Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T16:30:13.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Anurans of the Crato Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2009

David M. Martill
Affiliation:
University of Portsmouth
Günter Bechly
Affiliation:
Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart
Robert F. Loveridge
Affiliation:
University of Portsmouth
Maria Eduarda C. Leal
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524, Rio de Janeiro, 20559–900, Brazil
David M. Martill
Affiliation:
Reader in Palaeobiology in the School of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Portsmouth
Paulo M. Brito
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524, Rio de Janeiro, 20559–900, Brazil.
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The Anura – frogs and toads of common parlance – comprise about 5,250 extant species with a near world wide distribution, excluding only Antarctica, the highest latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere and the marine realm. Their unique morphology, physiology and behavioural adaptations allow anurans to inhabit a wide range of environments, from the arctic tundra to hot arid deserts. However, they achieve their maximum diversity in the Neotropical rainforests (Duellman and Trueb, 1994; Hofrichter, 2000), where they prefer moist environments. Most species are required to return to freshwater environments for the development of their larvae.

Their temporal range begins in the Triassic if the pro-anurans of Madagascar and Poland are considered anurans. True anurans are relatively scarce in the Mesozoic, only becoming common and diverse in the Cenozoic (Roček, 2000). The earliest occurrence of a true anuran is Prosalirus bitis Shubin and Jenkins, 1995, from the Lower Jurassic of Arizona. This taxon achieved the basic anuran body plan that has persisted without significant modification for approximately 200 myr. Of the present 33 anuran families, five have a fossil record extending to the Mesozoic (Leiopelmatidae, Discoglossidae, Pipidae, Pelobatidae and Leptodactylidae), and one family, † Palaeobatrachidae, is exclusively Mesozoic. All but the † Palaeobatrachidae occur in Gondwana (Roček, 2000; Gao and Chen, 2004).

Anurans were first reported in the Crato Formation by Kellner and Campos (1986), where they occur only in the Nova Olinda Member (see Maisey, 1991: 325 for figure).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Crato Fossil Beds of Brazil
Window into an Ancient World
, pp. 444 - 451
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Báez, A. M. 1987. Anurans, pp. 121–130. InBonaparte, J. F. (ed.), The Late Cretaceous Fauna of Los Alamitos, Patagonia, Argentina. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, “Bernardino Rivadavia”. Paleontologia III.
Báez, A. M. 1991. A new early Paleocene neobatrachian frog from the Santa Lucia Formation in south central Bolivia, and comments on the Cretaceous and early Tertiary batrachofaunas of South America, pp. 529–540. InSuárez-Soruco, R. (ed.), Fósiles y Facies de Bolivia I, Vertebrados. Revista Técnica Yacimientos Petroliferos Fiscales Bolivianos12: Santa Cruz, Bolivia.Google Scholar
Báez, A. M. 2000. Tertiary Anura of South America, pp. 1388–1401. InHeatwole, H. and Carroll, R. L. (eds), Amphibian Biology, vol. 4. Chipping Norton, NSW: Surrey Beatty and Sons.Google Scholar
Báez, A. M. and Harrison, T. 2005. A new pipine frog from an Eocene crater lake in north-central Tanzania. Palaeontology 48: 723–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Báez, A. M. and Peri, S. 1989. Baurubatrachus pricei, nov. gen. et sp., un Anuro del Cretacico Superior de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Anais Academia Brasileira, Ciencias 61: 447–458.Google Scholar
Báez, A. M.Trueb, L. and Calvo, J. O. 2000. The earliest known pipoid frog from South America: a new genus from the Middle Cretaceous of Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 20: 490–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonaparte, J. F. 1986. History of the terrestrial Cretaceous vertebrates of Gondwana. IV Congreso Argentino de Paleontologia y Biostratigrafia Mendoza, Actas 2: 63–95.Google Scholar
Cannatella, D. C. and Hillis, D. M. 1993. Amphibian relationships: phylogenetic analysis of morphology and molecules. Herpetological Monographs 7: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannatella, D. C. and Trueb, L. 1988. Evolution of pipoid frogs: intergeneric relationships of the aquatic frog family Pipidae (Anura). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 94: 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowling, H. and Duellman, W. 1978. Systematic Herpetology: a Synopsis of Families and Higher Categories. Publications in Herpetology, vol. 7. New York: Hies Publications.Google Scholar
Duellman, W. E. and Trueb, L. 1994. Biology of Amphibians. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, L. S. 1989. The Phylogenetic Position of Poison-dart Frogs (Dendrobatidae): Reassessment of the Neobatrachian Phylogeny with Commentary on Complex Character Systems. PhD thesis, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KA.Google Scholar
Ford, L. S. and Cannatella, D. C. 1993. The major clades of frogs. Herpetological Monographs 7: 94–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, D. R., Grant, T. et al. 2006. The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 297: 1–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, K. Q. and Chen, S. 2004. A new frog (Amphibia: Anura) from the Lower Cretaceous of western Liaoning, China. Cretaceous Research 25: 761–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayet, M., Marshall, L. and Sempere, T. 1991. The Mesozoic and Paleocene vertebrates of Bolivia and their stratigraphic context: a review, pp. 393–433. InSuárez-Soruco, R. (ed.), Fósiles y Facies de Bolivia, vol. I, Vertebrados. Revista Técnica Yacimientos Petroliferos Fiscales Bolivianos12: Santa Cruz, Bolivia.Google Scholar
Haas, A., 2003. Phylogeny of frogs as inferred from primary larval characters (Amphibia: Anura). Cladistics 19: 23–89.Google Scholar
Henrici, A. 1998. A new pipoid anuran from the Late Jurassic Morrison Formation at Dinosaur National Monument, Utah. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 18: 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofrichter, R., 2000. Amphibian systematics, pp. 36–63. InHofrichter, R. (ed.), Amphibians: the World of Frogs, Toads, Salamanders and Newts. New York: Fire Books.Google Scholar
Kellner, A. W. A. and Campos, D. A. 1986. Primeiro registro de amphibia (Anura) do Cretáceo Inferior da Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. Anais Academia Brasileira Ciencias 58: 610.Google Scholar
Leal, M. E. C. and Brito, P. M. 2006. Anura do Cretáceo Inferior da Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil, pp. 145–152. InGallo, V., Brito, P. M., Silva, H. M. A. and Figueiredo, F. J. (eds), Paleontologia de Vertebrados – grandes temas e contribuições científicas. Rio de Janeiro: Interciência.Google Scholar
Lynch, J. D. 1971. Evolutionary relationships, osteology, and zoogeography of leptodactyloid frogs. Miscallaneous Publications of the Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas 53: 1–238.Google Scholar
Maisey, J. G. 1991. Undetermined Santana frog, pp. 324–325. InMaisey, J. G. (ed.), Santana Fossils: an Illustrated Atlas. Neptune City, NJ: T. F. H. Publications.Google Scholar
Roček, Z., 2000. Mesozoic anurans, pp. 1293–1331. InHeatwole, H. and Carroll, R. L. (eds), Amphibian Biology, vol. 4. Chipping Norton, NSW: Surrey Beatty and Sons.Google Scholar
Roelants, K. and Bossuyt, F. 2005. Archaeobatrachian paraphyly and Pangaean diversification of crown group frogs. Systematic Biology 54: 111–126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruvinsky, I. and Maxson, L. R. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships among bufonoid frogs (Anura: Neobatrachia) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetetics and Evolution 5: 533–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchiz, B. 1998. Salientia, pp. 1–276. In Wellnhofer, P. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Paleoherpetology Part 4. Munich: Verlag Dr. Pfeil, F.
Shubin, N. H. and Jenkins, F. A. Jr 1995. An early Jurassic jumping frog. Nature 377: 49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Anurans of the Crato Formation
    • By Maria Eduarda C. Leal, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524, Rio de Janeiro, 20559–900, Brazil, David M. Martill, Reader in Palaeobiology in the School of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Portsmouth, Paulo M. Brito, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524, Rio de Janeiro, 20559–900, Brazil.
  • David M. Martill, University of Portsmouth, Günter Bechly, Robert F. Loveridge, University of Portsmouth
  • Book: The Crato Fossil Beds of Brazil
  • Online publication: 22 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535512.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Anurans of the Crato Formation
    • By Maria Eduarda C. Leal, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524, Rio de Janeiro, 20559–900, Brazil, David M. Martill, Reader in Palaeobiology in the School of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Portsmouth, Paulo M. Brito, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524, Rio de Janeiro, 20559–900, Brazil.
  • David M. Martill, University of Portsmouth, Günter Bechly, Robert F. Loveridge, University of Portsmouth
  • Book: The Crato Fossil Beds of Brazil
  • Online publication: 22 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535512.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Anurans of the Crato Formation
    • By Maria Eduarda C. Leal, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524, Rio de Janeiro, 20559–900, Brazil, David M. Martill, Reader in Palaeobiology in the School of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Portsmouth, Paulo M. Brito, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524, Rio de Janeiro, 20559–900, Brazil.
  • David M. Martill, University of Portsmouth, Günter Bechly, Robert F. Loveridge, University of Portsmouth
  • Book: The Crato Fossil Beds of Brazil
  • Online publication: 22 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535512.014
Available formats
×