Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T02:07:01.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

59 - Guidelines for researchers and for ethics committees on psychiatric research involving human participants – executive summary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Sue Eckstein
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

1 The responsibility for the ethical conduct of research rests firmly on the principal investigator.

2.1 In considering whether a procedure is research or not, LRECs and researchers are referred to the Royal College of Physicians (1996) guidelines, paragraph 6.4.

“The distinction between medical research and innovative medical practice derives from the intent. In medical practice the predominant intent is to benefit the individual patient consulting the clinician, not to gain knowledge of general benefit, though such knowledge may emerge from the clinical experience gained. In medical research the primary intention is to advance knowledge so that patients in general may benefit: the individual patient may or may not benefit directly.”

2.2 It is in the interests of everyone that high quality research should be fostered and supported. Ethics Committees (throughout the report, “Ethics Committees” refers to “Research Ethics Committees dealing with human participants”) need to check that the research they approve is of adequate quality. Because of the immense value of research, it is unacceptable that individuals from any segments of the population be disallowed by virtue of their being members of that group from participation in research that is necessary to improve the understanding of disorders from which they are particularly likely to suffer. The difficulties that must be faced in this connection with groups whose capacity to consent is limited are considered further below in paragraph 5.Nevertheless, it is a basic ethical principle that psychiatric patients, like all other patients, must be able to benefit from the fruits of research and, hence, they must have the opportunity to participate freely in sound research.

Type
Chapter
Information
Manual for Research Ethics Committees
Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King's College London
, pp. 429 - 434
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×