Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T22:21:39.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Ecophysiology of sulphate-reducing bacteria in environmental biofilms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2009

Larry L. Barton
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
W. Allan Hamilton
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are a phylogenetically and physiologically diverse group of bacteria, characterized by their versatile metabolic capability to use various electron acceptors and donors (Widdel, 1988). SRB are therefore universally distributed in diverse environments and play significant ecophysiological roles in anaerobic biomineralization pathways. The degradation of organic matter by a complex microbial community is governed to a large extent by available electron acceptors. The terminal stages of the anaerobic mineralization of organic matter is catalyzed by SRB and methanogens, and their competitive and cooperative interactions have been described previously (Oude Elferink et al., 1994).

Typical domestic wastewaters contain sulphate concentrations of 100–1000 μM and relatively low dissolved oxygen due to the lower solubility and rapid depletion of this gas by biological activity. Thus, sulphate reduction can be the dominant terminal electron accepting process and account for up to 50% of mineralization of organic matter in wastewater biofilms (Kühl and Jorgensen, 1992; Okabe et al., 2003a). Multiple electron donors and electron acceptors are present in the wastewaters. As a result, wastewater biofilms are very complex multispecies biofilms, displaying considerable heterogeneity, with regard to both the microorganisms present and their physicochemical microenvironments. Sulphate reduction is anticipated to take place in the deeper anoxic biofilm strata even though the bulk liquid is oxygenated. It is, therefore, thought that a successive vertical zonation of respiratory processes can be found in aerobic wastewater biofilms with a typical thickness of only a few millimeters (Ito et al., 2002b; Kühl and Jorgensen, 1992; Okabe et al., 1999a; 2003a; Ramsing et al., 1993).

Type
Chapter
Information
Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria
Environmental and Engineered Systems
, pp. 359 - 382
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, L. A. (1929). The effect of nitro-compounds and some other substances on production of hydrogen sulphide by sulphate-reducing bacteria in sewage. Proc Soc Appl Bacteriol, 2, 26–38Google Scholar
Amann, R. and Ludwig, W. (2000). Ribosomal RNA-targeted nucleic acid probes for studies in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 24, 555–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amann, R. I., Ludwig, W. and Schleifer, K.-H. (1995). Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev, 59, 143–69Google ScholarPubMed
Amann, R. and Kühl, M. (1998). In situ methods for assessment of microorganisms and their activities. Curr Opin Microbiol, 1, 352–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amann, R. I., Stomley, J., Devereux, R. K. and Stahl, D. A. (1992). Molecular and microscopic identification of sulphate-reducing bacteria in multispecies biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol, 58, 614–23Google Scholar
Boone, D. R. and Bryant, M. P. (1980). Propionate-degrading bacterium, Syntrophobacter wolinii sp. nov. gen. nov., from methanogenic ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol, 40, 626–32Google ScholarPubMed
Buisman, C., Ijspeert, P., Janssen, A. and Lettinga, G. (1990). Kinetics of chemical and biological sulphide oxidation in aqueous solutions. Wat Res, 24, 667–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canfield, D. E. and Des Marais, D. J. (1991). Aerobic sulphate reduction in microbial mats. Science, 251, 1471–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, K. Y. and Morris, J. C. (1972). Kinetics of oxidation of aqueous sulfide by O2. Environ Sci Technol, 6, 529–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dannenberg, S., Kroder, M., Dilling, W. and Cypionka, H. (1992). Oxidation of H2, organic compounds and inorganic sulfur compounds coupled to reduction of O2 or nitrate by sulphate-reducing bacteria. Arch Microbiol, 158, 93–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, R., Kane, M. D., Winfrey, J. and Stahl, D. A. (1992). Genus- and group-specific hybridization probes for determinative and environmental studies of sulphate-reducing bacteria. System Appl Microbiol, 15, 601–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, R., Delaney, M., Widdel, F. and Stahl, D. A. (1989). Natural relationships among sulphate-reducing eubacteria. J Bacteriol, 171, 6689–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, R. and Stahl, D. A. (1993). Phylogeny of sulphate-reducing bacteria and a perspective for analyzing their natural communities. In Odom, J. M. and Singleton, R.. (eds.), The sulphate-reducing bacteria: contemporary perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 131–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eary, L. E. and J. A. Schramke. (1990). Rates of inorganic oxidation reactions involving dissolved oxygen. In Melchior, D. C. and Basset, R. L. (eds.), Chemical modeling of aqueous systems II. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. pp. 379–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frund, C. and Cohen, Y. (1992). Diurnal cycles of sulphate reduction under oxic conditions in cyanobacterial mats. Appl Environ Microbiol, 58, 70–7Google Scholar
Fukui, M., Teske, A., Assmus, B., Muyzer, G. and Widdel, F. (1999). Physiology, phylogenetic relationships, and ecology of filamentous sulphate-reducing bacteria (genus Desulfonema). Arch Microbiol, 172, 193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. A. (1985). Sulphate-reducing bacteria and anaerobic corrosion. Ann Rev Microbiol, 35, 195–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. A. (2003). Microbially influenced corrosion as a model system for the study of metal microbe interactions: a unifying electron transfer hypothesis. Biofouling, 19, 65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. A. and Lee, W. (1995). Biocorrosion. In Barton, L. L. (ed.), Sulphate-reducing bacteria. Biotechnology Handbooks 8. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 243–62.Google Scholar
Harmsen, H. J. M., Akkermans, A. D. L., Stams, A. J. M. and Vos, W. M. (1996). Population dynamics of propionate-oxidizing bacteria under methanogenic and sulfidogenic conditions in anaerobic granular sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol, 62, 2163–8Google ScholarPubMed
Head, I. M., Saunders, J. R. and Pickup, R. W. (1998). Microbial evolution, diversity and ecology: a decade of ribosomal RNA analysis of uncultured microorganisms. Microb Ecol, 35, 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heppner, B., Zellner, G. and Diekmann, H. (1992). Start-up and operation of a propionate-degrading fluidized-bed reactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 36, 810–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, T., Nielsen, J. L., Okabe, S., Watanabe, Y. and Nielsen, P. H. (2002a). Phylogenetic identification and substrate uptake patterns of sulphate-reducing bacteria inhabiting an oxic-anoxic sewer biofilm determined by combining microautoradiography and fluorescent in situ hybridization. Appl Environ Microbiol, 68, 356–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, T., Okabe, S., Satoh, H. and Watanabe, Y. (2002b). Successional development of sulphate-reducing bacterial populations and their activities in a wastewater biofilm growing under microaerophilic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol, 68, 1392–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, T., Sugita, K. and Okabe, S. (2004). Isolation, characterization and in situ detection of a novel chemolithoautotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacterium in wastewater biofilms growing under microaerophilic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol, 70, 3122–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ito, T., Sugita, K., Yumoto, I., Nodasaka, Y. and Okabe, S. (2005). Thiovirga sulfuroxydans gen. nov., sp. nov., a chemolithotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacterium isolated from a microaerophilic waste-water biofilm. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 55, 1059–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, A. J. H., Sleyster, R., Kaa, C.et al. (1995). Biological sulphide oxidation in a fed-batch reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng, 47, 327–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenneman, G. E., McInerney, M. J. and Knapp, R. M. (1986). Effect of nitrate on biogenic sulfide production. Appl Environ Microbiol, 51, 1205–11Google ScholarPubMed
Jørgensen, B. B. (1978). A comparison of methods for the quantification of bacterial sulphate reduction in coastal marine sediments. III. Estimation from chemical and bacteriological field data. Geomicrobiol J, 1, 49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, B. B. (1982). Ecology of the bacteria of the sulphur cycle with special reference to anoxic–oxic interface environments. Phil Trans R Soc Lond, 298, 543–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kühl, M. and Jørgensen, B. B. (1992). Microsensor measurement of sulphate reduction and sulfide oxidation in compact microbial communities of aerobic biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol, 58, 1164–74Google Scholar
Lee, N., Nielsen, P. H., Andreasen, K. H.et al. (1999). Combination of fluorescent in situ hybridization and microautoradiography – a new tool for structure-function analyses in microbial ecology. Appl Environ Microbiol, 65, 1289–97Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, W., Lewandowski, Z., Characklis, W. G. and Nielsen, P. H. (1994). Microbial corrosion of mild steel in a biofilm system. In Geesey, G.G.Lewandowski, Z. and Flemming, H.-C. (eds.), Biofouling and biocorrosion in industrial water systems. Lewis Publishers, Plenum Press, CRC Press, Inc., Florida, pp. 205–12.Google Scholar
Lovley, D. R. and Phillips, E. J. P. (1994). Novel processes for anaerobic sulphate production from elemental sulfur by sulphate-reducing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol, 60, 2394–9Google Scholar
Loy, A., Lehner, A., Lee, N.et al. (2002). Oligonucleotide microarray for 16S rRNA gene-based detection of all recognized lineages of sulphate-reducing prokaryotes in the environment. Appl Environ Microbiol, 68, 5064–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manz, W., Eisenbrecher, M., Neu, T. R. and Szewzyk, U. (1998). Abundance and spatial organization of Gram-negative sulphate-reducing bacteria in activated sludge investigated by in situ probing with specific 16S rRNA targeted oligonucleotides. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 25, 43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minz, D., Fishbain, S., Green, S. J.et al. (1999a). Unexpected population distribution in a microbial mat community: sulphate-reducing bacteria localized to the highly oxic chemocline in contrast to a eukaryotic preference for anoxia. Appl Environ Microbiol, 65, 4659–65Google Scholar
Minz, D., Flax, J. L., Green, S. J.et al. (1999b). Diversity of sulphate-reducing bacteria in oxic and anoxic regions of a microbial mat characterized by comparative analysis of dissimilatory sulfite reductase genes. Appl Environ Microbiol, 65: 4666–71Google Scholar
Nielsen, P. H., Lee, W., Lewandowski, Z., Morison, M. and Characklis, W. G. (1993). Corrosion of mild steel in an alternating oxic and anoxic biofilm system. Biofouling, 7, 267–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsker, N. H., Nielsen, P. H. and Hvitved-Jacobsen, T. (1995). Influence of oxygen on biofilm growth and potential sulphate reduction in gravity sewer biofilm. Wat Sci Tech, 31(7), 159–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okabe, S., Itoh, T., Satoh, H. and Watanabe, Y. (1999a). Analyses of spatial distributions of sulphate-reducing bacteria and their activity in aerobic wastewater biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol, 65, 5107–16Google Scholar
Okabe, S., Ito, T. and Satoh, H. (2003a). Sulphate-reducing bacterial community structure, function and their contribution to carbon mineralization in a wastewater biofilm growing microaerophilic conditions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 63, 322–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okabe, S., Ito, T., Satoh, H. and Watanabe, Y. (2003b). Effect of nitrite and nitrate on biogenic sulfide production in sewer biofilms as determined by use of microelectrodes. Water Science and Technology, 47, 281–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okabe, S., Ito, T., Sugita, K. and Satoh, H. (2005). Succession of internal sulfur cycle and sulfide-oxidizing bacterial community in microaerophilic wastewater biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol, 71, 2520–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okabe, S., Santegoeds, C. and Beer, D. (2003c). Effect of nitrite and nitrate on in situ sulfide production in an activated sludge immobilized agar film as determined by use of microelectrodes. Biotechnol Bioeng, 81, 570–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okabe, S., Satoh, H. and Watanabe, Y. (1999b). In situ analysis of nitrifying biofilms as determined by in situ hybridization and the use of microelectrodes. Appl Environ Microbiol, 65, 3182–91Google Scholar
Oude Elferink, S. J. W. H., Visser, A., Hulshoff Pol, L. W. and Stams, A. J. M. (1994). Sulphate reduction in methanogenic bioreactors. FEMS Microbiol Rev, 15, 119–36Google Scholar
Oude Elferink, S. J. W. H., Vorstman, W. J. C., Sopjes, A. and Stams, A. J. M. (1998). Characterization of the sulphate-reducing and syntrophic population in granular sludge from a full-scale anaerobic reactor treating papermill wastewater. FEMS Microbiol Ecology, 27, 185–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouverney, C. C. and Fuhrman, J. A. (1999). Combined microautoradiography-16S rRNA probe technique for determination of radioisotope uptake by specific microbial cell types in situ. Appl Environ Microbiol, 65, 1746–52Google ScholarPubMed
Postgate, J. R. (1984). The sulphate-reducing bactera, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ramsing, N. B., Kühl, M. and Jørgensen, B. B. (1993). Distribution of sulphate-reducing bacteria, O2, and H2S in photosynthetic biofilms determined by oligonucleotide probe and microelectrodes. Appl Environ Microbiol, 59, 3840–9Google Scholar
Rabus, R., Fukui, M., Wilkes, H. and Widdel, F. (1996). Degradative capacities and 16S rRNA-targeted whole cell hybridization of sulphate-reducing bacteria in an anaerobic environment culture utilizing alkylbenzenes from crude oil. Appl Environ Microbiol, 62, 3605–13Google Scholar
Risatti, J. B., Capman, W. C. and Stahl, D. A. (1994). Community structure of a microbial mat: the phylogenetic dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 91, 10173–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santegoeds, C. M., Damgaard, L. R., Hesselink, G.et al. (1999). Distribution of sulphate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria in anaerobic aggregates determined by microsensor and molecular analyses. Appl Environ Microbiol, 65, 4618–29Google Scholar
Santegoeds, C. M., Ferdelman, T. G., Muyzer, G. and Beer, D. (1998). Structural and functional dynamics of sulphate-reducing populations in bacterial biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol, 64, 3731–9Google Scholar
Schramm, A. (2003). In situ analysis of structure and activity of the nitrifying community in biofilms, aggregate, and sediments. Geomicrobiol J, 20, 313–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schramm, A., Larsen, L. H., Revsbech, N. P., Amann, R. and Schleifer, K.-H. (1996). Structure and function of a nitrifying biofilm as determined by in situ hybridization and the use of microelectrodes. Appl Environ Microbiol, 62, 4641–7Google ScholarPubMed
Schramm, A., Santegoeds, C. M., Nielsen, H. K.et al. (1999). On the occurrence of anoxic microniches, denitrification, and sulphate reduction in aerated activated sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol, 65, 4189–96Google Scholar
Widdel, F. (1988). Microbiology and ecology of sulphate- and sulfur-reducing bacteria. In Zehnder, A. J. B. (ed.), Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, pp. 469–585.Google Scholar
Widdel, F. and Pfenning, N. (1982). Studies on dissimilatory sulphate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids II. Incomplete oxidation of propionate by Desulfobulbus propionicus gen. nov., sp. nov.Arch. Microbiol, 131, 360–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, W.-M., Jain, M. K., Conway de Macario, E., Thiele, J. H. and Zeikus, J. G. (1992). Microbial composition and characterization of prevalent methanogens and acetogens isolated from syntrophic methanogenic granules. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 38, 282–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×