Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T16:51:09.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Developmental variation in the facial skeleton of anatomically modern Homo sapiens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2009

U. Strand Viđarsdóttir
Affiliation:
University of Durham
P. O'Higgins
Affiliation:
University of York
J. L. Thompson
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
G. E. Krovitz
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
A. J. Nelson
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access

Summary

Introduction

An in-depth understanding of how our facial skeletal morphology arises during ontogeny is likely to lead to better understanding of the evolutionary, functional, and environmental influences that underpin variation. Thus, without an understanding of comparative postnatal growth we cannot hope to explain fully variation in the adult facial skeletons of modern and fossil hominins. Further, such understanding opens up new possibilities for practical applications such as the forensic classification by geographic subgroup of the faces of infants and juveniles as well as those of adults. In this chapter we will briefly review what is known of geographic variation and postnatal ontogeny in human crania before describing some of the results of our ongoing studies into interpopulation (geographic) differences and their ontogenetic basis. In so doing, we explore the possibility of classifying subadult material in the same way as is presently routinely carried out for adults.

Our recent studies have highlighted a great deal of variation within modern human ontogeny, as well as an early onset of morphologically distinct, population specific morphologies in modern humans (O'Higgins & Strand Viðarsdóttir, 1999; Strand Viðarsdóttir et al., 2002). These differences in ontogeny between modern human groups can sometimes be of equivalent scale to those documented between species of non-human primates (e.g., O'Higgins et al., 2001). This ontogenetic variability needs to be kept in mind when comparing the development of fossil hominin species to that of a single human population, or indeed a conglomerate sample of mixed populations, since such comparisons could lead to overgeneralized or, at worst, erroneous conclusions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bass, W. (1986). Human Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Manual. Columbia: Missouri Archaeological Society
Batzer, M. A., Stoneking, M., Alegriahartman, M., Bazan, H., Kass, D. H., Shaikh, T. H., Novick, G. E., Ioannou, P. A., Scheer, W. D., Herrera, R. J., & Deininger, P. L. (1994). African origin of human-specific polymorphic Alu insertions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 91, 12288–12292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bookstein, F. L. (1989). Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11, 567–585Google Scholar
Bromage, T. (1986). A comparative scanning electron study of facial growth remodeling in early hominids. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto
Brooks, S., & Suchey, J. (1990). Skeletal age determination based on the os pubis: A comparison of the Acsadi–Nemeskeri and Suchey–Brooks methods. Human Evolution, 5, 227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brues, A. (1990). People and Races. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press
Burrows, A. M., Richtsmeier, J. T., Mooney, M. P., Smith, T. D., Losken, H. W., & Siegel, M. I. (1999). Three-dimensional analysis of craniofacial form in a familial rabbit model of nonsyndromic coronal suture synostosis using Euclidean distance matrix analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 36, 196–2062.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canalis, E. (1993). Regulation of bone remodelling. In Primer on Metabolic Bone Diseases and Disorders of Mineral Metabolisms, ed. M. Favus, pp. 33–37. New York: Raven Press
Cann, R. L., Stoneking, M. & Wilson, A. C. (1987). Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Nature, 325, 31–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavalli-Sforza, L., Menozzi, P., & Piazza, A. (1994). The History and Geography of Human Genes. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Cheverud, J. M., & Richtsmeier, J. T. (1986). Finite-element scaling applied to sexual dimorphism in rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) facial growth. Systematic Zoology, 35, 381–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, S., & O'Higgins, P. (2002). The ontogeny of form variation in the African ape facial skeleton: A hierarchical approach to the interspecific comparison of ontogenetic trajectories. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 34 (Suppl.), 55Google Scholar
Collard, M., & O'Higgins, P. (2001). Ontogeny and homoplasy in the papionin monkey face. Evolution and Development, 3, 322–331CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corner, B. D. & Richtsmeier, J. T. (1991). Morphometric analysis of craniofacial growth in Cebus apella. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 84, 323–342CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corner, B. D. & Richtsmeier, J. T. (1992). Cranial growth in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus): A quantitative analysis using three-dimensional coordinate data. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 87, 67–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corner, B. D. & Richtsmeier, J. T. (1993). Cranial growth and growth dimorphism in Ateles geoffroyi. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 92, 371–394CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Djorovic, A. & Kalezic, M. L. (2000). Paedogenesis in European newts (Triturus: Salamandridae): Cranial morphology during ontogeny. Journal of Morphology, 243, 127–1393.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dryden, I. L. & Mardia, K. V. (1992). Size and shape analysis of landmark data. Biometrika, 79, 57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryden, I. L., & Mardia, K. (1998). Statistical Shape Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons
Eriksen, E., Vesterby, A., Kassen, M., Melsen, F., & Mosekilde, L. (1993). Bone remodeling and bone structure. In Physiology and Pharmacology of Bone, eds. G. Mundy & T. Martin, pp. 67–109. New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
Fehling, P., Alekel, L., Clasey, J., Rector, A. & Stillman, R. (1995). A comparison of bone mineral densities among female athletes in impact loading and active loading sports. Bone, 17, 205–210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fink, W. L. & Zelditch, M. L. (1995). Phylogenetic analysis of ontogenetic shape transformations: A reassessment of the piranha genus Pygocentrus (Teleostei). Systematic Biology, 44, 343–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froment, A. (1992). Correspondence between anatomical differentiation and geographic distribution of modern humans studied by craniometry. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie de Sciences de Paris, 315, 323–329Google Scholar
Giles, E. & Elliot, O. (1962). Race identification from cranial measurements. Journal of Forensic Science, 7, 147–157Google Scholar
Gill, G., & Rhine, S. (eds.) (1990). Skeletal Attribution of Race: Methods for Forensic Anthropology, Anthropological Papers no. 4. Albuquerque: Maxwell Museum of Anthropology
Good, P. (1993). Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses. New York: Springer-Verlag
Guglielmino-Matessi, C., Gluckman, P. & Cavalli-Sforza, L. (1977). Climate and the evolution of skull metrics in man. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 50, 549–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanihara, T. (1992). Population prehistory of East Asia and the Pacific as viewed from craniofacial morphology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 91, 173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanihara, T. (1996). Comparison of craniofacial features of major human groups. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 99, 389–4123.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinonen, A., Oja, P., Kannus, P., Sievanen, H., Haapasalo, H., Manttari, A. & Vuori, I. (1995). Bone mineral density in female athletes representing sports with different loading characteristics of the skeleton. Bone, 17, 197–203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hennessy, R. & Stringer, C. B. (2002). Geometric morphometric study of the regional variation of modern human craniofacial form. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 117, 37–48CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez, M., Fox, C. L., & Garcia Moro, C. (1997). Fueguian cranial morphology: The adaptation to a cold, harsh environment. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 103, 103–1173.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howells, W. W. (1973). Cranial Variation in Man: A Study by Multivariate Analysis of Patterns of Difference among Recent Human Populations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Howells, W. W. (1986). Physical anthropology of the prehistoric Japanese. In Windows on the Japanese Past: Studies in Archaeology and Prehistory, eds. R. Pearson, G. Barnes, & K. Hutterer, pp. 85–99. Ann Arbor: Center for Japanese Studies, University of Michigan
Howells, W. W. (1989). Skull Shapes and the Map: Craniometric Analyses in the Dispersion of Modern Homo. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Howells, W. W. (1995). Who's Who in Skulls: Ethnic Identification of Crania from Measurements. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Hunt, N. (1998). Muscle function and the control of facial form. In Clinical Oral Science, eds. M. Harris, M. Edgar, & S. Meghji, pp. 120–133. Oxford: Wright
Hylander, W., Picq, P., & Johnson, K. (1992). Bone strain and the supraorbital region in primates. In Bone Biodynamics in Orthodontic and Orthopaedic Treatment, eds. D. Carlson & S. Goldstein, pp. 315–349. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development
Kendall, D. G. (1984). Shape manifolds, Procrustean metrics and complex projective spaces. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 16, 81–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurihara, S., Enlow, D. & Rangel, R. (1980). Remodeling reversals in anterior parts of the human mandible and maxilla. Angle Orthodontics, 50, 98–106Google ScholarPubMed
Lahr, M. M. (1995). Patterns of modern human diversification: Implications for Amerindian origins. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 38, 163–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanyon, L. (1993). Skeletal responses to physical loading. In Physiology and Pharmacology of Bone, eds. G. Mundy & T. Martin, pp. 485–505. New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
Lanyon, L. & Rubin, C. (1984). Static versus dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodeling. Journal of Biomechanics, 17, 892–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, S. R. & Cheverud, J. M. (1991). Sexual dimorphism in the baboon facial skeleton. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 84, 193–208CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieberman, D. E. (1996). How and why humans grow thin skulls: Experimental evidence for systemic cortical robusticity. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 101, 217–2363.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieberman, D. E. (2000). Ontogeny, homology and phylogeny in the hominid cranio-facial skeleton: The problem of the browridge. In Development, Growth and Evolution: Implications for the Study of Hominid Skeletal Evolution, eds. P. O'Higgins & M. Cohn, pp. 85–112. London: Academic Press
Lovejoy, C., Meindl, R., Mensforth, R. & Barton, T. (1985). Multifactoral determination of skeletal age at death: A method and blind test of its accuracy. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 68, 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R., Burr, D., & Sharkey, N. (1998). Skeletal Tissue Mechanics. New York: Springer-Verlag
McLachlan, J. (1994). Medical Embryology. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley
Meindl, R. & Lovejoy, C. (1985). Ectocranial suture closure: A revised method for the determination of skeletal age at death and blind tests of its accuracy. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 68, 57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteiro, L. R., Cavalcanti, M. J. & Sommer, H. J. III (1997). Comparative ontogenetic shape changes in the skull of Caiman species (Crocodylia, Alligatoridae). Journal of Morphology, 231, 53–623.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, M. (1964). Vertical growth of the human face. American Journal of Orthodontics, 50, 359–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, M. (1968). The primacy of functional matrices on orofacial growth. Dental Practice, 19, 65–73Google ScholarPubMed
Moss, M. (1997a). The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. I: The role of mechano-transduction. American Journal of Orthodontic and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 112, 8–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, M. (1997b). The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. II: The role of an osseous connected cellular network. American Journal of Orthodontic and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 112, 221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, M. (1997c). The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. III: The genomic thesis. American Journal of Orthodontic and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 112, 338–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, M. (1997d). The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. IV: The epigenetic antithesis and the resolving synthesis. American Journal of Orthodontic and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 112, 410–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, M. & Salentijn, L. (1969a). The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth. American Journal of Orthodontics, 55, 566–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, M. & Saletijn, L. (1969b). The capsular matrix. American Journal of Orthodontics, 56, 474–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M. & Roychoudhury, A. K. (1993). Evolutionary relationships of human populations on a global scale. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 10, 927–943Google ScholarPubMed
Nur, N. & Hasson, O. (1984). Phenotypic plasticity and the handicap principle. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 110, 275–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Higgins, P. (2000). The study of morphological variation in the hominid fossil record: Biology, landmarks, and geometry. Journal of Anatomy, 197, 103–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Higgins, P., & Collard, M. (1999). Facial growth and sexual dimorphism in some papionin species. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 28 (Suppl.), 214Google Scholar
O'Higgins, P., & Collard, M. (2002). Sexual dimorphism and facial growth in papionin monkeys. Journal of Zoology, 257, 255–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Higgins, P., & Jones, N. (1998). Facial growth in Cercocebus torquatus: An application of three-dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphological variation. Journal of Anatomy, 193 (P2), 251–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Higgins, P., & Strand Vi∁arsdóttir, U. (1999). New approaches to the quantitative analysis of craniofacial growth and variation. In Human Growth in the Past: Studies from Bones and Teeth, eds. R. Hoppa & C. Fitzgerald, pp. 128–160. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
O'Higgins, P., Chadfield, P., & Jones, N. (2001). Facial growth and the ontogeny of morphological variation within and between Cebus apella and Cercocebus torquatus. Journal of Zoology, 254, 337–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfitt, A. M., Mathews, C. H. E., Villanueva, A. R., Kleerekoper, M., Frame, B., & Rao, D. S. (1983). Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis: Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 72, 1396–1409CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ponce de León, M., & Zollikofer, C. (2001). Neanderthal cranial ontogeny and its implications for late hominid diversity. Nature, 412, 534–538CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ranly, D. (1980). A Synopsis of Facial Growth. Norwalk: Appleton & Lange
Ravosa, M. J. (1991). The ontogeny of cranial sexual dimorphism in two Old-World monkeys – Macaca fascicularis (Cercopithecinae) and Nasalis larvatus (Colobinae). International Journal of Primatology, 12, 403–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, S. M. (1990). Comparative ontogeny of cranial shape in salamanders using resistant-fit theta rho analysis. In Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop, eds. F. J. Rohlf & F. L. Bookstein, pp. 311–321. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Zoology
Relethford, J. H. (1994). Craniometric variation among modern human populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 95, 53–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Relethford, J. H., & Harpending, H. (1994). Craniometric variation, genetic theory, and modern human origins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 95, 249–270CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhine, S. (1990). Non metric skull racing. In Skeletal Attributions of Race: Methods for Forensic Anthropology, Anthropological Papers no. 4, eds. G. Gill & S. Rhine, pp. 9–20. Albuquerque: Maxwell Museum of Anthropology
Richtsmeier, J. T., Cheverud, J. M., Danahey, S. E., Corner, B. D., & Lele, S. (1993a). Sexual dimorphism of ontogeny in the crab-eating macaque (Macaca fascicularis). Journal of Human Evolution, 25, 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richtsmeier, J. T., Corner, B. D., Grausz, H. M., Cheverud, J. M., & Danahey, S. E. (1993b). The role of postnatal growth pattern in the production of facial morphology. Systematic Biology, 42, 307–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlf, F. J. (1998). On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny. Systematic Biology, 47, 147–158CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohlf, F. J. (1999). Shape statistics: Procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. Journal of Classification, 16, 197–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheuer, L., & Black, S. (2000). Developmental Juvenile Osteology. London: Academic Press
Schour, I., & Massler, M. (1941). The development of the human dentition. Journal of the American Dental Association, 28, 1153–1160Google Scholar
Shea, B. T. (1983). Allometry and heterochrony in the African apes. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 62, 275–289CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, B. T. (1986). Ontogenetic approaches to sexual dimorphism in the anthropoids. Human Evolution, 1, 97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slice, D. E., Bookstein, F. L., Marcus, L. F., & Rohlf, F. J. (1996). A glossary for geometric morphometrics. In Advances in Morphometrics, eds. L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. J. P. Naylor, & D. Slice, pp. 531–551. New York: Plenum Press
Snow, C., Hartman, S., Giles, E., & Young, F. (1979). Sex and race determination of crania by calipers and computers: A test of the Giles and Elliot discriminant function in 52 forensic science cases. Journal of Forensic Science, 24, 448–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1995). Biometry. New York: W. H. Freeman
Sperber, G. (1989). Craniofacial Embryology. Oxford: Wright
Strand Vi∁arsdóttir, U. (1999). Changes in the form of the facial skeleton during growth: A comparative morphometric study of modern humans and Neanderthals. PhD dissertation, University College London
Strand Vi∁arsdóttir, U., & O'Higgins, P. (2001). Geometric morphometrics and the analysis of variations in facial form: Robusticity of biological findings in relation to bilateral versus unilateral and missing landmarks. Statistica, LXI, 315–333Google Scholar
Strand Vi∁arsdóttir, U., O'Higgins, P., & Stringer, C. B. (2002). A geometric morpho-metric study of regional differences in the growth of the modern human facial skeleton. Journal of Anatomy, 201, 211–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stringer, C. B., Dean, M. C., & Humphrey, L. T. (1999). Regional variation in human mandibular morphology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 28 (Suppl.), 260Google Scholar
Turner, C. I. (1992). The dental bridge between Australia and Asia: Following Macintosh into the East Asian heart of humanity. Archaeology of Oceania, 27, 143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubelaker, D. (1989). Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press
Limborgh, J. (1970). A new view on the control of the morphogenesis of the skull. Acta Morphologica Scandinavica, 8, 143Google ScholarPubMed
Weidenreich, F. (1941). The brain and its role in the phylogenetic transformation of the human skull. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 31, 321–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, L., Dufresne, C. R., Richtsmeier, J. T., & Manson, P. N. (1991). The effect of rigid fixation on growth of the neurocranium. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 88, 395–403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, R. (1992). Correlation between cranial form and geography in Homo sapiens: CRANID – a computer program for forensic and other applications. Archaeology of Oceania, 27, 105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×