Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T17:38:15.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Spatial pattern and process in urban animal communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2010

Mark J. McDonnell
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Gardens, Melbourne and University of Melbourne
Amy K. Hahs
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Gardens, Melbourne and University of Melbourne
Jürgen H. Breuste
Affiliation:
Universität Salzburg
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Urbanisation provides an environmental gradient from a highly developed core to a rural or natural area (Numata,1976; McDonnell and Pickett, 1990). Urban–rural gradients provide a useful laboratory in which to examine environmental effects on communities. Analysing changes in a biological community along such a gradient provides a scientific basis for planning ecological cities, but also makes it easier to test hypotheses through management of urban landscapes.

Urban ecosystem studies in Japan started in 1971 as a part of a project on ‘human survival and environment’ (Numata, 1976). Numata defined an urban ecosystem as one consisting of man-modified and man-made ecosystems, and he proposed three approaches to urban ecosystems: (1) examining the flow of energy, matter, people and information; (2) studying the impact of an urban environment on terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems; and (3) studying reactions to the abiotic environment (in the Clementian sense). He and his colleagues reported a series of urban ecological studies of metropolitan Tokyo (see Numata, 1982).

Although urban ecological study in Japan covers many fields, such as pollution of air and water, urban climates and the water cycle, one important subject is the impact of urbanisation on flora, fauna and the biological community. Early studies focused on biological indicators of urbanisation; lichen (Taoda, 1973), alien plants (Hotta, 1977), soil arthropods (Aoki, 1979), and the retreat of wild animals (Chiba, 1973) were used as indicators. Through comprehensive study of urban ecology, Numata (1987) identified the importance of landscape ecology in urban ecosystem studies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecology of Cities and Towns
A Comparative Approach
, pp. 197 - 214
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×