Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T02:17:31.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

34 - Disclosure of medical error

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Philip C. Hébert
Affiliation:
Bioethicist and Director of the Clinical Ethics Centre University of Toronto, Canada
Alex V. Levin
Affiliation:
Associate Professor University of Toronto, Canada
Gerald Robertson
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law University of Alberta
Peter A. Singer
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
A. M. Viens
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

A 77-year-old farmer with recurring kidney stones visits his urologist for an annual examination. Prior to seeing the patient, the physician is taken aside by her nurse, who tells her the patient had been in the emergency department the previous night with hematuria. A CAT scan had been done, which indicated that the renal tumor seen on last year's CAT scan was larger and there were now lung metastases. The physician cannot remember ever seeing the radiology report from last year. To her complete surprise, it is found filed in the patient's chart. There is no record in the chart that the results were ever shared with the patient. She considers herself extremely meticulous and has never had such an oversight before. The urologist considers what she should tell the patient.

A 12-year-old boy has cataract surgery at a large teaching hospital. At a critical moment the surgeon's hand slips, severely rupturing the lens capsule. The planned implantation of an intraocular lens has to be abandoned. Instead, the patient will have to use a contact lens. The physician wonders what he should tell the patient and his family about the surgery.

What is medical error?

Well-publicized reports of harm occurring to patients as a result of their medical care in the USA (Patient Safety Foundation, 1998), Canada (Sinclair, 1994) and the UK (Smith, 1998) have raised public concerns about the safety of modern healthcare.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American College of Physicians and Surgeons (2005). Ethics manual, 5th edn, Ann Intern Med 142: 560–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker G. R., Norton P. G., Flintcroft, V., et al. (2004). The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ170: pp. 1678–86 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query. fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_ uids=15159366).
Blendon, R. J., DesRoches, C. M., Brodie, M., et al. (2002). Views of practicing physicians and the public on medical errors. N Engl J Med 347: 1933–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogardus, S. T. Jr., Holmboe, E., Jekel, J., et al. (1999). Perils, pitfalls, and possibilities in talking about medical risk. JAMA 281: 1037–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bok, S. (1979). Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York: Vintage Books, p. 71.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. A., Leape, L. L., Laird, N., et al. (1991). Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med 324: 370–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckman, R., Korsch, B., Baile, W., et al. (1998). A Practical Guide to Communication Skills in Clinical Practice. [CD–ROM set.] Toronto: Medical Audio Visual Communications.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute for Health Information (2004). Health Care in Canada. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Canadian Medical Association (2004). Code of Ethics. Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association. (http://www.cma.ca/index.cfm/ci_id/2419/la_id/1.htm) accessed 31 July 2006.
Canadian Medical Protective Association (2000). Disclosing Adverse Events to Patients: CMPA Information Sheet. Ottawa: Canadian Medical Protective Association.Google Scholar
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (1994). Policies. Professional Misconduct. Toronto: College of Physicians and Surgeons (http://www.cpso.on.ca/Policies/profmisc.htm) accessed 22 December 2000.
Cullen, D., Bates, D., Small, C., et al. (1995). The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 21: 541–8.Google Scholar
Davies, J., Hébert, P., and Hoffman, C., (2003). The Canadian Patient Safety Dictionary. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.Google Scholar
ECRI (2002). Disclosure of unanticipated outcomes. Healthc Risk ContrRA:IRM 5 (Suppl A): 1–27.
ENEAS (2005). Report. National Study on Hospitalisation-Related Adverse Events. Madrid: Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs Madrid (http://www.who.int/patientsafety/research/RESUMEN.ENEAS_INGLES.pdf) accessed 22 August 2006.
Etchells E., Sharpe G., Walsh, P., et al. (1999). Consent. In Bioethics at the Bedside, ed. Singer, P.. Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, D., Wu, A. W., Holtzman, N., et al. (1997). When a physician harms a patient by a medical error: ethical, legal, and risk–management considerations. J Clin Ethics 8: 330–5.Google Scholar
Gawande, A. A., Thomas, E. J., Zinner, M., et al. (1999). The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery 126: 66–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerula v. Flores (1995). 126 DLR (4th) 506, 128 (Ont CA).
Goldman, R. L. (1992). The reliability of peer assessments of quality of care. JAMA 267: 958–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldmann, D. (2006). System failure versus personal accountability: the case for clean hands. N Engl J Med 355: 121–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hébert, P. (2008). Doing Right. A Practical Guide to Ethics. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilfiker, D. (1984). Facing our mistakes. N Engl J Med 310: 118–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hobgood, C., Weiner, B., and Tamayo-Sarver, J. H. (2006). Medical error identification, disclosure, and reporting: do emergency medicine provider groups differ?Acad Emerg Med 13: 443–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Illinois 93rd General Assembly (2005). Patient Safety Act. Bill HB4245. (http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus_pf.asp?DocNum=4245&DocTypeID=HB&LegID=8461&GAID=3&SessionID=3&GA=93) accessed 6 July 2006.
Irving, M., Berwick, D. M., Rubin, P., et al. (1998). Five times: coincidence or something more serious. BMJ 316: 1736–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapp, M. B. (1997). Legal anxieties and medical mistakes: barriers and pretexts. J Gen Intern Med 12: 787–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kent, C. (2005). Medical Ethics: The State of the Law. Toronto: LexisNexis Butterworths.Google Scholar
Kohn, L., Corrigan, J., and Donaldson, M. S. (eds.) (2000). To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Kraman, S. S. and Hamm, G. (1999). Risk management: extreme honesty may be the best policy. Ann Intern Med 131: 963–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamb, R. M., Studdert, D. M., Bohner, R. M., et al. (2003). Hospital disclosure practices: results of a national survey. Health Aff (Millwood) 22: 73–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lansky, D. (2002). Improving quality through public disclosure of performance information. Health Aff (Millwood) 21: 52–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lantos, J. (1997). Do We Still Need Doctors?New York: Routledge, pp. 116–32.Google Scholar
Leape, L. L. (1994a). Error in medicine. JAMA 272: 1851–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leape, L. L. (1994b). The preventability of medical injury. In Human Error in Medicine, ed. Bogner, M. S.. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 13–25.Google Scholar
Leape, L. L., Brennan, T. A., Laird, N., et al. (1991). The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med 324: 377–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leape, L. L., Woods, D. D., Hattie, M., et al. (1998). Promoting patient safety by preventing medical error. JAMA 280: 1444–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Legislative Assembly of Quebec (2006). R.Q., c. M–9, r.4.1. Section 56.
Levinson, W., Roter, D. L., Mulloly, J., et al. (1997). Physician–patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA 277: 553–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Localio, A. R., Lawthers, A. G., Brennan, T., et al. (1991). Relation between malpractice claims and adverse events due to negligence. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study III. N Engl J Med 325: 245–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazor, K. M., Simon, S. R., Yood, R. A., et al. (2004). Health plan members' views about disclosure of medical errors. Ann Intern Med 140: 409–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazor, K. M., Simon, S. R., Yood, R. A., et al. (2005). Health plan members' views on forgiving medical errors. Am J Manag Care 11: 49–52.Google ScholarPubMed
McGlynn, E. A., Asch, S. M., Adams, T., et al. (2003). The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 348: 2635–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, M. C. (1996). The emotional impact of mistakes on family physicians. Arch Fam Med 5: 71–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oklahoma State Legislature (2004). Act Relating to Public Health and Safety. SB 1592. Oklahoma City: State Printing Office.
Ontario Hospital Association (2005). Patient Safety in Ontario: An Overview of Patient Safety Policies in Select Ontario Academic Hospitals. Toronto: Ontario Hospital Association.Google Scholar
Patient Safety Foundation (1998). Tale of Two Stories: Contrasting Views of Patient Safety. North Adams, MA: Patient Safety Foundation (http://www.npsf.org/exec/report.html).
Picard, E. and Robertson, G. (1996). Legal Liability of Doctors and Hospitals in Canada, 3rd edn. Toronto: Carswell, pp. 170–2.Google Scholar
Robertson, G. (1987). Fraudulent concealment and the duty to disclose medical mistakes. Albert Law Rev 25: 215–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Rubin, H. R., Rogers, W. H., Robertson, L., et al. (1992). Watching the doctor-watchers. How well do peer review organization methods detect hospital care quality problems?JAMA 267: 2349–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, D. (2003). Delivering Doctor Miranda: The Story of a Gifted Young Obstetrician's Mistake and the Psychiatrist who Helped Her. New York: Harmony Books.Google Scholar
Sharpe, G. (1987). The Law and Medicine in Canada, 2nd edn. Toronto: Butterworths, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
Shobridge v. Thomas (1999). BCJ no. 1747 (SC. online: QL (BCJ).
Shore, S. (2004). No Moral Conscience: The Hospital for Sick Children and the Death of Lisa Shore. Toronto: Trafford.Google Scholar
Sinclair, M. (1994). The Report of the Manitoba Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Inquest: An Inquiry into Twelve Deaths at the Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre in 1994. Winnipeg: Manitoba Health (http://www.pediatriccardiacinquest.mb.ca).
Smith, M. A., Atherly, A. J., Kane, R., et al. (1997). Peer review of the quality of care. Reliability and sources of variability for outcome and process assessments. JAMA 278: 1573–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R. (1998). All changed, changed utterly. British medicine will be transformed by the Bristol case. BMJ 316: 1917–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamos v. Davies (1985). 21 DLR (4th) 507 (Ont HC).
UK Department of Health (2000). An Organisation with a Memory: Report of an Expert Group on Learning from Adverse Events in the NHS. London: The Stationery Office (http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/06/50/86/04065086.pdf) accessed 31 July 2006.
VA Healthcare Network (1998). Integrated Patient Safety/Risk Management Program. New York: Veterans Health Administration (http://www.va.gov) accessed 22 December 2000.
Vasdani v. Sehmi (1993). OJ no. 44 (Gen Div) online: QL (OJ).
Vincent, C., Young, M., and Phillips, A. (1994). Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action. Lancet 343: 1609–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincent, C., Stanhope, N., Crowley-Murphy, P. I., et al. (1999). Reasons for not reporting adverse incidents: an empirical study. J Eval Clin Pract 5: 13–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walton, M. For the Clinical Practice Improvement Unit (2001). Open Disclosure to Parents or Families After an Adverse Event. A Literature Review. Sydney: Clinical Practice Improvement Unit (http://www.nsh.nsw.gov.au/teachresearch/cpiu/CPIUwebdocs/WebversionLiteratureReview.pdf) accessed 31 July 2006.
Wilson, D. S., McElligott, J., Fielding, L., et al. (1992). Identification of preventable trauma deaths: confounded inquiries?J Trauma 32: 45–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, R. M., Runciman, W. B., Gibbard, R. W., et al. (1995). The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 163: 458–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Witman, A. B., Park, D. M., Hardin, S., et al. (1996). How do patients want physicians to handle mistakes? A survey of internal medicine patients in an academic setting. Arch Intern Med 156: 2565–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, A. W., Cavanaugh, T. A., McPhee, S. J., et al. (1997). To tell the truth: ethical and practical issues in disclosing medical mistakes to patients. J Gen Intern Med 12: 770–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×