Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T10:39:08.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2009

Samuel Merrill, III
Affiliation:
Wilkes University, Pennsylvania
Bernard Grofman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access

Summary

… how should a rational voter calculate the expected utility incomes from which he derives his expected party differential?

Anthony Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy (1957: 39)

How Do Voters Decide?

Imagine that you, a voter, must choose between two or more candidates for elective office. How will you decide for whom to vote? Political scientists and others have studied this question from both theoretical and descriptive perspectives. Roughly speaking they have offered what we might think of as three basic types of answers:

Answer one is that you will tend to vote for the candidate whose political party you have come to identify with. In classic works such as The American Voter (Campbell, Converse, Miller, and Stokes, 1960), scholars at the University of Michigan and elsewhere have developed this idea into what is often called the Michigan model of party identification. While not everyone will simply vote their party ID, party ID is seen as the best single advance predictor of the vote, with changing circumstances (such as economic conditions) giving rise to short-run and longer-run electoral forces that favor one candidate/party or another and that lead voters to deviate from their historical party identifications.

Answer two is that you will tend to vote for the candidate whose policy views are closest to your own. Following Anthony Downs (l957), we may think of both voters and candidates as points in some n-dimensional issue or policy space.

Type
Chapter
Information
A Unified Theory of Voting
Directional and Proximity Spatial Models
, pp. 1 - 16
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction
  • Samuel Merrill, III, Wilkes University, Pennsylvania, Bernard Grofman, University of California, Irvine
  • Book: A Unified Theory of Voting
  • Online publication: 04 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605864.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction
  • Samuel Merrill, III, Wilkes University, Pennsylvania, Bernard Grofman, University of California, Irvine
  • Book: A Unified Theory of Voting
  • Online publication: 04 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605864.001
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction
  • Samuel Merrill, III, Wilkes University, Pennsylvania, Bernard Grofman, University of California, Irvine
  • Book: A Unified Theory of Voting
  • Online publication: 04 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605864.001
Available formats
×