Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T15:51:33.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The case for biopsy in the modern management of renal cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2009

By
Colin P. Cantwell ,
Debra Gervais  and
Peter R. Mueller
Edited by
Uday Patel
Colin P. Cantwell
Affiliation:
Division of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, General Hospital, Boston, USA
Debra Gervais
Affiliation:
Division of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, General Hospital, Boston, USA
Peter R. Mueller
Affiliation:
Division of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, General Hospital, Boston, USA
Uday Patel
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital, London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In the past, focal renal biopsy had a limited role in the management of renal masses. Potential complications and an overestimated risk of seeding the biopsy tract dissuaded operators from biopsy, and when performed definitive results were uncommon. Hence, urologists presumed that solid renal lesions over 3 cm and complex cysts were predominantly renal cell carcinomas (RCC) and rarely performed biopsy before surgical procedures.

Attitudes have changed to renal biopsy for a number of reasons, firstly, histological techniques have become more reliable. The morphology, immunocytochemical, and genetic profiles of RCC and its subtypes have been better described. Immunohistochemistry and special stains and genetic test are available to help differentiate tumor subtypes. Oncocytoma, oncocytic cancers, RCC and fat poor angiomyolipomas (AML) can now be differentiated histologically. There has also been a downward-stage migration of renal tumors at diagnosis and a substantial fraction of contemporary solid renal masses are benign. In one study, 12.8% of solid renal masses were found to be benign. When stratified by size, the proportion of benign masses was 25% for masses smaller than 3 cm, 30% for masses smaller than 2 cm, and 44% for masses smaller than 1 cm. Furthermore, small solid benign renal masses cannot be reliably distinguished from malignant masses by means of imaging findings alone.

Type
Chapter
Information
Carcinoma of the Kidney , pp. 112 - 125
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Duchene, D. A., Lotan, Y., Cadeddu, J. A.et al., Histopathology of surgically managed renal tumors: analysis of a contemporary series. Urology, 62 (2003), 827–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozen, H., Colowick, A., and Freiha, F. S., Incidentally discovered solid renal masses: what are they?Br J Urol, 72 (1993), 274–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dechet, C. B., Bostwick, D. G., Blute, M. L.et al., Renal oncocytoma: multifocality, bilateralism, metachronous tumor development and coexistent renal cell carcinoma. J Urol, 162 (1999), 40–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filipas, D., Fichtner, J., Spix, C.et al., Nephron-sparing surgery of renal cell carcinoma with a normal opposite kidney: long-term outcome in 180 patients. Urology, 56 (2000), 387–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, I., Blute, M. L., Cheville, J. C.et al., Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol, 170 (2003), 2217–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, G., Cuilleron, M., Gentil-Perret, A.et al., Characteristics of image-detected solid renal masses: implication for optimal treatment. Int J Urol, 11 (2004), 63–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKiernan, J., Yossepowitch, O., Kattan, M. W.et al., Partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumors: pathologic findings and impact on outcome. Urology, 60 (2002), 1003–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, D. A., Morash, C., Brenner, P.et al., Pathologic findings at the time of nephrectomy for renal mass. Ann Surg Oncol, 4 (1997), 570–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuncali, K., vanSonnenberg, E., Shankar, S.et al., Evaluation of patients referred for percutaneous ablation of renal tumors: importance of a preprocedural diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 183 (2004), 575–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, B. J., Khan, M. A., McGovern, F.et al., Imaging guided biopsy of renal masses: indications, accuracy and impact on clinical management. J Urol, 161 (1999), 1470–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosniak, M. A., The small (less than or equal to 3.0 cm) renal parenchymal tumor: detection, diagnosis, and controversies. Radiology, 179 (1991), 307–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skinner, D. G., Colvin, R. B., Vermillion, C. D.et al., Diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinoma. A clinical and pathologic study of 309 cases. Cancer, 28 (1971), 1165–77.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Konnak, J. W. and Grossman, H. B., Renal cell carcinoma as an incidental finding. J Urol, 134 (1985), 1094–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shintaku, I., Suzuki, Y., Uchi, K.et al., Characteristics of incidentally detected renal cell carcinoma by ultrasonography at health check-up. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi, 91 (2000), 43–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Russo, P., Localized renal cell carcinoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol, 2 (2001), 447–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luciani, L. G., Cestari, R., and Tallarigo, C., Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982–1997). Urology, 56 (2000), 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homma, Y., Kawabe, K., Kitamura, T.et al., Increased incidental detection and reduced mortality in renal cancer – recent retrospective analysis at eight institutions. Int J Urol, 2 (1995), 77–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bos, S. D., Mellema, C. T., and Mensink, H. J., Increase in incidental renal cell carcinoma in the northern part of the Netherlands. Eur Urol, 37 (2000), 267–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jayson, M. and Sanders, H., Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma. Urology, 51 (1998), 203–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bretheau, D., Lechevallier, E., Eghazarian, C.et al., Prognostic significance of incidental renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol, 27 (1995), 319–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chow, W. H., Devesa, S. S., Warren, J. L.et al., Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States. JAMA, 281 (1999), 1628–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hock, L. M., Lynch, J., and Balaji, K. C., Increasing incidence of all stages of kidney cancer in the last 2 decades in the United States: an analysis of surveillance, epidemiology and end results program data. J Urol, 167 (2002), 57–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverman, S. G., Deuson, T. E., Kane, N.et al., Percutaneous abdominal biopsy: cost-identification analysis. Radiology, 206 (1998), 429–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dechet, C. B., Sebo, T., Farrow, G.et al., Prospective analysis of intraoperative frozen needle biopsy of solid renal masses in adults. J Urol, 162 (1999), 1282–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rybicki, F. J., Shu, K. M., Cibas, E. S.et al., Percutaneous biopsy of renal masses: sensitivity and negative predictive value stratified by clinical setting and size of masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 180 (2003), 1281–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lechevallier, E., Andre, M., Barriol, D.et al., Fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses with helical CT guidance. Radiology, 216 (2000), 506–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barriol, D., Lechevallier, E., Andre, M.et al., CT-guided percutaneous fine needle biopsy of solid tumors of the kidney. Prog Urol, 10 (2000), 1145–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Caoili, E. M., Bude, R. O., Higgins, E. J.et al., Evaluation of sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 179 (2002), 373–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eshed, I., Elias, S., and Sidi, A. A., Diagnostic value of CT-guided biopsy of indeterminate renal masses. Clin Radiol, 59 (2004), 262–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hara, I., Miyake, H., Hara, S. Set al., Role of percutaneous image-guided biopsy in the evaluation of renal masses. Urol Int, 67 (2001), 199–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mignon, F., Mesurolle, B., Ariche-Cohen, M.et al., Value of CT-guided renal biopsies: retrospective review of 67 cases. J Radiol, 82 (2001), 907–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Richter, F., Kasabian, N. G., Irwin, R. J. Jr.et al., Accuracy of diagnosis by guided biopsy of renal mass lesions classified indeterminate by imaging studies. Urology, 55 (2000), 348–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horwitz, C. A., Manivel, J. C., Inampudi, S.et al., Diagnostic difficulties in the interpretation of needle aspiration material from large renal cysts. Diagn Cytopathol, 11 (1994), 380–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, S. P., Kung, I. T., and Tang, S. K., Fine-needle aspiration of cystic nephroma (multilocular cyst of the kidney). Diagn Cytopathol, 8 (1992), 349–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilotti, S., Rilke, F., Alasio, L.et al., The role of fine needle aspiration in the assessment of renal masses. Acta Cytol, 32 (1988), 1–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Leiman, G., Audit of fine needle aspiration cytology of 120 renal lesions. Cytopathology, 1 (1990), 65–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orell, S. R., Langlois, S. L., and Marshall, V. R., Fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of solid renal and adrenal masses. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 19 (1985), 211–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, C. W., Burwood, R. J., Harrison, N. W.et al., Aspiration cytology of solid renal tumours. Br J Urol, 55 (1983), 249–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herts, B. R. and Baker, M. E., The current role of percutaneous biopsy in the evaluation of renal masses. Semin Urol Oncol, 13 (1995), 254–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Campbell, S. C., Novick, A. C., Herts, B.et al., Prospective evaluation of fine needle aspiration of small, solid renal masses: accuracy and morbidity. Urology, 50 (1997), 25–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tallada, N., Martinez, S., and Raventos, A., Cytologic study of renal angiomyolipoma by fine-needle aspiration biopsy: report of four cases. Diagn Cytopathol, 10 (1994), 37–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, P. T., Nazarian, L. N., Feld, R. I.et al., Sonographically guided renal mass biopsy: indications and efficacy. J Ultrasound Med, 20 (2001), 749–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaff, A., Molinie, V., Mellot, F.et al., Evaluation of imaging-guided fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses. Eur Radiol, 15 (2005), 1721–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renshaw, A. A., Lee, K. R., Madge, R.et al., Accuracy of fine needle aspiration in distinguishing subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Acta Cytol, 41 (1997), 987–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harisinghani, M. G., Maher, M. M., Gervais, D. A.et al., Incidence of malignancy in complex cystic renal masses (Bosniak Category III): should imaging-guided biopsy precede surgery?AJR Am J Roentgenol, 180 (2003), 755–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renshaw, A. A., Granter, S. R., and Cibas, E. S.,. Fine-needle aspiration of the adult kidney. Cancer, 81 (1997), 71–88.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosniak, M. A., The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology, 158 (1986), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ralls, P. W., Barakos, J. A., Kaptein, E. M.et al., Renal biopsy-related haemorrhage: frequency and comparison of CT and sonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 11 (1987), 1031–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vassiliades, V. G. and Bernardino, M. E., Percutaneous renal and adrenal biopsies. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 14 (1991), 50–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, E. H., Complications of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy: review. Radiology, 178 (1991), 253–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abe, M. and Saitoh, M., Selective renal tumour biopsy under ultrasonic guidance. Br J Urol, 70 (1992), 7–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auvert, J., Abbou, C. C., and Lavarenne, V., Needle tract seeding following puncture of renal oncocytoma. Prog Clin Biol Res, 100 (1982), 597–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Gibbons, R. P., Bush, W. H. Jr., and Burnett, L. L.,. Needle tract seeding following aspiration of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol, 118 (1977), 865–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiser, G. C., Totonchy, M., and Barry, J. M., Needle tract seeding after percutaneous renal adenocarcinoma aspiration. J Urol, 136 (1986), 1292–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shenoy, P. D., Lakhkar, B. N., Ghosh, M. K.et al., Cutaneous seeding of renal carcinoma by Chiba needle aspiration biopsy: case report. Acta Radiol, 32 (1991), 50–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wehle, M. J. and Grabstald, H., Contraindications to needle aspiration of a solid renal mass: tumor dissemination by renal needle aspiration. J Urol, 136 (1986), 446–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The case for biopsy in the modern management of renal cancer
    • By Colin P. Cantwell, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, General Hospital, Boston, USA, Debra Gervais, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, General Hospital, Boston, USA, Peter R. Mueller, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, General Hospital, Boston, USA
  • Edited by Uday Patel, St George's Hospital, London
  • Book: Carcinoma of the Kidney
  • Online publication: 08 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545436.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The case for biopsy in the modern management of renal cancer
    • By Colin P. Cantwell, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, General Hospital, Boston, USA, Debra Gervais, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, General Hospital, Boston, USA, Peter R. Mueller, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, General Hospital, Boston, USA
  • Edited by Uday Patel, St George's Hospital, London
  • Book: Carcinoma of the Kidney
  • Online publication: 08 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545436.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The case for biopsy in the modern management of renal cancer
    • By Colin P. Cantwell, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, General Hospital, Boston, USA, Debra Gervais, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, General Hospital, Boston, USA, Peter R. Mueller, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, General Hospital, Boston, USA
  • Edited by Uday Patel, St George's Hospital, London
  • Book: Carcinoma of the Kidney
  • Online publication: 08 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545436.008
Available formats
×