Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T12:25:21.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Impacts of inbreeding on components of reproductive success

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2010

Karen Koeninger Ryan
Affiliation:
The University of Chicago, Committee on Evolutionary Biology, 1101 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A.
Robert C. Lacy
Affiliation:
The University of Chicago, Committee on Evolutionary Biology, 1101 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 and Department of Conservation Biology, Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, IL 60513, U.S.A.
Susan W. Margulis
Affiliation:
Department of Conservation Biology, Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, IL 60513, U.S.A.
William V. Holt
Affiliation:
Zoological Society of London
Amanda R. Pickard
Affiliation:
Zoological Society of London
John C. Rodger
Affiliation:
Marsupial CRC, New South Wales
David E. Wildt
Affiliation:
Smithsonian National Zoological Park, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Although inbreeding depression may reduce individual fitness at all life-history stages, empirical investigations have been largely limited to studies of juvenile survival in captive mammals. Numerous studies (e.g. Ralls et al., 1979; Ballou & Ralls, 1982; Ralls & Ballou, 1982; Ralls et al., 1988; Lacy et al., 1993, reviewed by Thornhill, 1993) have demonstrated a reduction in the survival of offspring produced by related mates. This narrow focus, however, has led some scientists (e.g. Shields, 1982) to speculate that inbreeding depression is less important than it appears from the size of the effects found. First, if some offspring will usually be lost due to sib–sib competition, losses due to inbreeding depression may not drastically affect the parent's fitness. Second, it is possible (but still largely untested) that inbreeding could result in enhancements to other components of fitness, thereby offsetting reductions in juvenile survival.

It is not clear, however, that inbreeding depression affects mainly juvenile life-history traits (Charlesworth & Charlesworth, 1987). Rather, the effects of inbreeding on early stages of reproduction and other adult life-history traits have been little investigated, especially in non-domesticated animals. Inbred individuals that survive to adulthood may still suffer reduced fitness via reduced adult survival, poor performance in mating competition, reduced fecundity and less capable parental care. The paucity of data regarding the effect of inbreeding on these adult traits may lead biologists to underestimate the total cost of inbreeding for sexually reproducing species.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ballou, J. & Ralls, K. (1982). Inbreeding and juvenile mortality in small populations of ungulates: a detailed analysis. Biological Conservation 24, 239–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, C. J. & Fitzsimmons, J. (1989). Kin recognition and mate choice in mice: fitness consequences of mating with kin. Animal Behaviour 38, 35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barone, M. A., Roelke, M. E., Howard, J., Brown, J. L., Anderson, A. E. & Wildt, D. E. (1994). Reproductive fitness of the male Florida panther: comparative studies of Felis concolor from Florida, Texas, Colorado, Chile, and North American Zoos. Journal of Mammalogy 75, 150–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, P. (1982). Optimal outbreeding. In Mate Choice (Ed. P. Bateson), pp. 257–277. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. (1987). Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18, 237–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. (1993). Comparison of inbreeding and outbreeding in hermaphroditic Areanta arbustorum (land snail). Heredity 71, 456–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. Murray, London
Dewsbury, D. (1982). Avoidance of incestuous breeding between siblings in two species of Peromyscus mice. Biology of Behavior 7, 157–169Google Scholar
Drickamer, L. C., Gowaty, P. A. & Holmes, C. M. (2000). Free female mate choice in house mice affects reproductive success and offspring viability and performance. Animal Behaviour 59, 371–378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farr, J. A. (1983). The inheritance of qualitative fitness traits in guppies, Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 37, 1193–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, D. J. C. & Michener, C. D. (Eds.) (1987). Kin Recognition in Animals. Wiley, New York
Frankel, O. H. & Soulé, M. E. (1981). Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Frankham, R. (1995). Inbreeding and extinction: a threshold effect. Conservation Biology 9, 792–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomendio, M., Cassinello, J. & Roldan, E. R. S. (2000). A comparative study of ejaculate traits in three endangered ungulates with different levels of inbreeding: fluctuating asymmetry as an indicator of reproductive and genetic stress. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267, 875–882CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hepper, P. (Ed) (1991). Kin Recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jiménez, J. A., Hughes, K. A., Alaks, G., Graham, L. & Lacy, R. C. (1994). An experimental study of inbreeding depression in a natural habitat. Science 266, 271–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, W. C. & Bruford, M. W. (1998). New perspectives on mate choice and the MHC. Heredity 80, 239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, B. (1990). The effect of relatedness on reproductive success and mate choice in the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus. Animal Behaviour 39, 264–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, L. F., Arcese, P., Smith, J. N. M., Hochachka, W. M. & Stearns, S. C. (1994). Selection against inbred song sparrows during a natural population bottleneck. Nature 372, 356–357CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krackow, S. & Matuschak, B. (1991). Mate choice for non-siblings in wild house mice: evidence from a choice test and a reproductive test. Ethology 88, 99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacy, R. C. (1993). Impacts of inbreeding in natural and captive populations of vertebrates: implications for conservation. Perspectives in Biology & Medicine 36, 480–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacy, R. C. (1997). Importance of genetic variation to the viability of mammalian populations. Journal of Mammalogy 78, 320–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacy, R. C. (2000). Considering threats to the viability of small populations using individual based models. Ecological Bulletin 48, 39–51Google Scholar
Lacy, R. C., Alaks, G. & Walsh, A. (1996). Hierarchical analysis of inbreeding depression in Peromyscus polionotus. Evolution 50, 2187–2200CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacy, R. C., Petric, A. M. & Warneke, M. (1993). Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in captive populations of wild species. In The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding (Ed. N. W. Thornhill), pp. 352–374. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Margulis, S. W. (1998a). Differential effects of inbreeding at juvenile and adult life history stages in Peromyscus polionotus. Journal of Mammalogy 79, 326–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margulis, S. W. (1998b). Relationships among parental inbreeding, parental behaviour and offspring viability in oldfield mice. Animal Behaviour 55, 427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margulis, S. W. & Altmann, J. (1997). Behavioural risk factors in the reproduction of inbred and outbred oldfield mice. Animal Behaviour 54, 397–408CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Margulis, S. W. & Walsh, A. (2002). The effects of inbreeding on testicular sperm concentration in Peromyscus polionotus. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 14, 63–67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard-Smith, J. (1956). Fertility, mating behavior, and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura. Journal of Genetics 54, 261–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, M. R. & Getz, L. L. (1981). Incest taboo between sibling Microtus ochrogaster. Journal of Mammalogy 62, 213–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLain, D. K. (1998). Non-genetic benefits of mate choice: fecundity enhancement and sexy sons. Animal Behaviour 55, 1191–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meagher, S., Penn, D. J. & Potts, W. (2000). Male–male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 97, 3324–3329CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, P. S., Glasner, J. & Hedrick, P. W. (1993). Inbreeding depression and male-mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 88, 29–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ober, C., Elias, S., Kostyu, D. D. & Hauck, W. W. (1992). Decreased fecundability in Hutterite couples sharing HLA-DR. American Journal of Human Genetics 50, 6–14Google ScholarPubMed
Pusey, A. & Wolff, M. (1996). Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11, 201–206CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ralls, K. & Ballou, J. (1982). Effects of inbreeding on infant mortality in captive primates. International Journal of Primatology 3, 491–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralls, K., Ballou, J. D. & Templeton, A. (1988). Estimates of lethal equivalents and the cost of inbreeding in mammals. Conservation Biology 2, 185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralls, K., Brugger, K. & Ballou, J. (1979). Inbreeding and juvenile mortality in small populations of ungulates. Science 206, 1101–1103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rave, E. H., Fleischer, R. C., Duvall, F. & Black, J. M. (1999). Factors influencing reproductive success in captive populations of Hawaiian Geese, Branta sandviencensis. Wildfowl 49, 36–44Google Scholar
Roldan, E. R. S., Cassinello, J., Abaigar, T. & Gomendio, M. (1998). Inbreeding, fluctuating asymmetry and ejaculate quality in an endangered ungulate. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265, 243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, K. K. (2000). Consequences and causes of mate choice by monogamous male oldfield mice, Peromyscus polionotus. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago
Ryan, K. K. & Altmann, J. (2001). Selection for male choice based primarily on mate compatibility in the oldfield mouse, Peromyscus polionotus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 50, 436–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, K. K. & Lacy, R. L. (2002). Monogamous male mice biased behaviour towards females according to very small differences in kinship. Animal Behaviour (in press)Google Scholar
Sharp, P. L. (1984). The effect of inbreeding on competitive male mating ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 106, 601–612Google ScholarPubMed
Shields, W. (1982). Philopatry, Inbreeding, and the Evolution of Sex. SUNY Albany Press, Albany, NY
Simmons, M. J. & Crow, J. F. (1977). Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annual Review of Genetics 11, 49–78CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slater, P. J. B. & Clements, F. A. (1981). Incestuous mating in zebra finches. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 57, 201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulé, M. E. (1987). Viable Populations for Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Thornhill, N. W. (Ed) (1993). The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Wildt, D. E., Bush, M., Goodrowe, K. L., Packer, C., Pusey, A. E., Brown, J. L., Joslin, P. & O'Brien, S. J. (1987) Reproductive and genetic consequences of founding isolated lion populations. Nature 329, 328–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Impacts of inbreeding on components of reproductive success
    • By Karen Koeninger Ryan, The University of Chicago, Committee on Evolutionary Biology, 1101 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A., Robert C. Lacy, The University of Chicago, Committee on Evolutionary Biology, 1101 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 and Department of Conservation Biology, Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, IL 60513, U.S.A., Susan W. Margulis, Department of Conservation Biology, Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, IL 60513, U.S.A.
  • Edited by William V. Holt, Zoological Society of London, Amanda R. Pickard, Zoological Society of London, John C. Rodger, David E. Wildt, Smithsonian National Zoological Park, Washington DC
  • Book: Reproductive Science and Integrated Conservation
  • Online publication: 21 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615016.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Impacts of inbreeding on components of reproductive success
    • By Karen Koeninger Ryan, The University of Chicago, Committee on Evolutionary Biology, 1101 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A., Robert C. Lacy, The University of Chicago, Committee on Evolutionary Biology, 1101 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 and Department of Conservation Biology, Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, IL 60513, U.S.A., Susan W. Margulis, Department of Conservation Biology, Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, IL 60513, U.S.A.
  • Edited by William V. Holt, Zoological Society of London, Amanda R. Pickard, Zoological Society of London, John C. Rodger, David E. Wildt, Smithsonian National Zoological Park, Washington DC
  • Book: Reproductive Science and Integrated Conservation
  • Online publication: 21 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615016.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Impacts of inbreeding on components of reproductive success
    • By Karen Koeninger Ryan, The University of Chicago, Committee on Evolutionary Biology, 1101 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, U.S.A., Robert C. Lacy, The University of Chicago, Committee on Evolutionary Biology, 1101 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 and Department of Conservation Biology, Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, IL 60513, U.S.A., Susan W. Margulis, Department of Conservation Biology, Chicago Zoological Society, Brookfield, IL 60513, U.S.A.
  • Edited by William V. Holt, Zoological Society of London, Amanda R. Pickard, Zoological Society of London, John C. Rodger, David E. Wildt, Smithsonian National Zoological Park, Washington DC
  • Book: Reproductive Science and Integrated Conservation
  • Online publication: 21 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615016.008
Available formats
×