Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T02:56:06.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The Film Exhibition Business: Critical Issues, Practice, and Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

Jehoshua Eliashberg
Affiliation:
Professor of Marketing and Professor of Operations and Information Management, Wharton School of Business
Charles C. Moul
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

The supply chain for movies released for theatrical exhibition consists of the distributor, exhibitor, and the audience, as shown in Figure 5.1. The audience has opportunities to watch movies in a number of distribution outlets: domestic theaters, foreign theaters, home video, and cable and network TV, where the time lags between the releases of the movies in successive outlets differ but are typically measured in months (Figure 5.2). Despite the availability of these multiple release windows, the theatrical performance of films in the United States has been considered by practitioners to be a critical success driver: “Theatrical exhibition is the major factor in persuading the public what they want to see, even if that public never sets foot inside a motion picture theater. And how well and how long a picture plays in theaters has everything to do with its value in other markets” (Daniels, Leedy, and Sills 1998, p. 34). The main reasons as to why the theatrical experience is believed to have such a significant impact on the performance of the movie in its other distribution channels are the buzz created by the studios prior to and during the theatrical release dates, generated through high advertising spending, and the attention given by the media to box-office performance and figures. It is interesting to note that the recent phenomenon characterized as “TV screens get larger and movie theater screens get smaller” has, to date, not had a significant negative impact on the moviegoers' behavior.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Battaglio, Stephen, and Kirk Honeycutt. 1998. “Bronfman: Event Films Need Event Ticket Prices,” Hollywood Reporter, April 1
Brasell, R. Bruce. 1999. “Movie Exhibition Monopoly in Mobile No More: Diversity in Films Screened Promised,” The Harbinger (Mobile, Alabama), February 23
British Film Institute. “UK Box Office Breakdown 1995–2002.” (Accessed from http:www.bfi.org.uk/facts/stats/index.html on 8/19/04.)
Caves, Richard E. 2000. Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, Darlene C. 1997. “Profit-Sharing Versus Fixed-Payment Contracts: Evidence from the Motion Picture Industry,” Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 13(1): 169–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Credit Suisse First Boston. 2002. “Digital Cinema: Episode II,” Sector Review: Americas/United States Imaging Technology, June 4. (Accessed from http://www.sabucat.com/digital.pdf on 3/28/04.)
Daniels, Bill, Leedy, David, and Sills, Steven D.. 1998. Movie Money: Understanding Hollywood's (Creative) Accounting Practices, Los Angeles, CA: Silman-James PressGoogle Scholar
Davis, Peter. 2001. “Spatial Competition in Retail Markets: Movie Theaters,” unpublished manuscript, Economics Department, London School of Economics, December
Davis, Peter 2003a. “The Effect of Local Competition on Retail Prices: The U.S. Motion Picture Exhibition Market,” unpublished manuscript, Economics Department, London School of Economics, September
Davis, Peter. 2003b. “Fine Young Cannibals in the U.S. Motion Picture Exhibition Market,” unpublished manuscript, Economics Department, London School of Economics, October
Diorio, Carl. 2003. “Regal Pumped for Hoyts' Haul,” Variety, February 4
Doyle, Barry. (1998). “Return of the Super Cinema (United Kingdom),” History Today, 48, February 1, pp. 2–4
EAO (European Audiovisual Observatory). 2002. Focus 2002: World Market Film Trends. (Accessed from http://www.obs.coe.int/oea_publ/market/focus.html on 3/28/04.)
Einav, Liran, and Barak Y. Orbach. 2001. “Uniform Prices for Differentiated Goods: The Case of the Movie-Theater Industry,” Harvard Olin Discussion Paper No. 337, October
Elberse, Anita, and Eliashberg, Jehoshua. 2003. “Demand and Supply for Sequentially Released Products in International Markets: The Case of Motion Pictures,” Marketing Science, 22(3): 329–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliashberg, Jehoshua, Swami, Sanjeev, Weinberg, Charles B., and Wierenga, Berend. 2001. “Implementing and Evaluating silverscreener: A Marketing Management Support System for Movie Exhibitors,” Interfaces, 31(3), Part 2 of 2, May–June, pp. S108–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliashberg, Jehoshua, Jonker, Jedid-Jah, Sawhney, Mohanbir S., and Wierenga, Berend. 2000. “moviemod: An Implementable Decision Support System for Pre-Release Market Evaluation of Motion Pictures,” Marketing Science, 19(3): 226–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliashberg, Jehoshua, Steven J. Miller, Sanjeev Swami, Charles B. Weinberg, and Berend Wierenga. 2003. “Marketing Models for Movie Managers: Model Development and Implementation Experience,” Marketing Science Conference, University of Maryland, June
Eller, Claudia. 2002. “Showtime for Theater Owners: More Americans Went to Movies This Year than Anytime since 1959,” Los Angeles Times, December 26
Emmons, Natasha. 2001. “Game Works Enters Movie Theater Biz,” Amusement Business, May 28
Hanssen, Andrew F. 2002. “The Block-Booking of Films: A Re-Examination,” Journal of Law and Economic, 43 (October): 395–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiltbrand, David. 2003. “TV Ads Play on the Big Screen,” Philadelphia Inquirer, February 2
Husted, Bryan W. 2000. “The Impact of National Culture on Software Piracy,” Journal of Business Ethics, 26: 197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. Morgan, and Ritz, Christopher J.. 1991. “Incorporating Distribution into New Product Diffusion Models,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8 (June): 91–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leenders, Mark A.A.M. and Jehoshua Eliashberg. 2004. “Antecedents and Consequences of Third-Party Products Evaluation Systems: Lessons from the International Motion Picture Industry,” unpublished manuscript, Marketing Department, University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business
Media Force. 2001. “Ten Top Pirated Movies in August [2001],” September 24. (Accessed from http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/2347.cfm on 3/28/04.)
Motion Picture Association of America website: http://www.mpaa.org
Sawhney, Mohanbir S., and Eliashberg, Jehoshua. 1996. “A Parsimonious Model for Forecasting Gross Box-Office Revenues of Motion Pictures,” Marketing Science, 15(2): 113–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Screen Digest. 2001. “Report on the Implications of Digital Technology for the Film Industry,” UK, Department for Culture. Media and Sport, Creative Industries Division
Screen Digest Report. 2002. “On the Implications of Digital Technology for the Film Industry,” September. (Accessed from http://www.culture.gov.uk/PDF/Screen_Digest_Report.pdf on 3/28/04.)
Stigler, George. 1968. “A Note on Block-Booking,” The Organization of Industry, Irwin Publishing Co.
Swami, Sanjeev, Eliashberg, Jehoshua, and Weinberg, Charles B.. 1999. “silverscreener: A Modeling Approach to Movie Screens Management,” Marketing Science, 18(3): 352–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swami, Sanjeev, Puterman, Martin L., and Weinberg, Charles B.. 2001. “Play It Again, Sam? Optimal Replacement Policies for Motion Picture Retailing,” Manufacturing and Services Operations Management, 3(4): 369–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towira, Pimpaka. 2000. “Saturday Night at the Movies,” The Nation (Thailand), July 18
Valenti, Jack. 2001. “Valenti Warns of Potentially Devastating Economic Impact of Copyright Theft,” MPAA press release, April 3. (Accessed from http://www.mpaa.org/jack/2001/2001_04_03a.htm on 3/28/04.)
Vogel, Harold L. 2001. Entertainment Industry Economics: A Guide for Financial Analysis, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne C., and Sanders, G. Lawrence. 2001. “Considerations in Ethical Decision-Making and Software Piracy,” Journal of Business Ethics, 29: 161–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, Mark. 1998. “Profit-Sharing Contracts in Hollywood: Evolution and Analysis,” Journal of Legal Studies, January: 67–112

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×