Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Section I Information problems
- Section II End of life care
- Section III Pregnant women and children
- Section IV Genetics and biotechnology
- Introduction
- 20 Organ transplantation
- 21 Regenerative medicine
- 22 Genetic testing and screening
- 23 Bio-banking
- 24 Behavioral genetics
- Section V Research ethics
- Section VI Health systems and institutions
- Section VII Using clinical ethics to make an impact in healthcare
- Section VIII Global health ethics
- Section IX Religious and cultural perspectives in bioethics
- Section X Specialty bioethics
- Index
- References
23 - Bio-banking
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 October 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Section I Information problems
- Section II End of life care
- Section III Pregnant women and children
- Section IV Genetics and biotechnology
- Introduction
- 20 Organ transplantation
- 21 Regenerative medicine
- 22 Genetic testing and screening
- 23 Bio-banking
- 24 Behavioral genetics
- Section V Research ethics
- Section VI Health systems and institutions
- Section VII Using clinical ethics to make an impact in healthcare
- Section VIII Global health ethics
- Section IX Religious and cultural perspectives in bioethics
- Section X Specialty bioethics
- Index
- References
Summary
For many years, physicians at a cancer clinic have been storing biological samples left over after being used for diagnosis in clinical testing. Prior to 2000, no consent for storage or research was obtained. In 2000, the clinic changed its policy and began to systematically request consent for the use and storage of leftover biological samples “for future cancer research.” From that point on, the clinic has been storing samples only when the patient consented. It discards samples when the patient does not consent. Many of the sample donors are still alive (some are still patients at the clinic), while others have died. The clinic now has over 4000 samples, with comprehensive clinical data. Two groups of geneticists would like to use the samples for research, one examining the genetic basis of certain cancers, and the other examining the genetic basis of ethnicity and drug response in a randomized, heterogeneous population study.
What is bio-banking?
Our knowledge of genetics has largely transformed the manner in which biomedical research takes place. From the Human Genome Project and the International HapMap Consortium, we now know the sequence of the human genome, and we have created a haplotype map of the human genome, describing the common patterns of haplotype ancestry.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics , pp. 166 - 173Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
(2004). The social and ethical issues of post-genomic human biobanks. Nat Rev Genet 5: 866–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2004). Genetic Research and Privacy: Advisory Memorandum. Ottawa: Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee (http://cbac-cccb.ca/epic/internet/incbaccccb.nsf/vwapj/genetic_research_privacy.pdf/$FILE/genetic_research privacy.pdf) accessed 24 February 2005.Google Scholar
(2005). Best Practices for Protecting Privacy in Health Research. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada (http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/documents/et_pbp_nov05_sept2005_e.pdf).Google Scholar
(2002). International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (http://www.cioms.chlframe_guidelines_nov_2002.htm) accessed 27 March 2006.Google Scholar
(2004). Paris: Government of France.
(2005). Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine concerning Biomedical Research. CETS No. 195, art. 14. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
(2006). Recommendation Rec(2006)4 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Research on Biological Materials of Human Origin. Strasbourg: European Commission (http://www.coe.int/t/e/legal_affairs/legal_co-operation/bioethics/activities/biomedical_research/Rec%20biomat%20CM.pdf) accessed 26 May 2006.Google Scholar
(2006). Draft Recommendation on Research on Biological Materials of Human Origin. Strasbourg: Council of Europe (http://www.coe.int/T/E/Legal affairs/Legal co-operation/Bioethics/News/Misc%20_2005_%203e%2OREV%20final.pdf) accessed 29 March 2006.Google Scholar
(2004). The 25 Recommendations on the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Genetic Testing. Brussels: European Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/research/conferences/2004/genetic/pdf/recommendations_en.pdf) accessed 26 May 2006.Google Scholar
(2001). Data Storage and DNA Banking for Biomedical Research: Technical, Social and Ethical Issues. Birmingham: European Society of Human Genetics (http://www.eshg.org/ESHGDNAbankingrec.pdf) accessed 28 March 2006.Google Scholar
, , and (2004). Biobanks: will they help promote the genomics revolution?Pharm Disc 4: 20–4.Google Scholar
and (2005). Will investments in large-scale prospective cohorts and biobanks limit our ability to discover weaker, less common genetic and environmental contributors to complex diseases?Environ Health Persp 113: 119–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1998). Statement on DNA sampling: control and access. Genome Digest 6: 8. (http://www.hugo-inter national.org/statement_on_DNA_sampling.htm) accessed 2 October 2007.Google Scholar
(2002). Statement on Human Genomic Databases. London: Human Genome Organization (http://www.hugo-international.org/Statement_ on_Human_Genomic_Databases.htm) accessed 2 October 2007.Google Scholar
Human Tissue Act 2004. c. 30, s. 1(7–9), Schedule 5 paragraph 10 (http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2004/20040030.htm).
(2006). Rule to protect records may doom long-term heart study. Scientist 311: 1547–58.Google ScholarPubMed
and (2005). Human genetic research: emerging trends in ethics. Nat Rev Genet 6: 75–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (2005). The Babel of genetic data terminology. Nat Biotechnol 23: 925–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoppers, B. M. and Sallée, C. (2005). Ethical aspects of genome research and banking. In Handbook of Genome Research: Genomics, Proteomics, Metabolomics, Bioinformatics, Ethical and Legal Issues, Vol. 2, ed. . Chichester, UK: John Wiley, pp. 507–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2004. Paris: Government of France.
(2004). Biobanks for Research-Opinion. [Nationaler Ethikrat] regulatory proposal 3. Bonn: Nationaler Ethikrat (http://www.ethikrat.org/_english/publications/Opinion_Biobanks-for-research.pdf) accessed 24 February 2005.Google Scholar
(1947). Article 1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office (http://www.ushmm.org/research/doctors/Nuremberg_Code.htm).Google Scholar
(2005). The new Human Tissue Bill: categorization and definitional issues and their implications. Genom Soc and Pol 1: 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). Expanding the ethical analysis of biobanks. J Law Med Ethics 33: 154–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2002). Biobanks in Medical Care Act. [Unofficial translation.] Stockholm: Government of Sweden.Google Scholar
(1998). Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Ottawa: Medical Research Council, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/english/pdf/TCPS%20June2003_E.pdf) accessed 30 March 2005.Google Scholar
(2003). International Declaration on Human Genetic Data. Paris: UNESCO (http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/file_download.php/6016a4bea4c293a23e913 de638045ea9Declaration_en.pdf) accessed 2 October 2007.Google Scholar
(2005). Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Paris: UNESCO (arts. 5 and 6. (http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO= DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201. html) accessed 2 October 2007.Google Scholar
(2003). Genetic Privacy and Nondiscrimination Act, s.131 and s.133. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
(2003a). Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Volume 46.101(b)(4). Washington, DC: Government Printing office.Google Scholar
(2003b). Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Volume 46.102(f). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
(2005). Code of Federal Regulations Title 45, Volume 46.116(d). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
(1999). Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance, Table 2.2, p. 18. Rockville, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Committee (http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/hbm.pdf) accessed 4 October 2005.Google Scholar
(2006). First-generation Guidelines for NCI-supported Biorepositories. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health. (NB First iteration document, revised and renamed the NCI Best Practices for Biospecimen Resources in June 2007.)Google Scholar
(2004). Guidance on Research Involving Coded Private Information or Biological Specimens. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services (http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/cdebiol.pdf) accessed 23 March 2005.Google Scholar
(2006). One-time general consent for research on biological samples. BMJ 332: 544–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2003). Genetic Databases: Assessing the Benefits and the Impact on Human and Patient Rights. Geneva: World Health Organization (http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrb/publications/online/whofinalreport.pdf) accessed 27 March 2006.Google Scholar
World Medical Association (1964). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [revised 1975, 1983, 1989, 1996, 2000]. Washington, DC: World Medical Association (http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm).
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 3
- Cited by