Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T05:11:20.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2009

Sergio Tenenbaum
Sergio Tenenbaum
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Appearances of the Good
An Essay on the Nature of Practical Reason
 , pp. 299 - 308
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackrill, J. L. “Aristotle on Eudaimonia.” In Essays on Aristotle's Ethics, edited by Rorty, A., 15–34. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert. “Scanlon's Contractualism: Critical Notice of T. M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other.” Philosophical Review 110 (2001): 563–586.Google Scholar
Ainslie, Donald. “Character Traits and the Humean Approach to Ethics.” In New Essays in Moral Psychology, edited by Tenenbaum, Sergio. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2006.Google Scholar
The American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR (Text Revision). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2000.
Anderson, Elizabeth. Values in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M.Intention, 2nd ed. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1963 (1st ed., Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1957).Google Scholar
Aristotle. Nichomachean Ethics. Translated by Irwin, T.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1985.Google Scholar
Arpaly, Nomy. “On Acting Rationally Against One's Best Judgment.” Ethics 110, no. 3 (2000): 488–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arpaly, Nomy. Unprincipled Virtue. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. Practical Reasoning. New York: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. The Architecture of Reason: The Structure and Substance of Rationality. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Confessions. Oxford: Penguin Books, 1961.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon. “Practical Tortoise Raising.” Mind 104 (1995): 695–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, Robert. Making it Explicit. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. “Actions, Norms and Practical Reasoning.” In Varieties of Practical Reasoning, edited by Millgram, Elijah, 465–479. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard. A Theory of the Good and the Right. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael. “Practical Reasoning and Weakness of the Will.” Nous 13 (1979): 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael. Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael. Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael. “Davidson's Theory of Intention.” In Bratman, Faces of Intention, 209–224, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael. “Two Faces of Intention.” Philosophical Review 93 (1984): 375–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Talbot. “The Real Problem with Internalism about Reasons.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32, no. 4 (2003): 443–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Talbot. “Virtues We Can Share: Friendship and Aristotelian Ethical Theory.” Ethics 115 (2005): 721–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John. “Normative Requirements.” In Normativity, edited by Dancy, Jonathan, 78–99. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2000.Google Scholar
Broome, John. “Are Intentions Reasons? And How Should We Cope with Incommensurable Values?” In Practical Rationality and Preference: Essays for David Gauthier, edited by Morris, Christopher and Ripstein, Arthur, 98–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Buss, Sarah. “Appearing Respectful: The Moral Significance of Manners.” Ethics 109 (1999): 795–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Ruth. “Introduction.” In Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, edited by Chang, Ruth, 1–34. London: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Charlton, William. Weakness of Will. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Chekhov, Anton. Uncle Vanya, translated by Frayn, Michael. London: Methuen, 2005.Google Scholar
Clark, Philip. “Velleman's Autonomism.” Ethics 111 (2001): 580–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. “Facts and Principles.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (2003): 211–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. The Moonstone, edited by Sutherland, John, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Dahl, Norman O.Practical Reason, Aristotle, and Weakness of the Will. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. Moral Reasons. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell, 1993.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. Practical Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
D'Arms, Justin, and Dan Jacobson. “Anthropocentric Constraints in Human Value.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. 1, edited by Shafer-Landau, Russ. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen L.Impartial Reason. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.” In Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events, 3–20. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. “How Is Weakness of the Will Possible?” In Davidson, , Essays on Actions and Events, 21–42.CrossRef
Davidson, Donald. “Intending.” In Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events, 83–103.CrossRef
Davidson, Donald. “Mental Events.” In Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events, 265–283.CrossRef
Davidson, Donald. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” In Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 183–198. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartogh, Govert. “The Authority of Intention.” Ethics 115 (2004): 6–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, Rene. Meditations. In Descartes, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Dreier, James. “The Structure of Normative Theories.” The Monist 76 (1996): 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, Michael. “What Is a Theory of Meaning (II).” In Dummett, Seas of Language, 34–93. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. M. “Hard Cases.” In Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously, 81–130. London: Duckworth, 1977.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen. “Kant's Conception of Practical Wisdom.” Kant-Studien 88 (1997): 16–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Gareth. The Varieties of Reference, edited by McDowell, John. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa. “Utilitarianism and the Virtues.” Mind 94 (1985): 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Philippa. Natural Goodness. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Philippa. “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives.” In Foot, Virtues and Vices. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “Further Remarks on the Defence of Neuro-Psychoses.” In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 3, ed. and trans. by J. Strachey, 162–185. London: Hogarth Press, 1952.
Gauthier, David P.Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Gert, Joshua. Brute Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenspan, Patricia. “Conditional Oughts and Hypothetical Imperatives.” Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975): 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, James. Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Griffin, James. “Against the Taste Model.” In Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-being, edited by Elster, Jon, Hernes, Gudmund, and Roemer, John E., 45–69. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, Jean. “On Instrumental Rationality.” In Reason, Ethics and Society, edited by Schneewind, J. B., 84–116. Chicago: Open Court, 1996.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. The Authority of Reason, edited by Healey, Richard. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, John. “Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, edited by Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard, 39–53. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugeland, John. Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel. “The Impossibility of Interpersonal Utility Comparisons.” Mind 104 (1995): 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Joseph. “Foundationalism and Practical Reason.” Mind 106, no. 423 (1997): 451–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heil, John. “Minds Divided.” Mind 98 (1989): 571–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Barbara. “Leaving Deontology Behind.” In Herman, The Practice of Moral Judgment, 208–242. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, edited by Macpherson, C. B.. London: Penguin Books, 1985.Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer. Simple Mindedness: In Defense of Naive Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Hubin, Donald C. “What's Special about Humeanism.” Nous 33 (1999): 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by Norton, David. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas. “Virtuous Acts and Virtuous Dispositions.” Analysis 66 (2006): 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections: With Illustrations upon the Moral Sense, edited by Garrett, Aaron. New York: Liberty Fund, 2002.Google Scholar
Jakes, Ian. Theoretical Approaches to Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. “Does Consequentialism Demand Too Much?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (1984): 239–254.Google Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. The Limits of Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamm, Frances. “Toward the Essence of Nonconsequentialism.” In Fact and Value: Essays on Ethics and Metaphysics for Judith Jarvis Thomson, edited by Byrne, Alex, Stalnaker, Robert, and Wedgwood, Ralph. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, edited by Greene, Theodore Meyer and Hudson, Hoyt H.. 1st Harper Torchbook ed. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1960.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Metaphysics of Morals, edited by Gregor, Mary. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason, edited by Gregor, Mary. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Niko. “Why Be Rational?” Mind 114 (2005): 509–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. “Kant's Formula of Humanity.” In Korsgaard, Creating the Kingdom of Ends, 106–132. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. “Two Distinctions of Goodness.” In Korsgaard, Creating the Kingdom of Ends, 249–274.CrossRef
Korsgaard, Christine M.The Sources of Normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. “The Normativity of Instrumental Reason.” In Ethics and Practical Reason, edited by Cullity, Garett and Gaut, Berys Nigel, 215–254. New York: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. Locke Lectures, http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/∼korsgaar/, 2002.
Lavin, Douglas. “Practical Reason and the Possibility of Error.” Ethics 114 (2004): 424–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. “Desire as Belief.” Mind 97 (1988): 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L.Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin Books, 1977.Google Scholar
MacMahon, Christopher. “The Paradox of Deontology.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (1991): 350–377.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. “Comments on ‘Some Aspects of Rational Aspects of Incontinence’ by T. H. Irwin.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 27 (supp.) (1988): 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John. Mind and World. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. “Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space.” In McDowell, , Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, 228–259. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. “Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?” In McDowell, , Mind, Value and Reality, 77–94. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. “Might There Be External Reasons?” In McDowell, , Mind, Value and Reality, 95–111.
McDowell, John. “Values and Secondary Qualities.” In McDowell, , Mind, Value and Reality, 131–150.
McDowell, John. “Functionalism and Anomalous Monism.” In McDowell, , Mind, Value and Reality, 325–340.
Mele, Al. “Pears on Akrasia and Defeated Intentions.” Philosophia 14 (1984): 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Al. “Is Akratic Action Unfree?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (1986): 673–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Al. Irrationality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Mele, Al. Self-Deception Unmasked. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Mele, Al. “Akratics and Addicts.” American Philosophical Quarterly 39, no. 2 (2002): 153.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S.Utilitarianism. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1981.Google Scholar
Millgram, Elijah. Practical Induction. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Misak, Cheryl. Truth and the End of Inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E.Principia Ethica. Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1988.Google Scholar
Nagel, Jennifer. “The Empiricist Conception of Experience.” Philosophy 75 (2000): 345–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. The Possibility of Altruism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. The Nature of Rationality. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Pears, David. “How Easy Is Akrasia?” Philosophia 11 (1982): 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. “Consequentialism and Respect for Person.” Ethics 100 (1989): 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip, and Smith, Michael. “Backgrounding Desire.” Philosophical Review 99 (1990): 565–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato. “Protagoras.” In The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Including the Letters, edited by Cairns, Huntington and Hamilton, Edith, translated by W. K. C. Guthrie. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Quinn, Warren. “Actions, Intentions and Consequences: The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing.” In Morality and Action, edited by Foot, Philippa, 149–174. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Quinn, Warren. “Actions, Intentions and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect.” In Foot, , Morality and Action, 175–193.
Quinn, Warren. “Putting Rationality in Its Place.” In Foot, , Morality and Action, 228–271.
Railton, Peter. “Moral Realism.” Philosophical Review 95 (1986): 163–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railton, Peter. “Naturalism and Prescriptivity.” In Foundations of Moral and Political Philosophy, edited by Miller, Fred D. and Paul, Jeffrey. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
Railton, Peter. “On the Hypothetical and Non-Hypothetical in Reasoning about Belief and Action.” In Ethics and Practical Reason, edited by Cullity, Garrett and Gaut, Berys Nigel, 53–80. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Railton, Peter. “Taste and Value.” In Well-Being and Morality: Essays in Honour of James Griffin, edited by Crisp, Roger and Hooker, Brad, 53–74. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Rappoport, J. L. “The Biology of Obsessions and Compulsions.” Scientific American 260, June (1989): 11–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. “Two Concepts of Rules.” In Rawls, Collected Papers, edited by Freeman, Samuel, 20–46. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.” In Rawls, , Collected Papers, 303–358.
Raz, Joseph. “The Moral Point of View.” In Reason, Ethics and Society, edited by Schneewind, J. B., 70–83. Chicago: Open Court, 1996.Google Scholar
Regan, Don. “Why Am I My Brother's Keeper?” In Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz, edited by Wallace, Jay, Pettit, Philip, Scheffler, Samuel, and Smith, Michael. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Regan, Donald H. “The Value of Rational Nature.” Ethics 112, no. 2 (2002): 267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosati, Connie. “Internalism and the Good for a Person.” Ethics 106, no. 2 (1996): 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salkovskis, Paul M. “Psychological Approaches to the Understanding of Obsessional Problems.” In Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: Theory, Research, and Treatment, edited by Swinson, Richard P., Anthony, Martin M., Rechman, S., and Richer, Margaret A., 33–41. New York: Guilford Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey. “The Metaethical Problem.” Ethics 108 (1997): 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Schapiro, Tamar. “Three Conceptions of Action in Moral Theory.” Nous 35, no. 1 (2001): 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. The Rejection of Consequentialism: A Philosophical Investigation of the Considerations Underlying Rival Moral Conceptions, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Mark. “The Scope of Instrumental Reason.” Philosophical Perspectives 18 (2004): 337–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Mark. “Teleology, Agent-Relative Value, and ‘Good,’ ” unpublished manuscript.
Schueler, G. F.Desire: Its Role in Practical Reason and the Explanation of Action. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Schueler, G. F. “How Can Reason Be Practical?” Critica 28, no. 84 (2000): 41–62.Google Scholar
Schueler, G. F.Reasons and Purposes: Human Rationality and the Teleological Explanation of Action. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. “Some Reflections on Language Games.” In Sellars, , Science, Perception and Reality, 321–358. Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. Utilitarianism: For and Against, edited by Owen, Bernard Arthur, Williams, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael. The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael. “In Defense of The Moral Problem: A Reply to Brink, Copp, and Sayre-McCord.” Ethics 108, no. 1 (1997): 84–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, David. “On the Subjectivity of Welfare.” Ethics 107 (1997): 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stampe, Dennis. “The Authority of Desire.” Philosophical Review 96 (1987): 335–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Dan, and Eric, Hollander. “A Neural Network Approach to Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder.” Journal of Mind and Behaviour 15, no. 3 (1994): 223–238.Google Scholar
Stocker, Michael. “Desiring the Bad: An Essay in Moral Psychology.” Journal of Philosophy 76 (1979): 738–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, L. W.Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, David. “The Authority of Humanity.” Ethics 113, no. 2 (2003): 350–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, Christine. “Profiles of the Virtues.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1995): 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio. “Realists without a Cause: Deflationary Theories of Truth and Ethical Realism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26, no. 4 (1996): 561–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio. “The Judgment of a Weak Will.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49, no. 4 (1999): 875–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio. “Ethical Internalism and Glaucon's Question.” Nous 34 (2000): 108–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio. “Speculative Mistakes and Ordinary Temptations: Kant on Instrumentalist Conceptions of Practical Reason.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 20, no. 2 (2003): 203–223.Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio. “Accidie, Evaluation, and Motivation.” In Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality, edited by Stroud, Sarah, 147–171. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio. “Direction of Fit and Motivational Cognitivism.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. 1, edited by Shafer-Landau, Russ. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio. “The Conclusion of Practical Reason.” In New Essays on Moral Psychology, edited by Tenenbaum, Sergio. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2006.Google Scholar
Thalberg, Irving. “Questions about Motivational Strength.” In Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, edited by LePore, Ernest and McLaughlin, Brian P.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael. “Naïve Action Theory,” unpublished manuscript.
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. The Realm of Rights. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Fraassen, Bas C.The Scientific Image. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, David. “Brandt's Definition of ‘Good’.” Philosophical Review, 97 (1988): 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, David. “The Guise of the Good.” In Velleman, The Possibility of Practical Reason, 92–122. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Velleman, David. “What Happens When Someone Acts?” In Velleman, The Possibility of Practical Reason, 123–143. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Velleman, David. “The Possibility of Practical Reason.” In Velleman, The Possibility of Practical Reason, 170–199.
Vogler, Candace A.Reasonably Vicious. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Wallace, Jay. “Explanation, Deliberation, and Reasons.” In Wallace, Normativity and the Will, 63–70. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Wallace, Jay. “Normativity, Commitment, and Instrumental Reason.” In Wallace, Normativity and the Will, 82–120.
Watson, Gary. “Free Agency.” Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975): 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Gary. “Skepticism about Weakness of Will.” Philosophical Review 86 (1977): 316–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Gary. “Free Action and Free Will.” Mind 96 (1987): 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph. “The Aim of Belief.” Philosophical Perspectives 16 (2002): 267–297.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. “Internal and External Reasons.” In Williams, Moral Luck, 101–113. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana Press/Collins, 1985.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. “The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick and the Ambitions of Ethics.” In Williams, Making Sense of Humanity and Other Philosophical Papers, 1982–1993, 153–171. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. “Acting as the Virtuous Person Acts.” In Aristotle and Moral Realism, edited by Heinaman, Robert. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. Knowledge and Its Limits. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan. “Moral Saints.” Journal of Philosophy 79 (1982): 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollheim, Richard. “Desire, Belief and Professor Grünbaum's Freud.” In The Mind and Its Depths. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Yaqūb, Aladdin. The Liar Speaks the Truth: A Defense of the Revision Theory of Truth. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Zangwill, Nick. “Direction of Fit and Normative Functionalism.” Philosophical Studies 91, no. 2 (1998): 173–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackrill, J. L. “Aristotle on Eudaimonia.” In Essays on Aristotle's Ethics, edited by Rorty, A., 15–34. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert. “Scanlon's Contractualism: Critical Notice of T. M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other.” Philosophical Review 110 (2001): 563–586.Google Scholar
Ainslie, Donald. “Character Traits and the Humean Approach to Ethics.” In New Essays in Moral Psychology, edited by Tenenbaum, Sergio. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2006.Google Scholar
The American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR (Text Revision). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2000.
Anderson, Elizabeth. Values in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M.Intention, 2nd ed. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1963 (1st ed., Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1957).Google Scholar
Aristotle. Nichomachean Ethics. Translated by Irwin, T.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1985.Google Scholar
Arpaly, Nomy. “On Acting Rationally Against One's Best Judgment.” Ethics 110, no. 3 (2000): 488–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arpaly, Nomy. Unprincipled Virtue. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. Practical Reasoning. New York: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. The Architecture of Reason: The Structure and Substance of Rationality. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Confessions. Oxford: Penguin Books, 1961.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon. “Practical Tortoise Raising.” Mind 104 (1995): 695–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandom, Robert. Making it Explicit. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. “Actions, Norms and Practical Reasoning.” In Varieties of Practical Reasoning, edited by Millgram, Elijah, 465–479. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard. A Theory of the Good and the Right. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael. “Practical Reasoning and Weakness of the Will.” Nous 13 (1979): 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael. Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael. Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael. “Davidson's Theory of Intention.” In Bratman, Faces of Intention, 209–224, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael. “Two Faces of Intention.” Philosophical Review 93 (1984): 375–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Talbot. “The Real Problem with Internalism about Reasons.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32, no. 4 (2003): 443–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Talbot. “Virtues We Can Share: Friendship and Aristotelian Ethical Theory.” Ethics 115 (2005): 721–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John. “Normative Requirements.” In Normativity, edited by Dancy, Jonathan, 78–99. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2000.Google Scholar
Broome, John. “Are Intentions Reasons? And How Should We Cope with Incommensurable Values?” In Practical Rationality and Preference: Essays for David Gauthier, edited by Morris, Christopher and Ripstein, Arthur, 98–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Buss, Sarah. “Appearing Respectful: The Moral Significance of Manners.” Ethics 109 (1999): 795–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Ruth. “Introduction.” In Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, edited by Chang, Ruth, 1–34. London: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Charlton, William. Weakness of Will. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Chekhov, Anton. Uncle Vanya, translated by Frayn, Michael. London: Methuen, 2005.Google Scholar
Clark, Philip. “Velleman's Autonomism.” Ethics 111 (2001): 580–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. “Facts and Principles.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (2003): 211–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Wilkie. The Moonstone, edited by Sutherland, John, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Dahl, Norman O.Practical Reason, Aristotle, and Weakness of the Will. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. Moral Reasons. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell, 1993.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. Practical Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
D'Arms, Justin, and Dan Jacobson. “Anthropocentric Constraints in Human Value.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. 1, edited by Shafer-Landau, Russ. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen L.Impartial Reason. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.” In Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events, 3–20. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. “How Is Weakness of the Will Possible?” In Davidson, , Essays on Actions and Events, 21–42.CrossRef
Davidson, Donald. “Intending.” In Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events, 83–103.CrossRef
Davidson, Donald. “Mental Events.” In Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events, 265–283.CrossRef
Davidson, Donald. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” In Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 183–198. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartogh, Govert. “The Authority of Intention.” Ethics 115 (2004): 6–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, Rene. Meditations. In Descartes, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Dreier, James. “The Structure of Normative Theories.” The Monist 76 (1996): 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, Michael. “What Is a Theory of Meaning (II).” In Dummett, Seas of Language, 34–93. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. M. “Hard Cases.” In Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously, 81–130. London: Duckworth, 1977.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen. “Kant's Conception of Practical Wisdom.” Kant-Studien 88 (1997): 16–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Gareth. The Varieties of Reference, edited by McDowell, John. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa. “Utilitarianism and the Virtues.” Mind 94 (1985): 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Philippa. Natural Goodness. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Philippa. “Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives.” In Foot, Virtues and Vices. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “Further Remarks on the Defence of Neuro-Psychoses.” In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 3, ed. and trans. by J. Strachey, 162–185. London: Hogarth Press, 1952.
Gauthier, David P.Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Gert, Joshua. Brute Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenspan, Patricia. “Conditional Oughts and Hypothetical Imperatives.” Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975): 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, James. Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Griffin, James. “Against the Taste Model.” In Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-being, edited by Elster, Jon, Hernes, Gudmund, and Roemer, John E., 45–69. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, Jean. “On Instrumental Rationality.” In Reason, Ethics and Society, edited by Schneewind, J. B., 84–116. Chicago: Open Court, 1996.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. The Authority of Reason, edited by Healey, Richard. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, John. “Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, edited by Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard, 39–53. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugeland, John. Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel. “The Impossibility of Interpersonal Utility Comparisons.” Mind 104 (1995): 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Joseph. “Foundationalism and Practical Reason.” Mind 106, no. 423 (1997): 451–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heil, John. “Minds Divided.” Mind 98 (1989): 571–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Barbara. “Leaving Deontology Behind.” In Herman, The Practice of Moral Judgment, 208–242. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, edited by Macpherson, C. B.. London: Penguin Books, 1985.Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer. Simple Mindedness: In Defense of Naive Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Hubin, Donald C. “What's Special about Humeanism.” Nous 33 (1999): 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by Norton, David. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hurka, Thomas. “Virtuous Acts and Virtuous Dispositions.” Analysis 66 (2006): 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections: With Illustrations upon the Moral Sense, edited by Garrett, Aaron. New York: Liberty Fund, 2002.Google Scholar
Jakes, Ian. Theoretical Approaches to Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. “Does Consequentialism Demand Too Much?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (1984): 239–254.Google Scholar
Kagan, Shelly. The Limits of Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamm, Frances. “Toward the Essence of Nonconsequentialism.” In Fact and Value: Essays on Ethics and Metaphysics for Judith Jarvis Thomson, edited by Byrne, Alex, Stalnaker, Robert, and Wedgwood, Ralph. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, edited by Greene, Theodore Meyer and Hudson, Hoyt H.. 1st Harper Torchbook ed. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1960.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. The Metaphysics of Morals, edited by Gregor, Mary. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason, edited by Gregor, Mary. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Niko. “Why Be Rational?” Mind 114 (2005): 509–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. “Kant's Formula of Humanity.” In Korsgaard, Creating the Kingdom of Ends, 106–132. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. “Two Distinctions of Goodness.” In Korsgaard, Creating the Kingdom of Ends, 249–274.CrossRef
Korsgaard, Christine M.The Sources of Normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. “The Normativity of Instrumental Reason.” In Ethics and Practical Reason, edited by Cullity, Garett and Gaut, Berys Nigel, 215–254. New York: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. Locke Lectures, http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/∼korsgaar/, 2002.
Lavin, Douglas. “Practical Reason and the Possibility of Error.” Ethics 114 (2004): 424–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. “Desire as Belief.” Mind 97 (1988): 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L.Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin Books, 1977.Google Scholar
MacMahon, Christopher. “The Paradox of Deontology.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (1991): 350–377.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. “Comments on ‘Some Aspects of Rational Aspects of Incontinence’ by T. H. Irwin.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 27 (supp.) (1988): 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John. Mind and World. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. “Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space.” In McDowell, , Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, 228–259. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. “Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?” In McDowell, , Mind, Value and Reality, 77–94. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. “Might There Be External Reasons?” In McDowell, , Mind, Value and Reality, 95–111.
McDowell, John. “Values and Secondary Qualities.” In McDowell, , Mind, Value and Reality, 131–150.
McDowell, John. “Functionalism and Anomalous Monism.” In McDowell, , Mind, Value and Reality, 325–340.
Mele, Al. “Pears on Akrasia and Defeated Intentions.” Philosophia 14 (1984): 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Al. “Is Akratic Action Unfree?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (1986): 673–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Al. Irrationality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Mele, Al. Self-Deception Unmasked. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Mele, Al. “Akratics and Addicts.” American Philosophical Quarterly 39, no. 2 (2002): 153.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S.Utilitarianism. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1981.Google Scholar
Millgram, Elijah. Practical Induction. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Misak, Cheryl. Truth and the End of Inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E.Principia Ethica. Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1988.Google Scholar
Nagel, Jennifer. “The Empiricist Conception of Experience.” Philosophy 75 (2000): 345–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. The Possibility of Altruism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. The Nature of Rationality. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Pears, David. “How Easy Is Akrasia?” Philosophia 11 (1982): 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. “Consequentialism and Respect for Person.” Ethics 100 (1989): 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip, and Smith, Michael. “Backgrounding Desire.” Philosophical Review 99 (1990): 565–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato. “Protagoras.” In The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Including the Letters, edited by Cairns, Huntington and Hamilton, Edith, translated by W. K. C. Guthrie. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Quinn, Warren. “Actions, Intentions and Consequences: The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing.” In Morality and Action, edited by Foot, Philippa, 149–174. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Quinn, Warren. “Actions, Intentions and Consequences: The Doctrine of Double Effect.” In Foot, , Morality and Action, 175–193.
Quinn, Warren. “Putting Rationality in Its Place.” In Foot, , Morality and Action, 228–271.
Railton, Peter. “Moral Realism.” Philosophical Review 95 (1986): 163–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railton, Peter. “Naturalism and Prescriptivity.” In Foundations of Moral and Political Philosophy, edited by Miller, Fred D. and Paul, Jeffrey. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
Railton, Peter. “On the Hypothetical and Non-Hypothetical in Reasoning about Belief and Action.” In Ethics and Practical Reason, edited by Cullity, Garrett and Gaut, Berys Nigel, 53–80. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Railton, Peter. “Taste and Value.” In Well-Being and Morality: Essays in Honour of James Griffin, edited by Crisp, Roger and Hooker, Brad, 53–74. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Rappoport, J. L. “The Biology of Obsessions and Compulsions.” Scientific American 260, June (1989): 11–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. “Two Concepts of Rules.” In Rawls, Collected Papers, edited by Freeman, Samuel, 20–46. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.” In Rawls, , Collected Papers, 303–358.
Raz, Joseph. “The Moral Point of View.” In Reason, Ethics and Society, edited by Schneewind, J. B., 70–83. Chicago: Open Court, 1996.Google Scholar
Regan, Don. “Why Am I My Brother's Keeper?” In Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz, edited by Wallace, Jay, Pettit, Philip, Scheffler, Samuel, and Smith, Michael. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Regan, Donald H. “The Value of Rational Nature.” Ethics 112, no. 2 (2002): 267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosati, Connie. “Internalism and the Good for a Person.” Ethics 106, no. 2 (1996): 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salkovskis, Paul M. “Psychological Approaches to the Understanding of Obsessional Problems.” In Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: Theory, Research, and Treatment, edited by Swinson, Richard P., Anthony, Martin M., Rechman, S., and Richer, Margaret A., 33–41. New York: Guilford Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey. “The Metaethical Problem.” Ethics 108 (1997): 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Schapiro, Tamar. “Three Conceptions of Action in Moral Theory.” Nous 35, no. 1 (2001): 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. The Rejection of Consequentialism: A Philosophical Investigation of the Considerations Underlying Rival Moral Conceptions, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Mark. “The Scope of Instrumental Reason.” Philosophical Perspectives 18 (2004): 337–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Mark. “Teleology, Agent-Relative Value, and ‘Good,’ ” unpublished manuscript.
Schueler, G. F.Desire: Its Role in Practical Reason and the Explanation of Action. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Schueler, G. F. “How Can Reason Be Practical?” Critica 28, no. 84 (2000): 41–62.Google Scholar
Schueler, G. F.Reasons and Purposes: Human Rationality and the Teleological Explanation of Action. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. “Some Reflections on Language Games.” In Sellars, , Science, Perception and Reality, 321–358. Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. Utilitarianism: For and Against, edited by Owen, Bernard Arthur, Williams, . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael. The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael. “In Defense of The Moral Problem: A Reply to Brink, Copp, and Sayre-McCord.” Ethics 108, no. 1 (1997): 84–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, David. “On the Subjectivity of Welfare.” Ethics 107 (1997): 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stampe, Dennis. “The Authority of Desire.” Philosophical Review 96 (1987): 335–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Dan, and Eric, Hollander. “A Neural Network Approach to Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder.” Journal of Mind and Behaviour 15, no. 3 (1994): 223–238.Google Scholar
Stocker, Michael. “Desiring the Bad: An Essay in Moral Psychology.” Journal of Philosophy 76 (1979): 738–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, L. W.Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, David. “The Authority of Humanity.” Ethics 113, no. 2 (2003): 350–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, Christine. “Profiles of the Virtues.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1995): 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio. “Realists without a Cause: Deflationary Theories of Truth and Ethical Realism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26, no. 4 (1996): 561–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio. “The Judgment of a Weak Will.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49, no. 4 (1999): 875–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio. “Ethical Internalism and Glaucon's Question.” Nous 34 (2000): 108–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio. “Speculative Mistakes and Ordinary Temptations: Kant on Instrumentalist Conceptions of Practical Reason.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 20, no. 2 (2003): 203–223.Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio. “Accidie, Evaluation, and Motivation.” In Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality, edited by Stroud, Sarah, 147–171. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio. “Direction of Fit and Motivational Cognitivism.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. 1, edited by Shafer-Landau, Russ. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, Sergio. “The Conclusion of Practical Reason.” In New Essays on Moral Psychology, edited by Tenenbaum, Sergio. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2006.Google Scholar
Thalberg, Irving. “Questions about Motivational Strength.” In Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, edited by LePore, Ernest and McLaughlin, Brian P.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael. “Naïve Action Theory,” unpublished manuscript.
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. The Realm of Rights. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Fraassen, Bas C.The Scientific Image. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, David. “Brandt's Definition of ‘Good’.” Philosophical Review, 97 (1988): 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, David. “The Guise of the Good.” In Velleman, The Possibility of Practical Reason, 92–122. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Velleman, David. “What Happens When Someone Acts?” In Velleman, The Possibility of Practical Reason, 123–143. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Velleman, David. “The Possibility of Practical Reason.” In Velleman, The Possibility of Practical Reason, 170–199.
Vogler, Candace A.Reasonably Vicious. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Wallace, Jay. “Explanation, Deliberation, and Reasons.” In Wallace, Normativity and the Will, 63–70. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Wallace, Jay. “Normativity, Commitment, and Instrumental Reason.” In Wallace, Normativity and the Will, 82–120.
Watson, Gary. “Free Agency.” Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975): 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Gary. “Skepticism about Weakness of Will.” Philosophical Review 86 (1977): 316–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Gary. “Free Action and Free Will.” Mind 96 (1987): 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph. “The Aim of Belief.” Philosophical Perspectives 16 (2002): 267–297.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. “Internal and External Reasons.” In Williams, Moral Luck, 101–113. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana Press/Collins, 1985.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. “The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick and the Ambitions of Ethics.” In Williams, Making Sense of Humanity and Other Philosophical Papers, 1982–1993, 153–171. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. “Acting as the Virtuous Person Acts.” In Aristotle and Moral Realism, edited by Heinaman, Robert. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. Knowledge and Its Limits. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan. “Moral Saints.” Journal of Philosophy 79 (1982): 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollheim, Richard. “Desire, Belief and Professor Grünbaum's Freud.” In The Mind and Its Depths. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Yaqūb, Aladdin. The Liar Speaks the Truth: A Defense of the Revision Theory of Truth. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Zangwill, Nick. “Direction of Fit and Normative Functionalism.” Philosophical Studies 91, no. 2 (1998): 173–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Sergio Tenenbaum, University of Toronto
  • Book: Appearances of the Good
  • Online publication: 25 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498855.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Sergio Tenenbaum, University of Toronto
  • Book: Appearances of the Good
  • Online publication: 25 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498855.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Sergio Tenenbaum, University of Toronto
  • Book: Appearances of the Good
  • Online publication: 25 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498855.011
Available formats
×