Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T13:14:33.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - UN territorial administration and the tradition of peace-maintenance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

Carsten Stahn
Affiliation:
University of Wales, Swansea
Get access

Summary

The practice of peace-maintenance shaped the contemporary profile of international territorial administration. The demise of colonialism and the creation of the UN and other international organisations after World War II instituted a certain faith in multilateralist approaches towards peacemaking. International organisations were more regularly entrusted with tasks formerly exercised by states. The UN came to exercise functions of territorial administration under the umbrella of peacemaintenance. International administration became one of the components Of “multi-dimensional” UN peacekeeping. This practice removed engagements in territorial administration partly from their historical realist tradition as post-war devices of power alliances.

Peacekeeping and international territorial administration

The UN Charter does not make express provision for peacekeeping activities by the UN. The practice of the organisation was born out of pragmatism. The start of peacekeeping under the Charter dates back to 1948-9 when the UN deployed military personnel to monitor ceasefires between Israel and its neighbours and between India and Pakistan. Seven years later, on 4 November 1956, the UN General Assembly requested Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjold to send a UN Emergency Force (UNEF) to the Sinai, in order to secure and supervise a ceasefire between Egypt and Israel. This mission was followed by a series of other operations in which observer groups or military forces were deployed by the UN with the consent of the host state in order to monitor ceasefires or prevent hostilities among warring parties. These operations were embedded in the tradition of neutrality. The UN was involved because it was viewed as an impartial actor that could serve as a neutral buffer between competing parties to a conflict.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Law and Practice of International Territorial Administration
Versailles to Iraq and Beyond
, pp. 147 - 154
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×