Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T22:46:33.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

32 - Isotope tracers in catchment hydrology in the humid tropics

from Part IV - New methods for evaluating effects of land-use change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

J. M. Buttle
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 7B8, Canada
J. J. McDonnell
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
M. Bonell
Affiliation:
UNESCO, Paris
L. A. Bruijnzeel
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Isotope tracers are an important tool for quantifying the age, origin and pathway of water to streams in headwater catchments. While used regularly in temperate and high latitude areas, applications of isotope tracer techniques in the humid tropics have been minimal to date. In the developing world, finances and logistics often preclude the use of traditional hydrometric measures of streamflow, groundwater dynamics and soil water recharge. Thus, isotopic tracers and isotopic hydrograph separations (IHSs) can serve as a valuable tool for extending our understanding of streamflow generation in poorly gauged areas (Shuttleworth, 2002), particularly in humid low latitude regions. They can also provide complementary information on water sources and pathways that are often required in order to draw conclusions about streamflow generation (reviewed by Bonell, this volume), effects of disturbance on tropical forest ecosystems (Bruijnzeel, 1990), or the closure of nutrient cycles in tropical forest ecosystems (Elsenbeer et al., 1995).

The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of what has been accomplished in isotope tracing studies (mainly in mid-latitude environments to date) as an impetus for those working in the humid tropics to consider the merits of this approach. While we do not advocate use of this technique exclusively in research settings, we argue that it can be a valuable approach in the ‘toolkit’ of land managers and catchment scientists working on hydrological processes related to land use change in humid tropical areas.

Type
Chapter
Information
Forests, Water and People in the Humid Tropics
Past, Present and Future Hydrological Research for Integrated Land and Water Management
, pp. 770 - 789
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aggarwal, P. 2002. Isotope hydrology at the International Atomic Energy Agency. Hydrological Processes 16: 2257–2259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, SP, Dietrich, WE. 2001. Chemical weathering and runoff chemistry in a steep headwater catchment. Hydrological Processes 15: 1791–1815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, SP, Dietrich, WE, Montgomery, DR, Torres, R, Conrad, ME, Loague, K. 1997. Subsurface flow paths in a steep, unchanneled catchment. Water Resources Research 33: 2637–2653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bariac T, Millet A, Ladouche B, Mathieu R, Grimaldi C, Grimaldi M, Hubert P, Molicova H, Bruckler L, Bertuzzi P, Boulègue J, Brunet Y, Tournebize R, Granier A. 1995. Stream hydrograph separation on two small Guianese catchments. Tracer Technologies for Hydrological Systems. IAHS Publication 229: International Association of Hydrological Sciences: Wallingford; 193–209
Barling, RD, Moore, ID, Grayson, RB. 1994. A quasi-dynamic wetness index for characterizing the spatial distribution of zones of surface saturation and soil water content. Water Resources Research 30: 1029–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazemore, , Eshleman, KN, Hollenbeck, KJ. 1994. The role of soil water in stormflow generation in a forested headwater catchment: synthesis of natural tracer and hydrometric evidence. Journal of Hydrology 162: 47–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bencala, KE. 2000. Hyporheic zone hydrological processes. Hydrological Processes 14: 2797–27083.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beven, KJ, Kirkby, MJ. 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin 24: 43–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop KH. 1991. Episodic increases in stream acidity, catchment flow pathways and hydrograph separation. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, 246 p
Bonell, M, Pearce, AJ, Stewart, MK. 1990. The identification of runoff-production mechanisms using environmental isotopes in a tussock grassland catchment, eastern Otago, New Zealand. Hydrological Processes 4: 15–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonell M, Barnes CJ, Grant CR, Howard A, Burns J. 1998. High rainfall, response-dominated catchments: a comparative study of experiments in tropical northeast Queensland with temperate New Zealand. In Isotope Tracers in Catchment Hydrology, Kendall C, McDonnell JJ (eds). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 347–390
Bras RL. 1990. Hydrology: An Introduction to Hydrologic Science. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 643 p
Brodersen, C, Pohl, S, Lindenlaub, M, Leibundgut, C, v Wilpert, K. 2000. Influence of vegetation structure on isotope content of throughfall and soil water. Hydrological Processes 14: 1439–14483.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, VA, McDonnell, JJ, Burns, DA, Kendall, C. 1999. The role of event water, a rapid shallow flow component, and catchment size in summer stormflow. Journal of Hydrology 217: 171–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruijnzeel S. 1990. Hydrology of moist tropical forests and effects of conversion: A state of knowledge review. UNESCO International Hydrological Program, 224 pp
Burch, GJ, Moore, ID, Burns, J. 1987. Soil hydrophobic effects on infiltration and catchment runoff. Hydrological Processes 3: 211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, DA. 2002. Stormflow-hydrograph separation based on isotopes: the thrill is gone – what's next?Hydrological Processes 16: 1515–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, DA, McDonnell, JJ. 1998. Effects of a beaver pond on runoff processes: comparison of two headwater catchments. Journal of Hydrology 205: 248–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, DA, McDonnell, JJ, Hooper, RP, Peters, NE, Freer, JE, Kendall, C, Beven, K. 2001. Quantifying contributions to storm runoff through end-member mixing analysis and hydrologic measurements at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed (Georgia, USA). Hydrological Processes 15: 1903–1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttle, JM. 1990. Effects of suburbanization upon snowmelt runoff. Hydrological Sciences Journal 35: 285–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttle, JM. 1994. Isotope hydrograph separations and rapid delivery of pre-event water from drainage basins. Progress in Physical Geography 18: 16–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttle, JM, McDonald, DJ. 2002. Coupled vertical and lateral preferential flow on a forested slope. Water Resources Research 38: 10.1029/2001WR 000773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttle, JM, Peters, DL. 1997. Inferring hydrological processes in a temperate basin using isotopic and geochemical hydrograph separation: a re-evaluation. Hydrological Processes 11: 557–5733.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttle, JM, Sami, K. 1992. Testing the groundwater ridging hypothesis of streamflow generation during snowmelt. Journal of Hydrology 135: 53–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttle, JM, Turcotte, DS. 1999. Runoff processes on a forested slope on the Canadian Shield. Nordic Hydrology 30: 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttle, JM, Taylor, CH, Vonk, AM. 1992. Environmental isotope hydrograph separation during snowmelt in a suburban catchment. Proceedings of the Eastern Snow Conference 49: 1–12Google Scholar
Buttle, JM, Vonk, AM, Taylor, CH. 1995. Applicability of isotope hydrograph separation in a suburban basin during snowmelt. Hydrological Processes 9: 197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttle, JM, Lister, SW, Hill, AR. 2001. Controls on runoff components on a forested slope and implications for N transport. Hydrological Processes 15: 1065–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttle, JM, Hazlett, PW, Murray, CD, Creed, IF, Jeffries, DS, Semkin, R. 2001. Prediction of groundwater characteristics in forested and harvested basins during spring snowmelt using a topographic index. Hydrological Processes 15: 3389–3407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaplot, V, Walter, C, Curmi, P. 2000. Improving soil hydromorphy prediction according to DEM resolution and available pedological data. Geoderma 97: 405–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark ID, Fritz P. 1997. Environmental Isotopes in Hydrogeology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 328 p
Collins, R, Jenkins, A, Harrow, M. 2000. The contribution of old and new water to a storm hydrograph determined by tracer addition to a whole catchment. Hydrological Processes 14: 701–7113.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, LW, Olsen, CR, Solomon, DK, Larsen, IL, Cook, RB, Grebmeier, JM. 1991. Stable isotopes of oxygen and natural and fallout radionuclides used for tracing runoff during snowmelt in an Arctic watershed. Water Resources Research 27: 2171–2179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crayosky, TW, DeWalle, DR, Seybert, TA, Johnson, TE. 1999. Channel precipitation dynamics in a forested Pennsylvania headwater catchment (USA). Hydrological Processes 13: 1303–13143.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dansgaard, W. 1964. Stable isotopes in precipitation. Tellus 16: 436–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWalle, DR, Pionke, HB. 1994. Streamflow generation on a small agricultural catchment during autumn recharge: II. Stormflow periods. Journal of Hydrology 163: 23–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWalle, DR, Swistock, BR. 1994. Differences in oxygen-18 content of throughfall and rainfall in hardwood and coniferous forests. Hydrological Processes 8: 75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWalle, DR, Swistock, BR, Sharpe, WE. 1988. Three component tracer model for stormflow on a small Appalachian forested catchment. Journal of Hydrology 104: 301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWalle, DR, Edwards, PJ, Swistock, BR, Aravena, R, Drimmie, RJ. 1997. Seasonal isotope hydrology of three Appalachian forest catchments. Hydrological Processes 11: 1895–19063.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drever JI. 1988. The Geochemistry of Natural Waters. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 437 p
Elsenbeer, H. 2001. Hydrologic flowpaths in tropical rainforest soilscapes – a review. Hydrological Processes 15: 1751–1759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsenbeer, H, Lack, A. 1996. Hydrometric and hydrochemical evidence for fast flowpaths at LaCuenca, Western Amazonia. Journal of Hydrology 180: 237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsenbeer, H, Lorieri, D, Bonell, M. 1995. Mixing model approaches to estimate stormflow in an overland flow dominated rainforest catchment. Water Resources Research 31: 2267–2278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freer, J, McDonnell, J, Beven, KJ, Brammer, D, Burns, D, Hooper, RP, Kendall, C. 1997. Topographic controls on subsurface storm flow at the hillslope scale for two hydrologically distinct small catchments. Hydrological Processes 11: 1347–13523.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freer, J, McDonnell, JJ, Beven, KJ, Peters, NE, Burns, DA, Hooper, RP, Aulenbach, B, Kendall, C. 2002. The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow. Water Resour. Res., 38(12), 1269 doi:10.1029/2001 WR000872, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genereux, DP. 1998. Quantifying uncertainty in tracer-based hydrograph separations. Water Resources Research 34: 915–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genereux DP, Hooper RP. 1998. Oxygen and hydrogen isotopes in rainfall-runoff studies. In Isotope Tracers in Catchment Hydrology, Kendall C, McDonnell JJ (eds). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 319–346
Gremillion, P, Wanielista, M. 2000. Effects of evaporative enrichment on the stable isotope hydrology of a central Florida (USA) river. Hydrological Processes 14: 1465–14843.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gremillion, P, Gonyeau, A, Wanielista, M. 2000. Application of alternative hydrograph separation models to detect changes in flow paths in a watershed undergoing urban development. Hydrological Processes 14: 1485–15013.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halldin, S, Rodhe, A, Bjurman, B. 1990. Urban storm water transport and wash-off of caesium-137 after the Chernobyl accident. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 49: 139–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewlett JD, Hibbert AR. 1967. Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas. In International Symposium on Forest Hydrology, Sopper WE, Lull HW (eds). Pergamon, New York, NY, 275–290
Hill, AR. 1993. Base cation chemistry of storm runoff in a forested headwater wetland. Water Resources Research 29: 2663–2673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, AR, Waddington, JM. 1993. Analysis of storm run-off sources using oxygen-18 in a headwater swamp. Hydrological Processes 7: 305–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, MJ, Schiff, SL, English, MC. 1994. Examining the contributions of glacial till water to storm runoff using two- and three-component hydrograph separations. Water Resources Research 30: 983–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, RP. 2001. Applying the scientific method to small catchment studies: a review of the Panola Mountain experience. Hydrological Processes 15: 2039–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, RP, Shoemaker, CA. 1986. A comparison of chemical and isotopic hydrograph separation. Water Resources Research 22: 1444–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingraham NL. 1998. Isotopic variations in precipitation. In Isotope Tracers in Catchment Hydrology, Kendall C, McDonnell JJ (eds). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 87–118
Ingraham, NL, Taylor, BE. 1991. Light stable isotope systematics of large-scale hydrologic regimes in California and Nevada. Water Resources Research 27: 77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency. 2001. GNIP maps and animations. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. Accessible at http://isohis.iaea.org
International Atomic Energy Agency/World Meteorological Organization. 2001. Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation. The GNIP Database. Accessible at http://isohis.iaea.org
Joerin, C, Beven, KJ, Iorgulescu, I., Musy, A. 2002. Uncertainty in hydrograph separations based on geochemical mixing models. Journal of Hydrology 255: 90–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall C, Caldwell EA. 1998. Fundamentals of isotope geochemistry. In Isotope Tracers in Catchment Hydrology, Kendall C, McDonnell JJ (eds). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 51–86
Kendall, KA, Shanley, JB, McDonnell, JJ. 1999. A hydrometric and geochemical approach to test the transmissivity feedback hypothesis during snowmelt. Journal of Hydrology 219: 188–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, C, McDonnell, JJ, Gu, W. 2001. A look inside ‘black box’ hydrograph separation models: a study at the Hydrohill catchment. Hydrological Processes 15: 1877–1902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, VC, Kendall, C, Zellweger, GW, Wyerman, TA, Avanzino, RJ. 1986. Determination of the components of stormflow using water chemistry and environmental isotopes, Mattole River basin, California. Journal of Hydrology 84: 107–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, H, Lisheid, G, Hoch, R, Hauhs, M. 1996. Water flow paths and residence times in a small headwater catchment at Gårdsjön, Sweden, during steady state storm flow conditions. Water Resources Research 32: 1689–1698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laudon, H, Hemond, HF, Krouse, R, Bishop, KH. 2002. Oxygen 18 fractionation during snowmelt: Implications for spring flood hydrograph separation. Water Resources Research. 38(11), 1258, doi:10.1029/2002 WR001510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leaney, FW, Smettem, KRJ, Chittleborough, DJ. 1993. Estimating the contribution of preferential flow to subsurface runoff from a hillslope using deuterium and chloride. Journal of Hydrology 147: 83–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, C. H. (2002). Hydrological processes and pathways affected by forest roads: what do we still need to learn?Hydrological Processes, 16: 2901–2904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, JJ. 1990. A rationale for old water discharge through macropores in a steep, humid catchment. Water Resources Research 26: 2821–2832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, JJ, Bonell, M, Stewart, MK, Pearce, AJ. 1990. Deuterium variations in storm rainfall: implications for hydrograph separation. Water Resources Research 26: 455–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, JJ, Stewart, MK, Owens, IF. 1991a. Effect of catchment-scale mixing on stream isotopic response. Water Resources Research 27: 3065–3073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, JJ, Owens, IF, Stewart, MK. 1991b. A case study of shallow flow paths in a steep zero-order basin: A physical-chemical-isotopic analysis. Water Resources Bulletin, 27: 679–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, JJ, Rowe, L, Stewart, M. 1999. A combined tracer-hydrometric approach to assessing the effects of catchment scale on water flowpaths, source and age. International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Publication 258: 265–274Google Scholar
McGlynn, B, McDonnell, JJ. 2003. The role of discrete landscape units in controlling catchment dissolved organic carbon dynamics. Water Resources Research. 39(4), 1090, doi:10.1029/2002 WR0001525, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlynn, B, Seibert, J. 2003. Distributed assessment of contributing area and riparian buffering along stream networks. Water Resources Research. 39(4), 1082, doi:1029/2002 WR0001521, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlynn, BL, McDonnell, JJ, Shanley, JB, Kendall, C. 1999. Riparian zone flowpath dynamics during snowmelt in a small headwater catchment. Journal of Hydrology 222: 75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlynn, B, McDonnell, JJ, Brammer, D. 2002. An evolving perceptual model of hillslope flow in a steep forested humid catchment: A review of the Maimai catchment. Journal of Hydrology 257: 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlynn, B, McDonnell, JJ, Stewart, M, Seibert, J. 2003. On the relationships between catchment scale and streamwater mean residence time. Hydrological Processes. 17(1): 175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, RA, Buttle, JM. 2001. Soil partitioning and surface store controls on spring runoff from a boreal forest peatland basin in north-central Manitoba, Canada. Hydrological Processes 15: 2305–2324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, DR, Dietrich, WE, Torres, R, Anderson, SP, Heffner, JT, Loague, K. 1997. Hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled valley to natural and applied rainfall. Water Resources Research 33: 91–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, RD, Thompson, JC. 1996. Are water table variations in a shallow forest soil consistent with the TOPMODEL concept?Water Research Research 32: 663–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosley, MP. 1979. Streamflow generation in a forested watershed, New Zealand. Water Resources Research 15: 795–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosley, MP. 1982. Subsurface flow velocities through selected forest soils, South Island, New Zealand. Journal of Hydrology 55: 65–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray CD. 2003. Snow accumulation, melt and infiltration on forested and clearcut slopes during spring snowmelt, Turkey Lakes Watershed, central Ontario. MSc thesis, Trent University, 76 pp
Nolan, KM, Hill, BR. 1990. Storm-runoff generation in the Permanente Creek drainage basin, west central California – an example of flood-wave effects on runoff composition. Journal of Hydrology 113: 343–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyberg, L. 1995. Water flow path interactions with soil hydraulic properties in till soil at Gårdsjön, Sweden. Journal of Hydrology 170: 255–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogunkoya, OO, Jenkins, A. 1993. Analysis of storm hydrograph and flow pathways using a three-component hydrograph separation model. Journal of Hydrology 142: 71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, AJ. 1990. Streamflow generation processes: an Austral view. Water Resources Research 26: 3037–3047Google Scholar
Pearce, AJ, Stewart, MK, Sklash, MG. 1986. Storm runoff generation in humid headwater catchments. 1. Where does the water come from?Water Resources Research 22: 1263–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, DL, Buttle, JM, Taylor, CH, LaZerte, BD. 1995. Runoff production in a forested, shallow soil, Canadian Shield basin. Water Resources Research 31: 1291–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, K, Hornberger, G. 1998. Comparison of hydrochemical tracers to estimate source contributions to peak flow in a small, forested headwater catchment. Water Resources Research 34: 1755–1766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richey, DG, McDonnell, JJ, Erbe, M, Hurd, T. 1998. A critical appraisal of published chemical and isotopic hydrograph separations from New Zealand, North America and Europe. Journal of Hydrology (New Zealand) 37: 95–111Google Scholar
Robson, A, Beven, K, Neal, C. 1992. Towards identifying sources of subsurface flow: a comparison of components identified by a physically based runoff model and those determined by chemical mixing techniques. Hydrological Processes 6: 199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodhe A. 1998. Snowmelt-dominated systems. In Isotope Tracers in Catchment Hydrology, Kendall C, McDonnell JJ (eds)., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 391–433
Rodhe A. 1987. The origin of streamwater traced by oxygen-18. PhD. Thesis, Department of Physical Geography, Division of Hydrology, Report Series A 41, Uppsala University, 260 p + appendices
Rodhe, A, Nyberg, L, Bishop, K. 1996. Transit times for water in a small till catchment from a step shift in the oxygen 18 content of the water input. Water Resources Research 32: 3497–3511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, RK. 1986. Estimation of canopy reservoir capacity and oxygen-18 fractionation in throughfall in a pine forest. Nordic Hydrology 17: 251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibert, J. and McDonnell, JJ. 2002. On the dialog between experimentalist and modeller in catchment hydrology: Use of soft data for multi-criteria model calibration. Water Resources Research. 38(11): 1241, doi:10.1029/2001 WR000978, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibert, J, Bishop, KH, Nyberg, L. 1997. A test of TOPMODEL's ability to predict spatially distributed groundwater levels. Hydrological Processes 11: 1131–11443.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanley, J, Kendall, C, Smith, T, Wolock, D, McDonnell, JJ. 2002. Controls on old and new water contributions to stream flow at some nested catchments in Vermont, USA. Hydrological Processes 16: 589–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sklash MG. 1990. Environmental isotope studies of storm and snowmelt runoff generation. In Process Studies in Hillslope Hydrology, Anderson MG, Burt TP (eds). Wiley, Chichester, UK, 401–435
Sklash, MG, Farvolden, RN. 1979. The role of groundwater in storm runoff. Journal of Hydrology 43: 45–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sklash, MG, Farvolden, RN, Fritz, P. 1976. A conceptual model of watershed response to rainfall, developed through the use of oxygen-18 as a natural tracer. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 13:271–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sklash, MG, Stewart, MK, Pearce, AJ. 1986. Storm runoff generation in humid headwater catchments, 2. A case study of hillslope and low-order stream response. Water Resources Research 22: 1273–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuttleworth, J. 2002. Some thoughts on remote sensing versus extrapolation. Hydrological Processes 16: 2037–2040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, MS, Gburek, WJ, Hamlett, JM. 2002. Dynamics of stormflow generation on a hillslope – a hillslope-scale field study in east-central Pennsylvania, USA. Hydrological Processes 16: 649–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, R, Dietrich, WE, Montgomery, DR, Anderson, SP, Loague, K. 1998. Unsaturated zone processes and the hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled catchment. Water Resources Research 34: 1865–1879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turton, DJ, Barnes, DR, Jesus Navar, J. 1995. Old and new water in subsurface flow from a forest soil block. Journal of Environmental Quality 24: 139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlenbrook S. 1999. Examination and modeling of runoff generation in a mesoscaled basin. PhD thesis, Institute of Hydrology, University of Freiburg
Uhlenbrook, S, Leibundgut, C. 2002. Process-oriented catchment modelling and multiple-response validation. Hydrological Processes 16: 423–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlenbrook, S, McDonnell, JJ, Leibundgut, C. 2002. Runoff generation and implications for river basin modelling. Hydrological Processes 17(2) (Special Issue): 197–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unnikrishna, PV, McDonnell, JJ, and Kendall, C. (2002). Isotope variations in a Sierra Nevada snowpack and their relation to meltwater. Journal of Hydrology 260(1–4): 38–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unnikrishna, PV, McDonnell, JJ, Tarboton, D, Kendall, C. In press. Snowmelt runoff response of a small semi-arid catchment. Journal of Hydrology
Welker, JM. 2000. Isotopic (δ18O) characteristics of weekly precipitation collected across the USA: an initial analysis with application to water source studies. Hydrological Processes 14: 1449–14643.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wels, C, Cornett, RJ, LaZerte, BD. 1991. Hydrograph separation: a comparison of geochemical and isotopic tracers. Journal of Hydrology 122: 253–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsch, DL, Kroll, CN, McDonnell, JJ, Burns, DA. 2001. Topographic controls on the chemistry of subsurface stormflow. Hydrological Processes 15: 1925–1938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williard, KWJ, DeWalle, DR, Edwards, PJ, Sharpe, WE. 2001. 18O isotopic separation of stream nitrate sources in mid-Appalachian forested watersheds. Journal of Hydrology 252: 174–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, GV, Jardine, PM, Luxmoore, RJ, Jones, JR. 1990. Hydrology of a forested hillslope during storm events. Geoderma 46: 119–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolman, MG. 1967. A cycle of sedimentation and erosion in urban river channels. Geografiska Annaler 49A: 385–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, AD, Giambelluca, TW. 1997. Importance of rural roads as source areas for runoff in mountainous areas of northern Thailand. Journal of Hydrology 196: 204–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, A, Giambelluca, T, Sutherland, RA, Vana, T, Nullet, M. 2001. Horton overland flow contribution to runoff on unpaved mountain roads: A case study in Northern Thailand. Hydrological Processes 15: 3203–3208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollweg JA. 1996. Field study to support hydrologic modeling and analysis of watershed function at the microscale. In Proceedings of the AWRA Annual Symposium, Watershed Restoration Management: Physical, Chemical, and Biological Considerations, McDonnell JJ, Stribling JB, Neville LR, Leopold DJ (eds). American Water Resources Association, Herndon, VA, 129–134

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×