Adler, Matthew H., If We Build It, Will They Come? The Need for a Multilateral Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Civil Monetary Judgments, 26 Law & Pol'y Int'l Bus.79 (1989).Google Scholar

Beaumont, Paul R., A United Kingdom Perspective on the Proposed Hague Judgments Convention, 24 Brooklyn J. Int'l L.75, 100 (1998).Google Scholar

Christophe Bernasconi, Provisional Version of the New Practical Handbook on the Operation of the 1965 Hague Service Convention. July, 2003. Available at: http://hcch.e-vision.nl/upload/wop/lse_pd01e.pdf (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Birke, Richard & Teitz, Louise Ellen, American Law in a Time of Global Interdependence: U.S. National Reports to the 26th International Congress of Comparative Law: Section II, U.S. Mediation in 2001: The Path that Brought America to Uniform Laws and Mediation in Cyberspace. 50 Am. J. Comp. L.181 (Fall 2002).Google Scholar

Bruch, Carol S., The 1989 Inter-American Convention on Support Obligations, 40 Am. J. Comp. L.817 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gary B. Born, International Civil Litigation in United States Courts 298 (3d ed., Kluwer Law Int'l., 1996)

Glenn, H. Patrick, Foreign Judgments, the Common Law and the Constitution: De Savoye v. Morguard Investments Ltd, 37 McGill L.J.537 (1992).Google Scholar

Hague Conference on Private International Law, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Prel. Docs. Nos. 2–6 (Dec. 1995–Aug. 1996)

Hague Conference on Private International Law, Conclusions of the Special Commission of May 2000 on General Affairs and Policy of the Conference, Prel. Doc. No. 10 (June 2000)

Internet and Federal Courts: Issues and Obstacles: Hearing before the Subcomm. on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Comm. on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, 106th Cong. 2 (2000) (witness testimony of Jeffrey Kovar, Assistant Legal Advisor for Private International Law, U.S. Department of State), at 22

Juenger, Fredriech K., A Shoe Unfit for Globetrotting, IV. Impediments to International Accommodation, 28 U.C. Davis L. Rev.1027, 1050 (1995).Google Scholar

Lipstein, Kurt, One Hundred Years of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, 42 Int'l Comp. L.Q.554 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynch, Katherine, The Forces of Economic Globalization: Challenges to the Regime of International Commercial Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer Law Int'l., 2003).Google Scholar

Maier, Harold G., A Hague Conference Judgments Convention and United States Courts: A Problem and a Possibility, 61 Alb. L. Rev.1207 (1998).Google Scholar

Nygh, Peter, Arthur's Baby: The Hague Negotiations for a World-Wide Judgments Convention in Law and Justice in a Multistate World: Essays in Honor of Arthur T. von Mehren 151 (Nafziger, J. & Symeonides, S., eds., 2002, Transnational Publishers, Inc,).Google Scholar

Gonzalo Parra-Aranguren, The Centenary of the Hague Conference on Private International Law in Etudes de Droit International en L'Honneur de Pierre Lalive (Christian Dominice, Robert Patry, & Claude Reymond eds., 1993)

Pfund, Peter H., International Unification of Private Law: A Report on United States Participation, 1985–1986, 20 Int'l Law.623 (1986).Google Scholar

Pfund, Peter H., The Hague Conference Celebrates Its 100th Anniversary, 28 Tex. Int'l L.J.531 (1993).Google Scholar

Pfund, Peter H., United States Participation in International Unification of Private Law, 19 Int'l Law.505 (1985).Google Scholar

Reese, W. & Johnson, V., The Scope of the Full Faith and Credit to Judgments, 49 Colum. L. Rev.153, 161 (1949) (quoting Sherrer v. Sherrer, 334 U.S. 343, 355 (1948)).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrea Schultz, Reflection Paper to Assist in Preparation of a Convention on Jurisdiction and Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Prel. Doc. No. 19, p. 6 (Aug. 2002), Hague Conference on Private International Law, available at: http://www.hcch.net/upload/wop/jdgm_pdlge.pdf (last accessed Mar. 22, 2006)

U. Schneider, The Uniform Rules for International Credit Transfers Under the UNCITRAL Model Law in Legal Issues in International Credit Transfers 451 (W. Hadding & U. Schneider eds., Berlin, 1993)

Sherman, Edward F., American Class Actions: Significant Features and Developing Alternatives in Foreign Legal Systems, 215 F.R.D.130 (2003).Google Scholar

Survey Regarding Business Practices on Jurisdictional Issues, Int'l Chamber of Commerce (Mar. 2003)

Symposium: New Directions in Comparative Law, 46 Am. J. Comp. L.597 (1998).

Symposium: New Approaches to Comparative Law, 1 997 Utah L. Rev.255 (1997).

Farrow, Trevor C. W., Globalization, International Human Rights, and Civil Procedure, 41 Alberta L. Rev.671 (Dec. 2003).Google Scholar

U.S. Department of State Authentication Office, available at: http://www.state.gov/m/a/auth/ (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Varady, J. Barcelo III, & A. von Mehren, International Commercial Arbitration (3d ed., Thomson-West 2006)

Mehren, Arthur & Trautman, Donald T., Recognition of Foreign Adjudications: A Survey and a Suggested Approach, 81 Harv. L. Rev.1601, 1610 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehren, Arthur, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: a New Approach for the Hague Conference?, 57 Law & Contemp. Prob.271 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

G. Walter & S. Baumgartner, General Report – The Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments Outside the Scope of the Brussels and Lugano Conventions in 3 Civil Procedure in Europe – the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments Outside the Scope of the Brussels and Lugano Conventions (G. Walter & S. Baumgartner eds. Klewer Law Int'l., 2000)

Weintraub, Russell J., How Substantial Is Our Need for a Judgments Recognition Convention and What Should We Bargain Away to Get It? 24 Brooklyn J. Int'l.174 (1998).Google Scholar

Zekoll, Joachim, The Role and Status of American Law in the Hague Judgments Convention Project, 61 Albany L. Rev.1283, 1297–1306 (1998).Google Scholar

Congress Approving the United States as a Member of the Hague Conference. 22 U.S.C. 269(g) (1988)

Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States 421, Reporters' Note 4 (1987)

Uncitral Model Law on International Credit Transfers, adopted by the United Nations Commission on International Law on May 15, 1992

Schlunk v. Volkswagenwerk A. G., 486 U.S. 694 (1988) [Service of Process]

Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme et L'Antisemitisme, 169 F. Supp. 2d 1181 (2001) [Comity]

Delbruek v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, 464 F. Supp. 989 (S.D.N.Y. 1979), at 993 [Choice of Law]

Evra Corporation v. Swiss Bank Corporation, 522 F. Supp. 820 (N.D. Ill. 1981), at 826 [Choice of Law]

Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd. v. Bloch, [1983] 1 W.L.R. 730, 733 (Eng. C.A. 1982)

Draft on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Work. Doc. No. 110 E, Revised, April 2004

Draft on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Work. Doc. No. 49 E, Revised, December 2003

Final Draft Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Doc. No. 37 (June 30, 2005)

Masato Dogauchi and Trevor Hartley, Draft Report on Preliminary Draft Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Prel. Doc. No. 25 (March 2004), at 6–7

Brussels Convention for most EC Member States, 348 final of July 14, 1999

Collection of Hague Conference Conventions (1951–2003). HCCH Publications, 2003

Comment, The United States and the Hague Conferences on Private International Law, 1 Am. J. Comp. L.268 (1952).CrossRef

Comments on IPR Aspects of Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgment in Civil and Commercial Matters (Consumer Project on Technology, Washington, D.C.), Jan. 12, 2001, available at: http://www.cptech.org/ecom/hague/CPT-Hague-IPR-Jan12-USPTO.html (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Comments to the USPTO on Hague Convention (Jurisdiction/Judgments) (A.I.P.L.A. Arlington, VA), Dec. 8, 2000, available at: http://www.aipla.org/Content/ContentGroups/Issues_and_Advocacy/Comments2/Hague_Convention/HagueConvention.pdf (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Commission of the European Communities, Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters 19 (1999) (on file with author)

Communication of 9 August 2000 from the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference to the National Organs of the Member States, L.C. ON No. 44 (00), 2 (2000)

Convention of 15 November 1965 on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=17 (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=24 (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalization for Foreign Public Documents, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=41 (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Convention on the Grant of European Patents, Oct. 5, 1973, 1065 U.N.T.S. 255, 13 I.L.M. 270 [hereinafter EPC]

Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards [New York Convention], 9 U.S.C.A. §201, 21 U.S.T. 2517, 330 U.N.T.S. 38 (1959)

European Communities, Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1972 O.J. (L299) 32, reprinted as amended in 29 I.L.M. 1413 (1990)

Explanatory Report on the 1965 Hague Choice of Court Convention; L. Welamson; 1965

Explanatory Report on the 1965 Hague Service Convention; V. Taborda Ferreira; 1965

Explanatory Report on the 1971 Hague Judgments Convention; C. N. Fragistas & G. Droz; 1969

Hague Conference on Private International Law. Proceedings of the Special Commission with a Diplomatic Character of September–October 1999, at 461

Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Certain Rights in respect of Securities held with an Intermediary, 13 December 2002

Hague Conference on Private International Law, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=98

Inter-American Convention on Support Obligations, July 15, 1989, Art. 8, 29 I.L.M. 73 (1990)

International Criminal Court (ICC): Report of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court on Sudan (June 29, 2005)

International Law Commission, Draft Code of Crimes Against the Peace and Security of Mankind, 1996, art. 18, at http://www.un.org/law/ilc/texts/dcodefra.htm (last accessed Aug. 15,2005)

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS): Election of Seven Members (June 22, 2005)

Catherine Kessedjian, Synthesis of the Work of the Special Commission of March 1998 on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Hague Conf. Prelim. Doc. No. 9 (July 1998)

Catherine Kessedjian, Synthesis of the Work of the Special Commission of March 1998 on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Preliminary Document No. 9, at 40–44 (1998)

Letter from Edwin D. Williamson, Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, to Georges Droz, Secretary General, The Hague Conference on Private International Law (May 5, 1992) (Hague Conference document L.C. ON No. 15 (92)).

Letter from Jeffrey D. Kovar, Assistant Legal Adviser for Private International Law, U.S. Dept. of State, to J. H. A. van Loon, Secretary General, Hague Conference on Private International Law (Feb. 22, 2000)

Letter from Jeffrey D. Kovar, Assistant Legal Advisor for Private International Law, United States Department of State, to J. H. A. van Loon, Secretary General, Hague Conference on Private International Law (Feb. 22, 2000) (on file with author)

Letter from Jeffrey Kovar, Assistant Legal Advisor for Private International Law, U.S. Department of State, to Alasdair Wallace, Head of International and Common Law Services Division, England, (Sept. 10, 2000)

Note of Question of “Forum Non-Conveniens” in the Perspective of the Double Convention on Judicial Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Decisions, Prel. Doc. No. 3 (1996), available at: http://www.state.gov/www/global/legal_affairs/forum.html (last accessed.15, 2005)

P. Nygh & F. Pocar, Report of the Special Commission, available at the Hague Conference Web site, http://www.hcch.net (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Permanent Bureau, Conclusions of the Working Group Meeting on Enforcement of Judgments in the Hague Conference on Private International Law, Proceedings of the Seventeenth Session 10 to 29 May 29, 1993, Tome I, 17 H.C.P.I.L. Proc. 257 (1995)

Resolution adopted by the Seventeenth Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, 19 May 1993, available at: www.hcch.net/e/resolution.html

Statute of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, July 1955

Statute of The Hague Conference on Private International Law, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=29 (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Summary of the Outcome of the Discussion in Commission II of the First Part of the Diplomatic Conference of 6–20 June 2001, available at: www.hcch.net, (2001 Draft)

Supplementary Protocol to The Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1 February 1971

Supplementary Protocol to the Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1971 Hague Convention

The Hague Conference on Private International Law. Seehttp://www.hcch.net/index_en.php (last accessed Aug. 15,2005)

The Hague Convention Concerning the International Administration of the Estates of Deceased Persons, 2 October 1973

The Hague Convention Concerning the Recognition of the Legal Personality of Foreign Companies, Associations and Institutions, 1 June 1956

The Hague Convention listing of Member States. Seehttp://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=states.listing (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

The Hague Convention on International Access to Justice, 25 October 1980

The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law and Recognition of Decrees Relating to Adoptions, 15 November 1965

The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-Operation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children, 19 generic Referencer 1996

The Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-Operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption, 29 May 1993

The Hague Convention on the Choice of Court, 25 November 1965

The Hague Convention on the International Protection of Adults, 13 January 2000

The Hague Convention on the Jurisdiction of the Selected Forum in the Case of International Sales of Goods, 15 April 1958

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Agency, 14 March 1978

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, 22 December 1986

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to International Sales of Goods, 15 June 1955

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations, 2 October 1973

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Trusts and on Their Recognition, 1 July 1985

The Hague Convention on the Law Governing Transfer of Title in International Sales of Goods, 15 April 1958

The Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions Relating to Maintenance Obligations, 2 October 1973

The Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1 February 1971

The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters (Nov. 15, 1965)

The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters (Nov. 15, 1965), which were reviewed in 2003 by a Conference Special Committee

The Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (Mar. 18, 1970)

The Hague Convention Relating to Civil Procedure, 1 March 1954

The Hague Convention Relating to the Settlement of the Conflicts Between the Law of Nationality and the Law of Domicile, 15 June 1955

U.S.-U.K. Convention on the Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil Matters. 16 I.L.M. 71 (1977), revised in 1979, reprinted in 8 N.C.J. Int'l. & Comm. Reg. 322 (1983)

UNCC Governing Council: Report and Recommendations Made by the Panel of Commissioners Concerning the Fifth Installment of F4 Claims (June 30, 2005)

UNCITRAL: Adoption of Draft Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracting (July 15, 2005)

United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, June 10, 1958, 21 U.S.T. 2517, T.I.A.S. No. 6997, 330 U.N.T.S. 38

U.S. participation in the Hague Conference on Private International Law was authorized by Congress in 1963. H.R.J. Res. 778, 88th Cong., 77 Stat. 775 (1963), codified as amended at 22 U.S.C. § 269g (1988)

U.S. Participation in the Hague Conference and the Rome Institute: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on International Organizations and Movements of the House Comm. on Foreign Affairs, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. 732 (1963)

Arthur von Mehren, Minutes No. 3, Commission I, Seventeenth Session, Hague Conference on Private International Law, Meeting of 20 May 1993, at 1 (on file with the Cornell International Law Journal)

Brand, Ronald A., Foreign Judgments in U.S. Courts 2 Can. Int'l Law.10 (1996).Google Scholar

Coffino, M. J. & Wolff, M. T., Choice of Law and Forum Clauses, Int'l Comm. Lit. 37. (Dec. 1995–Jan. 1996).Google Scholar

Kennett, W., Forum Non Conveniens in Europe, 54 Cambridge L.J.552 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lober, Burckhardt, Forum Shopping, Forum non Conveniens oder Schlicht: Justizgewahrungsanspruch, 6 IPRAX283 (1986).Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas F., Thoughts About a Multinational Judgments Convention: A Reaction to the von Mehren Report, 57 Law & Contemp. Probs.289 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Arthur R. & Crump, David, Jurisdiction and Choice of Law in Multistate Class Actions After Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, 96 Yale L.J.1, 16 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, M. Paul, Forum Selection Clauses and Fundamental Breach: Z.I. Pompey Industrie v. Ecu-Line N.V., The Canmar Fortune, 36 Can. Bus. L.J.453 (2002).Google Scholar

Rabel, Ernst, The Conflict of Laws – A Comparative Study (4 vols., 1945–1954). Martin Stueckelberg, Lis Pendens and Forum Non Conveniens at the Hague Conference, 26 Brooklyn J. Int'l L.949 (2001).Google Scholar

Reimann, Mathias, Parochialism in American Conflicts Law. 49 Am. J. Comp. L.369 (Summer 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robertson, , The Federal Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens: “An Object Lesson in Uncontrolled Discretion,” 29 Tex. Int'l L.J.353, 370, n.139 (1994).Google Scholar

Symeon C. Symeonides, Wendy Collins Perdue, & Arthur T. von Mehren, Cases and Materials on Conflict of Laws: American, Comparative, International 820–21 (2d ed., Thomson-West, 2003)

Mehren, Arthur T. & Trautman, Donald T., Recognition of Foreign Adjudications: A Survey and a Suggested Approach, 81 Harv. L. Rev.1601, 1606–07 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehren, Arthur T., Drafting A Convention on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments Acceptable Worldwide: Can the Hague Conference Project Succeed? 49 Am. J. Comp. L.191 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brand, Ronald A., Intellectual Property, Electronic Commerce and the Preliminary Hague Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention, 62 U. Pitt. L. Rev.581, 582 (2001).Google Scholar

Brand, Ronald A., Intellectual Property, Electronic Commerce and the Preliminary Draft Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 62 U. Pitt. L. Rev.581, 587 (2001).Google Scholar

Brinkhof, Jan J., Could the President of the District Court of the Hague Take Measures Concerning the Infringement of Foreign Patents? 16 Eur. Intell. Prop. Rev.360, 361 (1994).Google Scholar

DeCluitt, Christopher D., International Patent Prosecution, Litigation and Enforcement, 5 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L.135 (1997).Google Scholar

Dreyfuss, Rochelle C., Symposium: Intellectual Property Challenges in the Next Century – An Alert to the Intellectual Property Bar: The Hague Judgments Convention, U. Ill. L. Rev.421, 427 (2001), citing Draft Hague Convention art. 17.Google Scholar

Elacqua, Benjamin C., The Hague Runs into B2B: Why Restructuring the Hague Convention of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters to Deal With B2B Contracts Is Long Overdue, 3 J. High Tech. L.93 (2004).Google Scholar

J., Dick C.A. Van Engelen, Intellectual Property Issues in Cross-Border Transactions, 5 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L.135 (1997).Google Scholar

Bermann, George A., The Use of Anti-Suit Injunctions in International Litigation, 28 Colum. J. Transnat'l L.589, 594–5 (1990).Google Scholar

Hartley, Trevor C., Antisuit Injunctions and the Brussels Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention, 49 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.166 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas F., Forum Shopping, Antisuit Injunctions, Negative Declarations and Related Tools of International Litigation, 91 Am. J. Int'l L.314 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudleston, Sarah, Note, Preserving Free Speech in a Global Courtroom: The Proposed Hague Convention and the First Amendment, 10 Minn. J. Global Trade403, 427–28 (2001).Google Scholar

Minehan, Karen E., The Public Policy Exception to the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Necessary or Nemesis?, 18 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L.J.795, 798 (1996).Google Scholar

Shaak, Beth, In Defense of Civil Redress: The Domestic Enforcement of Civil Rights Norms in the Context of the Proposed Hague Judgments Convention, 42 Harv. Int'l L.J.141 (2001).Google Scholar

Alford, Mary Anne, The Effect of the Proposed U.S.-U.K. Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Civil Judgments Treaty on Current Recognition Practices in the U.S, 18 Colum. J. Transnat'l L.119, 120 (1979).Google Scholar

Danford, Brandon, The Enforcement of Foreign Money Judgments in the United States and Europe: How Can We Achieve A Comprehensive Treaty?, 23 Rev. Litig.381, 403 (2004).Google Scholar

Saumier, Genevieve, The Recognition of Foreign Judgments in Quebec – The Mirror Crack'd 81 Can. Bar Rev. 677 at 704–09, 713–15 (2002).Google Scholar

Giovanoli, Paiements et obligations Monetaires internationales, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (1997)

Fairley, H. Scott, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments by Canadian Courts: A New Age of Uncertainty 2 Can. Int'l Law.1 (1996).Google Scholar

Franklin, Johnathan A. & Morris, Roberta J., International Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments in the Era of Global Networks: Irrelevance of, Goals for, and Comments on the Current Proposals, 77 Chi.-Kent L. Rev.1213, 1237–8 (2002).Google Scholar

Miller, Katherine R., Playground Politics: Assessing the Wisdom of Writing a Reciprocity Requirement into U.S. International Recognition and Enforcement Law, 35 Georgetown J. Int'l L.239, 257 (2004).Google Scholar

Mehren, Arthur, Enforcing Judgments Abroad: Reflections on the Design of Recognition Conventions, 24 Brooklyn J. Int'l L.17 (1998).Google Scholar

Bassett, Debra Lyn, U.S. Class Actions Go Global: Transnational Class Actions and Personal Jurisdiction, 72 Fordham L. Rev. 41, 72–3, 91 (2003).Google Scholar

Borchers, Patrick J., Comparing Personal Jurisdiction in the United States and European Community: Lessons for American Reform, 40 Am. J. Comp. L.121, 143–6 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borchers, Patrick J., Could a Treaty Trump Supreme Court Jurisdictional Doctrine? Judgments Conventions and Minimum Contacts, 61 Alb. L. Rev.1161. (1998).Google Scholar

Born, G., Forum Selection Clauses Anatomized, Int'l Comm. Lit. 26 (May 1999).Google Scholar

Brand, , Due Process, Jurisdiction and a Hague Judgments Convention, 60 U. Pitt. L. Rev.661 (1999).

Burbank, Stephan B., Interjurisdictional Preclusion, Full Faith and Credit and Federal Common Law: A General Approach, 71 Cornell L. Rev.733, 744 (1986).Google Scholar

Burbank, Stephan B., Jurisdiction to Adjudicate: End of the Century or Beginning of the Millennium?, 7 Tul. J. Int'l Comp. L.111, at 119 (1999).Google Scholar

Burbank, Stephan B., The Reluctant Partner: Making Procedural Law for International Civil Litigation, 57 Law & Contemp. Probs.103, 131–5 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kessedjian, Catherine, International Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters 12, Hague Conference on Private Int'l Law, Prel. Doc. No.7, 1997 (Kessedjian Report), at 88, cited in Russell J. Weintraub, How Substantial Is Our Need For a Judgments Recognition Convention and What Should We Bargain Away to Get it?, 24 Brooklyn J. Int'l L.167, 186 (1998).Google Scholar

Clayton, Kristen Hudson, The Draft Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments and the Internet – A New Jurisdictional Framework, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev.223, 227–8 (2002).Google Scholar

Clermont, Kevin M., Jurisdictional Salvation and the Hague Treaty, 85 Cornell L. Rev.89 (1999).Google Scholar

Paul R. Dubinsky, The Reach of Doing Business Jurisdiction and Transacting Business Jurisdiction Over Non-U.S. Individuals and Entities (New York Law School, March 1998), available at: http://www.state.gov/www/global/legal_affairs/dubinsky.html

Fastiff, Eric B., The Proposed Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments: A Solution to Butch Reynold's Jurisdiction and Enforcement Problems, 28 Cornell Int'l L.J.469, 470 (1995).Google Scholar

Fawcett, J. J., General Report, in Declining Jurisdiction in Private International Law 10 (Fawcett, J. J. ed., Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).Google Scholar

Trevor C. Hartley, Introduction to the Brussels Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention, in 1994/vol. ⅴ Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, Book 1, 229 (Aspen Publishers, 1996)

P. Kaye, Civil Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments (1987)

O'Brian, William E., The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments: The Way Forward, 66 Mod. L. Rev.491 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Randall, Kenneth C., Universal Jurisdiction Under International Law, 66 Tex. L. Rev.785, 789 (1988).Google Scholar

Silberman, Linda J., Can the Hague Project Be Saved? A Perspective from the United States, in A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgments: Lessons from the Hague 159, 182 (Barcelo, John J. III & Clermont, Kevin M. eds., The Hague/New York: Klewer Law Int'l., 2002).Google Scholar

Theis, William H., Admiralty Proceedings and the Proposed Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments, 32 J. Marshall L. & Com.59, 61–2 (2001).Google Scholar

Peter D. Trooboff, Proposed Hague Conference General Convention on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments – Some Thoughts on Finding Solutions to Tough Issues, in, E Pluribus Unum – Liber Amicorum Georges A. L. Droz (Barras et al., eds. 1996) 461, at 464–5

Twitchell, M., Why We Keep Doing Business with Doing-Business Jurisdiction, 171 U. Chi. Legal F. 202 (2001).Google Scholar

Mehren, Arthur & Trautman, Donald, Jurisdiction to Adjudicate: A Suggested Analysis, 79 Harv. L. Rev.1131 (1966).Google Scholar

Mehren, Arthur, Drafting a Convention on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments Acceptable World-Wide: Can the Hague Convention Project Succeed?, 49 Am. J. Comp. L.191, 194 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehren, Arthur, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments – General Theory and the Role of Jurisdictional Requirements, in Academy of International Law, 167 Receuil des Cours (1980-II) 9–112 (1981).Google Scholar

Horatia Muir Watt, New Perspectives for Jurisdiction and Judgements in Europe: A Critical View (on file with author)

Weinstein, James, The Early American Origins of Territoriality in Judicial Jurisdiction, 37 St. Louis U. L.J.1 (1992).Google Scholar

Adler, Matthew H., If We Build It, Will They Come? – The Need for a Multilateral Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Civil Monetary Judgments, Law & Pol'y Int'l Bus., 79, 91 (Fall 1994).Google Scholar

Anglim, Jennifer M., Crossroads in the Great Race: Moving Beyond the International Race to Judgment in Disputes Over Artwork and Other Chattels, 45 Harv. Int'l L.J.239 (2004).Google Scholar

American Law Institute Certificate of Incorporation, available at: http://www.ali.org, under “Charter, Bylaws and Rules.”

American Law Institute (ALI). Seehttp://ali.org (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Conant, A. B. Jr., The Act of State Doctrine and Its Exceptions: An Introduction, 12 Vand. J. Transnat'l L.259, 259 (1979).Google Scholar

Bassett, Debra Lyn, U.S. Class Actions Go Global: Transnational Class Actions and Personal Jurisdiction, 72 Fordham L. Rev.41, 72–3, 91 (2003).Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Samuel P., Is Transnational Litigation Different? 25 U. Pa. J. Int'l Econ. L. 1297 (2004).Google Scholar

Boyd, Kathryn L., Collective Rights Adjudication in U.S. Courts: Enforcing Human Rights at the Corporate Level, 1999 B.Y.U L. Rev.1139, 1208.Google Scholar

Burbank, Stephen B., Jurisdictional Conflict and Jurisdictional Equilibration: Paths to a Via Media? 26 Hous. J. Int'l L.385 (2004).Google Scholar

Burley, Anne Marie, Law Among Liberal States: Liberal Internationalities and the Act of State Doctrine, 92 Colum. L. Rev.1907, 1948 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carter, P. B., Transnational Recognition and Enforcement of Public Foreign Laws, 48 Cambridge L.J.417 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castel, J. G., Foreign Tax Claims and Judgments in Canadian Courts, 42 Can. B. Rev.277 (1964).Google Scholar

Danford, Brandon B., The Enforcement of Foreign Money Judgments in the United States and Europe: How Can We Achieve a Comprehensive Treaty? 23 Rev. Litig.381 (2004).Google Scholar

Elacqua, Benjamin C., The Hague Runs into B2B: Why Restructuring the Hague Convention of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters to Deal with B2B Contracts is Long Overdue, 3 J. High Tech. L.93 (2004).Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Ruth Bader, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Civil Judgments: A Summary View of the Situation in the United States, 4 Int'l Law. 720 (1970).Google Scholar

Homburger, Adolf, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, 18 Am. J. Comp. L.367, 384–85 (1970).CrossRef

International Bar Association, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Worldwide (Charles Platto and William G. Horton eds., 2d ed., 1993)

Janis, Mark W., The Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Law: The Antelope's Penal Law Exception, 20 Int'l Law.303 (1986).Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas F., Public Law in the International Arena: Conflict of Laws, International Law, and Some Suggestions for Their Interaction, 163 Recueil Des Cours311, 322–6 (1979-II).Google Scholar

Mann, F. A., The International Enforcement of Public Rights, 19 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol.603 (1987).Google Scholar

Marks, Raymond P., Note, Alternative Theories for Establishing a Federal Common Law of Foreign Judgments in Commercial Cases: The Foreign Affairs Power and the Dormant Foreign Commerce Clause, 16 Va. J. Int'l L.635, 642 (1976).Google Scholar

McConnaughay, Philip J., Reviving the “Public Law Taboo” in International Conflict of Laws, 35 Stan. J. Int'l L.255, 283 (1999).Google Scholar

Perez, Antonio F., The International Recognition of Judgments: The Debate Between Private and Public Law Solutions, 19 Berkeley J. Int'l L.44, 44 (2001).Google Scholar

Reese, Willis L., The Status in This Country of Judgments Rendered Abroad, 50 Colo. Law. 783, 790–93 (1950).

Dr. George J. Roman, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Various Foreign Countries, 36 (Washington, D.C.: Law Library of Congress, 1984)

Silberman, Linda J., The Impact of Jurisdictional Rules and Recognition Practice on International Business Transactions: The U.S. Regime, 26 Hous. J. Int'l L.327 (2004).Google Scholar

Mehren, Arthur T. & Trautman, Donald T., Recognition of Foreign Adjudications: A Survey and a Suggested Approach, 81 Harv. L. Rev.1601, 1670 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westbrook, Jay Lawrence, Choice of Avoidance Law in Global Insolvencies, 17 Brooklyn J. Int'l L.499, 520 (1991).Google Scholar

Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution and the implementing statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1738

U.S. Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 201–08, ch. 2, implementing the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention)

Fla. Stat. Ann. § 55.605(2)(g)

N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 524:11

Restatement (Third), The Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 481, Comment c

Restatement (Third), The Foreign Relations Law of the United States §§ 402, 403, 415, 416

Restatement (Third), The Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 482 (1987)

Unif. Foreign Money-Judgments Recognition Act 2, U.L.A. 3 (1962).

Unif. Foreign Money-Judgments Recognition Act, 13 (pt. 2) U.L.A. 43 (2002)

EU Regulation on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments, Council Reg. 44/2001, OJ L 12/1 (2000) Art. 34(1)

Albrecht, A. R., The Enforcement of Taxation Under International Law, 1953 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L.454.

Hamid G. Gharavi, The International Effectiveness of the Annulment of an Arbitral Award (Kluwer Law Int'l., 2002)

Kovatch, William J. Jr., Recognizing Foreign Tax Judgments: An Argument for the Revocation of the Revenue Rule, 22 Hous. J. Int'l L.265 (2000).Google Scholar

Silberman, L. & Lowenfeld, A., A Different Challenge for the ALI: Herein of Foreign Country Judgments, an International Treaty, and an American Statute, 75 Ind. L.J.635 (2000).Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas F. & Silberman, Linda J., U.S. of America, in Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Worldwide 123 (Platto, Charles & Horton, William G. eds., 2nd ed., Graham & Trotman, London; 1993).Google Scholar

Rosen, Mark D., Exporting the Constitution: The Grave Misconception Concerning “Un-American” Foreign Judgments, 53 Emory L.J. (2004).Google Scholar

Eugene F. Scoles, et al., Conflict of Laws 24.45, at 1211 n.12 (3d ed., Thomsons-West St. Paul: 2000)

Silberman, Linda J. & Lowenfeld, Andreas F., A Different Challenge for the ALI: Herein of Foreign Country Judgments, an International Treaty, and an American Statute, 75 Ind. L.J.635, 635 (2000).Google Scholar

Silver, Barbara A., Modernizing the Revenue Rule: The Enforcement of Foreign Tax Judgments, 22 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L.609 (1992).Google Scholar

Strebel, Felix D., The Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Foreign Public Law, 21 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev.55, 55 (1999).Google Scholar

American Law Institute, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Analysis and Proposed Federal Statute. ALI Proposed Final Draft, April 11, 2005

American Law Institute, Reporter's Memorandum in 2002 ALI Draft

American Law Institute, Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure (Preliminary Draft No. 2, March 17, 2000)

American Law Institute/UNIDROIT, Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure, Proposed Final Draft (2004)

Comment in American Law Institute, International Jurisdiction and Judgments Project at 31 (Tentative Draft No. 2, April 14, 2004)

Foreword, American Law Institute, International Jurisdiction and Judgments Project, at xi (Discussion Draft, Mar. 29, 2002)

K. King Burnett, Memorandum in Support of the Motion by Guy Miller Struve, et al, Concerning Proposed Federal Statute on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Country Judgments, submitted to the Executive Office of the American Law Institute at the Eighty-First Annual Meeting on May 17, 18, and 19, 2004

Assn. of the Bar, City of N.Y., Committee on Foreign and Comparative Law, Survey on Foreign Recognition of U.S. Money Judgments (July 2001)

Effect of the Japanese Patent System on American Business: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Foreign Commerce and Tourism of the Senate Comm. on Commerce, Science and Transportation, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. 39 (1988)

Eric M. Freedman, Memorandum to ALI Membership and Council, Re: International Jurisdiction and Judgments Project Public Policy Exception – First Amendment, May 17, 2004

Richard W. Hulbert, Statement in Support of Motion to Delete the Requirement of Reciprocity, submitted to the Executive Office of the American Law Institute at the Eighty-First Annual Meeting on May 17, 18, and 19, 2004

International Law Association, Report of International Committee on Transnational Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Public Laws, in Report of the Sixty-Third Conference 719 (1988)

Catherine Kessedjian, Remarks, Proceedings of the 76th Annual Meeting of the American Law Institute, 76 A.L.I. Proc. 465, at 457 (1999).

Lowenfeld, Andreas F., Remarks, Proceedings of the 79th Annual Meeting of the American Law Institute, 79 A.L.I. Proc.329 (2002).Google Scholar

United Nations Convention 53 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention), Article V(2)(b)

Gerhard Walter & Samuel P. Baumgartner, Civil Procedure in Europe – the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Outside the Scope of the Brussels and Lugano Conventions, 1–45 (G. Walter & S. Baumgartner, eds., Kluwer Law Int'l, 2000)

Devgun, Derek, United States Enforcement of English Defamation Judgments: Exporting the First Amendment?, 23 Anglo-Am. L. Rev.195, 203 (1994).Google Scholar

Enson, Eric P., Comment, A Roadblock on the Detour Around the First Amendment: Is the Enforcement of English Libel Judgments in the United States Unconstitutional?, 21 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev.159, 160 (1999).Google Scholar

Maltby, Jeremy, Note, Juggling Comity and Self-Government: The Enforcement of Foreign Libel Judgments in U.S. Courts, 94 Colum. L. Rev.1978, 1995–6 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stern, Craig A., Foreign Judgments and the Freedom of Speech: Look Who's Talking, 60 Brooklyn L. Rev.999, 1033–34 (1994).Google Scholar

Youm, Kyu Ho, Suing American Media in Foreign Courts: Doing an End-Run Around U.S. Libel Law?, 16 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J.235, 256–62 (1994).Google Scholar

Biddinger, Brian P., Note: Limiting the Business Method Patents: A Comparative and Proposed Alignment of European, Japanese, and United States Patent Law, 69 Fordham L. Rev.2523, 2543 (2001).Google Scholar

Bradley, Curtis A., Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Intellectual Property Law – Principal Paper: Territorial Intellectual Property Rights in an Age of Globalism, 37 Va. J. Int'l L.505 (1997).Google Scholar

Cuenot, Kevin, Perilous Potholes in the Path Toward Patent Law Harmonization, 11 J. Law. & Pub. Pol'y101 (1999).Google Scholar

DeCluitt, Christopher D., International Patent Prosecution, Litigation and Enforcement, 5 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L.135 (1997).Google Scholar

Rochelle C. Dreyfuss & Jane C. Ginsburg, A Standalone Treaty on Jurisdiction and Recognition of Judgments in Intellectual Property Matters, presented at Chicago-Kent Symposium on Constructing International Intellectual Property Law: The Role of National Courts, October 19, 2001 [hereinafter Draft IP Treaty], available at: http://www.kentlaw.edu/depts/ipp/intl-courts/materials.html (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Kalikow, Martin, Multi-Country Patent Litigation: Strategy and Administration of Multi-Country Patent Litigation, in International Patent Litigation: A Country-by-Country Analysis (Meller, Michael N. ed., BNA Books, 1994).Google Scholar

Thomas, John R., Litigation Beyond the Technological Frontier: Comparative Approaches to Multinational Patent Enforcement, 27 Law & Pol'y Int'l Bus.277, 277 (1996).Google Scholar

Van, Dick C. J. A.Engelen, Intellectual Property Issues in Cross-Border Transactions, 5 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L.135 (1997).Google Scholar

Berman, Paul Schiff, The Globalization of Jurisdiction, 151 U. Pa. L. Rev.311, 389 n.305, 519–21 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Martin, Time to Change the Federal Forum Non Conveniens Analysis, 77 Tul. L. Rev.309, 381 (2002).Google Scholar

Karayanni, Michael M., The Myth and Reality of a Controversy: “Public Factors” and the Forum Non Conveniens Doctrine, 21 Wis. Int'l L.J.327, 330, 379 (2003).Google Scholar

Peterson, Courtland H., Choice of Law and Forum Clauses and the Recognition of Foreign Judgments Revisited Through Lloyd's of London Cases, 60 La. L. Rev.1259 (2000).Google Scholar

Courtland H. Peterson, Limits on the Enforcement of Foreign Country Judgments and Choice of Law and Forum Clauses, Law and Justice in a Multistate World (James A. R. Nafziger & Symeon C. Symeonides eds., Transnational, 2002)

Waples, Megan, Note, The Adequate Alternative Forum Analysis in Forum Non Conveniens: A Case for Reform, 36 Conn. L. Rev.1475, 1484–5 (2004).Google Scholar

Wilson, John R., Note, Coming to America to File Suit: Foreign Plaintiffs and the Forum Non Conveniens Barrier in Transnational Litigation, 65 Ohio St. L.J.659, 684–90 (2004).Google Scholar

Casad, Robert C., Intersystem Issue Preclusion and the Restatement (Second) of Judgments, 66 Cornell L. Rev.510, 513–14 (1981).Google Scholar

Casad, Robert C., Issue Preclusion and Foreign Country Judgments Whose Law?, 70 Iowa L. Rev.53, 79 (1984).Google Scholar

Peterson, Professor, Res Judicata and Foreign Country Judgments, 24 Ohio St. L.J.291 (1963).Google Scholar

Smit, Hans, International Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel in the United States, 9 Ucla L. Rev.44 (1962).Google Scholar

Vestal, Allan D., Preclusion/Res Judicata Variables: Adjudicating Bodies, 54 Geo. L.J.857, 869–73 (1966).Google Scholar

Miller, Katherine R., Playground Politics: Assessiing the Wisdom of Writing a Reciprocity Requirement into U.S. International Recognition and Enforcement Law, 35 Geo. J. Int'l L.239 (2004).Google Scholar

Teitz, Louise Ellen, Developments in Parallel Proceedings: The Globalization of Procedural Responses, 38 Int'l Law.303 (2004).Google Scholar

Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 124 S. Ct. 2739, 2754, 2762 (2004) [Sources of Law]

Semtek International, Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, 531 U.S. 497 (2001) [Full Faith & Credit; Res Judicata]

Missouri v. Holland, 252 U.S. 416 (1920).[Supremacy Clause].

The Antelope, 23 U.S. (10 Wheat.) 66, 123 (1825) [Conflicts of Law]

Matusevitch v. Telnikoff, 159 F.3d 636 (D.C. 1998) [Public Policy]

Baker Marine (Nigeria) Ltd. v. Chevron (Nigeria) Ltd., 191 F.3d 194 (2d Cir. 1999) [Enforcement of Arbitration Awards]

Success Motivation Inst. of Japan, Ltd. v. Success Motivation Inst. Inc., 966 F.2d 1007, 1008 (5th Cir. 1992) [Choice of Law]

Banque Libanaise Pour Le Commerce v. Khreich, 915 F.2d 1000, 1003 (5th Cir. 1990) [Choice of Law]

Zorgias v. SS Hellenic Star and Hellenic Lines Ltd., 487 F.2d 519, 519 (5th Cir. 1973) [Res Judicata]

Spinozzi v. ITT Sheraton Corp., 174 F.3d 842 (7th Cir. 1999) [Choice of Law]

Posner v. Essex Insurance Company, Ltd., 178 F.3d 1209, 1222 (11th Cir. 1999) [Comity Doctrine; International Abstention]

Turner Entertainment Co. v. Degeto Films GmbH, 25 F.3d 1512, 1519 (11th Cir. 1994) [Comity Doctrine]

Yahoo! v. La Ligue Contre le Racisme et L'Antisemitisme, 169 F. Supp. 2d 1181 (N.D. Cal. 2001) [Comity Doctrine]

Films by Jove, Inc. v. Berov, 250 F. Supp. 2d 158 (E.D.N.Y. 2003) [Comity Doctrine]

S. C. Chimexim S. A. v. Velco Enterprises Ltd., 36 F. Supp. 2d 206, 212 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) [Comity Doctrine]

Voreep v. Tarom Romanian Air Transport, 1999 WL 311811 (S.D.N.Y. May 18, 1999) [Comity Doctrine; Res Judicata]

Hilton v. Guyot, 159 U.S. 113 (1894) [Comity Doctrine]

Philips Electronics, N.V. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co., 692 N.E.2d 1268 (Ill. App. 1998) [Choice of Law]

Manches & Co. v. Gilbey, 646 N.E.2d 86 (Mass. 1995) [Currency of Award]

Kam-Tech Systems Limited v. Yardeni, 340 N.J. Super. 414, 774 A.2d 644 (2001) [Full Faith & Credit]

Neporany v. Kir, 5 A.D.2d 438 (N.Y. App. Div.1958) [Comity Doctrine]

Bachchan v. Indian Abroad Publications, 154 Misc.2d 228, 585 N.Y.S.2d 661 (1992) [Due Process; Public Policy; Choice of Law]

CIBC Mellon Trust Co. v. Mora Hotel, 100 N.Y.2d 215, 792 N.E.2d 155 (N.Y. 2003) [Comity Doctrine]

Watts v. Swiss Bank Corporation, 27 N.Y.2d 270, 317 N.Y.S.2d 315, 265 N.E.2d 739 (1970) [Comity Doctrine; Res Judicata]

Red Fox v. Hatttich, 494 N.W.2d 638, 641 (S.D. 1993) [Comity Doctrine regarding Indian Tribes]

Mori v. Mori, 896 P.2d 1237, 1240 (Utah Ct. App. 1995) [Full Faith & Credit]

Full Faith and Credit Clause, Art. IV, Section 1, The U.S. Constitution

Interstate Family Support Act and the federal International Child Support Enforcement Act, 42 U.S.C. § 659a (1996)

Martindale-Hubbell Massachusetts Law Digest Civil Action & Procedure (1999)

Martindale-Hubbell North Carolina Law Digest Civil Actions & Procedures (1999)

Martindale-Hubbell Ohio Law Digest Civil Actions & Procedures (1999)

Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 481 (1986)

Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States, §482(2)(d) (1986)

Restatement Third of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 483 (1986)

The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL). Seehttp://nccusl.org (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL). Annual Meeting information, available at: http://nccusl.org/Update/Annual_Meeting_2005/AnnMtg05_Drafts.htm (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL). Drafting Committee update, available at: http://nccusl.org/Update/CommitteeSearchResults.aspx?committee=92 (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws Legislative Fact Sheet, available at: http://www.nccusl.org/nccusl/DesktopDefault.aspx?tabindex=0&tabid=1

U.S. Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 201–08, ch. 2, implementing the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

U.S. Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 301–07, ch. 3, implementing the Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration

Comment to §4, Uniform Foreign Money-Judgment Recognition Act (1962)

Harvard Draft Convention on the International Responsibility of States for Injuries to Aliens, Art. 10(3), reprinted in R. R. Baxter & Louis B. Sohn, Responsibility of States for Injuries to the Economic Interests of Aliens, 55 AJIL 545, 553 (1961)

Meeting Draft of Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act (200_) (March, 2005). Seehttp://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/ulc/ufmjra/2005annmtgdraft.htm (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Meeting Draft of Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act (200_) (July 22–29, 2005)

Reporters' Notes in Redline Draft of Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act (200_) (March, 2005)

Reporters' Notes in Redline Draft of Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act (200_) (July 22–29, 2005)

Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, § 1 (1964)

Brand, Ronald A., Enforcement of Foreign Money-Judgments in the United States: In Search of Uniformity and International Acceptance, 67 Notre Dame L. Rev.253, 275 (1991).Google Scholar

Carl, B.Recognition of Texas Judgments in Courts of Foreign Nations – and Vice Versa, 13 Hous. L. Rev.680 (1976).Google Scholar

Kulzer, Barbara, Recognition of Foreign Country Judgment in New York: The Uniform Foreign Money-Judgments Recognition Act, 18 Buffalo L. Rev.1, 32 (1968).Google Scholar

Panitch, Leo, Rethinking the Role of the State, in Globalization: Critical Reflections 83, 96–7 (Mittelman, James H. ed., Lynne Reinner-Publishers, 1996).Google Scholar

Scoles, Eugene F. & Aarnas, Laila E., The Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Nation Judgments: California, Oregon, and Washington, 57 Or. L. Rev. 377 (1978).Google Scholar

Mehren, Arthur T. & Patterson, Michael E., Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign-Country Judgments in the United States, 6 Law & Pol'y Int'l Bus.37 (1974).Google Scholar

Mehren, Arthur T. & Donald Trautman, , Recognition of Foreign Adjudications: A Survey and a Suggested Approach, 81 Harv. L. Rev.1601 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wakefield, Wanda Ellen, Annotation, Judgment of Court of Foreign Country as Entitled to Enforcement or Extraterritorial Effect in State Court, 13 A.L.R. 4th 1109 (1998).Google Scholar

Comment, Conflict of Laws – Recognition of Judgments – Federal Courts Are to Apply State Laws on Recognition of Foreign Judgments, 8 Tex. Int'l L.J.247, 253 (1973).

Ely, Hart, Choice of Law and the State's Interest in Protecting its Own, 23 Wm. & Mary L. Rev.173 (1981).Google Scholar

Peterson, Professor, Foreign Country Judgments and the Second Restatement of Conflict of Laws, 72 Colum. L. Rev.220 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scoles, Eugene F., Interstate and International Distinctions in the Conflict of Laws in the United States, 54 Calif. L. Rev.1599, 1605–07 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Troutman, Donald P., Toward Federalizing Choice of Law, 70 Tex. L. Rev.1715, 1736 n.95 (1992).Google Scholar

Society of Lloyd's v. Ashenden, 233 F.3d 473 (7th Cir. 2000) [Due Process]

Society of Lloyd's v. Turner, 303 F.3d 325 (5th Cir. 2002) [Public Policy]

Southwest Livestock & Trucking Co., Inc. v. Ramon, 169 F.3d 317 (5th Cir. 1999) [Public Policy]

Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Hoffman, 665 F. Supp 73 (D. Mass. 1987) [Choice of Law]

Bridgeway Corp. v. Citibank, 45 F. Supp. 2d 276, 285 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) [Due Process]

S. C. Chimexim S. A. v. Velco Enterprises, Ltd., 36 F. Supp. 2d 206, 212 (S.D.N.Y. 1999) [Comity Doctrine]

Eagle Leasing v. Amandus, 476 N.W.2d 35 (S.Ct. Iowa 1991) [Personal Jurisdiction]

Wolff v. Wolff, 389 A.2d 413 (My. App. 1978) [Personal Jurisdiction]

Day v. Montana Dept. of Social & Rehab. Servs., 900 P.2d 296 (Mont. 1995) [Full Faith & Credit for Child Support Orders]

Kam-Tech Systems, Ltd. v. Yardeni, 74 A.2d 644, 649 (N.J. App. 2001) [Full Faith & Credit]

CIBC Mellon Trust Co. v. Mora Hotel Corp., N.V., 743 N.Y.S.2d 408, 415 (N.Y. App. 2002) [Comity Doctrine]

Bachchan v. India Abroad Publications, Inc., 585 N.Y.S.2d 661 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1992) [Due Process, Public Policy; Choice of Law]

Johnston v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 242 N.Y. 381 (1926) [Reciprocity – Full Faith and Credit]

Fredericks v. Eide-Kirschmann Ford, 462 N.W.2d 164, 170 (N.D. 1990) [Comity on Tribal Court Judgment]

Hunt v. BP Exploration Co. (Libya) Ltd., 492 F. Supp. 885, 901 (N.D. Tex. 1980) [Res Judicata & Collateral Estoppel]

The Courage Co. LLC v. The ChemShare Corp., 93 S.W.3d 323, 331 (Tex. App. 2002) [Arbitration Contractual Provision]

Mayekawa Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Sasaki, 888 P.2d 183, 189 (Wash. App. 1995) [Comity Doctrine]

Administration Works on Investment Position for Singapore FTA, Inside U.S. Trade, Dec. 15, 2000

Anderson, Chandler P., The Extent and Limitations of the Treaty-Making Power Under the Constitution, 1 A.J.I.L.636, 648 (1907).Google Scholar

Bergmann, Mark S., Bilateral Investment Protection Treaties: An Examination of the Evolution and Significance of the U.S. Prototype Treaty, 16 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol.1 (1983).Google Scholar

Bhala, Raj, The Myth About Stare Decisis and International Trade Law, 14 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev.845, 849 (1999).Google Scholar

Boyd, Stewart C., Interest for the Late Payment of Money, 1 Arb. Int'l153 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Branson, David J. & Wallace, Richard E. Jr., Awarding Interest in International Commercial Arbitration: Establishing a Uniform Approach, 28 Va. J. Int'l L.919 (1988).Google Scholar

Cerina, Paolo, Interest as Damages in International Commercial Arbitration, 4 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb.255 (1993).Google Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon, A Bridge Too Far: The Fall of the Fifth WTO Ministerial Conference in Cancun and the Future of Trade Constitution, 7 J. Int'l Econ. L. 219 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clodfelter, Mark, U.S. State Department Participation in International Economic Dispute Resolution, 42 S. Tex. L. Rev.1273, 1283 (2001).Google Scholar

Compare Trade in Services and E-Commerce: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection of the House Energy and Commerce Comm., 108th Cong. 3 (2003)

Friedman, Mark & Verhoosel, Gaetan, Arbitrating over BIT Claims; Under Bilateral Investment Treaties, More Investors Are Taking Action Against Foreign States, 26 Nat'l L.J.15, 17 (2003).Google Scholar

Gotanda, John Y., Awarding Interest in International Arbitration, 90 Am. J. Int'l L.40 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Don Henry, Editorial, “Free-Trade Clause Would Be a Dangerous Weakening of the Law,” Sydney Morning Herald, Oct. 27, 2003, at 2003 WL 66059983

Hudec, Robert E., Circumventing Democracy: The Political Morality of Trade Negotiations, 25 N.Y.U.J. Int'l L. & Pol.311 (1993).Google Scholar

Hunter, Martin & Triebel, Volker, Awarding Interest in International Arbitration – Some Observations Based on a Comparative Study of the Laws of England and Germany, 6(1) J. Int'l Arb.7 (1989).Google Scholar

John H. Jackson, The Effect of Treaties in Domestic Law in the United States, in The Jurisprudence of Gatt & the WTO 297 (2000)

Kunzer, Kathleen, Developing a Model Bilateral Investment Treaty, 15 L. & Pol'y Int'l Bus.273 (1983).Google Scholar

Julian D. M. Lew, Interest on Money Awards in International Arbitration, in Making Commercial Law: Essays in Honour of Roy Goode 543 (Ross Cranston ed., 1997)

F. A. Mann, Further Studies in International Law 234, 238 (1990)

Mayer, Pierre, Mandatory Rules of Law in International Arbitration 2 Arb. Int'l274, 281 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moses, Margaret L., Vacatur or Non-enforcement of International Commercial Arbitration: A Dual System of Judicial Control (unpublished manuscript, on file with author).

Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), available at: http://www.pca-cpa.org (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Schneiderman, David, Investment Rules and the New Constitutionalism, 25 Law & Soc. Inquiry757, 771 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smit, Hans, Substance and Procedure in International Arbitration: The Development of a New Legal Order, 65 Tulane L. Rev.1309, 1310–11 (1991).Google Scholar

M. Sornarajah, The International Law on Foreign Investment 299 (1994)

USTR Information on U.S. Trade Agreements, available at http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Section_Index.html (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

USTR Web site, available at http://www.ustr.gov (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Voser, Nathalie, Mandatory Rules of Law as a Limitation on the Law Applicable in International Commercial Arbitration, 7 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb.319 (1997).Google Scholar

Wright, Laura L., Trade Promotion Authority: Fast Track for the Twenty-First Century? 12 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 979 (2004).

Quincy Wright, The United States and International Agreements, 38 A.J.I.L. 341, 348, 355 (1944)

Robert B. Zoellick, “Our Credo: Free Trade and Competition,” Wall Street Journal July 10, 2003

134 Cong. Rec. H6611–02 (daily ed. Aug. 9, 1988)

139 Cong. Rec. H9875–01 (daily ed. Nov. 17, 1993)

Article 1 of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Draft Convention on the Protection of Foreign Property, 7 I.L.M. 117, 119 (1968)

Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, June 10, 1958, 21 U.S.T. 2517, 330 U.N.T.S. 3

Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States, Mar. 18, 1965, 17 U.S.T. 1270, 575 U.N.T.S. 159

Letter from Benjamin A. Gilman, Chairman, House Committee on International Relations, to Sir Leon Brittan, Vice President, The European Commission (Jan. 8, 1999) in Inside U.S. Trade (Jan. 22, 1999)

The Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States, opened for signature, 17 U.S.T. 1270, 575 U.N.T.S. 159 (Mar. 18, 1965)

The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes also maintains documentation on the cases arbitrated under its auspices, at http://www.worldbank.org/icsid/ (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

U.S. Bilateral Investment Treaties, available at: http://www.tcc.mac.doc.gov/cgi-bin/doit.cgi?219:64:d5c333fdc357d3df07e119f1bf7aa0a6f42c164ff5d2bf29e8e65dde9058144b:0:TOVR!-!Bilateral%20Investment%20Treaties!-!QuickLink!-!BILATERAL (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

U.S. Dep't of State Advisory Comm. on International Economic Policy (ACIEP), Report Regarding the Draft Model Bilateral Investment Treaty 2–3 (Jan. 30, 2004), available at http://www.ciel.org/ (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

U.S. Dep't of State Press Release on U.S. Bilateral Investment Treaty Program (July 1, 2003), available at http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/fs/22422.htm (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations, Bilateral Investment Treaties, 41–4 (1988)

UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), available at http://www.uncitral.org (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, May 23, 1969, 1155 U.N.T.S. 331, reprinted in 8 I.L.M. 679 (1969)

American Arbitration Association (AAA) Rules, Art. 29(2)

Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act, 19 U.S.C. § 3802(b)(3) (Supp.2002)

Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2002. Compare 19 U.S.C.S. §2903(b) (2004) with 19 U.S.C.S. § 3803 (2004)

Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Apr. 15, 1994, Legal Instruments – Results of the Uruguay Round; 33 I.L.M. 1140 (1994)

General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Oct. 30, 1947, 61 Stat. A-11, T.I.A.S. No. l700, 55 U.N.T.S. l87

Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre Rules, Art. 33

ICC Rules, Art. 17(1) (1998)

Int'l Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, ICSID Additional Facility Rules art. 53(3) (2003), available at: http://www.worldbank.org/icsid/facility/facility.htm (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law § 712, cmt. g (1987)

Trade Act of 1974, Section 301, 19 U.S.C. §§ 2411–2420 (1994)

Senate Report on the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Act of 2002, Feb. 28, 2002, at 107 Cong., 2d Sess

Statute of the International Court of Justice, June 26, 1945, Art. 38, 59 Stat. 1055, 1058

Super 301 of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, 19 U.S.C. §2420 (A)(1)(a)-(b) (1994)

U.N. Commission on Int'l Trade Law, UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, Art. 32(5) (1976), available at: http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.arbitration.rules.1976/32 (last visited Aug 15, 2005)

UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, Art. 33; UNCITRAL Model Law, Art. 28; International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Rules, Art. 13(5)

UNCITRAL Model Law (U.N. Doc A/40.17 Annex 1 as Adopted by the UN Commission on International Trade Law on June 21, 1985)

Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, April 15, 1994, Art. 17(6), Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 2, The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts 404, 418 (1994), reprinted in 33 I.L.M. 1226, 1236 (1994)

United Nations Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, Art. 2, 14 I.L.M.254 (1975)

Abbott, Frederick M., NAFTA and the Legalization of World Politics: A Case Study, in Legalization and World Politics 135, 149, 158 (Goldstein, Judith L. et al., eds., Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Abbott, Frederick M., Integration Without Institutions: The NAFTA Mutation of the EC Model and the Future of the GATT Regime, 40 Am. J. Comp. L.917 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, Frederick M., The North American Free Trade Agreement and Its Implications for the European Union, 4 Transnat'l L. & Contemp. Probs. 119 (1994).Google Scholar

Frederick M. Abbott, The North American Integration Regime and Its Implications for the World Trading System, in The EU, the WTO, and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of International Trade? 169, 170 (J. H. H. Weiler ed., 2000)

Bruce Ackerman & David Golove, Is NAFTA Constitutional? (1995)

Edward Alden, “Canada Seeks Tighter NAFTA rules to Limit Compensation”, Fin. Times (London), Jan. 22, 1999

Barry Appleton, Navigating NAFTA: A Concise User's Guide to the North American Free Trade Agreement 169 (Carswell Legal Publications, 1994)

Stefan Baumgarten, “Canadian Group to Fight Methanex on NAFTA MTBE Spat,” Chem. News & Intelligence, Feb. 4, 2004

Been, Vicki & Beauvais, Joel C., The Global Fifth Amendment? NAFTA's Investment Protections and the Misguided Quest for an International “Regulatory Takings” Doctrine, 78 N.Y.U. L. Rev.30, 88–100 (2003).Google Scholar

Brower, Charles N. & Steven, Lee A., Who Then Should Judge?: Developing the International Rule of Law Under NAFTA Chapter 11, 2 Chi. J. Int'l L.193 (2001).Google Scholar

Canada Appeals NAFTA Chapter 11 Case, Arguing That Panel Exceeded Its Jurisdiction, 18 Int'L Trade Rep. 273 (BNA, Feb. 15, 2001)

Canada Seeks NAFTA Chapter 11, Improvements, Trade Minister Marchi Says, 16 Int'l Trade Rep. 1634 (BNA, Oct. 13, 1999)

Canada-United States: Free-Trade Agreement, Jan. 2, 1988, 27 I.L.M. 281 (1988)

Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, available at: http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/tna-nac/gov-en.asp (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Cannon, James R. Jr., Resolving Disputes Under NAFTA Chapter 19 (Shepard's McGraw-Hill, 1994).Google Scholar

Chrush, Michael J., Note, The North American Free Trade Agreement: Reasons for Passage and Requirements to Be a Foreign Legal Consultant in a NAFTA Country, 3 I.L.S.A. J. Int'l Comp. L.177, 178 (1996).Google Scholar

Dep't of External Affairs, “North American Free Trade Agreement: Canadian Statement on Implementation,” Canada Gazette, Jan. 1, 1994

Dodge, William S., Case Report: Waste Management, Inc. v. Mexico, 95 A.J.I.L.186, 191–92 (2001).Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, John P., The Future of the North American Free Trade Agreement: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Regional Economic Institutions and the Harmonizaton of Law in North America and Western Europe, 19 Hous. J. Int'l L.1 (1996).Google Scholar

Free Trade Commission Clarifications Related to NAFTA Chapter 11 (July 31, 2001), available at: http://www.ustr.gov/regions/whemisphere/

Free Trade Commission, Statement of the Free Trade Commission on Non-Disputing Party Participation, available at: http://www.ustr.gov/regions/whemisphere/nafta2003/statement-nondisputingparties.pdf

“Full Slate of Negotiations Underway on Chile's Entry to NAFTA,” Inside U.S. Trade, Jul. 28, 1995

Gal-Or, Noemi, Private Party Direct Access: A Comparison of the NAFTA and the EU Disciplines, 21 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev.1, 6–7 (1998).Google Scholar

Godshall, Lauren E., Student Article, In the Cold Shadow of Metalclad: The Potential for Change to NAFTA's Chapter Eleven, 11 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 264 (2002).Google Scholar

Johnson, Pierre Marc & Beaulieu, Andre, The Environment and NAFTA: Understanding and Implementing the New Continental Law 117–18 (Island Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Legum, Barton, The Innovation of Investor-State Arbitration Under NAFTA, 43 Harv. Int'l L.J.531, 538–9 (2002).Google Scholar

Loewen Group v. United States, Decision on Hearing of Respondent's Objection to Competence and Jurisdiction, paras. 25–6, 28 (NAFTA Ch. 11 Arb. Trib. Jan. 9, 2001) (discussing the tribunal's September 1999 and June 2000 orders on confidentiality)

Lopez, David, Dispute Resolution Under NAFTA: Lessons from the Early Experience, 32 Tex. Int'l L.J.163 (1997).Google Scholar

Daniel Magraw, NAFTA & the Environment: Substance & Process, in NAFTA & the Environment: Substance & Process 1, 23 (Daniel Magraw ed., 1995)

Howard Mann, First North American Symposium on Understanding the Linkage Between Trade and the Environment: Assessing the Impact of NAFTA on Environmental Law and Management Processes 25 (2000), available at: http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2001/trade mann final.pdf

Manyasz, Peter, Regulatory Chill of NAFTA Chapter 11 to Be Avoided in FTAA, Lawyer Warns, 18 Int'l Trade Rep.626 (2001).Google Scholar

Metropoulos, Demetrios G., Constitutional Dimensions of the North American Free Trade Agreement, 27 Cornell Int'l L.J.141, 145–6 (1994).Google Scholar

NAFTA Free Trade Commission, Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions, Part B (July 31, 2001), available at: http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/tna-nac/gov-en.asp

NAFTA Implementation Act, Pub. L. No. 103–82, 401–08, 411, 107 Stat.2057, 2129 (codified as amended at 19 U.S.C. 3431-3438, 1516a (1994))

NAFTA claims, available at: http://www.naftalaw.org (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

News Release, Methanex Corp., Methanex Seeks Damages Under NAFTA for California MTBE Ban (June 15, 1999), available at: http://www.methanex.com/investorcentre/newsreleases/nafta.pdf

North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation, Sept. 8, 9, 12, & 14, 1993, Can.-Mex.-U.S., 32 I.L.M. 1480

North American Free Trade Agreement, Annex 1901.2, Dec. 17, 1992, U.S.-Can.-Mex., 32 I.L.M. 605 (1993)

North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, Pub. L. No. 103–82, 107 Stat. 2057 (1993)

Daniel Q. Posin, The Multi-Faceted Investment Arbitration Rules of NAFTA, 13 World Arb. & Mediation Rep. 13, 15 (2002)

Press Release, Int'l Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, United Parcel Service of American, Inc. v. Government of Canada NAFTA/UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules Proceeding (Jul. 25, 2002)

Daniel M. Price & P. Bryan Christy, III, An Overview of the NAFTA Investment Chapter: Substantive Rules and Investor-State Dispute Settlement, in The North American Free Trade Agreement: A New Frontier in International Trade and Investment in the Americas 174 (Judith H. Bello et al., eds., ABA Section of International Laws, 1994)

Response of Respondent United States of America to Methanex's Submission Concerning the NAFTA Free Trade Commission's July 31, 2001 Interpretation, Oct. 26, 2001, available at: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/6028.pdf

Strazzeri, Joseph A., Note, A Lucas Analysis of Regulatory Expropriations Under NAFTA Chapter Eleven, 14 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev.837, 846 (2002).Google Scholar

Swan, Alan C., Case Report: Ethyl Corporation v. Canada: Award on Jurisdiction (Under NAFTA/UNCITRAL), 94 A.J.I.L.159 (2000).Google Scholar

Thomas, J. C. & Ayllon, Sergio Lopez, NAFTA Dispute Settlement and Mexico: Interpreting Treaties and Reconciling Common and Civil Law Systems in a Free Trade Area, 33 Can. Y.B. Int'l L.75 (1995).Google Scholar

Tollefson, Chris, Metalclad v. United Mexican States Revisited: Judicial Oversight of NAFTA's Chapter Eleven Investor-State Claim Process, 11 Minn. J. Global Trade183, 226–7 (2002).Google Scholar

Uruguay Round Agreements Act, Pub. L. No. 103–465, 108 Stat. 4809 (1994)

USTR NAFTA information, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Regional/NAFTA/Section_Index.html (last visited Mar. 23, 2005)

Valihora, Michael S., NAFTA Chapter 19 or the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body: A Hobson's Choice for Canada?, 30 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 447 (1998).Google Scholar

Yee, Marisa, The Future of Environmental Regulation After Article 1110 of NAFTA: A Look at the Methanex and Metalclad Cases, 9 Hastings W.-NW. J. Envtl. L. & Pol'y85, 89 (2002).Google Scholar

Zamora, Stephen, NAFTA and the Harmonization of Domestic Legal Systems: The Side Effects of Free Trade, 12 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L.401, 406–08 (1995).Google Scholar

Exchange of Letters on Implementation of the U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Australia_FTA/Implementation/Section_Index.html (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Final Text of the Australian FTA, available at: http://ustr.gov/assets/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Australia_FTA/Final_Text/asset_upload_file148_5168.pdf (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Transcript of U.S.-Australia FTA Signing, U.S. Trade Representative Robert B. Zoellick, May 18, 2004, available at: http://ustr.gov/assets/Document_Library/Transcripts/2004/May/asset_upload_file697_3379.pdf (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

United States-Australia Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, Pub. L. No.108–286, § 2, 118 Stat. 919 (2004) Jul. 15, 2004 (to be codified at 19 U.S.C. § 3805 note)

U.S.-Australia FTA Quotes of Support, Jul. 15, 2004, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Australia_FTA/U.S.-Australia_FTA_Quotes_of_Support.html

USDA Fact Sheet on the United States and Australian Free Trade Agreement, available at: http://www.fas.usda.gov/itp/Australia/us-auscommodityfactsheets.html (last visited Aug. 15, 2005).

USTR Australian FTA information, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Australia_FTA/Section_Index.html (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Andean FTA Federal Register Notices, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Andean_FTA/Andean_FTA_Federal_Register_Notices/Section_Index.html (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Interim Environmental Review U.S.-Andean Free Trade Agreement, February 2005, available at: http://ustr.gov/assets/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Andean_FTA/asset_upload_file27_7305.pdf (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Press Release, USTR Notifies Congress of Intent to Initiate Free Trade Talks with Andean Countries. 11/18/2003. Available at: http://ustr.gov/Document_Library/Press_Releases/2003/November/USTR_Notifies_Congress_of_Intent_to_Initiate_Free_Trade_Talks_with_ Andean_Countries.html (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Treaty with Argentina Concerning the Reciprocal Encouragement and Protection of Investment, Nov. 14, 1991, U.S.-Arg., Art. IV(1), S. Treaty Doc. No. 103–2

USTR Andean FTA information, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Andean_FTA/Section_Index.html (last visited Mar. 23, 2006)

Center for International Environmental Law, Comments on the Chile and Singapore Free Trade Agreements (2003), available at: http://www.citizenstrade.org/pdf/chile-sing_ciel.pdf (last vistited Mar. 23, 2006)

“Chile FTA Labor, Environment Measures in Doubt with Bush Administration Bilateral Negotiations – Chile and U.S. Officially Launch Negotiations on Free Trade Pact,” Inside U.S. Trade, Dec. 15, 2000

“Chilean Minister Presses Pre-Fast Track Bilateral U.S. Trade Talks,” Inside U.S. Trade, Aug. 13, 1999

Final Text of the Chile FTA, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Chile_FTA/Final_Texts/Section_Index.html

Langman, James, Chilean Lawmaker Says Free Trade Accord with U.S. Unconstitutional, Plans Challenge, 26 Int'l Env't Rep.1100 (2003).Google Scholar

Miller, Melissa Ann, Note, Will the Circle Be Unbroken? Chile's Accession to the NAFTA and the Fast-Track Debate, 31 Val. U.L. Rev.153, 178–9 (1996).Google Scholar

Press Release, Office of the United States Trade Representative, U.S. and Chile Conclude Historic Free Trade Agreement (Dec. 11, 2002)

Christopher S. Rugaber, Chile, Singapore Draft Legislation Approved by House, Senate Panels, Daily Rep. for Executives (BNA), July 11, 2003

Tratado de Libre Comercio entre el Gobierno de la Republica de Chile y el Gobierno de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, Oct. 1, 1998

United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, H.R. Rep. No.108–224, pt. I, at 2 (2003).

USTR Chile FTA information, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Chile_FTA/Section_Index.html (last visited Mar. 23, 2006)

Center for International Environmental Law, Comments on the Chile and Singapore Free Trade Agreements (2003), available at http://www.citizenstrade.org/pdf/chile sing ciel.pdf (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Christopher S. Rugaber, Chile, Singapore Draft Legislation Approved by House, Senate Panels, Daily Rep. for Executives (BNA), July 11, 2003

“Congress, Business Surprised by Singapore FTA Announcement,” Inside U.S. Trade, Nov. 24, 2000

Final Text of the Singapore FTA, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Singapore_FTA/Final_Texts/Section_Index.html (last visited Mar. 23, 2006)

Press Release, President Signed U.S.-Singapore Free Trade Agreement, May, 2003, available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/05/20030506–11.html (last visited Mar. 23, 2006)

TPA and Advisor Reports for the Singapore FTA, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Singapore_FTA/Reports/Section_Index.html (last visited Mar. 23, 2006)

“U.S. Completes Deal with Singapore on Capital Controls, Freeing FTA,”Inside U.S. Trade, Jan. 17, 2003

U.S. Dept. of State, Background Note: Singapore (detailing how Singapore has acted as a beneficial trade partner and political ally to the United States), available at: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2798htm (last visited Mar. 23, 2006)

USTR Singapore FTA information, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Singapore_FTA/Section_Index.html (last visited Mar. 23, 2006)

Free Trade Area of the Americas, First Summit of the Americas Declaration of Miami, December 19–21, 1994, available at: http://www.ftaa-alca.org/Summits/Miami/declara e.asp (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Free Trade Area of the Americas, Ministerials, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Regional/FTAA/FTAA_Ministerials/Section_Index.html (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Free Trade Area of the Americas, Negotiating Team, available at: http://ustr.gov/assets/Trade_Agreements/Regional/FTAA/asset_upload_file791_3678.pdf (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Free Trade Area of the Americas, Official Reports, available at: http://www.ftaa-alca.org/SPCOMM/COMMCS_E.ASP#pubs (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Free Trade Area of the Americas, Second Draft Agreement, available at: http://www.ftaa-alca.org/ftaadraft02/drafte.asp (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Free Trade Area of the Americas, Third Draft Agreement, available at: http://www.ftaa-alca.org/FTAADraft03/Indexe.asp (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Opinion of the Inter-America Juridical Committee on Resolution AG/DOC. 3375/96 Freedom of Trade and Investment in the Hemisphere, OEA/ser. G/CP, doc. 2803/96, paras. 5, 6 (Aug. 23, 1996), available in 35 I.L.M. 1322 (1996).

Press Release, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, USTR Zoellick Says Publication of Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) Text Will Help Explain Trade Benefits (July, 3, 2001)

Final Environmental Review of the Agreement on the Establishment of a Free Trade Area Between the Government of the United States and the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, November 18, 1999, available at: http://ustr.gov/assets/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Jordan/asset_upload_file64_5111.pdf (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Final Text of the Jordan FTA, available at: http://ustr.gov/assets/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Jordan/asset_upload_file250_5112.pdf (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

USTR Jordan FTA information, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Jordan/Section_Index.html (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Background Information on the United States-Israel Free Trade Area (FTA) Agreement, available at: http://www.itds.treas.gov/us-israel.html (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Final Text of the Israel FTA, available at: http://www.mac.doc.gov/tcc/data/commerce_html/TCC_Documents/IsraelFreeTrade.html (last visited Mar. 24, 2006).

USTR Israel FTA information, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Israel/Section_Index.html (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Letter from the USTR, USTR Notifies Congress Administration Intends to Initiate Free Trade Negotiations with Sub-Saharan Nations, 11/05/2, available at: http://ustr.gov/Document_Library/Letters_to_Congress/2002/USTR_Notifies_Congress_Administration_Intends_to_Initiate_Free_Trade_Negotiations_with_Sub-Saharan_Nations.html (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Letter from the USTR, USTR Notifies Congress Administration Intends to Initiate Free Trade Negotiations with Sub-Saharan Nations – House Letter, 11/05/02, available at: http://ustr.gov/Document_Library/Letters_to_Congress/2002/USTR_Notifies_Congress_Administration_Intends_to_Initiate_Free_Trade_Negotiations_with_Sub-Saharan_Nations_–_House_Letter.html (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Press Release, U.S. and Southern African Nations Plan for Upcoming FTA Negotiations, 1/13/03, available at: http://ustr.gov/Document_Library/Press_Releases/2003/January/U.S._Southern_African_Nations_Plan_for_Upcoming_FTA_Negotiations.html?ht= (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

USTR Southern Africa FTA information, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Southern_Africa_FTA/Background_Information_on_the_U.S.-SACU_FTA.html (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Final text of the Morocco FTA, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Morocco_FTA/FInal_Text/Section_Index.html (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Informational Web site on the United States and Morocco Free Trade Agreement, available at: http://www.moroccousafta.com/index_ang.htm (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Press Releases for the Morocco FTA, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Morocco_FTA/Press_Releases/Section_Index.html (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Transcripts of the Morocco FTA, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Morocco_FTA/Transcripts/Section_Index.html (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, Pub. L. No.108–302, 118 Stat. 1103 (2004) (to be codified at 19 U.S.C. § 3805 note)

USTR Morocco FTA information, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Morocco_FTA/Section_Index.html (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

USTR Morocco FTA Quotes of Support, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Morocco_FTA/Morocco_FTA.html (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

USTR Bahrain FTA information, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Bahrain_FTA/Section_Index.html (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Federal Register seeking Comments on the Panama FTA Negotiations, available at: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2004/pdf/04–3872.pdf (last visited Mar. 23, 2006)

Joint Statement by Panama and the United States on the Second Round of U.S.-Panama Free Trade Negotiations, June 11, 2004, available at: http://ustr.gov/Document_Library/Press_Releases/2004/June/Joint_Statement_by_Panama_the_United_States_on_the_Second_Round_of_U.S.-Panama_Free_Trade_Negotiations.html?ht= (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Press Release, U.S. and Panama to Begin FTA Negotiations on April 26, 2004, issued on 3/26/04, available at: http://ustr.gov/Document_Library/Press_Releases/2004/March/U.S._Panama_to_Begin_FTA_Negotiations_on_April_26.html (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

USTR Panama FTA information, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Panama_FTA/Section_Index.html (last visited on Mar. 24, 2006)

CAFTA-DR Final Text, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/CAFTA/CAFTA-DR_Final_Texts/Section_Index.html (last visited on Mar. 24, 2006)

CAFTA-DR Final Text en espanol (from El Salvador's Ministry of Economy), available at: http://www.minec.gob.sv/default.asp?id=84&mnu=70 (last visited Mar. 23, 2006)

Final Environmental Review of the Dominican Republic – Central America – United States Free Trade Agreement, available at: http://ustr.gov/assets/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/CAFTA/asset_upload_file953_7901.pdf (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Statement of USTR Rob Portman on Signing of U.S.-Central American-Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement. August 2, 2005, available at: http://ustr.gov/Document_Library/Press_Releases/2005/August/Statement_of_USTR_Rob_Portman_on_Signing_of_U.S.-Central_American-Dominican_Republic_Free_Trade_Agreement.html?ht= (last visited on Mar. 23, 2006).

USTR CAFTA information, available at: http://ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/CAFTA/Section_Index.html (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

Free Trade Agreement Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Chile, Dec. 5, 1996, available at: http://www.sice.oas.org/trade/chican_e/chca07ae.asp (last visited Mar. 24, 2006)

London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) Rules, Art. 26.6 (1998)

F. A. Mann, British Treaties for the Promotion and Protection of Investments, 52 Brit. Y.B. Int'l L. 241, 244 (1981)

The Treaty of Rome Establishing the European Economic Community, Mar. 25, 1957, 298 U.N.T.S. 3. Article 63 of the Brussels Convention

American Coalition for Competitive Trade v. Clinton, 128 F.3d 761, 765 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (citing 19 U.S.C. 1516a (g)(4)(A) (1994))[Standing/Interested Party – Due Process]

Barcelona Traction, Light & Power Co. (Belgium v. Spain), Second Phase, 1970 I.C.J. Rep. 3 (Feb. 5)[Standing]

Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Canada, Damages (May 31, 2002), 41 I.L.M. 1347 (2002) [NAFTA Chapter 11 – National Treatment/Expropriation]

United States (L.F. Neer) v. United Mexican States (U.S.-Mex. General Claims Comm'n Oct. 15, 1926), 4 R.I.A.A. 60, 3 ILR 213 (1927)

Mondev Int'l Ltd. v. United States (NAFTA Ch. 11 Arb. Trib. Oct. 11, 2002), 42 I.L.M. 85 (2003) [State Agency Statutory Immunity]

Feldman Karpa v. United Mexican States (NAFTA Ch. 11 Arb. Trib. Dec. 16, 2002) [Expropriation / National Treatment]

S. D. Myers v. Canada, Second Partial Award (NAFTA Ch. 11 Arb. Trib. Oct. 21, 2002) [Parties – Indirect Control]

Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Canada, Interim Award (NAFTA Ch. 11 Arb. Trib. June 26,2000), para. 99, 23 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 455, 480 (2000), available at: http://www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/tna-nac/NAFTA-e.asp (last visited Aug. 15, 2005).

Adler, Matthew H., If We Build It, Will They Come? The Need for a Multilateral Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Civil Monetary Judgments, 26 Law & Pol'y Int'l Bus.79 (1989).Google Scholar

Beaumont, Paul R., A United Kingdom Perspective on the Proposed Hague Judgments Convention, 24 Brooklyn J. Int'l L.75, 100 (1998).Google Scholar

Christophe Bernasconi, Provisional Version of the New Practical Handbook on the Operation of the 1965 Hague Service Convention. July, 2003. Available at: http://hcch.e-vision.nl/upload/wop/lse_pd01e.pdf (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Birke, Richard & Teitz, Louise Ellen, American Law in a Time of Global Interdependence: U.S. National Reports to the 26th International Congress of Comparative Law: Section II, U.S. Mediation in 2001: The Path that Brought America to Uniform Laws and Mediation in Cyberspace. 50 Am. J. Comp. L.181 (Fall 2002).Google Scholar

Bruch, Carol S., The 1989 Inter-American Convention on Support Obligations, 40 Am. J. Comp. L.817 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gary B. Born, International Civil Litigation in United States Courts 298 (3d ed., Kluwer Law Int'l., 1996)

Glenn, H. Patrick, Foreign Judgments, the Common Law and the Constitution: De Savoye v. Morguard Investments Ltd, 37 McGill L.J.537 (1992).Google Scholar

Hague Conference on Private International Law, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Prel. Docs. Nos. 2–6 (Dec. 1995–Aug. 1996)

Hague Conference on Private International Law, Conclusions of the Special Commission of May 2000 on General Affairs and Policy of the Conference, Prel. Doc. No. 10 (June 2000)

Internet and Federal Courts: Issues and Obstacles: Hearing before the Subcomm. on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Comm. on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, 106th Cong. 2 (2000) (witness testimony of Jeffrey Kovar, Assistant Legal Advisor for Private International Law, U.S. Department of State), at 22

Juenger, Fredriech K., A Shoe Unfit for Globetrotting, IV. Impediments to International Accommodation, 28 U.C. Davis L. Rev.1027, 1050 (1995).Google Scholar

Lipstein, Kurt, One Hundred Years of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, 42 Int'l Comp. L.Q.554 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynch, Katherine, The Forces of Economic Globalization: Challenges to the Regime of International Commercial Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer Law Int'l., 2003).Google Scholar

Maier, Harold G., A Hague Conference Judgments Convention and United States Courts: A Problem and a Possibility, 61 Alb. L. Rev.1207 (1998).Google Scholar

Nygh, Peter, Arthur's Baby: The Hague Negotiations for a World-Wide Judgments Convention in Law and Justice in a Multistate World: Essays in Honor of Arthur T. von Mehren 151 (Nafziger, J. & Symeonides, S., eds., 2002, Transnational Publishers, Inc,).Google Scholar

Gonzalo Parra-Aranguren, The Centenary of the Hague Conference on Private International Law in Etudes de Droit International en L'Honneur de Pierre Lalive (Christian Dominice, Robert Patry, & Claude Reymond eds., 1993)

Pfund, Peter H., International Unification of Private Law: A Report on United States Participation, 1985–1986, 20 Int'l Law.623 (1986).Google Scholar

Pfund, Peter H., The Hague Conference Celebrates Its 100th Anniversary, 28 Tex. Int'l L.J.531 (1993).Google Scholar

Pfund, Peter H., United States Participation in International Unification of Private Law, 19 Int'l Law.505 (1985).Google Scholar

Reese, W. & Johnson, V., The Scope of the Full Faith and Credit to Judgments, 49 Colum. L. Rev.153, 161 (1949) (quoting Sherrer v. Sherrer, 334 U.S. 343, 355 (1948)).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrea Schultz, Reflection Paper to Assist in Preparation of a Convention on Jurisdiction and Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Prel. Doc. No. 19, p. 6 (Aug. 2002), Hague Conference on Private International Law, available at: http://www.hcch.net/upload/wop/jdgm_pdlge.pdf (last accessed Mar. 22, 2006)

U. Schneider, The Uniform Rules for International Credit Transfers Under the UNCITRAL Model Law in Legal Issues in International Credit Transfers 451 (W. Hadding & U. Schneider eds., Berlin, 1993)

Sherman, Edward F., American Class Actions: Significant Features and Developing Alternatives in Foreign Legal Systems, 215 F.R.D.130 (2003).Google Scholar

Survey Regarding Business Practices on Jurisdictional Issues, Int'l Chamber of Commerce (Mar. 2003)

Symposium: New Directions in Comparative Law, 46 Am. J. Comp. L.597 (1998).

Symposium: New Approaches to Comparative Law, 1 997 Utah L. Rev.255 (1997).

Farrow, Trevor C. W., Globalization, International Human Rights, and Civil Procedure, 41 Alberta L. Rev.671 (Dec. 2003).Google Scholar

U.S. Department of State Authentication Office, available at: http://www.state.gov/m/a/auth/ (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Varady, J. Barcelo III, & A. von Mehren, International Commercial Arbitration (3d ed., Thomson-West 2006)

Mehren, Arthur & Trautman, Donald T., Recognition of Foreign Adjudications: A Survey and a Suggested Approach, 81 Harv. L. Rev.1601, 1610 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehren, Arthur, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: a New Approach for the Hague Conference?, 57 Law & Contemp. Prob.271 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

G. Walter & S. Baumgartner, General Report – The Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments Outside the Scope of the Brussels and Lugano Conventions in 3 Civil Procedure in Europe – the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments Outside the Scope of the Brussels and Lugano Conventions (G. Walter & S. Baumgartner eds. Klewer Law Int'l., 2000)

Weintraub, Russell J., How Substantial Is Our Need for a Judgments Recognition Convention and What Should We Bargain Away to Get It? 24 Brooklyn J. Int'l.174 (1998).Google Scholar

Zekoll, Joachim, The Role and Status of American Law in the Hague Judgments Convention Project, 61 Albany L. Rev.1283, 1297–1306 (1998).Google Scholar

Congress Approving the United States as a Member of the Hague Conference. 22 U.S.C. 269(g) (1988)

Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States 421, Reporters' Note 4 (1987)

Uncitral Model Law on International Credit Transfers, adopted by the United Nations Commission on International Law on May 15, 1992

Schlunk v. Volkswagenwerk A. G., 486 U.S. 694 (1988) [Service of Process]

Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme et L'Antisemitisme, 169 F. Supp. 2d 1181 (2001) [Comity]

Delbruek v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, 464 F. Supp. 989 (S.D.N.Y. 1979), at 993 [Choice of Law]

Evra Corporation v. Swiss Bank Corporation, 522 F. Supp. 820 (N.D. Ill. 1981), at 826 [Choice of Law]

Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd. v. Bloch, [1983] 1 W.L.R. 730, 733 (Eng. C.A. 1982)

Draft on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Work. Doc. No. 110 E, Revised, April 2004

Draft on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Work. Doc. No. 49 E, Revised, December 2003

Final Draft Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Doc. No. 37 (June 30, 2005)

Masato Dogauchi and Trevor Hartley, Draft Report on Preliminary Draft Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Prel. Doc. No. 25 (March 2004), at 6–7

Brussels Convention for most EC Member States, 348 final of July 14, 1999

Collection of Hague Conference Conventions (1951–2003). HCCH Publications, 2003

Comment, The United States and the Hague Conferences on Private International Law, 1 Am. J. Comp. L.268 (1952).CrossRef

Comments on IPR Aspects of Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgment in Civil and Commercial Matters (Consumer Project on Technology, Washington, D.C.), Jan. 12, 2001, available at: http://www.cptech.org/ecom/hague/CPT-Hague-IPR-Jan12-USPTO.html (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Comments to the USPTO on Hague Convention (Jurisdiction/Judgments) (A.I.P.L.A. Arlington, VA), Dec. 8, 2000, available at: http://www.aipla.org/Content/ContentGroups/Issues_and_Advocacy/Comments2/Hague_Convention/HagueConvention.pdf (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Commission of the European Communities, Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters 19 (1999) (on file with author)

Communication of 9 August 2000 from the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference to the National Organs of the Member States, L.C. ON No. 44 (00), 2 (2000)

Convention of 15 November 1965 on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=17 (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=24 (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalization for Foreign Public Documents, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=41 (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Convention on the Grant of European Patents, Oct. 5, 1973, 1065 U.N.T.S. 255, 13 I.L.M. 270 [hereinafter EPC]

Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards [New York Convention], 9 U.S.C.A. §201, 21 U.S.T. 2517, 330 U.N.T.S. 38 (1959)

European Communities, Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1972 O.J. (L299) 32, reprinted as amended in 29 I.L.M. 1413 (1990)

Explanatory Report on the 1965 Hague Choice of Court Convention; L. Welamson; 1965

Explanatory Report on the 1965 Hague Service Convention; V. Taborda Ferreira; 1965

Explanatory Report on the 1971 Hague Judgments Convention; C. N. Fragistas & G. Droz; 1969

Hague Conference on Private International Law. Proceedings of the Special Commission with a Diplomatic Character of September–October 1999, at 461

Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Certain Rights in respect of Securities held with an Intermediary, 13 December 2002

Hague Conference on Private International Law, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=98

Inter-American Convention on Support Obligations, July 15, 1989, Art. 8, 29 I.L.M. 73 (1990)

International Criminal Court (ICC): Report of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court on Sudan (June 29, 2005)

International Law Commission, Draft Code of Crimes Against the Peace and Security of Mankind, 1996, art. 18, at http://www.un.org/law/ilc/texts/dcodefra.htm (last accessed Aug. 15,2005)

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS): Election of Seven Members (June 22, 2005)

Catherine Kessedjian, Synthesis of the Work of the Special Commission of March 1998 on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Hague Conf. Prelim. Doc. No. 9 (July 1998)

Catherine Kessedjian, Synthesis of the Work of the Special Commission of March 1998 on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Preliminary Document No. 9, at 40–44 (1998)

Letter from Edwin D. Williamson, Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, to Georges Droz, Secretary General, The Hague Conference on Private International Law (May 5, 1992) (Hague Conference document L.C. ON No. 15 (92)).

Letter from Jeffrey D. Kovar, Assistant Legal Adviser for Private International Law, U.S. Dept. of State, to J. H. A. van Loon, Secretary General, Hague Conference on Private International Law (Feb. 22, 2000)

Letter from Jeffrey D. Kovar, Assistant Legal Advisor for Private International Law, United States Department of State, to J. H. A. van Loon, Secretary General, Hague Conference on Private International Law (Feb. 22, 2000) (on file with author)

Letter from Jeffrey Kovar, Assistant Legal Advisor for Private International Law, U.S. Department of State, to Alasdair Wallace, Head of International and Common Law Services Division, England, (Sept. 10, 2000)

Note of Question of “Forum Non-Conveniens” in the Perspective of the Double Convention on Judicial Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Decisions, Prel. Doc. No. 3 (1996), available at: http://www.state.gov/www/global/legal_affairs/forum.html (last accessed.15, 2005)

P. Nygh & F. Pocar, Report of the Special Commission, available at the Hague Conference Web site, http://www.hcch.net (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Permanent Bureau, Conclusions of the Working Group Meeting on Enforcement of Judgments in the Hague Conference on Private International Law, Proceedings of the Seventeenth Session 10 to 29 May 29, 1993, Tome I, 17 H.C.P.I.L. Proc. 257 (1995)

Resolution adopted by the Seventeenth Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, 19 May 1993, available at: www.hcch.net/e/resolution.html

Statute of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, July 1955

Statute of The Hague Conference on Private International Law, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=29 (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Summary of the Outcome of the Discussion in Commission II of the First Part of the Diplomatic Conference of 6–20 June 2001, available at: www.hcch.net, (2001 Draft)

Supplementary Protocol to The Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1 February 1971

Supplementary Protocol to the Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1971 Hague Convention

The Hague Conference on Private International Law. Seehttp://www.hcch.net/index_en.php (last accessed Aug. 15,2005)

The Hague Convention Concerning the International Administration of the Estates of Deceased Persons, 2 October 1973

The Hague Convention Concerning the Recognition of the Legal Personality of Foreign Companies, Associations and Institutions, 1 June 1956

The Hague Convention listing of Member States. Seehttp://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=states.listing (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

The Hague Convention on International Access to Justice, 25 October 1980

The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law and Recognition of Decrees Relating to Adoptions, 15 November 1965

The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-Operation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children, 19 generic Referencer 1996

The Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-Operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption, 29 May 1993

The Hague Convention on the Choice of Court, 25 November 1965

The Hague Convention on the International Protection of Adults, 13 January 2000

The Hague Convention on the Jurisdiction of the Selected Forum in the Case of International Sales of Goods, 15 April 1958

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Agency, 14 March 1978

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, 22 December 1986

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to International Sales of Goods, 15 June 1955

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations, 2 October 1973

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Trusts and on Their Recognition, 1 July 1985

The Hague Convention on the Law Governing Transfer of Title in International Sales of Goods, 15 April 1958

The Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions Relating to Maintenance Obligations, 2 October 1973

The Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1 February 1971

The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters (Nov. 15, 1965)

The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters (Nov. 15, 1965), which were reviewed in 2003 by a Conference Special Committee

The Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (Mar. 18, 1970)

The Hague Convention Relating to Civil Procedure, 1 March 1954

The Hague Convention Relating to the Settlement of the Conflicts Between the Law of Nationality and the Law of Domicile, 15 June 1955

U.S.-U.K. Convention on the Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil Matters. 16 I.L.M. 71 (1977), revised in 1979, reprinted in 8 N.C.J. Int'l. & Comm. Reg. 322 (1983)

UNCC Governing Council: Report and Recommendations Made by the Panel of Commissioners Concerning the Fifth Installment of F4 Claims (June 30, 2005)

UNCITRAL: Adoption of Draft Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracting (July 15, 2005)

United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, June 10, 1958, 21 U.S.T. 2517, T.I.A.S. No. 6997, 330 U.N.T.S. 38

U.S. participation in the Hague Conference on Private International Law was authorized by Congress in 1963. H.R.J. Res. 778, 88th Cong., 77 Stat. 775 (1963), codified as amended at 22 U.S.C. § 269g (1988)

U.S. Participation in the Hague Conference and the Rome Institute: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on International Organizations and Movements of the House Comm. on Foreign Affairs, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. 732 (1963)

Arthur von Mehren, Minutes No. 3, Commission I, Seventeenth Session, Hague Conference on Private International Law, Meeting of 20 May 1993, at 1 (on file with the Cornell International Law Journal)

Brand, Ronald A., Foreign Judgments in U.S. Courts 2 Can. Int'l Law.10 (1996).Google Scholar

Coffino, M. J. & Wolff, M. T., Choice of Law and Forum Clauses, Int'l Comm. Lit. 37. (Dec. 1995–Jan. 1996).Google Scholar

Kennett, W., Forum Non Conveniens in Europe, 54 Cambridge L.J.552 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lober, Burckhardt, Forum Shopping, Forum non Conveniens oder Schlicht: Justizgewahrungsanspruch, 6 IPRAX283 (1986).Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas F., Thoughts About a Multinational Judgments Convention: A Reaction to the von Mehren Report, 57 Law & Contemp. Probs.289 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Arthur R. & Crump, David, Jurisdiction and Choice of Law in Multistate Class Actions After Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, 96 Yale L.J.1, 16 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, M. Paul, Forum Selection Clauses and Fundamental Breach: Z.I. Pompey Industrie v. Ecu-Line N.V., The Canmar Fortune, 36 Can. Bus. L.J.453 (2002).Google Scholar

Rabel, Ernst, The Conflict of Laws – A Comparative Study (4 vols., 1945–1954). Martin Stueckelberg, Lis Pendens and Forum Non Conveniens at the Hague Conference, 26 Brooklyn J. Int'l L.949 (2001).Google Scholar

Reimann, Mathias, Parochialism in American Conflicts Law. 49 Am. J. Comp. L.369 (Summer 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robertson, , The Federal Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens: “An Object Lesson in Uncontrolled Discretion,” 29 Tex. Int'l L.J.353, 370, n.139 (1994).Google Scholar

Symeon C. Symeonides, Wendy Collins Perdue, & Arthur T. von Mehren, Cases and Materials on Conflict of Laws: American, Comparative, International 820–21 (2d ed., Thomson-West, 2003)

Mehren, Arthur T. & Trautman, Donald T., Recognition of Foreign Adjudications: A Survey and a Suggested Approach, 81 Harv. L. Rev.1601, 1606–07 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehren, Arthur T., Drafting A Convention on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments Acceptable Worldwide: Can the Hague Conference Project Succeed? 49 Am. J. Comp. L.191 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brand, Ronald A., Intellectual Property, Electronic Commerce and the Preliminary Hague Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention, 62 U. Pitt. L. Rev.581, 582 (2001).Google Scholar

Brand, Ronald A., Intellectual Property, Electronic Commerce and the Preliminary Draft Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 62 U. Pitt. L. Rev.581, 587 (2001).Google Scholar

Brinkhof, Jan J., Could the President of the District Court of the Hague Take Measures Concerning the Infringement of Foreign Patents? 16 Eur. Intell. Prop. Rev.360, 361 (1994).Google Scholar

DeCluitt, Christopher D., International Patent Prosecution, Litigation and Enforcement, 5 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L.135 (1997).Google Scholar

Dreyfuss, Rochelle C., Symposium: Intellectual Property Challenges in the Next Century – An Alert to the Intellectual Property Bar: The Hague Judgments Convention, U. Ill. L. Rev.421, 427 (2001), citing Draft Hague Convention art. 17.Google Scholar

Elacqua, Benjamin C., The Hague Runs into B2B: Why Restructuring the Hague Convention of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters to Deal With B2B Contracts Is Long Overdue, 3 J. High Tech. L.93 (2004).Google Scholar

J., Dick C.A. Van Engelen, Intellectual Property Issues in Cross-Border Transactions, 5 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L.135 (1997).Google Scholar

Bermann, George A., The Use of Anti-Suit Injunctions in International Litigation, 28 Colum. J. Transnat'l L.589, 594–5 (1990).Google Scholar

Hartley, Trevor C., Antisuit Injunctions and the Brussels Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention, 49 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.166 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas F., Forum Shopping, Antisuit Injunctions, Negative Declarations and Related Tools of International Litigation, 91 Am. J. Int'l L.314 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudleston, Sarah, Note, Preserving Free Speech in a Global Courtroom: The Proposed Hague Convention and the First Amendment, 10 Minn. J. Global Trade403, 427–28 (2001).Google Scholar

Minehan, Karen E., The Public Policy Exception to the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Necessary or Nemesis?, 18 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L.J.795, 798 (1996).Google Scholar

Shaak, Beth, In Defense of Civil Redress: The Domestic Enforcement of Civil Rights Norms in the Context of the Proposed Hague Judgments Convention, 42 Harv. Int'l L.J.141 (2001).Google Scholar

Alford, Mary Anne, The Effect of the Proposed U.S.-U.K. Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Civil Judgments Treaty on Current Recognition Practices in the U.S, 18 Colum. J. Transnat'l L.119, 120 (1979).Google Scholar

Danford, Brandon, The Enforcement of Foreign Money Judgments in the United States and Europe: How Can We Achieve A Comprehensive Treaty?, 23 Rev. Litig.381, 403 (2004).Google Scholar

Saumier, Genevieve, The Recognition of Foreign Judgments in Quebec – The Mirror Crack'd 81 Can. Bar Rev. 677 at 704–09, 713–15 (2002).Google Scholar

Giovanoli, Paiements et obligations Monetaires internationales, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (1997)

Fairley, H. Scott, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments by Canadian Courts: A New Age of Uncertainty 2 Can. Int'l Law.1 (1996).Google Scholar

Franklin, Johnathan A. & Morris, Roberta J., International Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments in the Era of Global Networks: Irrelevance of, Goals for, and Comments on the Current Proposals, 77 Chi.-Kent L. Rev.1213, 1237–8 (2002).Google Scholar

Miller, Katherine R., Playground Politics: Assessing the Wisdom of Writing a Reciprocity Requirement into U.S. International Recognition and Enforcement Law, 35 Georgetown J. Int'l L.239, 257 (2004).Google Scholar

Mehren, Arthur, Enforcing Judgments Abroad: Reflections on the Design of Recognition Conventions, 24 Brooklyn J. Int'l L.17 (1998).Google Scholar

Bassett, Debra Lyn, U.S. Class Actions Go Global: Transnational Class Actions and Personal Jurisdiction, 72 Fordham L. Rev. 41, 72–3, 91 (2003).Google Scholar

Borchers, Patrick J., Comparing Personal Jurisdiction in the United States and European Community: Lessons for American Reform, 40 Am. J. Comp. L.121, 143–6 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borchers, Patrick J., Could a Treaty Trump Supreme Court Jurisdictional Doctrine? Judgments Conventions and Minimum Contacts, 61 Alb. L. Rev.1161. (1998).Google Scholar

Born, G., Forum Selection Clauses Anatomized, Int'l Comm. Lit. 26 (May 1999).Google Scholar

Brand, , Due Process, Jurisdiction and a Hague Judgments Convention, 60 U. Pitt. L. Rev.661 (1999).

Burbank, Stephan B., Interjurisdictional Preclusion, Full Faith and Credit and Federal Common Law: A General Approach, 71 Cornell L. Rev.733, 744 (1986).Google Scholar

Burbank, Stephan B., Jurisdiction to Adjudicate: End of the Century or Beginning of the Millennium?, 7 Tul. J. Int'l Comp. L.111, at 119 (1999).Google Scholar

Burbank, Stephan B., The Reluctant Partner: Making Procedural Law for International Civil Litigation, 57 Law & Contemp. Probs.103, 131–5 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kessedjian, Catherine, International Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters 12, Hague Conference on Private Int'l Law, Prel. Doc. No.7, 1997 (Kessedjian Report), at 88, cited in Russell J. Weintraub, How Substantial Is Our Need For a Judgments Recognition Convention and What Should We Bargain Away to Get it?, 24 Brooklyn J. Int'l L.167, 186 (1998).Google Scholar

Clayton, Kristen Hudson, The Draft Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments and the Internet – A New Jurisdictional Framework, 36 J. Marshall L. Rev.223, 227–8 (2002).Google Scholar

Clermont, Kevin M., Jurisdictional Salvation and the Hague Treaty, 85 Cornell L. Rev.89 (1999).Google Scholar

Paul R. Dubinsky, The Reach of Doing Business Jurisdiction and Transacting Business Jurisdiction Over Non-U.S. Individuals and Entities (New York Law School, March 1998), available at: http://www.state.gov/www/global/legal_affairs/dubinsky.html

Fastiff, Eric B., The Proposed Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments: A Solution to Butch Reynold's Jurisdiction and Enforcement Problems, 28 Cornell Int'l L.J.469, 470 (1995).Google Scholar

Fawcett, J. J., General Report, in Declining Jurisdiction in Private International Law 10 (Fawcett, J. J. ed., Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).Google Scholar

Trevor C. Hartley, Introduction to the Brussels Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention, in 1994/vol. ⅴ Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, Book 1, 229 (Aspen Publishers, 1996)

P. Kaye, Civil Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments (1987)

O'Brian, William E., The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments: The Way Forward, 66 Mod. L. Rev.491 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Randall, Kenneth C., Universal Jurisdiction Under International Law, 66 Tex. L. Rev.785, 789 (1988).Google Scholar

Silberman, Linda J., Can the Hague Project Be Saved? A Perspective from the United States, in A Global Law of Jurisdiction and Judgments: Lessons from the Hague 159, 182 (Barcelo, John J. III & Clermont, Kevin M. eds., The Hague/New York: Klewer Law Int'l., 2002).Google Scholar

Theis, William H., Admiralty Proceedings and the Proposed Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments, 32 J. Marshall L. & Com.59, 61–2 (2001).Google Scholar

Peter D. Trooboff, Proposed Hague Conference General Convention on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments – Some Thoughts on Finding Solutions to Tough Issues, in, E Pluribus Unum – Liber Amicorum Georges A. L. Droz (Barras et al., eds. 1996) 461, at 464–5

Twitchell, M., Why We Keep Doing Business with Doing-Business Jurisdiction, 171 U. Chi. Legal F. 202 (2001).Google Scholar

Mehren, Arthur & Trautman, Donald, Jurisdiction to Adjudicate: A Suggested Analysis, 79 Harv. L. Rev.1131 (1966).Google Scholar

Mehren, Arthur, Drafting a Convention on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments Acceptable World-Wide: Can the Hague Convention Project Succeed?, 49 Am. J. Comp. L.191, 194 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehren, Arthur, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments – General Theory and the Role of Jurisdictional Requirements, in Academy of International Law, 167 Receuil des Cours (1980-II) 9–112 (1981).Google Scholar

Horatia Muir Watt, New Perspectives for Jurisdiction and Judgements in Europe: A Critical View (on file with author)

Weinstein, James, The Early American Origins of Territoriality in Judicial Jurisdiction, 37 St. Louis U. L.J.1 (1992).Google Scholar

Adler, Matthew H., If We Build It, Will They Come? The Need for a Multilateral Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Civil Monetary Judgments, 26 Law & Pol'y Int'l Bus.79 (1989).Google Scholar

Beaumont, Paul R., A United Kingdom Perspective on the Proposed Hague Judgments Convention, 24 Brooklyn J. Int'l L.75, 100 (1998).Google Scholar

Christophe Bernasconi, Provisional Version of the New Practical Handbook on the Operation of the 1965 Hague Service Convention. July, 2003. Available at: http://hcch.e-vision.nl/upload/wop/lse_pd01e.pdf (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Birke, Richard & Teitz, Louise Ellen, American Law in a Time of Global Interdependence: U.S. National Reports to the 26th International Congress of Comparative Law: Section II, U.S. Mediation in 2001: The Path that Brought America to Uniform Laws and Mediation in Cyberspace. 50 Am. J. Comp. L.181 (Fall 2002).Google Scholar

Bruch, Carol S., The 1989 Inter-American Convention on Support Obligations, 40 Am. J. Comp. L.817 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gary B. Born, International Civil Litigation in United States Courts 298 (3d ed., Kluwer Law Int'l., 1996)

Glenn, H. Patrick, Foreign Judgments, the Common Law and the Constitution: De Savoye v. Morguard Investments Ltd, 37 McGill L.J.537 (1992).Google Scholar

Hague Conference on Private International Law, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Prel. Docs. Nos. 2–6 (Dec. 1995–Aug. 1996)

Hague Conference on Private International Law, Conclusions of the Special Commission of May 2000 on General Affairs and Policy of the Conference, Prel. Doc. No. 10 (June 2000)

Internet and Federal Courts: Issues and Obstacles: Hearing before the Subcomm. on Courts and Intellectual Property of the Comm. on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives, 106th Cong. 2 (2000) (witness testimony of Jeffrey Kovar, Assistant Legal Advisor for Private International Law, U.S. Department of State), at 22

Juenger, Fredriech K., A Shoe Unfit for Globetrotting, IV. Impediments to International Accommodation, 28 U.C. Davis L. Rev.1027, 1050 (1995).Google Scholar

Lipstein, Kurt, One Hundred Years of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, 42 Int'l Comp. L.Q.554 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynch, Katherine, The Forces of Economic Globalization: Challenges to the Regime of International Commercial Arbitration (The Hague: Kluwer Law Int'l., 2003).Google Scholar

Maier, Harold G., A Hague Conference Judgments Convention and United States Courts: A Problem and a Possibility, 61 Alb. L. Rev.1207 (1998).Google Scholar

Nygh, Peter, Arthur's Baby: The Hague Negotiations for a World-Wide Judgments Convention in Law and Justice in a Multistate World: Essays in Honor of Arthur T. von Mehren 151 (Nafziger, J. & Symeonides, S., eds., 2002, Transnational Publishers, Inc,).Google Scholar

Gonzalo Parra-Aranguren, The Centenary of the Hague Conference on Private International Law in Etudes de Droit International en L'Honneur de Pierre Lalive (Christian Dominice, Robert Patry, & Claude Reymond eds., 1993)

Pfund, Peter H., International Unification of Private Law: A Report on United States Participation, 1985–1986, 20 Int'l Law.623 (1986).Google Scholar

Pfund, Peter H., The Hague Conference Celebrates Its 100th Anniversary, 28 Tex. Int'l L.J.531 (1993).Google Scholar

Pfund, Peter H., United States Participation in International Unification of Private Law, 19 Int'l Law.505 (1985).Google Scholar

Reese, W. & Johnson, V., The Scope of the Full Faith and Credit to Judgments, 49 Colum. L. Rev.153, 161 (1949) (quoting Sherrer v. Sherrer, 334 U.S. 343, 355 (1948)).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrea Schultz, Reflection Paper to Assist in Preparation of a Convention on Jurisdiction and Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Prel. Doc. No. 19, p. 6 (Aug. 2002), Hague Conference on Private International Law, available at: http://www.hcch.net/upload/wop/jdgm_pdlge.pdf (last accessed Mar. 22, 2006)

U. Schneider, The Uniform Rules for International Credit Transfers Under the UNCITRAL Model Law in Legal Issues in International Credit Transfers 451 (W. Hadding & U. Schneider eds., Berlin, 1993)

Sherman, Edward F., American Class Actions: Significant Features and Developing Alternatives in Foreign Legal Systems, 215 F.R.D.130 (2003).Google Scholar

Survey Regarding Business Practices on Jurisdictional Issues, Int'l Chamber of Commerce (Mar. 2003)

Symposium: New Directions in Comparative Law, 46 Am. J. Comp. L.597 (1998).

Symposium: New Approaches to Comparative Law, 1 997 Utah L. Rev.255 (1997).

Farrow, Trevor C. W., Globalization, International Human Rights, and Civil Procedure, 41 Alberta L. Rev.671 (Dec. 2003).Google Scholar

U.S. Department of State Authentication Office, available at: http://www.state.gov/m/a/auth/ (last visited Aug. 15, 2005)

Varady, J. Barcelo III, & A. von Mehren, International Commercial Arbitration (3d ed., Thomson-West 2006)

Mehren, Arthur & Trautman, Donald T., Recognition of Foreign Adjudications: A Survey and a Suggested Approach, 81 Harv. L. Rev.1601, 1610 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehren, Arthur, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: a New Approach for the Hague Conference?, 57 Law & Contemp. Prob.271 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

G. Walter & S. Baumgartner, General Report – The Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments Outside the Scope of the Brussels and Lugano Conventions in 3 Civil Procedure in Europe – the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments Outside the Scope of the Brussels and Lugano Conventions (G. Walter & S. Baumgartner eds. Klewer Law Int'l., 2000)

Weintraub, Russell J., How Substantial Is Our Need for a Judgments Recognition Convention and What Should We Bargain Away to Get It? 24 Brooklyn J. Int'l.174 (1998).Google Scholar

Zekoll, Joachim, The Role and Status of American Law in the Hague Judgments Convention Project, 61 Albany L. Rev.1283, 1297–1306 (1998).Google Scholar

Congress Approving the United States as a Member of the Hague Conference. 22 U.S.C. 269(g) (1988)

Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States 421, Reporters' Note 4 (1987)

Uncitral Model Law on International Credit Transfers, adopted by the United Nations Commission on International Law on May 15, 1992

Schlunk v. Volkswagenwerk A. G., 486 U.S. 694 (1988) [Service of Process]

Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme et L'Antisemitisme, 169 F. Supp. 2d 1181 (2001) [Comity]

Delbruek v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, 464 F. Supp. 989 (S.D.N.Y. 1979), at 993 [Choice of Law]

Evra Corporation v. Swiss Bank Corporation, 522 F. Supp. 820 (N.D. Ill. 1981), at 826 [Choice of Law]

Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd. v. Bloch, [1983] 1 W.L.R. 730, 733 (Eng. C.A. 1982)

Draft on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Work. Doc. No. 110 E, Revised, April 2004

Draft on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Work. Doc. No. 49 E, Revised, December 2003

Final Draft Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Doc. No. 37 (June 30, 2005)

Masato Dogauchi and Trevor Hartley, Draft Report on Preliminary Draft Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Prel. Doc. No. 25 (March 2004), at 6–7

Brussels Convention for most EC Member States, 348 final of July 14, 1999

Collection of Hague Conference Conventions (1951–2003). HCCH Publications, 2003

Comment, The United States and the Hague Conferences on Private International Law, 1 Am. J. Comp. L.268 (1952).CrossRef

Comments on IPR Aspects of Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgment in Civil and Commercial Matters (Consumer Project on Technology, Washington, D.C.), Jan. 12, 2001, available at: http://www.cptech.org/ecom/hague/CPT-Hague-IPR-Jan12-USPTO.html (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Comments to the USPTO on Hague Convention (Jurisdiction/Judgments) (A.I.P.L.A. Arlington, VA), Dec. 8, 2000, available at: http://www.aipla.org/Content/ContentGroups/Issues_and_Advocacy/Comments2/Hague_Convention/HagueConvention.pdf (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Commission of the European Communities, Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters 19 (1999) (on file with author)

Communication of 9 August 2000 from the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference to the National Organs of the Member States, L.C. ON No. 44 (00), 2 (2000)

Convention of 15 November 1965 on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=17 (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=24 (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalization for Foreign Public Documents, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=41 (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Convention on the Grant of European Patents, Oct. 5, 1973, 1065 U.N.T.S. 255, 13 I.L.M. 270 [hereinafter EPC]

Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards [New York Convention], 9 U.S.C.A. §201, 21 U.S.T. 2517, 330 U.N.T.S. 38 (1959)

European Communities, Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1972 O.J. (L299) 32, reprinted as amended in 29 I.L.M. 1413 (1990)

Explanatory Report on the 1965 Hague Choice of Court Convention; L. Welamson; 1965

Explanatory Report on the 1965 Hague Service Convention; V. Taborda Ferreira; 1965

Explanatory Report on the 1971 Hague Judgments Convention; C. N. Fragistas & G. Droz; 1969

Hague Conference on Private International Law. Proceedings of the Special Commission with a Diplomatic Character of September–October 1999, at 461

Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Certain Rights in respect of Securities held with an Intermediary, 13 December 2002

Hague Conference on Private International Law, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=98

Inter-American Convention on Support Obligations, July 15, 1989, Art. 8, 29 I.L.M. 73 (1990)

International Criminal Court (ICC): Report of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court on Sudan (June 29, 2005)

International Law Commission, Draft Code of Crimes Against the Peace and Security of Mankind, 1996, art. 18, at http://www.un.org/law/ilc/texts/dcodefra.htm (last accessed Aug. 15,2005)

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS): Election of Seven Members (June 22, 2005)

Catherine Kessedjian, Synthesis of the Work of the Special Commission of March 1998 on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Hague Conf. Prelim. Doc. No. 9 (July 1998)

Catherine Kessedjian, Synthesis of the Work of the Special Commission of March 1998 on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Preliminary Document No. 9, at 40–44 (1998)

Letter from Edwin D. Williamson, Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, to Georges Droz, Secretary General, The Hague Conference on Private International Law (May 5, 1992) (Hague Conference document L.C. ON No. 15 (92)).

Letter from Jeffrey D. Kovar, Assistant Legal Adviser for Private International Law, U.S. Dept. of State, to J. H. A. van Loon, Secretary General, Hague Conference on Private International Law (Feb. 22, 2000)

Letter from Jeffrey D. Kovar, Assistant Legal Advisor for Private International Law, United States Department of State, to J. H. A. van Loon, Secretary General, Hague Conference on Private International Law (Feb. 22, 2000) (on file with author)

Letter from Jeffrey Kovar, Assistant Legal Advisor for Private International Law, U.S. Department of State, to Alasdair Wallace, Head of International and Common Law Services Division, England, (Sept. 10, 2000)

Note of Question of “Forum Non-Conveniens” in the Perspective of the Double Convention on Judicial Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Decisions, Prel. Doc. No. 3 (1996), available at: http://www.state.gov/www/global/legal_affairs/forum.html (last accessed.15, 2005)

P. Nygh & F. Pocar, Report of the Special Commission, available at the Hague Conference Web site, http://www.hcch.net (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Permanent Bureau, Conclusions of the Working Group Meeting on Enforcement of Judgments in the Hague Conference on Private International Law, Proceedings of the Seventeenth Session 10 to 29 May 29, 1993, Tome I, 17 H.C.P.I.L. Proc. 257 (1995)

Resolution adopted by the Seventeenth Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, 19 May 1993, available at: www.hcch.net/e/resolution.html

Statute of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, July 1955

Statute of The Hague Conference on Private International Law, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=29 (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Summary of the Outcome of the Discussion in Commission II of the First Part of the Diplomatic Conference of 6–20 June 2001, available at: www.hcch.net, (2001 Draft)

Supplementary Protocol to The Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1 February 1971

Supplementary Protocol to the Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1971 Hague Convention

The Hague Conference on Private International Law. Seehttp://www.hcch.net/index_en.php (last accessed Aug. 15,2005)

The Hague Convention Concerning the International Administration of the Estates of Deceased Persons, 2 October 1973

The Hague Convention Concerning the Recognition of the Legal Personality of Foreign Companies, Associations and Institutions, 1 June 1956

The Hague Convention listing of Member States. Seehttp://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=states.listing (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

The Hague Convention on International Access to Justice, 25 October 1980

The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law and Recognition of Decrees Relating to Adoptions, 15 November 1965

The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-Operation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children, 19 generic Referencer 1996

The Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-Operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption, 29 May 1993

The Hague Convention on the Choice of Court, 25 November 1965

The Hague Convention on the International Protection of Adults, 13 January 2000

The Hague Convention on the Jurisdiction of the Selected Forum in the Case of International Sales of Goods, 15 April 1958

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Agency, 14 March 1978

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, 22 December 1986

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to International Sales of Goods, 15 June 1955

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations, 2 October 1973

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Trusts and on Their Recognition, 1 July 1985

The Hague Convention on the Law Governing Transfer of Title in International Sales of Goods, 15 April 1958

The Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions Relating to Maintenance Obligations, 2 October 1973

The Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1 February 1971

The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters (Nov. 15, 1965)

The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters (Nov. 15, 1965), which were reviewed in 2003 by a Conference Special Committee

The Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (Mar. 18, 1970)

The Hague Convention Relating to Civil Procedure, 1 March 1954

The Hague Convention Relating to the Settlement of the Conflicts Between the Law of Nationality and the Law of Domicile, 15 June 1955

U.S.-U.K. Convention on the Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil Matters. 16 I.L.M. 71 (1977), revised in 1979, reprinted in 8 N.C.J. Int'l. & Comm. Reg. 322 (1983)

UNCC Governing Council: Report and Recommendations Made by the Panel of Commissioners Concerning the Fifth Installment of F4 Claims (June 30, 2005)

UNCITRAL: Adoption of Draft Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracting (July 15, 2005)

United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, June 10, 1958, 21 U.S.T. 2517, T.I.A.S. No. 6997, 330 U.N.T.S. 38

U.S. participation in the Hague Conference on Private International Law was authorized by Congress in 1963. H.R.J. Res. 778, 88th Cong., 77 Stat. 775 (1963), codified as amended at 22 U.S.C. § 269g (1988)

U.S. Participation in the Hague Conference and the Rome Institute: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on International Organizations and Movements of the House Comm. on Foreign Affairs, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. 732 (1963)

Arthur von Mehren, Minutes No. 3, Commission I, Seventeenth Session, Hague Conference on Private International Law, Meeting of 20 May 1993, at 1 (on file with the Cornell International Law Journal)

Schlunk v. Volkswagenwerk A. G., 486 U.S. 694 (1988) [Service of Process]

Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme et L'Antisemitisme, 169 F. Supp. 2d 1181 (2001) [Comity]

Delbruek v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, 464 F. Supp. 989 (S.D.N.Y. 1979), at 993 [Choice of Law]

Evra Corporation v. Swiss Bank Corporation, 522 F. Supp. 820 (N.D. Ill. 1981), at 826 [Choice of Law]

Smith Kline & French Laboratories Ltd. v. Bloch, [1983] 1 W.L.R. 730, 733 (Eng. C.A. 1982)

Draft on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Work. Doc. No. 110 E, Revised, April 2004

Draft on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Work. Doc. No. 49 E, Revised, December 2003

Final Draft Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Doc. No. 37 (June 30, 2005)

Masato Dogauchi and Trevor Hartley, Draft Report on Preliminary Draft Convention on Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements, Prel. Doc. No. 25 (March 2004), at 6–7

Brussels Convention for most EC Member States, 348 final of July 14, 1999

Collection of Hague Conference Conventions (1951–2003). HCCH Publications, 2003

Comment, The United States and the Hague Conferences on Private International Law, 1 Am. J. Comp. L.268 (1952).CrossRef

Comments on IPR Aspects of Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgment in Civil and Commercial Matters (Consumer Project on Technology, Washington, D.C.), Jan. 12, 2001, available at: http://www.cptech.org/ecom/hague/CPT-Hague-IPR-Jan12-USPTO.html (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Comments to the USPTO on Hague Convention (Jurisdiction/Judgments) (A.I.P.L.A. Arlington, VA), Dec. 8, 2000, available at: http://www.aipla.org/Content/ContentGroups/Issues_and_Advocacy/Comments2/Hague_Convention/HagueConvention.pdf (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Commission of the European Communities, Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters 19 (1999) (on file with author)

Communication of 9 August 2000 from the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference to the National Organs of the Member States, L.C. ON No. 44 (00), 2 (2000)

Convention of 15 November 1965 on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=17 (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=24 (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalization for Foreign Public Documents, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=41 (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Convention on the Grant of European Patents, Oct. 5, 1973, 1065 U.N.T.S. 255, 13 I.L.M. 270 [hereinafter EPC]

Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards [New York Convention], 9 U.S.C.A. §201, 21 U.S.T. 2517, 330 U.N.T.S. 38 (1959)

European Communities, Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1972 O.J. (L299) 32, reprinted as amended in 29 I.L.M. 1413 (1990)

Explanatory Report on the 1965 Hague Choice of Court Convention; L. Welamson; 1965

Explanatory Report on the 1965 Hague Service Convention; V. Taborda Ferreira; 1965

Explanatory Report on the 1971 Hague Judgments Convention; C. N. Fragistas & G. Droz; 1969

Hague Conference on Private International Law. Proceedings of the Special Commission with a Diplomatic Character of September–October 1999, at 461

Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Certain Rights in respect of Securities held with an Intermediary, 13 December 2002

Hague Conference on Private International Law, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=98

Inter-American Convention on Support Obligations, July 15, 1989, Art. 8, 29 I.L.M. 73 (1990)

International Criminal Court (ICC): Report of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court on Sudan (June 29, 2005)

International Law Commission, Draft Code of Crimes Against the Peace and Security of Mankind, 1996, art. 18, at http://www.un.org/law/ilc/texts/dcodefra.htm (last accessed Aug. 15,2005)

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS): Election of Seven Members (June 22, 2005)

Catherine Kessedjian, Synthesis of the Work of the Special Commission of March 1998 on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Hague Conf. Prelim. Doc. No. 9 (July 1998)

Catherine Kessedjian, Synthesis of the Work of the Special Commission of March 1998 on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, Preliminary Document No. 9, at 40–44 (1998)

Letter from Edwin D. Williamson, Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, to Georges Droz, Secretary General, The Hague Conference on Private International Law (May 5, 1992) (Hague Conference document L.C. ON No. 15 (92)).

Letter from Jeffrey D. Kovar, Assistant Legal Adviser for Private International Law, U.S. Dept. of State, to J. H. A. van Loon, Secretary General, Hague Conference on Private International Law (Feb. 22, 2000)

Letter from Jeffrey D. Kovar, Assistant Legal Advisor for Private International Law, United States Department of State, to J. H. A. van Loon, Secretary General, Hague Conference on Private International Law (Feb. 22, 2000) (on file with author)

Letter from Jeffrey Kovar, Assistant Legal Advisor for Private International Law, U.S. Department of State, to Alasdair Wallace, Head of International and Common Law Services Division, England, (Sept. 10, 2000)

Note of Question of “Forum Non-Conveniens” in the Perspective of the Double Convention on Judicial Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Decisions, Prel. Doc. No. 3 (1996), available at: http://www.state.gov/www/global/legal_affairs/forum.html (last accessed.15, 2005)

P. Nygh & F. Pocar, Report of the Special Commission, available at the Hague Conference Web site, http://www.hcch.net (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Permanent Bureau, Conclusions of the Working Group Meeting on Enforcement of Judgments in the Hague Conference on Private International Law, Proceedings of the Seventeenth Session 10 to 29 May 29, 1993, Tome I, 17 H.C.P.I.L. Proc. 257 (1995)

Resolution adopted by the Seventeenth Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, 19 May 1993, available at: www.hcch.net/e/resolution.html

Statute of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, July 1955

Statute of The Hague Conference on Private International Law, available at: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=29 (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

Summary of the Outcome of the Discussion in Commission II of the First Part of the Diplomatic Conference of 6–20 June 2001, available at: www.hcch.net, (2001 Draft)

Supplementary Protocol to The Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1 February 1971

Supplementary Protocol to the Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1971 Hague Convention

The Hague Conference on Private International Law. Seehttp://www.hcch.net/index_en.php (last accessed Aug. 15,2005)

The Hague Convention Concerning the International Administration of the Estates of Deceased Persons, 2 October 1973

The Hague Convention Concerning the Recognition of the Legal Personality of Foreign Companies, Associations and Institutions, 1 June 1956

The Hague Convention listing of Member States. Seehttp://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=states.listing (last accessed Aug. 15, 2005)

The Hague Convention on International Access to Justice, 25 October 1980

The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law and Recognition of Decrees Relating to Adoptions, 15 November 1965

The Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-Operation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children, 19 generic Referencer 1996

The Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-Operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption, 29 May 1993

The Hague Convention on the Choice of Court, 25 November 1965

The Hague Convention on the International Protection of Adults, 13 January 2000

The Hague Convention on the Jurisdiction of the Selected Forum in the Case of International Sales of Goods, 15 April 1958

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Agency, 14 March 1978

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, 22 December 1986

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to International Sales of Goods, 15 June 1955

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations, 2 October 1973

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Trusts and on Their Recognition, 1 July 1985

The Hague Convention on the Law Governing Transfer of Title in International Sales of Goods, 15 April 1958

The Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions Relating to Maintenance Obligations, 2 October 1973

The Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 1 February 1971

The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters (Nov. 15, 1965)

The Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil and Commercial Matters (Nov. 15, 1965), which were reviewed in 2003 by a Conference Special Committee

The Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (Mar. 18, 1970)

The Hague Convention Relating to Civil Procedure, 1 March 1954

The Hague Convention Relating to the Settlement of the Conflicts Between the Law of Nationality and the Law of Domicile, 15 June 1955

U.S.-U.K. Convention on the Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil Matters. 16 I.L.M. 71 (1977), revised in 1979, reprinted in 8 N.C.J. Int'l. & Comm. Reg. 322 (1983)

UNCC Governing Council: Report and Recommendations Made by the Panel of Commissioners Concerning the Fifth Installment of F4 Claims (June 30, 2005)

UNCITRAL: Adoption of Draft Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracting (July 15, 2005)

United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, June 10, 1958, 21 U.S.T. 2517, T.I.A.S. No. 6997, 330 U.N.T.S. 38

U.S. participation in the Hague Conference on Private International Law was authorized by Congress in 1963. H.R.J. Res. 778, 88th Cong., 77 Stat. 775 (1963), codified as amended at 22 U.S.C. § 269g (1988)

U.S. Participation in the Hague Conference and the Rome Institute: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on International Organizations and Movements of the House Comm. on Foreign Affairs, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. 732 (1963)

Arthur von Mehren, Minutes No. 3, Commission I, Seventeenth Session, Hague Conference on Private International Law, Meeting of 20 May 1993, at 1 (on file with the Cornell International Law Journal)

Brand, Ronald A., Foreign Judgments in U.S. Courts 2 Can. Int'l Law.10 (1996).Google Scholar

Coffino, M. J. & Wolff, M. T., Choice of Law and Forum Clauses, Int'l Comm. Lit. 37. (Dec. 1995–Jan. 1996).Google Scholar

Kennett, W., Forum Non Conveniens in Europe, 54 Cambridge L.J.552 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lober, Burckhardt, Forum Shopping, Forum non Conveniens oder Schlicht: Justizgewahrungsanspruch, 6 IPRAX283 (1986).Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas F., Thoughts About a Multinational Judgments Convention: A Reaction to the von Mehren Report, 57 Law & Contemp. Probs.289 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Arthur R. & Crump, David, Jurisdiction and Choice of Law in Multistate Class Actions After Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, 96 Yale L.J.1, 16 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, M. Paul, Forum Selection Clauses and Fundamental Breach: Z.I. Pompey Industrie v. Ecu-Line N.V., The Canmar Fortune, 36 Can. Bus. L.J.453 (2002).Google Scholar

Rabel, Ernst, The Conflict of Laws – A Comparative Study (4 vols., 1945–1954). Martin Stueckelberg, Lis Pendens and Forum Non Conveniens at the Hague Conference, 26 Brooklyn J. Int'l L.949 (2001).Google Scholar

Reimann, Mathias, Parochialism in American Conflicts Law. 49 Am. J. Comp. L.369 (Summer 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robertson, , The Federal Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens: “An Object Lesson in Uncontrolled Discretion,” 29 Tex. Int'l L.J.353, 370, n.139 (1994).Google Scholar

Symeon C. Symeonides, Wendy Collins Perdue, & Arthur T. von Mehren, Cases and Materials on Conflict of Laws: American, Comparative, International 820–21 (2d ed., Thomson-West, 2003)

Mehren, Arthur T. & Trautman, Donald T., Recognition of Foreign Adjudications: A Survey and a Suggested Approach, 81 Harv. L. Rev.1601, 1606–07 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehren, Arthur T., Drafting A Convention on International Jurisdiction and the Effects of Foreign Judgments Acceptable Worldwide: Can the Hague Conference Project Succeed? 49 Am. J. Comp. L.191 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brand, Ronald A., Intellectual Property, Electronic Commerce and the Preliminary Hague Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention, 62 U. Pitt. L. Rev.581, 582 (2001).Google Scholar

Brand, Ronald A., Intellectual Property, Electronic Commerce and the Preliminary Draft Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, 62 U. Pitt. L. Rev.581, 587 (2001).Google Scholar

Brinkhof, Jan J., Could the President of the District Court of the Hague Take Measures Concerning the Infringement of Foreign Patents? 16 Eur. Intell. Prop. Rev.360, 361 (1994).Google Scholar

DeCluitt, Christopher D., International Patent Prosecution, Litigation and Enforcement, 5 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L.135 (1997).Google Scholar

Dreyfuss, Rochelle C., Symposium: Intellectual Property Challenges in the Next Century – An Alert to the Intellectual Property Bar: The Hague Judgments Convention, U. Ill. L. Rev.421, 427 (2001), citing Draft Hague Convention art. 17.Google Scholar

Elacqua, Benjamin C., The Hague Runs into B2B: Why Restructuring the Hague Convention of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters to Deal With B2B Contracts Is Long Overdue, 3 J. High Tech. L.93 (2004).Google Scholar

J., Dick C.A. Van Engelen, Intellectual Property Issues in Cross-Border Transactions, 5 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L.135 (1997).Google Scholar

Bermann, George A., The Use of Anti-Suit Injunctions in International Litigation, 28 Colum. J. Transnat'l L.589, 594–5 (1990).Google Scholar

Hartley, Trevor C., Antisuit Injunctions and the Brussels Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention, 49 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.166 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lowenfeld, Andreas F., Forum Shopping, Antisuit Injunctions, Negative Declarations and Related Tools of International Litigation, 91 Am. J. Int'l L.314 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudleston, Sarah, Note, Preserving Free Speech in a Global Courtroom: The Proposed Hague Convention and the First Amendment, 10 Minn. J. Global Trade403, 427–28 (2001).Google Scholar

Minehan, Karen E., The Public Policy Exception to the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Necessary or Nemesis?, 18 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L.J.795, 798 (1996).Google Scholar

Shaak, Beth, In Defense of Civil Redress: The Domestic Enforcement of Civil Rights Norms in the Context of the Proposed Hague Judgments Convention, 42 Harv. Int'l L.J.141 (2001).Google Scholar

Alford, Mary Anne, The Effect of the Proposed U.S.-U.K. Reciprocal Recognition and Enforcement of Civil Judgments Treaty on Current Recognition Practices in the U.S, 18 Colum. J. Transnat'l L.119, 120 (1979).Google Scholar

Danford, Brandon, The Enforcement of Foreign Money Judgments in the United States and Europe: How Can We Achieve A Comprehensive Treaty?, 23 Rev. Litig.381, 403 (2004).Google Scholar

Saumier, Genevieve, The Recognition of Foreign Judgments in Quebec – The Mirror Crack'd 81 Can. Bar Rev. 677 at 704–09, 713–15 (2002).Google Scholar

Giovanoli, Paiements et obligations Monetaires internationales, in Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law (1997)

Fairley, H. Scott, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments by Canadian Courts: A New Age of Uncertainty 2 Can. Int'l Law.1 (1996).Google Scholar

Franklin, Johnathan A. & Morris, Roberta J., International Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments in the Era of Global Networks: Irrelevance of, Goals for, and Comments on the Current Proposals, 77 Chi.-Kent L. Rev.1213, 1237–8 (2002).Google Scholar

Miller, Katherine R., Playground Politics: Assessing the Wisdom of Writing a Reciprocity Requirement into U.S. International Recognition and Enforcement Law, 35 Georgetown J. Int'l L.239, 257 (2004).Google Scholar

Mehren, Arthur, Enforcing Judgments Abroad: Reflections on the Design of Recognition Conventions, 24 Brooklyn J. Int'l L.17 (1998).Google Scholar

Bassett, Debra Lyn, U.S. Class Actions Go Global: Transnational Class Actions and Personal Jurisdiction, 72 Fordham L. Rev. 41, 72–3, 91 (2003).Google Scholar

Borchers, Patrick J., Comparing Personal Jurisdiction in the United States and European Community: Lessons for American Reform, 40 Am. J. Comp. L.121, 143–6 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Borchers, Patrick J., Could a Treaty Trump Supreme Court Jurisdictional Doctrine? Judgments Conventions and Minimum Contacts, 61 Alb. L. Rev.1161. (1998).Google Scholar

Born, G., Forum Selection Clauses Anatomized, Int'l Comm. Lit. 26 (May 1999).Google Scholar