Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T15:00:55.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Is diversity of mycorrhizal fungi important for ecosystem functioning?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2009

By
J. R. Leake ,
D. Johnson ,
D. P. Donnelly ,
L. Boddy  and
D. J. Read
Edited by
Richard Bardgett ,
Michael Usher  and
David Hopkins
J. R. Leake
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
D. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
D. P. Donnelly
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
L. Boddy
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
D. J. Read
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Richard Bardgett
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Michael Usher
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
David Hopkins
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
Get access

Summary

SUMMARY

  1. Globally accelerating rates of species loss make it imperative that relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem function are analysed, yet resolution of these interactions has presented one of the most intractable challenges in ecological research.

  2. Because biodiversity in soil is considerably greater than that above ground, and the identities and functions of many soil microorganisms are uncharacterised, the difficulties involved in establishing diversity–function relationships in the below-ground environment are compounded.

  3. For some keystone groups of soil microorganisms, prominent among which are the mycorrhizal fungi, diversity–function relationships are starting to be elucidated. Mycorrhizal symbionts are present in virtually all terrestrial ecosystems where they are major components of the soil microbial biomass.

  4. There is increasing evidence that mycorrhizal diversity is of central importance in agro-ecosystem functioning, and that intensification of agriculture and forestry, combined with air and soil pollution, is reducing their diversity and compromising their functioning. Two lines of evidence support the case that mycorrhizal diversity is of major functional significance, namely (1) that mycorrhizal associations are multi-functional and exhibit complementarity, assisting plants in nutrient acquisition, mediating carbon transfer between plants and protecting their roots from pathogens; and (2) that on the basis of emerging evidence of a combination of high specificity and dependency in many mycorrhizal associations, especially those involving myco-heterotrophic plants, it is hypothesised that the extent of functional ‘redundancy’ is low.

Introduction

It is now recognised that the accelerating rates of species extinctions, which are arising from progressive intensification of land use, pose a global threat to biodiversity (Pimm et al. 1995).

Type
Chapter
Information
Biological Diversity and Function in Soils , pp. 216 - 235
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agerer, R. (2001). Exploration types of ectomycorrhizae: a proposal to classify ectomycorrhizal mycelial systems according to their patterns of differentiation and putative ecological significance. Mycorrhiza, 11, 107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, E. B., Allen, M. F., Helm, D. J., et al. (1995). Patterns and regulation of mycorrhizal plant and fungal diversity. Plant and Soil, 170, 47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, J. W. & Dighton, J. (2001). Ectomycorrhizal diversity alters growth and nutrient acquisition of gray birch (Betula populifolia) seedlings in host-symbiont culture conditions. New Phytologist, 152, 139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bever, J. D. (2002). Host-specificity of AM fungal population growth rates can generate feedback on plant growth. Plant and Soil, 244, 281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bever, J. D., Schulze, P. A., Pringle, A. & Morton, J. B. (2001). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: more diverse than meets the eye, and the ecological tale of why. BioScience, 51, 923–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianciotto, V., Lumini, E., Lanfranco, L., et al. (2000). Detection and identification of bacterial endosymbionts in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi belonging to the family Gigasporaceae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 4503–4509CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bidartondo, M. I., Redecker, D., Hijri, I., et al. (2002). Epiparasitic plants specialized on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature, 419, 389–392CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolan, N. S. (1991). A critical review on the role of mycorrhizal fungi in the uptake of phosphorus by plants. Plant and Soil, 134, 189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buscot, F., Munch, J. C., Charcosset, J. Y., et al. (2000). Recent advances in exploring physiology and biodiversity of ectomycorrhizas highlight the functioning of these symbioses in ecosystems. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 24, 601–614CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakravarty, P., Khasa, D., Dancik, B., et al. (1999). Integrated control of Fusarium damping-off in conifer seedlings. Zeitschrift Für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschultz, 106, 342–352Google Scholar
Chatzinotas, A., Sandaa, R. A., Schonhuber, W., et al. (1998). Analysis of broad-scale differences in microbial community composition of two pristine forest soils. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 21, 579–587CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis, T. P., Sloan, W. T. & Scannell, J. W. (2002). Estimating prokaryotic diversity and its limits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 10 494–10 499CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dahlberg, A., Jonsson, L. & Nylund, J.-E. (1997). Species diversity and distribution of biomass above- and below-ground among ectomycorrhizal fungi in an old-growth Norway spruce forest in south Sweden. Canadian Journal of Botany, 75, 1323–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickie, I. A., Xu, B. & Koide, R. T. (2002). Vertical niche differentiation of ectomycorrhizal hyphae in soil as shown by T-RFLP. New Phytologist, 156, 527–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, J. C., Boddington, C. L., Rodriguez, A., Gonzalez-Chavez, C. & Mansur, I. (2000). Mycelium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) from different genera: form, function and detection. Plant and Soil, 226, 131–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egerton-Warburton, L. M. & Allen, E. B. (2000). Shifts in arbuscular mycorrhizal communities along an anthropogenic nitrogen deposition gradient. Ecological Applications, 10, 484–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egerton-Warburton, L. M., Graham, R. C., Allen, E. B. & Allen, M. F. (2001). Reconstruction of the historical changes in mycorrhizal fungal communities under anthropogenic nitrogen deposition. Proceedings of The Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 268, 2479–2484CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erland, S. & Taylor, A. F. S. (2002). Diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in relation to the abiotic environment. Mycorrhizal Ecology (Ed. by. , M. G. A. van der Heijden & , I. Sanders), pp. 163–200. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
Francis, R. & Read, D. J. (1995). Mutualism and antagonism in the mycorrhizal symbiosis, with special reference to impacts on plant community structure. Canadian Journal of Botany, 73, 1301–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbaye, J. (1994). Helper bacteria: a new dimension to the mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytologist, 128, 197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, B. S., Ritz, K., Bardgett, R. D., et al. (2000). Ecosystem response of pasture soil communities to fumigation-induced microbial diversity reductions: an examination of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship. Oikos, 90, 279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grime, J. P. (2001). Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes and Ecosystem Properties, 2nd edition. Chichester: WileyGoogle Scholar
Grime, J. P., Mackey, J. M. L., Hillier, S. H. & Read, D. J. (1987). Floristic diversity in a model system using experimental microcosms. Nature, 328, 420–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagerman, S. H., Sakakibara, S. M. & , Durall D. M. (2001). The potential for woody understory plants to provide refuge for ectomycorrhizal inoculum at an interior Douglas-fir forest after clear-cutting. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31, 711–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, J. L. & Smith, S. E. (1983). Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Hart, M. M. & Klironomos J. N. (2002). Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and ecosystem functioning. Mycorrhizal Ecology (Ed. by , M. G. A. van der Heijden & , I. Sanders), pp. 225–242. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
Hector, A., Schmid, B., Beierkuhnlein, C., et al. (1999). Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science, 286, 1123–1127CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helgason, T., Daniell, T. J., Husband, R., Fitter, A. H. & Young, J. P. W. (1998). Ploughing up the wood-wide web?Nature, 394, 431CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendrix, J. W., Guo, B. Z. & An, Z.-Q. (1995). Divergence of mycorrhizal fungal communities in crop production systems. Plant and Soil, 170, 131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbert, D. S., Gilbert, L.-B. & Donoghie, M. J. (2000). Evolutionary instability of ectomycorrhizal symbioses in basidiomycetes. Nature, 407, 506–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Högberg, M. N. & Högberg, P. (2002). Extramatrical ectomycorrhizal mycelium contributes one-third of microbial biomass and produces, together with associated roots, half the dissolved organic carbon in a forest soil. New Phytologist, 154, 791–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, T. R. & Bruns, T. D. (2001). The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: peeking into the black-box. Molecular Ecology, 10, 1855–1871CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husband, R., Herre, E. A., Turner, S. L., Gallery, R. & Young, J. P. Y. (2002). Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and patterns of host association over time and space in a tropical forest. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2669–2678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huston, M. A. (1997). Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia, 110, 449–460CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jakobsen, I., Abbott, L. & Robson, A. D. (1992). External hyphae of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Trifolium subterraneum L: I. Spread of hyphae and phosphorus inflow into roots. New Phytologist, 120, 371–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansa, J., Mozafar, A., Anken, T., et al. (2002). Diversity and structure of AMF communities as affected by tillage in a temperate soil. Mycorrhiza, 12, 225–234Google Scholar
Jones, M. D., Durall, D. M. & Cairney, J. W. G. (2003). Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in young forest stands regenerating after clearcut logging. New Phytologist, 157, 399–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, L. M., Nilsson, M. C., Wardle, D. A. & Zackrisson, O. (2001). Context dependent effects of ectomycorrhizal species richness on tree seedling productivity. Oikos, 93, 353–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kranabetter, J. M. & Friesen, J. (2002). Ectomycorrhizal community structure on western hemlock seedlings transplanted from forests into openings. Canadian Journal of Botany, 80, 861–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kranabetter, J. M. & Wylie, T. (1998). Ectomycorrhizal community structure across forest openings on naturally regenerated western hemlock seedlings. Canadian Journal of Botany, 76, 189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leake, J. R. (1994). The biology of myco-heterotrophic (“saprophytic”) plants. New Phytologist, 127, 171–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leake, J. R. (2001). Is diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi important for ecosystem function?New Phytologist, 152, 1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leake, J. R. & Read, D. J. (1997). Mycorrhizal fungi in terrestrial habitats. The Mycota, Vol. IV, Environmental and Microbial Relationships (Ed. by , D. T. Wicklow & , B. Söderström), pp. 281–301. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
Leake, J. R., Donnelly, D. P., Saunders, E. M., Boddy, L. & Read, D. J. (2001). Rates and quantities of carbon flux to ectomycorrhizal mycelium following 14C pulse labelling of Pinus sylvestris L. seedlings: effects of litter patches and interaction with a wood-decomposer fungus. Tree Physiology, 21, 71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leake, J. R., Donnelly, D. P. & Boddy, L. (2002). Interactions between ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungi. Mycorrhizal Ecology (Ed. by , M. G. A. van der Heijden & , I. Sanders), pp. 345–372. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P., et al. (2001). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science, 294, 804–808CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luoma, D. L., Eberhart, J. L. & Amaranthus, M. P. (1997). Biodiversity of ectomycorrhizal types from southwest Oregon. Conservation and Management of Native Plants and Fungi (Ed. by , T. N. Kaye, , A. Liston, , R. M. Loveet al.), pp. 249–253. Corvallis, OR: Native Plant Society of Oregon
McKendrick, S. L., Leake, J. R., Taylor, D. L. & Read, D. J. (2000). Symbiotic germination and development of myco-heterotrophic plants in nature: ontogeny of Corallorhiza trifida Châtel and characterisation of its mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist, 145, 523–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKendrick, S. L., Leake, J. R., Taylor, D. L. & Read, D. J. (2002). Symbiotic germination and development of the myco-heterotrophic orchid Neottia nidis-avis in nature and its requirement for locally distributed Sebacina spp. New Phytologist, 154, 233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meharg, A. A. & Cairney, J. W. G. (2000). Co-evolution of mycorrhizal symbionts and their hosts to metal-contaminated environments. Advances in Ecological Research, 30, 69–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina, R., Massicotte, H. & Trappe, J. M. (1992). Specificity phenomena in mycorrhizal symbioses: community–ecological consequences and practical implications. Mycorrhizal Functioning (Ed. by , M. F. Allen), pp. 357–423. London: Chapman and Hall
Nåsholm, T., Ekblad, A., Nordin, A., et al. (1998). Boreal forest plants take up organic nitrogen. Nature, 392, 914–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northup, R. R., Zengshou, Y., Dahlgren, R. A. & Vogt, K. A. (1995). Polyphenol control of nitrogen release from pine litter. Nature, 377, 227–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfisterer, A. B. & Schmid, B. (2002). Diversity-dependent production can decrease the stability of ecosystem functioning. Nature, 416, 84–86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pimm, S. L., Russell, G. J., Gittleman, J. L. & Brooks, T. M. (1995). The future of biodiversity. Science, 269, 347–350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preston, C. D., Pearman, D. A. & Dines, T. D. (2002). New Atlas of the British and Irish Flora. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Read, D. J. (2002). Towards ecological relevance: progress and pitfalls in the path towards an understanding of mycorrhizal functions in nature. Mycorrhizal Ecology (Ed. by , M. G. A. van der Heijden & , I. Sanders), pp. 3–29. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
Read, D. J. & Perez-Moreno, J. (2003). Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems: a journey towards relevance?New Phytologist, 157, 475–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redecker, D. (2002). Molecular identification and phylogeny of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant and Soil, 244, 67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remy, W., Taylor, T. N., Hass, H. & Kerp, H. (1994). Four hundred million year old vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 91, 11 841–11 843CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rillig, M. C., Wright, S. F. & Eviner, V. T. (2002). The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and glomalin in soil aggregation: comparing effects of five plant species. Plant and Soil, 238, 325–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sait, M., Hugenholtz, P. & Janssen, P. H. (2002). Cultivation of globally distributed soil bacteria from phylogenetic lineages previously only detected in cultivation independent surveys. Environmental Microbiology, 4, 654–666CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, I. (2002). Specificity in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mycorrhizal Ecology (Ed. by , M. G. A. van der Heijden & , I. Sanders), pp. 415–437. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
Schulze, E.-D., Högberg, P., van Oene, H., et al. (2000). Interactions between the carbon and nitrogen cycles and the role of biodiversity: a synopsis of a study along a north–south transect through Europe. Ecological Studies 142: Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling in European Forest Ecosystems (Ed. by , E.-D. Schulze), pp. 468–491. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
Simard, S. W., Jones, M. D. & Durall, D. M. (2002). Carbon and nutrient fluxes within and between mycorrhizal plants. Mycorrhizal Ecology (Ed. by , M. G. A. van der Heijden & , I. Sanders), pp. 34–74. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
Smith, S. E. & Read, D. J. (1997). Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 2nd edition. London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A. F. S., Martin, F. & Read, D. J. (2000). Fungal diversity in ectomycorrhizal communities of Norway Spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst) and Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) along north–south transects in Europe. Ecological Studies 142: Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling in European Forest Ecosystems (Ed. by , E.-D. Schulze), pp. 343–365. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
Taylor, A. F. S. (2002). Fungal diversity in ectomycorrhizal communities: sampling effort and species detection. Plant and Soil, 244, 19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D. L., Bruns, T. D., Leake, J. R. & Read, D. J. (2002). Mycorrhizal specificity and function in myco-heterotrophic plants. Mycorrhizal Ecology (Ed. by , M. G. A. van der Heijden & , I. Sanders), pp. 374–413. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag
Tibbett, M., Sanders, F. E., Cairney, J. W. G. & Leake, J. R. (1999). Temperature regulation of extracellular proteases in ectomycorrhizal fungi (Hebeloma spp.) grown in axenic culture. Mycological Research, 103, 707–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D. (1999). Ecological consequences of biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology, 80, 1455–1474Google Scholar
Vandenkoornhuyse, P., Husband, R., Daniell, T. J., et al. (2002). Arbuscular mycorrhizal community composition associated with two plant species in a grassland ecosystem. Molecular Ecology, 11, 1555–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heijden, M. G. A., Klironomos, J. N., Ursic, M., et al. (1998). Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature, 396, 69–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heijden, M. G. A., Wiemken, A. & Sanders, I. R. (2003). Different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter coexistence and resource distribution between co-occurring plant. New Phytologist, 157, 569–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, C. M. & Trappe, J. M. (1993). Names and epithets in the Glomales and Endogonales. Mycological Research, 97, 339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallenda, T. & Kottke, I. (1998). Nitrogen deposition and ectomycorrhiza. New Phytologist, 139, 169–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardle, D. A. (1999). Is ‘sampling effect’ a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships?Oikos, 87, 403–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1992). The Diversity of Life. London: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×