Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T10:31:48.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Global Political Communication: Good Governance, Human Development, and Mass Communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2009

Pippa Norris
Affiliation:
McGuire Lecturer in Comparative Politics, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
Frank Esser
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, Columbia
Barbara Pfetsch
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Get access

Summary

The growth in electoral democracies presents many potential opportunities for human development. The last quarter of the twentieth century witnessed a dramatic expansion in political rights and civil liberties worldwide. Since the start of the “third wave” of democratization, in 1974, the proportion of states that are electoral democracies has more than doubled, and the number of democratic governments in the world has tripled (Diamond 2001). Countries as diverse as the Czech Republic, Mexico, and South Africa have experienced a radical transformation of their political systems through the establishment of more effective party competition, free and fair elections, and a more independent and pluralistic press. Many hoped that these developments would expand the voice of the disadvantaged and the accountability of governments, so that policy makers would become more responsive to human needs, and governments could be removed from power through the ballot box if citizens became dissatisfied by their performance.

Yet in practice, after the initial surge in the early 1990s, many electoral democracies in Latin America, Central Europe, and Sub-Saharan Africa remain fragile and only poorly consolidated, often divided by ethnic conflict and plagued by a faltering economic performance, with excessive executive power in the hands of one predominant party and a fragmented opposition (Linz and Stephan 1996). The central danger, illustrated by the nations of the Andean region, lies in disillusionment with democracy, and even occasional reversals (Norris 1999; Pharr and Putnam 2000; Lagos 2001; Plattner and Diamond 2001).

Type
Chapter
Information
Comparing Political Communication
Theories, Cases, and Challenges
, pp. 115 - 150
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACE Project. Available from the World Wide Web at http://www.aceproject.org/main/ english/me/mea01b.htm
Almond, Gabriel A., and G. Bingham Powell, Jr. 1992. Comparative Politics Today: A World View. New York: Harper Collins Publishers
Asante, Clement E. 1997. Press Freedom and Development: A Research Guide and Selected Bibliography. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press
Bagdikian, Ben. 1997. The Media Monopoly. Boston: Beacon Press
Besley, T., and Burgess, R.. 2001. Political Agency, Government Responsiveness and the Role of the Media. European Economic Review 45 (4–6): 629–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogart, Leo. 1995. Commercial Culture. The Media System and the Public Interest. New York: Transaction
Dahlgren, Peter. 1995. Television and the Public Sphere. London: Sage
Dahlgren, Peter, and Colin Sparks. 1995. Communication and Citizenship. London: Routledge
Diamond, Larry. 2001. Consolidating Democracies. In Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi, and Pippa Norris, eds. Comparing Democracies 2: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. London: Sage
Djankov, Simeon, Caralee McLiesh, Tatiana Nenova, and Andrei Shleifer. 2001. Who Owns the Media? Paper presented at the World Bank meeting “The Role of the Media in Development.”
Donohue, George A., and Philip, Tichenor. 1995. A Guard Dog Perspective on the Role of the Media. Journal of Communication 45 (2): 115–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. 2000. Freedom in the World 2000–2001 (online). Available from World Wide Web at http://www.freedomhouse.org
Gunter, Richard, and Anthony Mughan. 2000. Democracy and the Media: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press
Hachten, W. A. 1989. Media Development without Press Freedom – Lee Kuan Yew's Singapore. Journalism Quarterly 66 (4): 822–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch. Available from the World Wide Web at http://www.hrw.org/
Huntington, Samuel. 1993. The Third Wave. Norman: The University of Oklahoma Press
Hur, K. Kyloon. 1984. A Critical Analysis of International News Flow Research. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1: 365–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Index on Censorship. Available from the World Wide Web at http://www.indexoncensorship.org
Inglehart, Louis Edward. 1998. Press and Speech Freedoms in the World, from Antiquity until 1998: A Chronology. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press
International Federation of Journalists. Available from the World Wide Web at http://www.ifj.org
International Press Institute. Available from the World Wide Web at http://www.freemedia.at
Kalathil, Shanthi, and Taylor C. Boas. 2001. The Internet and State Control in Authoritarian Regimes: China, Cuba and the Counterrevolution. Global Policy Program No 21. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Kaufman, Daniel, Aaart Kraay, and Pablo Zoido-Lobaton. 1999. Governance Matters. World Bank Policy Research Paper 2196. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available from the World Wide Web at www.worldbank.org
Köcher, Renate. 1986. Bloodhounds or Missionaries: Role Definitions of German and British Journalists. European Journal of Communication 1: 43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagos, Marta. 2001. Between Stability and Crisis in Latin America. Journal of Democracy 12 (1): 137–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Daniel. 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press
Linz, Juan, and Alfred Stephan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins Press
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. Some Social Prerequisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53: 69–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin 1990. Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of Canada and the United States. New York: Routledge
Lipset, Seymour Martin 1996. American Exceptionalism: A Double Edged Sword. New York: W. W. Norton
Lupia, Arthur, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
McChesney, Robert. 1999. Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
McCrone, Donald J., and Charles, F. Cnudde. 1967. Toward a Communication Theory of Democratic Political Development: A Causal Model. American Political Science Review 61 (1): 72–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuail, Denis. 2000. Mass Communication Theory. London: Sage
Mowlana, Hamid. 1985. International Flow of Information: A Global Report and Analysis. Paris: UNESCO.
Norris, Pippa, ed. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Norris, Pippa 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post-Industrial Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press
Norris, Pippa 2001. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press
Norris, Pippa 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Political Activism Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
OSCE. Report by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe on the October 2000 Parliamentary Elections in Belarus (online). Available from World Wide Web at http://www.osce.org/odihr/documents/reports/election_reports/by/bel200fin.pdf
Østergaard, Bernt Stubbe, ed. 1992. The Media in Western Europe. London: Sage
Pharr, Susan, and Robert Putnam, eds. 2000. Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Princeton: Princeton University Press
Picard, Robert G. 1988. Press Concentration and Monopoly: New Perspectives on Newspaper Ownership and Operation. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp
Plattner, Marc, and Larry, Diamond. 2001. High Anxiety in the Andes. Journal of Democracy 12 (2): 59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, William, Edwards S. Herman, and Herbert I. Schiller. 1989. Hope and Folly: The United States and UNESCO 1945–1985. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Przeworski, Adam, and Henry Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience
Pye, Lucian W. 1963. Communications and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Rodan, Garry. 1998. Asia and the International Press: The Political Significance of Expanding Markets. Democratization 5: 125–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Tabernero, Alfonso. 1993. Media Concentration in Europe: Commercial Enterprises and the Public Interest. London: John Libbey
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books
Shah, H. 1996. Modernization, Marginalization and Emancipation: Toward a Normative Model of Journalism and National Development. Communication Theory 6 (2): 143–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebert, Fred S., Theodore Peterson, and Wilbur Schramm. 1984. Four Theories of the Press. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
Smith, Anthony. 1991. The Age of Behemoths: The Globalization of Mass Media Firms. New York: Priority Press
Sreberny-Mohammadi, Annabelle et al. 1984. Foreign News in the Media: International Reporting in Twenty-Nine Countries. Reports and Papers on Mass Communication 93. Paris: UNESCO.
Stevenson, Robert L., and Donald Lewis Shaw, eds. 1984. Foreign News and the New World Information Order. Ames: Iowa State University Press
Sussman, Leonard R. 2000. Censor Dot Gov: The Internet and Press Freedom. In Freedom House, ed. Press Freedom Survey 2000. Washington DC: Freedom House. Available from the World Wide Web at http://www.freedomhouse.com
Sussman, Leonard R. 2001. Press Freedom in Our Genes. Reston, VA: World Press Freedom Committee
Swanson, David L., and Paolo Mancini, eds. 1996. Politics, Media and Modern Democracy. Westport, CT: Praeger
Tunstall, Jeremy, and Michael Palmer. 1991. Media Moguls. London: Routledge
Wolfenson, James D. 1999. Voices of the Poor. Washington Post, November 10, 1999, p. A39Google Scholar
World Press Freedom Council. Available from the World Wide Web at http://www.wpfc.org

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×