Abbott, W. C.The Writings and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell. 4 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1937–47.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Aeschines, trans. Carey, Chris. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2000.

Amar, Akhil Reed. “Philadelphia Revisited: Amending the Constitution Outside Article V.” 55 University of Chicago Law Review1043 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. “Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Amendment.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antiphon and Andocides, trans. Gagarin, Michael and MacDowell, Douglas M.. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1998.

Aquinas, Saint Thomas. Treatise on Law, trans. Richard J. Regan. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2000.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Rhetoric, trans. W. Rhys Roberts. In Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 2, ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Aristotle. The Politics and the Constitution of Athens, ed. Everson, Steven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . The Nicomachean Ethics, trans. David Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Politics, trans. Ernest Barker. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Bacon, Sir Francis. The Essayes or Counsels, Civill and Morall, ed. Kiernan, Michael. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Barber, Sotirios A.On What the Constitution Means. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Barber, Sotirios A., and George, Robert P.. Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Benda, Ernst. “The Protection of Human Dignity (Article 1 of the Basic Law).” 53 SMU Law Review443–53 (1999).Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy. Rights, Representation, and Reform, ed. Schofield, P., Pease-Watkins, C., and Blamires, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Richard B. with Agel, Jerome. Amending America: If We Love the Constitution So Much, Why Do We Keep Trying to Change It? Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2000.Google Scholar

Boardman, Roger Sherman. Roger Sherman: Statesman and Signer. New York: Da Capo Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Bork, Robert H.The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law. New York: Free Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Brandon, Mark E. “The ‘Original’ Thirteenth Amendment and the Limits to Formal Constitutional Change.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brecht, Arnold. Federalism and Regionalism in Germany: The Division of Prussia. New York: Oxford University Press, 1945.Google Scholar

Burgess, Glenn. The Politics of the Ancient Constitution. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burns, J. H., ed., with Goldie, Mark. The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Caldwell, Peter C.Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law: The Theory and Practice of Weimar Constitutionalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Cicero. On the Commonwealth and On the Laws, ed. Zetzel, James E. G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean L., and Arato, Andrew. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Coke, Sir Edward. The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, or, A Commentary upon Littleton. Union, NJ: Lawbook Exchange, 1999.Google Scholar

Coke, Sir Edward. La Sept Part Des Reports Sr. Edw. Coke Chiualer, Chief Justice del Common Banke, 1608.

Collier, Christopher. Roger Sherman's Connecticut: Yankee Politics and the American Revolution. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Cooley, Thomas M. “The Power to Amend the Federal Constitution.” 4 Michigan Law Journal117 (1893).Google Scholar

Cotterell, Mary. “Interregnum Law Reform: The Hale Commission of 1652.” 83 English Historical Review689–704 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Currie, David. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Da Silva, Virgílio Afonso. “A Fossilized Constitution,” 17(4) Ratio Juris454–73 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demosthenes, . Against Meidias, Androtion, Aristocrates, Timocrates, Aristogeiton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1935.Google Scholar

Dodd, Walter. Revision and Amendment of State Constitutions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1910.Google Scholar

Dow, David R. “The Plain Meaning of Article V.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. “Equality, Democracy and Constitution: We the People in Court.” 28 Alberta Law Review (1990).Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Freedom's Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David. Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Eberle, Edward J. “Human Dignity, Privacy, and Personality in German and American Constitutional Law.” Utah Law Review963 (1997).Google Scholar

Eisgruber, Christopher. Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Elliot, Jonathan, ed. The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution as Recommended by the General Convention at Philadelphia in 1787. … 4 vols., 2nd ed. Washington: Taylor and Maury, 1836; vol. 5, Washington: Taylor and Maury, 1845.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. Ulysses and the Sirens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. Ulysses Unbound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

An Experimental Essay Touching the Reformation of the Lawes of England. Aug. 17 1648 (E 541).

Farrand, Max, ed. The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, vol. 1–3. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John. “The Politics of Imperfection: The Amendment of Constitutions.” 22 Law and Social Inquiry501–31, at 504 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferejohn, John and Pasquale Pasquino. “Rule of Democracy and Rule of Law.” In Democracy and the Rule of Law, eds. Maravall, José María and Przeworski, Adam. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkelman, Paul. Slavery and the Founders: Race and Liberty in the Age of Jefferson. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2001.Google Scholar

Finley, Moses. The Use and Abuse of History. New York: Viking Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Finn, John E.Constitutions in Crisis: Political Violence and the Rule of Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Fisch, Jill E. “Retroactivity and Legal Change,” 110 Harvard Law Review1055 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleming, James E. “We the Exceptional American People.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotirios A. and George, Robert P.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Foreign Relations of the United States 1946, vol. 8: The Far East. Washington, DC: U.S.G.P.O., 1971.

Fornara, Charles W.Archaic Times to the End of the Peloponnesian War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortescue, Sir John. On the Laws and Governance of England, ed. Lockwood, Shelley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Fox, Gregory, and Nolte, George. “Intolerant Democracies.” 36 Harvard International Law Journal1 (1995).Google Scholar

Freehling, William W. “The Founding Fathers and Slavery,” 77 American Historical Review81–93 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, Samuel. “Ordinary Meaning, Democratic Interpretation, and the Constitution.” 21(1) Philosophy and Public Affairs3–42 (1992).Google Scholar

Friedrich, Carl. “Rebuilding the German Constitution, I.” 43(3) American Political Science Review461–82 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gagarin, Michael. Early Greek Law. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Gartzke, Erik, and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. “Why Democracies May Actually Be Less Reliable Allies.” 48(4) American Journal of Political Science775–95 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor. “Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations.” 50 International Organization109–39 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golay, John Ford. The Founding of the Federal Republic of Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Gomme, A. W.A Historical Commentary on Thucydides, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1945.Google Scholar

Gooch, G. P.English Democratic Ideas in the Seventeenth Century. New York: Harper Torchbook, 1959.Google Scholar

Gray, Charles. “Parliament, Liberty, and the Law.” In Parliament and Liberty from the Reign of Elizabeth to the English Civil War, ed. Hexter, J. H.. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Janelle. The Radical Face of the Ancient Constitution: St. Edward's ‘Laws’ in Early Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, with Rehg, William. “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?” 29(6) Political Theory766–81 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hale, Sir Matthew. “Considerations Touching the Amendment or Alteration of Laws.” In A Collection of Legal Tracts Relating to the Law of England, vol. 1, ed. Hargrave, Francis. London: Printed by T. Wright, 1787.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. The Federalist Papers, ed. Rossiter, Clifford. New York: Penguin Books, [1788] 1961.Google Scholar

Hansen, Mogens Herman. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar

Hansen, Mogens Herman. “Nomos and Psephisma in Fourth-Century Athens,” 19 Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies315–30 (1978).Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell. Liberalism, Constitutionalism, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harding, Phillip. From the End of the Peloponnesian War to the Battle of Ipsus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrington, James. The Political Works of James Harrington, ed. Pocock, J. G. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Harris, William F.The Interpretable Constitution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Harrison, A. R. W. “Law-Making at Athens at the End of the Fifth Century BC.” 75 Journal of Hellenic Studies26–35 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, H. L. A.The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A.Law, Legislation, and Liberty, vol. 1: Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Heath, G. D. III. “Making the Instrument of Government.” 6 Journal of British Studies at 31 (1967).Google Scholar

Hedrick, Charles W. Jr. “Democracy and the Athenian Epigraphic Habit.” 68(3) Hesperia387–439 (1999).Google Scholar

Herodotus, . The Histories, trans. Aubrey de Selincourt. London: Penguin Books, 1972.Google Scholar

Hirst, Derek. England in Conflict, 1603–1660. London: Arnold, 1999.Google Scholar

Hirst, Derek. “The Lord Protector, 1653–1658.” In Oliver Cromwell and the English Revolution, ed. Morrill, John. London: Longman, 1990.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. Passions and Constraint. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen, and Cass Sunstein. “The Politics of Revision.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hornblower, Simon. The Greek World 479–323 B.C.London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Huber, Gregory, and Gordon, Sanford. “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When It Runs for Office? 48(2) American Journal of Political Science247–63 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hucko, Elmar M., ed. The Democratic Tradition: Four German Constitutions. Leamington Spa, England: Berg Publishers, 1987.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, William T., Racahl, William M. E., Rutland, et al Robert., eds. The Papers of James Madison (17 vols.). Chicago and Charlottesville: University of Chicago Press and University of Virginia Press, 1962–1991.Google Scholar

Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. “Symposium: Borrowing: The Permeability of Constitutional Borders,” 82 Texas Law Review1763 (2004).Google Scholar

Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. Apple of Gold: Constitutionalism in Israel and in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Arthur J., and Schlink, Bernhard. Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. “Symposium: Borrowing: The Permeability of Constitutional Borders,” 82 Tex. L.R. 1763.

Johnson, James. “What the Politics of Enfranchisement Can Tell Us About How Rational Choice Theorists Study Institutions.” In Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism, eds. Katznelson, Ira and Weingast, Barry R.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2005.Google Scholar

Ulrich, Karpen. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany: Essays on the Basic Rights and Principles of the Basic Law With a Translation of the Basic Law. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1988.Google Scholar

Katz, Elai. “On Amending Constitutions: The Legality and Legitimacy of Constitutional Entrenchment,” 29 Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems251–92 (1996).Google Scholar

Kelly, Duncan. The State of the Political: Conceptions of Politics and the State in the Thought of Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Franz Neumann. Oxford: British Academy/Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Berlin: Julius Springer, 1925.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. Vom Wesen und Wert der Demokratie. Tubingen, Germany: Verlag von J. C. B. Mohr, 1929.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State, trans. Andres Wedberg. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1945.Google Scholar

Kennan, George F.At a Century's Ending: Reflections 1982–1995. New York: Norton, 1996.Google Scholar

Knight, Jack. “Institutionalizing Constitutional Interpretation.” In Constitutional Culture and Democratic Rule, ed. Ferejohn, John, Rakove, Jack N., and Riley, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, Jack. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koch, Adrienne, and Peden, William. The Life and Selected Writings of Thomas Jefferson. New York: Modern Library, 1993.Google Scholar

Koch, H. W.A Constitutional History of Germany in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. London: Longman, 1984.Google Scholar

Kokott, Juliane. “From Reception and Transplantation to Convergence of Constitutional Models in the Age of Globalization.” In Constitutionalism, Universalism, and Democracy: A Comparative Analysis, ed. Starck, Christian. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1999.Google Scholar

Kommers, Donald P.The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, 2nd edition, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997; 1st edition, 1989.Google Scholar

Kommers, Donald P. “Germany: Balancing Rights and Duties.” In Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative Study, ed. Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Kurland, Philip B., and Lerner, Ralph. The Founders' Constitution, vol. 4. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1987.Google Scholar

Larmore, Charles. “The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism.” 96(12) Journal of Philosophy599–625 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law's Discovery, June 27, 1653, E 702 (18).

The Lawyers Bane or the Laws Reformation and New Model, Aug. 13, 1647, E401 (36).

Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774–1789, ed. Smith, Paul H.. Washington: Library of Congress, 1976–2000.Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford. “How Many Times Has the United States Constitution Been Amended? (A) 26; (B) 26; (C) 27; (D) >27: Accounting for Constitution Change.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, David. “The Athenian Coinage Decree.” In Selected Papers in Greek and Near Eastern History, ed. Rhodes, P. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Lewis, David M. “Entrenchment-Clauses in Attic Decrees.” In Phoros: Tribute to Benjamin Dean Meritt, ed. Bradeen, Donald William and McGregor, Malcolm Francis. Locust Valley, NY: J. J. Augustin, 1974.Google Scholar

Lilburne, John. The Just Man's Justification, June 6, 1646, E 340 (12).

Loewenstein, Karl. “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights I.” 31(3) American Political Science Review417–32 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loewenstein, Karl. Über Wesen, Technik, und Grenzen der Verfassungsänderung. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDowell, Douglas M. “Law-Making at Athens in the Fourth Century B.C.,” 95 Journal of Hellenic Studies62–74 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDowell, Douglas M.The Law in Classical Athens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

MacDowell, Douglas M.The Law in Classical Athens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

MacDowell, Douglas M.Spartan Law. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Macedo, Stephen. Liberal Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

MacGilvray, Eric A.Reconstructing Public Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Madison, James. Writings, ed. Rakove, Jack. New York: Library of America, 1999.Google Scholar

Maltz, Earl. “Slavery, Federalism, and the Structure of the Constitution.” 36 American Journal of Legal History466–98 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manin, Bernard. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation,” 15(3) Political Theory338–68 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marbury, William. “The Limitations upon the Amending Power.” 33 Harvard Law Review223–35 (1919).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matthews, Richard K.If Men Were Angels: James Madison and the Heartless Empire of Reason. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1995.Google Scholar

Mattingly, Harold. The Athenian Empire Restored. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.Google Scholar

McCormick, John P.Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIlwain, Charles Howard. The High Court of Parliament. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1910.Google Scholar

Meier, Christian. Athens: A Portrait of the City in Its Golden Age. New York: Henry Holt, 1993.Google Scholar

Meiggs, Russell, and Lewis, David. A Selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions to the End of the Fifth Century B.C. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Merkl, Peter H.The Origin of the West German Republic. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963–91.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal. “Carl Schmitt and the Paradox of Liberal Democracy.” In Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism, ed. Dyzenhaus, David. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner. A Dangerous Mind: Carl Schmitt in Post-War European Thought. New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Murphy, Walter. “An Ordering of Constitutional Values.” 53 Southern California Law Review703–60 (1980).Google Scholar

Murphy, Walter F. “Merlin's Memory: The Past and Future Imperfect of the Once and Future Polity.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nedham, Marchamont. Mercurius Politicus, no. 73, Oct. 23–30, 1651. E644 (5).

Nedham, Marchamont. True State of the Commonwealth. 1654. E728 (5)

Ober, Josiah. The Athenian Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Ober, Josiah. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Ober, Josiah, and Hedrick, Charles. Demokratia: A Conversation on Democracies, Ancient and Modern. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Office of Military Government for Germany (United States), Civil Administration Division. Documents on the Creation of the German Federal Constitution. Sept. 1, 1949.

Orfield, Lester Bernhardt. The Amending of the Federal Constitution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1942.Google Scholar

Ostwald, Martin. From Popular Sovereignty to the Sovereignty of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Der Parlamentarische Rat 1948–1949: Akten und Protokolle, ed. Wagner, Johannes Volker. Boppard am Rhein, Germany: Boldt, 1995.Google Scholar

Plato, . The Laws, trans. Trevor J. Saunders. London: Penguin Books, 1970.Google Scholar

Plato, . Statesman, trans. J. B. Skemp; revised and introduced by Martin Ostwald. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992.Google Scholar

Plutarch. Lives, ed. Clough, Arthur Hugh, trans. John Dryden. New York: Mondern Library, 2001.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A.The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A.The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A.Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Preuss, Ulrich K. “Political Order and Democracy: Carl Schmitt and His Influence.” In The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, ed. Mouffe, Chantal. London: Verso, 1999, pp. 155–79.Google Scholar

Rakove, Jack N.Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. New York: Vintage Books, 1997.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Reed, William. “Alliance Duration and Democracy: An Extension and Cross-Validation of ‘Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations.’” 41 American Journal of Political Science1072–78 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhodes, P. J., with Lewis, David. The Decrees of the Greek States. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Robinson, Henry. Certain Proposals in Order to a New Modelling of the Lawes and Law-Proceedings. London: Printed by M. Simmons, 1653.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Michel. “Can Rights, Democracy and Justice Be Reconciled Through Discourse Theory? Reflections of Habermas's Proceduralist Paradigm of Law.” 17 Cardozo Law Review791–824 (1996).Google Scholar

Ross, Alf. “On Self-Reference and a Puzzle in Constitutional Law.” 78 Mind1–24 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruhm von Oppen, Beate. Documents on Germany under Occupation, 1945–54. London: Oxford University Press, 1955.Google Scholar

Ryder, T. T. B.Koine Eirene. London: Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Sanderson, John. Biography of the Signers to the Declaration of Independence. Philadelphia: R. W. Pomeroy, 1823–27.Google Scholar

Saxonhouse, Arlene W.Athenian Democracy: Modern Mythmakers and Ancient Theorists. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. Verfassungsrechtliche Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1924–1954: Materialien zu einer Verfassungslehre. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 1958.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology, trans. George Schwab. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, trans. Ellen Kennedy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. Legality and Legitimacy, trans. Jeffrey Seitzer. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartzberg, Melissa. “Jeremy Bentham on Fallibility and Infallibity.” Journal of the History of Ideas. Forthcoming.

Seaberg, R. B. “The Norman Conquest and the Common Law: The Levellers and the Argument from Continuity.” 24 Historical Journal791–806 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sealey, Raphael. The Athenian Republic: Democracy or Rule of Law? University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Sealey, Raphael. “On the Athenian Concept of Law,” 77 Classical Journal289–302 (1982).Google Scholar

Shapiro, Barbara. “Law Reform in Seventeenth Century England.” 19 American Journal of Legal History280–312 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Barbara. “Sir Francis Bacon and the Mid-Seventeenth Century Movement for Law Reform.” 24 American Journal of Legal History331–362 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharp, Andrew, ed. The English Levellers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sheldon, Garrett Ward. The Political Philosophy of James Madison. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. Visions of Politics: Volume 3: Hobbes and Civil Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Sommerville, J. P. “Cromwell and His Contemporaries.” In Oliver Cromwell and the English Revolution, ed. Morrill, John. London: Longman, 1990.Google Scholar

Sommerville, J. P.Politics and Ideology in England 1603–1640. London: Longman, 1986.Google Scholar

Steinberger, Helmut. “Historical Influences of American Constitutionalism upon German Constitutional Development: Federalism and Judicial Review.” 36 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law189 (1997).Google Scholar

Steinberger, Helmut. “American Contitutionalism and German Constitutional Development.” In Constitutionalism and Rights: The Influence of the United States Constitution Abroad, Henkin, Louis and Rosenthal, Albert J., eds. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Stepan, Alfred. “Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model.” 10(4) Journal of Democracy19–34 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stroud, Ronald S.The Athenian Grain-Tax Law of 374/3 B.C.Princeton, NJ: American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 1998.Google Scholar

Suber, Peter. The Paradox of Self-Amendment. New York: Peter Lang, 1990.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R.Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Takayanagi, Kenzo, Ohtomo, Ichiro, and Tanaka, Hideo. The Making of the Constitution of Japan, vol. 1: Documents. Tokyo: Yuhikaku, 1972.Google Scholar

Thoma, Richard. “The Reich as Democracy,” trans. Peter C. Caldwell. In Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis, eds. Jacobson, Arthur and Schlink, Bernhard. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Thucydides. The Landmark Thucydides, trans. Richard Crawley, ed. Strassler, Robert B.. New York: Free Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America, trans. and eds. Mansfield, Harvey C. and Winthrop, Delba. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Tod, M. N.A Selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford Uniiversity Press, 1946, 1948.Google Scholar

Todd, S. C.The Shape of Athenian Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard. Natural Rights Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Urbinati, Nadia. Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Vanberg, Georg. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Veall, Donald. The Popular Movement for Law Reform, 1640–60. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Vile, John R.The Constitutional Amending Process in American Political Thought. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1992.Google Scholar

Vile, John R.Constitutional Change in the United States. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1994.Google Scholar

Vile, John R. “The Case against Implicit Limits on the Constitutional Amending Process.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vile, John R.Encyclopedia of Constitutional Amendments, Proposed Amendments, and Amending Issues, 1789–2002, 2nd ed. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio, 2003.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warr, John. The Corruption and Deficiency of the Lawes of England Soberly Discovered. June 11, 1649. London: T. Osborne.Google Scholar

Weston, Corinne. “England: Ancient Constitution and Common Law.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H., with Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Wood, Gordon S.The Creation of the American Republic 1776–1787. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Woolrych, Austin. Commonwealth to Protectorate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Wootton, David. “Leveller Democracy and the Puritan Revolution.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H., with Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Wootton, David, ed. Divine Right and Democracy. Middlesex, England: Penguin Books, 1986.Google Scholar

Worden, Blair. “Republicanism, Regicide, and Republic: The English Experience.” In Republicanism, vol. 1, ed. Gelderen, Martin and Skinner, Quentin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Worden, Blair. The Rump Parliament: 1648–1653. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Xenophon, . Xenophon in Seven Volumes, vol. 7, trans. E. C. Marchand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Yack, Bernard. The Problems of a Political Animal. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Zaret, David. Origins of Democratic Culture: Printing, Petitions, and the Public Sphere in Early-Modern England. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Abbott, W. C.The Writings and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell. 4 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1937–47.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Aeschines, trans. Carey, Chris. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2000.

Amar, Akhil Reed. “Philadelphia Revisited: Amending the Constitution Outside Article V.” 55 University of Chicago Law Review1043 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. “Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Amendment.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antiphon and Andocides, trans. Gagarin, Michael and MacDowell, Douglas M.. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1998.

Aquinas, Saint Thomas. Treatise on Law, trans. Richard J. Regan. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2000.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Rhetoric, trans. W. Rhys Roberts. In Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 2, ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Aristotle. The Politics and the Constitution of Athens, ed. Everson, Steven. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . The Nicomachean Ethics, trans. David Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Politics, trans. Ernest Barker. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Bacon, Sir Francis. The Essayes or Counsels, Civill and Morall, ed. Kiernan, Michael. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Barber, Sotirios A.On What the Constitution Means. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Barber, Sotirios A., and George, Robert P.. Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Benda, Ernst. “The Protection of Human Dignity (Article 1 of the Basic Law).” 53 SMU Law Review443–53 (1999).Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy. Rights, Representation, and Reform, ed. Schofield, P., Pease-Watkins, C., and Blamires, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Richard B. with Agel, Jerome. Amending America: If We Love the Constitution So Much, Why Do We Keep Trying to Change It? Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2000.Google Scholar

Boardman, Roger Sherman. Roger Sherman: Statesman and Signer. New York: Da Capo Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Bork, Robert H.The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law. New York: Free Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Brandon, Mark E. “The ‘Original’ Thirteenth Amendment and the Limits to Formal Constitutional Change.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brecht, Arnold. Federalism and Regionalism in Germany: The Division of Prussia. New York: Oxford University Press, 1945.Google Scholar

Burgess, Glenn. The Politics of the Ancient Constitution. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burns, J. H., ed., with Goldie, Mark. The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Caldwell, Peter C.Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law: The Theory and Practice of Weimar Constitutionalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Cicero. On the Commonwealth and On the Laws, ed. Zetzel, James E. G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean L., and Arato, Andrew. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Coke, Sir Edward. The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, or, A Commentary upon Littleton. Union, NJ: Lawbook Exchange, 1999.Google Scholar

Coke, Sir Edward. La Sept Part Des Reports Sr. Edw. Coke Chiualer, Chief Justice del Common Banke, 1608.

Collier, Christopher. Roger Sherman's Connecticut: Yankee Politics and the American Revolution. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Cooley, Thomas M. “The Power to Amend the Federal Constitution.” 4 Michigan Law Journal117 (1893).Google Scholar

Cotterell, Mary. “Interregnum Law Reform: The Hale Commission of 1652.” 83 English Historical Review689–704 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Currie, David. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Da Silva, Virgílio Afonso. “A Fossilized Constitution,” 17(4) Ratio Juris454–73 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demosthenes, . Against Meidias, Androtion, Aristocrates, Timocrates, Aristogeiton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1935.Google Scholar

Dodd, Walter. Revision and Amendment of State Constitutions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1910.Google Scholar

Dow, David R. “The Plain Meaning of Article V.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. “Equality, Democracy and Constitution: We the People in Court.” 28 Alberta Law Review (1990).Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Freedom's Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David. Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Eberle, Edward J. “Human Dignity, Privacy, and Personality in German and American Constitutional Law.” Utah Law Review963 (1997).Google Scholar

Eisgruber, Christopher. Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Elliot, Jonathan, ed. The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution as Recommended by the General Convention at Philadelphia in 1787. … 4 vols., 2nd ed. Washington: Taylor and Maury, 1836; vol. 5, Washington: Taylor and Maury, 1845.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. Ulysses and the Sirens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. Ulysses Unbound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

An Experimental Essay Touching the Reformation of the Lawes of England. Aug. 17 1648 (E 541).

Farrand, Max, ed. The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, vol. 1–3. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John. “The Politics of Imperfection: The Amendment of Constitutions.” 22 Law and Social Inquiry501–31, at 504 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferejohn, John and Pasquale Pasquino. “Rule of Democracy and Rule of Law.” In Democracy and the Rule of Law, eds. Maravall, José María and Przeworski, Adam. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkelman, Paul. Slavery and the Founders: Race and Liberty in the Age of Jefferson. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2001.Google Scholar

Finley, Moses. The Use and Abuse of History. New York: Viking Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Finn, John E.Constitutions in Crisis: Political Violence and the Rule of Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Fisch, Jill E. “Retroactivity and Legal Change,” 110 Harvard Law Review1055 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleming, James E. “We the Exceptional American People.” In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, eds. Barber, Sotirios A. and George, Robert P.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Foreign Relations of the United States 1946, vol. 8: The Far East. Washington, DC: U.S.G.P.O., 1971.

Fornara, Charles W.Archaic Times to the End of the Peloponnesian War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fortescue, Sir John. On the Laws and Governance of England, ed. Lockwood, Shelley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Fox, Gregory, and Nolte, George. “Intolerant Democracies.” 36 Harvard International Law Journal1 (1995).Google Scholar

Freehling, William W. “The Founding Fathers and Slavery,” 77 American Historical Review81–93 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, Samuel. “Ordinary Meaning, Democratic Interpretation, and the Constitution.” 21(1) Philosophy and Public Affairs3–42 (1992).Google Scholar

Friedrich, Carl. “Rebuilding the German Constitution, I.” 43(3) American Political Science Review461–82 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gagarin, Michael. Early Greek Law. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Gartzke, Erik, and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. “Why Democracies May Actually Be Less Reliable Allies.” 48(4) American Journal of Political Science775–95 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor. “Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations.” 50 International Organization109–39 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golay, John Ford. The Founding of the Federal Republic of Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Gomme, A. W.A Historical Commentary on Thucydides, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1945.Google Scholar

Gooch, G. P.English Democratic Ideas in the Seventeenth Century. New York: Harper Torchbook, 1959.Google Scholar

Gray, Charles. “Parliament, Liberty, and the Law.” In Parliament and Liberty from the Reign of Elizabeth to the English Civil War, ed. Hexter, J. H.. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Janelle. The Radical Face of the Ancient Constitution: St. Edward's ‘Laws’ in Early Modern Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, with Rehg, William. “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?” 29(6) Political Theory766–81 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hale, Sir Matthew. “Considerations Touching the Amendment or Alteration of Laws.” In A Collection of Legal Tracts Relating to the Law of England, vol. 1, ed. Hargrave, Francis. London: Printed by T. Wright, 1787.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. The Federalist Papers, ed. Rossiter, Clifford. New York: Penguin Books, [1788] 1961.Google Scholar

Hansen, Mogens Herman. The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar

Hansen, Mogens Herman. “Nomos and Psephisma in Fourth-Century Athens,” 19 Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies315–30 (1978).Google Scholar

Hardin, Russell. Liberalism, Constitutionalism, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harding, Phillip. From the End of the Peloponnesian War to the Battle of Ipsus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrington, James. The Political Works of James Harrington, ed. Pocock, J. G. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Harris, William F.The Interpretable Constitution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Harrison, A. R. W. “Law-Making at Athens at the End of the Fifth Century BC.” 75 Journal of Hellenic Studies26–35 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, H. L. A.The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A.Law, Legislation, and Liberty, vol. 1: Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Heath, G. D. III. “Making the Instrument of Government.” 6 Journal of British Studies at 31 (1967).Google Scholar

Hedrick, Charles W. Jr. “Democracy and the Athenian Epigraphic Habit.” 68(3) Hesperia387–439 (1999).Google Scholar

Herodotus, . The Histories, trans. Aubrey de Selincourt. London: Penguin Books, 1972.Google Scholar

Hirst, Derek. England in Conflict, 1603–1660. London: Arnold, 1999.Google Scholar

Hirst, Derek. “The Lord Protector, 1653–1658.” In Oliver Cromwell and the English Revolution, ed. Morrill, John. London: Longman, 1990.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. Passions and Constraint. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen, and Cass Sunstein. “The Politics of Revision.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hornblower, Simon. The Greek World 479–323 B.C.London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Huber, Gregory, and Gordon, Sanford. “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When It Runs for Office? 48(2) American Journal of Political Science247–63 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hucko, Elmar M., ed. The Democratic Tradition: Four German Constitutions. Leamington Spa, England: Berg Publishers, 1987.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, William T., Racahl, William M. E., Rutland, et al Robert., eds. The Papers of James Madison (17 vols.). Chicago and Charlottesville: University of Chicago Press and University of Virginia Press, 1962–1991.Google Scholar

Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. “Symposium: Borrowing: The Permeability of Constitutional Borders,” 82 Texas Law Review1763 (2004).Google Scholar

Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. Apple of Gold: Constitutionalism in Israel and in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Arthur J., and Schlink, Bernhard. Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. “Symposium: Borrowing: The Permeability of Constitutional Borders,” 82 Tex. L.R. 1763.

Johnson, James. “What the Politics of Enfranchisement Can Tell Us About How Rational Choice Theorists Study Institutions.” In Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism, eds. Katznelson, Ira and Weingast, Barry R.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2005.Google Scholar

Ulrich, Karpen. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany: Essays on the Basic Rights and Principles of the Basic Law With a Translation of the Basic Law. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1988.Google Scholar

Katz, Elai. “On Amending Constitutions: The Legality and Legitimacy of Constitutional Entrenchment,” 29 Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems251–92 (1996).Google Scholar

Kelly, Duncan. The State of the Political: Conceptions of Politics and the State in the Thought of Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Franz Neumann. Oxford: British Academy/Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Berlin: Julius Springer, 1925.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. Vom Wesen und Wert der Demokratie. Tubingen, Germany: Verlag von J. C. B. Mohr, 1929.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State, trans. Andres Wedberg. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1945.Google Scholar

Kennan, George F.At a Century's Ending: Reflections 1982–1995. New York: Norton, 1996.Google Scholar

Knight, Jack. “Institutionalizing Constitutional Interpretation.” In Constitutional Culture and Democratic Rule, ed. Ferejohn, John, Rakove, Jack N., and Riley, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, Jack. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koch, Adrienne, and Peden, William. The Life and Selected Writings of Thomas Jefferson. New York: Modern Library, 1993.Google Scholar

Koch, H. W.A Constitutional History of Germany in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. London: Longman, 1984.Google Scholar

Kokott, Juliane. “From Reception and Transplantation to Convergence of Constitutional Models in the Age of Globalization.” In Constitutionalism, Universalism, and Democracy: A Comparative Analysis, ed. Starck, Christian. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1999.Google Scholar

Kommers, Donald P.The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, 2nd edition, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997; 1st edition, 1989.Google Scholar

Kommers, Donald P. “Germany: Balancing Rights and Duties.” In Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative Study, ed. Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Kurland, Philip B., and Lerner, Ralph. The Founders' Constitution, vol. 4. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1987.Google Scholar

Larmore, Charles. “The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism.” 96(12) Journal of Philosophy599–625 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law's Discovery, June 27, 1653, E 702 (18).

The Lawyers Bane or the Laws Reformation and New Model, Aug. 13, 1647, E401 (36).

Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774–1789, ed. Smith, Paul H.. Washington: Library of Congress, 1976–2000.Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford. “How Many Times Has the United States Constitution Been Amended? (A) 26; (B) 26; (C) 27; (D) >27: Accounting for Constitution Change.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, David. “The Athenian Coinage Decree.” In Selected Papers in Greek and Near Eastern History, ed. Rhodes, P. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Lewis, David M. “Entrenchment-Clauses in Attic Decrees.” In Phoros: Tribute to Benjamin Dean Meritt, ed. Bradeen, Donald William and McGregor, Malcolm Francis. Locust Valley, NY: J. J. Augustin, 1974.Google Scholar

Lilburne, John. The Just Man's Justification, June 6, 1646, E 340 (12).

Loewenstein, Karl. “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights I.” 31(3) American Political Science Review417–32 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loewenstein, Karl. Über Wesen, Technik, und Grenzen der Verfassungsänderung. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDowell, Douglas M. “Law-Making at Athens in the Fourth Century B.C.,” 95 Journal of Hellenic Studies62–74 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDowell, Douglas M.The Law in Classical Athens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

MacDowell, Douglas M.The Law in Classical Athens. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

MacDowell, Douglas M.Spartan Law. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Macedo, Stephen. Liberal Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

MacGilvray, Eric A.Reconstructing Public Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Madison, James. Writings, ed. Rakove, Jack. New York: Library of America, 1999.Google Scholar

Maltz, Earl. “Slavery, Federalism, and the Structure of the Constitution.” 36 American Journal of Legal History466–98 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manin, Bernard. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation,” 15(3) Political Theory338–68 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marbury, William. “The Limitations upon the Amending Power.” 33 Harvard Law Review223–35 (1919).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matthews, Richard K.If Men Were Angels: James Madison and the Heartless Empire of Reason. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1995.Google Scholar

Mattingly, Harold. The Athenian Empire Restored. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.Google Scholar

McCormick, John P.Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIlwain, Charles Howard. The High Court of Parliament. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1910.Google Scholar

Meier, Christian. Athens: A Portrait of the City in Its Golden Age. New York: Henry Holt, 1993.Google Scholar

Meiggs, Russell, and Lewis, David. A Selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions to the End of the Fifth Century B.C. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Merkl, Peter H.The Origin of the West German Republic. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. Robson, John M.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963–91.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal. “Carl Schmitt and the Paradox of Liberal Democracy.” In Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism, ed. Dyzenhaus, David. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner. A Dangerous Mind: Carl Schmitt in Post-War European Thought. New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Murphy, Walter. “An Ordering of Constitutional Values.” 53 Southern California Law Review703–60 (1980).Google Scholar

Murphy, Walter F. “Merlin's Memory: The Past and Future Imperfect of the Once and Future Polity.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nedham, Marchamont. Mercurius Politicus, no. 73, Oct. 23–30, 1651. E644 (5).

Nedham, Marchamont. True State of the Commonwealth. 1654. E728 (5)

Ober, Josiah. The Athenian Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Ober, Josiah. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Ober, Josiah, and Hedrick, Charles. Demokratia: A Conversation on Democracies, Ancient and Modern. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Office of Military Government for Germany (United States), Civil Administration Division. Documents on the Creation of the German Federal Constitution. Sept. 1, 1949.

Orfield, Lester Bernhardt. The Amending of the Federal Constitution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1942.Google Scholar

Ostwald, Martin. From Popular Sovereignty to the Sovereignty of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Der Parlamentarische Rat 1948–1949: Akten und Protokolle, ed. Wagner, Johannes Volker. Boppard am Rhein, Germany: Boldt, 1995.Google Scholar

Plato, . The Laws, trans. Trevor J. Saunders. London: Penguin Books, 1970.Google Scholar

Plato, . Statesman, trans. J. B. Skemp; revised and introduced by Martin Ostwald. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992.Google Scholar

Plutarch. Lives, ed. Clough, Arthur Hugh, trans. John Dryden. New York: Mondern Library, 2001.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A.The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A.The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A.Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Preuss, Ulrich K. “Political Order and Democracy: Carl Schmitt and His Influence.” In The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, ed. Mouffe, Chantal. London: Verso, 1999, pp. 155–79.Google Scholar

Rakove, Jack N.Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. New York: Vintage Books, 1997.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Reed, William. “Alliance Duration and Democracy: An Extension and Cross-Validation of ‘Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations.’” 41 American Journal of Political Science1072–78 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhodes, P. J., with Lewis, David. The Decrees of the Greek States. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Robinson, Henry. Certain Proposals in Order to a New Modelling of the Lawes and Law-Proceedings. London: Printed by M. Simmons, 1653.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Michel. “Can Rights, Democracy and Justice Be Reconciled Through Discourse Theory? Reflections of Habermas's Proceduralist Paradigm of Law.” 17 Cardozo Law Review791–824 (1996).Google Scholar

Ross, Alf. “On Self-Reference and a Puzzle in Constitutional Law.” 78 Mind1–24 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruhm von Oppen, Beate. Documents on Germany under Occupation, 1945–54. London: Oxford University Press, 1955.Google Scholar

Ryder, T. T. B.Koine Eirene. London: Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Sanderson, John. Biography of the Signers to the Declaration of Independence. Philadelphia: R. W. Pomeroy, 1823–27.Google Scholar

Saxonhouse, Arlene W.Athenian Democracy: Modern Mythmakers and Ancient Theorists. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. Verfassungsrechtliche Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1924–1954: Materialien zu einer Verfassungslehre. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 1958.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology, trans. George Schwab. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy, trans. Ellen Kennedy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. Legality and Legitimacy, trans. Jeffrey Seitzer. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartzberg, Melissa. “Jeremy Bentham on Fallibility and Infallibity.” Journal of the History of Ideas. Forthcoming.

Seaberg, R. B. “The Norman Conquest and the Common Law: The Levellers and the Argument from Continuity.” 24 Historical Journal791–806 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sealey, Raphael. The Athenian Republic: Democracy or Rule of Law? University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Sealey, Raphael. “On the Athenian Concept of Law,” 77 Classical Journal289–302 (1982).Google Scholar

Shapiro, Barbara. “Law Reform in Seventeenth Century England.” 19 American Journal of Legal History280–312 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Barbara. “Sir Francis Bacon and the Mid-Seventeenth Century Movement for Law Reform.” 24 American Journal of Legal History331–362 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharp, Andrew, ed. The English Levellers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sheldon, Garrett Ward. The Political Philosophy of James Madison. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. Visions of Politics: Volume 3: Hobbes and Civil Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Sommerville, J. P. “Cromwell and His Contemporaries.” In Oliver Cromwell and the English Revolution, ed. Morrill, John. London: Longman, 1990.Google Scholar

Sommerville, J. P.Politics and Ideology in England 1603–1640. London: Longman, 1986.Google Scholar

Steinberger, Helmut. “Historical Influences of American Constitutionalism upon German Constitutional Development: Federalism and Judicial Review.” 36 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law189 (1997).Google Scholar

Steinberger, Helmut. “American Contitutionalism and German Constitutional Development.” In Constitutionalism and Rights: The Influence of the United States Constitution Abroad, Henkin, Louis and Rosenthal, Albert J., eds. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Stepan, Alfred. “Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model.” 10(4) Journal of Democracy19–34 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stroud, Ronald S.The Athenian Grain-Tax Law of 374/3 B.C.Princeton, NJ: American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 1998.Google Scholar

Suber, Peter. The Paradox of Self-Amendment. New York: Peter Lang, 1990.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass R.Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Takayanagi, Kenzo, Ohtomo, Ichiro, and Tanaka, Hideo. The Making of the Constitution of Japan, vol. 1: Documents. Tokyo: Yuhikaku, 1972.Google Scholar

Thoma, Richard. “The Reich as Democracy,” trans. Peter C. Caldwell. In Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis, eds. Jacobson, Arthur and Schlink, Bernhard. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Thucydides. The Landmark Thucydides, trans. Richard Crawley, ed. Strassler, Robert B.. New York: Free Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America, trans. and eds. Mansfield, Harvey C. and Winthrop, Delba. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Tod, M. N.A Selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford Uniiversity Press, 1946, 1948.Google Scholar

Todd, S. C.The Shape of Athenian Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard. Natural Rights Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Urbinati, Nadia. Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Vanberg, Georg. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Veall, Donald. The Popular Movement for Law Reform, 1640–60. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Vile, John R.The Constitutional Amending Process in American Political Thought. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1992.Google Scholar

Vile, John R.Constitutional Change in the United States. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1994.Google Scholar

Vile, John R. “The Case against Implicit Limits on the Constitutional Amending Process.” In Responding to Imperfection, ed. Levinson, Sanford. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vile, John R.Encyclopedia of Constitutional Amendments, Proposed Amendments, and Amending Issues, 1789–2002, 2nd ed. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio, 2003.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. The Dignity of Legislation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warr, John. The Corruption and Deficiency of the Lawes of England Soberly Discovered. June 11, 1649. London: T. Osborne.Google Scholar

Weston, Corinne. “England: Ancient Constitution and Common Law.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H., with Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Wood, Gordon S.The Creation of the American Republic 1776–1787. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Woolrych, Austin. Commonwealth to Protectorate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Wootton, David. “Leveller Democracy and the Puritan Revolution.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J. H., with Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Wootton, David, ed. Divine Right and Democracy. Middlesex, England: Penguin Books, 1986.Google Scholar

Worden, Blair. “Republicanism, Regicide, and Republic: The English Experience.” In Republicanism, vol. 1, ed. Gelderen, Martin and Skinner, Quentin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Worden, Blair. The Rump Parliament: 1648–1653. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Xenophon, . Xenophon in Seven Volumes, vol. 7, trans. E. C. Marchand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Yack, Bernard. The Problems of a Political Animal. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Zaret, David. Origins of Democratic Culture: Printing, Petitions, and the Public Sphere in Early-Modern England. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar