Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T21:38:40.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion: a transformation of natural philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2009

Sachiko Kusukawa
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Cambridge
Get access

Summary

One last word. Wanting to make the sixteenth century a skeptical century, a free-thinking and rationalist one, and glorify it as such is the worst of errors and delusions. On the authority of its best representatives it was, quite to the contrary, an inspired century, one that sought in all things first of all a reflection of the divine.

Lucien Febvre, The Problem of Unbelief in the Sixteenth Century: The Religion of Rabelais, trans, by Beatrice Gottlieb

Philip Melanchthon transformed the natural philosophy which was traditionally taught by the Schoolmen at universities into a Lutheran one. The late medieval Schoolmen frequently commented upon Aristotle's books on nature with the quaestio method and appealed to the authority of Aristotle, the Schoolmen and the Church. As part of university learning, natural philosophy contributed towards knowledge of God and alongside metaphysics it was an essential area of knowledge for theologians. The system of thought of the Schoolmen, tightly knit together by means of logic, was ultimately based on a conviction that rational knowledge about God was possible and necessary. Hence natural philosophical arguments were legitimately used to prove, elucidate and maintain theological points.

In contrast, Luther denied the validity of human rational knowledge as a support for theology. Human reason on its own could not affirm theological truths. Natural philosophy of the late medieval Schoolmen was therefore rejected by Luther and Melanchthon – it could not teach the message of the Gospel. Instead, Melanchthon's natural philosophy was knowledge of Law in the sense that it provided the theoretical foundation of his moral philosophy of civil obedience.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Transformation of Natural Philosophy
The Case of Philip Melanchthon
, pp. 201 - 210
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×