Abbott, K. I., and Green, P.. 2007. Collapse of an ant–scale mutualism in a rainforest on Christmas Island. Oikos 116:1238–1246.Google Scholar

Abrams, P. A., and Matsuda, H.. 1996. Positive indirect effects between prey species that share predators. Ecology 77:610–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abrams, P. A., and Wilson, W. G.. 2004. Coexistence of competitors in metacommunities due to spatial variation in resource growth rates; does R∗ predict the outcome of competition?Ecology Letters 7:929–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abrams, P. A., Holt, R. D., and Roth, J. D.. 1998. Apparent competition or apparent mutualism? Shared predation when populations cycle. Ecology 79:201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Addicott, J. F. 1978a. Competition for mutualists – aphids and ants. Canadian Journal of Zoology 56:2093–2096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Addicott, J. F. 1978b. The population dynamics of aphids on fireweed: a comparison of local populations and metapopulations. Canadian Journal of Zoology 56:2554–2564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Addicott, J. F. 1979. A multispecies aphid-ant association: density dependence and species-specific effects. Canadian Journal of Zoology 57:558–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Addicott, J. F. 1981. Stability properties of 2-species models of mutualism: simulation studies. Oecologia 49:42–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Addicott, J. F., Aho, J. M., Antolin, M. F., Padilla, D. K., Richardson, J. S., and Soluk, D. A.. 1987. Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49:340–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agrawal, A. A., and Fordyce, J. A.. 2000. Induced indirect defence in a lycaenid-ant association: the regulation of a resource in a mutualism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 267:1857–1861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agrawal, A. A., Underwood, N., and Stinchcombe, J. R.. 2004. Intraspecific variation in the strength of density dependence in aphid populations. Ecological Entomology 29:521–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albrecht, M., and Gotelli, N. J.. 2001. Spatial and temporal niche partitioning in grassland ants. Oecologia 126:134–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allee, W. C. 1938. The Social Life of Animals. Boston: Beacon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allee, W. C. 1949. Principles of Animal Ecology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar

Amarasekare, P. 1998a. Allee effects in metapopulation dynamics. American Naturalist 152:298–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amarasekare, P. 1998b. Interactions between local dynamics and dispersal: insights from single species models. Theoretical Population Biology 53:44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amarasekare, P. 2004. Spatial dynamics of mutualistic interactions. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:128–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, M. 1991. An ant-aphid interaction: Formica fusca and Aphthargelia symphoricarpi on Mount St. Helens. American Midland Naturalist 125:29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antolin, M. F., and Addicott, J. F.. 1991. Colonization, among shoot movement, and local population neighborhoods of two aphid species. Oikos 61:45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aoki, S. 1978. Two pemphigids with first instar larvae attacking predatory intruders (Homoptera, Aphidoidea). New Entomologist 27:7–12.Google Scholar

Ashford, D. A., Smith, W. A., and Douglas, A. E.. 2000. Living on a high sugar diet: the fate of sucrose ingested by a phloem-feeding insect, the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Journal of Insect Physiology 46:335–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Atsatt, P. R. 1981. Lycaenid butterflies and ants: selection for enemy free space. American Naturalist 118:638–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aviles, L. 1999. Cooperation and non-linear dynamics: an ecological perspective on the evolution of sociality. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1:459–477.Google Scholar

Awmack, C. S., and Leather, S. R.. 2002. Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 47:817–844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Axelrod, R., and Hamilton, W. D.. 1981. The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390–1396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Axen, A. H. 2000. Variation in behavior of lycaenid larvae when attended by different ant species. Evolutionary Ecology 14:611–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Axen, A. H., and Pierce, N. E.. 1998. Aggregation as a cost-reducing strategy for lycaenid larvae. Behavioral Ecology 9:109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Axen, A. H., Leimar, O., and Hoffman, V.. 1996. Signalling in a mutualistic interaction. Animal Behaviour 52:321–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Azcarate, F. M., Arqueros, L., Sanchez, A. M., and Peco, B.. 2005. Seed and fruit selection by harvester ants, Messor barbarus, in Mediterranean grassland and scrubland. Functional Ecology 19:273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bach, C. E. 1991. Direct and indirect interactions between ants (Pheidole megacephala), scales (Coccus viridis) and plants (Pluches indica). Oecologia 87:233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, B. R. 1961. The influence of ants upon parasites, predators, and scale insects. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 54:543–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baylis, M., and Pierce, N. E.. 1991. The effect of host plant quality on the survival of larvae and oviposition by adults of an ant-tended lycaenid butterfly, Jalmenus evagoras. Ecological Entomology 16:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beattie, A. J. 1976. Plant dispersion, pollination and gene flow in Viola. Oecologica 25:291–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beattie, A. J. 1985. The Evolutionary Ecology of Ant-Plant Mutualisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becerra, J. X. I., and Venable, D. L.. 1989. Extrafloral nectaries: a defense against ant-homoptera mutualisms?Oikos 55:276–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becerra, J. X., and Venable, D. L.. 1991. The role of ant-Homoptera mutualisms in the evolution of extrafloral nectaries. Oikos 60:105–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckerman, A., Benton, T. G., Ranta, E., Kaitala, V., and Lundberg, P.. 2002. Population dynamic consequences of delayed life-history effects. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, G. 2001. Neutral macroecology. Science 293:2413–2418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bentley, B. L. 1976. Plants bearing extrafloral nectaries and the associated ant community: interhabitat differences in the reduction of herbivore damage. Ecology 57:815–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bentley, B. L. 1977. Extrafloral nectaries and protection by pugnacious bodyguards. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 8:407–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergeson, E., and Messina, F. J.. 1997. Resource- versus enemy-mediated interactions between cereal aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) on a common host plant. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 90:425–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergeson, E., and Messina, F. J.. 1998. Effect of a co-occurring aphid on the susceptibility of the Russian wheat aphid to lacewing predators. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 87:103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berryman, A. A., Lima, M., and Hawkins, B. A.. 2002. Population regulation, emergent properties, and a requiem for density dependence. Oikos 100:600–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhatkar, A. P., and Kloft, W. J.. 1977. Evidence, using radioactive phosphorus, of interspecific food exchange in ants. Nature 265: 140–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Billick, I., and Tonkel, K.. 2003. The relative importance of spatial vs. temporal variability in generating a conditional mutualism. Ecology 84:289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Billick, I., Weidmann, M., and Reithel, J.. 2001. The relationship between ant-tending and maternal care in the treehopper Publilia modesta. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51:41–46.Google Scholar

Bishop, D. B., and Bristow, C. M.. 2001. Effect of Allegheny mound ant (Hymenoptera : Formicidae) presence on homopteran and predator populations in Michigan jack pine forests. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 94:33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackman, R. L. and Eastop, V. F.. 1994. Aphids on the World's Trees. Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar

Blossey, B., and Hunt-Joshi, T. R.. 2003. Belowground herbivory by insects: influence on plants and aboveground herbivores. Annual Review of Entomology 48:521–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blüthgen, N., and Fiedler, K.. 2004a. Competition for composition: lessons from nectar-feeding ant communities. Ecology 85:1479–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blüthgen, N., and Fiedler, K.. 2004b. Preferences for sugars and amino acids and their conditionality in a diverse nectar-feeding ant community. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blüthgen, N., Gebauer, G., and Fiedler, K.. 2003. Disentangling a rainforest food web using stable isotopes: dietary diversity in a species-rich ant community. Oecologia 137:426–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blüthgen, N., Verhaagh, M., Goitia, W., Jaffe, K., Morawetz, W., and Barthlott, W.. 2000. How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia 125:229–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bolton, B. 1995. A New General Catalogue of the Ants of the World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G., and Deneubourg, J. L.. 1999. Dominance orders in animal societies: the self-organization hypothesis revisited. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 61:727–757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G., Deneubourg, J. L., Aron, S., and Camazine, S.. 1997. Self-organization in social insects. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:188–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bonkowski, M., Geoghegan, I. E., Birch, A. N. E., and Griffiths, B. S.. 2001. Effects of soil decomposer invertebrates (protozoa and earthworms) on an above-ground phytophagous insect (cereal aphid) mediated through changes in the host plant. Oikos 95:441–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonsall, M. B., and Hassell, M. P.. 1997. Apparent competition structures ecological assemblages. Nature 388:371–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonsall, M. B., Jansen, V. A. A., and Hassell, M. P.. 2004. Life history trade-offs assemble ecological guilds. Science 306:111–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boucher, D. H. 1985. The Biology of Mutualism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boursaux-Eude, C., and Gross, R.. 2000. New insights into symbiotic associations between ants and bacteria. Research in Microbiology 151:513–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bradley, G. A., and Hinks, J. D.. 1968. Ants aphids and jack pine in Manitoba. Canadian Entomologist 100:40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braschler, B., and Baur, B.. 2003. Effects of experimental small-scale grassland fragmentation on spatial distribution, density, and persistence of ant nests. Ecological Entomology 28:651–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braschler, B., and Baur, B.. 2005. Experimental small-scale grassland fragmentation alters competitive interactions among ant species. Oecologia 143:291–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Braschler, B., Lampel, G., and Baur, B.. 2003. Experimental small-scale grassland fragmentation alters aphid population dynamics. Oikos 100:581–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braschler, B., Zschokke, S., Dolt, C., Thommen, G. H., Oggier, P., and Baur, B.. 2004. Grain-dependent relationships between plant productivity and invertebrate species richness and biomass in calcareous grasslands. Basic and Applied Ecology 5:15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brauchli, K., Killingback, T., and Doebeli, M.. 1999. Evolution of cooperation in spatially structured populations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 200:405–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Breton, L. M., and Addicott, J. F.. 1992a. Density-dependent mutualism in an aphid-ant interaction. Ecology 73:2175–2180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breton, L. M., and Addicott, J. F.. 1992b. Does host plant quality mediate aphid-ant mutualism?Oikos 63:253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bristow, C. M. 1984. Differential benefits from ant-attendance to two species of Homoptera on New York ironweed. Journal of Animal Ecology 53:715–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bristow, C. M. 1991. Why are so few aphids ant-tended? In Ant-plant Interactions, ed. Huxley, C. R. and Cutler, D. F., pp. 104–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brodbeck, B. V., and D. Strong. 1987. Amino acid nutrition of herbivorous insects and stress to host plants. In Insect Outbreaks: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives, ed. Barbosa, P. and Schultz, J., pp. 347–364. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bronstein, J. L. 1988. Mutualism, antagonism, and the fig-pollinator interaction. Ecology 69:1298–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronstein, J. L. 1994a. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:214–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronstein, J. L. 1994b. Our current understanding of mutualism. Quarterly Review of Biology 69:31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronstein, J. L. 2001. The exploitation of mutualism. Ecology Letters 4:277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, J. L. 1983. Cooperation: a biologist's dilemma. Advances in the Study of Behaviour 13:1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, M. J. F., and Gordon, D. M.. 2000. How resources and encounters affect the distribution of foraging activity in a seed-harvesting ant. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 47:195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buckley, R. 1987. Ant-plant-homopteran interactions. Advances in Ecological Research 16:53–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buckley, R., and Gullan, P.. 1991. More aggressive ant species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) provide better protection for soft scales and mealybugs (Homoptera, Coccidae, Pseudococcidae). Biotropica 23:282–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cappuccino, N. 1987. Comparative population dynamics of two goldenrod aphids: spatial patterns and temporal constancy. Ecology 68:1634–1646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cappuccino, N. 1988. Spatial patterns of goldenrod aphids and the response of enemies to patch density. Oecologia 76:607–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carroll, C. R., and Janzen, D. H.. 1973. Ecology of foraging by ants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4:231–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choe, D.-H. and Rust, M. K.. 2006. Ants learn the association between homopteran cuticular chemistry and honeydew. Chemoecology 16: 175–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cocroft, R. B. 1996. Insect vibrational defence signals. Nature 382:679–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cocroft, R. B. 1999. Parent-offspring communication in response to predators in a subsocial treehopper (Hemiptera : Membracidae : Umbonia crassicornis). Ethology 105:553–568.Google Scholar

Cocroft, R. B. 2002. Antipredator defense as a limited resource: unequal predation risk in broods of an insect with maternal care. Behavioral Ecology 13:125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cocroft, R. B., and Rodriguez, R. L.. 2005. The behavioral ecology of insect vibrational communication. BioScience 55:323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, C. M., and Leather, S. R.. 2002. Ant-mediated dispersal of the black willow aphid Pterocomma salicis L.; does the ant Lasius niger L. judge aphid-host quality?Ecological Entomology 27:238–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connor, R. C. 1986. Pseudo reciprocity: investing in mutualism. Animal Behaviour 34:1562–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connor, R. C. 1995. The benefits of mutualism: a conceptual framework. Biological Review 70:427–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costa, J. T., McDonald, J. H., and Pierce, N. E.. 1996. The effect of ant association on the population genetics of the Australian butterfly, Jalmenus evagoras (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 58:287–306.Google Scholar

Cushman, J. H. 1991. Host-plant mediation of insect mutualisms: variable outcomes in herbivore-ant interactions. Oikos 61:138–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cushman, J. H., and Addicott, J. F.. 1989. Intra- and interspecific competition for mutualists: ants as a limited and limiting resource for aphids. Oecologia 79:315–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cushman, J. H., and Whitham, T. G.. 1989. Conditional mutualism in a membracid-ant association: temporal, age specific, and density dependent effects. Ecology, 70:1040–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cushman, J. H., and Whitham, T. G.. 1991. Competition mediating the outcome of a mutualism – protective services of ants as a limiting resource for membracids. American Naturalist 138: 851–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cushman, J. H., Lawton, J. H., and Manly, B. F. J.. 1993. Latitudinal patterns in European ant assemblages variation is species richness and body size. Oecologia 95:30–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cushman, J. H., Rashbrook, V. K., and Beattie, A. J.. 1994. Assessing benefits to both participants in a lycaenid-ant association. Ecology 75:1031–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin, C. 1890. The Origin of Species, 6th edition. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. W. 1997. The role of resource imbalances in the evolutionary ecology of tropical arboreal ants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 61:153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, D. W. 1998. Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants: a functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off. Ecological Entomology 23:484–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, D. W. 2005. Ecological stoichiometry of ants in a New World rain forest. Oecologia 142:221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, D. W., Cook, S. C., and Snelling, R. R.. 2004. Liquid-feeding performances of ants (Formicidae): ecological and evolutionary implications. Oecologia 139:255–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davidson, D. W., Cook, S. C., Snelling, R. R., and Chua, T. H.. 2003. Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies. Science 300:969–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dean, A. M. 1983. A simple model of mutualism. American Naturalist 121:409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeAngelis, D. L., and Waterhouse, J. C.. 1987. Equilibrium and nonequilibrium concepts in ecological models. Ecological Monographs 57: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delabie, J. H. C. 2001. Trophobiosis between Formicidae and Hemiptera (Sternorrhyncha and Auchenorrhyncha): an overview. Neotropical Entomology 30:501–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Del-Claro, K., and Oliveira, P. S.. 1993. Ant-homoptera interaction: do alternative sugar sources distract tending ants?Oikos 68: 202–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Del-Claro, K., and Oliveira, P. S.. 2000. Conditional outcomes in a neotropical treehopper-ant association: temporal and species-specific variation in ant protection and homopteran fecundity. Oecologia 124:156–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denno, R. F. 1994. The evolution of dispersal polymorphism in insects: the influence of habitats, host plants and mates. Research in Population Ecology Kyoto 36:127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denno, R. F., Gratton, C., Dobel, H., and Finke, D. L.. 2003. Predation risk affects relative strength of top-down and bottom-up impacts on insect herbivores. Ecology 84:1032–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denno, R. F., Gratton, C., Peterson, M. A., Langellotto, G. A., Finke, D. L., and Huberty, A. F.. 2002. Bottom-up forces mediate natural-enemy impact in a phytophagous insect community. Ecology 83:1443–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denno, R. F., Olmstead, K. L., and McCloud, E. S.. 1989. Reproductive cost of flight capability: a comparison of life-history traits in wing dimorphic planthoppers. Ecological Entomology 14:31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denno, R. F., Peterson, M. A., Gratton, C., Cheng, J. A., Langellotto, G. A., Huberty, A. F., and Finke, D. L.. 2000. Feeding-induced changes in plant quality mediate interspecific competition between sap-feeding herbivores. Ecology 81:1814–1827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denno, R. F., Roderick, G. K., Olmstead, K. L., and Dobel, H. G.. 1991. Density-related migration in planthoppers (Homoptera, Delphacidae): the role of habitat persistence. American Naturalist 138:1513–1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeVries, P. J. 1991a. Evolutionary and ecological patterns in myrmecophilous riodinid butterflies. In Ant-plant Interactions, ed. Huxley, C. R. and Cutler, D. F., pp. 143–156. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

DeVries, P. J. 1991b. Mutualism between Thisbe irenea butterflies and ants, and the role of ant ecology in the evolution of larval ant associations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 43:179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeVries, P. J. 1997. The Butterflies of Costa Rica and their Natural History. vol. II, The Riodinidae. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Diamond, J. M. 1978. Niche shifts and the rediscovery of interspecific competition. American Scientist 66:322–331Google Scholar

Dietrich, C. H., and Deitz, L. L.. 1993. Superfamily Membracoidea (Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha). 2. Cladistic-Analysis and Conclusions. Systematic Entomology 18:297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, A. F. G. 1958. The escape response shown by certain aphids to the presence of the coccinellid Adalia decempunctata (L.). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 110:319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, A. F. G. 1975. Effect of population density and food quality on autumnal reproductive activity in the sycamore aphid, Drepanosiphum platanoides (Schr.). Journal of Animal Ecology 44:297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, A. F. G. 1984. Plant architectural complexity and alary polymorphism in tree-dwelling aphids. Ecological Entomology 9:117–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, A. F. G. 1998. Aphid Ecology, 2nd edition. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar

Dixon, A. F. G. 2000. Insect Predator-Prey Dynamics: Ladybird Beetles and Biological Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, A. F. G. 2005. Insect Herbivore-Host Dynamics: Tree-Dwelling Aphids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, A. F. G., and Agarwala, B. K.. 1999. Ladybird-induced life-history changes in aphids. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 266:1549–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, A. F. G., and P. Kindlmann. 1998. Generation time ratio and the effectiveness of ladybirds as classical biological control agents. In Pest Management – Future Challenges, ed. Zalucki, M. P., Drew, R. A. I., and White, G. G. pp. 314–320. Proceedings of the 6th Australasian Applied Entomology and Research Conference. Brisbane: University of Queensland.

Dixon, A. F. G., and McKay, S.. 1970. Aggregation in the sycamore aphid Drepanosiphum platanoides (Schr.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and its relevance to the regulation of population growth. Journal of Animal Ecology 39:439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, A. F. G., Burns, M. D., and Wangboonkong, S.. 1968. Migration in aphids: response to current adversity. Nature 220:1337–1338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dixon, A. F. G., Horth, S., and Kindlmann, P.. 1993. Migration in insects: cost and strategies. Journal of Animal Ecology 62:182–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, A. F. G., Kindlmann, P., Leps, J., and Holman, J.. 1987. Why there are so few species of aphids, especially in the tropics? American Naturalist 129:580–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doebeli, M., and Knowlton, N.. 1998. The evolution of interspecific mutualism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 95:8676–8680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donovan, T., and Welden, C. W.. 2001. Spreadsheet Exercises in Ecology and Evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E. 1989. Mycetocyte symbiosis in insects. Biological Review 64:409–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Douglas, A. E. 1998. Nutritional interactions in insect-microbial symbioses: aphids and their symbiotic bacteria Buchnera. Annual Review of Entomology 43:17–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Douglas, A. E. 2003. The nutritional physiology of aphids. Advances in Insect Physiology 31:73–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, A. E., and Prosser, W. A.. 1992. Synthesis of the essential amino acid tryptophan in the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum) symbiosis. Journal of Insect Physiology 38:565–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, A. E., Minto, L. B., and Wilkinson, T. L.. 2001. Quantifying nutrient production by the microbial symbionts in an aphid. Journal of Experimental Biology 204:349–358.Google Scholar

Dugatkin, L. A. 2002. Cooperation in animals: an evolutionary overview. Biology and Philosophy 17:459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dugatkin, L. A. and Mesterton-Gibbons, M.. 1996. Cooperation among unrelated individuals: reciprocal altruism, by-product mutualism and group selection in fishes. BioSystems 37:19–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dugatkin, L. A., and Reeve, H. K.. 1994. Behavioral ecology and level of selection: dissolving the group selection controversy. Advances in the Study of Behaviour 23:101–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eastop, V. F. 1973. Deductions from the present day host plants of aphids and related insects. In Insect-plant Relationships, ed. Emden, H. F., pp. 157–178. 6th Symposium, Royal Entomological Society of London. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Eastwood, R., and Fraser, A. M.. 1999. Associations between lycaenid butterflies and ants in Australia. Australian Ecology 24:503–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edson, J. 1985. The influence of predation and resource subdivision on the coexistence of goldenrod aphids. Ecology 66:1736–1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisner, T. 1957. A comparative morphological study of the proventriculus of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 116: 429–490.Google Scholar

Eliot, J. N. 1973. The higher classification of the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera): a tentative arrangement. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History 28:371–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elmes, G. W., Thomas, J. A., Munguira, M. L., and Fiedler, K.. 2001. Larvae of lycaenid butterflies that parasitize ant colonies provide exceptions to normal insect growth rules. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 73:259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

El-Ziady, S., and Kennedy, J. S.. 1956. Beneficial effects of the common garden ant, Lasius niger L. on the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae Scopoli. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London A. 31:61–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engel, V., Fischer, M. K., Wäckers, F. L., and Völkl, W.. 2001. Interactions between extrafloral nectaries, aphids and ants: are there competition effects between plant and homopteran sugar sources?Oecologia 129: 577–584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ewald, P. W. 1994. Evolution of Infectious Disease. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ewart, W. H., and Metcalf, R. L.. 1956. Preliminary studies of sugar and amino acids in the honeydew of five species of coccids feeding on citrus in California. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 49:441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feener, D. H. Jr. 1981. Competition between ant species: outcome controlled by parasitic flies. Science 214:815–817.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feinsinger, P., Spears, E. E., and Poole, R. W.. 1981. A simple measure of niche breadth. Ecology 62:27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fellers, J. H. 1987. Interference and exploitation in a guild of woodland ants. Ecology 68:1466–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferriere, R., Bronstein, J. L., Rinaldi, S., Law, R., and Gauduchon, M.. 2002. Cheating and the evolutionary stability of mutualisms. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London 269:773–780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fiedler, K. 1991. Systematic, evolutionary, and ecological implications of myrmecophily within Lycaenidae (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Bonner Zoological Monograph 31:5–157.Google Scholar

Fiedler, K. 1994. Lycaenid butterflies and plants: is myrmecophily associated with amplified host plant diversity?Ecological Entomology 19: 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiedler, K. 1995. Lycaenid butterflies and plants: is myrmecophily associated with particular host plant preferences?Ethology Ecology and Evolution 7: 107–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiedler, K. 1996. Host-plant relationships of lycaenid butterflies: large-scale patterns, interactions with plant chemistry, and mutualism with ants. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 80:259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiedler, K. 1997a. Geographical patterns in life-history traits of Lycaenidae butterflies – ecological and evolutionary implications. Zoology 100:336–347.Google Scholar

Fiedler, K. 1997b. Life-history patterns of myrmecophilous butterflies and other insects: their implications on tropical species diversity. In Tropical Biodiversity and Systematics, ed. Ulrich, H., pp. 71–92. Bonn: Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig.Google Scholar

Fiedler, K. 2001. Ants that associate with Lycaenidae butterfly larvae: diversity, ecology and biogeography. Diversity and Distributions 7:45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiedler, K., Holldobler, B., and Seufert, P.. 1996. Butterflies and ants: the communicative domain. Experientia 52:14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, M. K., and Shingleton, A. W.. 2001. Host plant and ants influence the honeydew sugar composition of aphids. Functional Ecology 15:544–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, M. K., Hoffmann, K. H., and Völkl, W.. 2001. Competition for mutualists in an ant-homopteran interaction mediated by hierarchies of ant-attendance. Oikos 92:531–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, R. C., Olzant, S. M., Wanek, W., and Mayer, V.. 2005. The fate of Corydalis cava elaiosomes within an ant colony of Myrmica rubra: elaiosomes are preferentially fed to larvae. Insectes Sociaux 52:55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, D. B., Wright, J. P., and Mittler, T. E.. 1984. Osmoregulation by the aphid Myzus persicae: a physiological role for honeydew oligosaccharides. Journal of Insect Physiology 30:387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flanders, S. E. 1957. The complete interdependence of an ant and a coccid. Ecology 38:535–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flatt, T., and Weisser, W. W.. 2000. The effects of mutualistic ants on aphid life history traits. Ecology 81:3522–3529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowler, H. G. 1993. Differential recruitment in Camponotus rufipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) to protein and carbohydrate resources. Naturalia 18:9–13.Google Scholar

Fraser, A. M., Axen, A. H., and Pierce, N. E.. 2001. Assessing the quality of different ant species as partners of a myrmecophilous butterfly. Oecologia 129:452–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fraser, A. M., Tregenza, T., Wedell, N., Elgar, M. A., and Pierce, N. E.. 2002. Oviposition tests of ant preference in a myrmecophilous butterfly. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15:861–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freitas, A. V. L., and Oliveira, P. S.. 1992. Biology and behaviour of the neotropical butterfly Eunica bechina (Nymphalidae) with special reference to larval defence against ant predation. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 31:1–11.Google Scholar

Freitas, A. V. L., and Oliveira, P. S.. 1996. Ants as selective agents on herbivore biology: effects on the behaviour of a non-myrmecophilous butterfly. Journal of Animal Ecology 65:205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaume, L., Matile-Ferrero, D., and McKey, D.. 2000. Colony formation and acquisition of coccoid trophobionts by Aphomomyrmex afer (Formicinae): co-dispersal of queens and phoretic mealybugs in an ant-plant-homopteran mutualism?Insectes Sociaux 47: 84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaume, L., McKey, D., and Terrin, S.. 1998. Ant-plant-homopteran mutualism: how the third partner affects the interaction between a plant-specialist ant and its myrmecophyte host. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 265:569–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gish, M., and Inbar, M.. 2006. Host location by apterous aphids after escape dropping from the plant. Journal of Insect Behavior 19: 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goidanich, A. 1956. Stomaphis quercus and ants. Bulletin of the Institite of Entomology of the University of Bologna 23:93–131.Google Scholar

Gonzales, W. L., Fuentes-Contreras, E., and Niemeyer, H. M.. 2002. Host plant and natural enemy impact on cereal aphid competition in a seasonal environment. Oikos 96:481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodchild, A. J. P. 1966. Evolution of the alimentary canal in the Hemiptera. Biological Reviews 41:97–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gösswald, K. 1938. Über den Einfluß von verschiedenen Temperaturen und Luftfeuchtigkeit auf die Lebensäusserungen der Ameisen. 1. Die Lebensdauer ökologisch verschiedener Ameisenarten unter dem Einfluß bestimmter Luftfeuchtigkeit und Temperatur. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie (A):247–344.Google Scholar

Gösswald, K. 1941. Rassenstudien an der roten Waldameise Formica rufa L. auf systematischer, ökologischer, physiologischer und biologischer Grundlage. Zeitschrift für angewandte Entomologie 28:62–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gösswald, K. 1989a. Die Waldameise im Ökosystem Wald, Nutzen und Hege. Wiesbaden: Aula Verlag.Google Scholar

Gösswald, K. 1989b. Die Waldameise: Biologische Grundlagen, Ökologie und Verhalten. Wiesbaden: Aula Verlag.Google Scholar

Gotelli, N. J. 1996. Ant community structure: effects of predatory ant lions. Ecology 77:630–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gotelli, N. J., and Arnett, A. E.. 2000. Biogeographic effects of red fire ant invasion. Ecology Letters 3:257–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gotelli, N. J., and Ellison, A. M.. 2002. Assembly rules for New England ant assemblages. Oikos 99:591–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. 1988 Kropotkin was no crackpot. Natural History 7: 12–21.Google Scholar

Graham, M. H., and Dayton, P. K.. 2002. On the evolution of ecological ideas: paradigms and scientific progress. Ecology 83:1481–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grassé, P.-P. 1951. Traité de Zoologie: Anatomie, Systematique, Biologie. Tome X, Fascicule II, Insectes Supérieurs et Hémiptéroïdes. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar

Greathead, D. J. 1990. Crawler behaviour and dispersal. In World Crop Pests. Armored Scale Insects: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, ed. Rosen, D., pp. 305–308. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Greene, C. M. 2003. Habitat selection reduces extinction of populations subject to Allee effects. Theoretical Population Biology 64:1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Greene, C. M., and Stamps, J. A.. 2001. Habitat selection at low population densities. Ecology 82:2091–2100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruppe, A., and Römer, P.. 1988. The lupin aphid (Macrosiphum albifrons Essig, 1911) (Hom, Aphididae) in West Germany: its occurrence, host plants and natural enemies. Journal of Applied Entomology 106:135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gullan, P. 1997. Relationships with ants. In Soft Scale Insects: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, ed. Ben-Dov, Y. and Hodgson, C. J., pp. 351–373. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Gullan, P. J., and Kosztarab, M.. 1997. Adaptations in scale insects. Annual Review of Entomology 42:23–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gullan, P., and J. H. Martin. 2003. Sternorrhyncha (jumping plant lice, whiteflies, aphids, and scale insects). In Encyclopedia of Insects, ed. Resh, V. H. and Crade, R. T., pp. 1079–1089. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hairston, G., Smith, F. E., and Slobodkin, L. B.. 1960. Community structure, population control, and competition. American Naturalist 64:421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hajek, A. E., and Dahlsten, D. L.. 1986. Coexistence of three species of leaf-feeding aphids (Homoptera) on Betula pendula. Oecologia 68:380–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hale, B. K., Bale, J. S., Pritchard, J., Masters, G. J., and Brown, V. K.. 2003. Effects of host plant drought stress on the performance of the bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi (L.): a mechanistic analysis. Ecological Entomology 28:666–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, W. D., and May, R. M.. 1977. Dispersal in stable habitats. Nature 269:578–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanks, L. M., and R. F. Denno. 1993. The role of demic adaptation in colonization and spread of scale insect populations. In Evolution of Insect Pests: Patterns of Variation, ed. Kim, K. C. and McPheron, B. A., pp. 393–411. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Hanski, I. 1998. Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hanski, I., and Gilpin, M. E.. 1997. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Harmon, J. P., and Andow, D. A.. 2007. Behavioral mechanism underlying ants' density-dependent deterence of aphid-eating predators. Oikos 116: 1030–1036.Google Scholar

Hanski, I., and Woiwod, I. P.. 1993. Spatial synchrony in the dynamics of moth and aphid populations. Journal of Animal Ecology 62:656–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hay, M. E., Parker, J. D., Burkepile, D. E., Caudill, C. C., Wilson, A. E., Hallinan, Z. P., and Chequer, A. D.. 2004. Mutualism and aquatic community structure: the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35:175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayamizu, E. 1982. Comparative studies on aggregations among aphids in relation to population dynamics. 1. Colony formation and aggregation behavior of Brevicoryne brassicae L. and Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera, Aphididae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 17:519–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinsohn, R., and Packer, C.. 1995. Complex cooperative strategies in group-territorial African lions. Science 269:1260–1262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Heinze, J. 1995. Reproductive skew and genetic relatedness in Leptothorax ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 261:375–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heithaus, E. R., Culver, D. C., and Beattie, A. J.. 1980. Models of some ant-plant mutualisms. American Naturalist 16:347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helms, K. R., and Vinson, S. B.. 2002. Widespread association of the invasive ant Solenopsis invicta with an invasive mealybug. Ecology 83:2425–2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hennig, W. 1969. Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten. Frankfurt a. Main: Senkenberg, Naturforschende Gesellschaft.

Herre, E. A., Knowlton, N., Mueller, U. G., and Rehner, S. A.. 1999. The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:49–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hill, M. G., and Blackmore, P. J. M.. 1980. Interactions between ants and the coccid Icerya seychellarum on Aldabra Atoll. Oecologia 45:360–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hixon, M. A., Pacala, S. W., and Sandin, S. A.. 2002. Population regulation: historical context and contemporary challenges of open vs. closed systems. Ecology 83:1490–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hochberg, M. E., Clarke, R. T., Elmes, G. W., and Thomas, J. A.. 1994. Population dynamic consequences of direct and indirect interactions involving a large blue butterfly and its plant and red ant hosts. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:375–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hochberg, M. E., Gomulkiewicz, R., Holt, R. D., and Thompson, J. N.. 2000. Weak sinks could cradle mutualistic symbioses – strong sources should harbour parasitic symbioses. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13:213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoeksema, J. D., and Bruna, E. M.. 2000. Pursuing the big questions about interspecific mutualism: a review of theoretical approaches. Oecologia 125:321–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hoeksema, J. D., and Schwartz, M. W.. 2002. Expanding comparative-advantage biological market models: contingency of mutualism on partners' resource requirements and acquisition trade-offs. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London Series B. 270:913–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hol, W. H. G., and Van, J. A. Veen. 2002. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids from Senecio jacobaea affect fungal growth. Journal of Chemical Ecology 28:1763–1772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hol, W. H. G., Vrieling, K., and Veen, J. A.. 2003. Nutrients decrease pyrrolizidine alkaloid concentrations in Senecio jacobaea. New Phytologist 158:175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, J. N., DeAngelis, D. L., and Bronstein, J. L.. 2002. Population dynamics and mutualism: functional responses of benefits and costs. American Naturalist 159:231–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holland, J. N., J. H. Ness, A. Boyle, and J. L. Bronstein. 2005. Mutualisms as consumer-resource interactions. In Ecology of Predator-Prey Interactions ed. Barbosa, P. and Castellanos, I.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 17–33.

Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O.. 1990. The Ants. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holt, R. D. 1977. Predation, apparent competition, and structure of prey communities. Theoretical Population Biology 12:197–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holt, R. D. 2002. Food webs in space: on the interplay of dynamic instability and spatial processes. Ecological Research 17:261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holt, R. D., and Lawton, J. H.. 1994. The ecological consequences of shared natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25:495–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holway, D. A., and Suarez, A. V.. 2004. Colony-structure variation and interspecific competitive ability in the invasive Argentine ant. Oecologia 138:216–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holway, D. A., Lach, L., Suarez, A. V., Tsutsui, N. D., and Case, T. J.. 2002a. The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:181–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holway, D. A., Suarez, A. V., and Case, T. J.. 2002b. Role of abiotic factors in governing susceptibility to invasion: a test with argentine ants. Ecology 83:1610–1619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honek, A. 1991. Environment stress, plant quality and abundance of cereal aphids (Hom., Aphididae) on winter wheat. Journal of Applied Entomology 112:65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopkins, G. W., and Dixon, A. F. G.. 1997. Enemy-free space and the feeding niche of an aphid. Ecological Entomology 22:271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopkins, G. W., and Thacker, J. I.. 1999. Ants and habitat specificity in aphids. Journal of Insect Conservation 3:25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopkins, G. W., Thacker, J. I., and Dixon, A. F. G.. 1998. Limits to the abundance of rare species: an experimental test with a tree aphid. Ecological Entomology 23:386–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howe, H. F. 1984. Constraints on the evolution of mutualism. American Naturalist 123:764–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hsiao, T. C. 1973. Plant responses to water stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 24:519–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hubbell, S. P. 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Huberty, A. F., and Denno, R. F.. 2004. Plant water stress and its consequences for herbivorous insects: a new synthesis. Ecology 85:1383–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, M. D. 2002. Maternal effects and the population dynamics of insects on plants. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 4:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, M. D., and Price, P. W.. 1998. Cycles in insect populations: delayed density dependence or exogenous driving variables?Ecological Entomology 23:216–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunter, M. D., and Price, P. W.. 2000. Detecting cycles and delayed density dependence: a reply to Turchin and Berryman. Ecological Entomology 25:122–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huxley, T. H. 1888. The struggle for existence in human society. Nineteenth Century.

Inbar, M., Doostdar, H., and Mayer, R. T.. 2001. Suitability of stressed and vigorous plants to various insect herbivores. Oikos 94:228–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingram, K. K. 2002a. Flexibility in nest density and social structure in invasive populations of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. Oecologia 133:492–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingram, K. K. 2002b. Plasticity in queen number and social structure in the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile). Evolution 56:2008–2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ives, A. R., Kareiva, P., and Perry, R.. 1993. Responses of a predator to variation in prey density at three hierarchical scales: lady beetles feeding on aphids. Ecology 74:1929–1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janzen, D. H. 1977. What are dandelions and aphids?American Naturalist 111: 586–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janzen, D. H. 1985. The natural history of mutualisms. In The Biology of Mutualism: Ecology and Evolution, ed. Boucher, D. H., pp. 40–99. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, B. 1959. Ants and form reversal in aphids. Nature 184:740–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, S. N., Douglas, A. E., Woodward, S., and Hartley, S. E.. 2003a. Microbial impacts on plant-herbivore interactions: the indirect effects of a birch pathogen on a birch aphid. Oecologia 134:388–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, S. N., Elston, D. A., and Hartley, S. E.. 2003b. Influence of host plant heterogeneity on the distribution of a birch aphid. Ecological Entomology 28:533–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnstone, R. A., and Bshary, R.. 2002. From parasitism to mutualism: partner control in asymmetric interactions. Ecology Letters 5:634–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jordano, D., Rodriguez, J., Thomas, C. D., and Haeger, J. F.. 1992. The distribution and density of a lycaenid butterfly in relation to Lasius ants. Oecologia 91:439–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jordano, D., and Thomas, C. D.. 1992. Specificity of an ant-lycaenid interaction. Oecologia 91:431–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kainulainen, P., Holopainen, J., Palomäki, V., and Holopainen, T.. 1996. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on secondary chemistry and ectomycorrhizal state of Scots pine seedlings and on growth of grey pine aphid. Journal of Chemical Ecology 22:617–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kaneko, S. 2002. Aphid-attending ants increase the number of emerging adults of the aphid's primary parasitoid and hyperparasitoids by repelling intraguild predators. Entomological Science 5:131–146.Google Scholar

Kaplan, I., and Eubanks, M. D.. 2002. Disruption of cotton aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) – Natural enemy dynamics by red imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environmental Entomology 31:1175–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kareiva, P. 1987. Habitat fragmentation and the stability of predator-prey interactions. Nature 326:388–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karsai, I., and Wenzel, J. W.. 1998. Productivity, individual-level and colony-level flexibility, and organization of work as consequences of colony size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95:8665–8669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kaspari, M., and Vargo, E. L.. 1995. Colony size as a buffer against seasonality – Bergmanns rule in social insects. American Naturalist 145:610–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaspari, M., Alonso, L., and O'Donnell, S.. 2000a. Three energy variables predict ant abundance at a geographical scale. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 267:485–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaspari, M., O'Donnell, S., and Kercher, J. R.. 2000b. Energy, density, and constraints to species richness: ant assemblages along a productivity gradient. American Naturalist 155:280–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katayama, N., and Suzuki, N.. 2002. Cost and benefit of ant-attendance for Aphis craccivora (Hemiptera: Aphididae) with reference to aphid colony size. Canadian Entomologist 134:241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, A. 2004. The relative availabilities of complementary resources affect the feeding preferences of ant colonies. Behavioral Ecology 15:63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keddy, P. 1990. Is mutualism really irrelevant to ecology?Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 71:101–102.Google Scholar

Keeler, K. H. 1979. Distribution of ants with extrafloral nectaries and ants at two elevations in Jamaica. Biotropica 11:152–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keeler, K. H. 1981. A model of selection for facultative nonsymbiotic mutualism. American Naturalist 118:488–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keeler, K. H. 1985. Extrafloral nectaries on plants in communities without ants: Hawaii. Oikos 44:407–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, L., and Chapuisat, M.. 1999. Cooperation among selfish individuals in insect societies. BioScience 49:899–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, L., and Reeve, H. K.. 1994. Partitioning of reproduction in animal societies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:98–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kennedy, J. S. and Booth, C. O. 1959. Responses of Aphis fabae Scop to water shortage in host plants in the field. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, J. S., Lamb, K. P. and Booth, C. O.. 1958. Responses of Aphis fabae Scop. to water shortage in host plants in pots. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 1: 274–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Killingback, T., Doebeli, M., and Knowlton, N.. 1999. Variable investment, the Continuous Prisoner's Dilemma, and the origin of cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 266:1723–1728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kindlmann, P. and Dixon, A. F. G.. 1999. Generation time ratios – determinants of prey abundance in insect predator–prey interactions. Biological Control 16:133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kindlmann, P., Hulle, M., and Stadler, B.. 2007. Timing of dispersal: effects of ants on aphids. Oecologia 152:625–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kingsland, S. 1995. Modeling Nature: Episodes in the History of Population Ecology, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kiss, A. 1981. Melezitose, aphids and ants. Oikos 37:382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitching, R. L. 1981. Egg clustering and the southern hemisphere lycaenids: comments. American Naturalist 118:423–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kloft, W. J. 1959. Versuch einer Analyse der trophobiotischen Beziehungen von Ameisen zu Aphiden. Biologisches Zentralblatt 78:863–870.Google Scholar

Kneitel, J. M., and Chase, J. M.. 2004. Trade-offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence. Ecology Letters 7:69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koptur, S. 1991. Extrafloral nectaries of herbs and trees: modeling the interaction with ants and parasitoids. In Ant-plant Interactions, ed. Huxley, C. R. and Cutler, D. F., pp. 213–230. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Koricheva, J., Larsson, S., and Haukioja, E.. 1998. Insect performance on experimentally stressed woody plants: a meta-analysis. Annual Review of Entomology 43:195–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Koteja, J. 1985. Essay on the prehistory of the scale insects (Homoptera, Coccinea). Annales Zoologici (Wars.) 38:461–504.Google Scholar

Kropotkin, P. A. 1902. Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution. London: William Heinemann. Also, 1998. London: Freedom Press.Google Scholar

Kruess, A., and Tscharntke, T.. 1994. Habitat fragmentation, species loss, and biological control. Science 264:1581–1584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kundu, R., and Dixon, A. F. G.. 1995. Evolution of complex life cycles in aphids. Journal of Animal Ecology 64:245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kunert, G., and Weisser, W. W.. 2003. The interplay between density- and trait mediated effects in predator-prey interactions: a case study in aphid wing polymorphism. Oecologia 135:304–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kunkel, H., W. J. Kloft, and A. Fossel. 1985. Die Honigtau-Erzeuger des Waldes. In Waldtracht und Waldhonig in der Imkerei, ed. Kloft, W. J. and Kunkel, H., pp. 48–265. Munich: Ehrenwirth.Google Scholar

Labandeira, C. C. 1997. Insect mouthparts: ascertaining the paleobiology of insect feeding strategies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:153–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larsson, S. 1989. Stressful times for the plant-insect performance hypothesis. Oikos 56:277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larsson, S., and Bjorkman, C.. 1993. Performance of chewing and phloem-feeding insects on stressed trees. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 8:550–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lees, A. D. 1967. The production of the apterous and alatae forms in the aphid Megoura viciae (Buckton), with special reference to the role of crowding. Journal of Insect Physiology 13:289–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leibold, M. A., Holyoak, M., Mouquet, N.et al. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters 7:601–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leimar, O., and Axen, A. H.. 1993. Strategic behavior in an interspecific mutualism: interactions between lycaenid larvae and ants. Animal Behaviour 46:1177–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levieux, J. 1977. La nutrition des fourmis tropicales – V. Eléments de synthèse. Les modes d'exploitation de la biocoenose. Insectes Sociaux 24:235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levieux, J., and Louis, D.. 1975. La nutrition des fourmis tropicales – II. Comportement alimentaire et régime de Camponotus vividus (Smith) (Hymenoptera Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux 22:391–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levin, S. A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levins, R., and Culver, D.. 1971. Regional coexistence of species and competition between rare species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 68:1246–1248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lin, C. P., Danforth, B. N., and Wood, T. K.. 2004. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution of maternal care in Membracine treehoppers. Systematic Biology 53:400–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Loreau, M. 1995. Consumers as maximizers of matter and energy flow in ecosystems. American Naturalist 145:22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loreau, M., Mouquet, N., and Holt, R. D.. 2003. Meta-ecosystems: a theoretical framework for a spatial ecosystem ecology. Ecology Letters 6:673–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lotka, A. J. 1925. Elements of Physiological Biology. New York: Dover Publication (1956).Google Scholar

Mackauer, M., and Völkl, W.. 1993. Regulation of aphid populations by aphid wasps: does parasitoid foraging behaviour or hyperparasitism limit impact?Oecologia 94:339–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Malicky, H. 1969. Versuch einer Analyse der ökologischen Beziehungen zwischen Lycaeniden (Lepidoptera) und Formiciden (Hymenoptera). Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 112:85–90.Google Scholar

Malicky, H. 1970. New aspects of the association between lycaenid larvae (Lycaenidae) and ants (Formicidae; Hymenoptera). Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 24:190–202.Google Scholar

Maschwitz, U., Dumpert, K., and Tuck, K. R.. 1986. Ants feeding on anal exudate from tortricid larvae: a new type of trophobiosis. Journal of Natural History 20:1041–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maschwitz, U., Fiala, B., and Dolling, W. R.. 1987. New trophobiotic symbioses of ants with South-East-Asian bugs. Journal of Natural History 21:1097–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mattson, J. W. 1980. Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11:119–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mattson, J. W., and R. A. Haack. 1987. The role of drought stress in provoking outbreaks of phytophagous insects. In Insect Outbreaks: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives, ed. Barbosa, P. and Schultz, J., pp. 365–407. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Maurer, B. A. 1999. Untangling Ecological Complexity: The Macroscopic Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

May, R. M. 1972. Will a larger complex system be stable?Nature 238:413–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

May, R. M. 1973. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed

May, R. M. and Seger, J. (1986) Ideas in ecology. American Scientist 74: 256–267.Google Scholar

MacArthur, R. H. 1972. Geographical Ecology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

MacArthur, R. H., and Wilson, O. E.. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

McClure, M. S. 1980. Foliar nitrogen: a basis for host suitability for elongate hemlock scale, Fiorinia externa (Homoptera, Diaspididae). Ecology 61:72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McEvoy, P. B. 1979. Advantages and disadvantages to group living in treehoppers (Homoptera: Membracidae). Miscellaneous Publications of the Entomological Society of America 11:1–13.Google Scholar

McGlynn, T. P. 1999. The worldwide transfer of ants: geographical distribution and ecological invasions. Journal of Biogeography 26: 535–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIver, J. D., and Loomis, C.. 1993. A size-distance relation in Homoptera-tending thatch ants (Formica obscuripes, Formica planipilis). Insectes Sociaux 40:207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKamey, S. H. 1998. Taxonomic catalogue of the Membracoidea (exclusive of leafhoppers): second supplement to Fascicle I: Membracidae of the general catalogue of the Hemiptera. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 60:1–377.Google Scholar

McKamey, S. H., and Deitz, L. L.. 1996. Generic revision of the new world tribe Hoplophorionini (Hemiptera: Membracidae: Membracinae). Systematic Entomology 21:295–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Messina, F. J. 1981. Plant protection as a consequence of an ant-membracid mutualism: interactions on Goldenrod (Solidago sp.). Ecology 62: 1433–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mesterton-Gibbons, M., and Dugatkin, L. A.. 1992. Cooperation among unrelated individuals: evolutionary factors. Quarterly Review of Biology 67:267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miles, P. W., Aspinall, D., and Rosenberg, L.. 1982. Performance of the cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae (L), on water-stressed rape plants, in relation to changes in their chemical composition. Australian Journal of Zoology 30:337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, D. R., and Kosztarab, M.. 1979. Recent advances in the study of scale insects. Annual Review of Entomology 24:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mittler, T. E. 1958. Studies on the feeding and nutrition of Tuberolachnus salignus (Gmelin) (Homoptera, Aphididae). 11. The nitrogen and sugar composition of ingested phloem sap and excreted honeydew. Journal of Experimental Biology. 35: 74–84.Google Scholar

Mole, S., and Zera, A. J.. 1993. Differential allocation of resources underlies the dispersal-reproduction trade-off in the wing-dimorphic cricket, Gryllus rubens. Oecologia 93:121–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mole, S., and Zera, A. J.. 1994. Differential resource consumption obviates a potential flight fecundity trade-off in the sand cricket (Gryllus firmus). Functional Ecology 8:573–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Molyneux, R. J., Campbell, B. C., and Dreyer, D. L.. 1990. Honeydew analysis for detecting phloem transport of plant natural products: implications for host plant resistance to sap sucking insects. Journal of Chemical Ecology 16:1899–1909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mondor, E. B., Roitberg, B. D., and Stadler, B.. 2002. Cornicle length in Macrosiphini aphids: a comparison of ecological traits. Ecological Entomology 27:758–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montllor, C. B. 1991. The influence of plant chemistry on aphid feeding behavior. In Insect Plant Interactions, ed. Bernays, E., pp. 125–173. Boston: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Mooney, K. A. and Tillberg, C. V.. 2005. Temporal and spatial variation to ant omnivory in pine forests. Ecology 86:1225–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morales, M. A. 2000a. Mechanisms and density dependence of benefit in an ant-membracid mutualism. Ecology 81:482–489.Google Scholar

Morales, M. A. 2000b. Survivorship of an ant-tended membracid as a function of ant recruitment. Oikos 90:469–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morales, M. A. 2002. Ant-dependent oviposition in the membracid Publilia concava. Ecological Entomology 27:247–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moran, N. 1992. The evolution of aphid life cycles. Annual Review of Entomology 37:321–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, W. F., Bronstein, J. L., and Wilson, W. G.. 2003. Three-way coexistence in obligate mutualist-exploiter interactions: the potential role of competition. American Naturalist 161:860–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morrison, L. W. 2002. Island biogeography and metapopulation dynamics of Bahamian ants. Journal of Biogeography 29:387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mouquet, N., and Loreau, M.. 2002. Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. American Naturalist 159:420–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mouquet, N., and Loreau, M.. 2003. Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. American Naturalist 162:544–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mousseau, T. A., and Dingle, H.. 1991. Maternal effects in insect life histories. Annual Review of Entomology 36:511–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mousseau, T. A., and Fox, C. W.. 1998. The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:403–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mueller, U. G., Schultz, T. R., Currie, C. R., Adams, R. M. M., and Malloch, D.. 2001. The origin of the attine ant-fungus mutualism. Quarterly Review of Biology 76:169–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Müller, C. B., and Godfray, H. C. J.. 1997. Apparent competition between two aphid species. Journal of Animal Ecology 66:57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Müller, C. B., and Godfray, H. C. J.. 1999. Predators and mutualists influence the exclusion of aphid species from natural communities. Oecologia 119:120–125.Google ScholarPubMed

Muller-Landau, H. C., Levin, S. A., and Keymer, J. E.. 2003. Theoretical perspectives on evolution of long-distance dispersal and the example of specialized pests. Ecology 84:1957–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murdoch, W. W. 1994. Population regulation in theory and practice. Ecology 75:271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murdoch, W. W., Briggs, C. J., and Nisbet, R. M.. 2003. Consumer-Resource Dynamics. Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Murray, B. G. 1999. Can the population regulation controversy be buried and forgotten?Oikos 84:148–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nee, S., and May, R. M.. 1992. Dynamics of metapopulations: habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. Journal of Animal Ecology 61:37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neuhauser, C., and Fargione, J. E.. 2004. A mutualism-parasitism continuum model and its application to plant-mycorrhizae interactions. Ecological Modelling 177:337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nice, C. C., Fordyce, J. A., Shapiro, A. M., and Ffrench-Constant, R.. 2002. Lack of evidence for reproductive isolation among ecologically specialised lycaenid butterflies. Ecological Entomology 27:702–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicholson, A. J. 1933. The balance of animal populations. Journal of Animal Ecology 38:131–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicholson, A. J., and Bailey, V. A.. 1935. The balance of animal populations. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 3:551–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nixon, G. E. J. 1951. The Association of Ants with Aphids and Coccids. London: Commonwealth Institute of Entomology.Google Scholar

Noe, R., and Hammerstein, P.. 1994. Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 35:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noe, R., and Hammerstein, P.. 1995. Biological markets. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:336–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nonacs, P., and Calabi, P.. 1992. Competition and predation risk: their perception alone affects ant colony growth. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London Series B 249:95–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nonacs, P., and Dill, L. M.. 1990. Mortality risk vs. food quality trade-offs in a common currency: ant patch preferences. Ecology 71:1886–1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nonacs, P., and Dill, L. M.. 1991. Mortality risk versus food quality trade-offs in ants: patch use over time. Ecological Entomology 16:73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nowak, M. A., and May, R. M.. 1992. Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature 359:826–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nowak, M. A., Bonhoeffer, S., and May, R. M.. 1994. Spatial games and the maintenance of cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 91:4877–4881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nuismer, S. L., Gomulkiewicz, R., and Morgan, M. T.. 2003. Coevolution in temporally variable environments. American Naturalist 162:195–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O'Dowd, D. J., and Catchpole, E. A.. 1983. Ants and extrafloral nectaries: no evidence for plant protection in Helichrysum spp. – ant interactions. Oecologia 59:191–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Offenberg, J. 2000. Correlated evolution of the association between aphids and ants and the association between aphids and plants with extrafloral nectaries. Oikos 91:146–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Offenberg, J. 2001. Balancing between mutualism and exploitation: the symbiotic interaction between Lasius ants and aphids. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 49:304–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliveira, P. S., and Freitas, A. V. L.. 2004. Ant-plant-herbivore interactions in the neotropical cerrado savanna. Naturwissenschaften 91:557–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Olmstead, K. L., and Wood, T. K.. 1990. The effect of clutch size and ant-attendance on egg guarding by Entylia bactriana (Homoptera: Membracidae). Psyche 97:111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osborn, F., and Jaffe, K.. 1997. Cooperation vs. exploitation: interactions between Lycaenid (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) larvae and ants. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 34:69–82.Google Scholar

Oster, G. F., and Wilson, E. O.. 1978. Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects. Princeton: Princton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed

Parvinen, K., Dieckmann, U., Gyllenberg, M., and Metz, J. A. J.. 2003. Evolution of dispersal in metapopulations with local density dependence and demographic stochasticity. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16:143–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pemberton, R. W. 1998. The occurrence and abundance of plants with extrafloral nectaries, the basis for antiherbivore defensive mutualisms, along a latitudinal gradient in east Asia. Journal of Biogeography 25:661–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersen, M. K., and Sandström, J. P.. 2001. Outcome of indirect competition between two aphid species mediated by responses in their common host plant. Functional Ecology 15:525–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterson, M. A. 1995. Unpredictability in the facultative association between larvae of Euphilotes enoptes (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and ants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Scociety. 55:209–223.Google Scholar

Pierce, N. E. 1985. Lycaenid butterflies and ants: selection for nitrogen-fixing and other protein rich food plants. American Naturalist 125:888–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierce, N. E. 1987. The evolution of biogeography of associations between lycaenid butterflies and ants. In Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, vol. 4, ed. Harvey, P. H. and Partridge, L., pp. 89–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pierce, N. E., and Easteal, S.. 1986. The selective advantage of attendant ants for the larvae of a lycaenid butterfly, Glaucopsyche lygdamus. Journal of Animal Ecology 55:451–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierce, N. E., and Elgar, M. A.. 1985. The influence of ants on host plant selection by Jalmenus evagoras, a myrmecophilous lycaenid butterfly. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 16:209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierce, N. E., and Young, W. R.. 1986. Lycaenid butterflies and ants. Two-species stable equilibria in mutualistic, commensal, and parasitic interactions. American Naturalist 128:216–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierce, N. E., Braby, M. F., Heath, A., Lohman, D. J., Mathew, J., Rand, D. B., and Travassos, M. A.. 2002. The ecology and evolution of ant association in the Lycaenidae (Lepidoptera). Annual Review of Entomology 47:733–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierce, N. E., Kitching, R. L., Buckley, R. C., Taylor, M. F. J., and Benbow, K. F.. 1987. The costs and benefits of cooperation between the Australian lycaenid butterfly, Jalmenus evagoras, and its attendant ants. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 21:237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plantegenest, M., and Kindlmann, P.. 1999. Evolutionarily stable strategies of migration in heterogeneous environments. Evolutionary Ecology 13:229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poethke, H. J., and Hovestadt, T.. 2002. Evolution of density-and patch-size-dependent dispersal rates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 269:637–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Polis, G. A., Anderson, W. B., and Holt, R. D.. 1997. Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: the dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ponsen, M. B. 1991. Structure of the digestive system of aphids. Wageningen Agricultural University Papers 91:1–61.Google Scholar

Pontin, A. J. 1978. The number and distribution of subterranean aphids and their exploitation by the ant Lasius flavus (Fabr.). Ecological Entomology 3:203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porter, S. D., and Savignano, D. A.. 1990. Invasion of polygyne fire ants decimates native ants and disrupts arthropod community. Ecology 71:2095–2106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Portha, S., Deneubourg, J.-L., and Detrain, C.. 2002. Self-organized asymmetries in ant foraging: a functional response to food type and colony needs. Behavioural Ecology 13:776–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Portha, S., Deneubourg, J. L., and Detrain, C.. 2004. How food type and brood influence foraging decisions of Lasius niger scouts. Animal Behaviour 68:115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poveda, K., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Scheu, S., and Tscharntke, T.. 2005. Effects of decomposers and herbivores on plant performance and aboveground plant-insect interactions. Oikos 108:503–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Power, M. E. 1992. Top-down and bottom-up forces in food webs: do plants have primacy?Ecology 73:733–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prado, E., and Tjallingii, W. F.. 1997. Effects of previous plant infestation on sieve element acceptance by two aphids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 82:189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, P. W. 1991. The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62:244–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, P. W. 1997. Insect Ecology, 3rd edition. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Price, P. W. 2002. Resource-driven terrestrial interaction webs. Ecological Research 17:241–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prins, A. H., Vrieling, K., Klinkhamer, P. G. L., and Jong, T. J.. 1990. Flowering behaviour of Senecio jacobaea: effects of nutrient availability and size-dependent vernalization. Oikos 59:248–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Punttila, P. 1996. Succession, forest fragmentation, and the distribution of wood ants. Oikos 75:291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Punttila, P., Haila, Y., Pajunen, T., and Tukia, H.. 1991. Colonization of clear-cut forests by ants in the Southern Finnish Taiga – a quantitative survey. Oikos 61:250–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rai, B., Freedman, H. I., and Addicott, J. F.. 1983. Analysis of three species models of mutualism in predator-prey and competitive systems. Mathematical Biosciences 65:13–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rankin, M. A., and Burchsted, J. C. A.. 1992. The cost of migration in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 37:533–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raven, J. A. 1983. Phytophages of xylem and phloem: a comparison of animal and plant sap-feeders. Advances in Ecological Research 13:136–234.Google Scholar

Remaudière, G., and Remaudière, M.. 1997. Catalogue of the World's Aphididae. Paris: INRA.Google Scholar

Renault, C. K., Buffa, L. M., and Delfino, M. A.. 2005. An aphid-ant interaction: effects on different trophic levels. Ecological Research 20:71–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Retana, J., Cerda, X., Alsina, A., and Bosch, J.. 1988. Field observations of the ant Camponotus sylvaticus (Hym., Formicidae): diet and activity patterns. Acta Oecologica 9:101–109.Google Scholar

Rhodes, J. D., Croghan, P. C., and Dixon, A. F. G.. 1996. Uptake, excretion and respiration of sucrose and amino acids by the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Journal of Experimental Biology 199:1269–1276.Google ScholarPubMed

Rhodes, J. D., Croghan, P. C., and Dixon, A. F. G.. 1997. Dietary sucrose and oligosaccharide synthesis in relation to osmoregulation in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Physiological Entomology 22:373–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ricker, W. E. 1954. Stock and recruitment. Journal of the FisheriesBoard of Canada 11:559–623.Google Scholar

Rissing, S., Pollock, G., Higgins, M., Hagen, R. and Smith, D.. 1989. Foraging specialization without relatedness or dominance among co-founding ant queens. Nature 338: 420–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritchie, M. G., Butlin, R. K., and Hewitt, G. M.. 1987. Causation, fitness effects and morphology of macropterism in Chorthippus parallelus (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Ecological Entomology 12:209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robbins, R. K. 1991. Cost and evolution of a facultative mutualism between ants and lycaenid larvae (Lepidoptera). Oikos 62:363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roche, R. K., and Wheeler, D. A.. 1997. Morphological specialization of the digestive tract of Zacryptocerus rohweri (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Morphology 234:253–262.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roff, D. A. 1984. The cost of being able to fly: a study of wing polymorphism in two species of crickets. Oecologia 63:30–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roff, D. A. 1986. The evolution of wing dimorphism in insects. Evolution 40:1009–1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roff, D. A. 1990. The evolution of flightlessness in insects. Ecological Monographs 60:389–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar