Abbott, A. D. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Abercrombie, N. 1991. “The Privilege of the Producer.” In Enterprise Culture, ed. Keat, R. and Abercrombie, N.. London, Routledge

Abu-Lughod, L. 1997. “The Interpretation of Culture(s) after Television.” Representations 59: 109–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accenture. 2001. Egovernment Leadership: Rhetoric vs. Reality – Closing the Gap. Chicago: Accenture. Working Paper 17

Adler, P., and Adler, P., eds. 1987. Membership Roles in Field Research. Qualitative Research Methods Series. Newbury Park: Sage

Alexander, C. J., and Pal, L. A.. 1998. Digital Democracy: Policy and Politics in the Wired World. Toronto: Oxford University Press

Almond, G., and Verba, S.. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage

Althaus, S. L., and Tewksbury, D.. 2000. “Patterns of Internet and Traditional News Media Use in a Networked Community.” Political Communication 17(1): 21–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London and New York: Verso

Arterton, F. C. 1987. Teledemocracy: Can Technology Protect Democracy? Newbury Park, Calif. [Washington, D.C.]: Sage; Roosevelt Center for American Policy Studies

Bainbridge, W. 2003. “The Future of Internet: Cultural and Individual Conceptions.” In Society Online: The Internet in Context, ed. Howard, P. N. and Jones, S.. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage

Barley, S. 1986. “Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments.” Administrative Sciences Quarterly 31: 78–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barley, S. 1996. “Technicians in the Workplace: Ethnographic Evidence for Bringing Work into Organization Studies.” Administrative Sciences Quarterly 41: 404–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barley, S. 1997. Between Craft and Science: Technical Work in U.S. Settings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press

Barney, D. 2000. Prometheus Wired: The Hope for Democracy in the Age of Network Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Barrett, M., and Walsham, G.. 1999. “Electronic Trading and Work Transformation in the London Insurance Market.” Information Systems Research 10(1)Google Scholar

Bartels, L. 1996. “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40(1): 194–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bate, J. 1997. “Whatever Happened to Organizational Anthropology? A Review of the Field of Organizational Ethnography and Anthropological Studies.” Human Relations 50(9): 1147–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batt, R.. 2001. Net-Working, Work Patterns and Workforce Policies for the New Media Industry. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute

Baudrillard, J. 1978. Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. St. Louis: Telos

Baym, N. K. 2000. Tune in, Log On: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage

Behr, R., and Iyengar, S.. 1985. “Television News, Real World Cues, and Changes in the Public Agenda.” Public Opinion Quarterly 49(1): 38–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beniger, J. 1990. “Conceptualizing Information Technology as Organization, and Vice Versa.” In Organizations and Communication Technology, ed. Fulk, J. and Steinfield, C.. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage: 29–45

Bennett, D., and Fielding, P.. 1999. The Net Effect: How Cyberadvocacy Is Changing the Political Landscape. Washington, D.C.: Capitol Advantage

Benoit, W., and Benoit, P.. 2000. “The Virtual Campaign: Presidential Primary Websites in Campaign 2000.” American Communication Journal 3(3)Google Scholar

Berger, P., and Luckmann, T.. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday

Berman, J., and Weitzner, D.. 1995. “Abundance and User Control: Renewing the Democratic Heart of the First Amendment in the Age of Interactive Media.” Yale Law Journal 104(7): 1619–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bijker, W. E., and Law, J.. 1992. Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press

Bijker, W. E.. 1987. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press

Bimber, B. 1998a. “The Internet and Political Mobilization: Research Note on the 1996 Election Season.” Social Science Computer Review 16(4): 391–401Google Scholar

Bimber, B. 1998b. “The Internet and Political Transformation: Populism, Community, and Accelerated Pluralism.” Polity 31(1): 133–160Google Scholar

The Bivings Report. 2002. “Viral Marketing: How to Infect the World.” London: The Bivings Group. Working Paper, April

Blondheim, M. 1994. News over the Wires: The Telegraph and the Flow of Public Information in America, 1844–1897. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press

Blumenthal, S. 1982. The Permanent Campaign. New York: Simon and Schuster

Boczkowski, P. 2004. Digitizing the News: Innovation in Online Newspapers. Cambridge: MIT Press

Borsook, P. 2000. Cyberselfish: A Critical Romp through the Terribly Libertarian Culture of High Tech. New York: Public Affairs

Bourdieu, P. 1990. “Structure, Habitus, Practices.” In The Logic of Practice. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press: 52–65

Bourdieu, P. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production. New York, Columbia University Press

Bowker, G. C., and Star, S. L.. 1999. Sorting Things Out : Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press

Brants, K.. 1996. “The New Canals of Amsterdam: An Exercise in Local Electronic Democracy.” Media, Culture and Society 18: 233–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronson, P. 2000a. The First $20,000,000 Are Always the Hardest. New York: HarperPerennial

Bronson, P. 2000b. The Nudist on the Late Shift. New York: Broadway Books

Brown, J. S. 2000. The Social Life of Information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press

Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P.. 1991. “Organizational Learning and Communities of Practise.” Organizational Science 2: 40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Browning, G. 1996. Electronic Democracy: Using the Internet to Influence American Politics. Wilton, Conn.: Pemberton Press

Budge, I. 1997. The New Challenge of Direct Democracy. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press

Burbank, M. 1997. “Explaining Contextual Effects on Vote Choice.” Political Behavior. 19(2): 113–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calhoun, C. 1998. “Community without Propinquity Revisited: Communications Technology and the Transformation of the Urban Public Sphere.” Sociological Inquiry 68(3): 373–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canter, L. A., and Siegel, M. S.. 1994. How to Make a Fortune on the Information Superhighway: Everyone's Guerrilla Guide to Marketing on the Internet and Other on-Line Services. New York: HarperCollins

Cappella, J., Price, V., and Nir, L.. 2002. “Argument Repertoire as a Reliable and Valid Measure of Opinion Quality: Electronic Dialogue during Campaign 2000.” Political Communication 19(1): 73–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carmel, E. 1997. “American Hegemony in Packaged Software Trade and the ‘Culture of Software.’” Information Society 13: 125–142Google Scholar

Casey, C. 1996. The Hill on the Net: Congress Enters the Information Age. Boston: AP Professional

Casey, C. 2002. Interview, Washington, D.C.

Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. New York: Blackwell

Clemens, E. S. 1997. The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890–1925. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Clift, S. 2000. Interview, Los Angeles

Cohen, A. P. 1985. The Symbolic Construction of Community. London: E. Horwood; Tavistock

Congressional Quarterly. 2003. 105th Congress, 1995–1996 Election Results

Constant, D., and Sproull, L.. 1994. “What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing.” Information Systems Research 5(4): 400–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Constant, D.. 1996. “The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice.” Organizational Science 7(2): 119–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Contractor, N., and E. Eisenberg. 1990. “Communication Networks and New Media in Organizations.” In Organizations and Communication Technology, ed. Fulk, J. and Steinfield, C. W.. Newbury Park: Sage: 143–172

Contractor, N., and Monge, P.. 2004. Theories of Communication Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Converse, P. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Public.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, D.. New York: Free Press

Converse, P. 1987. “Changing Conceptions of Public-Opinion in the Political-Process.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51(4): S12–S24Google Scholar

Cornfield, M. 2000. Interview, Washington, D.C.

Correll, S. 1995. “The Ethnography of an Electronic Bar: The Lesbian Cafe.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 24(3): 270–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cummings, T. 1984. “Transorganizational Development.” Research in Organizational Behavior 6: 367–422Google Scholar

D'Alessio, D. 1997. “Use of the World Wide Web in the 1996 U.S. Election.” Electoral Studies 16(4): 489–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D'Alessio, D. 2000. “Adoption of the World Wide Web by American Political Candidates, 1996–1998.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44(4)Google Scholar

Daft, R., and Lengel, R.. 1986. “Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design.” Management Science 32(5): 554–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, R. A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Dahl, R. A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press

Davis, R., and Owen, D.. 1998. New Media and American Politics. New York: Oxford: University Press

Delli Carpini, M. 2000. “Gen.com: Youth, Civic Engagement, and the New Information Environment.” Political Communication 17(4): 341–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delli Carpini, M. X., and Keeter, S.. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press

Dewey, J. 1954. The Public and Its Problems. Athens: Ohio University Press

Diamond, E.. 1993. “Pop Goes Politics: New Media, Interactive Formats, and the 1992 Campaign.” American Behavioral Scientist 37(2): 257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dibbell, J. 1993. “How an Evil Clown, a Haitian Trickster Spirit, Two Wizards, and a Cast of Dozens Turned a Database into a Society.” Village Voice, December 21, pp. 36–42Google Scholar

Dijk, J. V., and Hacker, K. L.. 2000. Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory and Practice. London: Sage

DiMaggio, P. 1997. “Culture and Cognition.” Annual Review of Sociology 23: 263–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiMaggio, P.. 2001. “Social Implications of the Internet.” Annual Review of Sociology 27(1): 307–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dinkin, R. 1989. Campaigning in America: A History of Election Practices. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood

Doppelt, J. 1999. Nonvoters: America's No-Shows. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage

Dove, L. 2001. Interview, Washington, D.C.

Downing, J. 1989. “Computers for Political Change: Peacenet and Public Data Access.” Journal of Communication 39: 154–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downing, J. 1991. Computers for Social Change and Community Organizing. New York: Haworth

Drinkard, J. 1999. “E-Politics: How the Internet Is Transforming Grassroots Campaigns.” USA Today, August 31, p. 1Google Scholar

Dulio, D.. 1999. “Untangled Web: Internet Use during the 1998 Election.” PS: Political Science & Politics 32(1): 53–59Google Scholar

Dutton, W., and Kraemer, K. L.. 1985. Modeling as Negotiating: The Political Dynamics of Computer Models in the Policy Process. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex

Eliasoph, N. 1998. Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. Cambridge, U.K., and New York: Cambridge University Press

Elmer, G. 2004. Profiling Machines: Mapping the Personal Information Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press

Emirbayer, M., and Goodwin, J.. 1994. “Network Analysis, Culture and the Problem of Agency.” American Journal of Sociology 99(6): 1411–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Entman, R. M. 1989. Democracy without Citizens: Media and the Decay of American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press

Etzioni, A. 2000. “Debating the Societal Effects of the Internet: Connecting with the World.” Public Perspective 11(3): 43–43Google Scholar

Everard, J. 2000. Virtual States: The Internet and the Boundaries of the Nation-State. London: Routledge

Fallows, J. M. 1996. Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy. New York: Pantheon

Faucheux, R. 1998. “How Campaigns Are Using the Internet: An Exclusive Nationwide Survey.” Campaigns and Elections 19(9): 22–25Google Scholar

Ferdinand, P., ed. 2001. The Internet, Democracy and Democratization. London: Frank Cass

Ferejohn, J. A., and Kuklinski, J. H.. 1990. Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press

Fineman, S., and Gabriel, Y.. 1996. Experiencing Organizations. London and Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage

Foot, K., and S. Schneider. 2002. “2002 Campaign Web Sphere Analysis.” Pew Charitable Trusts, PoliticalWeb.Info. Http://politicalweb.info, accessed November 27, 2004

Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon

Foucault, M. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. Burchill, C. G. Graham and Miller, Peter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Foucault, M. 1999. “Power as Knowledge.” In Social Theory, the Multicultural and Classic Readings, ed. Lemert, C.. Boulder: Westview: 475–81

Frantzich, S. 1982. Computers in Congress: The Politics of Information. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage

Friedenberg, R. 1997. Communication Consultants in Political Campaigns. Westport, Conn.: Praeger

Friedland, L. 1996. “Electronic Democracy and the New Citizenship.” Media, Culture and Society 18: 185–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ganly, G. 1991. “Power to the People via Personal Electronic Media.” Washington Quarterly, Spring, pp. 5–22Google Scholar

Garton, L.. 1997. “Studying Online Social Networks.” Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 3(1): Online at http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/garton.htmlGoogle Scholar

Gerhards, J., and Rucht, D.. 1992. “Mesomobilization: Organizing and Framing Two Protest Campaigns in West Germany.” American Journal of Sociology 96: 555–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giddens, A. 1987. Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press

Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press

Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford Calif.: Stanford University Press

Glass, A. 1996. “On-Line Elections: The Internet's Impact on the Political Process.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 1(4): 140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, M. L. 2003. Guide to the 2004 Presidential Election. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press

Gould, R. 1995. Insurgent Identities; Class, Community and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Graber, D. A. 1996. “The ‘New’ Media and Politics: What Does the Future Hold?” PS: Political Science & Politics 29(1): 157–68Google Scholar

Grabher, G. 2001. “Ecologies of Creativity: The Village, the Group, and the Heterarchic Organization of the British Advertising Agency.” Environment and Planning A 33: 351–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grabher, G. 2002. “Fragile Sector, Robust Practice: Project Ecologies in New Media.” Environment and Planning A 34(11): 1903–2092CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, C. H. 2001. Cyborg Citizen: Politics in the Posthuman Age. New York and London: Routledge

Groper, R. 1996. “Electronic Mail and the Reinvogoration of American Democracy.” Social Science Computer Review 14(2): 157–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grossman, L. 1996. The Electronic Republic: Reshaping Democracy in the Information Age. New York: Penguin

Gutstein, D. 1999. E.Con. Toronto: Stoddart

Haas, P. M. 1990. Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of International Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press

Haas, P. M. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46(1): 147–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, J. 1970. Toward a Rational Society; Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Trans. Jeremy J. Shapiro. Boston: Beacon

Habermas, J. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT University Press

Hacker, K. 1996. “Missing Links: The Evolution of Electronic Democratization.” Media, Culture and Society 18(2): 213–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacker, K.. 1996. “Uses of Computer-Mediated Political Communication in the 1992 Presidential Campaign: A Content Analysis of the Bush, Clinton and Perot Computer Lists.” Communication Research Reports 13(2): 138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagel, J.. 1997. Net Gain: Expanding Markets through Virtual Communities. Boston: Harvard Business School Press

Hague, B. N., and Loader, B.. 1999. Digital Democracy: Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age. London and New York: Routledge

Hakken, D. 1999. Cyborgs@Cyberspace: An Ethnographer Looks to the Future. New York: Routledge

Hardesty, R. 1976. “The Computer's Role in Getting out the Vote.” In The New Style in Election Campaigns, ed. Agranoff, R.. Boston: Holbrook

Hardy, B. W., and Scheufele, D. A.. 2005. “Examining Differential Gains from Internet Use: Comparing the Moderating Role of Talk and Online Interactions.” Journal of Communication 55(1): 71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hargittai, E. 2003. “Serving Citizens' Needs: Minimizing Online Hurdles to Accessing Government Information.” IT & Society 1(3): 27–41Google Scholar

Harrison, L. E., and Huntington, S. P.. 2000. Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress. New York: Basic Books

Hauben, M. 1997. Netizens. Los Alamitos, Calif.: IEEE Computer Society Press

Hayward, A. 2000. Sam's Teach Yourself E-Democracy Today. Indianapolis: Sams

Heclo, H. 1999. “Hyperdemocracy.” Wilson Quarterly 24(1): 62–71Google Scholar

Herbst, S. 1998. Reading Public Opinion: How Political Actors View the Democratic Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Herrnson, P. S. 1992. “Campaign Professionalism and Fundraising in Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 54(3): 859–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilgartner, S., and Bosk, C.. 1988. “The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model.” American Journal of Sociology 94(1): 53–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, K. 1998. Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet. Lanham, Md: Rowan & Littlefield

Hill, S., and Hughes, J. G.. 1997. “Computer Mediated Political Communication: The Usenet and Political Communities.” Political Communication 14(1): 3–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hine, C. 2000. Virtual Ethnography. London and Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage

Hirsch, P. 1972. “Processing Fads and Fashions: An Organization-Set Analysis of Cultural Industry Systems.” American Journal of Sociology 77(4): 639–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horkheimer, M., and Adorno, T. W.. 1972. Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Herder and Herder

Howard, P. N. 2003. “Digitizing the Social Contract: Producing American Political Culture in the Age of New Media.” Communication Review 6(3): 213–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, P. N. 2005. “Deep Democracy, Thin Citizenship: The Impact of Digital Media in Political Campaign Strategy.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 597(1): 153–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, P. N., and T. J. Milstein. 2003. “Spiders, Spam, and Spyware: New Media and the Market for Political Information.” In Internet Studies 1.0, ed. Consalvo, M.. New York: Peter Lang

Howard, P. N.. 2001. “Days and Nights on the Internet: The Impact of a Diffusing Technology.” American Behavioral Scientist 45(3): 382–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huckfeldt, R. 1995. Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press

Huff, C.. 1989. “Computer Communication and Organizational Commitment: Tracing the Relationship in a City Government.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 19: 1371–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huntington, S. P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster

Hurwitz, R. 1999. “Who Needs Politics? Who Needs People? The Ironies of Democracy in Cyberspace.” Contemporary Sociology 28(6): 655–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Innis, H. 1991. The Bias of Communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press

Innis, H. A., and Innis, M.. 1972. Empire and Communications. Toronto: University of Toronto Press

Introna, L., and Nissenbum, H.. 2000. “Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters.” Information Society 16(3): 1–17Google Scholar

Ireland, E., and Nash, P. T.. 2001. Winning Campaigns Online: Strategies for Candidates and Causes. Bethesda, Md.: Science Writers Press

Jackall, R. 1988. Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Jagoda, K. 2000. E-Voter Study 2000: Measuring the Effectiveness of the Internet in Election 2000. Washington, D.C.: E-Voter Institute

Jagoda, K., and Nyhan, N.. 1999. E-Voter 98: Measuring the Impact of Online Advertising for a Political Candidate. Washington, D.C.: Westhill Partners

Jennings, K., and Zeitner, V.. 2003. “Internet Use and Civic Engagement.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67(3): 311–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, T.. 1999. “Doing the Traditional Media Sidestep: Comparing the Effects of the Internet and Other Nontraditional Media with Traditional Media in the 1996 Presidential Campaign.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 76(1): 99–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson-Cartee, K. S., and Copeland, G. A.. 1997. Inside Political Campaigns: Theory and Practise. Westport, Conn.: Praeger

Kamarck, E. C. 1999. “Campaigning on the Internet in the Elections of 1998.” In Democracy.Com?: Governance in the Network World, ed. Kamarck, E. C. and Nye, J. S.. Hollis, N.H.: Hollis

Kamarck, E. C. 2002. “Political Campaigning on the Internet: Business as Usual?” In Governance.Com: Democracy in the Information Age, ed. Nye, J. S.. Washington, D.C.: Brooking Institution Press

Kamarck, E. C., and Nye, J. S., eds. 1999. Democracy.Com?: Governance in the Network World. Hollis, N.H.: Hollis

Kamarck, E. C., and Nye, J. S.. 2002. Governance.Com: Democracy in the Information Age. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press

Katz, E. 1987. “Communications Research since Lazarsfeld.” Public Opinion Quarterly 51(Special): S25–S45Google Scholar

Katz, E. 1992. “On Parenting a Paradigm: Gabriel Tarde's Agenda for Opinion and Communication Research.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 4(1): 80–85Google Scholar

Kernell, S., and McDonald, M.. 1999. “Congress and America's Political Development: The Transformation of the Post Office from Patronage to Service.” American Journal of Political Science 43(3): 792–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiesler, S., and Sproull, L.. 1988. Technological and Social Change in Organizational Communication Environments. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Carnegie Mellon University Press

Kiesler, S., and Sproull, L.. 1992. “Group Decision Making and Communication Technology.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52(1): 96–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirp, D. 1992. “Two Cheers for the Electronic Town Hall: Or Ross Perot, Meet Alexis de Tocqueville.” The Responsive Community 2(4): 48–53Google Scholar

Klein, H. 1999. “Tocqueville in Cyberspace: Using the Internet for Citizen Associations.” Information Society 15(4): 213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klinenberg, E., and Perrin, A.. 2000. “Symbolic Politics in the Information Age: The 1996 Republican Presidential Campaigns in Cyberspace.” Information, Communication and Society 3(1): 17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kling, R. 1996. “Being Read in Cyberspace: Boutique and Mass Media Markets, Intermediation, and the Costs of on-Line Services.” Communication Review 1(3)Google Scholar

Klotz, R. 1998a. “Discussion of Women's Issues in the 1996 Internet Campaign.” Woman & Politics, 19(4): 67–86Google Scholar

Klotz, R. 1998b. “Virtual Criticism: Negative Advertising on the Internet in the 1996 Senate Race.” Political Communication 15: 347–365Google Scholar

Knack, S. 1995. “Does Moter-Voter Work? Evidence from State-Level Data.” Journal of Politics 57(3): 796–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knack, S., and White, J.. 1998. “Did States' Moter Voter Programs Help the Democrats?” American Politics Quarterly 26(3): 344–366Google Scholar

Knorr-Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press

Koehler, J. 1998. The Human Side of Intranets: Content, Style and Politics. Boca Raton, Fla.: Saint Lucie Press

Kohut, A., and Rainie, L.. 2003. Modest Increase in Internet Use for Campaign 2002. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research for the People and the Press, Pew Internet and American Life Project: 24

Kraut, R.. 1998. “Internet Paradox – a Social Technology That Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-Being?” American Psychologist 53(9): 1017–1031Google Scholar

Krosnick, J., and Telhami, S.. 1995. “Public Attitudes toward Israel: A Study of the Attentive and Issue Publics.” International Studies Quarterly 39(4): 535–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ku, G., Kaid, L. L., and Pfau, M.. 2003. “The Impact of Web Site Campaigning on Traditional News Media and Public Information Processing.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 80(3): 528–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kunda, G. 1992. Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press

Kush, C. 2000. Cybercitizen: How to Use Your Computer to Fight for All the Issues You Care About. New York: St. Martin's Griffin

Kush, C. 2004. The One-Hour Activist: The 15 Most Powerful Actions You Can Take to Fight for the Issues and Candidates You Care About. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Lane, F. S. 2001. Obscene Profits: The Entrepreneurs of Pornography in the Cyber Age. New York: Routledge

Latour, B. 1981. “Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macrostructure Reality and How Sociologists Help Them Do It.” In Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro and Macro Sociologies, ed. Knorr-Cetina, K. and Cicourel. Boston: Routledge: 277–303

Lazarsfeld, P., and R. Merton. 1948. “Mass-Communication, Popular Taste, and Organized Social Action.” In The Communication of Ideas, ed. Bryson, L.. New York: Harper & Brothers: 95–118

Lessard, B., and Baldwin, S.. 2003. Net-Slaves 2.0: Tales of “Surviving” the Great Tech Gold Rush. New York: Allworth

Lessig, L. 1999. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books

Lewis, M. 2000. “Knowledge Networks: The Two-Bucks-a-Minute Democracy.” New York Times Magazine, November 5, pp. 64–67Google Scholar

Lippmann, W. 1991. Public Opinion. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction

Luntz, F. 1988. Candidates, Consultants and Campaigns: The Style and Substance of American Electioneering. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell

Lupia, A. 1994. “Short Cuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 88(3): 63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, A. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Really Need to Know? New York: Cambridge University Press

Macauley, S. 1963. “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study.” American Sociological Review 28: 55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, C., and Steward, F.. 2000. Internet Communication and Qualitative Research Online: A Handbook for Researching Online. London: Sage

Mansbridge, J. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Marcus, G. 1995. “Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-sited Ethnography.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Margolis, M. 2000. Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace Revolution. Walnut Creek, Calif.: AltaMira

Margolis, M.. 1997. “Campaigning on the Internet: Parties and Candidates on the World Wide Web in the 1996 Primary Season.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2(1): 59–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Markham, A. 1998. Life Online: Researching Real Experience in Virtual Space. Walnut Creek, Calif.: AltaMira

Massey, D. S., and Denton, N. A.. 1993. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press

Mauser, G. 1983. Political Marketing: An Approach to Campaign Strategy. New York: Praeger

McAdam, D. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

McGrath, M. 2000. “Wired for Civic Engagement: Using New Technology to Build Community.” National Civic Review 89(3): 193–202Google Scholar

McLean, I. 1989. Democracy and New Technology. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity

McLuhan, M. 1994. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge: MIT University Press

McNulty, W., and Truslow, H.. 2002. How It Looked Inside the Booth. New York Times, November 6, p. B9Google Scholar

Mele, C. 1999. “Cyberspace and Disadvantaged Communities: The Internet as a Tool for Collective Action.” In Communities in Cyberspace, ed. Smith, M. A. and Kollock, P.. London: Routledge: 290–310

Merton, R. K.. 1946. Mass Persuasion: The Social Psychology of a War Bond Drive. New York: Harper

Milbank, D. 1999. “Virtual Politics: Candidates' Consultants Create the Customized Campaign.” New Republic, July 5, pp. 22–27Google Scholar

Miles, S. 2001. How to Hack a Party Line: The Democrats and Silicon Valley. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux

Miller, D., and Slater, D.. 2000. The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford and New York: Berg

Moll, M., and Shade, L., eds. 2001. E-Commerce vs. E-Commons: Communications in the Public Interest. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives

Morrill, C., and Fine, G.. 1997. “Ethnographic Contributions to Organizational Sociology.” Sociological Methods and Research 25(4): 424–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, D. 1999. Vote.Com. Los Angeles: Renaissance Books

Morris, D. 2000. Interview, New York, N.Y.

Mutz, D. 1995. “Effects of Horse-Race Coverage on Campaign Coffers: Strategic Contributing in Presidential Primaries.” Journal of Politics 57(4): 1015–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myers, D. D. 1993. “New Technology and the 1992 Clinton Presidential Campaign.” American Behavioral Scientist 37(2): 181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neff, G. 2005. Venture Labor: Work and the Burden of Risk in New York's Internet Industry

Neff, G., and D. Stark. 2004. “Permanently Beta: Responsive Organization in the Internet Era.” In Society Online: The Internet in Context, ed. Howard, P. N. and Jones, S.. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage

Nie, N., and Erbring, L.. 2000. “Our Shrinking Social Universe.” Public Perspective 11(3): 44–45Google Scholar

Noble, P. 2000. Interview, Los Angeles

Norman, D. 1989. The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books

Norris, P. 2000a. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press

Norris, P. 2000b. “The Internet and U.S. Elections, 1992–2000.” In Governance.Com: Democracy in the Information Age, ed. Kamarck, E. C. and Nye, J. S.. Cambridge, Mass., and Washington, D.C.: Visions of Governance in the 21st Century, Brookings Institution Press: 59–77

Ogburn, W. 1937. “The Influence of Inventions on American Social Institutions in the Future.” American Journal of Sociology 43(3): 365–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orlikowski, W. 1995. Evolving with Notes: Organizational Change around Groupware Technology. Cambridge: Sloan School Working Paper 186

Orlikowski, W., and Barley, S.. 2001. “Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other?” MIS Quarterly 25(2): 145–165Google Scholar

Ornstein, N. J., and Mann, T. E.. 2000. The Permanent Campaign and Its Future. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute; Brookings Institution

Orr, J. 1996. Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, N.Y.: IRL Press

Paccagnella, L. 1997. “Getting the Seats of Your Pants Dirty: Strategies for Ethnographic Research on Virtual Communities.” Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 3(1): http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue1/paccagnella.htmlGoogle Scholar

Palast, G. 2003. “Winner Takes All.” The Big Issue, June 16–22, pp. 10–11Google Scholar

Parsons, T. 1969. Politics and Social Structure. New York: Free Press

Patterson, O. 1997. The Ordeal of Integration: Progress and Resentment in America's “Racial” Crisis. Washington, D.C.: Counterpoint

Pellow, D. N., Weinberg, A., and Schnaiberg, A.. 1995. “Pragmatic Corporate Cultures: Insights from a Recycling Enterprise.” Greener Management International 12: 95–110Google Scholar

Perrow, C. 1999. Normal Accidents. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press

Phillips, J. 2000. Interview, Washington, D.C.

Pickering, J., and King, J.. 1995. “Hardwiring Weak Ties: Interorganizational Computer-Mediated Communication, Occupational Communities, and Organizational Change.” Organizational Science 6(4): 479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Podolny, J., and Page, K.. 1998. “Network Forms of Organization.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 57–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poster, M. 1990. The Mode of Information. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity

Poster, M. 1995. The Second Media Age. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity

Postman, N. 1993. Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Vintage

Pratt, A. 2002. “Hot Jobs in Cool Places: The Material Cultures of New Media Product Spaces; the Case of the South of the Market, San Francisco.” Information, Communication and Society 5(1): 27–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Project Vote Smart. 2005. “Vote Smart Web Yellow Pages.” Project Vote Smart. http://www.vote-smart.org, accessed May 2005

Puopolo, S. 2001. “The Web and U.S. Senatorial Campaigns 2000.” American Behavioral Scientist 44(12): 2030–2047CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster

Putnam, R. D.. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press

Radway, J. 1988. “Reception Study: Ethnography and the Problem of Dispersed Audiences and Nomadic Subjects.” Cultural Studies 2(3): 359–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rainie, L. 2000. Trust and Privacy Online: Why Americans Want to Rewrite the Rules. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet and American Life Project

Ransell, E. 1999. “Democracy Is an Interactive Form of Government: Tracey Western.” Fast Company, Issue 30, December, p. 302Google Scholar

Rash, W. 1997. Politics on the Nets: Wiring the Political Process. New York: W. H. Freeman

Redd, L. 1988. “Telecommunications, Economics and Black Families in America.” Journal of Black Studies 19(1): 111–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reed, L. 2001. Interview, Washington, D.C.

Rheingold, H. 1993. Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley

Rheingold, H. 2002. Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: Perseus

Rice, R., and J. Katz 2003. “The Internet and Political Involvement in 1996 and 2000.” In Society Online: The Internet in Context, ed. Jones, S.. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage

Ronfeldt, D. 1992. Cyberocracy Is Coming. New York: Taylor and Francis

Rosen, E. 2000. The Anatomy of Buzz: How to Create Word-of-Mouth Marketing. New York: Doubleday/Currency

Sabato, L. 1981. The Rise of Political Consultants: New Ways of Winning Elections. New York: Basic Books

Sabato, L. 1988. Magic – or Blue Smoke and Mirrors? Reflections on New Technologies and Trends in the Political Consultant Trade. Washington, D.C.: Annenberg Washington Program, Communications Policy Studies, Northwestern University

Sabel, C. F. 1990. “Moebius-Strip Organizations and Open Labor Markets: Some Consequences of the Reintegration of Conception and Execution in a Volatile Economy.” In Social Theory for a Changing Society, ed. Coleman, J.. Boulder: Westview: 23–54

Sabel, C. F. 1992. “Studied Trust: Building New Forms of Co-operation in a Volatile Economy.” In Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration, ed. Pyke, B. and Sengenberger, W.. Geneva, Switzerland: Institute for Labour Studies: 215–250

Sachs, H. 1995. “Computer Networks and the Formation of Public Opinion.” Media, Culture and Society 17(1): 81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sassen, S. 2004. “Sited Materialities with Global Span.” In Society Online: The Internet in Context, ed. Howard, P. N. and Jones, S.. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage: 295–306

Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press

Scammell, M. 2000. “The Internet and Civic Engagement: The Age of the Citizen-Consumer.” Political Communication 17(4): 351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schier, S. E. 2000. By Invitation Only: The Rise of Exclusive Politics in the United States. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press

Schneider, S. M. 2001. “Congressional Candidate Web Sites in Campaign 2000: What Web Enthusiasts Wanted, What Candidates Provided.” NetElection.org. Http://web.archive.org/web/20010602192820/netelection.org/research/jan10report.pdf, Accessed August 23, 2004

Schudson, M. 1998. The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Martin Kessler

Schwartz, E. 1996. Netactivism: How Citizens Use the Internet. Sebastopol, Calif.: Songline Studies

Scott, J. C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven and London: Yale University Press

Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press

Scott, J. 2000. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage

Selnow, G. 1994. High-Tech Campaigns: Computer Technology in Political Communication. Westport, Conn.: Praeger

Selnow, G. 1998. Electronic Whistle-Stops: The Impact of the Internet on American Politics. Westport, Conn.: Praeger

Sewell, W. 1992. “A Theory of Structure, Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology 98(1): 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., and Holbert, R. L.. 2001. ““Connecting” and “Disconnecting” with Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital.” Political Communication 18(2): 141–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, C., and Varvian, H.. 1999. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press

Shenk, D. 1997. Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut. San Francisco: Harper Edge

Silver, D. 2000. “Margins in the Wires: Looking for Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Blacksburg Electronic Village.” In Race in Cyberspace, ed. Kolko, B., Nakamura, L., and Rodman, G. B.. Boston: Routledge: 133–150

Silver, M., and Geller, D.. 1978. “On the Irrelevance of Evil: The Organization and Individual Action.” Journal of Social Issues 34(4): 125–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simmel, G., and Wolff, K. H.. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press

Smith, M. R., and Marx, L.. 1994. Does Technology Drive History?: The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. Cambridge: MIT Press

Spears, R., and Lea, M.. 1994. “Panacea or Panopticon? The Hidden Power in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Communication Research 21(4): 428–459Google Scholar

Sproull, L. 1992. Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization. Cambridge: MIT Press

Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S.. 1986. “Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication.” Management Science 32(11): 1492–1512CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stark, D. 1999. “Heterarchy: Distributing Intelligence and Organizing Diversity.” In The Biology of Business: Decoding the Natural Laws of Enterprise, ed. Clippinger, J.. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 153–179

Starke-Meyerring, D., et al. 2004. “American Internet Users and Privacy: A Safe Harbor of Their Own?” In Society Online: The Internet in Context, ed. Howard, P. N. and Jones, S.. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage

Stimson, J. A. 2004. Tides of Consent: How Opinion Movements Shape American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press

Stromer-Galley, J. 2000. “Online Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It.” Journal of Communication 50(4): 111–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stromer-Galley, J. 2003. “Will Internet Voting Increase Turnout? An Analysis of Vote Preference.” In Society Online: The Internet in Context, ed. Jones, S.. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage

Suchman, L. A. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press

Sunstein, C. R. 2001. Republic.com. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press

Swidler, A. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51: 273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tambini, D. 1999. “New Media and Democracy: The Civic Networking Movement.” New Media & Society 1(3): 305–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tarde, G. 1898. Opinion and Conversation: L'opinion et la foule. Paris: Alcan

Tarrow, S. 2003. “Rooted Cosmopolitans: Transnational Activists in a World of States.” Cornell University. Workshop on Transnational Contention. Working Paper: 2001–2003. March 19

Taylor, H. 2000. “Does Internet Research Work?” International Journal of Market Research 42(1): 51–63Google Scholar

Tedesco, J. C., et al. 1998. “Presidential Campaigning on the Information Superhighway: An Exploration of Content and Form.” In The Electronic Election: Perspectives on the 1996 Campaign Communication, ed. Kaid, L. L. and Bystrom, D. G.. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum

Tehranian, M. 1990. Technologies of Power: Information Machines and Democratic Prospects. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex

Tewksbury, D., and Althaus, S.. 2000. “Differences in Knowledge Acquisition among Readers of the Paper and Online Versions of a National Newspaper.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 77(3): 457–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tewksbury, D., Weaver, A., and Maddex, B.. 2001. “Accidentally Informed: Incidental News Exposure on the World Wide Web.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 78(3): 533–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toffler, A. 1985. The Adaptive Corporation. New York: McGraw-Hill

Toffler, A. 1990. Powershift: Knowledge, Wealth, and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century. New York: Bantam

Toffler, A., and Toffler, H.. 1995. Creating a New Civilization: The Politics of the Third Wave. Atlanta: Turner

Tsagarousianou, R.. 1998. Cyberdemocracy: Technology, Cities, and Civic Networks. London and New York: Routledge

Turkle, S. 1995. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Touchstone

Uzzi, B. 1996. “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect.” American Sociological Review 61: 674–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uzzi, B. 1997. “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness.” Administrative Sciences Quarterly 42(3): 35–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maanan, J., and Barley, S.. 1984. “Occupational Communities: Culture and Control in Organizations.” Research in Organizational Behavior 6: 287–365Google Scholar

Vaughan, D. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at Nasa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Walch, J. 1999. In the Net: An Internet Guide for Activists. London: Zed Books

Walker, J. 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press

Warner, M. 2003. Machine Politics in the Digital Age. New York Times, November 9

Warnick, B., and Endres, D.. 2004. “Text-Based Interactivity in Candidate Campaign Web Sites: A Case Study from the 2002 Elections.” Western Journal of Communication 68(3): 322–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Webster, F. 1995. Theories of the Information Society. London: Routledge

Webster, J., and Lin, S.. 2002. “The Internet Audience: Web Use as Mass Behavior.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 46(1): 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press

West, D. 1993. Air Wars: Television Advertising in Election Campaigns, 1952–1992. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press

Wicks, R., and Souley, B.. 2003. “Going Negative: Candidate Usage of Internet Web Sites during the 200 Presidential Campaign.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 80(1)Google Scholar

Wilhelm, A. 2000. Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge

Williams, R. 1985. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press

Williams, R., and Williams, E.. 2003. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. London and New York: Routledge

Willock, R. 1998. “Digital Democracy: The 96 Presidential Campaign On-Line.” In The 1996 Presidential Campaign: A Communication Perspective, ed. Denton, R.. Westport, Conn.: Praeger: 179–197

Winner, L. 1980. “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus 109(1): 121–136Google Scholar

Witte, J., and P. N. Howard. 2002. “The Future of Polling: Relational Inference and the Development of Internet Survey Instruments.” In Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy and the Future of American Democracy, ed. Manza, J., Cook, F. L., and Page, B. I.. New York: Oxford University Press: 272–289

Witte, J.. 2000. “Method and Representation in Internet-Based Survey Tools: Mobility, Community, and Cultural Identity in Survey 2000.” Social Science Computer Review 18(2): 179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wittig, M., and Schmitz, J.. 1996. “Electronic Grassroots Organizing.” Journal of Social Issues 52(1): 53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, R. 1995. Hyperdemocracy. Time Magazine, January 23, pp. 15–21Google Scholar

Xenos, M. A., and Foot, K. A.. 2005. “Politics as Usual, or Politics Unusual? Position Taking and Dialogue on Campaign Websites in the 2002 U.S. Elections.” Journal of Communication 55(1): 169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yates, J. 1993. Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

Young, O. 1991. “Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society.” International Organization 43(4): 349–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zaller, J., and Feldman, S.. 1992. “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response – Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 36(3): 579–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zerubavel, E. 1992. Terra Cognita: The Mental Discovery of America. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press