Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T08:34:19.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Barriers to hybridization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2009

K. R. Shivanna
Affiliation:
University of Delhi
V. K. Sawhney
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan, Canada
Get access

Summary

Summary

Incompatibility barriers are major impediments in crop improvement programs. Nonsynchronous flowering and/or geographical isolation of parental species is common, particularly in wide crosses, and is critical in tree species. Postpollination barriers may operate before and/or after fertilization. Prefertilization barriers act either on the surface of the stigma (by inhibiting pollen germination or pollen tube entry into the stigma) or in the transmitting tissue of the stigma and style. Occasionally, pollen tubes may be inhibited in the ovary or in the ovule. More often, prefertilization barriers are not restricted to a particular level but may be active at all levels. The proportion of pollen grains that complete sequential postpollination events is reduced at each level, with the result that very few or no pollen tubes reach the ovule. In most of the interspecific crosses, pollen inhibition is passive (not as a result of active recognition of the pollen) because of the lack of co-adaptation between the pollen and the pistil. The most common postfertilization barrier is the abortion of the hybrid embryo at different developmental stages. In many of the crosses, this is a result of the lack of endosperm development or of its early breakdown. An understanding of the details of barriers at different levels is important for the application of effective techniques to overcome such barriers.

Introduction

Hybridization is one of the most effective methods of crop improvement programs. Most of the hybridization work carried out so far has used genetic variability within the species, and thus crossability barriers were not the main constraints in breeding programs.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×