Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T01:29:21.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Complaints themselves remedy: Marvell's lyrics as problem and solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2009

Judith Haber
Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

By the seventeenth century, the severing of pastoral connections that began in the early Renaissance appears to be complete. The interest in the lyric form during this period coincides with the development of a version of pastoral that is more self-reflexive, internalized, and metaphoric – a thoroughly self-conscious, “sentimental” pastoral that is epitomized by the poetry of Andrew Marvell. The problems that are posed by all of Marvell's pastorals appear in their most concentrated form in his Mower poems; Rosalie Colie comments: “Pastoral is cruelly intellectualized in these poems – and to intellectualize is radically to invert pastoral values in any case, which frankly relinquish intellectual burdens for the embrace of a comfortable natural passivity.” Colie's assessment clearly involves a radical oversimplification: she is ignoring the extent to which pastoral poetry has always been intellectualized, has always contained elements that seem antithetical to it. Nevertheless, we can appreciate the force of her insight: Marvell so insistently magnifies these elements in the Mower poems, and so consistently suppresses their opposites, that the ideals we traditionally associate with pastoral seem irretrievably lost. The condition of the inhabitants of these lyrics – and of their creator – approximates that of Sidney's courtiers; the self-enclosed self-division that Sidney feared seems fully realized here. But Marvell sees disjunction itself as the means of establishing continuity, and his apparent movement away from traditional bucolic values is, in fact, a movement back: he is self-consciously reinventing the paradoxical relationship of separation and connection upon which the classical pastoralists relied.

Type
Chapter
Information
Pastoral and the Poetics of Self-Contradiction
Theocritus to Marvell
, pp. 98 - 152
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×