Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T16:00:08.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Euro-litigation: collective judicial enforcement of European labour law

from Section II - The structure of European labour law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Brian Bercusson
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The use of judicial procedures by collective actors in order to obtain redress for grievances is a form of citizen involvement. Public interest litigation is one of a wide range of mechanisms whereby interest groups may seek to become involved as a means of promoting their interests. The use of EU law in a litigation strategy by particular collective interest groups is a means of enforcement of EU law going beyond the tactics of identifying new categories of plaintiff or defendant, or criticising the adequacy of domestic remedies. It has strategic potential in the form of what has come to be known as ‘Euro-litigation’.

Judicial enforcement of European labour law through legal actions brought by collective organisations of workers and employers is a form of public interest litigation. However, public interest litigation in the field of employment and industrial relations may be expected to differ from that involving agricultural policy, public procurement, trade practices, anti-dumping, state aids and competition law. Similarly, it is important to distinguish among the very different substantive areas often subsumed under the heading of ‘social policy’, which can include, inter alia, various aspects ranging from citizenship rights, the environment, consumer protection, social security and social protection, as well as employment and labour relations.

EU law is mostly used in two ways. First, as a source of substantive rules. Secondly, to provide remedies against the state or just better remedies. But EU law can also be used in a litigation strategy by powerful collective actors.

Type
Chapter
Information
European Labour Law , pp. 496 - 518
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bercusson, B., ‘Public Interest Litigation in Social Policy’, in Micklitz, H.-W. and Reich, N. (eds.), Public Interest Litigation before European Courts, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1996, pp. 261–95Google Scholar
Craig, P. P. and Búrca, G., EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials, Oxford: Clarendon, 1995, ‘Conclusion’ to Chapter 11 ‘Review of Legality’, pp. 446–510 at p. 509Google Scholar
Rawlings, R., ‘The Eurolaw Game: Some Deductions from a Saga’, (1993) 20 Journal of Law and Society309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘Collective Agreements in the Hierarchy of European Community Sources’, in Davies, P., Lyon-Caen, A., Sciarra, S. and Simitis, S. (eds.), European Community Labour Law: Principles and Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, p. 189 at pp. 202 and 204
‘Accountability of Interest Groups in the Union Lawmaking Process’, Chapter 18 in Craig, P. and Harlow, C. (eds.), Lawmaking in the European Union, London: Kluwer, 1998, p. 354Google Scholar
Bercusson, B., ‘The Full Monti: Stripping Away Strikers’ Rights', in Thompsons Labour and European Law Review, Issue 20, March 1998, pp. 4–5Google Scholar
Anderson, David W. K. and Demetriou, Marie, References to the European Court, 2nd edn, London: Sweet & Maxwell Litigation Library, 2002, pp. 237–9Google Scholar
Lasok, K. P. E., The European Court of Justice: Practice and Procedure, 2nd edn, London: LexisNexis, 1994, p. 153Google Scholar
Harlow, C., ‘Towards a Theory of Access for the European Court of Justice’, (1992) 12 Yearbook of European Law 213 at p. 246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercusson, B., ‘Fundamental Social and Economic Rights in the European Community’, in Cassese, A., Clapham, A. and Weiler, J. (eds.), Human Rights in the European Community: Methods of Protection, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, 1991, p. 195, at p. 286Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×