Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T16:16:09.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Variations in the disappearance patterns of rugosan corals in Tethys and their implications for environments at the end of the Permian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2009

J. M. Dickins
Affiliation:
Australian Geological Survey Organisation, Canberra
Yang Zunyi
Affiliation:
China University of Geosciences, Wukan
Yin Hongfu
Affiliation:
China University of Geosciences, Wukan
S. G. Lucas
Affiliation:
New Mexico Museum of Natural History
S. K. Acharyya
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of India
Get access

Summary

Both before and after the biologic events near the Permian–Triassic boundary, large-scale extinctions and new appearances of organisms occurred at higher taxonomic levels. Each taxonomic unit has its own terminal phylogenetic history, showing a distinctive disappearance pattern in various ways. Permian corals have been reported from many regions of the world, but the Rugosa became extinct at the end of the Permian (Oliver, 1980; Ezaki, 1989), first disappearing in the Boreal province arid finally in the Tethys province at the latest Changxingian. Although the local disappearance events of rugose corals obviously were heterochronous, all Rugosa had disappeared by the time of formation of the mixed-fauna beds described by Yin (1985). There were no Triassic representatives, which makes positive biostratigraphic determination of the Permian–Triassic boundary using Rugosa impossible. The occurrences of late Permian corals were restricted geographically, but specific groups survived in conditions that were suitable for them. Permian Rugosa provide important case examples of the patterns and processes of the end-Permian extinction and their relationships to environments.

Upper Permian stratigraphy and interregional correlations have been intensively studied in each Tethyan region. Stratigraphic schemes for the Upper Permian have been proposed, for example, by Kotlyar et al. (1989) and Nakazawa (1993), and the standard Permian stratigraphy is based on detailed biostratigraphic analyses, especially using fusulinids, conodonts, and ammonoids.

Type
Chapter

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×