Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:52:56.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Post-treatment imaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Robert Hermans
Affiliation:
University Hospital Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Post-treatment imaging is carried out when a recurrent tumor is suspected, to confirm the presence of such a lesion and to determine its extent. The extent of a recurrent cancer is important information for determining the possibility of salvage therapy.

Imaging may also be used to monitor tumor response and to try to detect recurrent or persistent disease before it becomes clinically evident, possibly with a better chance for successful salvage. However, early tumor recurrence may be difficult to distinguish from tissue changes induced by therapy. Therefore, the expected changes on imaging studies after treatment of a head and neck cancer should be clearly understood when analyzing images.

Treatment complications are less frequent than tumor recurrences, but these conditions may sometimes be clinically difficult to distinguish. Although definitive distinction between treatment-induced necrosis and recurrent tumor may also be difficult radiologically, imaging findings may be helpful in guiding treatment and assessing response to specific treatment.

Expected tissue changes after radiotherapy

The changes visible on post-treatment computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) depend on the radiation dose and rate, the irradiated tissue volume and the time elapsed since the end of radiation therapy. Changes which may be seen include (Fig. 8.1):

  • thickening of the skin and platysma muscle

  • reticulation of the subcutaneous fat and the deep tissue fat layers

  • edema in the retropharyngeal space

  • increased enhancement of the major salivary glands, followed by size reduction of these glands: postirradiation sialadenitis

  • atrophy of lymphatic tissue, in both the lymph nodes and Waldeyer's ring

  • […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mukherji, S. K., Mancuso, A. A., Kotzur, I. M., et al. Radiologic appearance of the irradiated larynx. Part I. Expected changes. Radiology 193 (1994), 141–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Som, P. M., Curtin, H. D., Mancuso, A. A.. An imaging-based classification for the cervical nodes designed as an adjunct to recent clinically based nodal classifications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125 (1999), 388–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermans, R., Pameijer, F. A., Mancuso, A. A., Parsons, J. T., Mendenhall, W. M.. Laryngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: can follow-up CT after definitive radiation therapy be used to detect local failure earlier than clinical examination alone?Radiology 214 (2000), 683–687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, D. L., Barker, J., Chansky, K., et al. Postradiotherapy surveillance practice for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: too much for too little?Head Neck 25 (2003), 990–999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broek, G. B., Rasch, C. R., Pameijer, F. A., et al. Response measurement after intraarterial chemoradiation in advanced head and neck carcinoma: magnetic resonance imaging and evaluation under general anesthesia?Cancer 106 (2006), 1722–1729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukherji, S. K., Wolf, G. T.. Evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after treatment. Am J Neuroradiol 24 (2003), 1743–1746.Google ScholarPubMed
Terhaard, C. H., Bongers, V., Rijk, P. P., Hordijk, G. J.. F-18-Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron-emission tomography scanning in detection of local recurrence after radiotherapy for laryngeal/ pharyngeal cancer. Head Neck 23 (2001), 933–941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitagawa, Y., Nishizawa, S., Sano, K., et al. Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (MRI, CT, and 67Ga scintigraphy) in assessment of combined intraarterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma. J Nucl Med 44 (2003), 198–206.Google ScholarPubMed
Kubota, K., Yokoyama, J., Yamaguchi, K., et al. FDG-PET delayed imaging for the detection of head and neck cancer recurrence after radio-chemotherapy: comparison with MRI/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31 (2004), 590–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrade, R. S., Heron, D. E., Degirmenci, B., et al. Posttreatment assessment of response using FDG-PET/CT for patients treated with definitive radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65 (2006), 1315–1322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branstetter, B. F., Blodgett, T. M., Zimmer, L. A., et al. Head and neck malignancy: is PET/CT more accurate than PET or CT alone?Radiology 235 (2005), 580–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thoeny, H. C., Keyzer, F., Chen, F., et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in monitoring the effect of a vascular targeting agent on rhabdomyosarcoma in rats. Radiology 234 (2005), 756–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandecaveye, V., Keyzer, F., Vander Poorten, V., et al. Evaluation of the larynx for tumor recurrence by diffusion-weighted MRI after radiotherapy: initial experience in four cases. Br J Radiol 79 (2006), 681–687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandecaveye, V., Keyzer, F., Nuyts, S., et al. Detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with diffusion weighted MRI after (chemo)radiotherapy: correlation between radiologic and histopathologic findings. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67 (2007), 960–971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pellitteri, P. K., Ferlito, A., Rinaldo, A., et al. Planned neck dissection following chemoradiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: is it necessary for all?Head Neck 28 (2006), 166–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liauw, S. L., Mancuso, A. A., Amdur, R. J., et al. Postradiotherapy neck dissection for lymph node-positive head and neck cancer: the use of computed tomography to manage the neck. J Clin Oncol 24 (2006), 1421–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, J. W., Greven, K. M., McGuirt, W. F., et al. Can post-RT neck dissection be omitted for patients with head-and-neck cancer who have a negative PET scan after definitive radiation therapy?Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58 (2004), 694–697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castaigne, C., Muylle, K., Flamen, P.. Positron emission tomography in head and neck cancer. In Head and Neck Cancer Imaging, ed. Hermans, R. (Berlin: Springer, 2006), pp. 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, M., Graham, M. M., Hoffman, H. T., et al. The role of post-radiation therapy FDG PET in prediction of necessity for post-radiation therapy neck dissection in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59 (2004), 1001–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porceddu, S. V., Jarmolowski, E., Hicks, R. J., et al. Utility of positron emission tomography for the detection of disease in residual neck nodes after (chemo)radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Head Neck 27 (2005), 175–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visscher, A. V., Manni, J. J.. Routine long-term follow-up in patients treated with curative intent for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, pharynx, and oral cavity. Does it make sense?Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120 (1994), 934–939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooney, T. R., Poulsen, M. G.. Is routine follow-up useful after combined-modality therapy for advanced head and neck cancer?Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125 (1999), 379–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marx, R. E.. Osteoradionecrosis: a new concept of its pathophysiology. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41 (1983), 283–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermans, R.. Imaging of mandibular osteoradionecrosis. Neuroimaging Clin North Am 13 (2003), 597–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chong, J., Hinckley, L. K., Ginsberg, L. E.. Masticator space abnormalities associated with mandibular osteoradionecrosis: MR and CT findings in five patients. Am J Neuroradiol 21 (2000), 175–178.Google ScholarPubMed
Hermans, R., Pameijer, F. A., Mancuso, A. A., Parsons, J. T., Mendenhall, W. M.. CT findings in chondroradionecrosis of the larynx. Am J Neuroradiol 19 (1998), 711–718.Google ScholarPubMed
Becker, M., Schroth, G., Zbaren, P., et al. Long-term changes induced by high-dose irradiation of the head and neck region: imaging findings. Radiographics 17 (1997), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×