Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- 1 Introduction to Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking
- 2 Object Concepts and Action
- 3 Constraints on Spatial Language Comprehension: Function and Geometry
- 4 Embodiment in Metaphorical Imagination
- 5 Passionate Thoughts: The Emotional Embodiment of Moral Concepts
- 6 Grounding Language in Bodily States: The Case for Emotion
- 7 Situating Abstract Concepts
- 8 Dynamicity, Fictivity, and Scanning: The Imaginative Basis of Logic and Linguistic Meaning
- 9 The Emergence of Grammar from Perspective
- 10 Embodied Sentence Comprehension
- 11 On the Perceptual-Motor and Image-Schematic Infrastructure of Language
- 12 Connecting Concepts to Each Other and the World
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
8 - Dynamicity, Fictivity, and Scanning: The Imaginative Basis of Logic and Linguistic Meaning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 July 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- 1 Introduction to Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking
- 2 Object Concepts and Action
- 3 Constraints on Spatial Language Comprehension: Function and Geometry
- 4 Embodiment in Metaphorical Imagination
- 5 Passionate Thoughts: The Emotional Embodiment of Moral Concepts
- 6 Grounding Language in Bodily States: The Case for Emotion
- 7 Situating Abstract Concepts
- 8 Dynamicity, Fictivity, and Scanning: The Imaginative Basis of Logic and Linguistic Meaning
- 9 The Emergence of Grammar from Perspective
- 10 Embodied Sentence Comprehension
- 11 On the Perceptual-Motor and Image-Schematic Infrastructure of Language
- 12 Connecting Concepts to Each Other and the World
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
COGNITIVE SEMANTICS
The last quarter century has seen the emergence of what has come to be known as cognitive semantics. This collective endeavor has vastly expanded and profoundly altered our view of both meaning and its relation to grammar. It offers new solutions to classic problems. More fundamentally, it reshapes the entire conceptual landscape within which the problems themselves are posed and formulated.
The most basic development is simply the unequivocal identification of meaning with conceptualization, i.e., the cognitive activity constituting our apprehension of the world (Langacker, 1987a, 2000; Talmy, 2000a, 2000b). Since the mind is part of the loop, linguistic semantics does not just reflect the external situations described, but inescapably incorporates particular ways of construing those situations and portraying them for linguistic purposes. It thus involves the full range of our mental capacities, as well as the elaborate conceptual structures we construct and manipulate. Included – being absolutely fundamental to cognition and language – are capacities reasonably called imaginative: metaphor (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980, 1999), metonymy (Kövecses & Radden, 1998), fictivity (Matsumoto, 1996a, 1996b; Talmy, 1996; Langacker, 1999b), mental space construction (Fauconnier, 1985; Fauconnier & Sweetser, 1996), and conceptual blending (Fauconnier, 1997; Fauconnier & Turner, 1998a, 1998b, 2002). These capacities are however grounded in everyday bodily experience: motion, perception, muscular exertion, etc. Basic experience of this sort is projected metaphorically onto other domains, and in abstracted form provides the skeletal organization of conceptual structure in general. This of course is embodiment (Johnson, 1987; Lakoff, 1987).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Grounding CognitionThe Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking, pp. 164 - 197Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
References
, & (1997). Then in conditional constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 8, 109–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press/Bradford
Fauconnier, G. (1996). Analogical counterfactuals. In G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser, Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar (pp. 57–90). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Fauconnier, G., & Sweetser, E. (Eds.), (1996). Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998b). Principles of conceptual integration. In J. P. Koenig (Ed.), Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar (pp. 269–283). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books
Goldberg, A. E. (Ed.), (1996). Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Koenig, J. P. (Ed.), (1998). Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press
, & . (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9, 33–77Google Scholar
Kumashiro, T. (2000). The Conceptual Basis of Grammar: A Cognitive Approach to Japanese Clausal Structure. San Diego: University of California doctoral dissertation
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press
. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas?Cognitive Linguistics 1, 39–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (1998). Conceptual metaphor in mathematics. In J. P. Koenig (Ed.), Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar (pp. 219–237). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books
(1986). Abstract motion. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 12, 455–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987a). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press
Langacker, R. W. (1990). Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1, 5–38
Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press
Langacker, R. W. (1995). Possession and possessive constructions. In J. R. Taylor and R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World (pp. 51–79). Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 82. Berlin and New York: Mouton de GruyterCrossRef
Langacker, R. W. (1996a). Conceptual grouping and pronominal anaphora. In B. Fox (Ed.), Studies in Anaphora (pp. 333–378). Typological Studies in Language 33. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Langacker, R. W. (1996b). A constraint on progressive generics. In Goldberg, A. E. (Ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language (pp. 289–302). Stanford: CSLI Publications
Langacker, R. W. (1997a). A dynamic account of grammatical function. In J. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type Dedicated to T. Givón (pp. 249–273). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Langacker, R. W. (1997b). Generics and habituals. In A. Athanasiadou and R. Dirven (Eds.), On Conditionals Again (pp. 191–222). Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 143. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Langacker, R. W. (1999a). Grammar and Conceptualization. Cognitive Linguistics Research 14. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter
Langacker, R. W. (1999c). Double-subject constructions. In Sung-Yun Bak (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm 4 (pp. 83–104). Seoul: Hanshin
Langacker, R. W. (1999d). Assessing the cognitive linguistic enterprise. In T. Janssen and G. Redeker (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology (pp. 13–59). Cognitive Linguistics Research 15. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter
Langacker, R. W. (1999e). Losing control: Grammaticization, subjectification, and transparency. In A. Blank and P. Koch (Eds.), Historical Semantics and Cognition (pp. 147–175). Cognitive Linguistics Research 13. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter
Langacker, R. W. (2000). Why a mind is necessary: Conceptualization, grammar and linguistic semantics. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Meaning and Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Approach (pp. 25–38). Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 2. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John BenjaminsCrossRef
Langacker, R. W. (2001b). Topic, subject, and possessor. In H. G. Simonsen and R. T. Endresen (Eds.), A Cognitive Approach to the Verb: Morphological and Constructional Perspectives (pp. 11–48). Cognitive Linguistics Research 16. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter
(2003). Dynamicity, fictivity, and scanning: The imaginative basis of logic and linguistic meaning. Korean Linguistics 18, 1–64Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (1996a). How abstract is subjective motion? A comparison of coverage path expressions and access path expressions. In Goldberg, A. E. (Ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. (pp. 359–373). Stanford: CSLI Publications
Matsumoto, Y. (1996b). Subjective-change expressions in Japanese and their cognitive and linguistic bases. In G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar (pp. 124–156). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press
(1991). Temporal priority and pragmatic ambiguity: The case of already. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 17, 426–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). “Continuity” within three scalar models: The polysemy of adverbial still. Journal of Semantics 10, 193–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, L. A. (1996). Cross-world continuity and the polysemy of adverbial still. In G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar (pp. 179–226). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press
(1982). Root and epistemic modals: Causality in two worlds. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 8, 484–507Google Scholar
Sweetser, E. (1996). Mental spaces and the grammar of conditional constructions. In G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar (pp. 318–333). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press
Sweetser, E. (1997). Role and individual interpretations of change predicates. In J. Nuyts and E. Pederson (Eds.), Language and Conceptualization (pp. 116–136). Language, Culture and Cognition 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
(1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12, 49–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1996). Fictive motion in language and “ception.” In P. Bloom et al. (Eds.), Language and Space (pp. 211–276). Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press/Bradford
Talmy, L. (2000a). Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 1, Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford
Talmy, L. (2000b). Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 2, Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
(1995). Conceptual reference points: A cognitive grammar account of pronominal anaphora constraints. Language 71, 310–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Hoek, K. (1997). Anaphora and Conceptual Structure. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press
- 26
- Cited by