Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:14:01.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Neuroimaging in the evaluation of pattern and timing of fetal and neonatal brain abnormalities

from Section 3 - Diagnosis of the infant with brain injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

David K. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
William E. Benitz
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Philip Sunshine
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Susan R. Hintz
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Maurice L. Druzin
Affiliation:
Stanford University School of Medicine, California
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this updated review, current and advanced neuroimaging technologies are discussed, along with the basic principles of imaging diagnosis and guidelines for utilization in fetal, perinatal, and neonatal brain abnormalities. This includes pattern of injury and timing issues, with special emphasis on neurovascular disease and the differential diagnosis. In the causative differentiation of static encephalopathies (e.g., cerebral palsy, CP) from progressive encephalopathies, specific categories and timing are addressed. These include developmental abnormalities, trauma, neurovascular disease, infections and inflammatory processes, and metabolic disorders. Although a rare but important cause of progressive perinatal encephalopathy, neoplastic processes are not considered in detail here. Molecular and genetic technologies continue to advance toward eventual clinical application.

Neuroimaging technologies and general utilization

Imaging modalities may be classified as structural or functional. Structural imaging modalities provide spatial resolution based primarily on anatomic or morphologic data. Functional imaging modalities provide spatial resolution based upon physiologic, chemical, or metabolic data. Some modalities may actually be considered to provide both structural and functional information.

Ultrasonography (US) is primarily a structural imaging modality with some functional capabilities (e.g., Doppler: Fig. 18.1a,b) [1–8,13–26]. It is readily accessible, portable, fast, real-time and multiplanar. It is less expensive than other cross-sectional modalities and relatively non-invasive (non-ionizing radiation). It requires no contrast agent and infrequently needs patient sedation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blankenburg, FG, Barnes, PD. Structural and functional imaging of hypoxic–ischemic injury (HII) in the fetal and neonatal brain. In Stevenson, D, Benitz, W, Sunshine, P, eds., Fetal and Neonatal Brain Injury, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 446–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, P. State of the art: neuroimaging and the timing of fetal and neonatal brain injury. J Perinatol 2001; 21: 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, P, Zimmerman, RA. Perinatal Brain Injury. Neuroimaging: Clinical and Physical Principles. New York, NY: Springer, 2000: 531–83.Google Scholar
Barkovich, A. Pediatric Neuroimaging, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 2005: 190–290.Google Scholar
Volpe, JJ. Neurology of the Newborn, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2001.Google Scholar
Ment, L, Bada, H, Barnes, P, et al. Practice parameter: neuroimaging of the neonate. Neurology 2002; 58: 1726–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferriero, D. Neonatal brain injury. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1985–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkovich, A. MR imaging of the neonatal brain. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006; 16: 117–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutherford, M, Srinivasan, L, Dyet, L, et al. MRI in perinatal brain injury. Pediatr Radiol 2006; 36: 582–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, R, Bilaniuk, L. Neuroimaging evaluation of cerebral palsy. Clin Perinatol 2006; 33: 517–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Triulzi, F, Parazzini, C, Righini, A. Patterns of damage in the mature neonatal brain. Pediatr Radiol 2006; 36: 608–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panigrahy, A, Blumel, S. Advances in MR neuroimaging techniques in the evaluation of neonatal encephalopathy. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 18: 3–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, PD, Taylor, GA. Imaging of the neonatal central nervous system. Neurosurgery Clin North Am 1998; 1: 17–48.Google Scholar
Allison, JW, Seibert, JJ. Transcranial Doppler in the newborn with asphyxia. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1999; 9: 11–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Blankenberg, FG, Loh, N, Bracci, P, et al. Sonography, CT, and MR imaging: a prospective comparison of neonates with suspected intracranial ischemia and hemorrhage. AJNRAm J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 213–18.Google Scholar
Debillon, T, N'Guyen, , Muet, A, et al. Limitations of ultrasonography for diagnosing white matter damage in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88: F275–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laptook, A, O'Shea, M, Shankaran, S, et al. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely low birth weight infants with normal head ultrasound. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 673–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinto-Martin, JA, Riolo, S, Cnaan, A, et al. Cranial ultrasound prediction of disabling and nondisabling cerebral palsy at age two in a low birthweight population. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 249–54.Google Scholar
Maalouf, EF, Duggan, PJ, Counsell, SJ, et al. Comparison of findings on cranial ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in preterm neonates. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 719–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sie, LT, Knapp, MD, Wezel-Meijler, G, et al. Early MR features of hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in neonates with periventricular densities on sonograms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 852–61.Google Scholar
Childs, AM, Cornette, L, Romenghi, , et al. Magnetic resonance and cranial ultrasound characteristics of periventricular white matter abnormalities in newborn infants. Clin Radiol 2001; 56: 647–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roelants-van Rijn, AM, Groenendaal, F, Beek, FJ, et al. Parenchymal brain injury in the preterm infant: comparison of cranial ultrasound, MRI and neurodevelopmental outcome. Neuropediatrics 2001; 32: 80–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inder, TE, Anderson, NJ, Spencer, C, et al. White matter injury in the premature infant: a comparison between serial cranial sonographic and MR findings at term. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 805–9.Google Scholar
Miller, SP, Cozzio, C, Goldstein, RB, et al. Comparing the diagnosis of white matter injury in premature newborns with serial MR imaging and transfontanel ultrasonography findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 1661–9.Google Scholar
Hintz, SR, Slovis, T, Bulas, D, et al. Interobserver reliability and accuracy of cranial ultrasound scanning interpretation in premature infants. J Pediatr 2007; 150: 592–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirmiran, M, Barnes, P, Keller, K, et al. Neonatal brain MRI before discharge is better than serial cranial ultrasound in predicting cerebral palsy in very low birth weight preterm infants. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 992–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slovis, T. Children, computed tomography radiation dose, and the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) concept. Pediatrics 2003; 112: 971–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertinzksy, A, Barnes, P. Macrocephaly, increased intracranial pressure, and hydrocephalus in the infant and young child. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 18: 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, P, Krasnokutsky, M. Imaging of the CNS in suspected or alleged nonaccidental injury, including the mimics. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 18: 53–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukherjee, P. Advanced pediatric imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006; 16(1).Google Scholar
Levine, , D, Barnes, , PD, Robertson, , RR, et al. Fast MR imaging of fetal central nervous system abnormalities. Radiology 2003; 229: 51–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garel, C, Delezide, A, Elmaleh-Berges, M, et al. Contribution of fetal MRI in the evaluation of cerebral ischemic lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 1563–1568.Google ScholarPubMed
Levine, D, Barnes, P. MR imaging of fetal CNS abnormalities. In Levine, D, ed., Atlas of Fetal MRI. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group, 2005: 25–72.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P, Widjaja, E, Paley, M, et al. Imaging of the fetal spine in utero: diagnostic accuracy and impact on management. Pediatr Radiol 2006; 36: 927–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garel, C. New advances in fetal MR neuroimaging. Pediatr Radiol 2006; 36: 621–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glenn, O, Barkovich, J. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine. Part 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1604–11; Part 2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 1807–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Barkovich, AJ, Baranski, K, Vigneron, D, et al. Proton MR spectroscopy in the evaluation of asphyxiated term neonates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 1399–405.Google ScholarPubMed
Vigneron, DB. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of human brain development. Neuroimag Clin N Am 2006; 16; 75–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cecil, K. MR spectroscopy of metabolic disorders. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006; 16: 87–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkovich, A, Miller, S, Bartha, A. MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, and diffusion tensor imaging of sequential studies in neonates with encephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 533–47.Google ScholarPubMed
Wang, J, Licht, D. Pediatric perfusion MRI using arterial spin labeling. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006; 16: 149–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huppi, PS, Maier, SE, Peled, S, et al. Microstructural development of human newborn cerebral white matter assessed in vivo by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Res 1998; 44: 584–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neil, JJ, Shiran, SI, McKinstry, RC. Normal brain in human newborns: apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion anisotropy measured by using diffusion tensor MR imaging. Radiology 1998; 209: 57–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, AJ, Lee, BCP, Lin, W. Echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging in neonates and infants with suspected hypoxic–ischemic injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 172: 219–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Robertson, RL, Ben-Sira, L, Barnes, PD, et al. MR line scan diffusion imaging of term neonates with perinatal brain ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 1658–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Phillips, MD, Zimmerman, RA. Diffusion imaging in pediatric hypoxic-ischemic injury. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 1999; 9: 41–52.Google Scholar
Inder, T, Huppi, PS, Zientara, GP, et al. Early detection of periventricular leukomalacia by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging techniques. J Pediatr 1999; 134: 631–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inder, TE, Huppi, PS, Warfield, S, et al. Periventricular white matter injury in the premature infant followed by reduced cerebral cortical gray matter volume at term. Ann Neurol 1999; 46: 755–60.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huppi, PS, Murphy, B, Maier, SE, et al. Microstructural brain development after perinatal cerebral white matter injury assessed by diffusion tensor MR imaging. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 455–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arzoumanian, Y, Mirmiran, M, Barnes, P, et al. Diffusion tensor brain imaging findings at term-equivalent age may predict neurologic abnormalities in low birth weight preterm infants. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24: 1646–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Counsell, S, Allsop, J, Harrison, M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the brain in preterm infants with focal and diffuse white matter abnormality. Pediatrics 2003; 112: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sagar, P, Grant, PE. Diffusion-weighted imaging: pediatric clinical applications. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006; 16: 45–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mukherjee, P, McKinstry, R. Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of human brain development. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006; 16: 19–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knaap, M, Valk, J. Classification of congenital abnormalities of the CNS. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988; 9: 315–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Barkovich, AJ, Truwit, CL. Brain damage from perinatal asphyxia: correlation of MR findings with gestational age. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990; 11: 1087–96.Google ScholarPubMed
Aida, N, Nishimura, G, Hachiya, Y, et al. MR imaging of perinatal brain damage: comparison of clinical outcome with initial follow-up MR findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1992; 19: 1909–22.Google Scholar
Barkovich, A, Hallam, D. Neuroimaging in perinatal hypoxic–ischemic injury. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 1997; 3: 28–41.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, F, Rutherford, M, Groenendaal, F, et al. Origin and timing of brain lesions in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy. Lancet 2003; 361: 736–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, S, Ramaswamy, V, Michelson, D, et al. Patterns of brain injury in term neonatal encephalopathy. J Pediatr 2005; 146: 453–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lupton, BA, Hill, A, Roland, EH, et al. Brain swelling in the asphyxiated term newborn: pathogenesis and outcome. Pediatrics 1988; 82: 139–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Vannucci, RC, Christensen, MA, Jager, JY. Nature, time-course, and extent of cerebral edema in perinatal hypoxic–ischemic brain damage. Pediatr Neurol 1993; 9: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinto-Martin, JA, Riolo, S, Cnaan, A, et al. Cranial ultrasound prediction of disabling and nondisabling cerebral palsy at age two in a low birthweight population. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 249–54.Google Scholar
Goetz, MC, Gretebeck, RJ, Oh, KS, et al. Incidence, timing and follow-up of periventricular leukomalacia. Am J Perinatol 1995; 12: 325–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valkama, AM, Pääkkö, ELE, Vainionpää, LK, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging at term and neuromotor outcome in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 2000; 89: 348–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perlman, JM, Rollins, N. Surveillance protocol for the detection of intracranial abnormalities in premature neonates. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000; 154: 822–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volpe, JJ. Neurobiology of periventricular leukomalacia in the premature infant. Pediatr Res 2001; 50: 553–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panigrahy, A, Barnes, PD, Robertson, RL, et al. Volumetric brain differences in children with periventricular T2-signal hyperintensities: a grouping by gestational age at birth. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 695–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, SP, Hoque, NN, Piecuch, RE, et al. The spectrum of cerebellar hemorrhage in premature newborns. Pediatr Res 2003; 53: 537A (abst #3040).Google Scholar
Austin, NC, Woodward, L, Spencer, C, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at one year in a regional cohort of very low birth weight infants: correlation with MRI at term. Pediatr Res 2003; 53: 398A (abst #2253).Google Scholar
Volpe, JJ. Cerebral white matter injury of the premature infant: more common than you think. Pediatrics 2003; 112: 176–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inder, TE, Wells, SJ, Mogridge, NB, et al. Defining the nature of the cerebral abnormalities in the premature infant: a qualitative magnetic resonance imaging study. J Pediatr 2003; 143: 171–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panigrahy, A, Barnes, PD, Robertson, RL, et al. Quantitative analysis of the corpus callosum in children with cerebral palsy and developmental delay: correlation with cerebral white matter volume. Pediatr Radiol 2005; 35: 1199–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodensteiner, J, Johnsen, S. MRI findings in children surviving extremely premature delivery and extremely low birthweight with cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol 2006; 21: 743–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyet, L, Kennea, N, Counsell, S, et al. Natural history of brain lesions in extremely preterm infants studied with serial MRI from birth and neurodevelopmental assessmentPediatrics 2006; 118: 536–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khwaja, O, Volpe, J. Pathogenesis of cerebral white matter injury of prematurity. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008; 93: F153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkovich, AJ. MR and CT evaluation of profound neonatal and infantile asphyxia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1992; 13: 959–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Barkovich, AJ, Sargent, SK. Profound asphyxia in the premature infant: imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16: 1837–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Barkovich, AJ, Westmark, K, Partridge, C, et al. Perinatal asphyxia: MR findings in the first 10 days. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16: 427–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Roland, EH, Poskitt, K, et al. Perinatal hypoxic–ischemic thalamic injury: clinical features and neuroimaging. Ann Neurol 1998; 44: 161–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sargent, M, Poskitt, K, Roland, E, et al. Cerebellar vermian atrophy after neonatal hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 1008–15.Google ScholarPubMed
Boichot, C, Walker, P, Durand, C, et al. Term neonate prognosis after perinatal asphyxia: contributions of MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, relaxation times, and ADCs. Radiology 2006; 239: 839–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankaran, S, Laptook, A, Ehrenkranz, R, et al. Whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 1574–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulas, D, Glass, P. Neonatal ECMO: neuroimaging and neurodevelopmental outcome. Semin Perinatol 2005; 29: 58–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuerrer, M, Martin, E, Boltshauser, E. MRI of intracranial hemorrhage in neonates and infants at 2.35 tesla. Neuroradiology 1991; 33: 223–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVeber, G, Andrew, M, Adams, C, et al. Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in children. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 417–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvalho, K, Bodensteiner, J, Connolly, P, et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis in children. J Child Neurol 2001; 16: 574–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, J, Hirtz, D, deVeber, G, et al. Report of the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke Workshop on Perinatal and Childhood Stroke. Pediatrics 2002; 109: 116–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeVeber, G. Arterial ischemic strokes in infants and children: an overview of current approaches. Semin Thrombosis Hemostasis 2003; 29: 567–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Sebire, G, Tabarki, B, Saunders, , et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis in children: risk factors, presentation, diagnosis, and outcome. Brain 2005; 128: 477–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, A, deVeber, G. Cerebral palsy secondary to perinatal ischemic stroke. Clin Perinatol 2006; 33: 367–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzgerald, K, Williams, LS, Garg, BP, et al. Cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in the neonate. Arch Neurol 2006; 63: 405–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, C, deVeber, G. Prothrombotic abnormalities in childhood ischaemic stroke. Thromb Res 2006; 118: 67–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehtisham, A, Stern, B. Cerebral venous thrombosis: a review. Neurologist 2006; 12: 32–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, A, Robertson, R. Spontaneous superficial parenchymal and leptomeningeal hemorrhage in term neonates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25: 469–75.Google ScholarPubMed
Govaert, P, Vanhaesebrouck, P, Praeter, C. Traumatic neonatal intracranial bleeding and stroke. Arch Dis Child 1992; 67: 840–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castillo, M, Fordham, . MR of neurologically symptomatic newborns after vacuum extraction delivery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16: 816–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Odita, JC, Hebi, S. CT and MRI characteristics of intracranial hemorrhage complicating breech and vacuum delivery. Pediatr Radiol 1996; 26: 782–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleinman, PK, Barnes, PD. Head trauma. In Kleinman, PK, ed., Imaging of Child Abuse, 2nd edn. St Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book, 1998.Google Scholar
Alexander, J, Leveno, K, Hauth, J, et al. Fetal injury associated with cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 885–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doumouchtsis, S, Arulkumaran, S. Head trauma after instrumental births. Clin Perinatol 2008; 35: 69–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teixeira, J, Zimmerman, R, Haselgrove, J, et al. Diffusion imaging in pediatric central nervous system infections. Neuroradiology 2001; 43: 1031–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jan, W, Zimmerman, R, Bilaniuk, L, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in acute bacterial meningitis in infancy. Neuroradiology 2003; 45: 634–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeVries, L, Verboon-Maciolek, M, Cowan, F, et al. The role of cranial US and MRI in the diagnosis of infections of the central nervous system. Early Hum Dev 2006; 82: 819–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoon, AH. Neuroimaging in cerebral palsy: patterns of brain dysgenesis and injury. J Child Neurol 2005; 12: 936–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, D, Young Poussaint, T. Neuroimaging of the child with developmental delay. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 18: 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valk, J, Knapp, MS. Toxic encephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1992; 13: 747–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Knaap, MS, Valk, J. Magnetic Resonance of Myelination & Myelin Disorders, 3rd edn. New York, NY: Springer, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, P, Horska, A. Neuroimaging in leukodystrophies. J Child Neurol 2004; 19: 559–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanderver, A. Tools for diagnosis of leukodystrophies and other disorders presenting with white matter disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2005; 5: 110–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murakami, Y, Yamashita, Y, Matsuishi, T, et al. Cranial MRI of neurologically impaired children suffering from neonatal hypoglycemia. Pediatr Radiol 1999; 29: 23–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alkalay, A, Flores-Sarnat, L, Sarnat, H, et al. Brain imaging findings in neonatal hypoglycemia. Clin Pediatr 2005; 44: 783–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkovich, A, Ali, F, Rowley, H, et al. Imaging patterns of neonatal hypoglycemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998; 19: 523–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Govaert, P, Lequin, M, Swarte, R, et al. Changes in globus pallidus with (pre) term kernicterus. Pediatrics 2003; 112: 1256–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dublin, A, Hald, J, Wootton-Gorges, S. Isolated sulfite oxidase deficiency: MR imaging features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 484–5.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×