Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T21:36:25.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2010

Roger D. Blair
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Thomas F. Cotter
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Intellectual Property
Economic and Legal Dimensions of Rights and Remedies
, pp. 267 - 284
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A. L. Smith Iron Co. v. Dickson, 141 F.2d 3 (2d Cir. 1944)
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001)
Abbott Lab. v. Diamedix Corp., 47 F.3d 1128 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
Advanced Display Systems, Inc. v. Kent State Univ., 212 F.3d 1272 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
Aeroquip Corp. v. United States, 37 Fed. Cl. 139 (1997)
Althin CD Med., Inc. v. West Suburban Kidney Ctr., S.C., 874 F. Supp. 837 (N.D. Ill. 1994)
American Medical Sys., Inc. v. Medical Engineering Corp., 6 F.3d 1523 (Fed. Cir. 1993)
Amsted Indus., Inc. v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co., 24 F.3d 178 (Fed. Cir. 1994)
Apple Computer, Inc. v. Articulate Systems, Inc., 234 F.3d 14 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
Arachnid, Inc. v. Merit Indus., Inc., 939 F.2d 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co. (Aro II), 377 U.S. 476, (1964)
Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co., 440 U.S. 257 (1979)
Association of Coop. Members, Inc. v. Farmland Indus., Inc., 684 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir. 1982)
Atlantic Thermoplastics Co. v. Faytex Corp., 970 F.2d 834 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
Augustine Med., Inc. v. Gaymar Indus., 181 F.3d 1291 (Fed. Cir. 1999)
Avery Dennison Corp. v. Sumpton, 189 F.3d 868 (9th Cir. 1999)
Berry v. Sugar Notch Borough, 43 A. 240 (1899)
BIC Leisure Prods. v. Windsurfing Int'l, Inc., 1 F.3d 1214 (Fed. Cir. 1993)
Birdsell v. Shaliol, 112 U.S. 485 (1884)
Blonder-Tongue Lab., Inc. v. University of Ill. Found., 402 U.S. 313 (1971)
Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens, Inc., 241 F.3d 350 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
Branch v. Ogilvy & Mather, Inc., 772 F. Supp. 1359 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)
Brenner v. Manson, 383 U.S. 519 (1966)
Bright Tunes Music Corp. v. Harrisongs Music, Ltd., 420 F. Supp. 177 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Star Amusements, Inc., 44 F.3d 485 (7th Cir. 1995)
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Entertainment Complex, Inc., 198 F. Supp 2d 1291 (N.D. Ala. 2002)
Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477 (1977)
Canopy Music, Inc. v. Harbor Cities Broad., Inc., 950 F. Supp. 913 (E.D. Wis. 1997)
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994)
Cardservice Int'l, Inc. v. McGee, 950 F. Supp. 737 (E.D. Va. 1997)
Catanzaro v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 378 F. Supp. 203 (D. Del. 1974)
Celanese International Corp. B. P. Chemicals Ltd (1999) R.P.C. 203
Central Point Software, Inc. v. Nugent, 903 F. Supp. 1057 (E.D. Tex. 1995)
Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Sanders, 331 U.S. 125 (1947)
Channel Master Corp. v. JFD Elecs. Corp., 260 F. Supp. 568 (E.D.N.Y. 1966)
Chemtron, Inc. v. Aqua Prods., Inc., 830 F. Supp. 314 (E.D. Va. 1993)
Chi-Boy Music v. Charlie Club, Inc., 930 F.2d 1224 (7th Cir. 1991)
Clark v. Linzer Prods. Corp., 40 U.S.P.Q.2d 1469 (N.D. Ill. 1996)
Coca-Cola Co. v. Gemini Rising, Inc., 346 F. Supp. 1183 (E.D.N.Y. 1972)
Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971)
Construction Tech., Inc. v. Lockformer Co., 781 F. Supp. 195 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)
Crook Motor Co. v. Goolsby, 703 F. Supp. 511 (N.D. Miss. 1988)
Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & Mach. Works, 261 U.S. 24 (1923)
Crystal Semiconductor Corp. v. Tritech Microelectronics Int'l, Inc., 246 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
Davis v. Gap, Inc., 246 F.3d 152 (2d Cir. 2001)
DeAcosta v. Brown, 146 F.2d 408 (2d Cir. 1944)
Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp., 406 U.S. 518 (1972)
Deitel v. Chisholm, 42 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1930)
Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981)
Douglas Press, Inc. v. Arrow International, Inc., No. 95 C 3863, 1997 WL 441329 (N.D. Ill. July 30, 1997)
Dreamwerks Production Group, Inc. v. SKG Studio, 142 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 1998)
Eden Toys, Inc. v. Florelee Undergarment Co., 526 F. Supp. 1187 (S.D.N.Y. 1981), aff'd in part and rev'd in part, 697 F.2d 27 (2d Cir. 1982)
Eden Toys, Inc. v. Florelee Undergarment Co., 697 F.2d 27 (2d Cir. 1982)
E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Christopher, 431 F.2d 1012 (5th Cir. 1970)
Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003)
Estate of King v. CBS, Inc., 194 F.3d 1211 (11th Cir. 1999)
Ethicon, Inc. v. United States Surgical Corp., 135 F.3d 1456 (1998)
Fay v. Allen, 30 F. 446 (C.C.N.D.N.Y. 1887)
Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv., 499 U.S. 340 (1991)
Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc., 523 U.S. 340 (1998)
Festo Corp v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 535 U.S. 722 (2002)
Finance Inv. Co. (Berm.) Ltd. v. Geberit AG, 165 F.3d 526 (7th Cir. 1998)
First Jewelry Co. of Can., Inc. v. Internet Shopping Network, LLC, 53 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1838 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)
Flaminio v. Honda Motor Co., 733 F.2d 463 (7th Cir. 1984)
Florentine Art Studio, Inc. v. Vedet K. Corp., 891 F. Supp. 532 (C.D. Cal. 1995)
Fonar Corp. v. Gen. Elec. Co., 107 F.3d 1543 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
Fonovisa, Inc. v. Cherry Auction, Inc., 76 F.3d 259 (9th Cir. 1996)
Ford Motor Co. v. Summit Motor Products, Inc., 930 F.2d 277 (3d Cir. 1991)
Fromson v. Western Litho Plate & Supply Co., 853 F.2d 1568 (Fed. Cir. 1988)
Gargoyles Inc. v. United States, 113 F.3d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
Garretson v. Clark, 111 U.S. 120 (1884)
Gayler v. Wilder, 51 U.S. 477 (1850)
General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp., 461 U.S. 648 (1983)
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., 318 F. Supp. 1116 (S.D.N.Y. 1970), modified, 446 F.2d 295 (2d Cir. 1971)
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974)
Goodyear v. Bishop, 10 F. Cas. 642 (C.C.S.D.N.Y. 1861)
Grain Processing Corp. v. American Maize-Products Co., 185 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 1999), aff'g 979 F. Supp. 1233 (N.D. Ind. 1997)
Gruen Marketing Corp. v. Benrus Watch Co., 955 F. Supp. 979 (N.D. Ill. 1997)
Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Bros. & Co., 240 U.S. 251 (1916)
Hanson v. Alpine Valley Ski Area, Inc., 718 F.2d 1075 (Fed. Cir. 1983)
Hasbro Inc. v. Internet Entertainment Group, 40 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1479 (W.D. Wash. 1996)
Hayward v. Andrews, 106 U.S. 672 (1883)
Henri's Food Products, Co. v. Tasty Snacks, Inc., 817 F.2d 1303 (7th Cir. 1987)
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc., 909 F.2d 1464 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, 187 F.2d 52 (3d Cir. 1951)
I. A. E., Inc. v. Shaver, 74 F.3d 768 (7th Cir. 1996)
Image Tech. Servs. v. Eastman Kodak Co, 125 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 1997)
In re Aimster Copyright Litig., 334 F.3d 643 (7th Cir. 2003)
In re Indep. Servs. Org. Antitrust Litig., 203 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1077 (2001)
In re Mahurkar Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Patent Litig., 831 F. Supp. 1354 (N.D. Ill. 1993), aff'd, 71 F.3d 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
In-Tech Mktg. Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc., 685 F. Supp. 436 (D.N.J. 1988)
Independent Wireless Tel. Co. v. Radio Corp. of Am., 269 U.S. 459 (1926)
Intermatic Inc. v. Toeppen, 947 F. Supp. 1227 (N.D. Ill. 1996)
International House of Pancakes, Inc., v. Elca, Corp., 216 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 521 (T.T.A.B. 1982)
International Soc'y for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Stadium Auth., 479 F. Supp. 792 (W.D. Pa. 1979)
International Star Class Yacht Racing Ass'n v. Tommy Hilfiger, U.S.A., Inc., 80 F.3d 749 (2d Cir. 1996)
International Star Class Yacht Racing Ass'n v. Tommy Hilfiger, U.S.A., Inc., 959 F. Supp. 623 (S.D.N.Y. 1997), rev'd 146 F.3d 66 (2d. Cir. 1998)
International Star Class Yacht Racing Ass'n v. Tommy Hilfiger, U.S.A., Inc., 146 F.3d 66 (2d Cir. 1998)
International Star Class Yacht Racing Ass'n v. Tommy Hilfiger, U.S.A., Inc., No. 94 CIV 2663 (RPP), 81980, 1999 WL 108739 (S.DN.Y. Mar. 3, 1999), aff'd mem., 205 F.3d 1323 (2d Cir. 2000)
Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc., 456 U.S. 844 (1982)
Jacob Maxwell, Inc. v. Veeck, 110 F.3d 749 (11th Cir. 1997)
Jacobs Wind Elec. Co. v. Department of Transportation, 626 So. 2d 1333 (Fla. 1993)
J. E. M. AG Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred Int'l, Inc., 534 U.S. 124 (2001)
Jordan v. Time, Inc., 111 F.3d 102 (11th Cir. 1997)
Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Flakt, Inc., No. 93-1419, 1995 WL 408631 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 1995)
Kalman v. Berlyn Corp., 914 F.2d 1473 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp., 416 U.S. 470 (1974)
King Instrument Corp. v. Perego, 737 F. Supp. 1227 (D. Mass. 1990), aff'd, 65 F.3d 941 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
King Instrument Corp. v. Perego, 65 F.3d 941 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
King of the Mt. Sports, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 185 F.3d 1084 (10th Cir. 1999)
Knitwaves Inc. v. Lollytogs Ltd., 71 F.3d 996 (2d Cir. 1996)
Kori Corp. v. Wilco Marsh Buggies & Draglines, Inc., 561 F. Supp. 512 (E.D. La. 1981), aff'd, 761 F.2d 649 (Fed. Cir. 1985)
Lans v. Digital Equip. Corp., 252 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
Lear, Inc. v. Adkins, 395 U.S. 653 (1969)
Lipton v. Nature Co., 71 F.3d 464 (2d Cir 1995)
Littlefield v. Perry, 88 U.S. 205 (1874)
Livesay Window Co. v. Livesay Industries, 251 F.2d 469 (5th Cir. 1958)
MAI Sys. Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc., 991 F.2d 511 (9th Cir. 1993)
Mahurkar v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 79 F.3d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., 976 F.2d 700 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
Manville Sales Corp. v. Paramount Sys., 917 F.2d 544 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
Martin's Herend Imports, Inc. v. Diamond & Gem Trading USA, Co., 112 F.3d 1296 (5th Cir. 1997)
Maxwell v. J. Baker, Inc., 86 F.3d 1098 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
McNeilab, Inc. v. Scandipharm, Inc., 1996 WL 431352 (Fed. Cir. July 31, 1996), rev'g 862 F. Supp. 1351 (E.D. Pa. 1994)
Memphis Community Sch. Dist. v. Stachura, 477 U.S. 299 (1986)
Micro-Acoustics Corp. v. Bose Corp., 493 F. Supp. 356 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)
MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 259 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (C.D. Cal. 2003)
Money Store v. Harriscorp Fin., Inc., 689 F.2d 666 (7th Cir 1982)
Moore v. Marsh, 74 U.S. 515 (1868)
Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. 537 U.S. 418 (2003)
Motorola, Inc. v. Varo, Inc., 656 F. Supp. 716 (N.D. Tex. 1986)
N. A. S. Import, Corp. v. Chenson Enters., Inc., 968 F.2d 250 (2d Cir. 1992)
National Bd. of Young Women's Christian Ass'n v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n, 335 F. Supp. 615 (D.S.C. 1971)
National Lampoon, Inc. v. American Broad. Cos., 376 F. Supp. 733 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)
New York Times Co. v. Tasini, 533 U.S. 483 (2001)
Nichols v. Universal Pictures Corp., 45 F.2d 119 (2d Cir. 1930)
Nike Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 138 F.3d 1437 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
Oiness v. Walgreen Co., 88 F.3d 1025 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Genetics Inst., Inc., 52 F.3d 1026 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U.S. 103 (1990)
Overman Cushion Tire Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 59 F.2d 998 (2d Cir. 1932)
Pall Corp. v. Micron Separations, Inc., 66 F.3d 1211 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co., 162 N.E. 99 (N. Y. 1928)
Panavision Int'l, L.P. v. Toeppen, 141 F.3d 1316 (9th Cir. 1998)
Panavision Int'l, L.P. v. Toeppen, 141 F.3d 1316 (9th Cir. 1998), aff'g 938 F. Supp. 616 (C.D. Cal. 1996)
Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc., 575 F.2d 1152 (6th Cir. 1978)
Paper Converting Mach. Co. v. Magna-Graphics Corp., 745 F.2d 11 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322 (1979)
Parkson Corp. v. Fruit of the Loom Inc., 28 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1066 (E.D. Ark. 1992)
Peer Int'l Corp. v. Luna Records, Inc., 887 F. Supp. 560 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)
Pennsalt Chems. Corp. v. Dravo Corp., 240 F. Supp. 837 (E.D. Pa. 1965)
Pfizer, Inc. v. Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corp., 812 F. Supp. 1352 (D. Del. 1993)
Philp v. Nock, 84 U.S. 460 (1873)
Pitts v. Hall, 19 F. Cas. 754 (C.C.N.D.N.Y. 1851)
Pope Mfg. Co. v. Gormully & Jeffery Mfg. Co., 144 U.S. 248 (1892)
PPX Enters. v. Audiofidelity, Inc., 746 F.2d 120 (2d Cir. 1984)
Pritikin v. Liberation Publications, Inc., 83 F. Supp. 2d 920 (N.D. Ill. 1999)
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Paragon Trade Brands, Inc., 989 F. Supp. 547 (D. Del. 1997)
Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson, 390 U.S. 102 (1968)
Quabaug Rubber Co. v. Fabiano Shoe Co., 567 F.2d 154 (1st Cir. 1977)
Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Prods. Co., 514 U.S. 159 (1995)
Radio Steel & Mfg. Co. v. MTD Prods., Inc., 788 F.2d 1554 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
Rainville Co. v. Consupak, Inc., 407 F. Supp. 221 (D.N.J. 1976)
Read Corp. v. Portec, Inc., 970 F.2d 816 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Netcom On-Line Commun. Servs., 907 F. Supp. 1361 (N.D. Cal. 1995)
Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., 56 F.3d 1538 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
Rosso & Mastracco, Inc. v. Giant Food Inc., 720 F.2d 1263 (Fed. Cir. 1983)
Rude v. Westcott, 130 U.S. 152 (1889)
Rutherford v. Trim-Tex, Inc., 803 F. Supp. 158 (N.D. Ill. 1992)
Schneider (Europe) AG v. Scimed Life Sys., Inc., 852 F. Supp. 813 (D. Minn. 1994), aff'd mem., 60 F.3d 839 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
SecuraComm Consulting Inc. v. Securacom Inc., 166 F.3d 182 (3rd Cir. 1999)
Selle v. Gibb, 741 F.2d 896 (7th Cir. 1984)
Sessions v. Romadka, 145 U.S. 29 (1892)
Seymour v. McCormick, 57 U.S. 480 (1853)
Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp., 81 F.2d 49 (2d Cir. 1936)
Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures, 106 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1939)
Shields-Jetco Inc. v. Torti, 314 F. Supp. 1292 (D.R.I. 1970), aff'd on other grounds, 436 F.2d 1061 (1st Cir. 1971)
Slimfold Mfg. Co. v. Kinkead Indus., 932 F.2d 1453 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corp., 926 F.2d 1161 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
Snellman v. Ricoh Co., 862 F.2d 283 (Fed. Cir. 1988)
Songmaker v. Forward of Kansas, Inc., No. 90-4156-SAC, 1993 WL 484210 (D. Kan. 1993)
Sony Corp. of Am. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984)
SRI Int'l, Inc., v. Advanced Tech. Labs, Inc., 127 F.3d 1462 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
Stabilisierungsfonds Fur Wein v. Kaiser Stuhl Wine Distributors Pty., Ltd., 647 F.2d 200 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969)
State Indus., Inc. v. Mor-Flo Indus., Inc., 883 F.2d 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1989)
Stryker Corp. v. Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc., 891 F. Supp. 751, 825–32 (E.D.N.Y. 1995), aff'd, 96 F.3d 1409 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
STX, Inc. v. Bauer USA Inc., 43 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1492 (N.D. Cal. 1997)
Tap Publications, Inc. v. Chinese Yellow Pages (N. Y.) Inc., 925 F. Supp. 212 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
Taylor v. Meirick, 712 F.2d 1112 (7th Cir. 1983)
Tec Air, Inc. v. Denso Mfg. Mich. Inc., 192 F.3d 1353 (Fed. Cir. 1999)
Textile Productions, Inc. v. Mead Corp., 134 F.3d 1481 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
The Paper-Bag Cases, 105 U.S. 766 (1881)
Thomas v. American Cystoscope Makers, Inc., 414 F. Supp. 255 (E.D. Pa. 1976)
Toys “R” Us, Inc. v. Akkaoui, 40 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1836 (N.D. Cal. 1996)
Traditional Living, Inc. v. Energy Log Homes, Inc., 464 F. Supp. 1024 (N.D. Ala. 1978)
Trell v. Marlee Elecs. Corp., 912 F.2d 1443 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
Tri-Star Pictures, Inc. v. Leisure Time Prods., B.V., 749 F. Supp. 1243 (S.D.N.Y. 1990), aff'd, 17 F.3d 38 (2d Cir. 1994)
Trussell Mfg. Co. v. Wilson-Jones Co., 50 F.2d 1027 (2d Cir. 1931)
Twin Peaks Prods., Inc. v. Publications Int'l, Ltd., 996 F.2d 1366 (2d Cir. 1993)
TWM Manufacturing Co. v. Dura Corp., 789 F.2d 895 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
Ty, Inc. v. GMA Accessories, Inc., 132 F.3d 1167 (7th Cir. 1997)
Tycom Corp. v. Redactron Corp., 380 F. Supp. 1183 (D. Del. 1974)
Tyler v. Tuel, 10 U.S. 324 (1810)
United States v. Elcom Ltd., 203 F. Supp. 2d 1111 (N.D. Cal. 2002)
United States Football League v. National Football League, 644 F. Supp. 1040 (S.D.N.Y. 1986), aff'd, 842 F.2d 1335 (2d Cir. 1988)
Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001)
Vaupel Textilmaschinen KG v. Meccanica Euro Italia, S.p.A., 944 F.2d 870 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
Velo-Bind, Inc. v. Minn. Mining & Mfg. Co., 647 F.2d 965 (9th Cir. 1981)
Video Aided Instruction, Inc. v. Y & S Express, Inc., No. 96- CV-518-CBA, 1996 WL 711513 (E.D.N.Y. 1996)
Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Dreer, 224 F. Supp. 744 (E.D. Pa. 1963)
W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. v. Intercat, Inc., 60 F. Supp. 2d 316 (D. Del. 1999)
W. L. Gore & Assocs. v. Carlisle Corp., 198 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 353 (D. Del. 1978)
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros. Co., 529 U.S. 205 (2000)
Waldman Publ'g Corp. v. Landoll, Inc., 43 F.3d 775 (2d Cir. 1994)
Walt Disney Co. v. Video 47 Inc., 40 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1747 (S.D. Fla. 1996)
Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chem. Co., 520 U.S. 17 (1997)
Waterman v. Mackenzie, 138 U.S. 252 (1891)
Weinar v. Rollform Inc., 744 F.2d 797 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
Western Elec. Co. v. Pacent Reproducer Corp., 42 F.2d 116 (2d Cir. 1930)
Wildlife Express Corp. v. Carol Wright Sales, Inc., 18 F.3d 502 (7th Cir. 1994)
Wilson v. Rousseau, 45 U.S. 646 (1846)
Wine Ry. Appliance Co. v. Enter. Ry. Equip. Co., 297 U.S. 387 (1936)
Woods v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 920 F. Supp. 62 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. Sargent, 117 U.S. 536 (1886)
Zazu Designs v. L'Oreal, S.A., 979 F.2d 499 (7th Cir. 1992)
Zenix Indus. USA, Inc. v. King Hwa Indus. Co., No. 88–5760, 1990 WL 200234 (9th Cir. Oct. 3, 1990)
American Intellectual Property Law Association, Report of the Economic Survey (2003)
Abramowicz, Michael, Perfecting Patent Prizes, 56 Vand. L. Rev.115 (2003)Google Scholar
Addanki, Sumanth, Economics and Patent Damages: A Practical Guide, 532 PLI/Pat845 (1998)Google Scholar
Adelman, Martin J., Property Rights Theory and Patent-Antitrust: The Role of Compulsory Licensing, 52 NYU L. Rev.977 (1977)Google Scholar
Adelstein, Richard P. & Peretz, Steven I., The Competition of Technologies in Markets for Ideas: Copyright and Fair Use in Evolutionary Perspective, 5 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ.209 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akerlof, George A.The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, 84 Q. J. Econ.488 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, John R. & Lemley, Mark A., Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents, 26 AIPLA Q. J.185(1998)Google Scholar
Anderson, David A., Reputation, Compensation, and Proof, 25 Wm. & Mary L. Rev.747 (1984)Google Scholar
Aron, Debra J. & Wildman, Steven S., Economic Theories of Tying and Foreclosure Applied-and Not Applied-in Microsoft, 14 Antitrust48 (Fall 1999)Google Scholar
Kenneth J. Arrow, Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (1962)
Ayres, Ian & Klemperer, Paul, Limiting Patentees' Market Power Without Reducing Innovation Incentives: The Perverse Benefits of Uncertainty and Non-Injunctive Remedies, 97 Mich. L. Rev.985 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, Ian & Talley, Eric, Solomonic Bargaining: Dividing a Legal Entitlement to Facilitate Coasean Trade, 104 Yale L. J.1027, (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Margreth, Functionality, 61 Wash. & Lee L. Rev.79 (2004)Google Scholar
Beck, Roger L., The Prospect Theory of the Patent System and Unproductive Competition, 5 Res. L. & Econ.193 (1983)Google Scholar
Bell, Tom W., Fair Use vs. Fared Use: The Impact of Automated Rights Management on Copyright's Fair Use Doctrine, 76 N. C. L. Rev.557 (1998)Google Scholar
Bertrand, Joseph, Theorie Mathematique de la Richesse Sociale, 67 Journal des Savants499 (1883)Google Scholar
Bessy, Christian & Brousseau, Eric, Technology Licensing Contracts Features and Diversity, 18 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ.451 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John M. Blair, Economic Concentration (1972)
Blair, Roger D. & Kaserman, David L., A Note on Dual Input Monopoly and Tying, 10 Economics Leters494 (1982)Google Scholar
Roger D. Blair & Lawrence W. Kenny, Microeconomics for Managerial Decision Making (1982)
Blair, Roger D. & Cotter, Thomas F., An Economic Analysis of Damages Rules in Intellectual Property Law, 39 Wm. & Mary L. Rev.1585 (1998)Google Scholar
Blair, Roger D. & Cotter, Thomas F., The Elusive Logic of Standing Doctrine in Intellectual Property Law, 74 Tulane L. Rev.1323 (2000)Google Scholar
Blair, Roger D. & Cotter, Thomas F., Rethinking Patent Damages, 10 Tex. Intell. Prop. L. J.1 (2001)Google Scholar
Blair, Roger D. & Cotter, Thomas F., An Economic Analysis of Seller and User Liability in Intellectual Property Law, 68 U. Cin. L. Rev.1 (1999)Google Scholar
Blair, Roger D. & Page, William H., “Speculative” Antitrust Damages, 70 Wash. L. Rev.423 (1995)Google Scholar
Boldrin, Michele & Levine, David K., The Case Against Intellectual Property, 92 Am. Econ. Rev.209–12 (May 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bone, Robert G., A New Look at Trade Secret Law: Doctrine in Search of Justification, 86 Calif. L. Rev.241 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, Terry R., The Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995-Does It Address the Dilution Doctrine's Most Serious Problems?, 7 DePaul-LCA J. Art & Ent. L.75 (1996)Google Scholar
Borchard, William M., Reverse Passing Off-Commercial Robbery or Permissible Competition?, 67 Trademark Rep.1 (1977)Google Scholar
Robert H. Bork, The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself (1976)
Bowman, Ward S., Tying Arrangements and the Leverage Problem, 67 Yale L. J.19 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burk, Dan L. and Lemley, Mark A., Is Patent Law Technology-Specific?, 17 Berkeley Tech. L. J.1155 (2002)Google Scholar
Burk, Dan L., Muddy Rules for Cyberspace, 21 Cardozo L. Rev.121 (1999)Google Scholar
Burk, Dan L., Patenting Speech, 79 Tex. L. Rev.99 (2000)Google Scholar
Burk, Dan L., The Trouble with Trespass, 4 J. Small & Emerging Bus. L.27 (2000)Google Scholar
Dennis W. Carlton & Jeffrey M. Perloff, Modern Industrial Organization (3d ed., 2000)
Carter, Stephen L., The Trouble with Trademark, 99 Yale L. J.759 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph Cassady, Jr., Auctions and Auctioneering (1967)
Caves, Richard E. et al., The Imperfect Market for Technology Licenses, 45 Oxford Bull. Econ. & Stat.249 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edward H. Chamberlin, The Theory of Monopolistic Competition (8th ed. 1962)
Chin, Yee Wah, Unilateral Technology Suppression: Appropriate Antitrust and Patent Law Remedies, 66 Antitrust L. J.441 (1998)Google Scholar
Donald S. Chisum, Chisum on Patents (2002)
Jay, Pil Choi, Patent Litigation as an Information-Transmission Mechanism, 88 Am. Econ. Rev.1249 (1998)Google Scholar
Ciolino, Dane S. & Donelon, Erin A., Questioning Strict Liability in Copyright, 54 Rutgers L. Rev.351 (2002)Google Scholar
Coase, R. H., The Lighthouse in History, 17 J. L. Econ.357 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H., The Problem of Social Cost, 3 J. L. Econ.1 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Joel M. & Burke, Arthur J., An Overview of the Antitrust Analysis of Suppression of Technology, 66 Antitrust L. J.421 (1998)Google Scholar
Cohen, Julie E., Lochner in Cyberspace: The New Economic Orthodoxy of “Rights Management”, 97 Mich. L. Rev.462 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Julie E. & Lemley, Mark A., Patent Scope and Innovation in the Software Industry, 89 Calif. L. Rev.1 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesley M. Cohen et al., Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (Or Not), NBER Working Paper No. 7552 (Feb. 2000)
Colb, Sherry F., The Qualitative Dimension of Fourth Amendment “Reasonableness”, 98 Colum. L. Rev.1642 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules L. & Kraus, Jody, Rethinking the Theory of Legal Rights, 95 Yale L. J.335 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conigliaro, Matthew J. et al., Foreseeability in Patent Law, 16 Berkeley Tech. L. J.1045 (2001)Google Scholar
Conley, Ned L., An Economic Approach to Patent Damages, 15 AIPLA Q. J.354 (1987)Google Scholar
Robert Cooter & Thomas Ulen, Law and Economics (1988)
Carlos M. Correa & Abdulqawi A. Yusuf, Intellectual Property and International Trade, The TRIPs Agreement (1998)
Carlos M. Correa, Intellectual Property Rights, the WTO and Developing Countries (2000)
Coombe, Rosemary J., Objects of Property and Subjects of Politics: Intellectual Property Laws and Democratic Dialogue, 69 Tex. L. Rev.1853 (1991)Google Scholar
Cotter, Thomas F., Conflicting Interests in Trade Secrets, 48 48591 (1996)Google Scholar
Cotter, Thomas F., Do Federal Uses of Intellectual Property Implicate the Fifth Amendment?, 50 Fla. L. Rev.529 (1998)Google Scholar
Thomas F. Cotter, An Economic Analysis of Enhanced Damages and Attorneys' Fees for Willful Patent Infringement, 14 Federal Circuit Bar Journal (forthcoming 2004)
Cotter, Thomas F., Gutenberg's Legacy: Copyright, Censorship, and Religious Pluralism, 91 Calif. L. Rev.323 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotter, Thomas F., Intellectual Property and the Essential Facilities Doctrine, 44 Antitrust Bull.211 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotter, Thomas F., Owning What Doesn't Exist, Where it Doesn't Exist: Rethinking Two Doctrines from the Common Law of Trademarks, 1995 U. Ill. L. Rev.487 (1995)Google Scholar
Cotter, Thomas F., Pragmatism, Economics, and the Droit Moral, 76 N. C. L. Rev.1 (1997)Google Scholar
Cotter, Thomas F., Market Fundamentalism and the TRIPs Agreement, 22 Cardozo Arts & Enter. L. J.307 (2004)Google Scholar
Augustin A. Cournot, Recherches sur les Principes Mathematiques de la Theorie des Richesses (1838)
Coury, Larry, C'est What? Saisie! A Comparison of Patent Infringement Remedies Among the G7 Economic Nations, 13 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L. J.1053 (2003)Google Scholar
Cox, Alan J., Antitrust and Intellectual Property Market Definition, 524 PLI/Pat129 (1998)Google Scholar
Craswell, Richard, Deterrence and Damags: The Multiplier Principle and its Alternatives, 97 Mich. L. Rev.2185 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craswell, Richard & Calfee, John E., Deterrence and Uncertain Legal Standards, 2 J. L. Econ. & Org.279 (1986)Google Scholar
Crew, Eugene, Foreword: Symposium on Antitrust and the Suppression of Technology in the United States and Europe: Is There a Remedy?, 66 Antitrust L. J.415 (1998)Google Scholar
George Ticknor Curtis, A Treatise on the Law of Patents for Useful Inventions: As Enacted and Administered in the United States (3d ed. 1867)
Dam, Kenneth W., The Economic Underpinnings of Patent Law, 23 J. Legal Stud.247 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, Harold, When Does the Rule of Liability Matter?, 1 J. Legal Stud.13 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denicola, Robert C., Trademarks as Speech: Constitutional Implications of the Emerging Rationales for the Protection of Trade Symbols, Wis. L. Rev.158 (1982)
Director, Aaron & Levi, Edward H., Law and the Future: Trade Regulation, 51 Nw. U. L. Rev.281 (1956)Google Scholar
Dan B. Dobbs, Law of Remedies (2d ed. 1993)
Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper, Dethroning Lear: Licensee Estoppel and the Incentive to Innovate, 72 Va. L. Rev.677 (1986)CrossRef
Einhorn, Michael A., Copyright, Prevention, and Rational Governance: File-Sharing and Napster, 24 Colum.-VLA J. L. & Arts449 (2001)Google Scholar
Elkin-Koren, Niva & Salzberger, Eli M., Law and Economics in Cyberspace, 19 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ.553 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, David S., Market Definition in Antitrust and Patent Litigation, 414 PLI/Pat595 (1995)Google Scholar
Feldman, Joel R., Note, Reverse Confusion in Trademarks: Balancing the Interests of the Public, the Trademark Owner, and the Infringer, 8 J. Tech. L. & Pol'y163 (2003)Google Scholar
Fisher, William W. III, Reconstructing the Fair Use Doctrine, 101 Harv. L. Rev.1659, (1988)Google Scholar
Friedman, David D. et al., Some Economics of Trade Secret Law, 5 J. Econ. Perspectives61 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudenberg, Drew et al., Preemption, Leapfrogging and Competition in Patent Races, 22 Eur. Econ. Rev.3 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallini, Nancy T., Patent Policy and Costly Imitation, 23 RAND J. Econ.52 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallini, Nancy T. & Wright, Brian D., Technology Transfer Under Asymmetric Information, 21 Rand J. Econ.147 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard J. Gilbert, Patents, Sleeping Patents, and Entry Deterrence, in Strategy, Predation, and Antitrust Analysis (Steven C. Salop ed., 1981)
Gilbert, Richard J. & Katz, Michael L., Perspectives on Intellectual Property: When Good Value Chains Go Bad: The Economics of Indirect Liability for Copyright Infringement, 52 Hastings L. J.961 (2001)Google Scholar
Gilbert, Richard J. & Newbery, David M. G., Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly, 72 Am. Econ. Rev.514 (1982)Google Scholar
Gilbert, Richard J. & Sunshine, Steven C., Incorporating Dynamic Efficiency Concerns in Merger Analysis: The Use of Innovation Markets, 63 Antitrust L. J.569 (1995)Google Scholar
Paul Goldstein, Copyright (2d ed. 2002)
Paul Goldstein, Copyright's Highway: From Gutenberg to the Celestial Jukebox (Hill & Wang 1994)
Wendy J. Gordon, Excuse and Justification in the Law of Fair Use: Commodification and Market Perspectives, in The Commodification of Information (Niva Elkin-Koren & Neil Weinstock Netanel eds., 2002)
Gordon, Wendy J., Fair Use as Market Failure: A Structural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and its Predecessors, 82 Colum. L. Rev.1600 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, Mark F. & Alexander, Jay I., Patent Law and Rent Dissipation, 78 Va. L. Rev.305 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Bronwyn H. & Ziedonis, Rosemarie Ham, The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979–1995, 32 Rand J. Econ.101 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, I. Trotter, The Ancient Doctrine of Trespass to Web Sites, 1996 J. Online L. art.7 (1996)Google Scholar
Heald, Paul J., Comment, Money Damages and Corrective Advertising: An Economic Analysis, 55 U. Chi. L. Rev.629 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heald, Paul J., Payment Demands for Spurious Copyrights: Four Causes of Action, 1 J. Intell. Prop. L.259 (1994)Google Scholar
Heines, M. Henry, Indispensable Parties in Patent Litigation, 58 J. Pat. Off. Soc'y232 (1976)Google Scholar
Heller, Michael A. & Eisenberg, Rebecca S., Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research, 280 Science698 (1998)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holman, Molly A. & Munzer, Stephen R., Intellectual Property Rights in Genes and Gene Fragments: A Registration Solution for Expressed Sequence Tags, 85 Iowa L. Rev.735 (2000)Google ScholarPubMed
Ethan Horwitz & Lester Horwitz, Patent Litigation: Procedure & Tactics (2001)
Janicke, Paul M., Contemporary Issues in Patent Damages, 42 Am. U. L. Rev.691 (1993)Google Scholar
Jarosz, John C. & Page, Erin M., The Panduit Lost Profits Test After BIC Leisure v. Windsurfing, 3 Fed. Cir. B. J.311 (1993)Google Scholar
Kalos, Stephen H. & Putnam, Jonathan D., On the Incomparability of “Comparable”: An Economic Interpretation of “Infringer's Royalties”, 9 No.4J. Proprietary Rts.2 (1997)Google Scholar
Karp, Larry S. & Perloff, Jeffrey M., The Optimal Suppression of a Low-Cost Technology by a Durable-Good Monopoly, 27 Rand J. Econ.346 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Michael L. & Shapiro, Carl, How to License Intangible Property, 101 Q. J. Econ.567 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyes, Jeffrey J. et al., Tying, Exclusive Dealing, and Franchising Issues, 1117 PLI/Corp.9 (1999)Google Scholar
Kieff, F. Scott, Property Rights and Property Rules for Commercializing Inventions, 85 Minn. L. Rev.697 (2000)Google Scholar
F. Scott Kieff, The Case for Registering Patents and the Law and Economics of Present Patent-Obtaining Rules (in draft 2003)
Kitch, Edmund W., Can the Internet Shrink Fair Use?, 78 Neb. L. Rev.880 (1999)Google Scholar
Kitch, Edmund W., The Nature and Function of the Patent System, 20 J. L. & Econ.265 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin Klein et al., The Economics of Copyright “Fair Use” in a Networked World, 92 Am. Econ. Rev. (Papers and Proceedings) 205 (May 2002)
Koegel, John B., Bamboozlement: The Repeal of Copyright Registration Incentives, 13 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L. J.529 (1995)Google Scholar
Kozinski, Alex, Trademarks Unplugged, 68 N.Y.U.L. Rev.960 (1993)Google Scholar
Krosin, Kenneth E. & Kozlowski, Holly D., Patent Damages, 300 PLI/Pat53 (1990)Google Scholar
Ku, Raymond Shih Ray, The Creative Destruction of Copyright: Napster and the New Economics of Digital Technology, 69 U. Chi. L. Rev.263 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, William M., Optimal Sanctions for Antitrust Violations, 50 U. Chi. L. Rev.652 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, William M. & Posner, Richard A., Causation in Tort Law: An Economic Approach, 12 J. Legal Stud.109 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, William M. & Posner, Richard A., An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law, 18 J. Legal Stud.325 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
William M. Landes & Richard A. Posner, The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law (2003)
William M. Landes & Richard A. Posner, The Economic Structure of Tort Law (1987)
William M. Landes & Richard A. Posner, Indefinitely Renewable Copyright, 70 U. Chi. L. Rev. 471 (2003)
Lee, William F. et al., When an Exclusive License Is Not an Exclusive License: The Standing of “Exclusive” Patent Licensees to Sue After Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Genetics Institute, Inc., 7 Fed. Circuit B. J.1 (1997)Google Scholar
Leibovitz, John S., Note, Inventing a Nonexclusive Patent System, 111 Yale L. J.2251 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemley, Mark A., The Economics of Improvement in Intellectual Property Law, 75 Tex. L. Rev.989 (1997)Google Scholar
Lemley, Mark A. & McGowan, David, Legal Implications of Network Economic Effects, 86 Calif. L. Rev.479 (May 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemley, Mark A., Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office, 95 Nw. U. L. Rev.1495 (2001)Google Scholar
Lemley, Mark A. & Volokh, Eugene, Freedom of Speech and Injunctions in Intellectual Property Cases, 48 Duke L. J.147 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Richard C. et al., Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development, 3 Brookings Papers on Economic Activity783 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtman, Douglas Gary, The Economics of Innovation: Protecting Unpatentable Goods, 81 Minn. L. Rev.693 (1997)Google Scholar
Lichtman, Douglas & Landes, William, Indirect Liability for Copyright Infringement: An Economic Perspective, 16 Harv. J. Law & Tech.395 (2003)Google Scholar
Lidsky, Lyrissa Barnett, Defamation, Reputation, and the Myth of Community, 71 Wash. L. Rev.1 (1996)Google Scholar
Litman, Jessica, The Exclusive Right to Read, 13 Cardozo Arts & Enter. L. J.29 (1994)Google Scholar
Long, Clarisa, Patent Signals, 69 U. Chi. L. Rev.625 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunney, Glynn S. Jr., The Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 87 Va. L. Rev.813 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Charles C., Who Will Own Your Next Good Idea, Atlantic Monthly57 (Sept. 1998)Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edwin et al., Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study, 91 Econ. J.907 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markarian, James M., Can the Marking Requirements for a Patented Article Be Circumvented by Obtaining a Process Patent?, 17 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y365 (1997)Google Scholar
Maurer, Stephen M. & Scotchmer, Suzanne, The Independent Invention Defense in Intellectual Property, 69 Economica535 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J. Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition (4th ed. 2003)
McFetridge, Donald G. & Smith, Douglas A., Patents, Prospects, and Economic Surplus: A Comment, 23 J. Law & Econ.197 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meese, Alan J., Tying Meets the New Institutional Economics: Farewell to the Chimera of Forcing, 146 U. Pa. L. Rev.1 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, Michael J., The Patent Marking and Notice Statute: A Question of “Fact” or “Act”?, 9 Harv. J. L. & Tech.429 (1996)Google Scholar
Merges, Robert P., Contracting into Liability Rules: Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organizations, 84 Cal. L. Rev.1293, 1296 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merges, Robert P., Intellectual Property Rights and Bargaining Breakdown: The Case of Blocking Patents, 62 Tenn. L. Rev.75 (1994)Google Scholar
Robert P. Merges, Patent Law and Policy: Cases and Materials 1097 (2d ed. 1997)
Merges, Robert P., Rent Control in the Patent District: Observations on the Grady-Alexander Thesis, 78 Va. L. Rev.359 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merges, Robert P. & Nelson, Richard R., On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope”, 90 Colum. L. Rev.839 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, David J., Patent Marking Statute May Need Major Overhaul, Nat'l L. J., Dec. 24, 2001, at C5Google Scholar
Roger M. Milgrim, Milgrim on Licensing (2003)
James William Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice (3d ed. 1999)
Moore, Kimberly A., Judges, Juries, and Patent Cases – An Empirical Peek Inside the Black Box, 99 Mich. L. Rev.365 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Preston & Nakamura, Jackie, The United States Patent Marking and Notice Statute, 22 AIPLA Q. J.85 (1994)Google Scholar
Nance, Dale A., Guidance Rules and Enforcement Rules: A Better View of the Cathedral, 83 Va. L. Rev.837 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry Nalebuff, Bundling (November 22, 1999). Yale ICF Working Paper Series No. 99–14. (available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=185193)
Netanel, Neil Weinstock, Copyright and a Democratic Civil Society, 106 Yale L. J.283 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter Nicholson, Microeconomic Theory (5th ed. 1992)
Nimmer, David, Copyright in the Dead Sea Scrolls: Authorship and Originality, 38 Hous. L. Rev.1 (2001)Google Scholar
Melville B. Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright (2003)
Markus Nolff, TRIPs, PCT and Global Patent Procurement (2001)
Note, , Trade Secret Misappropriation: A Cost-Benefit Response to the Fourth Amendment Analogy, 106 Harv. L. Rev.461 (1992)Google Scholar
Ogburn, William F. & Thomas, Dorothy, Are Inventions Inevitable? A Note on Social Evolution, 37 Pol. Sci. Q.83 (1922)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppedahl, Carl, Patent Marking of Systems, 11 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L. J.205 (1995)Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Maureen, Fencing Cyberspace: Drawing Borders in a Vertical World, 82 Minn. L. Rev.609 (1998)Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Maureen, Toward a Doctrine of Fair Use in Patent Law, 100 Colum. L. Rev.1177 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parchomovsky, Gideon & Siegelman, Peter, Towards an Integrated Theory of Intellectual Property, 88 Va. L. Rev.1455 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
William F. Patry, The Fair Use Privilege in Copyright Law (1985)
Perlmutter, Shira, Freeing Copyright from Formalities, 13 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L. J.565 (1995)Google Scholar
Pincus, Laura B., The Computation of Damages in Patent Infringement Actions, 5 595 (1991)Google Scholar
Robert S. Pindyck & Daniel L. Rubinfeld, Microeconomics (4th ed. 1998)
Posner, Richard A., An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law, 85 Colum. L. Rev.1193 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard A. Posner, Economic Analysis of Law (4th ed. 1992)
Priest, George L., What Economists Can Tell Lawyers About Intellectual Property: Comment on Cheung, 8 Res. L. & Econ.19 (1986)Google Scholar
Rabowsky, Brent, Note, Recovery of Lost Profits on Unpatented Products in Patent Infringement Cases, 70 S. Cal. L. Rev.281 (1996)Google Scholar
Reese, R. Anthony, The Public Display Right: The Copyright Act's Neglected Solution to the Controversy Over RAM “Copies”, 2001 U. Ill. L. Rev.83
Reichman, J. H., Legal Hybrids Between the Patent and Copyright Paradigms, 94 Colum. L. Rev.2432 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennifer F. Reinganum, The Timing of Innovation: Research, Development, and Diffusion, Handbook of Industrial Organization (Richard Schmalensee & Robert D. Willig eds., 1989)
Reinganum, Jennifer F., Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly, 73 Am. Econ. Rev.741 (1983)Google Scholar
Edward W. Remus et al., Prerequisites to Recovery of Damages: Importance of Marking and Notice of Infringement, CA15 ALI-ABA 413 (Nov. 9, 1995)
William C. Robinson, The Law of Patents for Useful Inventions (1890)
Rowley, Fred Anthony Jr., Note, Dynamic Copyright Law: Its Problems and a Possible Solution, 11Harv. J. L. & Tech.481 (1991)Google Scholar
Salant, Stephen, Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly: Comment, 74 Am. Econ. Rev.247 (1984)Google Scholar
F. M. Scherer, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (2d ed. 1980)
F. M. Scherer et al., Patents and the Corporation: A Report on Industrial Technology Under Changing Public Policy (2d ed. 1959)
F. M. Scherer, Competition Policy, Domestic and International (Edward Elgar 2000)
John W. Schlicher, Licensing Intellectual Property: Legal, Business, and Market Dynamics (1996)
Schlicher, John W., Measuring Patent Damages by the Market Value of Inventions – The Grain Processing, Rite-Hite, and Aro Rules, 82 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'503 (2000)Google Scholar
John W. Schlicher, Patent Law: Legal and Economic Principles (2002)
Suzanne Scotchmer, Incentives to Innovate, in Palgrave Encyclopedia of Law & Economics 273 (1998)
Scotchmer, Suzanne, Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law, J. Econ. Persp. (Winter 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seberoff, Steven C., New Requirements in Patent Marking and Notice, 76 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y793 (1994)Google Scholar
Shapiro, Carl, Antitrust Limits to Patent Settlements, 34 Rand J. Econ. (forthcoming 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, Steven, An Analysis of Causation and the Scope of Liability in the Law of Torts, 9 J. Legal Stud.463 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherry, Edward F. & Teece, David W., Some Economic Aspects of Intellectual Property Damages, 573 PLI/Pat399 (1999)Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert, Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science, 49 Am. Econ. Rev.253, (1959)Google Scholar
John M. Skenyon et al., Patent Damages Law & Practice (2002)
Sterk, Stewart E., Rhetoric and Reality in Copyright Law, 94 Mich. L. Rev.1197 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Marion B., Calculating Economic Damages in Intellectual Property Disputes: The Role of Market Definition, 77 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y321 (1995)Google Scholar
Strickland, J. Michael, Note, Nonexclusive Patent Licensees Unite: Use Bankruptcy Committees to Sue for Patent Infringement, 48 Duke L. J.571 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
C. T. Taylor & Z. A. Silbertson, The Economic Impact of the Patent System (1973)
Thurmon, Mark A., The Rise and Fall of Trademark Law's Functionality Defense, 56 Fla. L. Rev.243 (forthcoming 2004)Google Scholar
Jean Tirole, The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988)
D. C. Toedt, The Law and Business of Computer Software (1998)
Turner, Julie S., Comment, The Nonmanufacturing Patent Owner: Toward a Theory of Efficient Infringement, 86 Cal. L. Rev.179 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, John, Pre-Emptive Patenting, Joint Ventures, and the Persistence of Oligopoly, 3 Int'l J. Indus. Org.261 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voelzke, Joel, Patent Marking Under 35 U.S.C. 287(a): Products, Processes, and the Deception of the Public, 5 Fed. Cir. B. J.317 (1995)Google Scholar
R. Polk Wagner, (Mostly) Against Exceptionalism (2002 draft)
Wagner, R. Polk, Reconsidering Estoppel: Patent Administration and the Failure of Festo, 151 U. Pa. L. Rev.159 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard Watt, Copyright and Economic Theory: Friends or Foes? (2000)
Werden, Gregory J. et al., Economic Analysis of Lost Profits from Patent Infringement With and Without Noninfringing Substitutes, 27 AIPLA Q. J.305 (1999)Google Scholar
Weston, Ray D. Jr., A Comparative Analysis of the Doctrine of Equivalents: Can European Approaches Solve an American Dilemma?, 39 IDEA35 (1998)Google Scholar
Whinston, Michael D., Tying, Foreclosure, and Exclusion, 80 Am. Econ. Rev.837 (1990)Google Scholar
James J. White & Robert S. Summers, Uniform Commercial Code (4th ed. 1995)
Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure (3d ed. 2002)
Yamamoto, Shusato & Tessensohn, John A., Doctrine of Equivalents Adds Torque to Japanese Patent Infringement, 81 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y483 (1999)Google Scholar
Yen, Alfred C., What Federal Gun Control Can Teach Us About the DMCA's Anti-Trafficking Provisions, Wis. L. Rev.649 (2003)Google Scholar
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, art. 28, Legal Instruments – Results of the Uruguay Round vol. 31, 33 I.L.M. 1197 (1994)
House Report No. 79-1587 (1946), reprinted in 2 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1387 (1946)
House Report No. 94-1476, at 159, reprinted in 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 5775
House Report No. 104-556, reprinted in 996 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1074
ICANN, Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy, http://www.icann.org/udrp/udrp-policy-24oct99.htm
Information Infrastructure Task Force, Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure: The Report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (1995)
The Protection of Utility Models in the Single Market: Green Paper from the Commission to the European Council, COM(95)370 final
Senate Report No. 79-1503 (1946), reprinted in 2 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1387 (1946)
A. L. Smith Iron Co. v. Dickson, 141 F.2d 3 (2d Cir. 1944)
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001)
Abbott Lab. v. Diamedix Corp., 47 F.3d 1128 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
Advanced Display Systems, Inc. v. Kent State Univ., 212 F.3d 1272 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
Aeroquip Corp. v. United States, 37 Fed. Cl. 139 (1997)
Althin CD Med., Inc. v. West Suburban Kidney Ctr., S.C., 874 F. Supp. 837 (N.D. Ill. 1994)
American Medical Sys., Inc. v. Medical Engineering Corp., 6 F.3d 1523 (Fed. Cir. 1993)
Amsted Indus., Inc. v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co., 24 F.3d 178 (Fed. Cir. 1994)
Apple Computer, Inc. v. Articulate Systems, Inc., 234 F.3d 14 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
Arachnid, Inc. v. Merit Indus., Inc., 939 F.2d 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co. (Aro II), 377 U.S. 476, (1964)
Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co., 440 U.S. 257 (1979)
Association of Coop. Members, Inc. v. Farmland Indus., Inc., 684 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir. 1982)
Atlantic Thermoplastics Co. v. Faytex Corp., 970 F.2d 834 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
Augustine Med., Inc. v. Gaymar Indus., 181 F.3d 1291 (Fed. Cir. 1999)
Avery Dennison Corp. v. Sumpton, 189 F.3d 868 (9th Cir. 1999)
Berry v. Sugar Notch Borough, 43 A. 240 (1899)
BIC Leisure Prods. v. Windsurfing Int'l, Inc., 1 F.3d 1214 (Fed. Cir. 1993)
Birdsell v. Shaliol, 112 U.S. 485 (1884)
Blonder-Tongue Lab., Inc. v. University of Ill. Found., 402 U.S. 313 (1971)
Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens, Inc., 241 F.3d 350 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
Branch v. Ogilvy & Mather, Inc., 772 F. Supp. 1359 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)
Brenner v. Manson, 383 U.S. 519 (1966)
Bright Tunes Music Corp. v. Harrisongs Music, Ltd., 420 F. Supp. 177 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Star Amusements, Inc., 44 F.3d 485 (7th Cir. 1995)
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Entertainment Complex, Inc., 198 F. Supp 2d 1291 (N.D. Ala. 2002)
Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477 (1977)
Canopy Music, Inc. v. Harbor Cities Broad., Inc., 950 F. Supp. 913 (E.D. Wis. 1997)
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994)
Cardservice Int'l, Inc. v. McGee, 950 F. Supp. 737 (E.D. Va. 1997)
Catanzaro v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 378 F. Supp. 203 (D. Del. 1974)
Celanese International Corp. B. P. Chemicals Ltd (1999) R.P.C. 203
Central Point Software, Inc. v. Nugent, 903 F. Supp. 1057 (E.D. Tex. 1995)
Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Sanders, 331 U.S. 125 (1947)
Channel Master Corp. v. JFD Elecs. Corp., 260 F. Supp. 568 (E.D.N.Y. 1966)
Chemtron, Inc. v. Aqua Prods., Inc., 830 F. Supp. 314 (E.D. Va. 1993)
Chi-Boy Music v. Charlie Club, Inc., 930 F.2d 1224 (7th Cir. 1991)
Clark v. Linzer Prods. Corp., 40 U.S.P.Q.2d 1469 (N.D. Ill. 1996)
Coca-Cola Co. v. Gemini Rising, Inc., 346 F. Supp. 1183 (E.D.N.Y. 1972)
Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971)
Construction Tech., Inc. v. Lockformer Co., 781 F. Supp. 195 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)
Crook Motor Co. v. Goolsby, 703 F. Supp. 511 (N.D. Miss. 1988)
Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & Mach. Works, 261 U.S. 24 (1923)
Crystal Semiconductor Corp. v. Tritech Microelectronics Int'l, Inc., 246 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
Davis v. Gap, Inc., 246 F.3d 152 (2d Cir. 2001)
DeAcosta v. Brown, 146 F.2d 408 (2d Cir. 1944)
Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp., 406 U.S. 518 (1972)
Deitel v. Chisholm, 42 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1930)
Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981)
Douglas Press, Inc. v. Arrow International, Inc., No. 95 C 3863, 1997 WL 441329 (N.D. Ill. July 30, 1997)
Dreamwerks Production Group, Inc. v. SKG Studio, 142 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 1998)
Eden Toys, Inc. v. Florelee Undergarment Co., 526 F. Supp. 1187 (S.D.N.Y. 1981), aff'd in part and rev'd in part, 697 F.2d 27 (2d Cir. 1982)
Eden Toys, Inc. v. Florelee Undergarment Co., 697 F.2d 27 (2d Cir. 1982)
E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Christopher, 431 F.2d 1012 (5th Cir. 1970)
Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003)
Estate of King v. CBS, Inc., 194 F.3d 1211 (11th Cir. 1999)
Ethicon, Inc. v. United States Surgical Corp., 135 F.3d 1456 (1998)
Fay v. Allen, 30 F. 446 (C.C.N.D.N.Y. 1887)
Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv., 499 U.S. 340 (1991)
Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc., 523 U.S. 340 (1998)
Festo Corp v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 535 U.S. 722 (2002)
Finance Inv. Co. (Berm.) Ltd. v. Geberit AG, 165 F.3d 526 (7th Cir. 1998)
First Jewelry Co. of Can., Inc. v. Internet Shopping Network, LLC, 53 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1838 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)
Flaminio v. Honda Motor Co., 733 F.2d 463 (7th Cir. 1984)
Florentine Art Studio, Inc. v. Vedet K. Corp., 891 F. Supp. 532 (C.D. Cal. 1995)
Fonar Corp. v. Gen. Elec. Co., 107 F.3d 1543 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
Fonovisa, Inc. v. Cherry Auction, Inc., 76 F.3d 259 (9th Cir. 1996)
Ford Motor Co. v. Summit Motor Products, Inc., 930 F.2d 277 (3d Cir. 1991)
Fromson v. Western Litho Plate & Supply Co., 853 F.2d 1568 (Fed. Cir. 1988)
Gargoyles Inc. v. United States, 113 F.3d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
Garretson v. Clark, 111 U.S. 120 (1884)
Gayler v. Wilder, 51 U.S. 477 (1850)
General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp., 461 U.S. 648 (1983)
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., 318 F. Supp. 1116 (S.D.N.Y. 1970), modified, 446 F.2d 295 (2d Cir. 1971)
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974)
Goodyear v. Bishop, 10 F. Cas. 642 (C.C.S.D.N.Y. 1861)
Grain Processing Corp. v. American Maize-Products Co., 185 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 1999), aff'g 979 F. Supp. 1233 (N.D. Ind. 1997)
Gruen Marketing Corp. v. Benrus Watch Co., 955 F. Supp. 979 (N.D. Ill. 1997)
Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Bros. & Co., 240 U.S. 251 (1916)
Hanson v. Alpine Valley Ski Area, Inc., 718 F.2d 1075 (Fed. Cir. 1983)
Hasbro Inc. v. Internet Entertainment Group, 40 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1479 (W.D. Wash. 1996)
Hayward v. Andrews, 106 U.S. 672 (1883)
Henri's Food Products, Co. v. Tasty Snacks, Inc., 817 F.2d 1303 (7th Cir. 1987)
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc., 909 F.2d 1464 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, 187 F.2d 52 (3d Cir. 1951)
I. A. E., Inc. v. Shaver, 74 F.3d 768 (7th Cir. 1996)
Image Tech. Servs. v. Eastman Kodak Co, 125 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 1997)
In re Aimster Copyright Litig., 334 F.3d 643 (7th Cir. 2003)
In re Indep. Servs. Org. Antitrust Litig., 203 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1077 (2001)
In re Mahurkar Double Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter Patent Litig., 831 F. Supp. 1354 (N.D. Ill. 1993), aff'd, 71 F.3d 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
In-Tech Mktg. Inc. v. Hasbro, Inc., 685 F. Supp. 436 (D.N.J. 1988)
Independent Wireless Tel. Co. v. Radio Corp. of Am., 269 U.S. 459 (1926)
Intermatic Inc. v. Toeppen, 947 F. Supp. 1227 (N.D. Ill. 1996)
International House of Pancakes, Inc., v. Elca, Corp., 216 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 521 (T.T.A.B. 1982)
International Soc'y for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Stadium Auth., 479 F. Supp. 792 (W.D. Pa. 1979)
International Star Class Yacht Racing Ass'n v. Tommy Hilfiger, U.S.A., Inc., 80 F.3d 749 (2d Cir. 1996)
International Star Class Yacht Racing Ass'n v. Tommy Hilfiger, U.S.A., Inc., 959 F. Supp. 623 (S.D.N.Y. 1997), rev'd 146 F.3d 66 (2d. Cir. 1998)
International Star Class Yacht Racing Ass'n v. Tommy Hilfiger, U.S.A., Inc., 146 F.3d 66 (2d Cir. 1998)
International Star Class Yacht Racing Ass'n v. Tommy Hilfiger, U.S.A., Inc., No. 94 CIV 2663 (RPP), 81980, 1999 WL 108739 (S.DN.Y. Mar. 3, 1999), aff'd mem., 205 F.3d 1323 (2d Cir. 2000)
Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc., 456 U.S. 844 (1982)
Jacob Maxwell, Inc. v. Veeck, 110 F.3d 749 (11th Cir. 1997)
Jacobs Wind Elec. Co. v. Department of Transportation, 626 So. 2d 1333 (Fla. 1993)
J. E. M. AG Supply, Inc. v. Pioneer Hi-Bred Int'l, Inc., 534 U.S. 124 (2001)
Jordan v. Time, Inc., 111 F.3d 102 (11th Cir. 1997)
Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Flakt, Inc., No. 93-1419, 1995 WL 408631 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 1995)
Kalman v. Berlyn Corp., 914 F.2d 1473 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp., 416 U.S. 470 (1974)
King Instrument Corp. v. Perego, 737 F. Supp. 1227 (D. Mass. 1990), aff'd, 65 F.3d 941 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
King Instrument Corp. v. Perego, 65 F.3d 941 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
King of the Mt. Sports, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 185 F.3d 1084 (10th Cir. 1999)
Knitwaves Inc. v. Lollytogs Ltd., 71 F.3d 996 (2d Cir. 1996)
Kori Corp. v. Wilco Marsh Buggies & Draglines, Inc., 561 F. Supp. 512 (E.D. La. 1981), aff'd, 761 F.2d 649 (Fed. Cir. 1985)
Lans v. Digital Equip. Corp., 252 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
Lear, Inc. v. Adkins, 395 U.S. 653 (1969)
Lipton v. Nature Co., 71 F.3d 464 (2d Cir 1995)
Littlefield v. Perry, 88 U.S. 205 (1874)
Livesay Window Co. v. Livesay Industries, 251 F.2d 469 (5th Cir. 1958)
MAI Sys. Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc., 991 F.2d 511 (9th Cir. 1993)
Mahurkar v. C.R. Bard, Inc., 79 F.3d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., 976 F.2d 700 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
Manville Sales Corp. v. Paramount Sys., 917 F.2d 544 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
Martin's Herend Imports, Inc. v. Diamond & Gem Trading USA, Co., 112 F.3d 1296 (5th Cir. 1997)
Maxwell v. J. Baker, Inc., 86 F.3d 1098 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
McNeilab, Inc. v. Scandipharm, Inc., 1996 WL 431352 (Fed. Cir. July 31, 1996), rev'g 862 F. Supp. 1351 (E.D. Pa. 1994)
Memphis Community Sch. Dist. v. Stachura, 477 U.S. 299 (1986)
Micro-Acoustics Corp. v. Bose Corp., 493 F. Supp. 356 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)
MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 259 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (C.D. Cal. 2003)
Money Store v. Harriscorp Fin., Inc., 689 F.2d 666 (7th Cir 1982)
Moore v. Marsh, 74 U.S. 515 (1868)
Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. 537 U.S. 418 (2003)
Motorola, Inc. v. Varo, Inc., 656 F. Supp. 716 (N.D. Tex. 1986)
N. A. S. Import, Corp. v. Chenson Enters., Inc., 968 F.2d 250 (2d Cir. 1992)
National Bd. of Young Women's Christian Ass'n v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n, 335 F. Supp. 615 (D.S.C. 1971)
National Lampoon, Inc. v. American Broad. Cos., 376 F. Supp. 733 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)
New York Times Co. v. Tasini, 533 U.S. 483 (2001)
Nichols v. Universal Pictures Corp., 45 F.2d 119 (2d Cir. 1930)
Nike Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 138 F.3d 1437 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
Oiness v. Walgreen Co., 88 F.3d 1025 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Genetics Inst., Inc., 52 F.3d 1026 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U.S. 103 (1990)
Overman Cushion Tire Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 59 F.2d 998 (2d Cir. 1932)
Pall Corp. v. Micron Separations, Inc., 66 F.3d 1211 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co., 162 N.E. 99 (N. Y. 1928)
Panavision Int'l, L.P. v. Toeppen, 141 F.3d 1316 (9th Cir. 1998)
Panavision Int'l, L.P. v. Toeppen, 141 F.3d 1316 (9th Cir. 1998), aff'g 938 F. Supp. 616 (C.D. Cal. 1996)
Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc., 575 F.2d 1152 (6th Cir. 1978)
Paper Converting Mach. Co. v. Magna-Graphics Corp., 745 F.2d 11 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322 (1979)
Parkson Corp. v. Fruit of the Loom Inc., 28 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1066 (E.D. Ark. 1992)
Peer Int'l Corp. v. Luna Records, Inc., 887 F. Supp. 560 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)
Pennsalt Chems. Corp. v. Dravo Corp., 240 F. Supp. 837 (E.D. Pa. 1965)
Pfizer, Inc. v. Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corp., 812 F. Supp. 1352 (D. Del. 1993)
Philp v. Nock, 84 U.S. 460 (1873)
Pitts v. Hall, 19 F. Cas. 754 (C.C.N.D.N.Y. 1851)
Pope Mfg. Co. v. Gormully & Jeffery Mfg. Co., 144 U.S. 248 (1892)
PPX Enters. v. Audiofidelity, Inc., 746 F.2d 120 (2d Cir. 1984)
Pritikin v. Liberation Publications, Inc., 83 F. Supp. 2d 920 (N.D. Ill. 1999)
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Paragon Trade Brands, Inc., 989 F. Supp. 547 (D. Del. 1997)
Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson, 390 U.S. 102 (1968)
Quabaug Rubber Co. v. Fabiano Shoe Co., 567 F.2d 154 (1st Cir. 1977)
Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Prods. Co., 514 U.S. 159 (1995)
Radio Steel & Mfg. Co. v. MTD Prods., Inc., 788 F.2d 1554 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
Rainville Co. v. Consupak, Inc., 407 F. Supp. 221 (D.N.J. 1976)
Read Corp. v. Portec, Inc., 970 F.2d 816 (Fed. Cir. 1992)
Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Netcom On-Line Commun. Servs., 907 F. Supp. 1361 (N.D. Cal. 1995)
Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., 56 F.3d 1538 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
Rosso & Mastracco, Inc. v. Giant Food Inc., 720 F.2d 1263 (Fed. Cir. 1983)
Rude v. Westcott, 130 U.S. 152 (1889)
Rutherford v. Trim-Tex, Inc., 803 F. Supp. 158 (N.D. Ill. 1992)
Schneider (Europe) AG v. Scimed Life Sys., Inc., 852 F. Supp. 813 (D. Minn. 1994), aff'd mem., 60 F.3d 839 (Fed. Cir. 1995)
SecuraComm Consulting Inc. v. Securacom Inc., 166 F.3d 182 (3rd Cir. 1999)
Selle v. Gibb, 741 F.2d 896 (7th Cir. 1984)
Sessions v. Romadka, 145 U.S. 29 (1892)
Seymour v. McCormick, 57 U.S. 480 (1853)
Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp., 81 F.2d 49 (2d Cir. 1936)
Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures, 106 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1939)
Shields-Jetco Inc. v. Torti, 314 F. Supp. 1292 (D.R.I. 1970), aff'd on other grounds, 436 F.2d 1061 (1st Cir. 1971)
Slimfold Mfg. Co. v. Kinkead Indus., 932 F.2d 1453 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corp., 926 F.2d 1161 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
Snellman v. Ricoh Co., 862 F.2d 283 (Fed. Cir. 1988)
Songmaker v. Forward of Kansas, Inc., No. 90-4156-SAC, 1993 WL 484210 (D. Kan. 1993)
Sony Corp. of Am. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 (1984)
SRI Int'l, Inc., v. Advanced Tech. Labs, Inc., 127 F.3d 1462 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
Stabilisierungsfonds Fur Wein v. Kaiser Stuhl Wine Distributors Pty., Ltd., 647 F.2d 200 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969)
State Indus., Inc. v. Mor-Flo Indus., Inc., 883 F.2d 1573 (Fed. Cir. 1989)
Stryker Corp. v. Intermedics Orthopedics, Inc., 891 F. Supp. 751, 825–32 (E.D.N.Y. 1995), aff'd, 96 F.3d 1409 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
STX, Inc. v. Bauer USA Inc., 43 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1492 (N.D. Cal. 1997)
Tap Publications, Inc. v. Chinese Yellow Pages (N. Y.) Inc., 925 F. Supp. 212 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
Taylor v. Meirick, 712 F.2d 1112 (7th Cir. 1983)
Tec Air, Inc. v. Denso Mfg. Mich. Inc., 192 F.3d 1353 (Fed. Cir. 1999)
Textile Productions, Inc. v. Mead Corp., 134 F.3d 1481 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
The Paper-Bag Cases, 105 U.S. 766 (1881)
Thomas v. American Cystoscope Makers, Inc., 414 F. Supp. 255 (E.D. Pa. 1976)
Toys “R” Us, Inc. v. Akkaoui, 40 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1836 (N.D. Cal. 1996)
Traditional Living, Inc. v. Energy Log Homes, Inc., 464 F. Supp. 1024 (N.D. Ala. 1978)
Trell v. Marlee Elecs. Corp., 912 F.2d 1443 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
Tri-Star Pictures, Inc. v. Leisure Time Prods., B.V., 749 F. Supp. 1243 (S.D.N.Y. 1990), aff'd, 17 F.3d 38 (2d Cir. 1994)
Trussell Mfg. Co. v. Wilson-Jones Co., 50 F.2d 1027 (2d Cir. 1931)
Twin Peaks Prods., Inc. v. Publications Int'l, Ltd., 996 F.2d 1366 (2d Cir. 1993)
TWM Manufacturing Co. v. Dura Corp., 789 F.2d 895 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
Ty, Inc. v. GMA Accessories, Inc., 132 F.3d 1167 (7th Cir. 1997)
Tycom Corp. v. Redactron Corp., 380 F. Supp. 1183 (D. Del. 1974)
Tyler v. Tuel, 10 U.S. 324 (1810)
United States v. Elcom Ltd., 203 F. Supp. 2d 1111 (N.D. Cal. 2002)
United States Football League v. National Football League, 644 F. Supp. 1040 (S.D.N.Y. 1986), aff'd, 842 F.2d 1335 (2d Cir. 1988)
Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley, 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001)
Vaupel Textilmaschinen KG v. Meccanica Euro Italia, S.p.A., 944 F.2d 870 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
Velo-Bind, Inc. v. Minn. Mining & Mfg. Co., 647 F.2d 965 (9th Cir. 1981)
Video Aided Instruction, Inc. v. Y & S Express, Inc., No. 96- CV-518-CBA, 1996 WL 711513 (E.D.N.Y. 1996)
Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Dreer, 224 F. Supp. 744 (E.D. Pa. 1963)
W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. v. Intercat, Inc., 60 F. Supp. 2d 316 (D. Del. 1999)
W. L. Gore & Assocs. v. Carlisle Corp., 198 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 353 (D. Del. 1978)
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros. Co., 529 U.S. 205 (2000)
Waldman Publ'g Corp. v. Landoll, Inc., 43 F.3d 775 (2d Cir. 1994)
Walt Disney Co. v. Video 47 Inc., 40 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1747 (S.D. Fla. 1996)
Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chem. Co., 520 U.S. 17 (1997)
Waterman v. Mackenzie, 138 U.S. 252 (1891)
Weinar v. Rollform Inc., 744 F.2d 797 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
Western Elec. Co. v. Pacent Reproducer Corp., 42 F.2d 116 (2d Cir. 1930)
Wildlife Express Corp. v. Carol Wright Sales, Inc., 18 F.3d 502 (7th Cir. 1994)
Wilson v. Rousseau, 45 U.S. 646 (1846)
Wine Ry. Appliance Co. v. Enter. Ry. Equip. Co., 297 U.S. 387 (1936)
Woods v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 920 F. Supp. 62 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. Sargent, 117 U.S. 536 (1886)
Zazu Designs v. L'Oreal, S.A., 979 F.2d 499 (7th Cir. 1992)
Zenix Indus. USA, Inc. v. King Hwa Indus. Co., No. 88–5760, 1990 WL 200234 (9th Cir. Oct. 3, 1990)
American Intellectual Property Law Association, Report of the Economic Survey (2003)
Abramowicz, Michael, Perfecting Patent Prizes, 56 Vand. L. Rev.115 (2003)Google Scholar
Addanki, Sumanth, Economics and Patent Damages: A Practical Guide, 532 PLI/Pat845 (1998)Google Scholar
Adelman, Martin J., Property Rights Theory and Patent-Antitrust: The Role of Compulsory Licensing, 52 NYU L. Rev.977 (1977)Google Scholar
Adelstein, Richard P. & Peretz, Steven I., The Competition of Technologies in Markets for Ideas: Copyright and Fair Use in Evolutionary Perspective, 5 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ.209 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akerlof, George A.The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, 84 Q. J. Econ.488 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, John R. & Lemley, Mark A., Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents, 26 AIPLA Q. J.185(1998)Google Scholar
Anderson, David A., Reputation, Compensation, and Proof, 25 Wm. & Mary L. Rev.747 (1984)Google Scholar
Aron, Debra J. & Wildman, Steven S., Economic Theories of Tying and Foreclosure Applied-and Not Applied-in Microsoft, 14 Antitrust48 (Fall 1999)Google Scholar
Kenneth J. Arrow, Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (1962)
Ayres, Ian & Klemperer, Paul, Limiting Patentees' Market Power Without Reducing Innovation Incentives: The Perverse Benefits of Uncertainty and Non-Injunctive Remedies, 97 Mich. L. Rev.985 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, Ian & Talley, Eric, Solomonic Bargaining: Dividing a Legal Entitlement to Facilitate Coasean Trade, 104 Yale L. J.1027, (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Margreth, Functionality, 61 Wash. & Lee L. Rev.79 (2004)Google Scholar
Beck, Roger L., The Prospect Theory of the Patent System and Unproductive Competition, 5 Res. L. & Econ.193 (1983)Google Scholar
Bell, Tom W., Fair Use vs. Fared Use: The Impact of Automated Rights Management on Copyright's Fair Use Doctrine, 76 N. C. L. Rev.557 (1998)Google Scholar
Bertrand, Joseph, Theorie Mathematique de la Richesse Sociale, 67 Journal des Savants499 (1883)Google Scholar
Bessy, Christian & Brousseau, Eric, Technology Licensing Contracts Features and Diversity, 18 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ.451 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John M. Blair, Economic Concentration (1972)
Blair, Roger D. & Kaserman, David L., A Note on Dual Input Monopoly and Tying, 10 Economics Leters494 (1982)Google Scholar
Roger D. Blair & Lawrence W. Kenny, Microeconomics for Managerial Decision Making (1982)
Blair, Roger D. & Cotter, Thomas F., An Economic Analysis of Damages Rules in Intellectual Property Law, 39 Wm. & Mary L. Rev.1585 (1998)Google Scholar
Blair, Roger D. & Cotter, Thomas F., The Elusive Logic of Standing Doctrine in Intellectual Property Law, 74 Tulane L. Rev.1323 (2000)Google Scholar
Blair, Roger D. & Cotter, Thomas F., Rethinking Patent Damages, 10 Tex. Intell. Prop. L. J.1 (2001)Google Scholar
Blair, Roger D. & Cotter, Thomas F., An Economic Analysis of Seller and User Liability in Intellectual Property Law, 68 U. Cin. L. Rev.1 (1999)Google Scholar
Blair, Roger D. & Page, William H., “Speculative” Antitrust Damages, 70 Wash. L. Rev.423 (1995)Google Scholar
Boldrin, Michele & Levine, David K., The Case Against Intellectual Property, 92 Am. Econ. Rev.209–12 (May 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bone, Robert G., A New Look at Trade Secret Law: Doctrine in Search of Justification, 86 Calif. L. Rev.241 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, Terry R., The Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995-Does It Address the Dilution Doctrine's Most Serious Problems?, 7 DePaul-LCA J. Art & Ent. L.75 (1996)Google Scholar
Borchard, William M., Reverse Passing Off-Commercial Robbery or Permissible Competition?, 67 Trademark Rep.1 (1977)Google Scholar
Robert H. Bork, The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself (1976)
Bowman, Ward S., Tying Arrangements and the Leverage Problem, 67 Yale L. J.19 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burk, Dan L. and Lemley, Mark A., Is Patent Law Technology-Specific?, 17 Berkeley Tech. L. J.1155 (2002)Google Scholar
Burk, Dan L., Muddy Rules for Cyberspace, 21 Cardozo L. Rev.121 (1999)Google Scholar
Burk, Dan L., Patenting Speech, 79 Tex. L. Rev.99 (2000)Google Scholar
Burk, Dan L., The Trouble with Trespass, 4 J. Small & Emerging Bus. L.27 (2000)Google Scholar
Dennis W. Carlton & Jeffrey M. Perloff, Modern Industrial Organization (3d ed., 2000)
Carter, Stephen L., The Trouble with Trademark, 99 Yale L. J.759 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph Cassady, Jr., Auctions and Auctioneering (1967)
Caves, Richard E. et al., The Imperfect Market for Technology Licenses, 45 Oxford Bull. Econ. & Stat.249 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edward H. Chamberlin, The Theory of Monopolistic Competition (8th ed. 1962)
Chin, Yee Wah, Unilateral Technology Suppression: Appropriate Antitrust and Patent Law Remedies, 66 Antitrust L. J.441 (1998)Google Scholar
Donald S. Chisum, Chisum on Patents (2002)
Jay, Pil Choi, Patent Litigation as an Information-Transmission Mechanism, 88 Am. Econ. Rev.1249 (1998)Google Scholar
Ciolino, Dane S. & Donelon, Erin A., Questioning Strict Liability in Copyright, 54 Rutgers L. Rev.351 (2002)Google Scholar
Coase, R. H., The Lighthouse in History, 17 J. L. Econ.357 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, R. H., The Problem of Social Cost, 3 J. L. Econ.1 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Joel M. & Burke, Arthur J., An Overview of the Antitrust Analysis of Suppression of Technology, 66 Antitrust L. J.421 (1998)Google Scholar
Cohen, Julie E., Lochner in Cyberspace: The New Economic Orthodoxy of “Rights Management”, 97 Mich. L. Rev.462 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Julie E. & Lemley, Mark A., Patent Scope and Innovation in the Software Industry, 89 Calif. L. Rev.1 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesley M. Cohen et al., Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (Or Not), NBER Working Paper No. 7552 (Feb. 2000)
Colb, Sherry F., The Qualitative Dimension of Fourth Amendment “Reasonableness”, 98 Colum. L. Rev.1642 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules L. & Kraus, Jody, Rethinking the Theory of Legal Rights, 95 Yale L. J.335 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conigliaro, Matthew J. et al., Foreseeability in Patent Law, 16 Berkeley Tech. L. J.1045 (2001)Google Scholar
Conley, Ned L., An Economic Approach to Patent Damages, 15 AIPLA Q. J.354 (1987)Google Scholar
Robert Cooter & Thomas Ulen, Law and Economics (1988)
Carlos M. Correa & Abdulqawi A. Yusuf, Intellectual Property and International Trade, The TRIPs Agreement (1998)
Carlos M. Correa, Intellectual Property Rights, the WTO and Developing Countries (2000)
Coombe, Rosemary J., Objects of Property and Subjects of Politics: Intellectual Property Laws and Democratic Dialogue, 69 Tex. L. Rev.1853 (1991)Google Scholar
Cotter, Thomas F., Conflicting Interests in Trade Secrets, 48 48591 (1996)Google Scholar
Cotter, Thomas F., Do Federal Uses of Intellectual Property Implicate the Fifth Amendment?, 50 Fla. L. Rev.529 (1998)Google Scholar
Thomas F. Cotter, An Economic Analysis of Enhanced Damages and Attorneys' Fees for Willful Patent Infringement, 14 Federal Circuit Bar Journal (forthcoming 2004)
Cotter, Thomas F., Gutenberg's Legacy: Copyright, Censorship, and Religious Pluralism, 91 Calif. L. Rev.323 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotter, Thomas F., Intellectual Property and the Essential Facilities Doctrine, 44 Antitrust Bull.211 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotter, Thomas F., Owning What Doesn't Exist, Where it Doesn't Exist: Rethinking Two Doctrines from the Common Law of Trademarks, 1995 U. Ill. L. Rev.487 (1995)Google Scholar
Cotter, Thomas F., Pragmatism, Economics, and the Droit Moral, 76 N. C. L. Rev.1 (1997)Google Scholar
Cotter, Thomas F., Market Fundamentalism and the TRIPs Agreement, 22 Cardozo Arts & Enter. L. J.307 (2004)Google Scholar
Augustin A. Cournot, Recherches sur les Principes Mathematiques de la Theorie des Richesses (1838)
Coury, Larry, C'est What? Saisie! A Comparison of Patent Infringement Remedies Among the G7 Economic Nations, 13 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L. J.1053 (2003)Google Scholar
Cox, Alan J., Antitrust and Intellectual Property Market Definition, 524 PLI/Pat129 (1998)Google Scholar
Craswell, Richard, Deterrence and Damags: The Multiplier Principle and its Alternatives, 97 Mich. L. Rev.2185 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craswell, Richard & Calfee, John E., Deterrence and Uncertain Legal Standards, 2 J. L. Econ. & Org.279 (1986)Google Scholar
Crew, Eugene, Foreword: Symposium on Antitrust and the Suppression of Technology in the United States and Europe: Is There a Remedy?, 66 Antitrust L. J.415 (1998)Google Scholar
George Ticknor Curtis, A Treatise on the Law of Patents for Useful Inventions: As Enacted and Administered in the United States (3d ed. 1867)
Dam, Kenneth W., The Economic Underpinnings of Patent Law, 23 J. Legal Stud.247 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, Harold, When Does the Rule of Liability Matter?, 1 J. Legal Stud.13 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denicola, Robert C., Trademarks as Speech: Constitutional Implications of the Emerging Rationales for the Protection of Trade Symbols, Wis. L. Rev.158 (1982)
Director, Aaron & Levi, Edward H., Law and the Future: Trade Regulation, 51 Nw. U. L. Rev.281 (1956)Google Scholar
Dan B. Dobbs, Law of Remedies (2d ed. 1993)
Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper, Dethroning Lear: Licensee Estoppel and the Incentive to Innovate, 72 Va. L. Rev.677 (1986)CrossRef
Einhorn, Michael A., Copyright, Prevention, and Rational Governance: File-Sharing and Napster, 24 Colum.-VLA J. L. & Arts449 (2001)Google Scholar
Elkin-Koren, Niva & Salzberger, Eli M., Law and Economics in Cyberspace, 19 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ.553 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, David S., Market Definition in Antitrust and Patent Litigation, 414 PLI/Pat595 (1995)Google Scholar
Feldman, Joel R., Note, Reverse Confusion in Trademarks: Balancing the Interests of the Public, the Trademark Owner, and the Infringer, 8 J. Tech. L. & Pol'y163 (2003)Google Scholar
Fisher, William W. III, Reconstructing the Fair Use Doctrine, 101 Harv. L. Rev.1659, (1988)Google Scholar
Friedman, David D. et al., Some Economics of Trade Secret Law, 5 J. Econ. Perspectives61 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudenberg, Drew et al., Preemption, Leapfrogging and Competition in Patent Races, 22 Eur. Econ. Rev.3 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallini, Nancy T., Patent Policy and Costly Imitation, 23 RAND J. Econ.52 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallini, Nancy T. & Wright, Brian D., Technology Transfer Under Asymmetric Information, 21 Rand J. Econ.147 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard J. Gilbert, Patents, Sleeping Patents, and Entry Deterrence, in Strategy, Predation, and Antitrust Analysis (Steven C. Salop ed., 1981)
Gilbert, Richard J. & Katz, Michael L., Perspectives on Intellectual Property: When Good Value Chains Go Bad: The Economics of Indirect Liability for Copyright Infringement, 52 Hastings L. J.961 (2001)Google Scholar
Gilbert, Richard J. & Newbery, David M. G., Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly, 72 Am. Econ. Rev.514 (1982)Google Scholar
Gilbert, Richard J. & Sunshine, Steven C., Incorporating Dynamic Efficiency Concerns in Merger Analysis: The Use of Innovation Markets, 63 Antitrust L. J.569 (1995)Google Scholar
Paul Goldstein, Copyright (2d ed. 2002)
Paul Goldstein, Copyright's Highway: From Gutenberg to the Celestial Jukebox (Hill & Wang 1994)
Wendy J. Gordon, Excuse and Justification in the Law of Fair Use: Commodification and Market Perspectives, in The Commodification of Information (Niva Elkin-Koren & Neil Weinstock Netanel eds., 2002)
Gordon, Wendy J., Fair Use as Market Failure: A Structural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and its Predecessors, 82 Colum. L. Rev.1600 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, Mark F. & Alexander, Jay I., Patent Law and Rent Dissipation, 78 Va. L. Rev.305 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Bronwyn H. & Ziedonis, Rosemarie Ham, The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979–1995, 32 Rand J. Econ.101 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, I. Trotter, The Ancient Doctrine of Trespass to Web Sites, 1996 J. Online L. art.7 (1996)Google Scholar
Heald, Paul J., Comment, Money Damages and Corrective Advertising: An Economic Analysis, 55 U. Chi. L. Rev.629 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heald, Paul J., Payment Demands for Spurious Copyrights: Four Causes of Action, 1 J. Intell. Prop. L.259 (1994)Google Scholar
Heines, M. Henry, Indispensable Parties in Patent Litigation, 58 J. Pat. Off. Soc'y232 (1976)Google Scholar
Heller, Michael A. & Eisenberg, Rebecca S., Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research, 280 Science698 (1998)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holman, Molly A. & Munzer, Stephen R., Intellectual Property Rights in Genes and Gene Fragments: A Registration Solution for Expressed Sequence Tags, 85 Iowa L. Rev.735 (2000)Google ScholarPubMed
Ethan Horwitz & Lester Horwitz, Patent Litigation: Procedure & Tactics (2001)
Janicke, Paul M., Contemporary Issues in Patent Damages, 42 Am. U. L. Rev.691 (1993)Google Scholar
Jarosz, John C. & Page, Erin M., The Panduit Lost Profits Test After BIC Leisure v. Windsurfing, 3 Fed. Cir. B. J.311 (1993)Google Scholar
Kalos, Stephen H. & Putnam, Jonathan D., On the Incomparability of “Comparable”: An Economic Interpretation of “Infringer's Royalties”, 9 No.4J. Proprietary Rts.2 (1997)Google Scholar
Karp, Larry S. & Perloff, Jeffrey M., The Optimal Suppression of a Low-Cost Technology by a Durable-Good Monopoly, 27 Rand J. Econ.346 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Michael L. & Shapiro, Carl, How to License Intangible Property, 101 Q. J. Econ.567 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyes, Jeffrey J. et al., Tying, Exclusive Dealing, and Franchising Issues, 1117 PLI/Corp.9 (1999)Google Scholar
Kieff, F. Scott, Property Rights and Property Rules for Commercializing Inventions, 85 Minn. L. Rev.697 (2000)Google Scholar
F. Scott Kieff, The Case for Registering Patents and the Law and Economics of Present Patent-Obtaining Rules (in draft 2003)
Kitch, Edmund W., Can the Internet Shrink Fair Use?, 78 Neb. L. Rev.880 (1999)Google Scholar
Kitch, Edmund W., The Nature and Function of the Patent System, 20 J. L. & Econ.265 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin Klein et al., The Economics of Copyright “Fair Use” in a Networked World, 92 Am. Econ. Rev. (Papers and Proceedings) 205 (May 2002)
Koegel, John B., Bamboozlement: The Repeal of Copyright Registration Incentives, 13 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L. J.529 (1995)Google Scholar
Kozinski, Alex, Trademarks Unplugged, 68 N.Y.U.L. Rev.960 (1993)Google Scholar
Krosin, Kenneth E. & Kozlowski, Holly D., Patent Damages, 300 PLI/Pat53 (1990)Google Scholar
Ku, Raymond Shih Ray, The Creative Destruction of Copyright: Napster and the New Economics of Digital Technology, 69 U. Chi. L. Rev.263 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, William M., Optimal Sanctions for Antitrust Violations, 50 U. Chi. L. Rev.652 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, William M. & Posner, Richard A., Causation in Tort Law: An Economic Approach, 12 J. Legal Stud.109 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, William M. & Posner, Richard A., An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law, 18 J. Legal Stud.325 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
William M. Landes & Richard A. Posner, The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law (2003)
William M. Landes & Richard A. Posner, The Economic Structure of Tort Law (1987)
William M. Landes & Richard A. Posner, Indefinitely Renewable Copyright, 70 U. Chi. L. Rev. 471 (2003)
Lee, William F. et al., When an Exclusive License Is Not an Exclusive License: The Standing of “Exclusive” Patent Licensees to Sue After Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Genetics Institute, Inc., 7 Fed. Circuit B. J.1 (1997)Google Scholar
Leibovitz, John S., Note, Inventing a Nonexclusive Patent System, 111 Yale L. J.2251 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemley, Mark A., The Economics of Improvement in Intellectual Property Law, 75 Tex. L. Rev.989 (1997)Google Scholar
Lemley, Mark A. & McGowan, David, Legal Implications of Network Economic Effects, 86 Calif. L. Rev.479 (May 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemley, Mark A., Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office, 95 Nw. U. L. Rev.1495 (2001)Google Scholar
Lemley, Mark A. & Volokh, Eugene, Freedom of Speech and Injunctions in Intellectual Property Cases, 48 Duke L. J.147 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Richard C. et al., Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development, 3 Brookings Papers on Economic Activity783 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtman, Douglas Gary, The Economics of Innovation: Protecting Unpatentable Goods, 81 Minn. L. Rev.693 (1997)Google Scholar
Lichtman, Douglas & Landes, William, Indirect Liability for Copyright Infringement: An Economic Perspective, 16 Harv. J. Law & Tech.395 (2003)Google Scholar
Lidsky, Lyrissa Barnett, Defamation, Reputation, and the Myth of Community, 71 Wash. L. Rev.1 (1996)Google Scholar
Litman, Jessica, The Exclusive Right to Read, 13 Cardozo Arts & Enter. L. J.29 (1994)Google Scholar
Long, Clarisa, Patent Signals, 69 U. Chi. L. Rev.625 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunney, Glynn S. Jr., The Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 87 Va. L. Rev.813 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Charles C., Who Will Own Your Next Good Idea, Atlantic Monthly57 (Sept. 1998)Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edwin et al., Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study, 91 Econ. J.907 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markarian, James M., Can the Marking Requirements for a Patented Article Be Circumvented by Obtaining a Process Patent?, 17 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y365 (1997)Google Scholar
Maurer, Stephen M. & Scotchmer, Suzanne, The Independent Invention Defense in Intellectual Property, 69 Economica535 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J. Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition (4th ed. 2003)
McFetridge, Donald G. & Smith, Douglas A., Patents, Prospects, and Economic Surplus: A Comment, 23 J. Law & Econ.197 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meese, Alan J., Tying Meets the New Institutional Economics: Farewell to the Chimera of Forcing, 146 U. Pa. L. Rev.1 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, Michael J., The Patent Marking and Notice Statute: A Question of “Fact” or “Act”?, 9 Harv. J. L. & Tech.429 (1996)Google Scholar
Merges, Robert P., Contracting into Liability Rules: Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organizations, 84 Cal. L. Rev.1293, 1296 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merges, Robert P., Intellectual Property Rights and Bargaining Breakdown: The Case of Blocking Patents, 62 Tenn. L. Rev.75 (1994)Google Scholar
Robert P. Merges, Patent Law and Policy: Cases and Materials 1097 (2d ed. 1997)
Merges, Robert P., Rent Control in the Patent District: Observations on the Grady-Alexander Thesis, 78 Va. L. Rev.359 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merges, Robert P. & Nelson, Richard R., On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope”, 90 Colum. L. Rev.839 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, David J., Patent Marking Statute May Need Major Overhaul, Nat'l L. J., Dec. 24, 2001, at C5Google Scholar
Roger M. Milgrim, Milgrim on Licensing (2003)
James William Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice (3d ed. 1999)
Moore, Kimberly A., Judges, Juries, and Patent Cases – An Empirical Peek Inside the Black Box, 99 Mich. L. Rev.365 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Preston & Nakamura, Jackie, The United States Patent Marking and Notice Statute, 22 AIPLA Q. J.85 (1994)Google Scholar
Nance, Dale A., Guidance Rules and Enforcement Rules: A Better View of the Cathedral, 83 Va. L. Rev.837 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry Nalebuff, Bundling (November 22, 1999). Yale ICF Working Paper Series No. 99–14. (available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=185193)
Netanel, Neil Weinstock, Copyright and a Democratic Civil Society, 106 Yale L. J.283 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter Nicholson, Microeconomic Theory (5th ed. 1992)
Nimmer, David, Copyright in the Dead Sea Scrolls: Authorship and Originality, 38 Hous. L. Rev.1 (2001)Google Scholar
Melville B. Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright (2003)
Markus Nolff, TRIPs, PCT and Global Patent Procurement (2001)
Note, , Trade Secret Misappropriation: A Cost-Benefit Response to the Fourth Amendment Analogy, 106 Harv. L. Rev.461 (1992)Google Scholar
Ogburn, William F. & Thomas, Dorothy, Are Inventions Inevitable? A Note on Social Evolution, 37 Pol. Sci. Q.83 (1922)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppedahl, Carl, Patent Marking of Systems, 11 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L. J.205 (1995)Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Maureen, Fencing Cyberspace: Drawing Borders in a Vertical World, 82 Minn. L. Rev.609 (1998)Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Maureen, Toward a Doctrine of Fair Use in Patent Law, 100 Colum. L. Rev.1177 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parchomovsky, Gideon & Siegelman, Peter, Towards an Integrated Theory of Intellectual Property, 88 Va. L. Rev.1455 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
William F. Patry, The Fair Use Privilege in Copyright Law (1985)
Perlmutter, Shira, Freeing Copyright from Formalities, 13 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L. J.565 (1995)Google Scholar
Pincus, Laura B., The Computation of Damages in Patent Infringement Actions, 5 595 (1991)Google Scholar
Robert S. Pindyck & Daniel L. Rubinfeld, Microeconomics (4th ed. 1998)
Posner, Richard A., An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law, 85 Colum. L. Rev.1193 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard A. Posner, Economic Analysis of Law (4th ed. 1992)
Priest, George L., What Economists Can Tell Lawyers About Intellectual Property: Comment on Cheung, 8 Res. L. & Econ.19 (1986)Google Scholar
Rabowsky, Brent, Note, Recovery of Lost Profits on Unpatented Products in Patent Infringement Cases, 70 S. Cal. L. Rev.281 (1996)Google Scholar
Reese, R. Anthony, The Public Display Right: The Copyright Act's Neglected Solution to the Controversy Over RAM “Copies”, 2001 U. Ill. L. Rev.83
Reichman, J. H., Legal Hybrids Between the Patent and Copyright Paradigms, 94 Colum. L. Rev.2432 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennifer F. Reinganum, The Timing of Innovation: Research, Development, and Diffusion, Handbook of Industrial Organization (Richard Schmalensee & Robert D. Willig eds., 1989)
Reinganum, Jennifer F., Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly, 73 Am. Econ. Rev.741 (1983)Google Scholar
Edward W. Remus et al., Prerequisites to Recovery of Damages: Importance of Marking and Notice of Infringement, CA15 ALI-ABA 413 (Nov. 9, 1995)
William C. Robinson, The Law of Patents for Useful Inventions (1890)
Rowley, Fred Anthony Jr., Note, Dynamic Copyright Law: Its Problems and a Possible Solution, 11Harv. J. L. & Tech.481 (1991)Google Scholar
Salant, Stephen, Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly: Comment, 74 Am. Econ. Rev.247 (1984)Google Scholar
F. M. Scherer, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (2d ed. 1980)
F. M. Scherer et al., Patents and the Corporation: A Report on Industrial Technology Under Changing Public Policy (2d ed. 1959)
F. M. Scherer, Competition Policy, Domestic and International (Edward Elgar 2000)
John W. Schlicher, Licensing Intellectual Property: Legal, Business, and Market Dynamics (1996)
Schlicher, John W., Measuring Patent Damages by the Market Value of Inventions – The Grain Processing, Rite-Hite, and Aro Rules, 82 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'503 (2000)Google Scholar
John W. Schlicher, Patent Law: Legal and Economic Principles (2002)
Suzanne Scotchmer, Incentives to Innovate, in Palgrave Encyclopedia of Law & Economics 273 (1998)
Scotchmer, Suzanne, Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law, J. Econ. Persp. (Winter 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seberoff, Steven C., New Requirements in Patent Marking and Notice, 76 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y793 (1994)Google Scholar
Shapiro, Carl, Antitrust Limits to Patent Settlements, 34 Rand J. Econ. (forthcoming 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, Steven, An Analysis of Causation and the Scope of Liability in the Law of Torts, 9 J. Legal Stud.463 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherry, Edward F. & Teece, David W., Some Economic Aspects of Intellectual Property Damages, 573 PLI/Pat399 (1999)Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert, Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science, 49 Am. Econ. Rev.253, (1959)Google Scholar
John M. Skenyon et al., Patent Damages Law & Practice (2002)
Sterk, Stewart E., Rhetoric and Reality in Copyright Law, 94 Mich. L. Rev.1197 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Marion B., Calculating Economic Damages in Intellectual Property Disputes: The Role of Market Definition, 77 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y321 (1995)Google Scholar
Strickland, J. Michael, Note, Nonexclusive Patent Licensees Unite: Use Bankruptcy Committees to Sue for Patent Infringement, 48 Duke L. J.571 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
C. T. Taylor & Z. A. Silbertson, The Economic Impact of the Patent System (1973)
Thurmon, Mark A., The Rise and Fall of Trademark Law's Functionality Defense, 56 Fla. L. Rev.243 (forthcoming 2004)Google Scholar
Jean Tirole, The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988)
D. C. Toedt, The Law and Business of Computer Software (1998)
Turner, Julie S., Comment, The Nonmanufacturing Patent Owner: Toward a Theory of Efficient Infringement, 86 Cal. L. Rev.179 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, John, Pre-Emptive Patenting, Joint Ventures, and the Persistence of Oligopoly, 3 Int'l J. Indus. Org.261 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voelzke, Joel, Patent Marking Under 35 U.S.C. 287(a): Products, Processes, and the Deception of the Public, 5 Fed. Cir. B. J.317 (1995)Google Scholar
R. Polk Wagner, (Mostly) Against Exceptionalism (2002 draft)
Wagner, R. Polk, Reconsidering Estoppel: Patent Administration and the Failure of Festo, 151 U. Pa. L. Rev.159 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard Watt, Copyright and Economic Theory: Friends or Foes? (2000)
Werden, Gregory J. et al., Economic Analysis of Lost Profits from Patent Infringement With and Without Noninfringing Substitutes, 27 AIPLA Q. J.305 (1999)Google Scholar
Weston, Ray D. Jr., A Comparative Analysis of the Doctrine of Equivalents: Can European Approaches Solve an American Dilemma?, 39 IDEA35 (1998)Google Scholar
Whinston, Michael D., Tying, Foreclosure, and Exclusion, 80 Am. Econ. Rev.837 (1990)Google Scholar
James J. White & Robert S. Summers, Uniform Commercial Code (4th ed. 1995)
Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure (3d ed. 2002)
Yamamoto, Shusato & Tessensohn, John A., Doctrine of Equivalents Adds Torque to Japanese Patent Infringement, 81 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc'y483 (1999)Google Scholar
Yen, Alfred C., What Federal Gun Control Can Teach Us About the DMCA's Anti-Trafficking Provisions, Wis. L. Rev.649 (2003)Google Scholar
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, art. 28, Legal Instruments – Results of the Uruguay Round vol. 31, 33 I.L.M. 1197 (1994)
House Report No. 79-1587 (1946), reprinted in 2 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1387 (1946)
House Report No. 94-1476, at 159, reprinted in 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 5775
House Report No. 104-556, reprinted in 996 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1074
ICANN, Uniform Domain Name Resolution Policy, http://www.icann.org/udrp/udrp-policy-24oct99.htm
Information Infrastructure Task Force, Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure: The Report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (1995)
The Protection of Utility Models in the Single Market: Green Paper from the Commission to the European Council, COM(95)370 final
Senate Report No. 79-1503 (1946), reprinted in 2 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1387 (1946)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Roger D. Blair, University of Florida, Thomas F. Cotter, University of Florida
  • Book: Intellectual Property
  • Online publication: 08 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614521.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Roger D. Blair, University of Florida, Thomas F. Cotter, University of Florida
  • Book: Intellectual Property
  • Online publication: 08 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614521.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Roger D. Blair, University of Florida, Thomas F. Cotter, University of Florida
  • Book: Intellectual Property
  • Online publication: 08 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614521.010
Available formats
×