Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T23:37:15.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coal and Colonialism: Production Relations in an Indian Coalfield, c. 1895–1947

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2009

Shahid Amin
Affiliation:
University of Delhi
Marcel van der Linden
Affiliation:
Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The year 1995 marked the centenary of the exploitation of a 400 square-kilometre tract in the Indian province of Bihar known as the Jharia coalfield. From 1895, when rail lines entered the region, until the end of the World War I, coal output in India increased tenfold and the size of the mines' workforce fivefold. By 1907 Jharia was yielding half of India's output. One of its oldest mines was Khas Jharia, which worked a 260-feet deep source. Thirty-four years after it opened, its surface had merged with the outskirts of Jharia township and restrictions were imposed on the dimensions of its galleries. Despite these, Khas Jharia's pillars collapsed on 8 November 1930 causing an 18-feet deep subsidence and widespread destruction. This incident was the proximate cause of an underground fire which rages to this day.

Emissions and subsidences at Khas Jharia continued, despite efforts by the Mines Department and the railways to douse the seams. In 1933 the flaming crevasses alarmed local residents, many of whom deserted their houses. The Bihar earthquake of 1934 enhanced air circulation in the mine, and by 1938 an observer's first impressions of Jharia town were of fissures belching colourful flames. The disaster was the most notorious example of a general malaise: by 1936, 42 of the 133 collieries in the area were on fire.

These phenomena were the more dramatic ramifications of production relations in the coal industry. Like its other features, they may best be comprehended through a contextual analysis of institutional forms. Such an analysis would have a bearing on matters such as mines safety, the organization of natural resources, and the emergence of an Adivasi (tribal) political estate.

Type
Chapter
Information
Peripheral Labour
Studies in the History of Partial Proletarianization
, pp. 83 - 108
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×