracy, edited by Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W., 181–207. New York: New York University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Nino, Carlos Santiago. The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Noonan, John T. JrNarrowing the Nation's Power: The Supreme Court Sides with the States. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar

O'Connor, Sandra Day, and Williams, Pete. “The Majesty of the Law: An Interview with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.” In University of Louisville Kentucky Author Forum. Louisville, KY: WFPL, 2003.Google Scholar

Paulsen, Michael Stokes. “The Irrepressible Myth of Marbury.” Michigan Law Review 101 (2003): 601–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peretti, Terri Jennings. In Defense of a Political Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Perry, Michael J.The Constitution in the Courts: Law or Politics?New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Perry, Michael J. The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legitimacy of Constitutional Policymaking by the Judiciary. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Perry, Michael J. The Idea of Human Rights: Four Inquiries. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Perry, Michael J.“What Is ‘the Constitution’? (and Other Fundamental Questions).” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, edited by Alexander, Larry, 99–151. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Peterson, Victor. “A Discourse Theory of Moral Judgment.” Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University, 1998.

Pickerill, J. Mitchell. Constitutional Deliberation in Congress: The Impact of Judicial Review in a Separated System. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1895).

Posner, Richard A.Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Preuß, Ulrich K. “Constitutionalism.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Craig, Edward, 618–22. New York: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Provine, Doris Marie. “Courts in the Political Process in France.” In Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective, edited by Jacob, Herbert, Blankenburg, Erhard, Kritzer, Herbert M., Provine, Doris Marie and Sanders, Joseph, 177–248. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense.” In Democracy's Value, edited by Shapiro, Ian and Casiano, Hacker-Cordón, 23–55. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Radin, Jane. “Reconsidering the Rule of Law.” Boston University Law Review 69 (1989): 785ff.Google Scholar

Railton, Peter. “Judicial Review, Elites, and Liberal Democracy.” In Liberal Democracy, edited by Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W., 153–80. New York: New York University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Paperback ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Rawls, John.“The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” In Collected Papers, edited by Freeman, Samuel, 573–615. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. “On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries.” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, edited by Alexander, Larry, 152–93. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. “The Rule of Law and Its Virtue.” In The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rehg, William. Insight and Solidarity: A Study in the Discourse Ethics of Jürgen Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964).

Riker, William H.Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).

Romer, Governor of Colorado, et al. v. Evans et al., 517 U.S. 620 (1996).

Rosenbaum, Alan S. “Introduction.” In Constitutionalism: The Philosophical Dimension, edited by Rosenbaum, Alan S., 1–6. New York: Greenwood Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Gerald N.The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change?Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Michel. “The Rule of Law and the Legitimacy of Constitutional Democracy.” Southern California Law Review 74, no. 5 (2001): 1307–51.Google Scholar

Rostow, Eugene V. “The Democratic Character of Judicial Review.” Harvard Law Review 66 (1952): 193–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discourse on Political Economy and the Social Contract. Translated by Christopher Betts. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques.“Of the Social Contract.” In The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, edited by Gourevitch, Victor. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Rubenfeld, Jed. Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self-Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryfe, David M. “Does Deliberative Democracy Work?” Annual Review of Political Science 8, no. 1 (2005): 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sager, Lawrence G.Justice in Plainclothes: A Theory of Constitutional Practice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Saward, Michael. The Terms of Democracy. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1998.Google Scholar

Scalia, Antonin. “Common-Law Courts in a Civil-Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting the Constitution and the Laws.” In A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law, edited by Gutmann, Amy, 3–47. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A.Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1943.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Martin. “The Success of Judicial Review and Democracy.” In On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, edited by Shapiro, Martin and Sweet, Alec Stone, 149–83. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Martin, and Alec Stone Sweet. “Abstract Review and Judicial Law-Making.” In On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, edited by Shapiro, Martin and Sweet, Alec Stone, 343–75. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Martin, and Sweet, Alec Stone. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 (1983).

Spaeth, Harold J. 1998. United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, 1953–1997 Terms. In, Michigan State University, Dept. of Political Science, http://webapp.icpsr.umich.edu/cocoon/ICPSR-STUDY/09422.xml. (accessed January 10, 2005).

Spector, Horacio. “Judicial Review, Rights, and Democracy.” Law and Philosophy 22, no. 3–4 (2003): 285–334.Google Scholar

Stone, Alec. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France: The Constitutional Council in Comparative Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Strauss, David A. “Constitutions, Written and Otherwise.” Law and Philosophy 19, no. 4 (2000): 451–64.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R.Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. The Partial Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Sweet, Alec Stone. “Constitutional Politics in France and Germany.” In On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, edited by Shapiro, Martin and Sweet, Alec Stone, 184–208. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweet, Alec Stone. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweet, Alec Stone.“Path Dependence, Precedent, and Judicial Power.” In On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, edited by Shapiro, Martin and Sweet, Alec Stone, 113–35. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tate, Neal, and Vallinder, Thorsten, eds. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Thomas, George. “Recovering the Political Constitution: The Madisonian Vision.” The Review of Politics 66, no. 2 (2004): 233–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tribe, Lawrence H. “The Puzzling Persistence of Process-Based Constitutional Theories.” Yale Law Journal 89, no. 6 (1980): 1063–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tullis, Jeffrey K. “Deliberation between Institutions.” In Debating Deliberative Democracy, edited by Fishkin, James S. and Laslett, Peter, 200–11. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. “Forms of Judicial Review as Expressions of Constitutional Patriotism.” Law and Philosophy 22, no. 3–4 (2003): 353–79.Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution away from the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

United States v. Carolene Products Co., 304 U.S. 144 (1938).

Vacco v. Quill, 521 US 793 (1997).

Vieth et al. v. Jubelirer, 541 US 267 (2004).

Waldron, Jeremy. “A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13 (1993): 18–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Freeman's Defense of Judicial Review.” Law and Philosophy 13 (1994): 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (in Florida)?” Law and Philosophy 21 (2002): 137–64.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Judicial Review and the Conditions of Democracy.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 6, no. 4 (1998): 335–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Rights and Majorities: Rousseau Revisited.” In Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991, 392–421. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. The Dignity of Legislation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, Neil. “The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism.” The Modern Law Review 65, no. 3 (2002): 317–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997).

Whittington, Keith E.Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Wolin, Sheldon S. “The Liberal/Democratic Divide: On Rawls's Political Liberalism.” Political Theory 24, no. 1 (1996): 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zurn, Christopher F. “Deliberative Democracy and Constitutional Review.” Law and Philosophy 21 (2002): 467–542.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce, and Fishkin, James S.. Deliberation Day. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Alexander, Larry. “Introduction.” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, edited by Alexander, Larry, 1–13. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Alexander, Larry. “Is Judicial Review Democratic? A Comment on Harel.” Law and Philosophy 22, no. 3–4 (2003): 277–83.Google Scholar

Alexander, Larry. “The Constitution as Law.” Constitutional Commentary 6 (1989): 103ff.Google Scholar

Alexander, Larry, and Schauer, Frederick. “On Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation.” Harvard Law Review 110 (1997): 1359–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, Larry, and Solum, Lawrence B.. “Popular? Constitutionalism? A Book Review of the People Themselves by Larry D. Kramer.” Harvard Law Review 118, no. 5 (2005): 1594–640.Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert. “The Special Case Thesis.” Ratio Juris 12, no. 4 (1999): 374–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Ankersmit, F. R.Aesthetic Politics: Political Philosophy beyond Fact and Value. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Apel, Karl-Otto. “The a Priori of the Communication Community and the Foundations of Ethics.” In Towards a Transformation of Philosophy, 225–300. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Saint Thomas. Summa Theologiae. 60 vols. Vol. 43. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.Google Scholar

Arato, Andrew. Civil Society, Constitution, and Legitimacy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2000.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Politics. Translated by Benjamin Jowett. New York: Random House, 1943.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . The Complete Works of Aristotle. Translated by Jonathan Barnes. 2 vols, Bollingen Series. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth J.Social Choice and Individual Values. Second ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962).

Barber, Benjamin J.Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Barber, Sotirios A., and George, Robert P., eds. Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Barnett, Randy E.Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. The Supreme Court. Eighth ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Baynes, Kenneth. “Rights as Critique and the Critique of Rights: Karl Marx, Wendy Brown, and the Social Function of Rights.” Political Theory 28, no. 4 (2000): 451–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellamy, Richard. “The Political Form of the Constitution: The Separation of Powers, Rights and Representative Government.” Political Studies XLIV (1996): 436–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellamy, Richard, and Castiglione, Dario. “Introduction: Constitutions and Politics.” Political Studies XLIV (1996): 413–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla. “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, edited by Benhabib, Seyla, 67–94. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bennett, Robert W. “Counter-Conversationalism and the Sense of Difficulty.” Northwestern University Law Review 95, no. 3 (2001): 845–906.Google Scholar

Bennett, Robert W. Talking It Through: Puzzles of American Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Bickel, Alexander M.The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Second ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Bogdanor, Vernon. “Constitutional Reform in Britain: The Quiet Revolution.” Annual Review of Political Science 8, no. 1 (2005): 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohman, James. Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bohman, James. “Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 6, no. 4 (1998): 400–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bork, Robert H. “Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems.” Indiana Law Journal 47 (1971).Google Scholar

Brewer-Carías, Allan R.Judicial Review in Comparative Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Brigham, John. “The Constitution of the Supreme Court.” In The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations, edited by Gillman, Howard and Clayton, Cornell, 15–27. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999.Google Scholar

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

Brutus. “Letters Of “Brutus”.” In The Federalist with Letters of “Brutus,” edited by Ball, Terence, 433–533. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000).

Cappelletti, Mauro. Judicial Review in the Contemporary World. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1971.Google Scholar

Castiglione, Dario. “The Political Theory of the Constitution.” Political Studies XLIV (1996): 417–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, Simone. “Deliberative Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 6, no. 1 (2003): 307–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, Simone. “Democracy, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Legitimacy.” Constellations 11, no. 2 (2004): 153–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheeves, John. “Committee OKs Ban on Nude Club Dancing.” Lexington Herald-Leader, February 11, 2000, B 1.Google Scholar

Chemerinsky, Erwin. “The Supreme Court, 1988 Term – Foreword: The Vanishing Constitution.” Harvard Law Review 103 (1989): 43–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choper, Jesse H.Judicial Review and the National Political Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Christiano, Thomas. “Waldron on Law and Disagreement.” Law and Philosophy 19, no. 4 (2000): 513–43.Google Scholar

City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997).

Clayton, Cornell, and Gillman, Howard, eds. Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Clinton, Robert Lowry. “How the Court Became Supreme.” First Things 89 (1998): 13–19.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua. “An Epistemic Conception of Democracy.” Ethics 97 (1986): 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Joshua.1998. Dahl on Democracy and Equal Consideration. In, http://web.mit.edu/polisci/research/cohen/dahl_on_democracy.pdf (accessed March 31, 2005).

Cohen, Joshua.“Democracy and Liberty.” In Deliberative Democracy, edited by Elster, Jon, 185–231. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Joshua.“For a Democratic Society.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, edited by Freeman, Samuel, 86–138. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua.“Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, edited by Benhabib, Seyla, 95–119. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua, and Rogers, Joel. Associations and Democracy. London: Verso, 1995.Google Scholar

Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946).

Constant, Benjamin. “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with That of the Moderns.” In The Political Writings of Benjamin Constant, edited by Fontana, Biancamaria, 307–28. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958).

Corwin, Edward S.The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law. Binghamton, NY: Cornell University Press, 1955 (1928).Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A.A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6 (1957): 279–95.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A.“Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” In The Democracy Sourcebook, edited by Dahl, Robert A., Shapiro, Ian, and Antonio Cheibub, José, 246–51. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003 (1957).Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. How Democratic Is the American Constitution?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A., Shapiro, Ian, and Cheibub, José Antonio, eds. The Democracy Sourcebook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Davis v. Bandemer, 478 U.S. 109 (1986).

Carpini, Delli, Michael, X., Cook, Fay Lomax, and Jacobs, Lawrence R.. “Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Annual Review of Political Science 7, no. 1 (2004): 315–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, John. The Public and Its Problems. Edited by Boydston, Jo Ann. Vol. 2: 1925–1927, The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Dicey, A. V.An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. 10th ed. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1965 (1908).Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: The Free Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857).

Dryzek, John S.Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John S. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. “Constitutionalism and Democracy.” European Journal of Philosophy 3, no. 1 (1995): 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. “The Model of Rules.” University of Chicago Law Review 35 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald, Nagel, Thomas, Nozick, Robert, Rawls, John, Scanlon, Thomas, and Jarvis Thomson, Judith. “Assisted Suicide: The Philosophers' Brief.” New York Review of Books, March 27 1997, 41–47.Google ScholarPubMed

Eisgruber, Christopher L.Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Eisgruber, Christopher L. “Disagreeable People.” Stanford Law Review 43 (1990): 275ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elk Grove Unified School District et al. v. Newdow et al., 542 U.S. 1 (2004).

Elster, Jon. “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, edited by Bohman, James and Rehg, William, 3–33. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Ely, John Hart. “Another Such Victory: Constitutional Theory and Practice in a World Where Courts Are No Different from Legislatures.” Virginia Law Review 77 (1991): 833–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ely, John Hart. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Ely, John Hart. On Constitutional Ground. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epstein, Lee. “Judicial Decision Making.” In Encyclopedia of Law & Society, edited by Clark, David C.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee. “The Comparative Advantage.” Law and Courts 9 (1999): 1–6.Google Scholar

Eskridge, William N., Jr., and John Ferejohn. “Politics, Interpretation, and the Rule of Law.” In The Rule of Law: Nomos XXXVI, edited by Shapiro, Ian, 265–2894. New York: New York University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Estlund, David M. “Beyond Fairness and Deliberation: The Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, edited by Bohman, James and Rehg, William, 173–204. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Fabre, Cécile. “A Philosophical Argument for a Bill of Rights.” British Journal of Political Science 30 (2000): 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fallon, Richard H. Jr. “Legitimacy and the Constitution.” Harvard Law Review 118, no. 6 (2005): 1787–1853.Google Scholar

Favoreu, Louis. “Constitutional Review in Europe.” In Constitutionalism and Rights: The Influence of the United States Constitution Abroad, edited by Henkin, Louis and Rosenthal, Albert J., 38–62. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John. “Constitutional Review in the Global Context.” New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy 6 (2002–2003): 49–59.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John.“Instituting Deliberative Democracy.” In Designing Democratic Institutions, edited by Shapiro, Ian and Macedo, Stephen, 75–104. New York: New York University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John. “Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law.” Hoover Digest (2003).Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John, and Pasquino, Pasquale. “Constitutional Adjudication: Lessons from Europe.” Texas Law Review 82 (2004): 1671–1704.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John, Jack N. Rakove, and Jonathan Riley. “Editors' Introduction.” In Constitutional Culture and Democratic Rule, edited by Ferejohn, John, Rakove, Jack N. and Riley, Jonathan, 1–37. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finn, John E. “The Civic Constitution: Some Preliminaries.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, edited by Barber, Sotirios A. and George, Robert P., 41–69. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights. London: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James S. 2004. Deliberative Polling®: Toward a Better-Informed Democracy. In, http://cdd.stanford.edu/polls/docs/summary/ (accessed June 15, 2005).

Fishkin, James S. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James S. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. expanded ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James S., and Robert C. Luskin. 2004. Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion. In, http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/index.html (accessed June 15, 2005).

Forst, Rainer. “The Rule of Reasons: Three Models of Deliberative Democracy.” Ratio Juris 14, no. 4 (2001): 345–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, Samuel. “Constitutional Democracy and the Legitimacy of Judicial Review.” Law and Philosophy 9 (1990–1991): 327–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, Samuel. “Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Critique.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29, no. 4 (2000): 371–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, Lon L.The Morality of Law. Revised ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Fung, Archon. “Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 11, no. 3 (2003): 338–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardbaum, Stephen. “The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism.” American Journal of Comparative Law 49, no. 4 (2001): 707–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. “Democratic Deliberation within.” In Debating Deliberative Democracy, edited by Fishkin, James S. and Laslett, Peter, 54–79. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, Scott. Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Graber, Mark A. “The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary.” Studies in American Political Development 7 (1993): 35–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (1963).

Grey, Thomas C. “Constitutionalism: An Analytic Framework.” In Constitutionalism, edited by Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W., 189–209. New York: New York University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Griffin, Stephen M.American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).

Günther, Klaus. The Sense of Appropriateness: Application Discourses in Morality and Law. Translated by John Farell. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “A Short Reply.” Ratio Juris 12, no. 4 (1999): 445–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?” Political Theory 29, no. 6 (2001): 766–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. “On Law and Disagreement: Some Comments On ‘Interpretive Pluralism’.” Ratio Juris 16, no. 2 (2003): 187–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen.The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Edited by Cronin, Ciaran and Greiff, Pablo. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. The Federalist with Letters of “Brutus,” Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Hand, Learned. “Democracy: Its Presumptions and Realities.” In The Spirit of Liberty: Papers and Addresses of Learned Hand, edited by Dilliard, Irving, 90–102. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1960 [1932].Google Scholar

Hand, Learned. The Bill of Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harel, Alon. “Rights-Based Judicial Review: A Democratic Justification.” Law and Philosophy 22, no. 3–4 (2003): 247–76.Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A.The Concept of Law. Second ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A.The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Edited by Tuck, Richard, Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. “Gag Rules or the Politics of Omission.” In Constitutionalism and Democracy, edited by Elster, Jon and Slagstad, Rune, 19–58. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen.“Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy.” In Constitutionalism and Democracy, edited by Elster, Jon and Slagstad, Rune, 195–240. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Stephen, and Cass R. Sunstein. “The Politics of Constitutional Revision in Eastern Europe.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Levinson, Sanford, 275–306. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hume, David. “An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals.” In Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Human Morals, edited by Nidditch, P. H.. New York: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Jacob, Herbert. “Introduction.” In Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective, edited by Jacob, Herbert, Blankenberg, Erhard, Kritzer, Herbert M., Marie Provine, Doris and Sanders, Joseph, 1–15. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Jacob, Herbert, Blankenberg, Erhard, Kritzer, Herbert M., Provine, Doris Marie, and Sanders, Joseph. Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Kalyvas, Andreas. “Popular Sovereignty, Democracy, and the Constituent Power.” Constellations 12, no. 5 (2005): 223–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. “Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose.” In Kant's Political Writings, edited by Reiss, Hans, 41–53. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Kavanagh, Aileen. “Participation and Judicial Review: A Reply to Jeremy Waldron.” Law and Philosophy 22, no. 5 (2003): 451–86.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. Translated by Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson. New York: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. “Judicial Review of Legislation. A Comparative Study of the Austrian and the American Constitution.” Journal of Politics 4, no. 2 (1942): 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klarman, Michael J.From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Koopmans, Tim. Courts and Political Institutions: A Comparative View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramer, Larry D.The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Kritzer, Herbert M. “Courts, Justice, and Politics in England.” In Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective, edited by Jacob, Herbert, Blankenburg, Erhard, Kritzer, Herbert M., Provine, Doris Marie and Sanders, Joseph, 81–176. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Lawrence et al. v. Texas, 539 US 558 (2003).

Leib, Ethan J. “Towards a Practice of Deliberative Democracy: A Proposal for a Popular Branch.” Rutgers Law Journal 33 (2002): 359–456.Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford, ed. Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).

Locke, John. “The Second Treatise of Government.” In Two Treatises of Government, edited by Laslett, Peter, 265–428. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Locke, John.Two Treatises of Government. Edited by Laslett, Peter. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63 (2003).

Luskin, Robert C., James S. Fishkin, and Dennis L. Plane. 1999. Deliberative Polling and Policy Outcomes: Electric Utility Issues in Texas. In, http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/index.html. (accessed June 16, 2005).

Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1 (1849).

Lutz, Donald S. “Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment.” In Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, edited by Levinson, Sanford, 237–74. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacCormick, Neil. “The Relative Heteronomy of Law.” European Journal of Philosophy 3, no. 1 (1995): 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maddex, Robert E.Constitutions of the World. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 2001.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 15, no. 3 (1987): 338–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).

Marmor, Andrei. “The Rule of Law and Its Limits.” Law and Philosophy 23, no. 1 (2004): 1–43.Google Scholar

Marshall, T. H.Citizenship and Social Class. London: Cambridge University Press, 1950.Google Scholar

Mavcic, Arne. 2004. A Tabular Presentation of Constitutional/Judicial Review around the World. In http://www.concourts.net/index.html (accessed December 21, 2004).

McCann, Michael. “How the Supreme Court Matters in American Politics: New Institutionalist Perspectives.” In The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations, edited by Gillman, Howard and Clayton, Cornell, 63–97. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Thomas. “Enlightenment and the Public Use of Reason.” European Journal of Philosophy 3, no. 3 (1995): 242–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarthy, Thomas. “Legitimacy and Diversity: Dialectical Reflections on Analytic Distinctions.” Cardozo Law Review 17, no. 4–5 (1996): 1083–125.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Thomas. “Practical Discourse: On the Relation of Morality to Politics.” In Ideals and Illusions: On Reconstruction and Deconstruction in Contemporary Critical Theory, 181–99. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar

McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819).

McGuire, Kevin T. “The Supreme Court Bar and Institutional Relationships.” In The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations, edited by Gillman, Howard and Clayton, Cornell, 115–32. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I.Brennan and Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I.“Constitutional Authorship.” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, edited by Alexander, Larry, 64–98. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I. “Family Quarrel.” Cardozo Law Review 17, no. 4–5 (1996): 1163–77.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I. “Morality, Identity and ‘Constitutional Patriotism.’” Denver University Law Review 76, no. 4 (1999): 1009–28.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I.“The Problem of Constitutional Interpretive Disagreement: Can ‘Discourses of Application’ Help?” In Habermas and Pragmatism, edited by Aboulafia, Mitchell, Bookman, Myra and Kemp, Catherine, 113–38. New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank I. “The Supreme Court, 1985 Term – Forward: Traces of Self-Government.” Harvard Law Review 100, no. 4 (1986): 4–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

Moon, J. Donald. “Rawls and Habermas on Public Reason: Human Rights and Global Justice.” Annual Review of Political Science 6, no. 1 (2003): 257–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, Coleen. “Lon Fuller and the Moral Value of the Rule of Law.” Law and Philosophy 24, no. 3 (2005): 239–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, Robert F. “Interpretation and Importance in Constitutional Law: A Re-Assessment of Judicial Restraint.” In Liberal Democracy, edited by Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W., 181–207. New York: New York University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Nino, Carlos Santiago. The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Noonan, John T. JrNarrowing the Nation's Power: The Supreme Court Sides with the States. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar

O'Connor, Sandra Day, and Williams, Pete. “The Majesty of the Law: An Interview with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.” In University of Louisville Kentucky Author Forum. Louisville, KY: WFPL, 2003.Google Scholar

Paulsen, Michael Stokes. “The Irrepressible Myth of Marbury.” Michigan Law Review 101 (2003): 601–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peretti, Terri Jennings. In Defense of a Political Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Perry, Michael J.The Constitution in the Courts: Law or Politics?New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Perry, Michael J. The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legitimacy of Constitutional Policymaking by the Judiciary. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Perry, Michael J. The Idea of Human Rights: Four Inquiries. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Perry, Michael J.“What Is ‘the Constitution’? (and Other Fundamental Questions).” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, edited by Alexander, Larry, 99–151. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Peterson, Victor. “A Discourse Theory of Moral Judgment.” Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University, 1998.

Pickerill, J. Mitchell. Constitutional Deliberation in Congress: The Impact of Judicial Review in a Separated System. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1895).

Posner, Richard A.Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Preuß, Ulrich K. “Constitutionalism.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Craig, Edward, 618–22. New York: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Provine, Doris Marie. “Courts in the Political Process in France.” In Courts, Law, and Politics in Comparative Perspective, edited by Jacob, Herbert, Blankenburg, Erhard, Kritzer, Herbert M., Provine, Doris Marie and Sanders, Joseph, 177–248. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense.” In Democracy's Value, edited by Shapiro, Ian and Casiano, Hacker-Cordón, 23–55. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Radin, Jane. “Reconsidering the Rule of Law.” Boston University Law Review 69 (1989): 785ff.Google Scholar

Railton, Peter. “Judicial Review, Elites, and Liberal Democracy.” In Liberal Democracy, edited by Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W., 153–80. New York: New York University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Paperback ed. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Rawls, John.“The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” In Collected Papers, edited by Freeman, Samuel, 573–615. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. “On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries.” In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, edited by Alexander, Larry, 152–93. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Raz, Joseph. “The Rule of Law and Its Virtue.” In The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rehg, William. Insight and Solidarity: A Study in the Discourse Ethics of Jürgen Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964).

Riker, William H.Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).

Romer, Governor of Colorado, et al. v. Evans et al., 517 U.S. 620 (1996).

Rosenbaum, Alan S. “Introduction.” In Constitutionalism: The Philosophical Dimension, edited by Rosenbaum, Alan S., 1–6. New York: Greenwood Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Gerald N.The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change?Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Michel. “The Rule of Law and the Legitimacy of Constitutional Democracy.” Southern California Law Review 74, no. 5 (2001): 1307–51.Google Scholar

Rostow, Eugene V. “The Democratic Character of Judicial Review.” Harvard Law Review 66 (1952): 193–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discourse on Political Economy and the Social Contract. Translated by Christopher Betts. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques.“Of the Social Contract.” In The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, edited by Gourevitch, Victor. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Rubenfeld, Jed. Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self-Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryfe, David M. “Does Deliberative Democracy Work?” Annual Review of Political Science 8, no. 1 (2005): 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sager, Lawrence G.Justice in Plainclothes: A Theory of Constitutional Practice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Saward, Michael. The Terms of Democracy. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1998.Google Scholar

Scalia, Antonin. “Common-Law Courts in a Civil-Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting the Constitution and the Laws.” In A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law, edited by Gutmann, Amy, 3–47. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A.Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1943.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Martin. “The Success of Judicial Review and Democracy.” In On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, edited by Shapiro, Martin and Sweet, Alec Stone, 149–83. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Martin, and Alec Stone Sweet. “Abstract Review and Judicial Law-Making.” In On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, edited by Shapiro, Martin and Sweet, Alec Stone, 343–75. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Martin, and Sweet, Alec Stone. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 (1983).

Spaeth, Harold J. 1998. United States Supreme Court Judicial Database, 1953–1997 Terms. In, Michigan State University, Dept. of Political Science, http://webapp.icpsr.umich.edu/cocoon/ICPSR-STUDY/09422.xml. (accessed January 10, 2005).

Spector, Horacio. “Judicial Review, Rights, and Democracy.” Law and Philosophy 22, no. 3–4 (2003): 285–334.Google Scholar

Stone, Alec. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France: The Constitutional Council in Comparative Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Strauss, David A. “Constitutions, Written and Otherwise.” Law and Philosophy 19, no. 4 (2000): 451–64.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R.Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R. The Partial Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Sweet, Alec Stone. “Constitutional Politics in France and Germany.” In On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, edited by Shapiro, Martin and Sweet, Alec Stone, 184–208. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweet, Alec Stone. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweet, Alec Stone.“Path Dependence, Precedent, and Judicial Power.” In On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, edited by Shapiro, Martin and Sweet, Alec Stone, 113–35. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tate, Neal, and Vallinder, Thorsten, eds. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Thomas, George. “Recovering the Political Constitution: The Madisonian Vision.” The Review of Politics 66, no. 2 (2004): 233–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tribe, Lawrence H. “The Puzzling Persistence of Process-Based Constitutional Theories.” Yale Law Journal 89, no. 6 (1980): 1063–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tullis, Jeffrey K. “Deliberation between Institutions.” In Debating Deliberative Democracy, edited by Fishkin, James S. and Laslett, Peter, 200–11. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. “Forms of Judicial Review as Expressions of Constitutional Patriotism.” Law and Philosophy 22, no. 3–4 (2003): 353–79.Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution away from the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

United States v. Carolene Products Co., 304 U.S. 144 (1938).

Vacco v. Quill, 521 US 793 (1997).

Vieth et al. v. Jubelirer, 541 US 267 (2004).

Waldron, Jeremy. “A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13 (1993): 18–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Freeman's Defense of Judicial Review.” Law and Philosophy 13 (1994): 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (in Florida)?” Law and Philosophy 21 (2002): 137–64.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Judicial Review and the Conditions of Democracy.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 6, no. 4 (1998): 335–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. “Rights and Majorities: Rousseau Revisited.” In Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991, 392–421. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. The Dignity of Legislation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker, Neil. “The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism.” The Modern Law Review 65, no. 3 (2002): 317–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997).

Whittington, Keith E.Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Wolin, Sheldon S. “The Liberal/Democratic Divide: On Rawls's Political Liberalism.” Political Theory 24, no. 1 (1996): 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zurn, Christopher F. “Deliberative Democracy and Constitutional Review.” Law and Philosophy 21 (2002): 467–542.Google Scholar