Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-03T19:59:55.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The choice of customary law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

Peter Orebech
Affiliation:
Harvard Law School
Fred Bosselman
Affiliation:
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Jes Bjarup
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
David Callies
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii, Manoa
Martin Chanock
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
Hanne Petersen
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

People choose to use customary law for a wide variety of reasons. Some choose to maximize ethnic identity, some local solidarity, and some adaptation to modern conditions. Customary law provides an important element in all of these situations, whether as a symbol to be treasured, an ideal to be regained, or a tradition to be honored in the adaptation. To blindly assume that customary law will produce sustainable development is naïve. Michael Soulé suggests that the myth of moral superiority of non-western traditions “has led guilt-ridden Westerners to glorify the environmental ethics of non-western traditions … Some indigenous people can provide excellent guidance, some not.”

Customary law in its original form may be a vulnerable instrument wholly dependent upon popular recognition, but it is also a valuable source that should be studied in the never-ending search for ways to accommodate to an environment that has been and will remain constantly changing. The growing volume of case studies of customary systems is evidence of a growing recognition that such systems may be a source of wise resource policies.

Reasons to choose customary law

Why might policy-makers choose to implement customary law systems? A review of the literature suggests that the following are some of the arguments most commonly heard in favor of customary law systems.

Empowerment

Giving a group's customs legal stature may reinforce a group's sense of responsibility that comes with law-making power. Resource user groups themselves often see their traditional customs as a source of potential power for their group.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×