Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:58:28.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative implementations of Berlekamp's and Niederreitor's polynomial factorization algorithms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2009

S. Cohen
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
H. Niederreiter
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access

Summary

Abstract

New C++-implementations of the classical factorization algorithms for polynomials over finite fields of Berlekamp and the new ones of Niederreiter are presented. Their performances on various types of inputs are compared.

Introduction

The basic problem of factorizing univariate polynomials over the finite field Fq has got new impulses in the past few years with a new linearization technique developed by Niederreiter in [8], [9], [10]. Unlike Berlekamp's classical approach, which uses the Frobenius fixed point algebra in A := Fq[X]/(f) (where f is the polynomial to be factored), Niederreiter's method is based on the analysis of the solution space of certain differential equations in the field of rational functions Fq(X).

From the very beginning there have been several striking similarities between Niederreiter's and Berlekamp's algorithms in each step. Suppose for simplicity that the polynomial is monic and squarefree. Then in both algorithms a certain system of linear equations has to be set up and solved, leading to an Fq - subspace S of A, whose dimension coincides with the number of irreducible factors of f. Now the elements of S can be used to extract the irreducible factors of f by suitable gcd operations.

Niederreiter's algorithm has the following practical advantages: In the case of small fields the linear equations to be solved can be set up very efficiently. In particular in F2 they can be read off directly from the coefficients of f.

Type
Chapter
Information
Finite Fields and Applications
Proceedings of the Third International Conference, Glasgow, July 1995
, pp. 73 - 84
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×