Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T16:19:46.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Limits of Reform: The U.S. Zone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2009

Carolyn Woods Eisenberg
Affiliation:
Hofstra University, New York
Get access

Summary

At every level of Military Government and from one end of the Zone to the other, we encountered the arguments of expediency and convenience, the necessity of “keeping things running,” the dangers of “angering” the Germans and creating a dissatisfied “bloc” which would be ripe for communism, the resentment of lower headquarters against interference from higher headquarters, the fantastic comparison of Nazi politics with Democratic-Republican rivalry in the USA.

(Russell Nixon, Acting Director of the Division of Cartels and External Assets to the Kilgore Committee).

Hitler did restore their self-respect when all men's faces were turned from them. He did stop unemployment. He did give the young people something to live for and something they thought it worthwhile to sacrifice themselves for. And we should not forget that he played on the fear of Bolshevism which loomed a few miles away across Poland. Our views may have been modified in the last few years, but it is fair to ask how many of us can throw stones at people who feared Communism.

(Laird Bell, Deputy Director, Economics Division, Speech to the Chicago Council of Foreign Relations).

Under the Potsdam Accord, the Americans committed themselves to substantial structural change and redistribution of power within German society. Yet during their own planning process, they had been unable to agree on the character of postwar Germany.

Since the Allied victory in May 1945, their longstanding philosophical differences had become focused on several practical issues of occupation: I) what steps should U.S. Military Government take to eradicate Nazism as a significant force in its own zone? 2) what approach should it adopt in treating the large German cartels and combines?

Type
Chapter
Information
Drawing the Line
The American Decision to Divide Germany, 1944–1949
, pp. 121 - 165
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×