Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T11:50:25.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - “I've picked some up from a colleague”: language, sharing and communities of practice in an institutional setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2009

Frances Rock
Affiliation:
Lecturer in English Language and Linguistics, University of Surrey Roehampton
David Barton
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Karin Tusting
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines interfaces between the notion of community of practice and the sociolinguistic study of a workplace. The workers are all police officers, and the chapter focuses on one tiny aspect of their working lives: the statement and explanation of the right to silence to people under arrest. This focus makes it possible to see how a routine, pervasive work task permeates and becomes permeated by communities of practice. By focussing on one discrete activity which is common to a large organisation, and performed through talk, I am also able to demonstrate how close study of language data can be informed by the community of practice framework and can, in turn, enrich the framework.

INTRODUCTION

Community of practice is an elusive term. Clearly, the term involves communities – collectives of people – and practices – frameworks of doing. However, those who articulate each concept, typically in oppositional terms, illustrate how far beyond these notions the concept goes. Community, here, does not denote socially recognised categories (Wenger 1998a) or relationships; rather, these communities are “ ‘about’ something” (Wenger 1998b:4). This makes the concept useful for sociolinguists, who propose that language serves such ‘about-ness’ or social engagement, “not the place and not the people as a collection of individuals” (Eckert and McConnell-Ginet 1998:490). Practice too conveys more than shared “behaviours” (Meyerhoff 1999:226) or shared ways of “doing things” through talk, convictions or norms (Eckert and McConnell-Ginet 1998:490).

Type
Chapter
Information
Beyond Communities of Practice
Language Power and Social Context
, pp. 77 - 104
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, D., U. Nulden and C. Sørensen (2002) e-policing on SafeStreet, Workshop Presentation at IRIS25 (Information Systems Research in Scandinavia), August 10–13, 2002, Bautahøj, Denmark. [On-line] Available at: http://www.iris25.cbs.dk/panelsandworkshops/epolicing.pdf
Andrew, I. (2002) Networking and Communities of Practice. [On-line] Available at: http://www.reframingthefuture.net/Action_Plans/2002/files/cp247.html. Accessed June 20, 2003
Atherton, J. (2002) Learning and Teaching: Situated Learning. [On-line] Available at: http://www.dmu.ac.uk/%7Ejamesa/learning/situated.htm. Accessed June 20, 2003
Austin, J. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Barton, D. and Hamilton, M. (1998) Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community. London: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, G. (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: BallantineGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. ‘Richard Nice’ tr. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1978) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M. (1999) “Why be normal?”: language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28 (2) 203–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Certeau, M. (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Cotterill, J. (2000) Reading the rights: a cautionary tale of comprehension and comprehensibility. Forensic Linguistics 7 (1) 4–25Google Scholar
Crawford, M. (1995) Talking Difference: On Gender and Language. London: SageGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. and S. McConnell-Ginet (1998) Communities of practice: where language, gender and power all live. In Coates, J. (ed), Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 484–494Google Scholar
Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (1999) New generalisations and explanations in language and gender research. Language in Society 28 (2) 185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, S. (1999) Communities of practice, gender and the representation of sexual assault. Language in Society 28 (2) 239–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eijkman, H. (2002) Reframing the first year experience: the critical role of ‘recognition work’ in achieving curricular justice. Paper presented at The 6th Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference 2002: Changing Agendas – Te Ao Hurihuri, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 8–10th July 2002
Fenner, S., Gudjonsson, G. and Clare, I. (2002) Understanding of the current police caution (England and Wales) among suspects in police detention. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 12 83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. (1990) Background to the “new literacy studies”. In Gee, J. (ed), Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourse. London: The Falmer PressGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. (1996) Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourse. (Second edition). London: The Falmer PressGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. (1999) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: DoubledayGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis. New York: Harper ColophonGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. and M. Goodwin (1997) Contested vision: the discursive construction of Rodney King. In Gunnarsson, B., Linell, P. and Nordberg, B. (eds), The Construction of Professional Discourse. London: Longman, 292–316Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, G. and Clare, I. (1994) The proposed new police caution (England and Wales): how easy is it to understand?Expert Evidence 3 (3) 109–112Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1971) Language in Social Groups. Stanford: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hall, K. and Bucholtz, M. (eds) (1995) Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. (1999) The community of practice: theories and methodologies in language and gender research. Language in Society 28 (2) 173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Home Office (2003) Police and Criminal Evidence Act, Codes of Practice, Code C. London: HMSO
Jaworski, A. (1993) The Power of Silence: Social and Pragmatic Perspectives. London: Sage PublicationsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, P. (1994) Dialects Converging: Rural Speech in Urban Norway. Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Kurzon, D. (1995) The right of silence: a socio-pragmatic model of interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 23 (1) 55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzon, D. (1996) To speak or not to speak. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 9 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laat, M. (2001) Learning in a community of practice: creating and managing knowledge through networked expertise. Paper presented at the 2nd World Conference on Organized Crime, Modern Criminal Investigation and Human Rights, Durban, 3–7th December, 2001
Laat, M. and W. Broer (2004) CoPs for cops: managing and creating knowledge through networked expertise. In Hildreth, P. and Kimble, C. (eds), Knowledge Networks: Innovation through Communities of Practice. London: Idea Group PublishingCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972) Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philidelphia: University of Pennsylvania PressGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linell, P. (1998) Discourse across boundaries: on recontextualisation and the blending of voices in professional discourse. Text 18 (2) 143–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElhinny, B. (1998) I don't smile much anymore: affect, gender and the discourse of Pittsburgh police officers. In Coates, J. (ed), Language and Gender: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 309–327Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, M. (1999) Sorry in the pacific: defining communities, defining practices. Language in Society 28 (2) 225–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, L. (1987) Observing and Analysing Natural Language. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
New Oxford Dictionary of English, The (1999) Oxford: Oxford University Press
Norrick, N. (1994) Repetition as a conversational joking strategy. In Johnstone, B. (ed), Repetition in Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 2. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 15–29Google Scholar
Ostermann, A. C. (2003) Communities of practice at work: gender, facework and the power of habitus at an all-female police station and a feminist crisis intervention centre in Brazil. Discourse and Society 14 (4) 473–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, D. (1989) Perceptual Dialectology: Non-Linguists' Views of Areal Linguistics. Dordrecht: ForisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, S. (2000) “Let me put it simply”: the case for a standard translation of the police caution and its explanation. Forensic Linguistics 7 (1) 26–48Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. (1985) The place of silence in an integrated theory of communication. In Tannen, D. and Saville-Troike, M. (eds), Perspectives on Silence. NJ: Ablex Publishing CorporationGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. (1998) Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction: A Study of News Discourse. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. (2001) Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. London: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. (1979) Linguistic Convergence: An Ethnography of Speaking at Fort Chipewyan, Alberta. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. (1981) Narrative, Literacy and Face in Interethnic Communication. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing CorporationGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuy, R. (1997) Ten unanswered language questions about Miranda. Forensic Linguistics 4 (2) 175–195Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Swales, J. (1998) Other Floors, Other Voices: A Textography of a Small University Building. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1978) Interindividual behaviour and intergroup behaviour. In Tajfel, H. (ed), Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London and New York: Academic Press, 27–60Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In Austin, W. and Worchel, S. (eds), Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson Hall, 7–24Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (ed) (1993) Framing in Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998a) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998b) Communities of practice: learning as a social system. Systems Thinker 9 (5) 2–3 (June/July 1998)Google Scholar
Winter, E. (1979) Replacement as a fundamental function of the sentence in context. Forum Linguisticum 4 (2) 95–188Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×