Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T08:22:30.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Environmental factors affecting geomagnetic field palaeointensity estimates from sediments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2009

Barbara A. Maher
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Roy Thompson
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Direct measurements of the Earth's magnetic field have been collected for several centuries (Merrill et al., 1996). Even from such short historical records it is clear that the magnetic field is not static but rather changes continuously on a variety of time scales. This variability is termed secular variation (SV). Palaeomagnetists, over the last several decades, have taken advantage of the natural remanent magnetization (NRM) recorded in rocks to extend our knowledge of the geomagnetic field secular variation backward into prehistoric time. Studies of palaeomagnetic secular variation provide a long-term view of geomagnetic field variability and are useful for aiding our understanding of the dynamo process which generates the Earth's magnetic field (e.g. Merrill et al., 1996) and for chronostratigraphic correlations (e.g. Creer et al., 1990).

It is well known from historical measurements that the Earth's magnetic field varies in both intensity and direction. But, since it is easier to recover high quality palaeomagnetic field directions than it is to arrive at reliable estimates of past field intensity (e.g. Tauxe, 1993), many palaeomagnetic studies have reported directional data only, even though intensity is an intrinsic component of secular variation. Reliable measurements of past intensity fluctuations should, however, yield added valuable information in the quest for a better understanding of the core dynamo process as well as provide an important additional chronostratigraphic correlation tool. For these reasons there has been considerable recent interest in estimating past field intensity changes (e.g. Mejia et al., 1996; Lehman et al., 1996).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×