Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:33:10.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The ‘classical’ genetic epidemiology of schizophrenia

from III - The genetic epidemiology of schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2009

Robin M. Murray
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London
Peter B. Jones
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Ezra Susser
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Jim Van Os
Affiliation:
Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands
Mary Cannon
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London
Get access

Summary

In the mid-1980s, it was widely predicted that family, twin and adoption studies of schizophrenia would be rendered obsolete by the application of molecular genetic techniques to this condition. However, the anticipated advances have yet to occur. Consequently, there has been a revival of interest in the classical genetic epidemiological approach to schizophrenia. Larger and better-designed investigations have been carried out, and new technologies such as brain imaging and neurophysiology have been incorporated into some of these. Family, twin and adoption studies have attempted to answer the following questions:

1 Do genetic factors contribute to the aetiology of schizophrenia? If so,

2 What is the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors?

3 What is the mode of inheritance?

4 What exactly is inherited?

Investigating whether a genetic effect is present

Since the studies that have addressed the first question have often been reviewed, we will only discuss the major findings and the main sources of bias.

Family studies

Family studies (reviewed by Gottesman and Shields, 1982; Kendler and Tsuang, 1988; Gottesman, 1991; Kendler and Diehl, 1993; McGuffin et al., 1994a, 1995) generally depend on the calculation of the lifetime expectation or morbid risk of schizophrenia in the relatives of probands. The lifetime morbid risk is basically the number of affected relatives divided by the total number of relatives, with an adjustment made for the fact that not all relatives will have passed through the period of risk at the time that they are studied.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×