Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T23:46:45.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Primate dental topographic analysis and functional morphology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2009

Peter S. Ungar
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas
Jonathan M. Bunn
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas
Joel D. Irish
Affiliation:
University of Alaska, Fairbanks
Greg C. Nelson
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Researchers often use tooth form/function relationships in living primates to reconstruct the diets of early hominins and other fossil primates. One relatively new approach that has become an important tool for dental anthropologists is dental topographic analysis (see Teaford and Ungar, 2006; Ungar, 2006, 2007; Ungar and Daegling, 2007 for recent reviews). In this chapter, we summarize briefly this approach in the context of earlier studies of primate dental functional morphology, and present some new data to illustrate how dental topographic analysis works.

Here we present our first dental topographic analysis of Old World monkeys. Preliminary results for Cercocebus torquatus atys and Procolobus badius badius suggest that these primates: (1) follow the same patterns of decreasing occlusal slope and relief with wear evinced by apes, New World monkeys, and lemurs examined in previous studies, (2) differ from one another in occlusal slope and relief as expected, given dietary differences reported in the literature, and (3) have, on average, more occlusal slope and relief than do apes with similar diets at given stages of wear.

Historical background

Researchers have considered relationships between diet and tooth form in primates for a very long time. Gregory (1922), for example, suggested that molar shape evolved primarily to improve mechanical efficiency for chewing. Workers in the 1970s (e.g. Crompton and Sita-Lumsden, 1970; Kay and Hiiemae, 1974) built on this idea, viewing teeth as guides for masticatory movements.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthony, M. R. L. and Kay, R. F. (1993). Tooth form and diet in ateline and alouattine primates: reflections on the comparative method. American Journal of Science, 293A, 356–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmüller, R. (1998). Nahrungsökologie der Rauchgrauen Mangabe (Cercocebus torquatus atys): Ein Schlüssel zur sozialen Organisation? Thesis, Nürnberg: University of Erlangen-Nürnberg.
Conover, W. J. and Iman, R. L. (1981). Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. American Statistician, 35, 124–9.Google Scholar
Crompton, A. W. and Sita-Lumsden, A. G. (1970). Functional significance of therian molar pattern. Nature, 227, 197–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. G., Oates, J. F., and Dasilva, G. L. (1999). Patterns of frugivory in three West African colobine monkeys. International Journal of Primatology, 20, 327–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, J. C., Ungar, P. S., Teaford, M. F., and Glander, K. E. (2004). Dental topography and molar wear in Alouatta palliata from Costa Rica. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 125, 152–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, W. K. (1922). The Origin and Evolution of Human Dentition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Kay, R. F. (1977). Evolution of molar occlusion in Cercopithecidae and early catarrhines. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 46, 327–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. F. (1978). Molar structure and diet in extant Cercopithecidae. In Development, Function, and Evolution of Teeth, ed. Butler, P. M. and Joysey, K. A., pp. 309–339. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kay, R. F. and Covert, H. H. (1984). Anatomy and behavior of extinct primates. In Food Acquisition and Processing in Primates, ed. Chivers, D. J., Wood, B. A., and Bilsborough, A.. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 467–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. F. and Hiiemae, K. M. (1974). Jaw movement and tooth use in recent and fossil primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 40, 227–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. F. and Ungar, P. S. (1997). Dental evidence for diet in some Miocene catarrhines with comments on the effects of phylogeny on the interpretation of adaptation. In Function, Phylogeny and Fossils: Miocene Hominoids and Great Ape and Human Origins, ed. Begun, D. R., Ward, C., and Rose, M.. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 131–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, S. J., Arrigo-Nelson, S. J., Pochron, S. T.et al. (2005). Dental senescence in a long-lived primate links infant survival to rainfall. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 16579–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, J. (1997). The Kingdon Field Guide to African Mammals. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kinzey, W. G. (1978). Feeding behavior and molar features in two species of titi monkey. In Recent Advances in Primatology, Volume 1, Behavior, ed. Chivers, D. J. and Herbert, J.. New York: Academic Press, pp. 373–85.Google Scholar
Lucas, P. W. (2004). Dental Functional Morphology: How Teeth Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M'Kirera, F. and Ungar, P. S. (2003). Occlusal relief changes with molar wear in Pan troglodytes troglodytes and Gorilla gorilla gorilla. American Journal of Primatology, 60, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, W. S. and Bshary, R. (2002). Association of terrestrial mangabeys (Cercocebus atys) with arboreal monkeys: experimental evidence for the effects of reduced ground predator pressure on habitat use. International Journal of Primatology, 23, 311–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meldrum, D. J. and Kay, R. F. (1997). Nuciruptor rubricae, a new pitheciin seed predator from the Miocene of Colombia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 102, 407–27.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merceron, G., Taylor, S., Scott, R., Chaimanee, Y., and Jaeger, J. J. (2006). Dietary characterization of the hominoid Khoratpithecus (Miocene of Thailand): evidence from dental topographic and microwear texture analyses. Naturwissenschaften, 93, 329–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napier, P. H. (1985). Catalogue of Primates in the British Museum (Natural History) and Elsewhere in the British Isles, Part 3: Family Cercopitehcidae, Subfamily Colobinae. London: British Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Rosenberger, A. L. and Kinzey, W. G. (1976). Functional patterns of molar occlusion in platyrrhine primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 45, 281–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, E. C. (1979). Dental wear scoring technique. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 51, 213–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligsohn, D. and Szalay, F. S. (1978). Relationship between natural selection and dental morphology: tooth function and diet in Lepilemur and Hapalemur. In Development, Function and Evolution of Teeth, ed. Butler, P. M. and Joysey, K. A.. New York: Academic Press, pp. 289–307.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1994). Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biolgical Research. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Strait, S. G. (1993). Molar morphology and food texture among small bodied insectivorous mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 74, 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teaford, M. F., Lucas, P. W., Ungar, P. S., and Glander, K. E. (2006). Mechanical defenses in leaves eaten by Costa Rican howling monkeys (Alouatta palliata). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 129, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teaford, M. F. and Ungar, P. S. (2006). Dental adaptations of African apes. To be published in Handbook of Paleoanthropology. Volume1: Principles, Methods, and Approaches, ed. Kenke, W., Rothe, W., and Tattersall, I.. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, in press.Google Scholar
Ungar, P. S. (1998). Dental allometry, morphology, and wear as evidence for diet in fossil primates. Evolutionary Anthropology, 6, 205–17.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungar, P. S. (2004). Dental topography and diets of Australopithecus afarensis and early Homo. Journal of Human Evolution, 46, 605–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungar, P. S. (2005). Dental evidence for the diets of fossil primates from Rudabánya, northeastern Hungary with comments on extant primate analogs and “noncompetitive” sympatry. Palaeontographica Italica, 90, 97–111.Google Scholar
Ungar, P. S. (2006). Dental functional morphology: the known, the unknown and the unknowable. In Evolution of the Human Diet: The Known, the Unknown and the Unknowable, ed. Ungar, P. S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 39--55.Google Scholar
Ungar, P. S. (2007). Dental topography and human evolution: with comments on the diets of Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus. To be published in Dental Perspectives on Human Evolution: State of the Art Research in Dental Anthropology, ed. Bailey, S., and Hublin, J. J., New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungar, P. S. and Daegling, D. (2007). The functional morphology of jaws and teeth, and their implications for understanding early hominin dietary adaptations. To be published in Early hominin paleoecology, ed. Sponheimer, M., Ungar, P., Reed, K., and Lee-Thorp, J.. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
Ungar, P. S. and M'Kirera, F. (2003). A solution to the worn tooth conundrum in primate functional anatomy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 3874–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungar, P. S. and Williamson, M. (2000). Exploring the effects of tooth wear on functional morphology: a preliminary study using dental topographic analysis. Paleontologica Electronica, 3, 18.Google Scholar
Ungar, P. S., Dennis, J., Kirera, F., Wilson, J., and Grine, F. (2002). Quantification of tooth crown shape by dental topographic analysis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Supplement 34, 158–9.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×